m e t h o d o l o g y 


Submitted By  Osama Masood Khan  40 

Page 1
Introduction, what is Interview, Interview Defined

Page 2-4
Typology, Ways to conduct interviews

Page 5-6
Significance, Arguments

Page 7

Page 8
Bibliography and Webliography

Researches are different from their nature having something in common. One of the most common features in research is data collection. Data can be collected through different methods which include surveys, questionnaires, sampling and interviews. As we are assign to work on a specific research method. Research methods are of several types which can be used according to situational and conditional purposes. The method which I have selected for my assignment is Interviewing Method which comes under the qualitative research. In simple words interview is a conversation between two people or more in which one is the interviewer - seeking answers for specific purpose from the other person – the interviewee. Interviews are the personal form of research rather than questionnaires because interviewer directly works with the respondent. They are conducted on different basis like job interviews are conducted to hire a new employee, student often conduct interviews in organizations to get information what they are required and similarly researchers also conduct interviews in order to analyze and evaluate their research work. What is Interview…. Interview is the way of talking and listening to people and date is collected through this conversation. In this questions are asked by the researcher who is interviewer and data is collected from the person who is interviewee means respondent. The interviewer must memorize the opinions and answers responded about the topic and the extracted data is primary for the study. Interview is the most common method of obtaining information about the behavior, attitudes, and other characteristics of people. The form and pattern of interview can be determined by its purpose, we can see this difference clearly in interviews like for job selection, market research, medical or research interview. Interview Defined “An interchange of views between two or more people on a topic of mutual interest, sees the centrality of human interaction for knowledge production, and emphasizes the social situatedness of research data.” (Kvale, 1996)

Through interviews we get direct and authentic answer from the respondent which is readily available in their minds and are not predefined. Real things come to knowledge because respondents are mostly acknowledging with their experiences and current situation.

Submitted to Ma’am Anila Akhtar

Interviews are a systematic way to collect information from individuals. It is an exchange of views between two or more people on a topic of mutual interest. There are many types of interviews which can be used to conduct any research: • • • • • Informal, conversational interview General interview guide approach Standardized, open-ended interview Closed, fixed-response interview Non-directive interviews

Informal conversational interview: This type of interview is just like a chat between two or more people sharing their experiences with each other, during this interview informants may sometimes forget that they are being interviewed. No fixed questions are asked. For example: I am a student of Public Administration working on a project, and one of my friend works for any public service department, I get engage with him in a conversation regarding his job so whatever he would be discussing will help to extract information what I have needed. General interview guide approach: In this type of interview, a basic checklist is prepared to make sure that all relevant topics are covered. The interviewer is free to explore, investigate and ask questions deemed interesting to the researcher, this type of approach is used when you need to ask similar kind of questions from each interviewee. For example: I am working on a marketing research project in which I have to explore same products by different manufacturers, so interviewing with different companies and asking them same questions like about product’s quality, price, consumer feedbacks etc. Standardized open-ended interview: Open-ended interview is based on the questions which have no fixed options; these questions are carefully worded and arranged for the purpose of minimizing variation in the questions posed to the interviewees. Such questions are useful for obtaining in-depth information on facts with which the researcher is not very familiar, opinions, attitudes and suggestions of informants and sensitive issues.

Submitted to Ma’am Anila Akhtar

For example: What is your opinion on the services provided in your organization? (Explain why.) What do you think are the reasons of high crimes? The answers to these questions will be replied in the words of the respondents. Open-ended questions allow you to get more deeply into issues of interest being raised. Information provided in the respondents’ own words might be useful as examples or illustrations, which add interest to the final report. Open-ended questions take time when their answers are analyzed so interviewer must experience enough to manage and analyze efficiently.

Closed, fixed response interview: In this type of interview questions are asked with the given alternatives and interviewees have to pick answers from same sets of multiple choice answers. This design is functional for those not experienced in interviewing. Closed questions are most commonly used for background variables such as age, marital status or education; although in the case of age and education you may also take the exact values and categorize them during data analysis. Closed questions may be used to get the respondents to express their opinions or attitudes by choosing rating points on a scale. For example: What is your opinion on the following statement? ‘Pakistani cricketers should be punished after the match fixing scandal’

Closed questions may also be used if one is only interested in certain aspects of an issue and does not want to waste time obtaining more information than one needs. For example, a researcher who is only interested in the sources of protein in a family diet may ask:

Submitted to Ma’am Anila Akhtar

‘Did you eat any of the following foods yesterday?’ (Circle yes if at least one item in each set of items is eaten.)

They save time in comparing responses of different groups, or of the same group over time, become easier. But sometimes respondent’s desired answer is not among the given alternatives so they give wrong or unreal answers. Non-directive interviews: In this type of interview no proper questions are listed, and no pattern of interview is defined, the interviewer follows what interviewee has to say. Interviewer does not take the lead. This type of interview becomes more like an informal talk, even the interviewee is free to ask any kind of question from the person who is taking interview but the interviewer has to keep in mind the purpose of investigation. There are some ways to conduct interviews: 1. Face-to-face interviews 2. Telephonic interviews 3. Computer assisted interviews Face-to-face interviews: Most of the unstructured interviews are conducted face-to-face, in this type of interview the interviewer and interviewee are sitting together and talking on the defined topic which is under observation. In this type of interview the interviewer easily catches the expressions of the individual giving answers, either he is relaxed or nervous, he can easily read his mind through his body language and face expressions. This type of interviews are considered time consuming in sense of getting appointments for meeting and expensive in sense of traveling, but beside all this is the most information oriented way to get authentic information. Telephonic interviews: This type of interview is done through the telephone. This is usually a structured type of interview. Telephonic interviews are best suited when information from a large number of respondents spread over a wide geographical area is to be obtained quickly. The main

Submitted to Ma’am Anila Akhtar

drawback of this is that exact and in detail information is not achievable which you can get in a face to face interview. Computer assisted interviews: With computer assisted interviews, questions are flashed onto the computer screen and interviewers can enter the answers of respondents directly into the computer. In this type of interviews in some cases answers may not be favorable to the respondent which leads to have false information.

There has been a major change in methods when we talk about research. New methods are introduced through the computer technology and latest equipments. But regardless of all interviews possess their value still. The quality of research depends upon the quality of data collections tools though interviewing tool and questioning is one of the most used research methods and has its own quality and gravity. After it is decided to use this technique a self study is needed to know that what exactly we want to know, what type of questions should be asked, whom we are going to ask questions, what techniques and methods should be followed to conduct interviews. Interviews gives you face to face real inside and true response form the respondent, not only the response but interviewer can also judge many minor things through the expressions of interviewee. It is the best of exchange of information for both interviewer and the respondent. You can get to know in detail which a respondent can not sum up into words in written, he can easily communicate those things verbally. The design of interview is to extract exclusive information based on facts and experiences which serves as the asset in research and helps the researcher to have better and quality information regarding their objectives.

Interview permits participants to talk about their experiences in their own words, and allow them to elaborate on any areas of interest or importance. Interview can be more insightful than other methods. A face-to-face interview allows you to assess the participant’s body language, facial expressions, tone of voice, etc. As well as the undoubted strengths of interview there are many potential flaws that need to be considered. Interview requires more resources than other techniques like questionnaire, they may be expensive both in terms of time and travelling, if your funds are restricted to a small amount than you have to consider a little sample which may be not adequate to give accurate results or cannot represent the whole population. What I believe interview may conduct a biased result by unconscious or conscious verbal reactions. For example if a participant nodding throughout the interview, the interviewer

Submitted to Ma’am Anila Akhtar

may interpret this action in a negative way and he fails the participant’s efforts. The results of the interview may not be so clear because the calculation process is not that straight like questionnaire. As with the self-report measures, the quality of data is dependent upon the responses of interviewee, if the interviewee has incorrect knowledge it can create a big problem in the whole research process. But here a question comes in people’s mind is it better to have questionnaires? The answer to this is ‘yes’ in some cases but questionnaire data is limited and one cannot explore the answers. The positive feature of interview is its richness and brilliance of material collected through it. In a research using different kinds of data collection techniques but the interview material is always interesting and enables you to understand more deeply like rather than other kinds of data like statistical analysis or questionnaires even. It is a fact that any general statement written in report will attract the reader less than a direct statement quote by the interviewee. The most discussed factors about interviews are time and cost but the data collected balanced the bounty of these factors. It is quite true that in research how easier the data you collected less it is valuable.

Submitted to Ma’am Anila Akhtar

Hence we can conclude that in today’s time research has spread all over from a single person to the large highly equipped and qualified researchers under one roof. What basically is the purpose of research is to have more and betterment of the people for this asking themselves what their queries and what their perceptions are that plays a great part and for that interviewing method meets the requirement. Because we all know that different people different minds and different opinions so asking people and then analyze that what we have learnt and what we got to know about our objective(s). Though we can say that after considering other methodologies and interview apart, it possess its own brilliance in accordance to have an authentic and full of experience information which serves as an best instrument while research. Because research means latest and updated material and interview is the only source to that.

Submitted to Ma’am Anila Akhtar

Research methods for business-A skill building approach-4th edition by Uma Sekaran The Research Interview by Bill Gillham

http://dictionary.reference.com/ http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-56614-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/intrview.php

Submitted to Ma’am Anila Akhtar