0 views

Uploaded by Vinsensia Dita

jurnal

- 10.0000@Psycnet.apa.Org@Journals@Amp@34@7@571
- Business Statistics 42petwkAWt
- Transformations of Variables
- SingleConstantKM-2007
- Sample Journal
- peni2010.pdf
- Multiple Regression Analysis
- Applied Regression Analysis - STAT 225 Z1 - Course Syllabus or Other Course-Related Document
- maccallum_on_dichotomizing.pdf
- Influence
- Chapter 3 Notes
- Out-Of-Trend Identification and Removal in Stability Modelling
- Module 2 Slr
- Econometrics 1
- Chapter 11
- level-2-r-11
- Ch 17 Correlation vs Regression
- Econometrics_ch2.ppt
- Predict the v and Depth of Lake 2011
- ptest2

You are on page 1of 7

Original Research

www.ejfs.co.uk

DOI: 10.5455/ejfs.191463

limb measurements among Egyptian

population

Abeer Abdel-wahab Ibrahim Sharaf El-Din1, Shereen Mohamed

Sobhy Elkholy1, Mohamed Ibrahim Yousef2

1

Depatrment of ABSTRACT

Forensic Medicine and

Background: Identification of living individual or dead is a challenging task for forensic experts and physical

Clinical Toxicology,

Faculty of Medicine,

anthropologists worldwide. At the same time, prediction of stature is one of the key parameters in the identity

Benha University, of victims of mass disasters or fatal assaults, especially in incomplete or isolated extremities, mutilated

Egypt, 2Department human remains, and highly decomposed bodies. Purpose: The aim of the current study was to assess the

of Radiology, Faculty correlation between some upper limb measurements and personal stature and to set regression equations

of Medicine, Benha for stature estimation in an adult Egyptian population. Subjects and Methods: To construct the equations;

University, Egypt nine anthropometric measurements were recorded for 500 healthy adult Egyptian Arab volunteers comprising

250 males and 250 females with ages ranging from 25 to 40 years, the stature, arm length, forearm length,

Address for correspondence:

hand length, hand breadth, and four fingers (index, middle, ring, and little fingers) lengths were measured.

Abeer Abdel-wahab Ibrahim

Sharaf El-Din, Department Results: A significant positive correlation between stature and all measurements were observed in both

of Forensic Medicine sexes. Regression models are constructed to estimate stature on the basis of all measurements for males

and Clinical Toxicology, and females. The accuracy of the regression equations was verified by comparing the estimated stature with

Faculty of Medicine,

the actual measured stature. Conclusion: This study provides new forensic standards for stature estimation

Benha University, Egypt.

E-mail: abeer2539801@ from the upper limb measurements of the adult Egyptian population.

yahoo.com/ abir.

sharafeldein@fmed.bu.edu.

eg

Accepted: October 05, 2015 KEY WORDS: Forensic sciences, forensic anthropology, Egyptian population, personal identification,

Published: November 09, 2016 stature estimation, upper limb

that there are inter-racial and inter-geographical differences in

Identification of living or dead one is the main goal of forensic measurements and their correlation with stature. Therefore, a

investigations [1]. It is required in recently dead persons, formula for one population does not necessarily yield reliable

decomposing, mutilated bodies, and fragmentary remains [2]. In results for another due to inherent population variations that

such situation, estimation if stature becomes equally important may be attributed to genetic and environmental factors as

along with other parameters as age, sex, and race in personal climate, nutrition, and lifestyle. Therefore, regression formula

identity [3]. This process can narrow down the pool of victims for stature estimation should be population-specific [16,17].

needing to be matched, allowing for more definitive markers,

such as DNA, to be later used for the confirmation of final The two basic methods of estimating living stature from long

identifications [4]. bones and body parts are the anatomical method and the

mathematical method. The anatomical method is considered

When the bodies are dismembered or mutilated in wars, mass to provide the best approximation of stature, but its main

disasters, and crimes; a practical alternative is to develop new drawbacks are that it requires a complete skeleton [18,19]. In

standards that utilize different parts of the skeleton, e.g., contrast, the main advantage of the mathematical method is

the sternum [5], metacarpal bones [6], calcaneus bone [7], that it requires a single bone or body part, but its predictive

and maximum skull length [8]. Furthermore, many previous ability is less accurate because of wide variability in population

studies have shown the correlation of stature with body body proportions. Within the mathematical method, regression

appendages [9-11]. Others have tried to estimate the stature analysis is considered to be a better and more reliable tool than

using different body parts as lower limb [12], arm span [13], multiplication factor analysis [20,21].

Sharaf El-Din, et al.: Prediction of stature based on upper limb measurements

In circumstances where only mutilated arm and/or forearm process of the shoulder blade) to the most distal point on the

portions are available for a deceased person, it becomes quite capitulum of humerus. This is done by holding the forearm

challenging to formulate the proper and adequate regression at right angles to the upper arm, when the capitulum of the

models. Hence, this study was done to assess the relationship humerus can be palpated very easily [25].

between personal stature and some upper limb measurements • Forearm length (FL): Was measured as the direct distance

among a group of living adult Egyptian males and females between the most proximal point of the olecranon process

and to develop predictive equations to estimate stature of an and the styloid process while the elbow was flexed to

individual from some upper limb measurements. 90 degrees and the fingers were extended in the direction

of the long axis of the forearm [26].

SUBJECTS AND METHODS • Hand length (HL): Was measured with a digital sliding

caliper as the direct linear distance between the distal wrist

This study was conducted on 500 healthy adult Arab Egyptian crease and the distal end of the most anterior projecting

volunteers, comprising 250 males and 250 females, from the point, i.e. tip of the middle finger. The subjects were asked

companions of cases referred to Radiological Department, to place their hands supine on a flat hard horizontal surface

Benha University Hospitals, Benha Faculty of Medicine, Egypt. with fingers extended and adducted, following which the

The volunteers were recruited from Benha city, Qalyubia hand length was measured [11].

Governorate, Egypt, and surrounding vicinities. The ages of • Hand breadth (HB): Was measured with a digital sliding

the subjects ranged from 25 to 40 years. The lower age limit caliper as the distance between the most lateral point on the

was 25 years to be sure of complete development and attaining head of the second metacarpal bone and the most medial

maximum growth and maturity, as previous studies have stated point on the head of the fifth metacarpal bone [25].

that although stature at 18-year-old is generally accepted as • Fingers length: Was measured with a digital sliding caliper on

being adult level stature, the median age for attaining full stature the ventral surface of the left hand from the most proximal

in males is 21.2-year-old, with growth continuing in 10% of crease of the finger to the tip of the index finger, middle

males until they are 23.5-year-old [22] while the upper limit is finger, ring finger, and little finger in the hand using a

taken as 40 years since growth regression starts thereafter [23]. digital sliding caliper. Thumb was excluded because reliable

measurement landmarks are difficult to establish [27].

Left-handed subjects were excluded from the study to avoid any

variation on two sides caused by limb dominance. Therefore, Statistical Analysis

right-handed subjects were included in the study. The subjects

with any disease, injury, fracture, physical deformity, amputation, Before data collection, assessment of precision and reliability

or history of any surgical procedures of the upper limb were of the stature and upper limb measurement were done in

excluded from the study. Informed consents were obtained from accordance with the study of Ahmed [4], where the stature

each individual. The data collection was conducted at fixed and upper limb dimensions of ten subjects were measured on

time, between 9:00 am and 11:00 am, to avoid the influence three different evaluation days, with two days between the re-

of diurnal variation as it affects the standards generated and measurements. The absolute technical error of measurement

equations developed for the estimation of stature [24]. (TEM) was initially calculated using the following equation.

selected 10 males and 10 females and tested for a significant TEM = ∑D 2

between both sides. Therefore, all measurements were obtained

from the left side in all cases. The measurements were done by Where D represents the difference between each two successive

the same observer and with the same instrument, to avoid any measurements, and N represents the number of individuals.

technical and/or inter-observer error. The current study was done Then, the relative technical error of measurement (rTEM) was

according to standard ethics drawn by the Benha University calculated from each two successive sets of measurements by

ethical committee for human experimentation. Using standard dividing the TEM for a given variable by the grand mean of that

anthropometric instruments and techniques, the following variable and multiplying the result by 100. In addition to these

anthropometric measurements were measured: measurements, the coefficient of reliability was calculated. The

• Stature: Height of the subject was measured in standing intra-observer measurement error and reliability were calculated

position. The subject was instructed to stand barefooted to be within the acceptable standards for all measurements

on the board of a standard standiometer with both feet (coefficient of reliability > 0.9 and rTEM < 5%).

in close contact with each other, trunk braced along the

vertical board, and the head adjusted in Frankfurt plane The data were computed and analyzed using SPSS (Statistical

(the lateral palpebral commissure and the upper border of Package for Social Sciences, version 16) computer software. Data

the external auditory meatus). The measurement was taken were presented as means, standard deviations, and ranges to

in centimeters, by bringing the horizontal sliding bar to the summarize the anthropometric measurements. An independent

vertex [25]. Student’s t-test was used to test the differences between males

• Arm length (AL): Was measured as the distance between the and females for all variables. Pearson correlation coefficients

acromion (the most lateral point on the end of the acromial were calculated to measure the strength of correlation between

Sharaf El-Din, et al.: Prediction of stature based on upper limb measurements

stature and the upper limb measurements. Sex-specific simple different left upper limb measurements among Egyptian

and multiple linear regression equations for stature estimation population. Among males, it is observed that the highest value

were developed using the upper limb measurements. of r is exhibited by the arm length (AL) (0.844), whereas for

the index finger, the r value is the least, (0.309). At the same

Simple linear regression equations for estimation of stature were time, the arm length (AL) exhibits the overall highest value

formed for each of the measured parameter as: Y (stature) = of correlation (r = 0.801) with stature while ring finger length

a (constant) + b (regression coefficient of the independent (RFL) exhibits the least correlation (r = 0.383) with stature in

variable) X (individual variable) ± SEE (standard error of the females. All measurements presented statistically significant

estimate). The multiple regression models were derived as correlation coefficients with stature. Thus, stature is positively

Y (stature) = a (constant) + b1 (regression coefficient of the and significantly related to various upper limb measurements.

first variable) X1 (first variable) + b2 (regression coefficient of

the second variable) X2 (second variable) + -- bn (regression Simple Linear Regression

coefficient for the nth variables) Xn (nth variable) ± SEE.

A paired-samples t-test was used to compare the differences Tables 3 and 4 depict the simple linear regression equations for

between the actual and estimated means using different estimation of stature from left upper limb measurements for

equations. A P < 0.05 was considered significant. The accuracy males and females, respectively, in the Egyptian population.

of these equations was validated by determination coefficients Regression equations have been computed separately, for both

(r2 for bivariate analysis and R2 for multivariate analysis) and sexes and for each measurement of the upper limb. The tables

standard error of estimate (SEE). also exhibit standard error of estimate (SEE) and determination

coefficient (r2 for bivariate analysis and R2 for multivariate

RESULTS analysis). The standard error of estimate predicts the deviation

of estimated stature from the actual stature and a low value

Descriptive statistics indicates greater reliability and higher accuracy in the estimated

stature. In males, arm length (AL) provides the best estimate

The total of 500 healthy adult Egyptian Arab volunteers of stature as it exhibits the overall highest value of correlation

(250 males and 250 females) were studied for estimation of

stature by upper limb measurements, i.e. arm length (AL), Table 2: Correlation between stature and left upper limb

forearm length (FL), hand length (HL), hand breadth (HB), measurements

and fingers length. Table 1 shows descriptive statistics of stature Variable Males (n=250) Females (n=250)

in males and females. It is evident that the stature in males is (cm) r P value r P value

ranging from 162 to 185.5 cm with the mean of 174.59 cm and AL 0.844 <0.001 0.801 <0.001

standard deviation of 4.13 cm while, the stature in females is FL 0.643 <0.001 0.450 0.001

varied from 153 to 170 cm with the mean of 163.02 cm and HL 0.443 0.001 0.526 <0.001

standard deviation of 3.79 cm. As expected, the mean values HB 0.488 <0.001 0.406 0.003

IFL 0.309 0.029 0.434 0.002

of stature and left upper limb measurements for males were MFL 0.645 <0.001 0.534 <0.001

significantly higher than females. RFL 0.337 0.017 0.383 0.006

LFL 0.349 0.013 0.405 0.004

Table 2 displays the correlation coefficient values (r) of AL: Arm length, FL: Forearm length, HL: Hand length, HB: Hand

breadth, IFL: Index finger length, MFL: Middle finger length, RFL: Ring

finger length, LFL: Little finger length, r: Correlation coefficient, level of

Table 1: Descriptive statistics for ranges, means and SD of significance was set at P<0.05

left upper limb measurements along with stature in males and

females (all measurements are in cm) Table 3: Simple linear regression equations for stature

Variable Males (n=250) Females (n=250) P value estimation from left upper limb measurements in males

(cm) Range Mean±SD Range Mean±SD Variable Equation Y=a+bX ±SEE r2 t-statistic P value

Min. Max. Min. Max. (cm)

S 162 185.5 174.59±4.13 153 170 163.02±3.79 <0.001 AL S=108.06+1.966x (AL) 2.24 0.712 10.9 <0.001

AL 31 38 33.84±1.77 27.5 35 31.14±1.84 <0.001 FL S=126.07+1.661x (FL) 3.20 0.414 5.82 <0.001

FL 26 31 29.20±1.60 24 30 26.87±1.54 <0.001 HL S=142.72+1.543x (HL) 3.74 0.196 3.42 0.001

HL 19 25 20.66±1.18 16.8 20.8 18.50±0.86 <0.001 HB S=138.75+3.474x (HB) 3.65 0.238 3.87 <0.001

HB 9.5 11.2 10.31±0.58 7.7 10.2 8.90±0.53 <0.001 IFL S=156.61+2.296x (IFL) 3.97 0.096 2.25 0.029

IFL 7.1 9.5 7.83±0.55 6.1 8.2 7.21±0.46 <0.001 MFL S=128.52+5.301x (MFL) 3.19 0.416 5.85 <0.001

MFL 8 9.5 8.69±0.50 6.8 9 7.96±0.57 <0.001 RFL S=151.24+2.922x (RFL) 3.93 0.114 2.48 0.017

RFL 6.8 9 7.99±0.47 6.3 8.8 7.33±0.51 <0.001 LFL S=149.52+3.777x (LFL) 3.91 0.121 2.58 0.013

LFL 6 7.5 6.64±0.38 5.1 6.9 6.05±0.42 <0.001

S: Stature, AL: Arm length, FL: Forearm length, HL: Hand length,

S: Stature, AL: Arm length, FL: Forearm length, HL: Hand length, HB: Hand breadth, IFL: Index finger length, MFL: Middle finger length,

HB: Hand breadth, IFL: Index finger length, MFL: Middle finger length, RFL: Ring finger length, LFL: little finger length, SEE: Standard error

RFL: Ring finger length, LFL: Little finger length, Student’s t-test of estimate, r2: Coefficient of determination, Y: Stature, a: Constant,

is used to calculate P value; level of significance was set at P<0.05, b: Regression coefficient, X: Length of the predictor variable, Level of

SD: Standard deviation significance was set at P<0.05

Sharaf El-Din, et al.: Prediction of stature based on upper limb measurements

(SEE = ± 2.24). However, index finger length which exhibits the

highest error of estimate (3.97) and lowest value of r (0.309). In Estimation of stature is one of the important parameter

females, arm length also shows the highest value of correlation in medico-legal and forensic examinations when highly

(r = 0.801) and least value of standard error of estimate (SEE = decomposed and mutilated dead bodies with fragmentary

± 2.30) while, ring finger length shows the highest error of remains are brought for postmortem examination. In this

estimate (±3.54) and lowest value of correlation (r =0.383). So, situation, it becomes difficult to identify the deceased [3]; hence,

index finger length in males and ring finger length in females there is a need to more studies on the estimation of stature from

should be used only in the absence of the other measurements various body parts in different population groups [20]. Wilson

of the upper limb. The regression coefficients were found to be et al. [28] stated that it is essential for stature estimation to

statistically significant in all derived equations. The predictive use not only equations based on forensic statures but also

value, or coefficient of the determination, was greatest for the equations based on modern samples. Therefore, this study

reconstruction of stature from arm length in both sexes. was designed to investigate the relationship between some

upper limb measurements and stature in Egyptian population

Multiple Regression Analysis and to develop predictive equations to estimate stature of

an individual from some upper limb measurements. Eight

Multiple regression equations were formulated for males and left upper limb measurements and stature of adult Egyptian

females [Table 5]. The multiple regression equations revealed population volunteers were taken; the prediction of stature was

a lower standard error of estimate for males (± 2.39) and for derived through simple linear regression and multiple regression

females (± 2.45) as compared with the developed estimate analysis for males and females separately. The results of the

models utilizing different variables for males and females except present study demonstrated that the stature and recorded upper

that of arm length which is (± 2.24) for males and (± 2.30) limb measurements of males are significantly larger than those

for females. of females (P < 0.001). These results agree with the results of

other studies that have observed the same findings in different

Comparison between Actual and Estimated Stature populations [4,15,29-31]. This finding can be attributed to

the fact that males are genetically taller than females, and the

Comparisons of the actual stature and the estimated stature puberty occurs in females approximately 2 years earlier than in

from the upper limb measurements were performed utilizing males, and the earlier fusion of the epiphysis results in less time

simple and multiple regression equations [Tables 6 and 7]. for its growth. In addition, it is known that there is a relation

In both sexes, the mean value estimates were close to the actual between Y chromosome and stature [11,32].

stature, and there were no statistically significant differences

between them when utilizing different equations. The recorded upper arm lengths in adult Egyptian population

in the current study were longer than Sudanese [4] and shorter

Table 4: Simple linear regression equations for stature than those of the studied Iranian [30], but closer to those of

estimation from left upper limb measurements in females Bulgarians subjects [33] for males and females. At the same

time, the forearm lengths were greater than those of Turkish

Variable Equation Y=a+bX ±SEE r2 t-statistic P value

subjects [34] and Iranian subjects [30] and close to those of

AL S=111.6+1.65x (AL) 2.30 0.642 9.27 <0.001 studied Sudanese subjects [4]. Furthermore, the hand length

FL S=133.3+1.11x (FL) 3.43 0.203 3.49 0.001

HL S=120.34+2.31x (HL) 3.26 0.277 4.29 <0.001 and breadth of Egyptian subjects in the current study were found

HB S=137.42+2.875x (HB) 3.51 0.165 3.07 0.003 to be longer than those of Sudanese [4], West Australian [31],

IFL S=137.34+3.563x (IFL) 3.46 0.188 3.33 0.002 Turkish [34], Iranian [30], Mauritian [15], and Rajput Indian

MFL S=134.73+3.552x (MFL) 3.25 0.285 4.37 <0.001 population [10].

RFL S=142.1+2.852x (RFL) 3.54 0.147 2.88 0.006

LFL S=141.24+3.601x (LFL) 3.51 0.164 3.07 0.004

When lengths of index, middle and ring fingers in the left

S: Stature, AL: Arm length, FL: Forearm length, HL: Hand length, hand in this work were compared to other studies, it was found

HB: Hand breadth, IFL: Index finger length, MFL: Middle finger length, that their lengths were close to those of the West Australian

RFL: Ring finger length, LFL: Little finger length, SEE: Standard error

of estimate, r2: Coefficient of determination, Y: Stature, a: Constant, subjects [31] but longer than the Iranian populations. On the

b: Regression coefficient, X: Length of the predictor variable, level of other hand, the length of the little finger in the present work

significance was set at P<0.05 was shorter than the Iranian population [30].

Table 5: Multiple linear regression equations for the stature from left upper limb measurements in males and females

Sex Equation ±SEE r2 P value

Males (n=250) S=113+2.02x (AL)-0.189x (FL)+0.06x (HL)-1.38x (HB)-0.106x (IFL)+ 2.39 0.719 <0.001

1.78x (MFL)+1.23x (RFL)-1.92x (LFL)

Females (n=250) S=109.96+1.57 x (AL)-0.17x (FL)+0.125x (HL)+ 2.45 0.652 <0.001

0.43x (HB)+0.57x (IFL)+0.49x (MFL)-1.08x (RFL)+0.38x (LFL)

S: Stature, AL: Arm length, FL: Forearm length, HL: Hand length, HB: Hand breadth, IFL: Index finger length, MFL: Middle finger length, RFL: Ring

finger length, LFL: Little finger length, SEE: Standard error of estimate, r2: Coefficient of determination, Level of significance was set at P<0.05

Sharaf El-Din, et al.: Prediction of stature based on upper limb measurements

Table 6: Actual stature versus stature estimated from coefficient for upper arm length [34], and Sudanese males had

simple linear regression analysis in males and females a higher correlation coefficient for ulnar length [4].

(all measurements are in cm)

Variable Mean ±SD Min Max. Paired P value In the current study, the correlation coefficients of hand breadth

t-test and stature in males were greater than hand length while, in

Estimated females, the correlation coefficients of hand length and stature

stature (males) were greater than hand breadth. This finding indicates that hand

AL 174.62 3.46 169.0 182.8 0.085 0.932 length is more reliable than hand breadth for estimating stature

FL 174.66 2.60 169.3 177.6 0.141 0.888 among Egyptian females, which is in agreement with previous

HL 174.61 1.82 172.04 181.8 0.035 0.972

HB 174.63 1.99 171.8 177.7 0.067 0.947

results recorded for studied Sudanese [4], Upper Egyptian [32],

IFL 174.64 1.25 172.9 178.4 0.078 0.938 Iranian [30], Turkish [34], Indian [10,11], and West Australian

MFL 174.64 2.62 170.9 178.9 0.101 0.920 subjects [35].

RFL 174.65 1.30 171.1 177.5 0.100 0.921

LFL 174.55 1.48 172.2 177.8 0.092 0.927 Regarding the correlation between stature and fingers lengths in

Actual stature 174.59 4.13 162 185.5 -

Estimated

this study, middle finger length and stature was stronger in males

stature (females) (r = 0.645) than females (r = 0.534) while index finger length and

AL 163.05 3.06 157 169.4 0.082 0.935 stature was stronger in females than males (r = 0.434 for females; r

FL 163.08 1.67 159.8 166.5 0.105 0.917 =0.309 for males), ring finger (r =0.383 for females; r = 0.337 for

HL 163.07 1.97 159.1 168.3 0.081 0.936 males), and little finger (r=0.405 for females; r = 0.349 for males).

HB 163.08 1.52 159.6 166.7 0.104 0.918

So, the middle finger had the highest correlation coefficient

IFL 163.07 1.63 159.07 166.6 0.076 0.939

MFL 163.09 1.97 158.9 166.7 0.148 0.883 with stature in both sexes in this study. This is in agreement

RFL 163.07 1.42 160.07 167.2 0.092 0.927 with Iranian subjects [30] as the relation between middle

LFL 162.98 1.49 159.6 166.09 0.093 0.926 finger length and stature was stronger in males (r =0.674) than

Actual stature 163.02 3.79 153 170 - females (r = 0.644). At the same time, Sen et al. [27] revealed

S: Stature, AL: Arm length, FL: Forearm length, HL: Hand length, a statistically significant relationship in both genders between

HB: Hand breadth, IFL: Index finger length, MFL: Middle finger length, finger lengths and stature and concluded that the middle finger

RFL: Ring finger length, LFL: Little finger length, level of significance will give the exact height of the individual among all fingers.

was set at P<0.05, SD: Standard deviation On the other hand, Krishan et al. [36] estimated stature from

index and ring finger length in a North Indian population and

Table 7: Actual stature versus stature estimated from observed that stature can be estimated from these finger lengths

multiple linear regression analysis in males and females with a reasonable accuracy. This suggests that there is a genetic

(all measurements are in cm) difference between males and females and hence formula for one

Estimated stature using Mean actual Paired t-test P value sex cannot be applied for the other while estimating the stature.

multiple regression stature of

equations for males males

Standard error of estimate (SEE) is a good parameter to show

174.61±4.13 174.59±4.13 0.047 0.962 the relation between real value and estimated value and to assess

Estimated stature using Mean actual Paired t-test P value the accuracy of the simple regression equations using single

multiple regression stature of parameter, the SEE was the lowest for arm length measurements

equations for females females

in both sexes (SEE = ± 2.24 for males; SEE = ± 2.30 for

163.048±3.02 163.02±3.79 0.063 0.950 females). So, the arm length was found to be more predictive

Level of significance was set at P<0.05 than other upper limb measurements. This is in agreement

with several previous studies had found that all proximal limb

In the current study, the correlation coefficient between the bones are better predictors than distal limb bones [30,37].

stature and the upper limb measurements was found to be On the other hand, a study on Turkish males revealed that

highly significant and positively correlated, indicating that it is forearm length was found to be a better predictor than upper

possible to develop regression equations for the estimation of arm length [34]. The results obtained in this study for arm

stature from various upper limb measurements. The correlation length are more predictive than that found by Ahmed [4]

coefficient in this work was greatest between stature and arm (SEE = ±4.40 cm for males; 4.48 cm for females) and Ozaslan

length (r = 0.844 for males; r = 0.801 for females), which et al. [34] (SEE = ± 4.88 cm for males; 5.93 cm for females).

indicates that the upper arm length is a good predictor for

stature in both sexes. It was greater than that reported for Regarding hand measurements, the hand length presented

Sudanese [4], Iranian [30], and Turkish subjects [34]. lower standard error of estimate in Egyptian females

(SEE =± 3.26 cm) than hand breadth, while hand breadth

The present study revealed that males having higher correlation presented the lower standard error of estimate in Egyptian

coefficients for upper arm length, forearm length, hand breadth, males (SEE = ±3.65 cm) than hand length. This finding is

and middle finger length than females. On the other hand, different from other studies utilizing hand measurements that

females having higher correlation coefficients for hand length, showed comparable standard errors of estimates as hand length

index, ring, and little finger length than males. On the contrary presented the lowest standard error of estimate, such as those of

to these findings, the Turkish females had a higher correlation Ahmed, [4] (SEE = ± 5.01 cm for males; 4.53 cm for females),

Sharaf El-Din, et al.: Prediction of stature based on upper limb measurements

Krishan and Sharma, [10] (SEE = ± 5.17 cm for males; 3.82 cm 2. Kanchan T, Krishan K. Anthropometry of hand in sex determination

of dismembered remains - A review of literature. J Forensic Leg Med

for females), Agnihotri et al. [15] (SEE = ± 4.96 cm for males;

2011;18:14-7.

4.23 cm for females), Ishak et al. [31] (SEE = ± 4.74 cm 3. Krishan K. Estimation of stature from cephalo-facial anthropometry

for males; 5.10 cm for females), Habib and Kamal, [29] in North Indian population. Forensic Sci Int 2008;181:52.e1-6.

(SEE = ± 5.48 cm for males; 4.54 cm for females), and Ozaslan 4. Ahmed AA. Estimation of stature from the upper limb measurements

of Sudanese adults. Forensic Sci Int 2013;228:178.e1-7.

et al. [34] (SEE = ±5.62 cm for males; 6.06 cm for females). The 5. Menezes RG, Kanchan T, Kumar GP, Rao PP, Lobo SW, Uysal S, et al.

variation in observations can be attributed to the population Stature estimation from the length of the sternum in South Indian

and ethnic differences between the Egyptian population and males: A preliminary study. J Forensic Leg Med 2009;16:441-3.

the other populations in earlier studies. 6. Meadows L, Jantz RL. Estimation of stature from metacarpal lengths.

J Forensic Sci 1992;37:147-54.

7. Bidmos M, Asala S. Calcaneal measurement in estimation of stature

Regarding the multiple regression equations developed for of South African blacks. Am J Phys Anthropol 2005;126:335-42.

the upper limb dimensions, this study demonstrated a higher 8. Patil KR, Mody RN. Determination of sex by discriminant function

degree of prediction accuracy, as indicated by a lower SEE analysis and stature by regression analysis: A lateral cephalometric

study. Forensic Sci Int 2005;147:175-80.

(± 2.39-2.45 cm for males and females, respectively) and higher 9. Sanli SG, Kizilkanat ED, Boyan N, Ozsahin ET, Bozkir MG, Soames R,

R2 (0.665- 0.584 for males and females, respectively) as compared et al. Stature estimation based on hand length and foot length. Clin

with the developed estimate models utilizing different variables Anat 2005;18:589-96.

separately in simple linear regression for males and females 10. Krishan K, Sharma A. Estimation of stature from dimensions of

hands and feet in a North Indian population. J Forensic Leg Med

except that of arm length which is ± 2.24 for males and ± 2.30 2007;14:327-32.

for females indicated that the multiple regression equations are 11. Rastogi P, Nagesh KR, Yoganarasimha K. Estimation of stature

better indicators of stature estimation. Krishan and Sharma [10], from hand dimensions of north and south Indians. Leg Med (Tokyo)

2008;10:185-9.

Habib and Kamal [29], and Abdel-Malek et al. [32] demonstrated

12. Nor FM, Abdullah N, Mustapa AM, Qi Wen L, Faisal NA, Ahmad

increases in prediction accuracy when using multiple variables. At Nazari DA. Estimation of stature by using lower limb dimensions in

the same time, Rastogi et al. [11] suggested that when predicting the Malaysian population. J Forensic Leg Med 2013;20:947-52.

stature, multiple regression equations give more accurate results. 13. Laila SZ, Begum JA, Ferdousi R, Parveen S, Husain MS, Holy SZ, et al.

Anthropometric measurements of the arm span and their correlation

Furthermore, Ahmed [4] stated that when hand measurements

with the stature of Bangladeshi adult Muslim females. Mymensingh

were combined to develop a multiple regression models, the Med J 2010;19:561-4.

calculated SEE was ± 4.45 cm in males and 5 cm in females, 14. Krishan K, Kanchan T, Passi N. Estimation of stature from the foot

which is comparable to the developed simple linear models for and its segments in a sub-adult female population of North India.

J Foot Ankle Res 2011;4:24.

hand length (± 5.1 cm for males and 4.53 in females) and hand 15. Agnihotri AK, Agnihotri S, Jeebun N, Googoolye K. Prediction of

breadth (± 5.85 cm in males and 5.19 cm in females) [4]. On stature using hand dimensions. J Forensic Leg Med 2008;15:479-82.

the other hand, Ishak et al. [31] demonstrated an equivalent 16. Hunnargi SA, Menezes RG, Kanchan T, Lobo SW, Uysal S, Herekar NG,

degree of prediction accuracy (± 4.74 cm) in multiple regression et al. Sternal index: Is it a reliable indicator of sex in the Maharashtrian

population of India? J Forensic Leg Med 2009;16:56-8.

models compared to the simple linear models. 17. Kanchan T, Menezes RG, Moudgil R, Kaur R, Kotian MS, Garg RK.

Stature estimation from foot length using universal regression

CONCLUSION formula in a North Indian population. J Forensic Sci 2010;55:163-6.

18. Lundy JK. The mathematical versus anatomical methods of stature

estimate from long bones. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1985;6:73-6.

Estimation of stature from limbs or dismembered body parts is of 19. Maijanen H. Testing anatomical methods for stature estimation

great importance to forensic experts and anthropologists. In the on individuals from the W. M. Bass donated skeletal collection.

present research, there is a strong relationship between stature J Forensic Sci 2009;54:746-52.

20. Krishan K, Kanchan T, Sharma A. Multiplication factor versus

and upper limb measurements. Eight regression equations regression analysis in stature estimation from hand and foot

derived can be used accurately to estimate the stature from dimensions. J Forensic Leg Med 2012;19:211-4.

upper limb measurements in the adult Egyptian population. No 21. Iscan MY. Forensic anthropology of sex and body size. Forensic Sci

significant difference between measured and estimated stature Int 2005;147:107-12.

22. Roche AF, Davila GH. Late adolescent growth in stature. Pediatrics

from upper limb measurements were found. The obtained 1972;50:874-80.

equations are specific to the adult Egyptian population; 23. Trotter M, Gleser G. The effect of ageing on stature. Am J Phys

therefore, application of these by the other populations Anthropol 1951;9:311-24.

24. Krishan K, Kanchan T, Menezes RG, Ghosh A. Forensic anthropology

might result in incorrect results. It is hoped that the equation

casework essential methodological considerations in stature

formulae would help in forensic identification when only some estimation. J Forensic Nurs 2012;8:45-50.

remains of the body are found. In addition to the medico-legal 25. Vallois HV. Anthropometric techniques. Curr Anthropol 1965;6:127-44.

implications of this study; it may be useful for the clinician in 26. Martin AD, Carter JE, Hendy KC, Malina RM. Segment lengths.

In: Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R, editors. Anthropometric

plastic and reconstructive surgery, anatomists, archeologists, and Standardization Reference Manual. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics;

anthropologist. Further researches on the Egyptian population 1988. p. 9-26.

with different age groups are recommended. 27. Sen J, Kanchan T, Ghosh A, Mondal N, Krishan K. Estimation of

stature from lengths of index and ring fingers in a North-eastern

Indian population. J Forensic Leg Med 2014;22:10-5.

REFERENCES 28. Wilson RJ, Herrmann NP, Jantz LM. Evaluation of stature estimation

from the database for forensic anthropology. J Forensic Sci

1. Kanchan T, Menezes RG, Moudgil R, Kaur R, Kotian MS, GargRK. 2010;55:684-9.

Stature estimation from foot dimensions. Forensic Sci Int 29. Habib SR, Kamal NN. Stature estimation from hand and phalanges

2008;179:241.e1-5. lengths of Egyptians. J Forensic Leg Med 2010;17:156-60.

Sharaf El-Din, et al.: Prediction of stature based on upper limb measurements

30. Akhlaghi M, Hajibeygi M, Zamani N, Moradi B. Estimation of stature cranial sutures in a South Indian male population” by P. P. J. Rao et al.

from upper limb anthropometry in Iranian population. J Forensic Leg Int J Legal Med 2011;125:469-71.

Med 2012;19:280-4. 36. Krishan K, Kanchan T, Asha N. Estimation of stature from index and

31. Ishak NI, Hemy N, Franklin D. Estimation of stature from hand and ring finger length in a North Indian adolescent population. J Forensic

handprint dimensions in a Western Australian population. Forensic Leg Med 2012;19:285-90.

Sci Int 2012;216:199.e1-7. 37. Vercellotti G, Agnew AM, Justus HM, Sciulli PW. Stature estimation

32. Abdel-Malek AK, Ahmed AM, el-Sharkawi SA, el-Hamid NA. Prediction in an early medieval (XI-XII c.) Polish population: Testing the accuracy

of stature from hand measurements. Forensic Sci Int 1990;46:181-7. of regression equations in a bioarcheological sample. Am J Phys

33. Radoinova D, Tenekedjiev K, Yordanov Y. Stature estimation from Anthropol 2009;140:135-42.

long bone lengths in Bulgarians. Homo 2002;52:221-32.

34. Ozaslan A, Koç S, Ozaslan I, Tugcu H. Estimation of stature from

upper extremity. Mil Med 2006;171:288-91. Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None declared.

35. Reed JC, Algee-Hewitt BF. Comments on “Estimation of stature from

- 10.0000@Psycnet.apa.Org@Journals@Amp@34@7@571Uploaded bymaslinovik5003
- Business Statistics 42petwkAWtUploaded byRanojay Ghosh
- Transformations of VariablesUploaded byFranco Imperial
- SingleConstantKM-2007Uploaded byManish Kapadia
- Sample JournalUploaded byDomingo Ramil
- peni2010.pdfUploaded bymuhammadfaisal244
- Multiple Regression AnalysisUploaded byhayati5823
- Applied Regression Analysis - STAT 225 Z1 - Course Syllabus or Other Course-Related DocumentUploaded byContinuing Education at the University of Vermont
- maccallum_on_dichotomizing.pdfUploaded byNicole Olsen
- InfluenceUploaded byjayroldparcede
- Chapter 3 NotesUploaded byPete Jacopo Belbo Caya
- Out-Of-Trend Identification and Removal in Stability ModellingUploaded byJose Cortés
- Module 2 SlrUploaded byjuntujuntu
- Econometrics 1Uploaded byleonardmakuvaza
- Chapter 11Uploaded byDaniel Li
- level-2-r-11Uploaded byQuyen
- Ch 17 Correlation vs RegressionUploaded byDottie Kamellia
- Econometrics_ch2.pptUploaded byMuhammad Hassan Khan
- Predict the v and Depth of Lake 2011Uploaded byPrince Sultan
- ptest2Uploaded byHumaira Farhat
- Investigate The Relationship Between Customers' Cultural Capital And Decision To Buy Foreign Goods(Case Study Border Market Marivan)Uploaded byAJER JOURNAL
- A577CD017017.pdfUploaded byjnf
- MB Lecture 2Uploaded byrui
- A Handbook of Statistical AnalysesUploaded byRenhoArdyansyah
- CHAP 11.pptUploaded bySenelwa Anaya
- lecture2.621Uploaded byRui Magalhães
- Solution InsuranceUploaded byNirmal Patel
- 22 PresentationUploaded byace
- mohamed2002.pdfUploaded byMaria Corbu
- 2014_Ch.17_NotesUploaded byFaith

- 2014The Demand Elasticity of Mobile Telephones in the Middle EastUploaded byVishnu Vm
- Rasyied et al Tea digestion.pdfUploaded byRosita Wahyuningrum
- lab2 (1)Uploaded bynurliyanaamin
- D13_Pauls MESURING BIAS.pptUploaded bymanuel
- 4Uploaded byAnonymous 3hrzMH7
- DONE QMB 2100.001 Basic Business Statistics - Practice Test #2Uploaded byXinxin Sweetness
- Chapter 3 Study Guide (1)Uploaded byreema
- Brix DeterminationUploaded bymalaya tripathy
- Ajetunmobi, Olajide Making Sense of Critical AppraisalUploaded byGaurav Jaswal
- Basic Statistical Concepts and MethodsUploaded byBliss Man
- Potter-Same-sex Parents Families and Childrens Academic AchievementUploaded byIgnacio Vicente Suazo
- Question Bank on Z transforms.docxUploaded byvignanaraj
- Ex2 Probability.docxUploaded bynatp
- New Microsoft Office Word Document (10)Uploaded byసురేంద్ర కారంపూడి
- confidence interval.pdfUploaded byMaiah Dinglasan
- iet 603 700 final exam gradedUploaded byapi-285292212
- Chapter4- Normal Distribution Part 1Uploaded byapi-3729261
- SPC CalculationsUploaded byVinoth Kumar
- Standardised Regression Coefficient-metaanalysisUploaded byJasleen Kaur
- 7127 − 13Uploaded byRajib Barua
- Q8-IM13CFinalUploaded byJb Macaroco
- Ultimate CISA Study Guide in EasyFAQs Ver 3[1].0Uploaded bywaleshadow
- Six Sigma Sample QuestionsUploaded bybreezeee
- 13. Instructional Effects on Critical Thinking Performance on Ill-Defined IssuesUploaded byShofyan Adi Prasetyo
- ANCOVA_R.pdfUploaded byLuis Luengo Machuca
- Consumer Satisfaction Dissatisfaction and Post-purUploaded byBosco Sylvester
- jurnal pblUploaded byyulfa
- ASTM D1895 (Densidad aparente).pdfUploaded bywilloppi
- Aiha Journal = Industrial HygieneUploaded byEderson Guimaraes
- Statistical Analysis of Data with report writingUploaded byUsmansiddiq1