Professional Documents
Culture Documents
•Supervisors
•External analysts
Nature of Job Analysis
1. Human Resource Planning
2. Recruitment
3. Selection
4. Placement & Orientation
5. Training
6. Counseling
7. Employee Safety
8. Performance Appraisal
9. Job Design & redesign
10. Job Evaluation
Job Analysis Techniques
It is helpful to spend several minutes prior to collecting job analysis information explaining the process
that you will be following.
Seven general techniques are generally used to collect job analysis data;
❖ Job performance: The analyst actually performs the job and collects the needed information
❖ Personal observation: The analyst observes others doing the job and writes a summary
❖ Critical incidents: Job incumbents describe several incidents relating to work, based on past
experience; the analyst collects, analyses and classifies data.
❖ Interview: Job incumbents and supervisors are interviewed to get the most essential information
about a job
Cont…
❖ Panel of experts: Experienced people such as job incumbents and supervisors
with good knowledge of the job asked to provide the information.
❖ Diary method: Job incumbents asked to maintain diaries or logs of their daily job
activities and record the time spent and nature of work carried out.
❖ Questionnaire method: Job incumbents approached through a properly designed
questionnaire and asked to provide details.
❖ The Position Analysis Questionnaire: It is a standardised form used to collect
specific information about job tasks and worker traits.
❖ Management Position Description Questionnaire: It is a standardised form
designed to analyse managerial jobs
JOB DESIGN
• It involves conscious efforts to organise tasks, duties and responsibilities into a
unit of work to achieve certain objectives.
• Job evaluation, begins with job analysis and ends at that point where
the worth of a job is ascertained for achieving pay equity between
jobs.
B. Classification method: The job classification method slots jobs into pre-established grades. Jobs
with high grade demand more responsibilities, tougher working conditions and varied job duties.
This method is easy to understand and takes care of all relevant factors affecting the performance of a
job.
C. Factor comparison method: In this method, jobs are ranked according to a series of factors such as
mental effort, physical effort, skill needed, responsibility, supervisory responsibility, working
conditions, etc. pay will be assigned in this method by comparing the weights of the factors required
for each job.
An example of factor comparison method
Suppose the job of a painter is found to be similar to electrician in skill (15), fitter in mental effort (10),
welder in physical effort (12), cleaner in responsibility (6) and labourer in working conditions (4) then the
wage for the job would be 47.
Cont…
D. Point method: The point system of job evaluation uses a point scheme based on the compensable
job factors of skill, effort, responsibility and working conditions. The more compensable factors a
job possesses, the more points are assigned to it. Jobs with higher accumulated points are considered
more valuable to the organization.
❖ Identify the factors to all identified jobs such as skill, effort, responsibility etc.
❖ Divide each major factor into a number of sub factors. Each sub factor is defined and expressed
in order of importance.
❖ Once the worth of a job in terms of total points is known, the points are converted into money
values, keeping the wage rates in mind.
A Comparative Picture of Major Job
Evaluation Methods