Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Using a polyacrylamide gel method, phase pure and well-dispersed MgTiO3 nanopowders were prepared
Received 23 November 2017 at 800 °C for 2 h. It was found that a high mole ratio of monomers to precursors resulted in low formation
Revised 23 January 2018 temperature of MgTiO3, due to the highly mixing homogeneity and smaller particle sizes of precursors.
Accepted 31 January 2018
Sintering behaviors of MgTiO3 nanopowders under DC electric field from 500 to 800 V/cm were investi-
Available online 6 February 2018
gated. Nearly full dense MgTiO3 ceramics can be prepared in 30 s. An abrupt and simultaneous increase in
current density and power dissipation were observed in sintering process, which are characteristics of
Keywords:
flash sintering. The power dissipation for the flash sintering was found to be 82 mW/mm3. The densities
Magnesium titanate
Nanopowders
and average grain sizes of samples increase with the increase of the electrical field strength. It was sug-
Polyacrylamide gel method gested that Joule heating was the main mechanism of flash sintering of MgTiO3 ceramics. Our work pro-
Flash sintering vides a useful route for the fabrication of dense MgTiO3 ceramics at low temperature in short time.
Ó 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction and TiO2 powders at 1100 °C in air [16]. However, there is still
secondary phase existed in the prepared sample. Therefore, it is
Magnesium titanate (MgTiO3) ceramic is a well-known dielec- important to prevent the formation of MgTi2O5 during the syn-
tric material applicable to microwave devices and systems due to thetic process, and at the same time to lower the sintering temper-
its excellent dielectric properties [1–3]. Several approaches for ature for the fabrication of high quality MgTiO3 ceramics.
the synthesis of MgTiO3 powders have been developed, such as In the last several years, a novel sintering technology called
solid-state reaction method [4,5], sol-gel method [6–8], auto- flash sintering has attracted worldwide attentions, because of its
igniting combustion technique [9], solar physical vapor deposition low sintering temperature and high densification rate [17–20].
[10,11] and electrodeposition [12]. Solid-state reaction method is a Flash sintering gives us an opportunity to fabricate dense MgTiO3
simple and cost-effective approach to prepare MgTiO3 powders. ceramics at low sintering temperature in short time.
However, a metastable phase MgTi2O5 usually appears in the final In this work, a polyacrylamide gel method combined with the
products. MgTi2O5 as a secondary phase can worsen the dielectric flashing sintering is used for the fabrication of MgTiO3 ceramics
properties of the MgTiO3 ceramics [13], so MgTi2O5 should be at low temperature. The polyacrylamide gel method is employed
avoided using the solid-state reaction method. Other methods, to prepare high pure and well-dispersed MgTiO3 nanopowders.
such as sol-gel method, auto-igniting combustion technique, solar The preparation conditions including the mole ratio of acrylamide
physical vapor deposition and electrodeposition, are complicated to precursor and the calcination temperature have been systemat-
and not suitable for large-scale production. Therefore, a facile syn- ically investigated. In addition, the sintering behaviors of
thetic method to prepare pure MgTiO3 powders is needed to be as-obtained MgTiO3 nanopowders under a DC electrical field are
developed. In addition, the sintering temperature of MgTiO3 is high studied. Finally, the flash sintering mechanism is discussed and
to above 1400 °C, which is high energy consuming. In order to an interpretation with Joule heating is proposed.
lower the densification temperature, sintering aids are usually
used [14,15]. However, the unexpected secondary phase is formed
2. Experimental procedure
during the sintering process, which deteriorates the dielectric
properties of the MgTiO3. Very recently, Apostol et al. obtained
2.1. Preparation of MgTiO3 nanopowders
MgTiO3 geikielite major phase by solar sintering mixture of MgO
Titanium sulfate (Ti(SO4)2), magnesium nitrate (Mg(NO3)26H2O),
⇑ Corresponding author. acrylamide (AM), N,N’-methylene-bis-acrylamide (MBAM), and
E-mail address: suxinghua@chd.edu.cn (X. Su). ammonium persulfate ((NH4)2S2O8) were used as raw materials.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.316
0169-4332/Ó 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
X. Su et al. / Applied Surface Science 442 (2018) 12–19 13
The as-prepared MgTiO3 nanopowders were mixed with 5 wt% Fig. 1. DTA-TGA curves for the xerogel with an acrylamide to MgTiO3 mole ratio of
PVA binder in aqueous solution. Then the mixed nanopowders 120.
were grounded and uniaxially pressed into dog bone-shaped green
compacts at a pressure of 300 MPa. The green compact had a rect- on the TGA curve, revealing complete removal of the organic
angular gauge section with a length of 20 mm, width of 3 mm, and species.
thickness of 0.90 ± 0.05 mm. These green compacts were pre- XRD patterns of the samples prepared by calcining the xerogel
sintered at 700 °C for 1 h to burn out the PVA binder and to allow with A:MT mole ratio of 30 at different temperatures are shown
easier handling for successive flash sintering experiments. Then in Fig. 2. At 600 °C, there are only some weak and broaden diffrac-
the green compact was suspended with platinum wires and plat-
inum paste was used to ensure good electrical contact. Flash sin-
tering experiments were performed in a tubular furnace by
applying different DC electrical field strengths (500, 600, 700,
and 800 V/cm) with a heating rate of 10 °C/min; the power control
switched from constant voltage mode to constant current mode
when the current reached a preset maximum value of 100 mA;
samples were hold for 30 s at the constant current mode. The volt-
age was applied using HPS 0614 power supply (Lanyi, China); the
current through the circuit was measured using DMM 4040 digital
multimeter (Tektronix, USA).
2.3. Characterization
Fig. 4. XRD patterns of powders obtained by calcining the xerogel with an A:MT
mole ratio of 120 at different temperatures.
Fig. 5. SEM images and particle size distributions of the MgTiO3 nanopowders obtained by calcining the xerogel with an A:MT mole ratio of 60 (a, c), and 120 (b, d) at 800 °C.
X. Su et al. / Applied Surface Science 442 (2018) 12–19 15
Fig. 8. SEM surface and cross section images of the samples sintered at different electrical fields: (a, b) 500 V/cm, (c, d) 600 V/cm, (e, f) 700 V/cm, (g, h) 800 V/cm.
16 X. Su et al. / Applied Surface Science 442 (2018) 12–19
nanopowder with an average particle size of 66 nm is sintered at declines sharply to a steady state. A spike with a width of about 2 s
high temperature of 1400 °C without an electrical field for 30 s. is observed. At the steady state, the power dissipations are about
The surface morphology of the sample is shown in Fig. 10. It can 35, 58, 88 and 102 W for the electrical fields of 500, 600, 700 and
be seen that the sample has a porous structure with a relative den- 800 V/cm, respectively. Clearly, the power dissipation at the steady
sity is 82%, lower than that obtained by flash sintering. state increases with increasing the electrical field.
The specific power dissipation as a function of the furnace tem- Joule heating is an important effect that accompanies the flash
perature at various electrical fields is shown in Fig. 11. The curves sintering. Due to the Joule heating, the actual sample temperature
can be categorized into two different regions: in the region of the increases with the dissipation of electrical power energy. The
power dissipation lower than 82 mW/mm3, the curves show a lin- increase of the temperature is calculated using a black body radia-
early Arrhenius profile, which is a conventional sintering behavior tion model. The calculation is based on the following equation
under the electrical field; in the region of the power dissipation [40]:
higher than 82 mW/mm3, the curves show a line vertical to the 1=4
axis, which is consistent with the results of previous reports [30– W
T ¼ T 40 þ ð1Þ
32]. It is well known that flash sintering is characterized by an Ar
onset of the power-surge, and an abrupt increase of the electrical
where T is the actual sample temperature, and T 0 is the furnace
conductivity, as indicated in Fig. 7. It is therefore concluded that
temperature, A is the surface area of sample, which is
the flash sintering of MgTiO3 nanopowders occurs when the power
dissipation is approximately 82 mW/mm3. According to the previ- 1:614 104 m2 in this experiment, r is the black body radiation
ous reports, for electrically conducting, semiconducting and dielec- constant, which equals to 5:67 108 W=m2 K4 , W is the electrical
tric materials, the flash sintering occurs when the power power dissipation at steady state during the flash sintering. Using
dissipation is in the range of 10–50 mW/mm3 [33–38]. It is recog- the Eq. (1), the actual sample temperature of MgTiO3 is estimated
nized that effects of electrical field to the flash sintering can vary and reported in Table 2 and Fig. 13. In our experiments, the power
significantly for different materials systems [39]. Since MgTiO3 is dissipation increases with increasing the electrical field strength.
an insulating material, it may lead to a higher onset of the Consequently, although the furnace temperature at the onset of
power-surge for flash sintering. the flash sintering decreases when the electrical field strength is
Fig. 12 illustrates the power dissipation against time curves for increased, the actual sample temperature increases. The function
a holding duration of 30 s after the occurrence of flash sintering of the electrical field and estimated temperature (actual sample
under different electrical fields with a current limit of 100 mA. temperature) reveals a linear relationship, as shown in Fig. 13.
Obviously, the power dissipation rises abruptly to a limited maxi- When the electrical field is 500, 600, 700, and 800 V/cm, the esti-
mum value. Nearly instantaneously, the power supply switches mated sample temperature is 1463, 1565, 1653, and 1695 °C,
from voltage control to current control. Then the power dissipation respectively, which are high enough to sinter MgTiO3 ceramics.
Fig. 12. Power dissipation against time curve for a duration of 30 s after the occurrence of flash sintering under a DC electrical field of 500 (a), 600 (b), 700 (c), and 800 V/cm
(d), with a current limit of 100 mA.
18 X. Su et al. / Applied Surface Science 442 (2018) 12–19
References
[26] E. Zapata-Solvas, S. Bonilla, P.R. Wilshaw, R.I. Todd, Preliminary investigation [34] M. Cologna, J.S.C. Francis, R. Raj, Field assisted and flash sintering of alumina
of flash sintering of SiC, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 33 (2013) 2811–2816. and its relationship to conductivity and MgO-doping, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 31
[27] Y. Liu, X. Hao, Z. Wang, J. Wang, J. Qiao, Y. Yan, K. Sun, A newly-developed (2011) 2827–2837.
effective direct current assisted sintering technique for electrolyte film [35] A. Karakuscu, M. Cologna, D. Yarotski, J. Won, J.S.C. Francis, R. Raj, B.P.
densification of anode-supported solid oxide fuel cells, J. Power Sources 215 Uberuaga, Defect structure of flash-sintered strontium titanate, J. Am. Ceram.
(2012) 296–300. Soc. 95 (2012) 2531–2536.
[28] D. Yang, R. Raj, H. Conrad, Enhanced sintering rate of zirconia (3Y-TZP) through [36] S.K. Jha, R. Raj, The effect of electric field on sintering and electrical
the effect of a weak DC electric field on grain growth, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 93 conductivity of titania, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 97 (2014) 527–534.
(2010) 2935–2937. [37] H. Yoshida, Y. Sakka, T. Yamamoto, J.-M. Lebrun, R. Raj, Densification behavior
[29] S. Ghosh, A.H. Chokshi, P. Lee, R. Raj, A huge effect of weak dc electrical and microstructural development in undoped yttria prepared by flash-
fields on grain growth in zirconia, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 92 (2009) 1856– sintering, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 34 (2014) 991–1000.
1859. [38] J.-C. M’Peko, J.S.C. Francis, R. Raj, Field-assisted sintering of undoped BaTiO3:
[30] M. Biesuz, V.M. Sglavo, Flash sintering of alumina: Effect of different operating microstructure evolution and dielectric permittivity, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 34
conditions on densification, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 36 (2016) 2535–2542. (2014) 3655–13600.
[31] J.S.C. Francis, R. Raj, Flash-sinterforging of nanograin zirconia: field assisted [39] Y. Zhang, J. Nie, J.M. Chan, J. Luo, Probing the densification mechanisms during
sintering and superplasticity, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 95 (2012) 138–146. flash sintering of ZnO, Acta Mater. 125 (2017) 465–475.
[32] K.S. Naik, V.M. Sglavo, R. Raj, Field assisted sintering of ceramic constituted by [40] R. Raj, Joule heating during flash-sintering, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 32 (2012) 2293–
alumina and yttria stabilized zirconia, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 34 (2014) 2435– 2301.
2442. [41] T. Jiang, Y. Liu, Z. Wang, W. Sun, J. Qiao, K. Sun, An improved direct current
[33] J.A. Downs, V.M. Sglavo, Electric field assisted sintering of cubic zirconia at 390 sintering technique for proton conductor-BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.1Yb0.1O3: The effect of
°C, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 96 (2011) 1342–1344. direct current on sintering process, J. Power Sources 248 (2014) 70–76.