You are on page 1of 5

Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.

com>

Recent correspondence
Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at
Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.com>
2:12 PM
To: NewYorkComplaints Dojoig <dojoig.newyorkcomplaints@usdoj.gov>
Cc: theresa.watson3@usdoj.gov, andrew.lelling@usdoj.gov, christina.sterling@usdoj.gov,
mary.murrane@usdoj.gov, "Constituent.services@state.ma.us" <constituent.services@state.ma.us>,
elizabeth_warren@warren.senate.gov, Nora_Keefe@warren.senate.gov,
Nairoby_Gabriel@warren.senate.gov, sydney_levin-epstein@markey.senate.gov,
lori.trahan@mail.house.gov

Dear Inspector General Horowitz,

This communication is respectfully delivered to your direct attention in response to an email I received
from the Investigations Division on Friday, February 8, 2019 (Scroll down to view the referenced
email including the attached correspondence entitled, "Mohan Harihar.pdf"). The correspondence
(Dated December 19, 2018) references a single email sent by me on November 15, 2018 entitled,
" Filed SCOTUS Petition for STAY of Judgment, HARIHAR v US BANK et al, Appeal No. 17-
1381." (Scroll down to view the attached 11/15/18 email, in its entirety.) As you will see, the email
was directed to the attention of representing counsel for the Appellees/Defendants associated with
HARIHAR v US BANK et al (Appeal No. 17-1381). The OIG was one (1) of the parties copied on this
email, in addition to: (1) Governor Charlie Baker (R-MA); (2) US Attorney Andrew Lelling (MA)
and counsel associated with the related litigation HARIHAR v The United States (Appeal No.
17-2074); and (3) Members of Congress - specifically, US Senator Elizabeth Warren, US
Senator Ed Markey and former US Congresswoman Niki Tsongas. This is merely one (1) of
many emails that your office has been copied on - over the past five (5) years involving the
referenced (and other related) litigation.

You are aware that this referenced litigation has raised evidenced civil and criminal claims against
fourteen (14) Defendants including the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and separately against The
United States (Appeal No. 17-2074). As a matter of record, the EVIDENCED list of claims include: (1)
RICO violations; (2) Fraud on the Court; (3) Economic Espionage; (4) Color of Law/Due
Process violations; (5) Conspiracy claims and a host of others. This litigation has also exposed
what is now being considered one of the largest cases of judicial fraud in the history of The United
States. Judicial misconduct complaints have been formally filed against FIFTEEN (15) Federal (First
Circuit and District Court) Judges. There has been an UNPRECEDENTED EIGHT (8) Federal
RECUSALS - and TREASON claims have formally been filed under ARTICLE III against NINE (9)
Federal Judges for continuing to rule after losing jurisdiction. This litigation has clearly
evidenced (in full Public view) a broken system for addressing judicial misconduct, making it
necessary to regularly inform/update: (1) POTUS; (2) The Administrative Office of US Courts -
specifically, Director James C. Duff; (3) The House/Senate Judiciary Committees; (4) The Federal
Bureau of Investigation (FBI); (5) The Department of Justice (DOJ) and others.

You are aware that as a matter of record, evidenced Criminal complaints have long been filed (and
updated) with the FBI and DOJ against all referenced litigants AND judicial officers. However, NO
CORRECTIVE ACTION has been initiated. Upon reviewing the email correspondence received this
past Friday, your Investigations Divisions stated, "The matters you raised are outside our
investigative jurisdiction, therefore no action can be taken by our office..." This correspondence
appears (at least on its surface) to indicate either:

1. The Investigations Division has failed by not thoroughly investigating the actions (or lack
thereof) of FBI/DOJ personnel overseeing these criminal complaints, including their
subsequent failure(s) to bring criminal indictments; or
2. The Investigations Division has chosen NOT to investigate at all, intentionally turning a "blind
eye" to these evidenced criminal claims - therefore showing cause to question the integrity of
your office.

Based on my interpretation of the law - at minimum, it appears that either one (or both) is true,
showing cause to expand upon (or to file NEW) existing claims against The United States including:

1. Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 - Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law;
2. Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 Conspiracy Against Rights;
3. Title 18, U.S.C., Section 1001 Fraud and False Statements;
4. Due Process violations and others.

Please be advised, STAY Application No. 18A554 - HARIHAR v US BANK et al, has been
distributed by Chief Justice Roberts for the February 15, 2019 SCOTUS Conference. Also,
Petition 18-7752 for a Writ of Certiorari has been docketed with the US Supreme Court. It now
becomes necessary to timely file a supplement(s) to these documents with SCOTUS, informing the
Court of this recent development. Since the evidenced criminal claims are perceived to impact
matters of National Security, the following government offices/agencies/committees will necessarily
be copied (via email, US Mail and/or social media):

1. POTUS (via www.whitehouse.gov);


2. US Secret Service/Homeland Security;
3. Department of Justice (DOJ) - specifically, acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker;
4. House/Senate Judiciary Committees;
5. Governor Charlie Baker (R-MA);
6. US Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA);
7. US Senator Ed Markey (D-MA); and
8. US Congresswoman Lori Trahan (D-MA);

Copies of this email will also be made available to the Public and to media outlets nationwide out of
continued concerns for my personal safety and security. If you have any questions regarding any
portion of this email, or require additional information, please advise.

Respectfully submitted,

Mohan A. Harihar
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526
Mo.harihar@gmail.com
[Quoted text hidden]
2 attachments
Mohan Harihar.pdf
37K
HARIHAR Email - Nov 15 2018.pdf
101K
Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.com>

Filed SCOTUS Petition for STAY of Judgment, HARIHAR v US BANK et


al, Appeal No. 17-1381
Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.com> Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 3:05 PM
To: maura.healey@state.ma.us

---------- Forwarded message ---------


From: Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 12:40 PM
Subject: Filed SCOTUS Petition for STAY of Judgment, HARIHAR v US BANK et al, Appeal No. 17-
1381
To: <jesse.boodoo@state.ma.us>, <kevin.polansky@nelsonmullins.com>, Murphy, Matthew T.
<mmurphy@casneredwards.com>, Jeffrey B. Loeb <JLoeb@richmaylaw.com>,
<kmchugh@harmonlaw.com>, david fialkow <david.fialkow@klgates.com>
Cc: NewYorkComplaints Dojoig <dojoig.newyorkcomplaints@usdoj.gov>,
Constituent.services@state.ma.us <constituent.services@state.ma.us>,
<andrew.lelling@usdoj.gov>, <mary.murrane@usdoj.gov>, <christina.sterling@usdoj.gov>,
<tips@fbi.gov>, <elizabeth_warren@warren.senate.gov>, <Nairoby_Gabriel@warren.senate.gov>,
<scheduling@warren.senate.gov>, <sydney_levin-epstein@markey.senate.gov>,
<june.black@mail.house.gov>

To All Referenced Appellees/Defendants,

Attached, please find the following court documents expected to be filed with the United States
Supreme Court today, November 15, 2018:

1. SCOTUS Clerk Correspondence;


2. Harihar SCOTUS Petition for STAY of Judgment;
3. Appendix

Hardcopies of the referenced filing are being mailed to counsel's last known addresses of record.
Additionally, please be advised that the related MA Land Court hearing (which took place on
October 30, 2018) has evidenced a recorded transcript(s) of judicial misconduct by the presiding
Land Court Judge - Michael Vhay. Therefore, the Appellant/Petitioner - shows cause (at minimum) to:
(1) expand upon the evidenced judicial misconduct claims against Appellee - Commonwealth of
Massachusetts; and (2) amend the original complaint(s) associated with this Appeal No. 17-1381
(and related Federal/State litigation). Since all Appellees/Defendants (as a matter of record) have
maintained the position NOT to consider entering into settlement discussions, the
Appellant/Petitioner's pursuit of maximum civil/criminal/professional penalties will continue against
ALL parties regardless of timeline, as previously communicated.

Please be advised - based on the Petitioner’s interpretation of the Federal Law, and considering a
portion of his evidenced claims pertain to: (1) Criminal misconduct involving judicial officers; (2)
Economic Espionage and (3) matters believed to impact National Security, parties copied on this
email (or via social media) include POTUS (via www.whitehouse.gov), the DOJ, FBI, OIG, Gov.
Charlie Baker (R-MA) and members of Congress. A copy will also be made available to Media outlets
nationwide and to the Public out of continued concerns for the Petitioner’s safety and security.

Respectfully,

Mohan A. Harihar
Plaintiff
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526 (Mobile)
mo.harihar@gmail.com

3 attachments
SCOTUS Clerk Correspondence.pdf
37K
Harihar SCOTUS Petition for STAY.pdf
127K
Appendix - SCOTUS Motion for Stay.pdf
1964K