Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
Work and Energy
(Fig. 1b in which typical values for
u are: 30 MPa ≤ u ≤ 50 MPa). An The principle of conservation of
elastic modulus of E = 22,000 MPa energy is fundamentally important
and Poisson ratio of = 0.15 are in structural analysis. This
typical for concrete. In using principle, expressed as energy or
concrete for analysis, the ACI code work balance, is applicable to both
specifies using the gross cross rigid and deformable structures.
area properties to perform Rigid structures only require
analyses to determine the force multiplying the external forces by
distributions in frame structures, the respective displacements.
i.e., ignore the reinforcing steel Deformable structures also require
and tension cracking in calculating the summation of the internal
the force distributions. stresses acting through the
5 6
dW Fd (1)
1 1
k 1 2 F1 1 (3)
2 2
Over 1, the total work is F
1 F1
W 0 Fd (2)
k
7
1 8
2
Expanding to a vector of forces
where U = strain energy for the
and displacements leads to
element. Equation (5) is a
1 homogeneous, quadratic polyno-
W F {} (4)
2
mial in terms of the local coor-
The special case shown dinate element displacements {u}
in the right figure: or global coordinate element
u 1
displacement {v}.
W 12 Fx 0 Fx u
v 2
3
The principle of virtual displacements Equation (6) is based on the
is expressed mathematically as conservation of energy principle,
Wext = Wint (6) i.e. the work done by the external
forces going through a virtual
F displacement equals the work
F1 done by the internal forces due to
Wext
the same virtual displacement.
W
The external virtual work can be
generalized to a system of forces
1
as
s
where Wext = F1 = external Wext q dx ( i ) Pi (7)
i 1
virtual work (shaded blue area in
the figure) and Wint = internal
13 14
virtual work.
dWint e x x A dx (8b)
4
Hooke’s law (x = Eex) leads to work is
L L L
Wint e x EA e x dx Wint z M z dx z EI z dx
0 0 0
L 2
L
d(u) du d (v) d2v
EA dx (9) EI dx (10)
dx dx 0 dx 2 dx 2
0
For the beam bending (flexure)
case (Fig. 3), the internal virtual where v = virtual transverse
displacement; z = d(v)/dx =
virtual rotation; Mz = real moment
about the z-axis; z = d2v/dx2 =
curvature strain about the z-axis;
and Mz = EI kz.
17 18
Fig. 3: Bending Deformation
5
u2 results in an external virtual work We will consider various
of expressions for the virtual
Wext = u2 Fx2 displacement to demonstrate the
In order to calculate the internal principle of virtual displacements.
virtual work First, consider
L
d( u) du u = (x/L) u2
Wint EA dx
0
dx dx The internal virtual work:
L
expressions for u and u over the u u EA
Wint 2 dx EA 2 u 2 u2
length of the axial deformation L 0 L L
structure must be assumed. We
Equating the external and internal
will consistently assume the real
virtual works gives
displacement u:
u2 Fx2 = u2 (EA/L) u2
u = (x/L) u2 or
21 22
6
A = A1(1-x/2L)
correspond to stresses that 1
Fx2
x, u
2
identically satisfy the conditions
L
of equilibrium, any form of
Fig. 5: Nonprismatic Axial Deformation
admissible virtual displacement Structure
will suffice to produce the exact Consider next the nonprismatic
solution. axial deformation structure of Fig.
5. We will repeat the process
Notice the adjective “admissible” in
considered for Fig. 4 with
front of virtual displacement.
reference to the geometry of Fig.
Admissible means that the
5. Considering the first case:
chosen function is physically
u = (x/L) u2
continuous and satisfies all
L
essential boundary conditions, i.e., u x )dx E u 2
Wint 2 A1 (1 2L
is appropriately zero at all L 0 L
supports. 25 26
7
Again, equating the external and The principle of virtual
internal virtual works leads to displacements has its greatest
1.222Fx2 L application in producing
u2
EA1 approximate solutions.
NOTE: None of the three solutions The standard procedure is to
match. This is because neither the adopt a virtual displacement of
real or virtual displacements are the same form as the real
exact. However, we produced displacement. Adopting different
three good approximate solutions. forms for the real and virtual
The exact solution for Fig. 5 is displacements can lead to
1.387Fx2 L unsymmetric stiffness matrices.
u2
EA1
29 30
Contragradience Principal
Special Transformations
in Analysis If one transformation is known, e.g.,
Congruent Transformation the local to global displacements,
the force transformation will be
A matrix triple product in which the
transpose of the displacement
pre-multiplying matrix is the
transformation provided both sets
transpose of the post-multiplying
of forces and displacements are
matrix, e.g.
conjugate and vice versa. Such a
[C] [A]T [B] [A] or [D] [A] [B] [A]T transformation is known as
Significance of the transformation is contragradient (or contragredient)
that [C] and [D] will each be sym- under the stipulated conditions of
metric if [B] is symmetric, which is conjugacy. Conjugate simply
one of the reasons all our stiffness means that the force-displacement
matrices were symmetric. pair only produce work in the
31 32
direction of the displacement.
8
For linear analysis, this is always
the case when using orthogonal
coordinate systems. A good
example are the coordinate
transformations for a truss member
(17.21) in which the transformation
matrices are rectangular:
cos sin 0 0
[Ta ]
0 0 cos sin
33