Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2
00:00:27,490 -> 00:00:30,543
In the advertising brochure
accompanying Tout va Bien
3
00:00:30,704 -> 00:00:34,185
festivals in Venice, Carthage,
New York and San Francisco
4
00:00:34,493 -> 00:00:36,954
we prefer to put
your picture in Vietnam
5
00:00:37,205 -> 00:00:39,399
in place of film stills.
6
00:00:40,289 -> 00:00:45,051
We found this photo in a number of
L'Express in early August 72
7
00:00:45,453 -> 00:00:48,809
and we think it will allow us to
speak very concretely
8
00:00:49,260 -> 00:00:50,677
the problems
presented by Tout va Bien.
9
00:00:51,338 -> 00:00:53,327
It is not absolutely
divert the conversation
10
00:00:53,660 -> 00:00:56,090
and not talking about Tout va Bien,
11
00:00:56,302 -> 00:00:58,822
as if we were afraid
speaking of this film.
12
00:00:58,939 -> 00:01:00,237
Absolutely.
13
00:01:00,514 -> 00:01:02,710
This is a way of not
marking time,
14
00:01:02,943 -> 00:01:05,334
(As troops
puppet Thieu Quang-Tri)
15
00:01:05,577 -> 00:01:08,572
which eventually leads to
go over the other.
16
00:01:09,241 -> 00:01:11,693
(As of 7th howitzers
fleet of Quang-Tri).
17
00:01:12,082 -> 00:01:15,181
It is, therefore, a spin
18
00:01:15,294 -> 00:01:17,031
but it is worth a expression,
19
00:01:17,423 -> 00:01:18,280
Direct a rodeo.
20
00:01:18,734 -> 00:01:19,694
That is,
21
00:01:20,076 -> 00:01:25,430
a revolution that will enable us to tackle,
directly, the terrible problems that small,
22
00:01:25,357 -> 00:01:29,231
one way or another, the film we shot
together earlier this year shows.
23
00:01:29,486 -> 00:01:31,329
And before speaking, then
and in every way,
24
00:01:31,380 -> 00:01:33,585
and the qualities
defects in our movie
25
00:01:33,862 -> 00:01:39,693
prefer to ask critical
reporters, to viewers,
26
00:01:40,030 -> 00:01:43,909
that may have to do with us and the effort
analyzing this your picture in Vietnam
27
00:01:44,233 -> 00:01:47,438
Taken a few months later
the film we made in Paris.
28
00:01:47,882 -> 00:01:52,616
Really, this picture, and the
short text that accompanies it,
29
00:01:52,448 -> 00:01:55,722
seem able to summarize Tout va
Bien we would know better than to do it.
30
00:01:56,008 -> 00:01:58,120
And this for a very simple reason.
31
00:01:58,192 -> 00:02:02,637
This photo answers the same
question that the film features:
32
00:02:03,052 -> 00:02:06,329
what role should play
intellectuals in the revolution?
33
00:02:06,809 -> 00:02:08,214
To this question,
34
00:02:08,653 -> 00:02:10,545
the picture gives a practical answer
35
00:02:11,248 -> 00:02:13,537
(The answer is practice).
36
00:02:14,514 -> 00:02:16,008
This photo shows you,
37
00:02:16,248 -> 00:02:17,007
really you, Jane,
38
00:02:17,315 -> 00:02:20,308
in the service of freedom
Vietnamese people.
39
00:02:21,004 -> 00:02:24,612
Tout va Bien also
answer this question,
40
00:02:24,614 -> 00:02:26,067
but not the same.
41
00:02:26,236 -> 00:02:30,210
Because less certain that the
Photo of responses to,
42
00:02:30,439 -> 00:02:32,790
the film exposes other questions first.
43
00:02:32,747 -> 00:02:35,077
And they arrive, after all,
44
00:02:35,607 -> 00:02:38,869
not present as such, the question
intellectuals and the revolution.
45
00:02:40,336 -> 00:02:42,431
As proposed, then this question?
46
00:02:43,166 -> 00:02:45,726
The film still does not answer accurately.
47
00:02:46,310 -> 00:02:49,093
But the way because even
answer is not, in fact,
48
00:02:49,735 -> 00:02:51,846
an indirect way of
propose new questions.
49
00:02:52,493 -> 00:02:56,201
Because there is no point to old
answers to new questions
50
00:02:56,672 -> 00:03:00,307
presented by the current development
of revolutionary struggles.
51
00:03:01,019 -> 00:03:03,634
You need to learn, even so,
to formulate these new issues.
52
00:03:04,390 -> 00:03:05,647
And learn from those who,
53
00:03:05,784 -> 00:03:09,442
although they have not had time to
write clearly these new issues,
54
00:03:10,564 -> 00:03:15,307
already conquered the land where
can flourish and expand,
55
00:03:16,724 -> 00:03:20,586
and won with a new practice.
56
00:03:21,228 -> 00:03:24,445
We we told you that the way in which,
57
00:03:24,953 -> 00:03:27,088
does not truly answer
as the Vietnamese and you in this photo,
58
00:03:27,452 -> 00:03:30,892
was an indirect way of
first present new issues.
59
00:03:31,373 -> 00:03:32,488
An indirect way.
60
00:03:32,846 -> 00:03:34,115
A awry.
61
00:03:34,284 -> 00:03:35,968
Now you can understand why
62
00:03:36,364 -> 00:03:39,207
the need for a rodeo
before speaking of the film.
63
00:03:39,756 -> 00:03:42,406
And why a spin by Vietnam?
64
00:03:42,567 -> 00:03:43,454
First,
65
00:03:43,904 -> 00:03:48,984
because everyone agrees that there
present new issues really.
66
00:03:49,794 -> 00:03:51,837
And then, because you were with them
67
00:03:52,063 -> 00:03:53,865
after you have been with us.
68
00:03:54,082 -> 00:03:58,727
Hence, when looking at this photo of a
actress in the theater of military operations,
69
00:03:59,594 -> 00:04:02,083
our desire to interrogate her.
70
00:04:02,334 -> 00:04:04,538
Not to question
actress, and yes, the photo.
71
00:04:05,034 -> 00:04:08,794
And for us, this equates to submit
a number of new issues
72
00:04:09,161 -> 00:04:12,211
the classical response
the Vietnamese and you
73
00:04:12,632 -> 00:04:17,055
gave this famous question of
intellectuals, taking and disseminating this photo.
74
00:04:17,547 -> 00:04:21,222
Also something intervenes
More in our decision
75
00:04:21,419 -> 00:04:25,538
to take this photo to
strolling by Vietnam.
76
00:04:26,305 -> 00:04:32,149
That something is our desire to make a
discussion of the film with the audience,
77
00:04:32,952 -> 00:04:34,211
whether or not journalists.
78
00:04:34,627 -> 00:04:37,123
Everyone is their own
journalist and his own publisher
79
00:04:37,898 -> 00:04:43,148
depending on how it develops
daily activity of each in a movie
80
00:04:43,977 -> 00:04:46,133
posing as star
this film.
81
00:04:47,068 -> 00:04:50,380
And it is precisely this type of
system of self-leadership.
82
00:04:51,161 -> 00:04:52,437
we want to talk.
83
00:04:53,619 -> 00:04:55,231
To talk with the viewer.
84
00:04:56,171 -> 00:04:58,968
But to do so, we must give it a whirl.
85
00:04:59,790 -> 00:05:02,167
Because, in the same way as a
film is a kind of turning
86
00:05:02,669 -> 00:05:04,043
which brings us back to ourselves
87
00:05:04,970 -> 00:05:06,545
anyway, back to the movie,
88
00:05:07,135 -> 00:05:10,002
must perform this
rodeo in ourselves.
89
00:05:11,046 -> 00:05:15,948
And here in America, "ourselves" I mean,
first still and always, Vietnam.
90
00:05:16,769 -> 00:05:18,662
Let us explain this with
a little more spaciousness.
91
00:05:19,250 -> 00:05:21,482
We think it's important
and urgent talk
92
00:05:21,789 -> 00:05:24,820
a little to those who gave
work to see our movie.
93
00:05:26,018 -> 00:05:27,891
This is where they are,
94
00:05:28,280 -> 00:05:30,175
and also where we are.
95
00:05:30,824 -> 00:05:34,276
Therefore, we must act in a
which may present issues,
96
00:05:34,465 -> 00:05:35,646
if they wish,
97
00:05:35,672 -> 00:05:38,376
or to respond to
questions exposed by us.
98
00:05:39,105 -> 00:05:41,427
Viewers have to be able to reflect.
99
00:05:42,191 -> 00:05:46,108
And reflect, first of all, this
problem of questions and answers.
100
00:05:46,769 -> 00:05:50,461
It is also necessary that we can be,
affected by questions from viewers
101
00:05:50,875 -> 00:05:51,817
(Or answers)
102
00:05:52,259 -> 00:05:54,186
and we can respond
(Or question)
103
00:05:54,709 -> 00:05:59,996
with something different answers (or questions)
also prefabricated (and answers?)
104
00:06:00,400 -> 00:06:04,012
But, prefabricated by
Who? For who? Against who?
105
00:06:04,399 -> 00:06:08,911
That is, the possibility to introduce a
real discussion of Tout va Bien,
106
00:06:09,413 -> 00:06:12,378
we situate outside Tout va Bien.
107
00:06:12,926 -> 00:06:16,416
To speak of this machine, we
leaving the factory that uses.
108
00:06:16,923 -> 00:06:21,484
Meet our base
discussion outside the cinema,
109
00:06:21,573 -> 00:06:24,907
away to come back.
110
00:06:25,629 -> 00:06:27,643
And when we return, we will leave
again with best step
111
00:06:28,191 -> 00:06:31,062
toward the real problems
true of our material life,
112
00:06:31,097 -> 00:06:34,382
which the film will not have
been only one element.
113
00:06:34,907 -> 00:06:37,521
We will not leave, nor
abandon Tout va Bien.
114
00:06:38,136 -> 00:06:41,734
Instead, we from him,
starting to go somewhere else,
115
00:06:42,547 -> 00:06:45,517
for example, Vietnam,
as you back away.
116
00:06:45,850 -> 00:06:50,535
But, and this is important,
we will with our own means.
117
00:06:51,202 -> 00:06:52,844
That means it comes?
118
00:06:53,313 -> 00:06:57,158
Our technical work
and the use social which makes them
119
00:06:57,107 -> 00:07:00,683
(You in this picture, in Vietnam,
us with the film in Paris)
120
00:07:01,241 -> 00:07:04,708
and from this use exactly
can better judge.
121
00:07:05,143 -> 00:07:07,339
And for once, we are not alone,
122
00:07:07,809 -> 00:07:09,427
the viewer will be there too,
123
00:07:10,267 -> 00:07:13,652
will produce the same
time they consume,
124
00:07:14,389 -> 00:07:17,910
and we will consume the same
the time that will produce.
125
00:07:18,697 -> 00:07:21,314
Perhaps all this will seem complicated.
126
00:07:21,484 -> 00:07:23,051
As Lenin said Vertov:
127
00:07:23,823 -> 00:07:28,616
is that the truth is simple, but
is not simple to tell the truth.
128
00:07:29,046 -> 00:07:33,213
And Uncle Vertov had discovered five
difficulties to tell the truth.
129
00:07:34,446 -> 00:07:36,515
Well Let's put it another way.
130
00:07:37,198 -> 00:07:40,404
At present, it is often said
that cinema must "serve the people".
131
00:07:41,100 -> 00:07:41,863
Very well.
132
00:07:42,383 -> 00:07:45,873
Instead of theorizing about
defects and quality Tout va Bien,
133
00:07:46,092 -> 00:07:47,593
let us go to Vietnam.
134
00:07:47,716 -> 00:07:50,803
But we by and with the
means of Tout va Bien.
135
00:07:51,232 -> 00:07:53,761
Let's look if one can say so,
136
00:07:54,779 -> 00:07:56,850
as Tout va Bien "works" in Vietnam.
137
00:07:57,011 -> 00:08:02,965
We may take, possibly, some
conclusions of this practical example,
138
00:08:03,186 -> 00:08:04,782
on things to do and avoid,
139
00:08:05,596 -> 00:08:07,235
each of us where there is,
140
00:08:08,063 -> 00:08:12,331
with his wife, his boss, his
children, your money, your desires, etc..
141
00:08:13,061 -> 00:08:19,119
Let's use this picture to go
Vietnam to investigate this issue:
142
00:08:19,792 -> 00:08:23,888
how cinema can help people
Vietnamese to win its independence
143
00:08:24,221 -> 00:08:26,720
And as we have said several times,
144
00:08:27,280 -> 00:08:31,279
we are not the only ones to use
this photo to go to Vietnam.
145
00:08:31,849 -> 00:08:33,906
Thousands of people did,
146
00:08:34,364 -> 00:08:38,438
probably almost here
everyone has seen this photo
147
00:08:38,706 -> 00:08:43,979
and during a few seconds, its
way it is served to go to Vietnam.
148
00:08:44,853 -> 00:08:47,960
Exactly, that's what we
think are important to know:
149
00:08:48,239 -> 00:08:51,392
how each used this
photo to go to Vietnam;
150
00:08:51,865 -> 00:08:54,688
truth: and as they went to Vietnam.
151
00:08:55,288 -> 00:08:58,451
Because Dr. Kissinger also
Vietnam goes to several times per year.
152
00:08:59,248 -> 00:09:04,347
It is just a guy like dr. Kissinger
we ask why this photo
153
00:09:04,871 -> 00:09:07,598
and that relationship can be
between this picture and Tout va Bien.
154
00:09:07,969 -> 00:09:12,643
And he and his friends say
this is not serious,
155
00:09:13,203 -> 00:09:18,122
we would do better talking
film, art, etc..
156
00:09:18,848 -> 00:09:22,020
But one should realize the effort
see these types of reflections
157
00:09:22,522 -> 00:09:24,737
contradict themselves when
Proposals thus
158
00:09:25,453 -> 00:09:30,678
complicate and obstruct all the way
other simpler questions
159
00:09:31,272 -> 00:09:33,961
(As can be said for
ordinary people).
160
00:09:34,998 -> 00:09:36,496
For example, before
say, "that relationship"
161
00:09:37,399 -> 00:09:39,762
we must first ask:
"There is even a relationship"?
162
00:09:40,938 -> 00:09:43,280
And then, it can be asked
what is the relationship.
163
00:09:43,163 -> 00:09:47,717
Having discovered the relationship,
we will find out a little further,
164
00:09:48,069 -> 00:09:50,598
that the relationship between our film
and this picture
165
00:09:51,061 -> 00:09:53,059
in this issue of the expression
166
00:09:53,469 -> 00:09:56,750
And eventually we can judge
its importance,
167
00:09:57,239 -> 00:09:59,381
ie establish other relationships
168
00:09:59,857 -> 00:10:02,733
with other important questions
and other important responses.
169
00:10:03,278 -> 00:10:06,041
Say that this is
folly, bla-bla-bla,
170
00:10:06,509 -> 00:10:10,161
but at the opposite end of this
new small chain of questions,
171
00:10:10,693 -> 00:10:12,208
the question of the importance,
172
00:10:12,915 -> 00:10:15,260
what others call the question
practical result,
173
00:10:15,688 -> 00:10:18,427
appears as a
very important issue.
174
00:10:19,658 -> 00:10:22,254
And that's because the North Vietnamese / Vietcong
175
00:10:22,852 -> 00:10:26,791
already answered the question about
the importance of this photo,
176
00:10:27,493 -> 00:10:32,665
able to do it in post
all parts of the "free" world
177
00:10:33,063 -> 00:10:35,709
(This same world
that holds free)
178
00:10:36,366 -> 00:10:39,009
demonstrating that the
importance he attached to this picture,
179
00:10:39,471 -> 00:10:42,670
the importance he attached to
question of the practical results,
180
00:10:43,404 -> 00:10:46,955
the importance he attached to
question of what is important.
181
00:10:47,946 -> 00:10:51,768
This photo is therefore a response
practice that the North Vietnamese,
182
00:10:52,381 -> 00:10:53,447
with your help, Jane
183
00:10:54,226 -> 00:10:56,830
decided to give the famous question
we did at the time:
184
00:10:57,234 -> 00:11:00,890
what role should play
revolutionary struggles in the film?
185
00:11:01,433 -> 00:11:06,152
In other words: what is the role
intellectuals in the revolution?
186
00:11:07,065 -> 00:11:09,672
To this question, to which the
photo gives a practical answer
187
00:11:10,323 -> 00:11:11,925
(The response of an entire people;
188
00:11:12,596 -> 00:11:14,624
takes up the photo and publishes
189
00:11:15,320 -> 00:11:19,603
and is thereby made to have the
security and certainty that it will be published,
190
00:11:20,130 -> 00:11:21,364
both here and there,
191
00:11:21,956 -> 00:11:26,774
what is a fact, because the
Otherwise, we would not have it).
192
00:11:27,164 -> 00:11:28,927
Tout va Bien answers
be a question too.
193
00:11:29,420 -> 00:11:31,373
But, from another location and
differently.
194
00:11:35,124 -> 00:11:37,774
One way is to say:
195
00:11:38,424 -> 00:11:41,243
where we are in France, in 1972,
196
00:11:41,779 -> 00:11:44,545
governed by friends
Americans and Russians,
197
00:11:45,190 -> 00:11:47,999
nothing is so clear,
nothing is so obvious
198
00:11:49,068 -> 00:11:50,774
(Remember, particularly, of
Fidel Castro, saying that the UN,
199
00:11:51,617 -> 00:11:54,760
for revolutionaries,
never evident truths,
200
00:11:55,394 -> 00:11:57,336
that imperialism was
whom had invented,
201
00:11:58,028 -> 00:12:03,811
and that major expertly served the
evident truths to oppress small).
202
00:12:04,649 -> 00:12:09,241
And since nothing is obvious, Jane,
continue asking questions,
203
00:12:09,961 -> 00:12:12,925
but we strive to
do them differently;
204
00:12:13,421 -> 00:12:17,927
in a nutshell: do questions
new power to give new answers.
205
00:12:18,619 -> 00:12:25,923
For example, let's look at how the Vietnamese
translate their combat and do questions
206
00:12:25,996 -> 00:12:28,233
since we also want
translate our struggle.
207
00:12:28,848 -> 00:12:31,443
And, firstly,
honestly ask ourselves
208
00:12:31,872 -> 00:12:35,715
what allows us to say
what really fight.
209
00:12:36,727 -> 00:12:39,095
But perhaps at this point,
you, Jane, we ask:
210
00:12:39,724 -> 00:12:42,991
why this picture of me and not
Clarke one of Ramsey, for example?
211
00:12:43,439 -> 00:12:47,685
He was also in Vietnam, also
witnessed the bombing of the dikes.
212
00:12:47,897 -> 00:12:50,136
Simply You, Jane,
because of Tout va Bien
213
00:12:50,580 -> 00:12:54,383
and because no solution in the film
was the same as in this picture.
214
00:12:55,066 -> 00:12:56,265
You're an actress.
215
00:12:56,265 -> 00:12:59,539
Naturally, we are all
actors in theater history,
216
00:13:00,237 -> 00:13:04,312
but in addition, you
film and makes us too.
217
00:13:05,222 -> 00:13:07,952
So say why you
not Yves Montand in Chile?
218
00:13:07,985 -> 00:13:09,600
He was also in the movie.
It is true.
219
00:13:10,367 -> 00:13:13,668
But it appears that the
Chilean revolutionaries
220
00:13:14,528 -> 00:13:18,267
not consider it appropriate
release photos of Yves,
221
00:13:19,247 -> 00:13:23,280
while the revolutionaries
Vietnamese mutual agreement with you,
222
00:13:23,780 -> 00:13:26,515
considered appropriate
disclose your photos
223
00:13:27,100 -> 00:13:31,471
(In fact, release photos of
its agreement with the Vietnamese cause).
224
00:13:32,677 -> 00:13:36,127
Also there is another
problem, inevitable.
225
00:13:36,614 -> 00:13:39,387
We are two men who ran
Tout va Bien and you're a girl.
226
00:13:40,016 -> 00:13:43,436
In Vietnam the question does not
presents this way, but rather here.
227
00:13:43,795 -> 00:13:47,273
And surely, as a woman, you
feel somewhat or very hurt
228
00:13:47,912 -> 00:13:51,268
because we criticize,
a little or a lot,
229
00:13:51,693 -> 00:13:53,800
their way to intervene in this photo.
230
00:13:54,266 -> 00:13:57,904
Hurt, because they are always, eternally,
arranged buzzwords to attack the girls.
231
00:13:59,021 -> 00:14:00,144
And for no other reason,
232
00:14:00,728 -> 00:14:04,749
hope you will answer
speakerphone our letter,
233
00:14:05,334 -> 00:14:08,984
As we read in two
or three sites in the United States.
234
00:14:08,929 -> 00:14:12,048
But it is also true that in
United States and Europe,
235
00:14:12,746 -> 00:14:15,094
things are still,
or has become in this way.
236
00:14:15,865 -> 00:14:18,614
And you and we are in
even resort
237
00:14:19,267 -> 00:14:22,106
that this picture can
serve as revealing.
238
00:14:23,183 -> 00:14:24,823
We left there.
239
00:14:24,929 -> 00:14:27,127
You in the USA. Of us in Paris.
240
00:14:27,591 -> 00:14:30,164
You in us
Paris. You in Vietnam.
241
00:14:30,650 -> 00:14:35,239
Us in Paris looking at you
Vietnam. Of us, we the USA.
242
00:14:35,350 -> 00:14:40,006
And everybody in this room
movies, listening to us and watching you.
243
00:14:40,718 -> 00:14:42,204
We left it all.
244
00:14:42,708 -> 00:14:47,458
All this is organized from a
somehow works in a certain way.
245
00:14:48,156 -> 00:14:50,755
We want to discuss it, from there.
246
00:14:51,507 -> 00:14:55,150
From Tout va Bien, go to
Vietnam, back to Tout va Bien,
247
00:14:55,655 -> 00:14:59,994
ie returning from Vietnam to this
room where juts Tout va Bien
248
00:15:00,425 -> 00:15:04,456
and immediately return to
home, and tomorrow back to the factory.
249
00:15:05,087 -> 00:15:06,895
To speak of all this,
250
00:15:07,191 -> 00:15:09,649
slip on this photo
the eyes of people.
251
00:15:10,241 -> 00:15:11,932
Or rather, we make it slide
252
00:15:11,967 -> 00:15:14,773
because the North Vietnamese
and you already had slipped.
253
00:15:15,317 -> 00:15:18,675
Put another way:
Ask, and ask ourselves:
254
00:15:19,116 -> 00:15:22,513
we looked at this photo?
What we had seen it?
255
00:15:22,990 -> 00:15:25,593
And for every question
discovers another.
256
00:15:26,034 -> 00:15:31,518
For example: we look at this photo? As
worked our gaze to look at this photo?
257
00:15:32,299 -> 00:15:35,932
And what makes it work
thus and not otherwise?
258
00:15:36,346 -> 00:15:37,658
And another question:
259
00:15:38,144 -> 00:15:42,368
what makes our voice interpreting
this look this way and not another?
260
00:15:43,043 -> 00:15:45,075
Tout va Bien presents
all these questions,
261
00:15:45,882 -> 00:15:49,457
that can be summed up in the great question
262
00:15:50,185 -> 00:15:53,791
the role of intellectuals
in revolutionary struggles.
263
00:15:54,151 -> 00:15:59,224
Or better said, we started
to see that this great and famous
264
00:15:59,259 -> 00:16:03,961
question of intellectual
locks itself when proposing.
265
00:16:04,305 -> 00:16:06,298
And the other blocks.
266
00:16:06,660 -> 00:16:08,291
And finally,
267
00:16:08,488 -> 00:16:11,624
is no longer a question
belongs to the field of revolution.
268
00:16:11,523 -> 00:16:13,820
The current question of the revolution
269
00:16:14,433 -> 00:16:19,645
(Discover the purpose of this
Photo therefore the purpose of the film)
270
00:16:20,210 -> 00:16:23,502
would, moreover:
how to change the old world?
271
00:16:24,181 -> 00:16:27,483
Immediately we see that
the old world of the Vietcong
272
00:16:27,977 -> 00:16:30,990
is not the same as the
an intellectual western
273
00:16:31,590 -> 00:16:36,630
the old world is not a Palestinian
the same as that of a black boy in the ghetto,
274
00:16:37,143 -> 00:16:42,406
the old world of a worker
Renault is not even his girlfriend.
275
00:16:43,639 -> 00:16:46,997
We see that this photo gives
therefore, a practical response
276
00:16:47,037 -> 00:16:49,381
this question of changing the old world.
277
00:16:50,169 -> 00:16:55,330
Let us therefore examine this
Photo / response, investigate.
278
00:16:56,150 -> 00:16:57,776
Some evidence extracted it.
279
00:16:58,252 -> 00:17:00,431
Let's analyze them
and synthesize them.
280
00:17:00,994 -> 00:17:06,704
Let us explain the organization
of the elements of this photo.
281
00:17:07,530 -> 00:17:13,649
Let us explain it with one hand as if
were a core physical and photographic
282
00:17:14,218 -> 00:17:19,329
and secondly, as it were
a cell-photographic society.
283
00:17:20,219 -> 00:17:25,657
Then try to relate research
scientific and research more directly political
284
00:17:26,267 -> 00:17:28,468
("Where do ideas come correct:
285
00:17:28,940 -> 00:17:34,258
the struggle for production, the class struggle
and scientific experimentation "Mao).
286
00:17:34,869 -> 00:17:37,960
Conduct this research,
interrogate this photo,
287
00:17:38,562 -> 00:17:43,798
what is it but to know how to treat
was given the answer that the photo gives
288
00:17:44,436 -> 00:17:46,860
(Under the conditions of the struggle in Vietnam).
289
00:17:47,518 -> 00:17:51,125
We will see if this response is
entirely satisfactory for everyone
290
00:17:51,381 -> 00:17:52,595
(For whom? Against who?)
291
00:17:53,261 -> 00:17:57,123
and perhaps does not begin
other questions arise,
292
00:17:57,158 -> 00:18:02,039
the same as that in order better
or worse, Tout va Bien proposes.
293
00:18:02,980 -> 00:18:07,345
For example, we see that in
Regarding an important part of the picture
294
00:18:07,784 -> 00:18:12,716
(Expression of actress
the relation mouth / eyes)
295
00:18:13,093 -> 00:18:17,390
in Western Europe, in our
understand, can not satisfy us
296
00:18:17,790 -> 00:18:23,667
the same way that their authors,
who took or decided to take this photo
297
00:18:24,092 -> 00:18:25,612
(The collective North Vietnamese / Viet Cong,
298
00:18:26,548 -> 00:18:30,594
which is absolutely normal at first
view, when the conditions are different;
299
00:18:31,146 -> 00:18:35,965
but you still need to consider
attentive and so obstinately as they,
300
00:18:36,540 -> 00:18:38,750
which determines that the "normal").
301
00:18:39,294 -> 00:18:41,077
Saying this does not equate
to act simply as
302
00:18:41,600 -> 00:18:44,859
most communist parties
the West and its support
303
00:18:45,328 -> 00:18:47,224
(Pope, the UN, the Red Cross)
304
00:18:47,692 -> 00:18:50,767
saying simply: we help
Vietnam to achieve peace.
305
00:18:51,458 -> 00:18:55,899
Unlike, say we have
said is something much more precise
306
00:18:56,440 -> 00:19:00,653
eg: we help the alliance
North Vietnam and South Vietnam
307
00:19:01,060 -> 00:19:02,980
achieve his peace.
308
00:19:03,375 -> 00:19:05,005
And more precisely:
309
00:19:05,203 -> 00:19:10,416
since to change their old world,
Vietnam helps us to change our,
310
00:19:10,866 -> 00:19:13,407
how can we in reciprocity
help you, really?
311
00:19:13,764 -> 00:19:16,412
And since the collective
North Vietnam / Vietcong
312
00:19:16,899 -> 00:19:20,267
fight, criticizes and transforms
Southeast Asia,
313
00:19:20,800 -> 00:19:24,942
how can we fight our place
to change Europe and America?
314
00:19:25,514 -> 00:19:29,591
Of course, it is something broader
to say: "Peace in Vietnam"
315
00:19:30,020 -> 00:19:35,471
and to conduct more thorough
to create two or three Vietnams,
316
00:19:35,968 -> 00:19:40,538
and hence that Marx (in the preface
the first edition of Capital)
317
00:19:40,948 -> 00:19:44,844
readers complain without fear
and "minutiae" to overthrow
318
00:19:45,464 -> 00:19:49,382
"The king of hell and
release the devils. "
319
00:19:50,429 -> 00:19:54,456
A few months before this
your photo, Jane, and Vietnamese,
320
00:19:55,042 -> 00:20:00,004
and today before ourselves, each can
do if you want, your own research.
321
00:20:00,310 -> 00:20:02,503
Soon, we will compare
freely the results.
322
00:20:03,052 -> 00:20:08,983
We may take the floor without
for it, get it from listening.
323
00:20:09,520 -> 00:20:11,539
In short, perhaps
for a brief moment,
324
00:20:12,101 -> 00:20:15,655
possible to say the least
stupidity on us and the revolution.
325
00:20:15,924 -> 00:20:17,295
Still more.
326
00:20:17,671 -> 00:20:19,877
So you do not
feel personally attacked
327
00:20:20,411 -> 00:20:22,008
but not really able to avoid it
328
00:20:22,494 -> 00:20:25,133
(Think the question is
misrepresented in this way, and,
329
00:20:25,649 -> 00:20:29,103
the end of this letter also
we have progressed in this regard,
330
00:20:29,538 -> 00:20:33,431
and for this we would need very
you would respond directly,
331
00:20:33,842 -> 00:20:36,989
since it not only write
as directors of Tout va Bien,
332
00:20:37,439 -> 00:20:40,249
but as readers of this photo.
333
00:20:41,006 -> 00:20:44,119
And should recognize that it is first
Since people who saw your picture
334
00:20:44,595 -> 00:20:47,898
he writes thus concerning
that he saw his picture in a newspaper).
335
00:20:48,534 -> 00:20:52,224
To not feel
direct target, we would say,
336
00:20:52,642 -> 00:20:57,534
who feels that the target is not Jane,
but rather a function of Jane Fonda,
337
00:20:57,990 -> 00:21:01,814
talk to interrogate this photo
you in the third person.
338
00:21:02,280 -> 00:21:04,641
Jane did not tell you this or that,
339
00:21:05,058 -> 00:21:10,528
we say the actress or militant, incidentally,
as does the text accompanying the photo.
340
00:21:10,851 -> 00:21:12,915
Here, then, which
are, in our opinion,
341
00:21:13,453 -> 00:21:16,709
the main elements
(And the elements of the elements)
342
00:21:17,414 -> 00:21:19,882
that play a role
important in this photograph
343
00:21:20,537 -> 00:21:25,237
published in the French newspaper L'Express
the beginning of August 1972.
344
00:21:25,807 -> 00:21:27,381
BASIC ELEMENTS
345
00:21:28,305 -> 00:21:31,906
This photo was taken at the request
government of North Vietnam,
346
00:21:32,434 -> 00:21:33,999
as a representative at the time
347
00:21:34,429 -> 00:21:39,415
the revolutionary alliance between the peoples
South Vietnam and North Vietnam.
348
00:21:40,209 -> 00:21:46,371
This photo was taken by Joseph Kraft,
set at the foot of the picture for a text
349
00:21:46,888 -> 00:21:50,254
that was not written by anyone
participated in action taking the picture,
350
00:21:50,816 -> 00:21:52,744
but for those who disclose;
351
00:21:53,200 -> 00:21:56,847
ie, by a text written by
one or more editors of L'Express,
352
00:21:57,408 -> 00:22:02,449
without consultation with the North Vietnamese delegation
in France (checked it).
353
00:22:03,107 -> 00:22:05,132
This text says that it is
354
00:22:05,167 -> 00:22:08,232
one of the most known and
moderate American journalists.
355
00:22:08,524 -> 00:22:09,873
The text says, also
356
00:22:10,245 -> 00:22:13,163
that the actress is a militant
passionate for peace in Vietnam.
357
00:22:14,153 -> 00:22:17,761
But the text does not speak of
Vietnamese who appear in the photograph.
358
00:22:18,333 -> 00:22:20,494
For example, the text says:
359
00:22:20,905 -> 00:22:23,528
Vietnamese is not seen in the background
360
00:22:23,902 -> 00:22:27,844
Vietnam is one of the least
known and less moderate.
361
00:22:28,451 -> 00:22:32,091
This photo, like all
photo, is physically changes.
362
00:22:32,638 -> 00:22:35,533
And the mouth speaks foot photo.
363
00:22:36,536 -> 00:22:39,895
This photo does not walk
stresses, makes telling
364
00:22:40,212 -> 00:22:43,539
(Because the speech and picture
says things in his own way)
365
00:22:43,977 -> 00:22:49,371
the militant ranks first
TVs and Vietnam last.
366
00:22:50,019 -> 00:22:54,108
Foot says: "Jane Fonda asks
some inhabitants of Hanoi ".
367
00:22:54,867 -> 00:22:57,607
But the newspaper does not publish
the questions asked,
368
00:22:57,946 -> 00:23:02,410
nor the answers given by representatives
Vietnamese people in this photo.
369
00:23:03,183 -> 00:23:06,480
It can be seen that
that foot, it does not describe
370
00:23:06,912 -> 00:23:10,834
Jane Fonda asks,
and yes, Jane Fonda hear.
371
00:23:11,816 -> 00:23:17,781
And you might not have heard
more than 1/250 sec,
372
00:23:18,479 -> 00:23:24,869
but this is 1/250 that
registered and published.
373
00:23:25,364 -> 00:23:29,019
Undoubtedly, in speaking thus,
foot simply means
374
00:23:29,586 -> 00:23:32,738
which is a snapshot taken
during the course of a discussion
375
00:23:33,212 -> 00:23:36,941
in which the actress / activist questioned,
actually, some inhabitants of Hanoi
376
00:23:37,583 -> 00:23:42,736
and therefore should not be given
importance to this detail mouth shut.
377
00:23:43,470 -> 00:23:45,384
But we shall see later,
378
00:23:45,719 -> 00:23:49,870
it is not a coincidence, or
rather, it is a random,
379
00:23:50,534 -> 00:23:54,665
this act is immediately exploited in
within the capitalist need,
380
00:23:55,393 -> 00:23:58,324
the need for capital
to unmask the real
381
00:23:58,820 -> 00:24:01,927
at the same time and that
unmasks, or
382
00:24:02,230 -> 00:24:05,556
the nessecidade to "trick" the consumer
on the merchandise.
383
00:24:07,092 -> 00:24:11,378
BASIC ELEMENTS LESS
384
00:24:12,046 -> 00:24:14,938
The position of the camera
is of the type called 'counter-bitten. "
385
00:24:15,418 -> 00:24:21,475
At present and in history
cinema is not a position innocent
386
00:24:22,070 -> 00:24:26,243
She had been very
defined technical and socially
387
00:24:26,855 -> 00:24:28,952
by Orson Welles in
his early films.
388
00:24:29,871 -> 00:24:33,389
The choice of framework
Nor is innocent or neutral:
389
00:24:33,990 -> 00:24:40,747
fits the actress looking
and not what the actress looks.
390
00:24:41,683 -> 00:24:44,975
Fits the actress therefore
as if the star.
391
00:24:45,807 -> 00:24:49,954
And this because, really, the actress is
one starlet internationally known.
392
00:24:50,574 -> 00:24:54,457
On the one hand, falls within the
militating starlet, and secondly,
393
00:24:55,291 -> 00:24:58,766
in the same movement fits
also militant as showgirl.
394
00:24:59,484 -> 00:25:01,173
What is not the same thing.
395
00:25:01,960 -> 00:25:05,019
Or better, which may be
the same thing in Vietnam
396
00:25:05,636 -> 00:25:07,973
but not in Europe
or the United States.
397
00:25:08,925 -> 00:25:13,611
On the next page does not appear
the militant looked in this photo,
398
00:25:14,256 -> 00:25:16,396
but what he saw in
other times.
399
00:25:17,035 -> 00:25:20,373
In our opinion, it is the
same chain of images
400
00:25:20,850 -> 00:25:27,041
of the same type as those transmitted by
television stations and newspapers in the "free" world.
401
00:25:27,886 -> 00:25:30,598
Images like those seen
hundreds of thousands of times
402
00:25:31,086 -> 00:25:32,840
(Often as pumps)
403
00:25:33,517 -> 00:25:35,139
and change nothing,
404
00:25:35,571 -> 00:25:39,025
except among those who struggle to organize
this chain of images in a certain way,
405
00:25:39,421 -> 00:25:40,444
your way.
406
00:25:41,217 -> 00:25:43,108
(7 points of g.r.t.)
407
00:25:43,602 -> 00:25:47,891
In fact, if this story
Dupont was signed or Smith,
408
00:25:48,478 -> 00:25:52,321
the newspapers themselves would reject,
for being too banal.
409
00:25:52,781 -> 00:25:54,694
Actually, we
admit
410
00:25:55,232 -> 00:25:57,739
it should be a trivial thing,
411
00:25:58,257 -> 00:26:01,557
for boys of a community
farm on the outskirts of Hanoi,
412
00:26:02,087 -> 00:26:04,420
rebuild their school,
say for the twentieth time,
413
00:26:05,020 -> 00:26:08,067
after being destroyed by
Phantom Doctor Kissinger.
414
00:26:08,513 -> 00:26:12,977
But, of course, no one will speak
this extraordinary banality,
415
00:26:13,374 -> 00:26:17,333
nor militant starlet,
nor L'Express.
416
00:26:18,042 -> 00:26:23,101
Nor will talk about what may have been
said the American actress and her sisters Vietnamese
417
00:26:23,522 -> 00:26:27,675
it can be seen that
so, on the next page.
418
00:26:28,263 -> 00:26:31,208
The American actress asked
as it plays in Vietnam
419
00:26:31,630 -> 00:26:34,863
or as someone who plays in Hollywood
can pose when in Hanoi
420
00:26:35,204 -> 00:26:37,156
where back to Hollywood.
421
00:26:37,651 -> 00:26:41,049
If L'Express does not speak for all,
this is, in our opinion,
422
00:26:41,719 -> 00:26:44,489
that neither the American actress
says anything about it.
423
00:26:44,894 -> 00:26:49,147
It is true that militant
spoke of pumps and dikes.
424
00:26:49,777 -> 00:26:53,299
But one should not forget that
militant is also an actress,
425
00:26:53,765 -> 00:26:59,136
that is, for example, neither
Russell Tribunal nor Ramsey Clarke.
426
00:26:59,980 -> 00:27:03,060
And, in our opinion, one should take
into account that, by being an actress,
427
00:27:03,552 -> 00:27:06,423
and White House officials
will have no difficulty,
428
00:27:06,800 -> 00:27:08,211
if anyone tries to stop them,
429
00:27:08,810 -> 00:27:13,709
to say that the actress was unconsciously
manipulated by enemy hands.
430
00:27:14,239 -> 00:27:18,978
and recites a text memory.
431
00:27:19,575 -> 00:27:21,992
Such criticism might
ruin easily
432
00:27:22,588 -> 00:27:25,671
all the efforts of actress and activist.
433
00:27:25,825 -> 00:27:32,931
And one should understand, why she continues
vulnerable to this kind of fact,
434
00:27:33,510 -> 00:27:37,227
We believe that in this case, due to which
the actress did not speak militant dykes
435
00:27:37,771 -> 00:27:44,630
starting from an example, such an actress
Vietnamese that the first notice,
436
00:27:43,557 -> 00:27:46,216
and then
437
00:27:46,937 -> 00:27:51,618
gives a play in a village
threatened by levees broke.
438
00:27:53,280 -> 00:27:58,961
In this regard we believe that
the militant leave the actress
439
00:28:00,214 -> 00:28:03,909
(And it's what they do at their level,
the Vietnamese who use it)
440
00:28:04,450 -> 00:28:06,786
could begin to represent
its role historically
441
00:28:07,232 -> 00:28:10,068
differently to Hollywood.
442
00:28:10,485 -> 00:28:13,495
Maybe the Vietnamese have not
directly require it yet.
443
00:28:14,105 -> 00:28:15,890
but probably, yes Americans,
444
00:28:16,478 -> 00:28:18,927
and therefore, indirectly,
the Vietnamese
445
00:28:20,112 -> 00:28:23,019
(Here we find the
need back.
446
00:28:23,454 -> 00:28:26,714
The Vietnamese are forced
to stroll by the U.S.).
447
00:28:27,287 -> 00:28:30,608
In this photo, this reflection of reality
448
00:28:31,078 -> 00:28:35,431
two people are photographed
front, the other back.
449
00:28:35,988 -> 00:28:39,663
Of two people, one is
clear, the other out of focus,
450
00:28:40,212 -> 00:28:46,426
in the photo, the famous American is sharp
and the Vietnamese anonymous smoky.
451
00:28:47,083 -> 00:28:51,780
Actually, the left
American is hazy,
452
00:28:52,351 -> 00:28:55,623
left Vietnamese
extraordinarily clear.
453
00:28:56,382 -> 00:29:01,457
But also in reality, the American right
remains remarkably sharp,
454
00:29:01,975 -> 00:29:07,048
while the right Vietnamese, the
"Vietnamization", is increasingly erased.
455
00:29:07,515 -> 00:29:10,542
What to think, now, the
"Measure" of Joseph Kraft,
456
00:29:11,138 -> 00:29:13,180
which evaluated all contradictions
457
00:29:13,608 -> 00:29:17,878
regulated and, therefore,
the diaphragm and the distance?
458
00:29:18,626 -> 00:29:23,445
Everything was measured, as was seen
the purpose of the framework,
459
00:29:23,808 -> 00:29:27,743
with a certain purpose
emphasize the star militating
460
00:29:28,194 -> 00:29:33,001
and thus obtain a certain product,
a certain idea / commodity
461
00:29:33,463 -> 00:29:36,544
and this, again for some purpose.
462
00:29:36,866 -> 00:29:40,005
Recall, the production of this product
463
00:29:40,684 -> 00:29:42,775
is directly controlled
by the government of North Vietnam.
464
00:29:43,272 -> 00:29:46,519
But its diffusion out
Vietnam is not.
465
00:29:46,978 -> 00:29:50,375
When yes, very indirectly
466
00:29:50,796 -> 00:29:52,271
(Not to mention the feedback).
467
00:29:52,913 -> 00:29:56,172
This diffusion is controlled
by chain TVs
468
00:29:56,894 -> 00:29:58,465
newspapers and the "free" world.
469
00:29:59,129 -> 00:30:03,377
There is therefore a part of the movement
we need a means of communication,
470
00:30:04,080 -> 00:30:06,514
can not be made by
who planned the movement.
471
00:30:06,981 -> 00:30:12,042
What moves? And that departure
that game, is it?
472
00:30:12,531 -> 00:30:14,818
And played by whom?
For who? Against who?
473
00:30:15,546 -> 00:30:19,280
Say simply, now
(Back to this later)
474
00:30:19,843 -> 00:30:23,962
that examined the
clear relationship / off
475
00:30:24,499 -> 00:30:30,097
expressed by the two faces,
realized something extraordinary:
476
00:30:30,558 -> 00:30:36,650
smoky face is the clearest
and the face is the most crisp smoky.
477
00:30:37,433 -> 00:30:39,371
The Vietnamese can
afford to be smoky,
478
00:30:40,329 -> 00:30:44,392
because there is much that
in fact, it is clear.
479
00:30:45,093 -> 00:30:47,817
The U.S. is bound to be sharp
480
00:30:48,415 -> 00:30:53,922
(And is the smoky Vietnamese forces who
this, in a very clear).
481
00:30:54,652 -> 00:30:59,233
The U.S. is bound to emphasize
clearly its real esfumação.
482
00:30:59,754 -> 00:31:02,504
But none of that was mentioned in the text.
483
00:31:03,087 -> 00:31:08,649
This photo repeats another picture of actress
484
00:31:09,103 -> 00:31:11,374
which appeared on the cover of
same number of L'Express.
485
00:31:12,112 -> 00:31:15,152
The composition of this cover
is very eloquent,
486
00:31:15,625 -> 00:31:20,767
if we work in a view
Photo may cover as much as discover.
487
00:31:21,195 -> 00:31:24,472
A photograph imposes silence
while speaking.
488
00:31:25,028 -> 00:31:26,160
In our view,
489
00:31:26,783 -> 00:31:31,118
is one of the technical bases
double aspect of Jekyll and Hyde,
490
00:31:31,396 -> 00:31:32,435
principles and interests,
491
00:31:32,470 -> 00:31:38,132
it takes the information / deformation when
is transmitted through images / sounds
492
00:31:39,085 -> 00:31:45,486
in our time, the decline of
imperialism and