13 | Urbanism and Architecture | Architecture in Spain | N. 117 | China |Interview Belinda Tato | pg. 33-41
0 Up votes0 Down votes
13 views10 pagesDescription:
Ecosistema urbano |Interview Belinda Tato | pg. 33-41
Date uploaded
Mar 04, 2019
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Did you find this document useful?
Description:
Ecosistema urbano |Interview Belinda Tato | pg. 33-41
Copyright:
© All Rights Reserved
13 | Urbanism and Architecture | Architecture in Spain | N. 117 | China |Interview Belinda Tato | pg. 33-41
Description:
Ecosistema urbano |Interview Belinda Tato | pg. 33-41
Copyright:
© All Rights Reserved
MAAS
NEW METHODS
RWWES | Belinda Tato
ESE. AA | Translated by Zhao Dan IRM. EH | Prooted by Qiu Zhiyong
mE (eR)
RARE, MEAROR. RII
RAMEE SOMMERS, TA—(PAHeRE SOTA ess
TENT RMB. UATE L rR FANIAREID,
RM SS ANSI URES SHS Fete ate
\MebIER, 2013.07 | UREANGM AND ARCHTECTURE Ws. 2013
SEHAOREM, MUS MOSCRETAE. AN, WOE AT RRA. MOAT
RAS ELL FO RNAI. AEROS, St —
ASEAN,
Abstract Inhetited methods are there and are stl useful there's no need to reinvent the wheel, However, what we are building right now is
citfuse way.
fen approaches, vihich will eventually be fixed into new methods and for the moment are being thought, tested and incorporated in a more
In our experience, these changes ae affecting the architectural ways of working in four main areas:
People relation through collaboration and involvement through participation,
Processes: the healthy conflict between flexibility and complesity vs. control an certainty,
Tools: openness and technology as a means for social change,
Leamings network learning and environments for active learning
In this article we will be addressing what we think are the most important tendencies and how we recognize them beth in our own work and
in other cases
Keywords Participation, Public space, Urban pedagogy, Digital environment, Openness, Social networks
The way we do things in architecture, the way we approach and develop projects
volves rather sly, Sometimes over centres, or even mote as we go back in
Fistor. Ths mokes sense as buldng itself has aways been a slow, lengthy process
in comparison to other design related actives. But cng the lst few decades
‘here has been acuucal and techrical acceleration that has brought faster changes
+o our methods, our tols and our resources, wich can now be branded as “new”
even over relatively shot periods
Although being perceived as - and actually being ~ innovations, these changes
«rag bebind a 1g tal’ 2 esitage of long-standing impulses that were just made
truly visible some decades ago, and are now being developed with new technical
posites within an emerging cuture of human-entered values
\Where does ths change come frm? Sac changes are connected to curl ones,
and a huge part of culture relies on technology. So it’s natural to think that recent
teciologeal changes lke the Intemet or the egtal development may have Given
impuse toa change in society, but aso the opposite: the growing shit Yo socal val
et may have diven the development of new means ane envionments where peo-
can flit their eed for connection and be empowered to interact withthe word
Regardless ofthe origins, the evidence shows that aspects from the ital culture
lke mind-speed access to information, ubiquitous connection, fl ime avabity
«exe of copy, remix and isvbuton are contributing to the optinzation of tad
tional processes and the incorperaton of soil principles like collaboration, rans
HDEMAII bee TISAI A
TAHSARRGOLER. SVRELGT. BEE
4, ROMGIESERMASZ Rit meD. AIRE At
FHS, BKORRER, CRBANITS, xi
ARORA. TRMRRRRT ERO
#2, DERERERMARSAE ERR
aE
Eeeink§ cine —oish REBAR
SRE, TAMEUT EMMA
EM, BFLUGPRMRPTC. maT ATH
sata, AMT,
ROCEENE LATE SKAREC SRS
SUORARE LUTHER, LSM. iD
BRUM TRARMAAMCDTHSD. RZ
IRS, 2S tM ONEG ASHEN SRA HRAOSIAIAO
RR. ATAILAR IRR ReORee SEREED,
RTO, BERR BFHERE (OER
ERNER, FEWER. STORE. STEM,
ERESRORS) NUSETMEBR TINUE
4, ARIE, 208, © SAcTHCrE SIENNA,
BOGE, E4SMERURS, St
2TRE THEME | SE
prency, participation or openness.
\We believe that in today’s connected world, an urban design should be the resutt
of an open and multlayered network of creative designers, technical expert, citi=
zens and stakeholders, combining design with data, needs, inputs. Within this new
context, itis necessary to explore the new role of the designer as a mediator, a
curator of socal processes in a networked reality trying to visualize and materialize
new urban models and design tools that enable the incorporation of the citizen as
an active agent, avoiding the conventional paracigm of the citizen as a consumer-
viewer-recipient of a finished product to become an active-citizen-producer of
ideas.This paradigm shift, as we can see, has direct consequences in contemporary
urban experiences. Itis time to participate; the questions are: how? with what tools?
what ate the channels? what role can architects have?
Inherited methods are there anc! are stil useful ~ furthermoce, they are still the
_main basis our work relies upon ~ so they don't need to be completely discarded or
reinvented. But there isa need to update and complete our professional "toolbox"
10 fulll some specific requirements coming from the present context. New ap-
proaches are being built, which change the way we address projects: ways of wark~
ing have to be found, that will eventually be fixed into new methods. But for the
moment they are being though, tested and incorporated in a more diffuse way.
In our experience, these changes are affecting the architectural ways of working in
four main areas: people, processes, tools and learning. In this article we will be ac-
essing what we think are the most important tendencies and how we recognize
‘ther both in our own work and in other cases
People: involvement through collaboration and participation
‘One of the most changing aspects of architecture - both as a service and as a
procluct~is the growing presence of the socal side: the involvement of people as
‘a way to secure both the relevance and the adequacy ofthe projects
Creativity in @ network. In @ globalized and information-saturated word, creativity
is the capacity of connecting things innovatively and thus we understand that the
protagonist of the creative process is not just a team but an open and multlay-
ted design network, growing around a specie project, and usualy going beyond
the limits of what used to be considered a "professional, a “client”, a “citizen” and
any other rele.
Hs inside that expanded network where architects and designers ae exploring the
power of collective inteligence, as well as new ways to put ideas into action, Leav-
ing a passive role that had them waiting fora commision, they are getting into @
mote proactive and context aware attitude, taking action, spotting and generating
‘opportunites as part oftheir daily work,
In that context, ciscipinary bonds are loosening, requiring open-minded profes-
sionals, flexible enough to adapt their roles and skls and to use unusual too: Ar-
chitects that know enough programming to interact with programmers and work
as software developers. Architects that know enough about event management
to collaborate with other cultural agents in the organization of a public debate, 2
workshop, ete Architects that know enough about sociology or anthropology to
{ive a certain value to the participation of sociologists and anthropoogjss in de
sign projects (Image 1)
Community fist. Cities have always been created and maintained by people for
people, and as we see it now, urban and architectural development only makes
sense completely when the community cares about it. Architects and urban design
«15 are working more consciously than ever to empower the communities to dive
Bit. HER. RALARMRRZOTM. Sam
ERROR HARE. RRMRASWILAA. &
REROREE, CittasERReme—ei
SERRHIANEES. EMBO
SRAM TR. LRA ARMMES
S MEGAMI. SMaRIEENE
SAURIBALING. TEMA EIN. POMS
AAMHRECHATHRER, NEES SMRIET
(SRRRINOSS) AYA TAD mitt amit seas
bee PPE PERSIA
UTE. MESIAL
(HOE, BUSA. OR.
RUASEERNAMR NGL “TRA USES
URI Fee IER, MRWATAE, HALES
(DERM, RNZIRRER TERRA RE
AIs. CREW. ESE SARS. te
seme.
IERIE, WEERIEEA. MA, TRE
2SOEEARRMRRMT TIA. SSK)
AUS. LURIRTE LEO MR
FRAREN,
A: atraes
HARI (RAMEE) RUKH
BSUS, ATS Se AOR
Fasesp tebe
SESE EROS EAB, Of
EPROURTIENBIIEMINEDIED. UHRA, ONE
SOEESSETRNA—TAN. RERRNEMES
NIN, SRORHMS, BRERMTRMADS
SW SP. Ra AIRE EAES
Ie AMIE. RUTROIRINTERER ES
Maori, URBSRMKERMEE. Mrmr
HeHES TREEMRMERMAE, ea
2. SWORN, SeMER AMEN TE
a0
SRHORT. SHORTEN, ROBES
RBHRAALUEMACA OMIM SIRO
CUFRNELAL SRRBHR OER
GRIESE RANBICD , PAOMETANIBSEE
SAFER T MELE SEIN IDE (FORA
W: THE RETA STEROLS
HAMea—EemeEAO (EL
{RAE —A-BATSemenemee ie
7. EAMES. ar MIORRSE
HOMRO. TRAREMSL. SLTRMRIAIHEH
CPLR REARS ERNE
PSE.
ER ARO ARES. SRiTMeA RHE
Sams, NING. HED. aid IR. ie
SORERDRNORIRETERAR
Documents Similar To 13 | Urbanism and Architecture | Architecture in Spain | N. 117 | China |Interview Belinda Tato | pg. 33-41
More From Ecosistema Urbano
Much more than documents.
Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.
Cancel anytime.