Output

Frequencies
Notes
20-FEB-
Output Created 2019
12:49:03
Comments
Input C:\Users\SU
RYA\Docum
Data
ents\surya.sa
v
Active
DataSet1
Dataset
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows
in Working 106
Data File
User-defined
missing
Definition
values are
of Missing
Missing treated as
Value missing.
Handling Statistics are
based on all
Cases Used
cases with
valid data.
FREQUENC
IES
VARIABLE
S=Gender
Age
Occupation
Syntax Experience
/PIECHART
PERCENT
/ORDER=A
NALYSIS.
Processor
00:00:02.48
Time
Resources
Elapsed
00:00:02.37
Time
[DataSet1] C:\Users\SURYA\Documents\surya.sav
Statistics
Gen Age Occu Experi
der Grou patio ence in
p n the
field
Vali
106 106 106 106
d
N
Mis
0 0 0 0
sing
Frequency Table
Gender
Freq Perc Valid Cumul
uenc ent Percen ative
y t Percent
Mal
80 75.5 75.5 75.5
e
Fe
Val
mal 26 24.5 24.5 100.0
id
e
Tota 100.
106 100.0
l 0
Age Group
y t Percent
Val <30
36 34.0 34.0 34.0
id years
30-40 57 53.8 53.8 87.7
years
>40
13 12.3 12.3 100.0
years
100.
Total 106 100.0
0
Occupation
y t Percent
Maso
35 33.0 33.0 33.0
n
Mazd
27 25.5 25.5 58.5
oor
Val Lay
25 23.6 23.6 82.1
id men
Barb
19 17.9 17.9 100.0
ender
100.
Total 106 100.0
0
Experience in the field
y t Percent
<2
5 4.7 4.7 4.7
years
2-6
75 70.8 70.8 75.5
years
Val 6-10
18 17.0 17.0 92.5
id years
>10
8 7.5 7.5 100.0
years
100.
Total 106 100.0
0
Pie Chart
Reliability
Notes
20-FEB-
Output Created 2019
12:53:50
Comments
C:\Users\S
URYA\Doc
Data
uments\sur
ya.sav
Active
DataSet1
Dataset
Filter <none>
Input
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows
in Working 106
Data File
Matrix
Input
User-
defined
Definition missing
of Missing values are
treated as
missing.
Missing
Statistics
Value
are based
Handling
on all cases
with valid
Cases Used
data for all
variables in
the
procedure.
RELIABIL
ITY
/VARIABL
ES=ASP1
ASP2
ASP3 R1
R2 R3 F1
F2 F3 CS1
CS2 CS3
TP1 TP2
TP3 WR1
WR2 WR3
WR4 ER1
ER2 ER3
Syntax I1 I2 I3 H1
H2 H3
EM1 EM2
EM3 EM4
OS1 OS2
OS3 PI1
PI2 PI3 PI4
Processor
00:00:00.00
Time
Resources
Elapsed
00:00:00.00
Time
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing
Summary
N %
Ca Vali 106 100.
ses d 0
Excl
uded 0 .0
a
Tota 100.
106
l 0
a. Listwise deletion
based on all
variables in the
procedure.
Reliability
Statistics
Cronb N of
ach's Item
Alpha s
.158 40
Regression
Notes
20-FEB-
Output Created 2019
12:56:02
Comments
C:\Users\SU
RYA\Docum
Data
ents\surya.sa
v
Active
DataSet1
Dataset
Input
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows
in Working 106
Data File
User-defined
missing
Definition
values are
of Missing
treated as
missing.
Missing
Statistics are
Value
based on
Handling
cases with
Cases Used no missing
values for
any variable
used.
Processor
00:00:00.00
Time
Elapsed
00:00:00.03
Time
Memory
6700 bytes
Resources Required
Additional
Memory
Required for 0 bytes
Residual
Plots
Variables
Entered/Removeda
Mo Variabl Variabl Met
del es es hod
Entere Remov
d ed
Organi
zations
upport,
Emplo
yeemot
ivation
,
repetiti
on,
Force,
Enviro
nmenta
lriskfa
ctors,
Health Ente
1 .
factors, r
Contac
tstress,
Individ
ualfact
ors,
Timep
a. Dependent Variable:
Productivityimprovemen
t
b. All requested variables
entered.
Model Summary
Mo R R Adjust Std.
del Squa ed R Error
re Square of the
Estima
te
.
1 a .204 .111 .44661
451
a. Predictors: (Constant),
Organizationsupport,
Employeemotivation,
repetition, Force,
Environmentalriskfactors,
Healthfactors, Contactstress,
Individualfactors, Timeperiod,
awkwardandstaticposture,
Workrelatedfactors
ANOVAa
Model Sum of df Mean F Sig.
Square Square
s
Regre 2.18
4.797 11 .436 .021b
ssion 6
1 Resid
18.749 94 .199
ual
Total 23.546 105
a. Dependent Variable:
Productivityimprovement
b. Predictors: (Constant),
Organizationsupport,
Employeemotivation, repetition, Force,
Environmentalriskfactors, Healthfactors,
Contactstress, Individualfactors,
Timeperiod, awkwardandstaticposture,
Workrelatedfactors
Coefficientsa
Model Unstandardiz Standa t Sig.
ed rdized
Coefficients Coeffi
cients
B Std. Beta
Error
1 (Constant) 2.746 .473 5.80 .000
0
awkwardan -
dstaticpostu -.083 .074 -.115 1.12 .264
re 3
-.92
repetition -.064 .069 -.092 .357
6
2.64
Force .222 .084 .296 .010
6
Contactstres 1.25
.085 .068 .126 .212
s 7
-
Timeperiod -.093 .082 -.115 1.14 .257
1
-
Workrelated
-.129 .092 -.150 1.41 .161
factors
2
Environmen -
talriskfactor -.169 .072 -.225 2.34 .021
s 3
Individualfa -.034 .075 -.045 -.45 .653
ctors 1
Healthfactor
.057 .075 .074 .758 .450
s
Employeem 1.50
.147 .098 .145 .136
otivation 4
-
Organizatio
-.125 .071 -.165 1.76 .081
nsupport
5
a. Dependent Variable: Productivityimprovement
Factor Analysis
Notes
21-FEB-2019
Output Created
09:38:06
Comments
C:\Users\SURY
Data A\Documents\s
urya.sav
Active Dataset DataSet1
Filter <none>
Input
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in
Working Data 106
File
Missing Value Definition of MISSING=EXC
Handling Missing LUDE: User-
defined
missing values
are treated as
missing.
LISTWISE:
Statistics are
based on
Cases Used cases with no
missing values
for any variable
used.
FACTOR
/VARIABLES
ASP1 ASP2
ASP3 R1 R2
R3 F1 F2 F3
CS1 CS2 CS3
TP1 TP2 TP3
WR1 WR2
WR3 WR4
ER1 ER2 ER3
I1 I2 I3 H1 H2
H3 EM1 EM2
EM3 EM4 OS1
OS2 OS3 PI1
PI2 PI3 PI4 PI5
/MISSING
LISTWISE
/ANALYSIS
ASP1 ASP2
ASP3 R1 R2
R3 F1 F2 F3
CS1 CS2 CS3
TP1 TP2 TP3
WR1 WR2
WR3 WR4
ER1 ER2 ER3
Syntax
I1 I2 I3 H1 H2
H3 EM1 EM2
EM3 EM4 OS1
Processor
00:00:00.03
Time
Elapsed Time 00:00:00.06
Resources
Maximum 196056
Memory (191.461K)
Required bytes
Descriptive Statistics
Mean Std. Analys
Deviatio is N
n
Will working in
awkward
posture
increases the
1.79 1.110 106
total exertion
required to
complete a
job?
Will
comfortness
with tools
during
2.68 1.000 106
execution of
work
increases
productivity?
Holding items
overhead
2.32 1.404 106
creates body
pain
Repetitive
movements
result in body
injuries and
physical stress 1.77 1.165 106
develops
during
repetitive of
the work
Will
performing the
task without
2.71 1.078 106
any break
decreases the
productivity?
Lifting heavy
equipment and
material 2.16 1.188 106
causes
discomfort
Do you agree
weight of load
handled or
lifted 1.96 1.170 106
increases the
work related
injuries?
Does handling
more loads for
significant
2.40 1.247 106
distances
creates any
stress?
Does speedy
construction of
work force on
2.23 1.213 106
labour create
forceful
exertions?
The mental
stress created
2.16 1.288 106
while working
on machine
Resting wrists
or arms on the
edge of a work
2.73 1.291 106
surface that
creates
contact stress
The stress can
be occured
when the tools
2.24 1.262 106
are handled
for prolonged
periods
Will working
over longer
duration
without any 2.11 1.275 106
break reduces
labour
productivity?
Does working
at holidays
cause any 1.82 1.049 106
discomfort to
workers?
Does working
at night shifts
2.47 1.156 106
reduce
productivity?
Is risk from
insufficient
communicatio 2.17 1.223 106
n of site
information?
While handling
heavy
equipment and
2.47 1.251 106
materials that
can cause
health efects
Manual
handling of
2.33 1.248 106
irregular sized
loads
Does pushing
and pulling of
the loads
2.52 1.282 106
makes the
workers
discomfort?
Will variation
in climatic
condition
reduces the 2.07 1.149 106
productivity
and project
delays?
Do you think
new
environment
2.43 1.219 106
causes the
labours to
workless?
Does climatic
conditions
affect the
overall 2.10 1.330 106
performance
of the
workers?
Lack of
communicatio
n among
project
2.12 1.152 106
members
creates
emotional
chaos?
Does lack of
knowledge in
workskills
2.57 1.203 106
creates stress
among
labours?
Training to
workers
regarding 2.10 1.249 106
ergonomics is
must?
While working
with machine
injuries occur 2.35 1.113 106
for the labour
on site
Working with
lot of bending
or twisting the
body that 2.07 1.173 106
results with
the health
problems
Will lifting of
heavy loads
2.25 1.219 106
on site creates
body stress?
Do you agree
that financial
incentives
motivates 2.04 1.170 106
more than
nonfinancial
incentives?
Do you agree
that
management
is really 2.45 1.114 106
interested in
motivating the
employees?
Support from
the co-worker
2.17 1.207 106
is helpful to
get motivated
Whether a
strong trade
union makes
the workers 2.45 1.235 106
participation
more
effective?
Does good
physical
working
2.39 1.321 106
conditions are
provided in the
organization?
Does the
employees in
the
2.52 1.442 106
organization
feel secured in
their job?
Do you adopt
good safety
measures in 1.99 1.134 106
the
organization?
Using of
advanced
equipment in
2.44 1.172 106
site increases
the
productivity
Do you believe
that workers
participation
equally
contribute
towards the
better
2.08 1.217 106
relationship
between
worker and
management
and it
increases
productivity?
Will
conducting
trainings and
programs for 2.40 1.209 106
the labours on
site increases
productivity?
Does shortage
of construction
materials
2.44 1.346 106
affects the
productivity on
site?
Extents of
variations or
change order
during
2.25 1.265 106
execution of
work affects
the
productivity
KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure
.468
of Sampling Adequacy.
Approx. Chi- 1189.
Bartlett's Test Square 282
of Sphericity df 780
Sig. .000
Communalities
Initial Extrac
tion
Will working in
awkward
posture
increases the
1.000 .666
total exertion
required to
complete a
job?
Will
comfortness
with tools
during
1.000 .766
execution of
work
increases
productivity?
Holding items
overhead
1.000 .706
creates body
pain
Repetitive
movements
result in body
injuries and
physical stress 1.000 .734
develops
during
repetitive of
the work
Will
performing the
task without
1.000 .645
any break
decreases the
productivity?
Lifting heavy
equipment and
material 1.000 .647
causes
discomfort
Do you agree
weight of load
handled or
lifted 1.000 .759
increases the
work related
injuries?
Does handling
more loads for
significant
1.000 .756
distances
creates any
stress?
Does speedy
construction of
work force on
1.000 .773
labour create
forceful
exertions?
The mental
stress created
1.000 .715
while working
on machine
Resting wrists
or arms on the
edge of a work
1.000 .803
surface that
creates
contact stress
The stress can
be occured
when the tools
1.000 .655
are handled
for prolonged
periods
Will working
over longer
duration
without any 1.000 .688
break reduces
labour
productivity?
Does working
at holidays
cause any 1.000 .743
discomfort to
workers?
Does working
at night shifts
1.000 .759
reduce
productivity?
Is risk from
insufficient
communicatio 1.000 .755
n of site
information?
While handling
heavy
equipment and
1.000 .696
materials that
can cause
health efects
Manual
handling of
1.000 .710
irregular sized
loads
Does pushing
and pulling of
the loads
1.000 .590
makes the
workers
discomfort?
Will variation
in climatic
condition
reduces the 1.000 .681
productivity
and project
delays?
Do you think
new
environment
1.000 .632
causes the
labours to
workless?
Does climatic
conditions
affect the
overall 1.000 .701
performance
of the
workers?
Lack of
communicatio
n among
project
1.000 .687
members
creates
emotional
chaos?
Does lack of
knowledge in
workskills
1.000 .725
creates stress
among
labours?
Training to
workers
regarding 1.000 .557
ergonomics is
must?
While working
with machine
injuries occur 1.000 .707
for the labour
on site
Working with
lot of bending
or twisting the
body that 1.000 .663
results with
the health
problems
Will lifting of
heavy loads
1.000 .628
on site creates
body stress?
Do you agree
that financial
incentives
motivates 1.000 .693
more than
nonfinancial
incentives?
Do you agree
that
management
is really 1.000 .728
interested in
motivating the
employees?
Support from
the co-worker
1.000 .732
is helpful to
get motivated
Whether a
strong trade
union makes
the workers 1.000 .587
participation
more
effective?
Does good
physical
working
1.000 .706
conditions are
provided in the
organization?
Does the
employees in
the
1.000 .584
organization
feel secured in
their job?
Do you adopt
good safety
measures in 1.000 .471
the
organization?
Using of
advanced
equipment in
1.000 .678
site increases
the
productivity
Do you believe
that workers
participation
equally
contribute
towards the
better
1.000 .508
relationship
between
worker and
management
and it
increases
productivity?
Will
conducting
trainings and
programs for 1.000 .637
the labours on
site increases
productivity?
Does shortage
of construction
materials
1.000 .692
affects the
productivity on
site?
Extents of
variations or
change order
during
1.000 .661
execution of
work affects
the
productivity
Extraction Method: Principal
Component Analysis.
Total Variance Explained

Compo Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of
nent Squared Loadings
Total % of Cumulat Total % of Cumulat
Varianc ive % Varianc ive %
e e
1 4.452 11.131 11.131 4.452 11.131 11.131
2 2.707 6.768 17.899 2.707 6.768 17.899
3 2.357 5.892 23.791 2.357 5.892 23.791
4 2.034 5.086 28.877 2.034 5.086 28.877
5 1.971 4.928 33.804 1.971 4.928 33.804
6 1.809 4.523 38.327 1.809 4.523 38.327
7 1.697 4.241 42.569 1.697 4.241 42.569
8 1.582 3.955 46.524 1.582 3.955 46.524
9 1.512 3.780 50.303 1.512 3.780 50.303
10 1.380 3.449 53.753 1.380 3.449 53.753
11 1.280 3.200 56.953 1.280 3.200 56.953
12 1.252 3.130 60.083 1.252 3.130 60.083
13 1.150 2.874 62.957 1.150 2.874 62.957
14 1.043 2.608 65.565 1.043 2.608 65.565
15 1.002 2.504 68.069 1.002 2.504 68.069
16 .976 2.439 70.508
17 .959 2.398 72.906
18 .872 2.180 75.085
19 .817 2.043 77.128
20 .804 2.010 79.138
21 .754 1.884 81.022
22 .728 1.819 82.841
23 .672 1.680 84.521
24 .641 1.601 86.123
25 .604 1.511 87.633
26 .581 1.453 89.086
27 .536 1.340 90.426
28 .527 1.318 91.744
29 .461 1.153 92.897
30 .416 1.040 93.936
31 .360 .900 94.837
32 .348 .871 95.707
33 .318 .794 96.501
34 .272 .681 97.182
35 .249 .621 97.803
36 .238 .594 98.397
37 .208 .520 98.917
38 .177 .442 99.359
39 .136 .341 99.700
40 .120 .300 100.000
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Component Matrixa
Component
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Will working in
awkward
posture
increases the
.214 .391 .194 .135 .022 -.284 -.071 .042 .390 -.185 .225 -.014 .116 .269 -.023
total exertion
required to
complete a
job?
Will
comfortness
with tools
during .064 -.166 -.146 .560 .259 .093 .220 -.032 .094 .014 .362 .065 -.231 -.249 -.120
execution of
work increases
productivity?
Holding items
overhead
-.168 .288 .038 -.253 .012 .226 -.278 .280 .403 .017 -.230 .032 -.315 -.062 .054
creates body
pain
Repetitive
movements
result in body
injuries and
physical stress .287 -.018 -.001 .125 .325 -.478 -.173 -.177 -.180 .122 -.042 .263 .000 .225 -.269
develops
during
repetitive of
the work
Will performing
the task
without any
-.078 -.033 -.019 .291 -.025 .061 .498 .340 .097 -.121 .258 .217 -.105 -.188 .010
break
decreases the
productivity?
Lifting heavy
equipment and
material .225 .082 -.083 .155 .139 -.421 -.116 .048 .294 .452 -.003 -.112 -.029 .137 -.155
causes
discomfort
Do you agree
weight of load
handled or
lifted increases .195 .331 .461 .303 .149 .150 .127 -.088 .145 -.154 -.358 -.020 .065 -.084 -.232
the work
related
injuries?
Does handling
more loads for
significant
-.093 -.012 -.478 -.406 .162 .062 -.022 .151 .319 -.218 .044 .340 .167 .027 .075
distances
creates any
stress?
Does speedy
construction of
work force on
.052 .281 .534 .300 .014 .365 -.091 -.355 -.159 -.062 -.031 -.032 .005 -.060 .120
labour create
forceful
exertions?
The mental
stress created
.257 .149 -.153 -.075 .664 .337 .068 .096 .026 -.089 -.041 .004 -.007 .134 .035
while working
on machine
Resting wrists
or arms on the
edge of a work
-.122 .001 .350 .032 -.399 -.184 .085 -.046 .511 .121 -.057 .306 .271 .068 .112
surface that
creates
contact stress
The stress can
be occured
when the tools
.184 .310 -.307 -.030 .439 .198 -.192 -.076 .056 .232 .106 -.176 -.155 .161 .082
are handled
for prolonged
periods
Will working
over longer
duration
without any .238 .369 .221 -.272 .141 -.041 -.141 .031 -.246 .059 -.001 -.068 .386 -.334 -.013
break reduces
labour
productivity?
Does working
at holidays
cause any .434 .365 .206 .151 .201 -.078 .225 -.087 -.135 -.041 .182 .374 -.025 .061 .235
discomfort to
workers?
Does working
at night shifts
-.387 -.246 -.261 .244 .022 .266 .069 -.154 .134 .066 .067 -.346 .361 .039 -.207
reduce
productivity?
Is risk from
insufficient
communicatio .564 .381 -.064 .108 .042 .080 -.068 .359 -.084 -.256 -.105 -.075 .128 -.050 -.163
n of site
information?
While handling
heavy
equipment and
-.325 -.159 .247 -.101 .223 .141 .245 -.190 .138 .196 -.220 .389 -.029 -.103 -.244
materials that
can cause
health efects
Manual
handling of
.439 .316 -.201 .091 -.099 -.078 -.102 -.193 .329 .190 -.121 -.107 .031 -.314 .187
irregular sized
loads
Does pushing
and pulling of
the loads
-.403 -.088 -.003 .154 .451 .106 .176 .122 .189 -.077 -.038 -.064 .271 .114 .031
makes the
workers
discomfort?
Will variation
in climatic
condition
reduces the .497 .435 .051 -.074 -.306 .147 .143 .105 -.065 -.060 .108 .001 -.066 .141 -.218
productivity
and project
delays?
Do you think
new
environment
-.349 -.436 .215 .118 .172 -.234 -.216 .036 -.301 -.015 -.095 .114 -.099 -.066 .034
causes the
labours to
workless?
Does climatic
conditions
affect the
overall .208 .114 .025 -.110 -.149 -.092 .605 -.021 -.132 .044 .043 -.177 -.092 .396 .131
performance
of the
workers?
Lack of
communicatio
n among
project
.229 -.021 -.033 .232 -.089 .299 -.325 .366 -.020 .305 .206 .220 .196 -.043 -.131
members
creates
emotional
chaos?
Does lack of
knowledge in
workskills
-.275 -.020 .081 .087 .296 -.472 -.043 .358 .082 -.346 -.022 -.190 -.132 -.084 .084
creates stress
among
labours?
Training to
workers
regarding .336 -.226 -.187 .352 -.079 .125 -.006 .099 -.046 .149 -.220 .244 .011 .264 -.037
ergonomics is
must?
While working
with machine
injuries occur -.267 .305 .123 .148 .198 -.312 .184 .134 -.057 .333 .035 -.153 .144 -.161 .363
for the labour
on site
Working with
lot of bending
or twisting the
body that .327 -.167 -.114 .321 -.209 .071 -.472 .102 -.109 -.034 .257 .074 -.031 .058 .203
results with the
health
problems
Will lifting of
heavy loads
-.442 .118 .211 -.193 .054 -.061 .018 .307 -.046 .255 .241 -.007 .201 .028 -.263
on site creates
body stress?
Do you agree
that financial
incentives
motivates .440 -.159 -.394 .098 .054 -.039 .231 -.156 .168 .242 -.250 -.130 -.171 -.176 -.026
more than
nonfinancial
incentives?
Do you agree
that
management
is really -.504 .093 .326 .083 .295 .206 -.231 -.001 .067 .141 .011 .137 -.187 .164 .253
interested in
motivating the
employees?
Support from
the co-worker
.438 -.302 -.227 -.046 .115 .089 .199 .158 -.144 .055 -.125 .175 .368 -.117 .302
is helpful to
get motivated
Whether a
strong trade
union makes
the workers -.509 .346 -.137 .154 -.133 .113 .050 -.075 .051 -.083 .257 -.025 -.112 -.151 -.129
participation
more
effective?
Does good
physical
working
.530 -.263 .024 -.024 .091 -.221 -.135 -.211 .223 -.357 .007 .138 -.051 -.189 -.040
conditions are
provided in the
organization?
Does the
employees in
the
-.353 .430 -.278 -.131 -.079 -.039 -.036 .048 -.140 .111 -.019 .271 -.170 -.148 -.111
organization
feel secured in
their job?
Do you adopt
good safety
measures in .319 -.324 .319 -.003 .225 .070 -.079 .178 .021 -.126 -.093 -.152 .046 .039 -.132
the
organization?
Using of
advanced
equipment in
-.397 .372 -.411 -.034 .008 .080 .010 -.211 -.156 -.176 -.204 .161 .094 .168 .030
site increases
the
productivity
Do you believe
that workers
participation
equally
contribute
towards the
better
.327 -.185 .355 -.200 .014 .307 .054 .042 .090 .265 .061 -.034 -.100 .003 .087
relationship
between
worker and
management
and it
increases
productivity?
Will
conducting
trainings and
programs for -.318 .302 -.275 .389 .056 -.113 -.152 -.336 -.048 -.077 -.004 .078 .226 -.003 .008
the labours on
site increases
productivity?
Does shortage
of construction
materials
.099 -.266 .106 -.281 .100 .144 -.107 -.427 .250 -.136 .443 -.042 .109 .059 .049
affects the
productivity on
site?
Extents of
variations or
change order
during
-.298 -.076 -.022 .489 -.282 .141 -.095 .213 .137 -.130 -.287 -.076 .033 .153 .157
execution of
work affects
the
productivity
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
a. 15 components extracted.
Rotated
Compon
ent
Matrixa
a.
Rotation
failed to
converge
in 50
iterations
.
(Converg
ence = .
000).
Correlations
Notes
Output Created 28-FEB-2019 12:10:24

Comments
C:\Users\SURYA\Documents\sury
Data
a.sav
Input Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 106
User-defined missing values are
Definition of Missing
treated as missing.
Missing Value Handling Statistics for each pair of variables
Cases Used are based on all the cases with
valid data for that pair.
CORRELATIONS
/VARIABLES=awkwardandstaticpo
sture repetition Force
Contactstress Timeperiod
Workrelatedfactors
Syntax Environmentalriskfactors
Individualfactors Healthfactors
Employeemotivation
Organizationsupport
/PRINT=TWOTAIL NOSIG
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.
Processor Time 00:00:00.02
Resources
Correlations
awkwardandstaticp repetition Force Contactstress Timeperiod Workrelatedfactors Environmentalriskfa Individualfactors Healthfactors Employeemoti
osture ctors n
**
Pearson Correlation 1 .105 .275 .190 -.011 .170 -.082 .189 .042
awkwardandstaticposture Sig. (2-tailed) .282 .004 .051 .908 .082 .405 .052 .672
N 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106

**
Pearson Correlation .105 1 -.106 .111 .017 .135 .044 .272 .093
repetition Sig. (2-tailed) .282 .281 .259 .861 .167 .652 .005 .345
N 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106
** * ** **
Pearson Correlation .275 -.106 1 .215 .277 .390 -.009 -.070 -.179
Force Sig. (2-tailed) .004 .281 .027 .004 .000 .926 .479 .066
N 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106
* **
Pearson Correlation .190 .111 .215 1 .150 .313 -.077 -.022 -.012
Contactstress Sig. (2-tailed) .051 .259 .027 .124 .001 .436 .820 .906
N 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106
**
Pearson Correlation -.011 .017 .277 .150 1 .161 .098 -.003 .113
Timeperiod Sig. (2-tailed) .908 .861 .004 .124 .099 .316 .975 .247
N 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106
** **
Pearson Correlation .170 .135 .390 .313 .161 1 -.150 .061 -.058
Workrelatedfactors Sig. (2-tailed) .082 .167 .000 .001 .099 .126 .532 .552
N 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106
Pearson Correlation -.082 .044 -.009 -.077 .098 -.150 1 -.042 -.043
Environmentalriskfactors Sig. (2-tailed) .405 .652 .926 .436 .316 .126 .670 .658
N 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106
**
Pearson Correlation .189 .272 -.070 -.022 -.003 .061 -.042 1 .169
Individualfactors Sig. (2-tailed) .052 .005 .479 .820 .975 .532 .670 .083
N 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106
Pearson Correlation .042 .093 -.179 -.012 .113 -.058 -.043 .169 1
Healthfactors Sig. (2-tailed) .672 .345 .066 .906 .247 .552 .658 .083
N 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106
Pearson Correlation .189 -.042 .035 .101 .103 .047 -.173 .088 .044
Employeemotivation Sig. (2-tailed) .052 .671 .722 .303 .295 .635 .076 .372 .653
N 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106
Pearson Correlation .046 -.007 .049 .073 -.083 .044 -.049 .029 -.136
Organizationsupport Sig. (2-tailed) .642 .941 .617 .457 .400 .651 .618 .771 .164
N 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106
* *
Productivityimprovement Pearson Correlation -.010 -.164 .199 .113 -.023 -.020 -.239 -.094 .033
Sig. (2-tailed) .915 .094 .040 .250 .811 .840 .014 .339 .737
N 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Crosstabs
Notes

Comments
Data
a.sav
Input Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
treated as missing.
Statistics for each table are based
Missing Value Handling
on all the cases with valid data in
Cases Used
the specified range(s) for all
variables in each table.
CROSSTABS
/TABLES=Gender Age
Occupation Experience BY
awkwardandstaticposture
repetition Force Contactstress
Timeperiod Workrelatedfactors
Environmentalriskfactors
Syntax Employeemotivation
Organizationsupport
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ
/CELLS=COUNT EXPECTED
ROW COLUMN TOTAL
/COUNT ROUND CELL
/BARCHART.
Processor Time 00:00:10.77

Resources
Dimensions Requested 2
Cells Available 174762
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Gender *
106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Gender * repetition 106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Gender * Force 106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Gender * Contactstress 106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Gender * Timeperiod 106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Gender * Workrelatedfactors 106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Gender *
106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Gender * Individualfactors 106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Gender * Healthfactors 106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Gender * Employeemotivation 106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Gender * Organizationsupport 106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Gender *
106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Age Group *
106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Age Group * repetition 106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Age Group * Force 106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Age Group * Contactstress 106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Age Group * Timeperiod 106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Age Group * Workrelatedfactors 106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Age Group *
106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Age Group * Individualfactors 106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Age Group * Healthfactors 106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Age Group *
106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Employeemotivation
Age Group *
106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Organizationsupport
Age Group *
106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Occupation *
106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Occupation * repetition 106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Occupation * Force 106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Occupation * Contactstress 106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Occupation * Timeperiod 106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Occupation * Workrelatedfactors 106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Occupation *
106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Occupation * Individualfactors 106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Occupation * Healthfactors 106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Occupation *
106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Employeemotivation
Occupation *
106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Organizationsupport
Occupation *
106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Experience in the field *
106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
repetition
Experience in the field * Force 106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Contactstress
106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Timeperiod
106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Workrelatedfactors
106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Individualfactors
106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Healthfactors
106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Employeemotivation
106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Organizationsupport
106 100.0% 0 0.0% 106 100.0%
Gender * awkwardandstaticposture
Crosstab
awkwardandstaticposture Total
1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00 4.33
Gender Male Count 5 14 25 11 8 7 6 1 2 1 80
Expected Count 5.3 17.4 22.6 9.8 6.8 10.6 4.5 .8 1.5 .8 80.0
% within Gender 6.2% 17.5% 31.2% 13.8% 10.0% 8.8% 7.5% 1.2% 2.5% 1.2% 100.0%
% within
71.4% 60.9% 83.3% 84.6% 88.9% 50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 75.5%
% of Total 4.7% 13.2% 23.6% 10.4% 7.5% 6.6% 5.7% 0.9% 1.9% 0.9% 75.5%
Count 2 9 5 2 1 7 0 0 0 0 26
Expected Count 1.7 5.6 7.4 3.2 2.2 3.4 1.5 .2 .5 .2 26.0
% within Gender 7.7% 34.6% 19.2% 7.7% 3.8% 26.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Female
% within
28.6% 39.1% 16.7% 15.4% 11.1% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 24.5%
% of Total 1.9% 8.5% 4.7% 1.9% 0.9% 6.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 24.5%
Count 7 23 30 13 9 14 6 1 2 1 106
Expected Count 7.0 23.0 30.0 13.0 9.0 14.0 6.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 106.0
% within Gender 6.6% 21.7% 28.3% 12.3% 8.5% 13.2% 5.7% 0.9% 1.9% 0.9% 100.0%
Total
% within
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 6.6% 21.7% 28.3% 12.3% 8.5% 13.2% 5.7% 0.9% 1.9% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 13.332 9 .148
Likelihood Ratio 15.056 9 .089
Linear-by-Linear Association .987 1 .321
N of Valid Cases 106
a. 12 cells (60.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .25.
Gender * repetition
Crosstab
repetition Total
1.00 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00
Expected Count .8 6.0 19.6 22.6 7.5 9.1 6.0 3.0 2.3 3.0 80.0
% within Gender 1.2% 10.0% 22.5% 28.8% 8.8% 12.5% 6.2% 5.0% 3.8% 1.2% 100.0%
% within repetition 100.0% 100.0% 69.2% 76.7% 70.0% 83.3% 62.5% 100.0% 100.0% 25.0% 75.5%
% of Total 0.9% 7.5% 17.0% 21.7% 6.6% 9.4% 4.7% 3.8% 2.8% 0.9% 75.5%
Count 0 0 8 7 3 2 3 0 0 3 26
Expected Count .2 2.0 6.4 7.4 2.5 2.9 2.0 1.0 .7 1.0 26.0
Female % within Gender 0.0% 0.0% 30.8% 26.9% 11.5% 7.7% 11.5% 0.0% 0.0% 11.5% 100.0%
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 7.5% 6.6% 2.8% 1.9% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 2.8% 24.5%
Count 1 8 26 30 10 12 8 4 3 4 106
Expected Count 1.0 8.0 26.0 30.0 10.0 12.0 8.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 106.0
Total % within Gender 0.9% 7.5% 24.5% 28.3% 9.4% 11.3% 7.5% 3.8% 2.8% 3.8% 100.0%
% of Total 0.9% 7.5% 24.5% 28.3% 9.4% 11.3% 7.5% 3.8% 2.8% 3.8% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 12.564a 9 .183

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.065 1 .302
is .25.
Gender * Force
Crosstab
Force Total
1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.67 4.00 4.33
Gender Male Count 4 16 29 10 9 5 2 4 1 80
Expected Count 5.3 16.6 27.9 12.1 7.5 5.3 1.5 3.0 .8 80.0
% within Gender 5.0% 20.0% 36.2% 12.5% 11.2% 6.2% 2.5% 5.0% 1.2% 100.0%
% within Force 57.1% 72.7% 78.4% 62.5% 90.0% 71.4% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 75.5%
% of Total 3.8% 15.1% 27.4% 9.4% 8.5% 4.7% 1.9% 3.8% 0.9% 75.5%
Count 3 6 8 6 1 2 0 0 0 26
Expected Count 1.7 5.4 9.1 3.9 2.5 1.7 .5 1.0 .2 26.0
Female % within Gender 11.5% 23.1% 30.8% 23.1% 3.8% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% within Force 42.9% 27.3% 21.6% 37.5% 10.0% 28.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 24.5%
% of Total 2.8% 5.7% 7.5% 5.7% 0.9% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 24.5%
Count 7 22 37 16 10 7 2 4 1 106
Expected Count 7.0 22.0 37.0 16.0 10.0 7.0 2.0 4.0 1.0 106.0
Total % within Gender 6.6% 20.8% 34.9% 15.1% 9.4% 6.6% 1.9% 3.8% 0.9% 100.0%
% within Force 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 6.6% 20.8% 34.9% 15.1% 9.4% 6.6% 1.9% 3.8% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

is .25.
Gender * Contactstress
Crosstab
Contactstress Total
1.00 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00 4.67
Gender Male Count 1 1 13 28 6 14 4 4 5 2 2 80
Expected Count .8 .8 14.3 27.2 6.8 12.8 6.8 3.8 3.8 1.5 1.5 80.0
% within Gender 1.2% 1.2% 16.2% 35.0% 7.5% 17.5% 5.0% 5.0% 6.2% 2.5% 2.5% 100.0%
% within Contactstress 100.0% 100.0% 68.4% 77.8% 66.7% 82.4% 44.4% 80.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 75.5%
% of Total 0.9% 0.9% 12.3% 26.4% 5.7% 13.2% 3.8% 3.8% 4.7% 1.9% 1.9% 75.5%
Count 0 0 6 8 3 3 5 1 0 0 0 26
Expected Count .2 .2 4.7 8.8 2.2 4.2 2.2 1.2 1.2 .5 .5 26.0
Female % within Gender 0.0% 0.0% 23.1% 30.8% 11.5% 11.5% 19.2% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 5.7% 7.5% 2.8% 2.8% 4.7% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 24.5%
Count 1 1 19 36 9 17 9 5 5 2 2 106
Expected Count 1.0 1.0 19.0 36.0 9.0 17.0 9.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 106.0
Total % within Gender 0.9% 0.9% 17.9% 34.0% 8.5% 16.0% 8.5% 4.7% 4.7% 1.9% 1.9% 100.0%
% of Total 0.9% 0.9% 17.9% 34.0% 8.5% 16.0% 8.5% 4.7% 4.7% 1.9% 1.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

is .25.
Gender * Timeperiod
Crosstab
Timeperiod Total
1.00 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00
Expected Count .8 8.3 17.4 21.9 12.8 6.8 8.3 2.3 .8 .8 80.0
% within Gender 0.0% 10.0% 22.5% 25.0% 16.2% 10.0% 10.0% 3.8% 1.2% 1.2% 100.0%
% within Timeperiod 0.0% 72.7% 78.3% 69.0% 76.5% 88.9% 72.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 75.5%
% of Total 0.0% 7.5% 17.0% 18.9% 12.3% 7.5% 7.5% 2.8% 0.9% 0.9% 75.5%
Count 1 3 5 9 4 1 3 0 0 0 26
Expected Count .2 2.7 5.6 7.1 4.2 2.2 2.7 .7 .2 .2 26.0
% of Total 0.9% 2.8% 4.7% 8.5% 3.8% 0.9% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 24.5%
Count 1 11 23 29 17 9 11 3 1 1 106
Expected Count 1.0 11.0 23.0 29.0 17.0 9.0 11.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 106.0
% of Total 0.9% 10.4% 21.7% 27.4% 16.0% 8.5% 10.4% 2.8% 0.9% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

is .25.
Gender * Workrelatedfactors
Crosstab
Workrelatedfactors Total
1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.25 3.50 3.75 4.00 4.50
Gender Male Count 3 13 8 22 15 5 4 5 2 1 1 1 80
Expected Count 3.0 12.1 10.6 20.4 15.8 4.5 5.3 4.5 1.5 .8 .8 .8 80.0
% within Gender 3.8% 16.2% 10.0% 27.5% 18.8% 6.2% 5.0% 6.2% 2.5% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 100.0%
% within Workrelatedfactors 75.0% 81.2% 57.1% 81.5% 71.4% 83.3% 57.1% 83.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 75.5%
% of Total 2.8% 12.3% 7.5% 20.8% 14.2% 4.7% 3.8% 4.7% 1.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 75.5%
Count 1 3 6 5 6 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 26
Expected Count 1.0 3.9 3.4 6.6 5.2 1.5 1.7 1.5 .5 .2 .2 .2 26.0
Female % within Gender 3.8% 11.5% 23.1% 19.2% 23.1% 3.8% 11.5% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% of Total 0.9% 2.8% 5.7% 4.7% 5.7% 0.9% 2.8% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 24.5%
Count 4 16 14 27 21 6 7 6 2 1 1 1 106
Expected Count 4.0 16.0 14.0 27.0 21.0 6.0 7.0 6.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 106.0
Total % within Gender 3.8% 15.1% 13.2% 25.5% 19.8% 5.7% 6.6% 5.7% 1.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 100.0%
% of Total 3.8% 15.1% 13.2% 25.5% 19.8% 5.7% 6.6% 5.7% 1.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

is .25.
Gender * Environmentalriskfactors
Crosstab
Environmentalriskfactors Total
1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00 4.33
Expected Count 7.5 15.1 27.9 6.8 7.5 8.3 4.5 .8 .8 .8 80.0
% within Gender 11.2% 17.5% 33.8% 10.0% 8.8% 10.0% 5.0% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 100.0%
% within
90.0% 70.0% 73.0% 88.9% 70.0% 72.7% 66.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 75.5%
% of Total 8.5% 13.2% 25.5% 7.5% 6.6% 7.5% 3.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 75.5%
Count 1 6 10 1 3 3 2 0 0 0 26
Expected Count 2.5 4.9 9.1 2.2 2.5 2.7 1.5 .2 .2 .2 26.0
% within Gender 3.8% 23.1% 38.5% 3.8% 11.5% 11.5% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Female
% within
10.0% 30.0% 27.0% 11.1% 30.0% 27.3% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 24.5%
% of Total 0.9% 5.7% 9.4% 0.9% 2.8% 2.8% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 24.5%
Count 10 20 37 9 10 11 6 1 1 1 106
Expected Count 10.0 20.0 37.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 6.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 106.0
% within Gender 9.4% 18.9% 34.9% 8.5% 9.4% 10.4% 5.7% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 100.0%
Total
% within
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 9.4% 18.9% 34.9% 8.5% 9.4% 10.4% 5.7% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
is .25.
Gender * Individualfactors
Crosstab
Individualfactors Total
1.00 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 4.00 4.67
Expected Count .8 3.0 15.1 25.7 11.3 10.6 7.5 3.0 2.3 .8 80.0
% within Gender 1.2% 3.8% 16.2% 33.8% 15.0% 15.0% 8.8% 3.8% 2.5% 0.0% 100.0%
% within Individualfactors 100.0% 75.0% 65.0% 79.4% 80.0% 85.7% 70.0% 75.0% 66.7% 0.0% 75.5%
% of Total 0.9% 2.8% 12.3% 25.5% 11.3% 11.3% 6.6% 2.8% 1.9% 0.0% 75.5%
Count 0 1 7 7 3 2 3 1 1 1 26
Expected Count .2 1.0 4.9 8.3 3.7 3.4 2.5 1.0 .7 .2 26.0
% of Total 0.0% 0.9% 6.6% 6.6% 2.8% 1.9% 2.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 24.5%
Count 1 4 20 34 15 14 10 4 3 1 106
Expected Count 1.0 4.0 20.0 34.0 15.0 14.0 10.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 106.0
% of Total 0.9% 3.8% 18.9% 32.1% 14.2% 13.2% 9.4% 3.8% 2.8% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

is .25.
Gender * Healthfactors
Crosstab
Healthfactors Total
1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.33
Expected Count 6.8 14.3 24.2 10.6 12.1 7.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 80.0
% within Gender 7.5% 16.2% 36.2% 7.5% 18.8% 8.8% 1.2% 1.2% 2.5% 100.0%
% within Healthfactors 66.7% 68.4% 90.6% 42.9% 93.8% 70.0% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 75.5%
% of Total 5.7% 12.3% 27.4% 5.7% 14.2% 6.6% 0.9% 0.9% 1.9% 75.5%
Count 3 6 3 8 1 3 1 1 0 26
Expected Count 2.2 4.7 7.8 3.4 3.9 2.5 .5 .5 .5 26.0
% of Total 2.8% 5.7% 2.8% 7.5% 0.9% 2.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 24.5%
Count 9 19 32 14 16 10 2 2 2 106
Expected Count 9.0 19.0 32.0 14.0 16.0 10.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 106.0
% of Total 8.5% 17.9% 30.2% 13.2% 15.1% 9.4% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

is .49.
Gender * Employeemotivation
Crosstab
Employeemotivation Total
1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.25 3.50
Expected Count 2.3 16.6 15.1 12.1 19.6 6.0 3.0 3.0 2.3 80.0
% within Gender 1.2% 20.0% 20.0% 16.2% 25.0% 6.2% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 100.0%
% within Employeemotivation 33.3% 72.7% 80.0% 81.2% 76.9% 62.5% 75.0% 75.0% 100.0% 75.5%
% of Total 0.9% 15.1% 15.1% 12.3% 18.9% 4.7% 2.8% 2.8% 2.8% 75.5%
Count 2 6 4 3 6 3 1 1 0 26
Expected Count .7 5.4 4.9 3.9 6.4 2.0 1.0 1.0 .7 26.0
% of Total 1.9% 5.7% 3.8% 2.8% 5.7% 2.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 24.5%
Count 3 22 20 16 26 8 4 4 3 106
Expected Count 3.0 22.0 20.0 16.0 26.0 8.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 106.0
% of Total 2.8% 20.8% 18.9% 15.1% 24.5% 7.5% 3.8% 3.8% 2.8% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

is .74.
Gender * Organizationsupport
Crosstab
Organizationsupport Total
1.00 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00
Expected Count .8 6.8 9.1 21.9 15.8 9.1 9.1 3.0 3.8 .8 80.0
% within Gender 0.0% 10.0% 12.5% 26.2% 23.8% 12.5% 7.5% 3.8% 3.8% 0.0% 100.0%
% within Organizationsupport 0.0% 88.9% 83.3% 72.4% 90.5% 83.3% 50.0% 75.0% 60.0% 0.0% 75.5%
% of Total 0.0% 7.5% 9.4% 19.8% 17.9% 9.4% 5.7% 2.8% 2.8% 0.0% 75.5%
Count 1 1 2 8 2 2 6 1 2 1 26
Expected Count .2 2.2 2.9 7.1 5.2 2.9 2.9 1.0 1.2 .2 26.0
% of Total 0.9% 0.9% 1.9% 7.5% 1.9% 1.9% 5.7% 0.9% 1.9% 0.9% 24.5%
Count 1 9 12 29 21 12 12 4 5 1 106
Expected Count 1.0 9.0 12.0 29.0 21.0 12.0 12.0 4.0 5.0 1.0 106.0
% of Total 0.9% 8.5% 11.3% 27.4% 19.8% 11.3% 11.3% 3.8% 4.7% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

is .25.
Gender * Productivityimprovement
Crosstab
Productivityimprovement Total
1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.40 3.60
Gender Male Count 3 5 8 8 10 19 13 6 2 4 1 1 80
Expected Count 3.0 5.3 8.3 9.8 8.3 16.6 13.6 6.0 4.5 3.0 .8 .8 80.0
% within Gender 3.8% 6.2% 10.0% 10.0% 12.5% 23.8% 16.2% 7.5% 2.5% 5.0% 1.2% 1.2% 100.0%
% within
75.0% 71.4% 72.7% 61.5% 90.9% 86.4% 72.2% 75.0% 33.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 75.5%
% of Total 2.8% 4.7% 7.5% 7.5% 9.4% 17.9% 12.3% 5.7% 1.9% 3.8% 0.9% 0.9% 75.5%
Count 1 2 3 5 1 3 5 2 4 0 0 0 26
Expected Count 1.0 1.7 2.7 3.2 2.7 5.4 4.4 2.0 1.5 1.0 .2 .2 26.0
% within Gender 3.8% 7.7% 11.5% 19.2% 3.8% 11.5% 19.2% 7.7% 15.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Female
% within
25.0% 28.6% 27.3% 38.5% 9.1% 13.6% 27.8% 25.0% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 24.5%
% of Total 0.9% 1.9% 2.8% 4.7% 0.9% 2.8% 4.7% 1.9% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 24.5%
Count 4 7 11 13 11 22 18 8 6 4 1 1 106
Expected Count 4.0 7.0 11.0 13.0 11.0 22.0 18.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 106.0
% within Gender 3.8% 6.6% 10.4% 12.3% 10.4% 20.8% 17.0% 7.5% 5.7% 3.8% 0.9% 0.9% 100.0%
Total
% within
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 3.8% 6.6% 10.4% 12.3% 10.4% 20.8% 17.0% 7.5% 5.7% 3.8% 0.9% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
is .25.
Age Group * awkwardandstaticposture
Crosstab
1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00 4.33
Age Group <30 years Count 2 8 13 3 2 7 1 0 0 0 36
Expected Count 2.4 7.8 10.2 4.4 3.1 4.8 2.0 .3 .7 .3 36.0
% within Age Group 5.6% 22.2% 36.1% 8.3% 5.6% 19.4% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% within
28.6% 34.8% 43.3% 23.1% 22.2% 50.0% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 34.0%
% of Total 1.9% 7.5% 12.3% 2.8% 1.9% 6.6% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 34.0%
Count 5 13 16 7 5 5 5 0 1 0 57
Expected Count 3.8 12.4 16.1 7.0 4.8 7.5 3.2 .5 1.1 .5 57.0
% within Age Group 8.8% 22.8% 28.1% 12.3% 8.8% 8.8% 8.8% 0.0% 1.8% 0.0% 100.0%
30-40 years
% within
71.4% 56.5% 53.3% 53.8% 55.6% 35.7% 83.3% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 53.8%
% of Total 4.7% 12.3% 15.1% 6.6% 4.7% 4.7% 4.7% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 53.8%
Count 0 2 1 3 2 2 0 1 1 1 13
Expected Count .9 2.8 3.7 1.6 1.1 1.7 .7 .1 .2 .1 13.0
% within Age Group 0.0% 15.4% 7.7% 23.1% 15.4% 15.4% 0.0% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 100.0%
>40 years
% within
0.0% 8.7% 3.3% 23.1% 22.2% 14.3% 0.0% 100.0% 50.0% 100.0% 12.3%
% of Total 0.0% 1.9% 0.9% 2.8% 1.9% 1.9% 0.0% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 12.3%
Count 7 23 30 13 9 14 6 1 2 1 106
Expected Count 7.0 23.0 30.0 13.0 9.0 14.0 6.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 106.0
% within Age Group 6.6% 21.7% 28.3% 12.3% 8.5% 13.2% 5.7% 0.9% 1.9% 0.9% 100.0%
Total
% within
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 6.6% 21.7% 28.3% 12.3% 8.5% 13.2% 5.7% 0.9% 1.9% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

is .12.
Age Group * repetition
Crosstab
repetition Total
1.00 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00
Expected Count .3 2.7 8.8 10.2 3.4 4.1 2.7 1.4 1.0 1.4 36.0
% within Age Group 0.0% 2.8% 22.2% 33.3% 16.7% 11.1% 5.6% 0.0% 0.0% 8.3% 100.0%
% of Total 0.0% 0.9% 7.5% 11.3% 5.7% 3.8% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 2.8% 34.0%
Count 0 6 17 15 4 6 3 3 2 1 57
Expected Count .5 4.3 14.0 16.1 5.4 6.5 4.3 2.2 1.6 2.2 57.0
30-40 years % within Age Group 0.0% 10.5% 29.8% 26.3% 7.0% 10.5% 5.3% 5.3% 3.5% 1.8% 100.0%
% of Total 0.0% 5.7% 16.0% 14.2% 3.8% 5.7% 2.8% 2.8% 1.9% 0.9% 53.8%
Count 1 1 1 3 0 2 3 1 1 0 13
Expected Count .1 1.0 3.2 3.7 1.2 1.5 1.0 .5 .4 .5 13.0
>40 years % within Age Group 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 23.1% 0.0% 15.4% 23.1% 7.7% 7.7% 0.0% 100.0%
% of Total 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 2.8% 0.0% 1.9% 2.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 12.3%
Count 1 8 26 30 10 12 8 4 3 4 106
Expected Count 1.0 8.0 26.0 30.0 10.0 12.0 8.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 106.0
Total % within Age Group 0.9% 7.5% 24.5% 28.3% 9.4% 11.3% 7.5% 3.8% 2.8% 3.8% 100.0%
% of Total 0.9% 7.5% 24.5% 28.3% 9.4% 11.3% 7.5% 3.8% 2.8% 3.8% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
is .12.
Age Group * Force
Crosstab
Force Total
1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.67 4.00 4.33
Age Group <30 years Count 2 8 14 8 1 3 0 0 0 36
Expected Count 2.4 7.5 12.6 5.4 3.4 2.4 .7 1.4 .3 36.0
% within Age Group 5.6% 22.2% 38.9% 22.2% 2.8% 8.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% within Force 28.6% 36.4% 37.8% 50.0% 10.0% 42.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 34.0%
% of Total 1.9% 7.5% 13.2% 7.5% 0.9% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 34.0%
Count 5 11 22 5 8 4 1 1 0 57
Expected Count 3.8 11.8 19.9 8.6 5.4 3.8 1.1 2.2 .5 57.0
30-40 years % within Age Group 8.8% 19.3% 38.6% 8.8% 14.0% 7.0% 1.8% 1.8% 0.0% 100.0%
% within Force 71.4% 50.0% 59.5% 31.2% 80.0% 57.1% 50.0% 25.0% 0.0% 53.8%
% of Total 4.7% 10.4% 20.8% 4.7% 7.5% 3.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 53.8%
Count 0 3 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 13
Expected Count .9 2.7 4.5 2.0 1.2 .9 .2 .5 .1 13.0
>40 years % within Age Group 0.0% 23.1% 7.7% 23.1% 7.7% 0.0% 7.7% 23.1% 7.7% 100.0%
% within Force 0.0% 13.6% 2.7% 18.8% 10.0% 0.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 12.3%
% of Total 0.0% 2.8% 0.9% 2.8% 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 2.8% 0.9% 12.3%
Count 7 22 37 16 10 7 2 4 1 106
Expected Count 7.0 22.0 37.0 16.0 10.0 7.0 2.0 4.0 1.0 106.0
Total % within Age Group 6.6% 20.8% 34.9% 15.1% 9.4% 6.6% 1.9% 3.8% 0.9% 100.0%
% within Force 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 6.6% 20.8% 34.9% 15.1% 9.4% 6.6% 1.9% 3.8% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
is .12.
Age Group * Contactstress
Crosstab
Contactstress Total
1.00 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00 4.67
Age Group <30 years Count 0 0 5 17 3 5 4 2 0 0 0 36
Expected Count .3 .3 6.5 12.2 3.1 5.8 3.1 1.7 1.7 .7 .7 36.0
% within Age Group 0.0% 0.0% 13.9% 47.2% 8.3% 13.9% 11.1% 5.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 4.7% 16.0% 2.8% 4.7% 3.8% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 34.0%
Count 1 1 13 15 5 11 5 2 2 2 0 57
Expected Count .5 .5 10.2 19.4 4.8 9.1 4.8 2.7 2.7 1.1 1.1 57.0
30-40 years % within Age Group 1.8% 1.8% 22.8% 26.3% 8.8% 19.3% 8.8% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 0.0% 100.0%
% of Total 0.9% 0.9% 12.3% 14.2% 4.7% 10.4% 4.7% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 0.0% 53.8%
Count 0 0 1 4 1 1 0 1 3 0 2 13
Expected Count .1 .1 2.3 4.4 1.1 2.1 1.1 .6 .6 .2 .2 13.0
>40 years % within Age Group 0.0% 0.0% 7.7% 30.8% 7.7% 7.7% 0.0% 7.7% 23.1% 0.0% 15.4% 100.0%
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 3.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 2.8% 0.0% 1.9% 12.3%
Count 1 1 19 36 9 17 9 5 5 2 2 106
Expected Count 1.0 1.0 19.0 36.0 9.0 17.0 9.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 106.0
Total % within Age Group 0.9% 0.9% 17.9% 34.0% 8.5% 16.0% 8.5% 4.7% 4.7% 1.9% 1.9% 100.0%
% of Total 0.9% 0.9% 17.9% 34.0% 8.5% 16.0% 8.5% 4.7% 4.7% 1.9% 1.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
is .12.
Age Group * Timeperiod
Crosstab
Timeperiod Total
1.00 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00
Expected Count .3 3.7 7.8 9.8 5.8 3.1 3.7 1.0 .3 .3 36.0
% within Age Group 0.0% 2.8% 25.0% 41.7% 13.9% 2.8% 13.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% of Total 0.0% 0.9% 8.5% 14.2% 4.7% 0.9% 4.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 34.0%
Count 1 8 11 14 9 8 2 2 1 1 57
Expected Count .5 5.9 12.4 15.6 9.1 4.8 5.9 1.6 .5 .5 57.0
% of Total 0.9% 7.5% 10.4% 13.2% 8.5% 7.5% 1.9% 1.9% 0.9% 0.9% 53.8%
Count 0 2 3 0 3 0 4 1 0 0 13
Expected Count .1 1.3 2.8 3.6 2.1 1.1 1.3 .4 .1 .1 13.0
% of Total 0.0% 1.9% 2.8% 0.0% 2.8% 0.0% 3.8% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 12.3%
Count 1 11 23 29 17 9 11 3 1 1 106
Expected Count 1.0 11.0 23.0 29.0 17.0 9.0 11.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 106.0
% of Total 0.9% 10.4% 21.7% 27.4% 16.0% 8.5% 10.4% 2.8% 0.9% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
is .12.
Age Group * Workrelatedfactors
Crosstab
1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.25 3.50 3.75 4.00 4.50
Expected Count 1.4 5.4 4.8 9.2 7.1 2.0 2.4 2.0 .7 .3 .3 .3 36
% within Age Group 2.8% 11.1% 25.0% 22.2% 22.2% 2.8% 8.3% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 2.8% 0.0% 100.0
% within Workrelatedfactors 25.0% 25.0% 64.3% 29.6% 38.1% 16.7% 42.9% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 34.0
% of Total 0.9% 3.8% 8.5% 7.5% 7.5% 0.9% 2.8% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 34.0
Count 3 9 5 19 10 4 4 2 0 0 0 1
Expected Count 2.2 8.6 7.5 14.5 11.3 3.2 3.8 3.2 1.1 .5 .5 .5 57
30-40 years % within Age Group 5.3% 15.8% 8.8% 33.3% 17.5% 7.0% 7.0% 3.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.8% 100.0
% of Total 2.8% 8.5% 4.7% 17.9% 9.4% 3.8% 3.8% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 53.8
Count 0 3 0 0 3 1 0 3 2 1 0 0
Expected Count .5 2.0 1.7 3.3 2.6 .7 .9 .7 .2 .1 .1 .1 13
>40 years % within Age Group 0.0% 23.1% 0.0% 0.0% 23.1% 7.7% 0.0% 23.1% 15.4% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0
% of Total 0.0% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 2.8% 0.9% 0.0% 2.8% 1.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 12.3
Count 4 16 14 27 21 6 7 6 2 1 1 1 1
Expected Count 4.0 16.0 14.0 27.0 21.0 6.0 7.0 6.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 106
Total % within Age Group 3.8% 15.1% 13.2% 25.5% 19.8% 5.7% 6.6% 5.7% 1.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 100.0
% of Total 3.8% 15.1% 13.2% 25.5% 19.8% 5.7% 6.6% 5.7% 1.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 100.0
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
is .12.
Age Group * Environmentalriskfactors
Crosstab
1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00 4.33
Expected Count 3.4 6.8 12.6 3.1 3.4 3.7 2.0 .3 .3 .3 36.0
% within Age Group 8.3% 16.7% 36.1% 11.1% 5.6% 13.9% 8.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% within
30.0% 30.0% 35.1% 44.4% 20.0% 45.5% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 34.0%
% of Total 2.8% 5.7% 12.3% 3.8% 1.9% 4.7% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 34.0%
Count 5 13 19 4 6 6 2 1 0 1 57
Expected Count 5.4 10.8 19.9 4.8 5.4 5.9 3.2 .5 .5 .5 57.0
% within Age Group 8.8% 22.8% 33.3% 7.0% 10.5% 10.5% 3.5% 1.8% 0.0% 1.8% 100.0%
30-40 years
% within
50.0% 65.0% 51.4% 44.4% 60.0% 54.5% 33.3% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 53.8%
% of Total 4.7% 12.3% 17.9% 3.8% 5.7% 5.7% 1.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 53.8%
Count 2 1 5 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 13
Expected Count 1.2 2.5 4.5 1.1 1.2 1.3 .7 .1 .1 .1 13.0
% within Age Group 15.4% 7.7% 38.5% 7.7% 15.4% 0.0% 7.7% 0.0% 7.7% 0.0% 100.0%
>40 years
% within
20.0% 5.0% 13.5% 11.1% 20.0% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 12.3%
% of Total 1.9% 0.9% 4.7% 0.9% 1.9% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 12.3%
Count 10 20 37 9 10 11 6 1 1 1 106
Expected Count 10.0 20.0 37.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 6.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 106.0
% within Age Group 9.4% 18.9% 34.9% 8.5% 9.4% 10.4% 5.7% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 100.0%
Total
% within
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 9.4% 18.9% 34.9% 8.5% 9.4% 10.4% 5.7% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

is .12.
Age Group * Individualfactors
Crosstab
1.00 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 4.00 4.67
Expected Count .3 1.4 6.8 11.5 5.1 4.8 3.4 1.4 1.0 .3 36.0
% within Age Group 0.0% 2.8% 19.4% 33.3% 16.7% 11.1% 8.3% 2.8% 2.8% 2.8% 100.0%
% of Total 0.0% 0.9% 6.6% 11.3% 5.7% 3.8% 2.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 34.0%
Count 0 2 12 18 7 8 5 3 2 0 57
Expected Count .5 2.2 10.8 18.3 8.1 7.5 5.4 2.2 1.6 .5 57.0
% of Total 0.0% 1.9% 11.3% 17.0% 6.6% 7.5% 4.7% 2.8% 1.9% 0.0% 53.8%
Count 1 1 1 4 2 2 2 0 0 0 13
Expected Count .1 .5 2.5 4.2 1.8 1.7 1.2 .5 .4 .1 13.0
% of Total 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 3.8% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.3%
Count 1 4 20 34 15 14 10 4 3 1 106
Expected Count 1.0 4.0 20.0 34.0 15.0 14.0 10.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 106.0
% of Total 0.9% 3.8% 18.9% 32.1% 14.2% 13.2% 9.4% 3.8% 2.8% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
is .12.
Age Group * Healthfactors
Crosstab
Healthfactors Total
1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.33
Expected Count 3.1 6.5 10.9 4.8 5.4 3.4 .7 .7 .7 36.0
% within Age Group 2.8% 16.7% 25.0% 27.8% 11.1% 11.1% 2.8% 2.8% 0.0% 100.0%
% of Total 0.9% 5.7% 8.5% 9.4% 3.8% 3.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 34.0%
Count 5 8 19 4 12 5 1 1 2 57
Expected Count 4.8 10.2 17.2 7.5 8.6 5.4 1.1 1.1 1.1 57.0
% of Total 4.7% 7.5% 17.9% 3.8% 11.3% 4.7% 0.9% 0.9% 1.9% 53.8%
Count 3 5 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 13
Expected Count 1.1 2.3 3.9 1.7 2.0 1.2 .2 .2 .2 13.0
% of Total 2.8% 4.7% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.3%
Count 9 19 32 14 16 10 2 2 2 106
Expected Count 9.0 19.0 32.0 14.0 16.0 10.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 106.0
% of Total 8.5% 17.9% 30.2% 13.2% 15.1% 9.4% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
is .25.
Age Group * Employeemotivation
Crosstab
1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.25 3.50
Expected Count 1.0 7.5 6.8 5.4 8.8 2.7 1.4 1.4 1.0 36.0
% within Age Group 5.6% 16.7% 11.1% 19.4% 30.6% 11.1% 2.8% 2.8% 0.0% 100.0%
% of Total 1.9% 5.7% 3.8% 6.6% 10.4% 3.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 34.0%
Count 1 13 12 9 13 3 2 2 2 57
Expected Count 1.6 11.8 10.8 8.6 14.0 4.3 2.2 2.2 1.6 57.0
% of Total 0.9% 12.3% 11.3% 8.5% 12.3% 2.8% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 53.8%
Count 0 3 4 0 2 1 1 1 1 13
Expected Count .4 2.7 2.5 2.0 3.2 1.0 .5 .5 .4 13.0
% of Total 0.0% 2.8% 3.8% 0.0% 1.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 12.3%
Count 3 22 20 16 26 8 4 4 3 106
Expected Count 3.0 22.0 20.0 16.0 26.0 8.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 106.0
% of Total 2.8% 20.8% 18.9% 15.1% 24.5% 7.5% 3.8% 3.8% 2.8% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
is .37.
Age Group * Organizationsupport
Crosstab
1.00 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00
Expected Count .3 3.1 4.1 9.8 7.1 4.1 4.1 1.4 1.7 .3 36.0
% within Age Group 2.8% 5.6% 5.6% 38.9% 22.2% 5.6% 11.1% 2.8% 5.6% 0.0% 100.0%
% of Total 0.9% 1.9% 1.9% 13.2% 7.5% 1.9% 3.8% 0.9% 1.9% 0.0% 34.0%
Count 0 6 9 9 12 9 7 3 1 1 57
Expected Count .5 4.8 6.5 15.6 11.3 6.5 6.5 2.2 2.7 .5 57.0
% of Total 0.0% 5.7% 8.5% 8.5% 11.3% 8.5% 6.6% 2.8% 0.9% 0.9% 53.8%
Count 0 1 1 6 1 1 1 0 2 0 13
Expected Count .1 1.1 1.5 3.6 2.6 1.5 1.5 .5 .6 .1 13.0
% of Total 0.0% 0.9% 0.9% 5.7% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 1.9% 0.0% 12.3%
Count 1 9 12 29 21 12 12 4 5 1 106
Expected Count 1.0 9.0 12.0 29.0 21.0 12.0 12.0 4.0 5.0 1.0 106.0
% of Total 0.9% 8.5% 11.3% 27.4% 19.8% 11.3% 11.3% 3.8% 4.7% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
is .12.
Age Group * Productivityimprovement
Crosstab
1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.40 3.60
Expected Count 1.4 2.4 3.7 4.4 3.7 7.5 6.1 2.7 2.0 1.4 .3 .3 36
% within Age Group 2.8% 8.3% 8.3% 13.9% 5.6% 13.9% 19.4% 8.3% 11.1% 2.8% 2.8% 2.8% 100.0
% within
25.0% 42.9% 27.3% 38.5% 18.2% 22.7% 38.9% 37.5% 66.7% 25.0% 100.0% 100.0% 34.0
% of Total 0.9% 2.8% 2.8% 4.7% 1.9% 4.7% 6.6% 2.8% 3.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 34.0
Count 1 4 6 7 7 14 10 4 2 2 0 0
Expected Count 2.2 3.8 5.9 7.0 5.9 11.8 9.7 4.3 3.2 2.2 .5 .5 57
% within Age Group 1.8% 7.0% 10.5% 12.3% 12.3% 24.6% 17.5% 7.0% 3.5% 3.5% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0
30-40 years
% within
25.0% 57.1% 54.5% 53.8% 63.6% 63.6% 55.6% 50.0% 33.3% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 53.8
% of Total 0.9% 3.8% 5.7% 6.6% 6.6% 13.2% 9.4% 3.8% 1.9% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 53.8
Count 2 0 2 1 2 3 1 1 0 1 0 0
Expected Count .5 .9 1.3 1.6 1.3 2.7 2.2 1.0 .7 .5 .1 .1 13
% within Age Group 15.4% 0.0% 15.4% 7.7% 15.4% 23.1% 7.7% 7.7% 0.0% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0
>40 years
% within
50.0% 0.0% 18.2% 7.7% 18.2% 13.6% 5.6% 12.5% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.3
% of Total 1.9% 0.0% 1.9% 0.9% 1.9% 2.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 12.3
Count 4 7 11 13 11 22 18 8 6 4 1 1 1
Expected Count 4.0 7.0 11.0 13.0 11.0 22.0 18.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 106
% within Age Group 3.8% 6.6% 10.4% 12.3% 10.4% 20.8% 17.0% 7.5% 5.7% 3.8% 0.9% 0.9% 100.0
Total
% within
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0
% of Total 3.8% 6.6% 10.4% 12.3% 10.4% 20.8% 17.0% 7.5% 5.7% 3.8% 0.9% 0.9% 100.0
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

is .12.
Occupation * awkwardandstaticposture
Crosstab
1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00 4.33
Occupation Mason Count 2 9 9 5 3 3 2 1 0 1 35
Expected Count 2.3 7.6 9.9 4.3 3.0 4.6 2.0 .3 .7 .3 35.0
% within Occupation 5.7% 25.7% 25.7% 14.3% 8.6% 8.6% 5.7% 2.9% 0.0% 2.9% 100.0%
% within
28.6% 39.1% 30.0% 38.5% 33.3% 21.4% 33.3% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 33.0%
% of Total 1.9% 8.5% 8.5% 4.7% 2.8% 2.8% 1.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 33.0%
Count 2 10 5 2 1 7 0 0 0 0 27
Expected Count 1.8 5.9 7.6 3.3 2.3 3.6 1.5 .3 .5 .3 27.0
Mazdoor
% within
28.6% 43.5% 16.7% 15.4% 11.1% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.5%
% of Total 1.9% 9.4% 4.7% 1.9% 0.9% 6.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.5%
Count 2 2 9 4 4 2 1 0 1 0 25
Expected Count 1.7 5.4 7.1 3.1 2.1 3.3 1.4 .2 .5 .2 25.0
Laymen
% within
28.6% 8.7% 30.0% 30.8% 44.4% 14.3% 16.7% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 23.6%
% of Total 1.9% 1.9% 8.5% 3.8% 3.8% 1.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 23.6%
Count 1 2 7 2 1 2 3 0 1 0 19
Expected Count 1.3 4.1 5.4 2.3 1.6 2.5 1.1 .2 .4 .2 19.0
Barbender
% within
14.3% 8.7% 23.3% 15.4% 11.1% 14.3% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 17.9%
% of Total 0.9% 1.9% 6.6% 1.9% 0.9% 1.9% 2.8% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 17.9%
Count 7 23 30 13 9 14 6 1 2 1 106
Expected Count 7.0 23.0 30.0 13.0 9.0 14.0 6.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 106.0
Total
% within
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 6.6% 21.7% 28.3% 12.3% 8.5% 13.2% 5.7% 0.9% 1.9% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
is .18.
Occupation * repetition
Crosstab
repetition Total
1.00 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00

Expected Count .3 2.6 8.6 9.9 3.3 4.0 2.6 1.3 1.0 1.3 35.0
% of Total 0.9% 3.8% 5.7% 11.3% 1.9% 2.8% 3.8% 1.9% 0.9% 0.0% 33.0%
Count 0 0 9 7 3 2 3 0 0 3 27
Expected Count .3 2.0 6.6 7.6 2.5 3.1 2.0 1.0 .8 1.0 27.0
Mazdoor % within Occupation 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 25.9% 11.1% 7.4% 11.1% 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% 100.0%
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 8.5% 6.6% 2.8% 1.9% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 2.8% 25.5%
Count 0 3 5 8 2 5 0 0 2 0 25
Expected Count .2 1.9 6.1 7.1 2.4 2.8 1.9 .9 .7 .9 25.0
Laymen % within Occupation 0.0% 12.0% 20.0% 32.0% 8.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% of Total 0.0% 2.8% 4.7% 7.5% 1.9% 4.7% 0.0% 0.0% 1.9% 0.0% 23.6%
Count 0 1 6 3 3 2 1 2 0 1 19
Expected Count .2 1.4 4.7 5.4 1.8 2.2 1.4 .7 .5 .7 19.0
Barbender % within Occupation 0.0% 5.3% 31.6% 15.8% 15.8% 10.5% 5.3% 10.5% 0.0% 5.3% 100.0%
% of Total 0.0% 0.9% 5.7% 2.8% 2.8% 1.9% 0.9% 1.9% 0.0% 0.9% 17.9%
Count 1 8 26 30 10 12 8 4 3 4 106
Expected Count 1.0 8.0 26.0 30.0 10.0 12.0 8.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 106.0
Total % within Occupation 0.9% 7.5% 24.5% 28.3% 9.4% 11.3% 7.5% 3.8% 2.8% 3.8% 100.0%
% of Total 0.9% 7.5% 24.5% 28.3% 9.4% 11.3% 7.5% 3.8% 2.8% 3.8% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
is .18.
Occupation * Force
Crosstab
Force Total
1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.67 4.00 4.33
Occupation Mason Count 2 7 11 4 6 1 1 2 1 35
Expected Count 2.3 7.3 12.2 5.3 3.3 2.3 .7 1.3 .3 35.0
% within Occupation 5.7% 20.0% 31.4% 11.4% 17.1% 2.9% 2.9% 5.7% 2.9% 100.0%
% within Force 28.6% 31.8% 29.7% 25.0% 60.0% 14.3% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 33.0%
% of Total 1.9% 6.6% 10.4% 3.8% 5.7% 0.9% 0.9% 1.9% 0.9% 33.0%
Count 3 7 8 6 1 2 0 0 0 27
Expected Count 1.8 5.6 9.4 4.1 2.5 1.8 .5 1.0 .3 27.0
Mazdoor % within Occupation 11.1% 25.9% 29.6% 22.2% 3.7% 7.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% within Force 42.9% 31.8% 21.6% 37.5% 10.0% 28.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.5%
% of Total 2.8% 6.6% 7.5% 5.7% 0.9% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.5%
Count 2 5 9 4 2 0 1 2 0 25
Expected Count 1.7 5.2 8.7 3.8 2.4 1.7 .5 .9 .2 25.0
Laymen % within Occupation 8.0% 20.0% 36.0% 16.0% 8.0% 0.0% 4.0% 8.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% within Force 28.6% 22.7% 24.3% 25.0% 20.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 23.6%
% of Total 1.9% 4.7% 8.5% 3.8% 1.9% 0.0% 0.9% 1.9% 0.0% 23.6%
Count 0 3 9 2 1 4 0 0 0 19
Expected Count 1.3 3.9 6.6 2.9 1.8 1.3 .4 .7 .2 19.0
Barbender % within Occupation 0.0% 15.8% 47.4% 10.5% 5.3% 21.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% within Force 0.0% 13.6% 24.3% 12.5% 10.0% 57.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 17.9%
% of Total 0.0% 2.8% 8.5% 1.9% 0.9% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 17.9%
Count 7 22 37 16 10 7 2 4 1 106
Expected Count 7.0 22.0 37.0 16.0 10.0 7.0 2.0 4.0 1.0 106.0
Total % within Occupation 6.6% 20.8% 34.9% 15.1% 9.4% 6.6% 1.9% 3.8% 0.9% 100.0%
% within Force 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 6.6% 20.8% 34.9% 15.1% 9.4% 6.6% 1.9% 3.8% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

is .18.
Occupation * Contactstress
Crosstab
Contactstress Total
1.00 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00 4.67
Occupation Mason Count 0 1 5 12 2 7 2 1 3 0 2 35
Expected Count .3 .3 6.3 11.9 3.0 5.6 3.0 1.7 1.7 .7 .7 35.0
% within Occupation 0.0% 2.9% 14.3% 34.3% 5.7% 20.0% 5.7% 2.9% 8.6% 0.0% 5.7% 100.0%
% of Total 0.0% 0.9% 4.7% 11.3% 1.9% 6.6% 1.9% 0.9% 2.8% 0.0% 1.9% 33.0%
Count 0 0 6 8 3 4 5 1 0 0 0 27
Expected Count .3 .3 4.8 9.2 2.3 4.3 2.3 1.3 1.3 .5 .5 27.0
Mazdoor % within Occupation 0.0% 0.0% 22.2% 29.6% 11.1% 14.8% 18.5% 3.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 5.7% 7.5% 2.8% 3.8% 4.7% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.5%
Count 1 0 5 10 1 4 0 2 1 1 0 25
Expected Count .2 .2 4.5 8.5 2.1 4.0 2.1 1.2 1.2 .5 .5 25.0
Laymen % within Occupation 4.0% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 4.0% 16.0% 0.0% 8.0% 4.0% 4.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% of Total 0.9% 0.0% 4.7% 9.4% 0.9% 3.8% 0.0% 1.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 23.6%
Count 0 0 3 6 3 2 2 1 1 1 0 19
Expected Count .2 .2 3.4 6.5 1.6 3.0 1.6 .9 .9 .4 .4 19.0
Barbender % within Occupation 0.0% 0.0% 15.8% 31.6% 15.8% 10.5% 10.5% 5.3% 5.3% 5.3% 0.0% 100.0%
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 2.8% 5.7% 2.8% 1.9% 1.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 17.9%
Count 1 1 19 36 9 17 9 5 5 2 2 106
Expected Count 1.0 1.0 19.0 36.0 9.0 17.0 9.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 106.0
Total % within Occupation 0.9% 0.9% 17.9% 34.0% 8.5% 16.0% 8.5% 4.7% 4.7% 1.9% 1.9% 100.0%
% of Total 0.9% 0.9% 17.9% 34.0% 8.5% 16.0% 8.5% 4.7% 4.7% 1.9% 1.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

is .18.
Occupation * Timeperiod
Crosstab
Timeperiod Total
1.00 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00
Expected Count .3 3.6 7.6 9.6 5.6 3.0 3.6 1.0 .3 .3 35.0
% of Total 0.0% 4.7% 5.7% 6.6% 5.7% 2.8% 3.8% 1.9% 0.9% 0.9% 33.0%
Count 1 3 6 9 4 1 3 0 0 0 27
Expected Count .3 2.8 5.9 7.4 4.3 2.3 2.8 .8 .3 .3 27.0
% of Total 0.9% 2.8% 5.7% 8.5% 3.8% 0.9% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.5%
Count 0 1 8 6 5 1 4 0 0 0 25
Expected Count .2 2.6 5.4 6.8 4.0 2.1 2.6 .7 .2 .2 25.0
% of Total 0.0% 0.9% 7.5% 5.7% 4.7% 0.9% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 23.6%
Count 0 2 3 7 2 4 0 1 0 0 19
Expected Count .2 2.0 4.1 5.2 3.0 1.6 2.0 .5 .2 .2 19.0
% of Total 0.0% 1.9% 2.8% 6.6% 1.9% 3.8% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 17.9%
Count 1 11 23 29 17 9 11 3 1 1 106
Expected Count 1.0 11.0 23.0 29.0 17.0 9.0 11.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 106.0
% of Total 0.9% 10.4% 21.7% 27.4% 16.0% 8.5% 10.4% 2.8% 0.9% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

is .18.
Occupation * Workrelatedfactors
Crosstab
1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.25 3.50 3.75 4.00 4.50
Occupation Mason Count 2 6 2 11 6 2 1 2 2 0 0 1 3
Expected Count 1.3 5.3 4.6 8.9 6.9 2.0 2.3 2.0 .7 .3 .3 .3 35
% within Occupation 5.7% 17.1% 5.7% 31.4% 17.1% 5.7% 2.9% 5.7% 5.7% 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% 100.0%
% of Total 1.9% 5.7% 1.9% 10.4% 5.7% 1.9% 0.9% 1.9% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 33.0%
Count 1 3 6 5 7 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 2
Expected Count 1.0 4.1 3.6 6.9 5.3 1.5 1.8 1.5 .5 .3 .3 .3 27
Mazdoor % within Occupation 3.7% 11.1% 22.2% 18.5% 25.9% 3.7% 11.1% 3.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% of Total 0.9% 2.8% 5.7% 4.7% 6.6% 0.9% 2.8% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.5%
Count 1 5 3 4 4 1 2 3 0 1 1 0 2
Expected Count .9 3.8 3.3 6.4 5.0 1.4 1.7 1.4 .5 .2 .2 .2 25
Laymen % within Occupation 4.0% 20.0% 12.0% 16.0% 16.0% 4.0% 8.0% 12.0% 0.0% 4.0% 4.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% of Total 0.9% 4.7% 2.8% 3.8% 3.8% 0.9% 1.9% 2.8% 0.0% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 23.6%
Count 0 2 3 7 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Expected Count .7 2.9 2.5 4.8 3.8 1.1 1.3 1.1 .4 .2 .2 .2 19
Barbender % within Occupation 0.0% 10.5% 15.8% 36.8% 21.1% 10.5% 5.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% of Total 0.0% 1.9% 2.8% 6.6% 3.8% 1.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 17.9%
Count 4 16 14 27 21 6 7 6 2 1 1 1 10
Expected Count 4.0 16.0 14.0 27.0 21.0 6.0 7.0 6.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 106
Total % within Occupation 3.8% 15.1% 13.2% 25.5% 19.8% 5.7% 6.6% 5.7% 1.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 100.0%
% of Total 3.8% 15.1% 13.2% 25.5% 19.8% 5.7% 6.6% 5.7% 1.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

is .18.
Occupation * Environmentalriskfactors
Crosstab
1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00 4.33
Expected Count 3.3 6.6 12.2 3.0 3.3 3.6 2.0 .3 .3 .3 35.0
% within
30.0% 35.0% 29.7% 44.4% 50.0% 9.1% 33.3% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 33.0%
% of Total 2.8% 6.6% 10.4% 3.8% 4.7% 0.9% 1.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 33.0%
Count 1 7 10 1 3 3 2 0 0 0 27
Expected Count 2.5 5.1 9.4 2.3 2.5 2.8 1.5 .3 .3 .3 27.0
Mazdoor
% within
10.0% 35.0% 27.0% 11.1% 30.0% 27.3% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.5%
% of Total 0.9% 6.6% 9.4% 0.9% 2.8% 2.8% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.5%
Count 5 2 9 2 2 3 2 0 0 0 25
Expected Count 2.4 4.7 8.7 2.1 2.4 2.6 1.4 .2 .2 .2 25.0
Laymen
% within
50.0% 10.0% 24.3% 22.2% 20.0% 27.3% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 23.6%
% of Total 4.7% 1.9% 8.5% 1.9% 1.9% 2.8% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 23.6%
Count 1 4 7 2 0 4 0 0 0 1 19
Expected Count 1.8 3.6 6.6 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.1 .2 .2 .2 19.0
Barbender
% within
10.0% 20.0% 18.9% 22.2% 0.0% 36.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 17.9%
% of Total 0.9% 3.8% 6.6% 1.9% 0.0% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 17.9%
Count 10 20 37 9 10 11 6 1 1 1 106
Expected Count 10.0 20.0 37.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 6.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 106.0
Total
% within
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 9.4% 18.9% 34.9% 8.5% 9.4% 10.4% 5.7% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
is .18.
Occupation * Individualfactors
Crosstab
1.00 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 4.00 4.67

Expected Count .3 1.3 6.6 11.2 5.0 4.6 3.3 1.3 1.0 .3 35.0
% of Total 0.9% 2.8% 7.5% 11.3% 2.8% 3.8% 2.8% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 33.0%
Count 0 1 7 7 4 2 3 1 1 1 27
Expected Count .3 1.0 5.1 8.7 3.8 3.6 2.5 1.0 .8 .3 27.0
% of Total 0.0% 0.9% 6.6% 6.6% 3.8% 1.9% 2.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 25.5%
Count 0 0 2 8 4 4 4 2 1 0 25
Expected Count .2 .9 4.7 8.0 3.5 3.3 2.4 .9 .7 .2 25.0
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 1.9% 7.5% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 1.9% 0.9% 0.0% 23.6%
Count 0 0 3 7 4 4 0 0 1 0 19
Expected Count .2 .7 3.6 6.1 2.7 2.5 1.8 .7 .5 .2 19.0
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 2.8% 6.6% 3.8% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 17.9%
Count 1 4 20 34 15 14 10 4 3 1 106
Expected Count 1.0 4.0 20.0 34.0 15.0 14.0 10.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 106.0
% of Total 0.9% 3.8% 18.9% 32.1% 14.2% 13.2% 9.4% 3.8% 2.8% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
is .18.
Occupation * Healthfactors
Crosstab
Healthfactors Total
1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.33
Expected Count 3.0 6.3 10.6 4.6 5.3 3.3 .7 .7 .7 35.0
% of Total 3.8% 6.6% 12.3% 1.9% 5.7% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.0%
Count 3 6 4 8 1 3 1 1 0 27
Expected Count 2.3 4.8 8.2 3.6 4.1 2.5 .5 .5 .5 27.0
% of Total 2.8% 5.7% 3.8% 7.5% 0.9% 2.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 25.5%
Count 2 4 7 4 2 3 1 1 1 25
Expected Count 2.1 4.5 7.5 3.3 3.8 2.4 .5 .5 .5 25.0
% of Total 1.9% 3.8% 6.6% 3.8% 1.9% 2.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 23.6%
Count 0 2 8 0 7 1 0 0 1 19
Expected Count 1.6 3.4 5.7 2.5 2.9 1.8 .4 .4 .4 19.0
% of Total 0.0% 1.9% 7.5% 0.0% 6.6% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 17.9%
Count 9 19 32 14 16 10 2 2 2 106
Expected Count 9.0 19.0 32.0 14.0 16.0 10.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 106.0
% of Total 8.5% 17.9% 30.2% 13.2% 15.1% 9.4% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

is .36.
Occupation * Employeemotivation
Crosstab
1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.25 3.50
Expected Count 1.0 7.3 6.6 5.3 8.6 2.6 1.3 1.3 1.0 35.0
% of Total 0.9% 8.5% 5.7% 3.8% 8.5% 1.9% 1.9% 0.9% 0.9% 33.0%
Count 2 6 4 3 6 4 1 1 0 27
Expected Count .8 5.6 5.1 4.1 6.6 2.0 1.0 1.0 .8 27.0
% of Total 1.9% 5.7% 3.8% 2.8% 5.7% 3.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 25.5%
Count 0 3 7 4 5 2 1 1 2 25
Expected Count .7 5.2 4.7 3.8 6.1 1.9 .9 .9 .7 25.0
% of Total 0.0% 2.8% 6.6% 3.8% 4.7% 1.9% 0.9% 0.9% 1.9% 23.6%
Count 0 4 3 5 6 0 0 1 0 19
Expected Count .5 3.9 3.6 2.9 4.7 1.4 .7 .7 .5 19.0
% of Total 0.0% 3.8% 2.8% 4.7% 5.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 17.9%
Count 3 22 20 16 26 8 4 4 3 106
Expected Count 3.0 22.0 20.0 16.0 26.0 8.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 106.0
% of Total 2.8% 20.8% 18.9% 15.1% 24.5% 7.5% 3.8% 3.8% 2.8% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

is .54.
Occupation * Organizationsupport
Crosstab
1.00 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00
Expected Count .3 3.0 4.0 9.6 6.9 4.0 4.0 1.3 1.7 .3 35.0
% of Total 0.0% 4.7% 2.8% 8.5% 7.5% 5.7% 2.8% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 33.0%
Count 1 1 2 9 2 2 6 1 2 1 27
Expected Count .3 2.3 3.1 7.4 5.3 3.1 3.1 1.0 1.3 .3 27.0
% of Total 0.9% 0.9% 1.9% 8.5% 1.9% 1.9% 5.7% 0.9% 1.9% 0.9% 25.5%
Count 0 0 5 6 5 4 2 1 2 0 25
Expected Count .2 2.1 2.8 6.8 5.0 2.8 2.8 .9 1.2 .2 25.0
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 4.7% 5.7% 4.7% 3.8% 1.9% 0.9% 1.9% 0.0% 23.6%
Count 0 3 2 5 6 0 1 2 0 0 19
Expected Count .2 1.6 2.2 5.2 3.8 2.2 2.2 .7 .9 .2 19.0
% of Total 0.0% 2.8% 1.9% 4.7% 5.7% 0.0% 0.9% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 17.9%
Count 1 9 12 29 21 12 12 4 5 1 106
Expected Count 1.0 9.0 12.0 29.0 21.0 12.0 12.0 4.0 5.0 1.0 106.0
% of Total 0.9% 8.5% 11.3% 27.4% 19.8% 11.3% 11.3% 3.8% 4.7% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

is .18.
Occupation * Productivityimprovement
Crosstab
1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.40 3.60
Occupation Mason Count 2 3 5 2 4 4 6 4 2 2 0 1 3
Expected Count 1.3 2.3 3.6 4.3 3.6 7.3 5.9 2.6 2.0 1.3 .3 .3 35
% within
50.0% 42.9% 45.5% 15.4% 36.4% 18.2% 33.3% 50.0% 33.3% 50.0% 0.0% 100.0% 33.0%
% of Total 1.9% 2.8% 4.7% 1.9% 3.8% 3.8% 5.7% 3.8% 1.9% 1.9% 0.0% 0.9% 33.0%
Count 1 2 3 5 2 3 5 2 4 0 0 0 2
Expected Count 1.0 1.8 2.8 3.3 2.8 5.6 4.6 2.0 1.5 1.0 .3 .3 27
Mazdoor
% within
25.0% 28.6% 27.3% 38.5% 18.2% 13.6% 27.8% 25.0% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.5%
% of Total 0.9% 1.9% 2.8% 4.7% 1.9% 2.8% 4.7% 1.9% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.5%
Count 0 1 0 3 4 10 4 2 0 1 0 0 2
Expected Count .9 1.7 2.6 3.1 2.6 5.2 4.2 1.9 1.4 .9 .2 .2 25
Laymen
% within
0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 23.1% 36.4% 45.5% 22.2% 25.0% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 23.6%
% of Total 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 2.8% 3.8% 9.4% 3.8% 1.9% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 23.6%
Count 1 1 3 3 1 5 3 0 0 1 1 0 1
Expected Count .7 1.3 2.0 2.3 2.0 3.9 3.2 1.4 1.1 .7 .2 .2 19
Barbender
% within
25.0% 14.3% 27.3% 23.1% 9.1% 22.7% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 100.0% 0.0% 17.9%
% of Total 0.9% 0.9% 2.8% 2.8% 0.9% 4.7% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 17.9%
Count 4 7 11 13 11 22 18 8 6 4 1 1 10
Expected Count 4.0 7.0 11.0 13.0 11.0 22.0 18.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 106
Total
% within
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 3.8% 6.6% 10.4% 12.3% 10.4% 20.8% 17.0% 7.5% 5.7% 3.8% 0.9% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
is .18.
Experience in the field * awkwardandstaticposture
Crosstab
1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00 4.33
Experience in the field <2 years Count 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5

Expected Count .3 1.1 1.4 .6 .4 .7 .3 .0 .1 .0 5.0
% within Experience in the field 0.0% 20.0% 60.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% within
0.0% 4.3% 10.0% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.7%
% of Total 0.0% 0.9% 2.8% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.7%
Count 4 19 23 7 7 11 3 0 1 0 75
Expected Count 5.0 16.3 21.2 9.2 6.4 9.9 4.2 .7 1.4 .7 75.0
2-6 years
% within
57.1% 82.6% 76.7% 53.8% 77.8% 78.6% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 70.8%
% of Total 3.8% 17.9% 21.7% 6.6% 6.6% 10.4% 2.8% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 70.8%
Count 3 1 3 3 2 1 3 1 1 0 18
Expected Count 1.2 3.9 5.1 2.2 1.5 2.4 1.0 .2 .3 .2 18.0
6-10 years
% within
42.9% 4.3% 10.0% 23.1% 22.2% 7.1% 50.0% 100.0% 50.0% 0.0% 17.0%
% of Total 2.8% 0.9% 2.8% 2.8% 1.9% 0.9% 2.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 17.0%
Count 0 2 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 8
Expected Count .5 1.7 2.3 1.0 .7 1.1 .5 .1 .2 .1 8.0
>10 years
% within
0.0% 8.7% 3.3% 15.4% 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 7.5%
% of Total 0.0% 1.9% 0.9% 1.9% 0.0% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 7.5%
Count 7 23 30 13 9 14 6 1 2 1 106
Expected Count 7.0 23.0 30.0 13.0 9.0 14.0 6.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 106.0
Total
% within
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 6.6% 21.7% 28.3% 12.3% 8.5% 13.2% 5.7% 0.9% 1.9% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
is .05.
Experience in the field * repetition
Crosstab
repetition Total
1.00 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00
Count 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 5
Expected Count .0 .4 1.2 1.4 .5 .6 .4 .2 .1 .2 5.0
<2 years % within Experience in the field 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 1.9% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.7%
Count 0 5 22 22 7 7 4 2 2 4 75
Expected Count .7 5.7 18.4 21.2 7.1 8.5 5.7 2.8 2.1 2.8 75.0
2-6 years % within Experience in the field 0.0% 6.7% 29.3% 29.3% 9.3% 9.3% 5.3% 2.7% 2.7% 5.3% 100.0%
% of Total 0.0% 4.7% 20.8% 20.8% 6.6% 6.6% 3.8% 1.9% 1.9% 3.8% 70.8%
Experience in the field
Count 1 3 2 6 1 2 2 1 0 0 18
Expected Count .2 1.4 4.4 5.1 1.7 2.0 1.4 .7 .5 .7 18.0
% of Total 0.9% 2.8% 1.9% 5.7% 0.9% 1.9% 1.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 17.0%
Count 0 0 2 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 8
Expected Count .1 .6 2.0 2.3 .8 .9 .6 .3 .2 .3 8.0
>10 years % within Experience in the field 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 12.5% 0.0% 12.5% 25.0% 12.5% 12.5% 0.0% 100.0%
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 1.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 1.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 7.5%
Count 1 8 26 30 10 12 8 4 3 4 106
Expected Count 1.0 8.0 26.0 30.0 10.0 12.0 8.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 106.0
Total % within Experience in the field 0.9% 7.5% 24.5% 28.3% 9.4% 11.3% 7.5% 3.8% 2.8% 3.8% 100.0%
% of Total 0.9% 7.5% 24.5% 28.3% 9.4% 11.3% 7.5% 3.8% 2.8% 3.8% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
is .05.
Experience in the field * Force
Crosstab
Force Total
1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.67 4.00 4.33
Experience in the field <2 years Count 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 5

Expected Count .3 1.0 1.7 .8 .5 .3 .1 .2 .0 5.0
% within Experience in the field 0.0% 20.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% within Force 0.0% 4.5% 8.1% 0.0% 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.7%
% of Total 0.0% 0.9% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.7%
Count 7 13 30 11 7 5 1 1 0 75
Expected Count 5.0 15.6 26.2 11.3 7.1 5.0 1.4 2.8 .7 75.0
2-6 years % within Experience in the field 9.3% 17.3% 40.0% 14.7% 9.3% 6.7% 1.3% 1.3% 0.0% 100.0%
% within Force 100.0% 59.1% 81.1% 68.8% 70.0% 71.4% 50.0% 25.0% 0.0% 70.8%
% of Total 6.6% 12.3% 28.3% 10.4% 6.6% 4.7% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 70.8%
Count 0 5 3 2 3 1 1 2 1 18
Expected Count 1.2 3.7 6.3 2.7 1.7 1.2 .3 .7 .2 18.0
% within Force 0.0% 22.7% 8.1% 12.5% 30.0% 14.3% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 17.0%
% of Total 0.0% 4.7% 2.8% 1.9% 2.8% 0.9% 0.9% 1.9% 0.9% 17.0%
Count 0 3 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 8
Expected Count .5 1.7 2.8 1.2 .8 .5 .2 .3 .1 8.0
>10 years % within Experience in the field 0.0% 37.5% 12.5% 37.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.5% 0.0% 100.0%
% within Force 0.0% 13.6% 2.7% 18.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% 7.5%
% of Total 0.0% 2.8% 0.9% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 7.5%
Count 7 22 37 16 10 7 2 4 1 106
Expected Count 7.0 22.0 37.0 16.0 10.0 7.0 2.0 4.0 1.0 106.0
Total % within Experience in the field 6.6% 20.8% 34.9% 15.1% 9.4% 6.6% 1.9% 3.8% 0.9% 100.0%
% within Force 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 6.6% 20.8% 34.9% 15.1% 9.4% 6.6% 1.9% 3.8% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
is .05.
Experience in the field * Contactstress
Crosstab
Contactstress Total
1.00 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00 4.67
Experience in the field <2 years Count 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5
Expected Count .0 .0 .9 1.7 .4 .8 .4 .2 .2 .1 .1 5.0
% within Experience in the field 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.7%
Count 0 1 14 27 7 12 7 3 2 2 0 75
Expected Count .7 .7 13.4 25.5 6.4 12.0 6.4 3.5 3.5 1.4 1.4 75.0
2-6 years % within Experience in the field 0.0% 1.3% 18.7% 36.0% 9.3% 16.0% 9.3% 4.0% 2.7% 2.7% 0.0% 100.0%
% of Total 0.0% 0.9% 13.2% 25.5% 6.6% 11.3% 6.6% 2.8% 1.9% 1.9% 0.0% 70.8%
Count 1 0 2 5 1 4 1 1 1 0 2 18
Expected Count .2 .2 3.2 6.1 1.5 2.9 1.5 .8 .8 .3 .3 18.0
% of Total 0.9% 0.0% 1.9% 4.7% 0.9% 3.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 1.9% 17.0%
Count 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 1 2 0 0 8
Expected Count .1 .1 1.4 2.7 .7 1.3 .7 .4 .4 .2 .2 8.0
>10 years % within Experience in the field 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 0.0% 12.5% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 1.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 7.5%
Count 1 1 19 36 9 17 9 5 5 2 2 106
Expected Count 1.0 1.0 19.0 36.0 9.0 17.0 9.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 106.0
Total % within Experience in the field 0.9% 0.9% 17.9% 34.0% 8.5% 16.0% 8.5% 4.7% 4.7% 1.9% 1.9% 100.0%
% of Total 0.9% 0.9% 17.9% 34.0% 8.5% 16.0% 8.5% 4.7% 4.7% 1.9% 1.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

is .05.
Experience in the field * Timeperiod
Crosstab
Timeperiod Total
1.00 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00
Expected Count .0 .5 1.1 1.4 .8 .4 .5 .1 .0 .0 5.0
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 2.8% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.7%
Count 1 7 17 23 13 6 6 1 0 1 75
Expected Count .7 7.8 16.3 20.5 12.0 6.4 7.8 2.1 .7 .7 75.0
% of Total 0.9% 6.6% 16.0% 21.7% 12.3% 5.7% 5.7% 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 70.8%
Count 0 2 2 3 1 3 4 2 1 0 18
Expected Count .2 1.9 3.9 4.9 2.9 1.5 1.9 .5 .2 .2 18.0
% of Total 0.0% 1.9% 1.9% 2.8% 0.9% 2.8% 3.8% 1.9% 0.9% 0.0% 17.0%
Count 0 2 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 8
Expected Count .1 .8 1.7 2.2 1.3 .7 .8 .2 .1 .1 8.0
% of Total 0.0% 1.9% 2.8% 0.0% 1.9% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.5%
Count 1 11 23 29 17 9 11 3 1 1 106
Expected Count 1.0 11.0 23.0 29.0 17.0 9.0 11.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 106.0
% of Total 0.9% 10.4% 21.7% 27.4% 16.0% 8.5% 10.4% 2.8% 0.9% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

is .05.
Experience in the field * Workrelatedfactors
Crosstab
Workrelatedfactors
1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.25 3.50 3.75 4.00 4.50
Expected Count .2 .8 .7 1.3 1.0 .3 .3 .3 .1 .0 .0 .0
% within Workrelatedfactors 0.0% 18.8% 7.1% 3.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% of Total 0.0% 2.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Count 4 8 11 20 14 6 7 3 0 0 1 1
Expected Count 2.8 11.3 9.9 19.1 14.9 4.2 5.0 4.2 1.4 .7 .7 .7
% of Total 3.8% 7.5% 10.4% 18.9% 13.2% 5.7% 6.6% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.9%
Count 0 2 2 6 5 0 0 1 1 1 0 0
Expected Count .7 2.7 2.4 4.6 3.6 1.0 1.2 1.0 .3 .2 .2 .2
% of Total 0.0% 1.9% 1.9% 5.7% 4.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0%
Count 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0
Expected Count .3 1.2 1.1 2.0 1.6 .5 .5 .5 .2 .1 .1 .1
% of Total 0.0% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 1.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Count 4 16 14 27 21 6 7 6 2 1 1 1
Expected Count 4.0 16.0 14.0 27.0 21.0 6.0 7.0 6.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
% of Total 3.8% 15.1% 13.2% 25.5% 19.8% 5.7% 6.6% 5.7% 1.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

a. 44 cells (91.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
.05.
Experience in the field * Environmentalriskfactors
Crosstab
1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00 4.33
Expected Count .5 .9 1.7 .4 .5 .5 .3 .0 .0 .0 5.0
% within Environmentalriskfactors 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% 0.0% 10.0% 27.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.7%
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.7%
Count 8 15 29 6 5 6 4 0 1 1 75
Expected Count 7.1 14.2 26.2 6.4 7.1 7.8 4.2 .7 .7 .7 75.0
% of Total 7.5% 14.2% 27.4% 5.7% 4.7% 5.7% 3.8% 0.0% 0.9% 0.9% 70.8%
Count 1 3 5 2 3 2 1 1 0 0 18
Expected Count 1.7 3.4 6.3 1.5 1.7 1.9 1.0 .2 .2 .2 18.0
% of Total 0.9% 2.8% 4.7% 1.9% 2.8% 1.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 17.0%
Count 1 2 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 8
Expected Count .8 1.5 2.8 .7 .8 .8 .5 .1 .1 .1 8.0
% of Total 0.9% 1.9% 1.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.5%
Count 10 20 37 9 10 11 6 1 1 1 106
Expected Count 10.0 20.0 37.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 6.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 106.0
% of Total 9.4% 18.9% 34.9% 8.5% 9.4% 10.4% 5.7% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

.05.
Experience in the field * Individualfactors
Crosstab
1.00 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 4.00 4.67
Expected Count .0 .2 .9 1.6 .7 .7 .5 .2 .1 .0 5.0
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.8% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.7%
Count 1 3 15 21 10 10 8 3 3 1 75
Expected Count .7 2.8 14.2 24.1 10.6 9.9 7.1 2.8 2.1 .7 75.0
% of Total 0.9% 2.8% 14.2% 19.8% 9.4% 9.4% 7.5% 2.8% 2.8% 0.9% 70.8%
Count 0 1 4 7 3 1 1 1 0 0 18
Expected Count .2 .7 3.4 5.8 2.5 2.4 1.7 .7 .5 .2 18.0
% of Total 0.0% 0.9% 3.8% 6.6% 2.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 17.0%
Count 0 0 1 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 8
Expected Count .1 .3 1.5 2.6 1.1 1.1 .8 .3 .2 .1 8.0
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.5%
Count 1 4 20 34 15 14 10 4 3 1 106
Expected Count 1.0 4.0 20.0 34.0 15.0 14.0 10.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 106.0
% of Total 0.9% 3.8% 18.9% 32.1% 14.2% 13.2% 9.4% 3.8% 2.8% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

.05.
Experience in the field * Healthfactors
Crosstab
Healthfactors Total
1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.33
Expected Count .4 .9 1.5 .7 .8 .5 .1 .1 .1 5.0
% of Total 1.9% 0.0% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.7%
Count 2 13 23 12 10 9 2 2 2 75
Expected Count 6.4 13.4 22.6 9.9 11.3 7.1 1.4 1.4 1.4 75.0
% of Total 1.9% 12.3% 21.7% 11.3% 9.4% 8.5% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 70.8%
Count 2 5 5 1 4 1 0 0 0 18
Expected Count 1.5 3.2 5.4 2.4 2.7 1.7 .3 .3 .3 18.0
% of Total 1.9% 4.7% 4.7% 0.9% 3.8% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 17.0%
Count 3 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 8
Expected Count .7 1.4 2.4 1.1 1.2 .8 .2 .2 .2 8.0
% of Total 2.8% 0.9% 2.8% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.5%
Count 9 19 32 14 16 10 2 2 2 106
Expected Count 9.0 19.0 32.0 14.0 16.0 10.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 106.0
% of Total 8.5% 17.9% 30.2% 13.2% 15.1% 9.4% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

.09.
Experience in the field * Employeemotivation
Crosstab
1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.25 3.50
Expected Count .1 1.0 .9 .8 1.2 .4 .2 .2 .1 5.0
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 1.9% 0.9% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.7%
Count 3 15 13 12 18 7 3 2 2 75
Expected Count 2.1 15.6 14.2 11.3 18.4 5.7 2.8 2.8 2.1 75.0
% of Total 2.8% 14.2% 12.3% 11.3% 17.0% 6.6% 2.8% 1.9% 1.9% 70.8%
Count 0 4 3 3 4 1 0 2 1 18
Expected Count .5 3.7 3.4 2.7 4.4 1.4 .7 .7 .5 18.0
% of Total 0.0% 3.8% 2.8% 2.8% 3.8% 0.9% 0.0% 1.9% 0.9% 17.0%
Count 0 3 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 8
Expected Count .2 1.7 1.5 1.2 2.0 .6 .3 .3 .2 8.0
% of Total 0.0% 2.8% 1.9% 0.0% 1.9% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 7.5%
Count 3 22 20 16 26 8 4 4 3 106
Expected Count 3.0 22.0 20.0 16.0 26.0 8.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 106.0
% of Total 2.8% 20.8% 18.9% 15.1% 24.5% 7.5% 3.8% 3.8% 2.8% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

.14.
Experience in the field * Organizationsupport
Crosstab
1.00 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00
Expected Count .0 .4 .6 1.4 1.0 .6 .6 .2 .2 .0 5.0
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.9% 0.0% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.7%
Count 1 6 9 23 13 9 7 4 2 1 75
Expected Count .7 6.4 8.5 20.5 14.9 8.5 8.5 2.8 3.5 .7 75.0
% of Total 0.9% 5.7% 8.5% 21.7% 12.3% 8.5% 6.6% 3.8% 1.9% 0.9% 70.8%
Count 0 2 3 2 6 1 1 0 3 0 18
Expected Count .2 1.5 2.0 4.9 3.6 2.0 2.0 .7 .8 .2 18.0
% of Total 0.0% 1.9% 2.8% 1.9% 5.7% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 2.8% 0.0% 17.0%
Count 0 1 0 4 0 2 1 0 0 0 8
Expected Count .1 .7 .9 2.2 1.6 .9 .9 .3 .4 .1 8.0
% of Total 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 3.8% 0.0% 1.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.5%
Count 1 9 12 29 21 12 12 4 5 1 106
Expected Count 1.0 9.0 12.0 29.0 21.0 12.0 12.0 4.0 5.0 1.0 106.0
% of Total 0.9% 8.5% 11.3% 27.4% 19.8% 11.3% 11.3% 3.8% 4.7% 0.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

.05.
Experience in the field * Productivityimprovement
Crosstab
1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.40 3.60
Expected Count .2 .3 .5 .6 .5 1.0 .8 .4 .3 .2 .0 .0
% within Productivityimprovement 0.0% 0.0% 18.2% 0.0% 18.2% 0.0% 5.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 1.9% 0.0% 1.9% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Count 2 5 6 10 5 18 14 5 5 3 1 1
Expected Count 2.8 5.0 7.8 9.2 7.8 15.6 12.7 5.7 4.2 2.8 .7 .7
% of Total 1.9% 4.7% 5.7% 9.4% 4.7% 17.0% 13.2% 4.7% 4.7% 2.8% 0.9% 0.9%
Count 0 1 2 3 3 2 3 2 1 1 0 0
Expected Count .7 1.2 1.9 2.2 1.9 3.7 3.1 1.4 1.0 .7 .2 .2
% of Total 0.0% 0.9% 1.9% 2.8% 2.8% 1.9% 2.8% 1.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0%
Count 2 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0
Expected Count .3 .5 .8 1.0 .8 1.7 1.4 .6 .5 .3 .1 .1
% of Total 1.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 1.9% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Count 4 7 11 13 11 22 18 8 6 4 1 1
Expected Count 4.0 7.0 11.0 13.0 11.0 22.0 18.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 1.0 1.0
% of Total 3.8% 6.6% 10.4% 12.3% 10.4% 20.8% 17.0% 7.5% 5.7% 3.8% 0.9% 0.9%
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

.05.
Oneway
Notes

Comments
Data
a.sav
Input Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
treated as missing.
Statistics for each analysis are
Missing Value Handling
based on cases with no missing
Cases Used
data for any variable in the
analysis.
ONEWAY
repetition Force Contactstress
Timeperiod Workrelatedfactors
Syntax Employeemotivation
Organizationsupport BY
/PLOT MEANS
/MISSING ANALYSIS
/POSTHOC=DUNCAN
WALLER(100) ALPHA(0.05).
Resources Processor Time 00:00:01.50
Warnings
Post hoc tests are not performed for awkwardandstaticposture because at

least one group has fewer than two cases.
Post hoc tests are not performed for repetition because at least one group has
fewer than two cases.
Post hoc tests are not performed for Force because at least one group has
fewer than two cases.
Post hoc tests are not performed for Contactstress because at least one group
has fewer than two cases.
Post hoc tests are not performed for Timeperiod because at least one group
Post hoc tests are not performed for Workrelatedfactors because at least one
group has fewer than two cases.
Post hoc tests are not performed for Environmentalriskfactors because at least
one group has fewer than two cases.
Post hoc tests are not performed for Individualfactors because at least one
Post hoc tests are not performed for Healthfactors because at least one group
Post hoc tests are not performed for Employeemotivation because at least one
Post hoc tests are not performed for Organizationsupport because at least one
ANOVA
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 6.306 11 .573 1.407 .183
awkwardandstaticposture Within Groups 38.298 94 .407
Total 44.604 105

Between Groups 6.426 11 .584 1.306 .234
repetition
Within Groups 42.060 94 .447
Total 48.486 105
Between Groups 4.160 11 .378 .946 .501
Force Within Groups 37.589 94 .400
Total 41.748 105
Between Groups 6.160 11 .560 1.167 .320
Contactstress Within Groups 45.107 94 .480
Total 51.267 105
Between Groups 3.478 11 .316 .928 .517
Timeperiod Within Groups 32.029 94 .341
Total 35.506 105
Between Groups 4.490 11 .408 1.406 .183
Workrelatedfactors Within Groups 27.290 94 .290
Total 31.781 105
Between Groups 8.360 11 .760 2.143 .024
Environmentalriskfactors Within Groups 33.346 94 .355
Total 41.706 105
Between Groups 6.275 11 .570 1.513 .140
Individualfactors Within Groups 35.440 94 .377
Total 41.715 105
Between Groups 5.819 11 .529 1.477 .153
Healthfactors Within Groups 33.675 94 .358
Total 39.494 105
Between Groups 2.404 11 .219 1.002 .451
Employeemotivation Within Groups 20.511 94 .218
Total 22.915 105
Between Groups 6.414 11 .583 1.560 .124
Organizationsupport Within Groups 35.126 94 .374
Total 41.540 105
Means Plots

Output

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Output

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Frequencies

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Total Variance Explained

Output Created 28-FEB-2019 12:10:24

N 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Output Created 28-FEB-2019 12:13:02

Elapsed Time 00:00:09.42

Cells Available 174762

Case Processing Summary

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Gender Male Count 5 14 25 11 8 7 6 1 2 1 80

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

Gender Male Count 1 8 18 23 7 10 5 4 3 1 80

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

Pearson Chi-Square 12.564a 9 .183

1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.67 4.00 4.33

Gender Male Count 4 16 29 10 9 5 2 4 1 80

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

Pearson Chi-Square 6.460a 8 .596

Gender Male Count 1 1 13 28 6 14 4 4 5 2 2 80

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

Pearson Chi-Square 9.736a 10 .464

Gender Male Count 0 8 18 20 13 8 8 3 1 1 80

Expected Count .2 2.7 5.6 7.1 4.2 2.2 2.7 .7 .2 .2 26.0

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

Pearson Chi-Square 6.436a 9 .696

Gender Male Count 3 13 8 22 15 5 4 5 2 1 1 1 80

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

Pearson Chi-Square 6.838a 11 .812

Gender Male Count 9 14 27 8 7 8 4 1 1 1 80

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

Gender Male Count 1 3 13 27 12 12 7 3 2 0 80

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

Pearson Chi-Square 6.120a 9 .728

1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.33

Gender Male Count 6 13 29 6 15 7 1 1 2 80

Expected Count 2.2 4.7 7.8 3.4 3.9 2.5 .5 .5 .5 26.0

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

Pearson Chi-Square 18.002a 8 .021

1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.25 3.50

Gender Male Count 1 16 16 13 20 5 3 3 3 80

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

Pearson Chi-Square 5.210a 8 .735

Gender Male Count 0 8 10 21 19 10 6 3 3 0 80

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

Pearson Chi-Square 15.384a 9 .081

Gender Male Count 3 5 8 8 10 19 13 6 2 4 1 1 80

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

Age Group <30 years Count 2 8 13 3 2 7 1 0 0 0 36

Expected Count .9 2.8 3.7 1.6 1.1 1.7 .7 .1 .2 .1 13.0

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

Pearson Chi-Square 28.629a 18 .053

Age Group <30 years Count 0 1 8 12 6 4 2 0 0 3 36

Expected Count .1 1.0 3.2 3.7 1.2 1.5 1.0 .5 .4 .5 13.0

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.67 4.00 4.33

Age Group <30 years Count 2 8 14 8 1 3 0 0 0 36

Expected Count .9 2.7 4.5 2.0 1.2 .9 .2 .5 .1 13.0

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

Age Group <30 years Count 0 0 5 17 3 5 4 2 0 0 0 36

Expected Count .1 .1 2.3 4.4 1.1 2.1 1.1 .6 .6 .2 .2 13.0