You are on page 1of 28

Mainstreet Research Survey of Voting Intentions in Scarborough North

About Mainstreet

With 20 years of political experience in all three levels of government, President and CEO
Quito Maggi is a respected commentator on international public affairs.
Differentiated by its large sample sizes, Mainstreet Research has provided accurate snap-
shots of public opinion, having predicted a majority NDP government in Alberta, and was
the only polling firm to correctly predict a Liberal majority government in the 2015 federal
election. Mainstreet also accurately predicted the Miami & New York City Mayoral elections,
and the Alabama special election in 2017. Mainstreet Research is a member of the World
Association for Public Opinion Research and meets international and Canadian publication
standards.

Methodology

The analysis in this report is based on results of a survey conducted on December 19th-21st
2018 among a sample of 592 adults, 18 years of age or older, living in Scarborough North.
The survey was conducted using live agents. Respondents were interviews on landlines and
cellular phones. The survey is intended to represent the voting population in Scarborough
North.
The margin of error for the poll is +/- 4.03% at the 95% confidence level. Margins of error
are higher in each subsample.
Totals may not add up 100% due to rounding.

1
As you might have heard, Premier Doug Ford is in the process of repeal-
ing the sex ed curriculum instituted by Kathleen Wynne. The provincial
government has been consulting Ontario parents as to what should re-
place it. Do you support the Ford government’s effort to repeal and re-
place the sex ed curriculum that was put in place by the previous Liberal
government?

14 %

43 %

42 %

Response Yes No Not Sure

crosstabbed by age, gender, and children in the household

Gender Age Have Children?


Total Male Female 18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Yes No
Yes 43.5% 46% 41.1% 43.7% 44.7% 53.8% 25.9% 37.4% 46.8%
No 42.5% 41.5% 43.3% 49.5% 39.7% 31.5% 52.6% 51.6% 37.5%
Not Sure 14.1% 12.5% 15.5% 6.8% 15.6% 14.7% 21.6% 11.1% 15.7%
Unweighted Frequency 592 268 324 32 76 204 280 112 480
Weighted Frequency 592 241 264 132 161 125 86 177 327

2
crosstabbed by party support

Party
Total PC NDP Liberals Green Other UD
Yes 43.5% 69.7% 26.2% 24.8% 9.4% 18% 49%
No 42.5% 16.4% 66.6% 66.5% 70.7% 21.2% 22.4%
Not Sure 14.1% 13.9% 7.1% 8.7% 20% 60.8% 28.6%
Unweighted Frequency 592 216 98 180 22 26 50
Weighted Frequency 592 192 92 141 20 14 44

crosstabbed by language

Language
Total English Cantonese Mandarin
Yes 43.5% 43% 37.8% 67.5%
No 42.5% 43.2% 48.4% 8.9%
Not Sure 14.1% 13.8% 13.7% 23.6%
Unweighted Frequency 592 530 34 28
Weighted Frequency 592 467 22 15

3
Did you or someone in your household participate in any way in the con-
sultation process for replacing the sex ed curriculum, either by attend-
ing a meeting, by participating in a telephone townhall, or by completing
an online survey?

7%
8%

13 %

72 %

Attended A Meeting In Person Participated In A Telephone Townhall


Response
Participated In An Online Survey Did Not Participate/Can't Remember

crosstabbed by age, gender, and children in the household

Gender Age Have Children?


Total Male Female 18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Yes No
Attended A Meeting In Person 6.9% 7.8% 6.1% 6.8% 10.3% 6.6% 1.3% 10.9% 4.7%
Participated In A Telephone Townhall 8.4% 7.4% 9.3% 12.6% 8.2% 6.9% 4.8% 17.5% 3.5%
Participated In An Online Survey 12.6% 9.3% 15.6% 26.1% 7.8% 10.9% 3.4% 6.5% 15.9%
Did Not Participate/Can’t Remember 72% 75.4% 68.9% 54.5% 73.8% 75.6% 90.5% 65% 75.8%
Unweighted Frequency 592 268 324 32 76 204 280 112 480
Weighted Frequency 592 241 264 132 161 125 86 177 327

4
crosstabbed by party support

Party
Total PC NDP Liberals Green Other UD
Attended A Meeting In Person 6.9% 8.9% 10.5% 5.7% 0% 0% 0%
Participated In A Telephone Townhall 8.4% 3.9% 10.2% 17.7% 2.8% 0% 0%
Participated In An Online Survey 12.6% 14.8% 10.3% 13.8% 13.1% 7.8% 5.9%
Did Not Participate/Can’t Remember 72% 72.4% 69% 62.8% 84.1% 92.2% 94.1%
Unweighted Frequency 592 216 98 180 22 26 50
Weighted Frequency 592 192 92 141 20 14 44

crosstabbed by language

Language
Total English Cantonese Mandarin
Attended A Meeting In Person 6.9% 7.1% 5.8% 3.8%
Participated In A Telephone Townhall 8.4% 9% 2.5% 0%
Participated In An Online Survey 12.6% 13.3% 7.5% 0%
Did Not Participate/Can’t Remember 72% 70.7% 84.2% 96.2%
Unweighted Frequency 592 530 34 28
Weighted Frequency 592 467 22 15

5
Which statement comes closer to your views, even if neither is exactly
right?

37 % 36 %

27 %

A man or a woman is determined by the sex they were assigned at birth

Response Someone can be a man or a woman even if that is different from the sex they were assigned at birth

Not Sure

crosstabbed by age, gender, and children in the household

Gender Age Have Children?


Total Male Female 18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Yes No
A man or a woman is determined by the sex they were assigned at birth 36.4% 37.4% 35.4% 37.8% 31.6% 47.8% 26.4% 28.8% 40.5%
Someone can be a man or a woman even if that is different from the sex they were assigned at birth 27.1% 22.2% 31.5% 25.2% 31.9% 19.6% 31.8% 30.2% 25.4%
Not Sure 36.5% 40.4% 33% 36.9% 36.5% 32.6% 41.8% 41% 34.1%
Unweighted Frequency 592 268 324 32 76 204 280 112 480
Weighted Frequency 592 241 264 132 161 125 86 177 327

crosstabbed by party support

Party
Total PC NDP Liberals Green Other UD
A man or a woman is determined by the sex they were assigned at birth 36.4% 52.1% 20.4% 24.3% 0% 21.3% 61.5%
Someone can be a man or a woman even if that is different from the sex they were assigned at birth 27.1% 12.5% 58.7% 33.2% 39.4% 16.8% 2.5%
Not Sure 36.5% 35.4% 20.8% 42.6% 60.6% 62% 35.9%
Unweighted Frequency 592 216 98 180 22 26 50
Weighted Frequency 592 192 92 141 20 14 44

6
crosstabbed by language

Language
Total English Cantonese Mandarin
A man or a woman is determined by the sex they were assigned at birth 36.4% 35.3% 29.2% 80.2%
Someone can be a man or a woman even if that is different from the sex they were assigned at birth 27.1% 26.4% 48.8% 15.4%
Not Sure 36.5% 38.3% 22% 4.4%
Unweighted Frequency 592 530 34 28
Weighted Frequency 592 467 22 15

7
The previous sex ed curriculum included lessons that taught “Gender
Identity Theory,” that is, that there are many genders other than “male”
and “female”. Do you agree or disagree with teaching this to children
in Ontario schools?

14 %
22 %

34 % 18 %

11 %

Strongly agree Somewhat agree Somewhat disagree


Response
Strongly disagree Not Sure

crosstabbed by age, gender, and children in the household

Gender Age Have Children?


Total Male Female 18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Yes No
Strongly agree 22.4% 22.9% 22% 18.5% 23.8% 21.4% 27.4% 33.3% 16.5%
Somewhat agree 18% 20% 16.1% 17.6% 18.8% 15.7% 20.3% 10.2% 22.1%
Somewhat disagree 11% 11.9% 10.2% 5.9% 16% 11.8% 8.5% 11.1% 11%
Strongly disagree 34.2% 32.5% 35.8% 44.6% 23.4% 40.5% 29.4% 28.9% 37.1%
Not Sure 14.4% 12.7% 15.9% 13.5% 18.1% 10.6% 14.4% 16.5% 13.3%
Unweighted Frequency 592 268 324 32 76 204 280 112 480
Weighted Frequency 592 241 264 132 161 125 86 177 327

8
crosstabbed by party support

Party
Total PC NDP Liberals Green Other UD
Strongly agree 22.4% 16% 45% 18.5% 32.4% 7.8% 15.9%
Somewhat agree 18% 10.1% 28.5% 26.3% 8.5% 13.5% 9.1%
Somewhat disagree 11% 11.6% 9% 15% 6.5% 7.8% 2.9%
Strongly disagree 34.2% 54.5% 9.5% 19.6% 32.6% 26.4% 47.5%
Not Sure 14.4% 7.7% 8.1% 20.5% 20% 44.6% 24.6%
Unweighted Frequency 592 216 98 180 22 26 50
Weighted Frequency 592 192 92 141 20 14 44

crosstabbed by language

Language
Total English Cantonese Mandarin
Strongly agree 22.4% 23.1% 16.2% 8.9%
Somewhat agree 18% 16.7% 48.1% 11.5%
Somewhat disagree 11% 11.2% 5.8% 11.5%
Strongly disagree 34.2% 34% 19.5% 63.7%
Not Sure 14.4% 14.9% 10.4% 4.4%
Unweighted Frequency 592 530 34 28
Weighted Frequency 592 467 22 15

9
The Ford government has announced that it has halted the Ontario cap-
and-trade carbon tax program. Do you agree or disagree with this deci-
sion?

20 %
25 %

14 %
31 %

9%

Strongly agree Somewhat agree Somewhat disagree


Response
Strongly disagree Not Sure

crosstabbed by age, gender, and children in the household

Gender Age Have Children?


Total Male Female 18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Yes No
Strongly agree 25.5% 35.9% 16% 18.5% 25.1% 39.4% 16.7% 18.7% 29.2%
Somewhat agree 14.5% 17.9% 11.4% 17.6% 16.4% 9.7% 13.3% 17.3% 13%
Somewhat disagree 8.9% 5.9% 11.7% 0% 13.5% 10% 12.3% 9.2% 8.7%
Strongly disagree 31.4% 26.7% 35.7% 32% 31.6% 26.6% 37% 36.5% 28.6%
Not Sure 19.8% 13.7% 25.3% 32% 13.5% 14.3% 20.6% 18.3% 20.5%
Unweighted Frequency 592 268 324 32 76 204 280 112 480
Weighted Frequency 592 241 264 132 161 125 86 177 327

10
crosstabbed by party support

Party
Total PC NDP Liberals Green Other UD
Strongly agree 25.5% 46.2% 4.6% 4% 22.8% 7.8% 54.8%
Somewhat agree 14.5% 18.1% 14% 12.7% 25.9% 3.9% 4%
Somewhat disagree 8.9% 2.3% 19.3% 10.5% 13.1% 36.2% 0%
Strongly disagree 31.4% 11.1% 47.7% 53.1% 15% 43.1% 19.5%
Not Sure 19.8% 22.3% 14.5% 19.7% 23.2% 9% 21.7%
Unweighted Frequency 592 216 98 180 22 26 50
Weighted Frequency 592 192 92 141 20 14 44

crosstabbed by language

Language
Total English Cantonese Mandarin
Strongly agree 25.5% 25% 24.5% 43.3%
Somewhat agree 14.5% 14.7% 10% 15.3%
Somewhat disagree 8.9% 8.9% 11.2% 4.4%
Strongly disagree 31.4% 31.9% 40.2% 0%
Not Sure 19.8% 19.5% 14.1% 36.9%
Unweighted Frequency 592 530 34 28
Weighted Frequency 592 467 22 15

11
Now that Ontario has no cap and trade policy and no carbon tax, Prime
Minister Justin Trudeau has said that the federal carbon tax program
will now apply to Ontario.

Do you support or oppose Justin Trudeau’s plan to introduce a new


federal carbon tax in Ontario?

11 %

33 %

38 %

10 %
8%

Strongly support Somewhat support Somewhat oppose


Response
Strongly oppose Not Sure

12
crosstabbed by age, gender, and children in the household

Gender Age Have Children?


Total Male Female 18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Yes No
Strongly support 32.7% 37.4% 28.4% 24.3% 39% 27.4% 41.6% 35.3% 31.3%
Somewhat support 10.4% 8% 12.6% 0% 13.5% 15.8% 12.8% 9.3% 11%
Somewhat oppose 8% 6.4% 9.4% 0% 10.6% 10.9% 10.8% 8.6% 7.6%
Strongly oppose 37.8% 41% 34.9% 56.3% 31.6% 38.9% 19.5% 41.3% 35.9%
Not Sure 11.1% 7.2% 14.7% 19.4% 5.3% 7% 15.3% 5.6% 14.1%
Unweighted Frequency 592 268 324 32 76 204 280 112 480
Weighted Frequency 592 241 264 132 161 125 86 177 327

crosstabbed by party support

Party
Total PC NDP Liberals Green Other UD
Strongly support 32.7% 9.5% 43.9% 57.4% 52.4% 42.5% 18.8%
Somewhat support 10.4% 6.4% 18.8% 9.2% 12.2% 36.2% 5.1%
Somewhat oppose 8% 10.3% 2.6% 6.9% 20% 0% 9.3%
Strongly oppose 37.8% 65.6% 18% 14.3% 12.2% 8.4% 55%
Not Sure 11.1% 8.2% 16.7% 12.2% 3.3% 12.9% 11.8%
Unweighted Frequency 592 216 98 180 22 26 50
Weighted Frequency 592 192 92 141 20 14 44

13
crosstabbed by language

Language
Total English Cantonese Mandarin
Strongly support 32.7% 33% 45.2% 3.8%
Somewhat support 10.4% 10.6% 7.9% 7.7%
Somewhat oppose 8% 6.3% 13.7% 51%
Strongly oppose 37.8% 39.1% 24.5% 17.7%
Not Sure 11.1% 11% 8.7% 19.8%
Unweighted Frequency 592 530 34 28
Weighted Frequency 592 467 22 15

14
It is now legal to consume cannabis in Canada. Today, the legal age to
or sell or consume cannabis products is 19 in Ontario, while the Quebec
government has introduced a law to restrict cannabis to those aged 21
or over in that province.

Which statement comes closer to your views, even if neither is exactly


right?

18 %
22 %

61 %

The legal age should be 19

Response The legal age should be raised to 21

Not Sure

crosstabbed by age, gender, and children in the household

Gender Age Have Children?


Total Male Female 18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Yes No
The legal age should be 19 21.6% 31.7% 12.4% 23.4% 28.7% 13.5% 17.4% 22% 21.4%
The legal age should be raised to 21 60.9% 52.4% 68.6% 64% 50.4% 70.6% 61.6% 59.4% 61.6%
Not Sure 17.5% 15.9% 19% 12.6% 20.9% 16% 21% 18.6% 16.9%
Unweighted Frequency 592 268 324 32 76 204 280 112 480
Weighted Frequency 592 241 264 132 161 125 86 177 327

15
crosstabbed by party support

Party
Total PC NDP Liberals Green Other UD
The legal age should be 19 21.6% 19.6% 29.9% 24.9% 28.7% 7.8% 4%
The legal age should be raised to 21 60.9% 64.5% 52.5% 63.9% 41.5% 43.7% 67.2%
Not Sure 17.5% 16% 17.5% 11.2% 29.8% 48.5% 28.8%
Unweighted Frequency 592 216 98 180 22 26 50
Weighted Frequency 592 192 92 141 20 14 44

crosstabbed by language

Language
Total English Cantonese Mandarin
The legal age should be 19 21.6% 21.3% 39.4% 3.8%
The legal age should be raised to 21 60.9% 60.7% 49.4% 84.7%
Not Sure 17.5% 18% 11.2% 11.5%
Unweighted Frequency 592 530 34 28
Weighted Frequency 592 467 22 15

16
The Government of Ontario recently announced that Ron Taverner will
become the Head of the Ontario Provincial Police . There has been
a controversy with this appointment because Taverner is a personal
friend of Premier Doug Ford, and because, part way through the hir-
ing process, the job description was changed so that Taverner would
become eligible for the job.

Which statement comes closer to your views, even if neither is exactly


right?

25 % 22 %

54 %

Ford should be able to appoint anyone

Response There has been too much controversy and the process should start over

Not Sure

17
crosstabbed by age, gender, and children in the household

Gender Age Have Children?


Total Male Female 18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Yes No
Ford should be able to appoint anyone 21.7% 28.2% 15.6% 17.6% 29.1% 22.2% 13.3% 21.8% 21.6%
There has been too much controversy and the process should start over 53.6% 44.2% 62.1% 44.6% 50.8% 58.9% 64.8% 51.8% 54.5%
Not Sure 24.8% 27.5% 22.3% 37.8% 20.2% 19% 21.9% 26.5% 23.9%
Unweighted Frequency 592 268 324 32 76 204 280 112 480
Weighted Frequency 592 241 264 132 161 125 86 177 327

crosstabbed by party support

Party
Total PC NDP Liberals Green Other UD
Ford should be able to appoint anyone 21.7% 38.8% 8.3% 8.8% 0% 39.5% 20.4%
There has been too much controversy and the process should start over 53.6% 33.8% 85.4% 65.3% 67.4% 47.6% 31.1%
Not Sure 24.8% 27.4% 6.3% 26% 32.6% 12.9% 48.5%
Unweighted Frequency 592 216 98 180 22 26 50
Weighted Frequency 592 192 92 141 20 14 44

crosstabbed by language

Language
Total English Cantonese Mandarin
Ford should be able to appoint anyone 21.7% 21.7% 18.7% 24.8%
There has been too much controversy and the process should start over 53.6% 52.9% 62.2% 59.9%
Not Sure 24.8% 25.4% 19.1% 15.3%
Unweighted Frequency 592 530 34 28
Weighted Frequency 592 467 22 15

18
If a provincial election were held today, which party would you vote for?
(all voters)

18 %

2% 35 %
4%
All Voters

24 %

17 %

Progressive Conservatives, Doug Ford NDP, Andrea Horwath

Response Liberals, John Fraser Greens, Mike Schreiner

Another Party Undecided

crosstabbed by age, gender, and children in the household

Gender Age Have Children?


Total Male Female 18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Yes No
Progressive Conservatives, Doug Ford 35.5% 42.7% 28.8% 36.9% 33.6% 41% 28.6% 33.9% 36.3%
NDP, Andrea Horwath 17% 17.8% 16.3% 12.6% 26.2% 9.6% 17.3% 21.4% 14.7%
Liberals, John Fraser 24% 20.3% 27.3% 25.2% 15.6% 26.9% 33.5% 23% 24.5%
Greens, Mike Schreiner 3.8% 4.5% 3.2% 0% 7.8% 4% 2% 5.9% 2.7%
Another Party 2% 0.7% 3.2% 0% 2.9% 2.1% 3.5% 3.3% 1.3%
Undecided 17.7% 13.9% 21.2% 25.2% 13.9% 16.5% 15.2% 12.5% 20.5%
Unweighted Frequency 592 268 324 32 76 204 280 112 480
Weighted Frequency 592 241 264 132 161 125 86 177 327

19
crosstabbed by party support

Party
Total PC NDP Liberals Green Other UD
Progressive Conservatives, Doug Ford 35.5% 93.2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
NDP, Andrea Horwath 17% 0% 92.9% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Liberals, John Fraser 24% 0% 0% 85.5% 0% 0% 0%
Greens, Mike Schreiner 3.8% 0% 0% 0% 96.7% 0% 0%
Another Party 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 70.4% 0%
Undecided 17.7% 6.8% 7.1% 14.5% 3.3% 29.6% 100%
Unweighted Frequency 592 216 98 180 22 26 50
Weighted Frequency 592 192 92 141 20 14 44

crosstabbed by language

Language
Total English Cantonese Mandarin
Progressive Conservatives, Doug Ford 35.5% 34.2% 32.1% 80.8%
NDP, Andrea Horwath 17% 17.9% 5.4% 7.7%
Liberals, John Fraser 24% 23.5% 48.8% 0%
Greens, Mike Schreiner 3.8% 4.1% 0% 0%
Another Party 2% 2.2% 0% 0%
Undecided 17.7% 18.1% 13.7% 11.5%
Unweighted Frequency 592 530 34 28
Weighted Frequency 592 467 22 15

20
If a provincial election were held today, which party would you vote for?
(decided and leaning voters)

4% 3%

42 %
31 %
All Voters

20 %

Progressive Conservatives, Doug Ford NDP, Andrea Horwath

Response Liberals, John Fraser Greens, Mike Schreiner

Another Party

crosstabbed by age, gender, and children in the household

Gender Age Have Children?


Total Male Female 18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Yes No
Progressive Conservatives, Doug Ford 41.8% 48% 36.2% 50% 35.5% 47.3% 33.2% 35.7% 45.3%
NDP, Andrea Horwath 19.9% 19.2% 20.6% 14.5% 30.7% 11.7% 19.7% 24.9% 17%
Liberals, John Fraser 30.9% 26.5% 34.9% 35.5% 22.5% 32% 38% 29.8% 31.5%
Greens, Mike Schreiner 4.2% 4.7% 3.8% 0% 8.2% 4.5% 2.9% 6.1% 3.2%
Another Party 3.1% 1.5% 4.6% 0% 3% 4.5% 6.1% 3.5% 2.9%
Unweighted Frequency 542 248 294 28 72 184 258 104 438
Weighted Frequency 542 220 241 121 148 115 79 167 294

21
crosstabbed by party support

Party
Total PC NDP Liberals Green Other
Progressive Conservatives, Doug Ford 41.8% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0%
NDP, Andrea Horwath 19.9% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0%
Liberals, John Fraser 30.9% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0%
Greens, Mike Schreiner 4.2% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0%
Another Party 3.1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
Unweighted Frequency 542 216 98 180 22 26
Weighted Frequency 542 193 92 143 20 14

crosstabbed by language

Language
Total English Cantonese Mandarin
Progressive Conservatives, Doug Ford 41.8% 40.4% 35.5% 92.2%
NDP, Andrea Horwath 19.9% 20.8% 9.1% 7.8%
Liberals, John Fraser 30.9% 30.8% 55.4% 0%
Greens, Mike Schreiner 4.2% 4.6% 0% 0%
Another Party 3.1% 3.4% 0% 0%
Unweighted Frequency 592 530 34 28
Weighted Frequency 592 467 22 15

22
Do you have a favourable or unfavourable opinion of Doug Ford?

13 %

7%
39 %

42 %

Favourable Unfavourable

Response Not familiar with Doug Ford Not Sure

crosstabbed by age, gender, and children in the household

Gender Age Have Children?


Total Male Female 18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Yes No
Favourable 38.5% 50% 28.1% 42.8% 36.1% 44.4% 27.8% 38.1% 38.7%
Unfavourable 41.8% 34.9% 48.1% 32% 47.9% 35.3% 54.8% 41.5% 41.9%
Not familiar with Doug Ford 6.5% 4.9% 8.1% 12.6% 2.9% 5.8% 5.2% 4% 7.9%
Not Sure 13.1% 10.3% 15.8% 12.6% 13.1% 14.4% 12.1% 16.3% 11.5%
Unweighted Frequency 592 268 324 32 76 204 280 112 480
Weighted Frequency 592 241 264 132 161 125 86 177 327

23
crosstabbed by party support

Party
Total PC NDP Liberals Green Other UD
Favourable 38.5% 86.4% 3.1% 5.8% 22.8% 31.7% 18.7%
Unfavourable 41.8% 3% 83.6% 68.2% 64.6% 41.3% 28.1%
Not familiar with Doug Ford 6.5% 0.9% 6.4% 9.9% 6.1% 0% 22.7%
Not Sure 13.1% 9.6% 6.9% 16.1% 6.5% 27% 30.5%
Unweighted Frequency 592 216 98 180 22 26 50
Weighted Frequency 592 192 92 141 20 14 44

crosstabbed by language

Language
Total English Cantonese Mandarin
Favourable 38.5% 37.5% 29.2% 84.7%
Unfavourable 41.8% 42.9% 45.6% 0%
Not familiar with Doug Ford 6.5% 6.4% 7.9% 7.7%
Not Sure 13.1% 13.1% 17.4% 7.7%
Unweighted Frequency 592 530 34 28
Weighted Frequency 592 467 22 15

24
Do you have a favourable or unfavourable opinion of Andrea Horwath?

19 %

42 %
9%

29 %

Favourable Unfavourable

Response Not familiar with Andrea Horwath Not Sure

crosstabbed by age, gender, and children in the household

Gender Age Have Children?


Total Male Female 18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Yes No
Favourable 42% 42.2% 41.9% 37.8% 60.3% 25.6% 38.3% 61.5% 31.5%
Unfavourable 29.4% 33.8% 25.4% 36.9% 23.8% 34.9% 20.3% 13.9% 37.7%
Not familiar with Andrea Horwath 9.5% 6.5% 12.2% 19.4% 2.9% 7.8% 9.2% 5% 11.9%
Not Sure 19.1% 17.5% 20.5% 5.9% 13.1% 31.8% 32.2% 19.6% 18.9%
Unweighted Frequency 592 268 324 32 76 204 280 112 480
Weighted Frequency 592 241 264 132 161 125 86 177 327

25
crosstabbed by party support

Party
Total PC NDP Liberals Green Other UD
Favourable 42% 21.9% 81% 37.9% 69.5% 65.2% 40.8%
Unfavourable 29.4% 50.2% 6.3% 24.5% 15% 3.9% 17.7%
Not familiar with Andrea Horwath 9.5% 11.2% 1.2% 8.5% 2.8% 9% 25.6%
Not Sure 19.1% 16.7% 11.5% 29.1% 12.6% 21.9% 15.8%
Unweighted Frequency 592 216 98 180 22 26 50
Weighted Frequency 592 192 92 141 20 14 44

crosstabbed by language

Language
Total English Cantonese Mandarin
Favourable 42% 43% 42.7% 11.5%
Unfavourable 29.4% 30.1% 30.3% 4.4%
Not familiar with Andrea Horwath 9.5% 7.9% 10.8% 59.3%
Not Sure 19.1% 19.1% 16.2% 24.8%
Unweighted Frequency 592 530 34 28
Weighted Frequency 592 467 22 15

26
Do you have a favourable or unfavourable opinion of Raymond Cho?

25 %
32 %

17 %

26 %

Favourable Unfavourable

Response Not familiar with Raymond Cho Not Sure

crosstabbed by age, gender, and children in the household

Gender Age Have Children?


Total Male Female 18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Yes No
Favourable 32.1% 34.5% 29.8% 36.9% 34.4% 29.3% 24.2% 38.9% 28.4%
Unfavourable 26% 22.8% 29% 26.1% 29.1% 19.9% 28.9% 26% 26%
Not familiar with Raymond Cho 16.8% 15.1% 18.3% 18.5% 11% 22.7% 16.2% 8% 21.5%
Not Sure 25.2% 27.6% 22.9% 18.5% 25.5% 28.1% 30.7% 27% 24.2%
Unweighted Frequency 592 268 324 32 76 204 280 112 480
Weighted Frequency 592 241 264 132 161 125 86 177 327

27
crosstabbed by party support

Party
Total PC NDP Liberals Green Other UD
Favourable 32.1% 40.6% 24% 26.1% 12.6% 65.8% 28.5%
Unfavourable 26% 16.1% 35.9% 33.5% 43% 8.4% 22.7%
Not familiar with Raymond Cho 16.8% 20.9% 9.4% 13.7% 9.4% 16.8% 27.1%
Not Sure 25.2% 22.4% 30.6% 26.8% 35% 9% 21.7%
Unweighted Frequency 592 216 98 180 22 26 50
Weighted Frequency 592 192 92 141 20 14 44

crosstabbed by language

Language
Total English Cantonese Mandarin
Favourable 32.1% 31.3% 63.1% 8.9%
Unfavourable 26% 27.3% 14.1% 3.8%
Not familiar with Raymond Cho 16.8% 15.6% 2.9% 75.2%
Not Sure 25.2% 25.8% 19.9% 12.1%
Unweighted Frequency 592 530 34 28
Weighted Frequency 592 467 22 15

28

You might also like