Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
- Frank Knight,
1.1 Introduction
In this context, it is imperative that the chief financial officers (CFOs) of these
companies be familiar with a variety of accounting tools and techniques with
which they can work to minimise their companies’ risk exposure. Financial risk
management in international accounting aims to minimise risk of loss from
unexpected changes in the prices of commodities and equities, or changes in
interest and inflation rates.
Intelligent risk management can help a company stabilise cash flows, reduce its
risk of insolvency, manage taxes better, and focus more effectively and efficiently
on its primary business risks. Effective risk management allows corporations and
their lenders to weather difficult situations and be able to survive the fall-out of
loan losses or corporate accounting scandals (Adler 2002). Intelligent risk
management at the level of international and multinational business operations
must take into account a myriad of factors, from the technical and the theoretical
to the political and practical.
qualitative and quantitative analysis and the efficacy of individual tools affect the
overall success of a company’s risk management program (Rahl & Lee 2000).
What does it take to manage risk for multinational firms with complex global
transactions and assets successfully?
The short answer, perhaps, is that it takes a great deal of expertise in financial
risk management. Financial risk management is a specialised area of
international accounting that requires specific training, tools and techniques, if
one is to be successful in mitigating risk for an international business. As such, in
this study, financial risk management was examined entirely from the perspective
of international accounting. The goal of this study is to show how risk mitigation
applies to firms with international holdings, assets, and transactions. The
study analysed the interplay of currency prices, exchange rates, and interest
rates with the technology of accounting systems, as well as the political and
cultural risks inherent in international operations.
At the end of the day, of course, risk is managed not by companies, but by
people. Risk management is usually the function of a company’s senior
accountants, who act as the “link” between a company’s business and financial
operations (Tunui 2002). Therefore, this study surveyed the risk management
practices of CFOs or other company accountants with risk management
responsibilities, and contrast the theory (or policy) of these practices with their
real-life application and practice.
The areas of financial analysis that concern the firm’s long-term strategy, such as
investment risk, credit risk, and insurance risk were also reviewed. As
considered in this study, investment risk deals with issues such as market
analysis, portfolio management, asset price volatility; credit risk comprises both
individual and corporate exposure; and insurance risk covers property, product,
and business liabilities.
6
Yet intelligent risk management requires more than a grasp of numbers and the
ability to calculate acceptable odds. For a multinational corporation, or even a
domestic company involved in exports or other supplier relationships with extra-
national parties, “firm-wide risk [can] not be represented by market and credit
functions alone” (Hoffman 2000). A risk management officer such as the CFO
must combine qualitative and quantitative risk management techniques to arrive
at a workable strategy for her company. She must also be able to asses the
effectiveness, efficacy, and applicability of each individual tool.
A great deal is written about specific risk management techniques and a great
deal is written about risk management models. Most of this discussion, however,
takes place at a very theoretical level. Those researchers engaged in empirical
research on specific companies or risk management strategies and practices
stress that more work in a similar vein is needed if CFOs and CEOs are to
possess reliable and valid data with which to address risk management for their
companies (inter alia, Linsmeier et al. 2002; Dhanani & Groves 2001; Mohanty
2001). There is a continuing need for more practical research that looks at
precisely how and why—and, most importantly, with what results—multinational
companies employ risk management techniques, how accountants understand,
and use, these tools, and how the different tools, strategies, and types of risk
interplay with and affect each other.
8
The purpose of this study is twofold. On a theoretical level, a new model for risk
management strategy in the international accounting field is to be suggested.
Existing models were considered in Chapter 2: Literature Review, and their
strengths and weaknesses identified. The new model towards which would be
working was based on two assumptions.
The first assumption was that the effectiveness and efficacy of both individual risk
management tools and overall company risk mitigation strategies ultimately was
the result of the skills and capabilities of its risk mitigation officers—usually, CFOs
or other senior accounting professionals. The second assumption was that the
specialist in international accounting needs to familiarise herself with local
conditions, regulations and policies that impact each of these areas of finance—in
other words, that she needs to be conversant with more than numbers.
The first step in this process lies in identifying the different types of risk. For the
purposes of this study, risks were divided into two broad categories: general
financial risks experienced in the international arena and political/cultural risks.
The former category comprises interest rate and debt-related risk as well as
currency and exchange rate risk. These as well as the political risks are outlined
below. The purpose is to provide an overview of the many different types of risks
that multinational corporations faced. This list was not comprehensive, and
additional financial risks were discussed in the literature review.
Interest rate risk is important in both domestic and international operations, but
multinational companies are more exposed to it. Interest rate risk is usually
defined as the degree of uncertainty for the rate of return from a bond or any
other convertible debt instrument or derivative. Interest rate risk is also concerned
with the changes in profits, cash flows, or valuation of the firm to changes in
interest rates. Viewed from the perspective of this definition, the firm should
analyse how its profit, cash outturns, and value change in response to changes in
interest rate levels.
(1) Risk of the bond issuer—i.e. is it a corporation or a government and what are
its risk management policies and thresholds,
(2) the liquidity of the bond—i.e., how easy is it to cash in; and
11
(3) the level of income taxes applied to the bond in the region—e.g., is the interest
income taxable, untaxed, or tax deferred.
Associated with interest-rate risk are debt-related risks. Debt-related risk usually
takes the form of interest-rate risk for long-term debt instruments the company
issues, which by their term have greater risk exposure than short-term issues. In
general, “prices and returns for long-term bonds are more volatile than those for
shorter-term bonds” and can generate capital gains and losses creating
substantial differences between their real return and the yield to maturity known
at the time of the purchase (Mishkin 1995, p. 90).
However, in doing so, the domestic dollar market is immediately reduced and the
Eurodollar market inflated, corresponding to the size of the money move. A $10
million deposit might not affect money rates in either realm, but it would affect
liquidity and interest rates within the selected banking circles involved, and these
effects would be felt all the way through the financial chain of related companies-
a fact financial officers need to be aware of.
12
A sub-group of exchange rate risk is the so-called strategic exchange rate risk, a
risk resulting from long-term movements in exchange rates. This form of
exchange rate risk is frequently characterized as the most important form of
exchange risk (Dhanani & Groves 2001).
Current risk-based capital standards account primarily for credit risk, interest rate
risk and market risks. However, non-credit risks, including asset concentrations
and liquidity risk, can significantly affect the performance of companies (Mohanty
2001). Indeed, several studies suggest that non-credit risks that lead to the
insolvency of banks and financial institutions (ibid.). The above discussed risks
are the primary concerns of most CFOS, but it is stressed they are not the only
ones. Moreover, in addition to these clearly monetary, financial and quantifiable
risks, multinational corporations have to deal with cultural and political risks.
risks ranges from exposure to changes in tax legislation, through the impacts of
exchange controls to restrictions affecting operation and financing in a host
currency. Multinational Companies are concerned with the measurement and
management of political risk. There are various approaches to the measurement
of political risk – most of them are subjective in nature.
One of the factors that cannot be quantified about political risk is that it is to a
large part perception-driven (Wagner 2002). For example, in Southeast Asia,
Indonesia has been traditionally seen as the country with the highest political risk
in the region, as borne out by rates of political risk insurance. China, being a
country with a great dominance of trade in the region, is perceived as a much
safer place with minimum level of political risks, while Singapore and Malaysia
are generally “not even on the radar screen” of political risk analysts. However,
worldwide reporting of the arrest of 13-suspected terrorists in January 2002
increased Singapore’s political risk rating to the equivalent of the much more
potentially volatile South Korea (Wagner 2002; see Appendix A2).
Associated with political risk, is cultural risk. Cultural risk is perhaps best defined
as comprising the rules of engagement for business in a particular culture.
McDonald’s recent announcement that it is closing 135 of his franchises—most in
the Middle East—can be seen as cultural risk in action.
14
Intelligent risk management helps a company stabilize cash flows, reduce risk of
insolvency, manage foreign taxes and focus on its primary business in each
country and market. It is particularly critical in Southeast Asia today, where
complex overseas operations are common for resident, host and guest firms
alike.
To keep track of the myriad details of a risk management system, managers now
rely upon a wide range of new tools and technologies-computer-based trading
systems, telecommunications technology, decision support systems that quantify
risk factors, and so on.
New computer-based tools are being introduced all the time, with recently
developed systems aimed at the specific needs of international accounts. The
technologies available to international accountants today quantify the financial
risks associated with interest-rate movements, volatile foreign-exchange rates
and erratic commodity-price movements. Many are effectively complete
methodology, software package and data set (Sessit 1999).
This study does not focus specifically on the use of specific systems or
technologies. However, it is important to consider which technologies
international accountants use because the relationship between system used and
strategy followed is a two-way one. Differences in risk management strategies
are associated largely with the types of tools—including systems—that are used.
While strategies should dictate the selection of tools, sometimes the availability of
certain systems dictates strategy. Differences among multinational corporations
regarding their concerns in choosing derivatives have been due to “driven to
some extent by differences in the accounting treatment internationally” (Lee et al.
2001).
15
Centralization is in and of itself neither bad nor good—its efficiency and efficacy
are ultimately tested by the appropriateness of its systems. Centralization is
likely to continue to increase as rapid advances in computing and information
technology increase the pace of financial market globalization and
sophistication. It is imperative that the financial instruments used in international
accounting keep pace with these developments.
The nature of international operations frequently provides the tools that mitigate
the risks inherent in that nature. Currency risk is frequently managed using
foreign exchange derivatives. Recent evidence suggests that large companies’
use of foreign exchange derivatives increases with the level of foreign currency
exposure as well as with the degree of geographic concentration, which is
indicative of using less natural hedging (Makar, DeBruin & Huffman 1999). Basic
exchange rate risk mitigation is frequently offered by companies’ banks (Tunui
2002).
16
Among the tools for addressing political risk is the purchase of political risk
insurance (PRI). Companies may choose to purchase PRI, or they may be
required to purchase it by their banks or financial institutions. Conservative by
nature, certain banks will not finance projects in regions perceived to have high
political risk without PRI—the banks’ own risk management technique (Wagner
2002). Rates of PRI purchase seem to be directly related to traumatic regional
and world events, such as the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United
States or the more recent events in Bali and Indonesia. At such times, as
demand potentially outstrips supply, prices for PRI are very high.
The above is merely a sampling of some of the tools available for risk mitigation.
These tools are both qualitative and quantitative in nature and their specific
efficacy and applicability were treated in further detail in Chapter 2. However,
tools are not enough. Evidence from China suggests that lack of adequate
supporting infrastructure, manifested in excessive earnings management (i.e.
ways of doing financial reporting in which managers intervene intentionally in the
financial reporting purposes to produce some private gains) and low quality
auditing, continues to affect the performance of Chinese companies. Even though
there are, utilization of sophisticated tools and attempts to comply with the
harmonized international accounting standards (Chen, Sun & Wang 2002).
Tools have to be used with care and they have to fit the background—financial,
economic, political, and cultural—in which they are operating.
What does the above mean for today’s international accounting professionals?
Simply, that there as many if not more risk management tools as there are risks
and business risk situations. An effective international accountant must know
which tool is appropriate for assessing which risk.