0 Up votes0 Down votes

435 views8 pagesThis work represents the author's analysis and opinions about the current orbital mechanics. Also, this work contains the analysis of the orbiting bodies movements. This analysis and calculations based on the orbital mechanics formulas show that the orbiting bodies cannot stay on their orbits and should fall down on the planet surface.

Mar 14, 2019

© © All Rights Reserved

This work represents the author's analysis and opinions about the current orbital mechanics. Also, this work contains the analysis of the orbiting bodies movements. This analysis and calculations based on the orbital mechanics formulas show that the orbiting bodies cannot stay on their orbits and should fall down on the planet surface.

© All Rights Reserved

435 views

This work represents the author's analysis and opinions about the current orbital mechanics. Also, this work contains the analysis of the orbiting bodies movements. This analysis and calculations based on the orbital mechanics formulas show that the orbiting bodies cannot stay on their orbits and should fall down on the planet surface.

© All Rights Reserved

- Hidden Figures Young Readers' Edition
- Hidden Figures: The American Dream and the Untold Story of the Black Women Mathematicians Who Helped Win the Space Race
- Hidden Figures: The American Dream and the Untold Story of the Black Women Mathematicians Who Helped Win the Space Race
- Hidden Figures Young Readers' Edition
- The Right Stuff
- Lost in Shangri-La: A True Story of Survival, Adventure, and the Most Incredible Rescue Mission of World War II
- The Last Second
- The Wright Brothers
- A Closed and Common Orbit
- A Closed and Common Orbit
- I Am Number Four: The Lost Files: The Navigator
- Cosmos: A Personal Voyage
- The Lost Years
- To Be Taught, If Fortunate: A Novella
- Out of the Silent Planet: (Space Trilogy, Book One)
- First Man: The Life of Neil A. Armstrong
- First Man: The Life of Neil A. Armstrong
- All Systems Red
- Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers

You are on page 1of 8

This analysis is simple; however, it is enough to begin to feel a doubt about the rightness of the use of the physical parameters such as the gravitational force and

its direction in the current orbital mechanics.

The empirical fact is that the gravitational force is always pulling mass(es) towards the Earth center

Earth

(assumed ideal sphere)

Page 1

First of all, offer to consider three situations of projectile motions of any mass (spaceship, others) in order to better understand illogical points of the current

orbital motions. All the three situations are assumed to be without air resistance. Notice that it does not matter where (left or right) mass(es) move to. In the third

situation, one assumes that a spaceship which is launched from the Earth to be set at the circular orbit has initially a projectile trajectory.

Please notice that the gravitational force is always straightly towards the Earth center; however, this is usually neglected (gravitational force is stated to act

straightly down) when analyzing projectile motions for short distances. Whether the gravitational force is REALLY (not formally) counted as a force towards the

Earth center in the complicated mathematical calculations to define the orbits and locations of masses (spaceships, International Space Station and others)?!

1. First situation 2. Second situation

Highest point of

Highest point of

B projectile motion

Gravitational force projectile motion Gravitational force

A

~ 500 m

~5m

~ 10 m

~ 1000 m

3. Third situation

C Highest point of projectile motion and

entry to the circular orbit

Gravitational force

~ 401 km

Page 2

~ 802 km

Offer to answer the following questions keeping in mind that the gravitational force is always towards the Earth center:

I. What is the free fall which begins from point A in the first situation?

II. What is the free fall which begins from point B in the second situation?

III. What is the free fall which begins from point C in the third situation?

IV. What differences are between the free falls in the first situation, the second situation, and the third situation?

V. If there are some differences between these three free falls, which conditions causes these differences?

VI. If there are NOT any fundamental differences, then Researcher offers to go to the next page and think about whether the distance between a mass

(spaceship) and the Earth center should start to decrease from point C (after a spaceship enters into the circular orbit) in the third situation?

Note: decreasing the distance between a mass (spaceship) and the Earth’s center must happen along the Earth radius line (diagram on page #6) because the

gravitational force pulls a mass (spaceship) to the Earth center!

Page 3

Before beginning the analysis of the situation when a spaceship enters into the circular orbit from a projectile trajectory, take some data from Wikipedia:

𝑚

2. The Earth gravitational acceleration (𝑔) near the Earth surface is: ~ 9.81 ;

𝑠2

𝑚 𝑚

3. The Earth gravitational acceleration at the height of 401 km is about 90% of that near the Earth surface: ~ 9.81 ∗ 0.9 = 8.829 ;

𝑠2 𝑠2

9.81+8.829 𝑚

4. Use an average gravitational acceleration to simplify further calculations: 𝑔𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 = = 9.3195 ;

2 𝑠2

5. The height (at perigee) of International Space Station’s orbit over the Earth surface is: ~ 401.1 𝑘𝑖𝑙𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠 𝑘𝑚 = 401100 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠 (𝑚) ;

𝑘𝑚 𝑚

6. The orbital speed of International Space Station (ISS) at the height of 401 km is: ~ 7.67 = 7670 ;

𝑠 𝑠

7. The orbital period of International Space Station (ISS) is: ~ 92.65 𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑠 (𝑚𝑖𝑛) = 5559 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑠 (𝑠) ;

Page 4

Now, please analyze the third situation when a spaceship has a magnitude of its velocity enough to counter-clockwise enter into the circular orbit at the height of

𝑘𝑚

401.1 km above the Earth surface at point C. Assume that the speed of around 7.67 is satisfactory to enter into the circular orbit at point C (ISS orbit is almost

𝑠

circular). It is known that the gravitational acceleration at the height of 401.1 km is about 90% of that on the Earth surface. Use the average gravitational

𝑚

acceleration 9.3195 2 to simplify the calculations. The Earth is assumed to be an ideal sphere in this analysis.

𝑠

There are NOT any fundamental differences (gravitational force always towards the Earth center) between the three free falls in the three situations; therefore, it is

possible to calculate 𝑡 (time which is needed to decrease the distance (6371 km + 401 km = 6772 km) between a spaceship and the Earth center by 401.1 km along

the Earth radius line (see diagram on the next page) starting from point C:

𝑚

𝑔𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 ∗𝑡 2 9.3195 2 ∗𝑡 2 ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡∗2 401.1 𝑘𝑚 ∗2 401100 𝑚∗2

𝑠

𝑖𝑓 ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 = = , 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑡 = = 𝑚 = 𝑚 = 293.38 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑠 (𝑠)

2 2 𝑔𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 9.3195 2 9.3195 2

𝑠 𝑠

Next, find a horizontal distance (𝐷) which a spaceship passes from point C in 293.38 seconds:

𝑚

𝐷 ≈ 7670 ∗ 293.38 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑠 = 2250224.6 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠 ≈ 2250 𝑘𝑖𝑙𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠!

𝑠

Also, notice that the horizontal component (horizontal speed) of a spaceship’s velocity starts to decrease from point C; hence, a spaceship goes a horizontal

distance less than 2250 km in 293.38 s. Therefore, a spaceship should hit the Earth surface at some 2250 km away from point C in 293.38 s. It is important to

highlight that the horizontal distance of 2250 km is almost three times less than the Earth radius (see diagram on the next page)!:

2250.2246 𝑘𝑚 2250.2246 𝑘𝑚

2250.2246 𝑘𝑚 = ∗ 100% = ∗ 100% ≈ 35.32% 𝑜𝑓 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝐸𝑎𝑟𝑡ℎ 𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑢𝑠

𝐸𝑎𝑟𝑡ℎ 𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑢𝑠 6371 𝑘𝑚

As the gravitational force is pulling a spaceship towards the Earth center, offer to analyze what can prevent decreasing the distance between a spaceship and the

Earth center along the Earth radius line starting from point C (see diagram on the next page):

1. How strongly can the horizontal component of the speed of a spaceship prevent decreasing the distance (along the Earth’s radius line) between a spaceship

and the Earth center?

2. How strongly can the vertical component of the speed of a spaceship prevent decreasing the distance (along the Earth’s radius line) between a spaceship

and the Earth center?

Page 5

This diagram illustrates the situation when a spaceship counter-clockwise enters into the circular orbit at point C from a

projectile motion and then hits the Earth surface in about 293.38 seconds

~ 401 km

Point which a spaceship hits

the Earth surface at in about

293.38 sec.

~ 2250 km

Earth radius

~ 6371 km

Earth radius Earth radius line

~ 6371 km

Earth

(ideal sphere)

Earth radius line

Page 6

Analysis of the circular orbital motion and diagram on the previous page #6:

The orbital period of International Space Station (ISS) is about 92.65 minutes. Although this period is for the elliptical orbit of ISS with perigee 401.1 km and apogee

𝑚

408 km, the period may be applied for the circular orbit at the height 401.1 km above the Earth surface if ISS moves at the speed 7.67 because this elliptical

𝑠

orbit is very close to the circular orbit. Hence, one can figure out how much time a spaceship needs to pass its path in the left upper quarter of its circular orbit (see

diagram on the previous page):

= = 23.1625 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑠 = 1389.75 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑠

4 4

As it was calculated, the time necessary for a spaceship to touch the Earth surface is about 293.38 seconds. This time is almost five times less than that necessary

to pass the path in the left upper quarter of the circular orbital motion:

= 4.737 𝑜𝑟 ∗ 100% = 21.11% 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑟!

293.38 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑠 1389.75

As seen, the time (293.38 s) which is needed to decrease the distance (401.1 km + 6371 km = 6772 km) between a spaceship and the Earth’s center by 401.1 km

starting at point C is only 21.11% of the time which a spaceship needs to pass its path in the left upper quarter of its circular orbit!

To summarize, the horizontal component (horizontal speed) and the vertical component (vertical speed) of a spaceship velocity cannot so drastically prevent

decreasing the distance between a spaceship and the Earth center along the Earth radius line.

Page 7

Conclusion:

International Space Station (ISS) or spaceship cannot orbit the Earth eternally (at about 401 km above the Earth surface) based on the free fall conception because

the above calculations prove that they must hit the Earth surface in about 5 minutes (293.38 seconds). However, we observe that ISS , satellites, and spaceships

orbit the Earth eternally despite the calculations. It means that the orbital mechanics is contradictory! Moreover, it describes the natural processes incompletely.

Page 8

- Physics ProjectUploaded byClarice Nablo
- Rethinking the classical mechanics (orbital mechanics), Part #6 of 10Uploaded byBoris
- Derivatives as non-existing rates in physics and engineeringUploaded byBoris
- Physics I Problems (59).pdfUploaded bybosschellen
- Orbits and SCL PresentationUploaded byChad Hunt
- The Whole Solar System has been set up especially for manUploaded byBaican Cao
- Why the Moon's Orbit is ConvexUploaded byAnonymous e8BzOGqlaw
- Walter Russell.pdfUploaded byCharles Barony
- Science, Religion and the GreeksUploaded bybeboe
- Garfinkle 2014Uploaded byprigogine
- e-portfolioUploaded byapi-303097719
- fulltext(2)Uploaded bypjblk
- Building pyramids using primitive technologyUploaded byAjmal Beg
- Sungod the Most Probable Theory of Our TimeUploaded byanon-386572
- CLS_JEEAD-18-19_XI_phy_Target-3_SET-1_Chapter-8.pdfUploaded byAshutosh Mohapatra
- Formation of Kuiper-belt binaries through multiple chaotic scattering encounters with low-mass intrudersUploaded byardeegee
- Introduction to Astrophysics 4Uploaded byAndres Molina
- The Lindstedt Poincare Technique As Algorithm.pdfUploaded byBharath Reddy
- Theory of RelativityUploaded byYagnik Bandyopadhyay
- GpsUploaded byn_pauldavid
- orbital motion 2Uploaded byapi-247530883
- orbital motion 2Uploaded byapi-264763273
- Sir Isaac NewtonUploaded byEchaKaniasari
- WudkaGR-7Uploaded byPranalistia Tiara Putri
- force be with you 3Uploaded byapi-419037032
- ch2exUploaded byTeanu Jose Gabrillo Tamayo
- 58_IJFPS_Dec_2013_68_74Uploaded byhans peter
- Dharma Chapt 11 Sistema Satelital 2002Uploaded bygjaftelecom
- S. Nojiri et al- Can primordial wormholes be induced by GUTs at the early Universe?Uploaded byRtpom
- Reginald T. Cahill- The Einstein Postulates: 1905-2005: A Critical Review of the EvidenceUploaded byPortsnuyh

- Rethinking the classical mechanics, Part #8 of 10Uploaded byBoris
- Experiment #2, The experimental project "A try to look up beyond the classical mechanics"Uploaded byBoris
- Rethink the classic mechanics (orbital mechanics), Part #7 of 10Uploaded byBoris
- Rethinking the classical mechanics (orbital mechanics), Part #5 of 10Uploaded byBoris
- Rethinking the classical mechanics, Part #3 of 10Uploaded byBoris
- Rethinking the classical mechanics, Part #2 of 10Uploaded byBoris
- Rethinking the classical mechanics, Part #1 of 10Uploaded byBoris

- ACCT 407 Chapter 4 Select End of ChapterUploaded bytrevor
- Geoeconomics and GeoeconometricsUploaded byCamilla Zampa
- Torchmate CAD 5 GuideUploaded byJuanLuisIglesias
- RoleUploaded byTechneto Tonic
- Civicus Report 2019Uploaded byvaccideals
- AakashUploaded bykrishna
- Resume Aug 08Uploaded bymespenlaub
- ask the expertsUploaded byblackeagle1245
- Shahi (2013) ThesisUploaded byPedro Troncoso Acuña
- V Controller GeneralUploaded byattila_tamas4283
- The Feynman Lectures on Physics Vol. I Ch.pdfUploaded byDeevita Dv
- Cost-effective Piled-raft Foundation for High-rise BuildingUploaded byxheurtaux
- HIMax Brochure V07 EUploaded bybarcellona6
- Volunteering and Health: What impact does it really have?Uploaded byNCVO
- cultural immersion assignment 1Uploaded byapi-301812156
- momo lteUploaded byسام النعمان
- Face Liveness Detection for Biometric Antispoofing Applications using Color Texture and Distortion Analysis FeaturesUploaded byEditor IJRITCC
- Oladipo Omoware CVUploaded byOladipo Omoware
- The Role of Facial Attractiveness and Facial Masculinity- Femininity in Sex Classification of FacesUploaded byChunHung Wong
- SWOT Analysis European Maritime and Fisheries FundUploaded byAnjum Sattar
- GS_EP_FP_413_ENUploaded byAnonymous N2jMFZ0zmg
- Ambreen Muhammad (1)Uploaded byshaaz ambreen
- Mary - Binet Kamat IT.docxUploaded byEva97doe
- Performance Scales Karnofki ScoreUploaded byHengky
- Theories of PunishmentUploaded byChetan Kaushik
- ELSE ISSUE 00_10_21Uploaded byavaquerocastro
- Balance Forward BillingUploaded bysen2985
- SGDE3Uploaded bySCVLife
- Developer Reading ListUploaded byfaeros9998575
- 342158614-1-DLL-GEN-BIO-1.docxUploaded bymarizel salcedo

## Much more than documents.

Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.

Cancel anytime.