Geddes 1
Mike Geddes
Mr. Rodman
U.S History 1
16 December 2008
2 n d quarter paper
Hamilton vs. Jefferson
Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, and Aaron Burr. These
three men were extremely important in the election of 1800. Jefferson and
Burr were running mates in the Democratic - Republican Party. Although
not in the election Hamilton played a decisive role in its outcome.
Hamilton was a strong federalist and a strict constructionist. Hamilton
detested both men but would prefer Jefferson more as president than Burr.
Jefferson and Hamilton were almost complete opposites but when the
election went to the House of Representatives and most federalists voted
for Burr, Hamilton intervened for Jefferson which let Jefferson attain the
presidency. Hamilton and Jefferson had very different political views and
somewhat similar economic views. Hamilton was a strict constructionist
where Jefferson wanted to reform Virginia’s government as the states
house delegate, the fact that both men opposed British ways of economy,
and both men had different views on the idea of a national Bank.
After the Constitution was written political figures divided two
ways: loose constructionists and strict constructionists. A strict
Geddes 2
constructionist was someone who followed exactly what they Constitution
said and didn’t make any changes, whereas loose constructionists would
follow the Constitution they also would make changes outside of the
Constitution. This made the two’s political views very different. In fact
Jefferson said this about Hamilton and his views on the American
Republic: “I mentioned to [Alexander] Hamilton a letter received from
John Adams, disavowing “Publicola, and denying that he ever entertained
a wish to bring this country under a hereditary Executive, or introduce an
hereditary branch of legislature, &c. Hamilton, condemning Mr. Adams's
writings and most particularly “Davila”, as having a tendency to weaken
the present government” (Jefferson, Thomas. The Anas. August 1791).
Jefferson highlighted that Hamilton had gone against a powerful political
figures ways. Hamilton’s response to Jefferson’s statement was: “I own it
is my opinion, though I do not publish it in Dan or Beersheba, that the
present government is not that which will answer the ends of society, by
giving stability and protection to its rights, and that it will probably be
found expedient to go into the British form. However, since we have
undertaken the experiment, I am for giving it a fair course…” (Hamilton,
Alexander said to Thomas Jefferson. The Anas. August 1791.) Hamilton
was just saying all the right things he didn’t want to give it a try. Also it
is said that when Jefferson was elected to Virginia’s House of Delegates
he wanted to reform their set of laws. If Hamilton was in Jefferson’s
position he only would have followed the Constitution exactly. History
Geddes 3
shows this made Jefferson a better politician because he understood that
you should follow the Constitution but you still should look for an
alternative from it time to time to make your home a better place to live
in.
Both men liked France more than they did Britain. Although when
Hamilton was chosen as George Washington’s Secretary of the Treasury,
Forrest McDonald said Hamilton saw his office as like the British’s
Chancellor of Exchequer, which is almost like a prime minister. Jefferson
was a Minister to France from 1785 until 1789 which meant he missed the
Philadelphia convention “editing the articles of Confederation”. He was
not too upset though because he mostly agreed with what was decided
upon at the convention. Even though Jefferson was a French Minister he
did have this to say about Napoleon Bonaparte: “Bonaparte's restless
spirit leaves no hope of peace to the world” (Jefferson, Thomas. To
Thomas Leiper. 1813.) Hamilton spoke out against the British in his
speech at the ratifying convention in New York. “Here sir, the people
govern” (Hamilton, Alexander. Speech to the New York Ratifying
Convention, June 17, 1788). Hamilton is saying that over in Britain you
might want one person to decide everything for you, but here we let the
people decide what the country needs. This shows that both men were not
afraid to speak out against other foreign powers to try and get the truth
across to the people in the United States of America.
Geddes 4
The idea of the National Bank was a topic of great discussion
between Jefferson and Hamilton. Hamilton came up with the idea while he
was in the Secretary of the Treasury in 1789. Hamilton also felt that the
U.S needed to immediately pay off all their debts from the Revolutionary
War and other ideas such as using Adam Smith’s idea of capitalism and
establishing policies that helped industry to help the young nation.
Jefferson was completely against the thought of a National Bank. He felt
it was unconstitutional. “The idea of creating a national bank, I do not
concur in, because it seems now decided that Congress has not that
power (although I sincerely wish they had it exclusively), and because I
think there is already a vast redundancy, rather than a scarcity of paper
medium. The rapid rise in the nominal price of land and labor (while war
and blockade should produce a fall) proves the progressive state of the
depreciation of our medium .” (Jefferson, Thomas. To Thomas Law
Monticello 1813). On the idea of a National Bank Hamilton said
“Industry is increased, commodities are multiplied, agriculture and
manufacturers flourish: and herein consists the true wealth and
prosperity of a state.” (Hamilton, Alexander. Report on a National Bank,
December 13, 1790). Both men were very adamant on their thoughts
about the National Bank. Hamilton thought it was extremely necessary for
the country to adapt. Whereas Jefferson felt it was hostile to the U.S. by
saying: “This institution is one of the most deadly hostility existing,
against the principles and form of our Constitution. The nation is, at this
Geddes 5
time, so strong and united in its sentiments, that it cannot be shaken at
this moment. But suppose a series of untoward events should occur,
sufficient to bring into doubt the competency of a republican government
to meet a crisis of great danger, or to unhinge the confidence of the
people in the public functionaries...I deem no government safe which is
under the vassalage of any self-constituted authorities, or any other
authority than that of the nation, or its regular functionaries.” (Jefferson,
Thomas. To Albert Gallatin. Washington, December 1803). This is just
Jefferson saying that suppose when the country’s running just well and
fine something involved with the bank happens and throws the country
into turmoil, he also says he won’t follow any government built around
man made establishments. Just like many other matters Hamilton and
Jefferson had very different opinions on the idea of a National Bank
Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton. Both men despised each
other and said terrible things about each other and each other’s ideas.
Jefferson said this about Hamilton: “Hamilton was honest as a man, but,
as a politician, believing in the necessity of either force or corruption to
govern men.” (Jefferson, Thomas. To Dr. Benjamin Rush, Monticello
1813). But in essence if we look at both these men clearly we may find
that they are in fact quite similar men. Both men were politicians who
wanted to do whatever was necessary to better their country for their
fellow Americans. However closely we may examine these two men we
Geddes 6
will see that they both had very different views on politics and the
economy.
Much more than documents.
Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.
Cancel anytime.