You are on page 1of 25

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – DIVISION OF LANAO DEL NORTE

TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION


Training
Training Title : :
Date(s)
Trainee : Trainer :
Objective of Training:

5 - Much better | 4 - Little better | 3 - The same | 2 - Little Worse | 1 - Much Worse
IMPROVEMENT RATING
# CRITERIA COMMENTS / REMARKS
5 4 3 2 1
Trainee’s Evaluation (to be conducted right after the training)
1. Did the course enhance your knowledge /  /
skill? /
Give specific examples of knowledge or /
skill: /
2. To what extent have you been able to apply
the knowledge / skills gained from this
course?
3. Did this course have aspects which proved
to be of most value to you in your work?
Please specify:
4. Did this course help you in improving your
process or the way you handle your tasks?
Give specific example of improved results:
5. Do you feel that the objectives were met?
6. Are there any aspects of the course that
you now feel should have been handled
differently?
Immediate Superior’s Evaluation Planned Date Of Evaluation: 30 days/ 60 days /
90 days
1. Did the course enhance your staff’s
knowledge / skill? Give specific examples of
knowledge or skill:
2. To what extent has your staff been able to
apply the knowledge / skills gained from
this course?
3. Did this course have aspects which proved
to be of most value to the work of your
staff? Please specify:
4. Did this course help you in improving your
process or the way you handle your tasks?
Give specific example of improved results:
5. Do you feel that the objectives were met?
6. Are there any aspects of the course that
you now feel should have been handled
differently?

Done by:
Trainee’s Rating
Superior’s Rating
Trainee’s Signature / Date Superior’s Name & Signature /
Overall Rating
Date

Action Items (if any):

FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – DIVISION OF LANAO DEL NORTE

TRAINING NEEDS ANALYSIS


Year: Control No.:
PERSONNEL AND JOB INFORMATION
Name: CLAM, SHIRWEN DATAYAN Department: DepED

Position: MT-I Date Hired: June 13, 1989 No. of Years/Mos in Position: 29 yrs/ 1mo.

Job Function
Summary:

*Legend: Priority: UN – Urgently Needed; LN – Lightly Needed; NN – Not Needed


Competence Level: NB – No Basic Knowledge; NLD – Needs Lot of Development; NSD – Need Some Development; WD – Well Developed

ANALYSIS
Priority Competence Level
Competency (UN / LN /
NB NLD NSD WD
NN)
I. Knowledge
Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and
1. purposive and takes into account personal goals and values LN /
congruent to that of the organization.
Prioritize work tasks and schedules to achieve goals
2. LN /

3.
4.
5.
II. Skills (technical and soft)
Achieve results with optimal use of time and resources most of
1. UN /
the time.
Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work
2. LN /
methods by placing organizational needs before personal needs.
3.
4.
5.
III. Attitude (behavioral)
Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of
1. LN /
attendance and punctuality, good grooming and communication.
Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the
2. LN /
organization’s needs and help others improve their effectiveness.
3.
4.
5.
Additional Comments / Remarks:

Conducted by Reviewed by

Name & Signature Department Head HR Head


Date: Date: Date:

FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – DIVISION OF LANAO DEL NORTE

TRAINING RECORD
ID No. : Position :
Group / Page of
Name :
Area:
TRAINING CERTIFICATE?
# TRAINING / AWARENESS TITLE TRAINER REMARKS
DATE(S) (Y/N)

FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – DIVISION OF LANAO DEL NORTE

TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION


Training
Training Title : AE Training Workshop for Newly Hired English Teachers : Oct. 26, 2018
Date(s)
Trainee : CHERYL L. SILVA Trainer : AE Facilitators/AlleliFaith P. Leyritana
Objective of Training: To re-orient English teachers on strategies in teaching the macro skills and in creating interactive
activities

5 - Much better | 4 - Little better | 3 - The same | 2 - Little Worse | 1 - Much Worse
IMPROVEMENT RATING
# CRITERIA COMMENTS / REMARKS
5 4 3 2 1
Trainee’s Evaluation (to be conducted right after the training)
1. Did the course enhance your knowledge / Yes. I was able to enhance my skills in making /
skill? activities suited to their learning ability and at
Give specific examples of knowledge or the same time enjoy the process of learning.
skill:
2. To what extent have you been able to apply Full extent. I am currently doing/applying the /
the knowledge / skills gained from this strategies learnt.
course?
3. Did this course have aspects which proved Yes! I learnt enormous games that are /
to be of most value to you in your work? appropriate in teaching the four macro skills.
Please specify:
4. Did this course help you in improving your YES /
process or the way you handle your tasks?
Give specific example of improved results:
5. Do you feel that the objectives were met? NO
6. Are there any aspects of the course that
you now feel should have been handled
differently?
Immediate Superior’s Evaluation Planned Date Of Evaluation: 30 days/ 60 days /
90 days
1. Did the course enhance your staff’s
knowledge / skill? Give specific examples of
knowledge or skill:
2. To what extent has your staff been able to
apply the knowledge / skills gained from
this course?
3. Did this course have aspects which proved
to be of most value to the work of your
staff? Please specify:
4. Did this course help you in improving your
process or the way you handle your tasks?
Give specific example of improved results:
5. Do you feel that the objectives were met?
6. Are there any aspects of the course that
you now feel should have been handled
differently?

Done by:
Trainee’s Rating
Superior’s Rating
Trainee’s Signature / Date Superior’s Name & Signature /
Overall Rating
Date

Action Items (if any):

FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – DIVISION OF LANAO DEL NORTE

TRAINING NEEDS ANALYSIS


Year: Control No.:
PERSONNEL AND JOB INFORMATION
Name: CHERYL L. SILVA Department: DepED

Position: T-1 Date Hired: 6/19/17 No. of Years/Mos in Position: 1 year & 7 mos

Job Function
Summary:

*Legend: Priority: UN – Urgently Needed; LN – Lightly Needed; NN – Not Needed


Competence Level: NB – No Basic Knowledge; NLD – Needs Lot of Development; NSD – Need Some Development; WD – Well Developed

ANALYSIS
Priority Competence Level
Competency (UN / LN /
NB NLD NSD WD
NN)
I. Knowledge

1. Strategic thinker /
Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates and
2. /
strategies based on DepEd strategies & directions
Develops and adopts service improvement programs through
3. /
simplified procedures that will further enhance service delivery
4.
5.
II. Skills (technical and soft)

1. Enjoys working hard /

2. Gets things done on time & optimum use of resources /

3. Builds team spirit /

4. Willingly does his/her share of responsibility /

5.
III. Attitude (behavioral)

1. Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization needs /


Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at
2. waste or inefficiency. May focus on new or more precise ways of /
meeting goals set.
3.
4.
5.
Additional Comments / Remarks:

Conducted by Reviewed by

Name & Signature Department Head HR Head


Date: Date: Date:

FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – DIVISION OF LANAO DEL NORTE

TRAINING RECORD
ID No. : Position : T-I
Group / Page of
Name : CHERYL L. SILVA
Area:
TRAINING CERTIFICATE?
# TRAINING / AWARENESS TITLE TRAINER REMARKS
DATE(S) (Y/N)
I had fun
American English Training Workshop for Maria Eva S. Edon/ AE
Oct. 26, 2018 YES learning
Newly Hired English Teachers Facilitator
about AE

FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – DIVISION OF LANAO DEL NORTE

TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION


Training
Training Title : AE American English : Oct. 26, 2018
Date(s)
Trainee : Adela R. Corbo Trainer : AE Facilitators/Allei Faith P. Leyritana
Objective of Training: To re-orient English teachers on strategies in teaching the macro-skills and in creating interactive
activities

5 - Much better | 4 - Little better | 3 - The same | 2 - Little Worse | 1 - Much Worse
IMPROVEMENT RATING
# CRITERIA COMMENTS / REMARKS
5 4 3 2 1
Trainee’s Evaluation (to be conducted right after the training)
1. Did the course enhance your knowledge / Yes. I was able to enhance my skills in /
skill? teaching the pupils
Give specific examples of knowledge or
skill:
2. To what extent have you been able to apply /
the knowledge / skills gained from this
course?
3. Did this course have aspects which proved Yes. I learned many games that are /
to be of most value to you in your work? appropriate in teaching English
Please specify:
4. Did this course help you in improving your Yes. It provides varied activities in teaching /
process or the way you handle your tasks? English
Give specific example of improved results:
5. Do you feel that the objectives were met? Yes /
6. Are there any aspects of the course that NO /
you now feel should have been handled
differently?
Immediate Superior’s Evaluation Planned Date Of Evaluation: 30 days/ 60 days /
90 days
1. Did the course enhance your staff’s
knowledge / skill? Give specific examples of
knowledge or skill:
2. To what extent has your staff been able to
apply the knowledge / skills gained from
this course?
3. Did this course have aspects which proved
to be of most value to the work of your
staff? Please specify:
4. Did this course help you in improving your
process or the way you handle your tasks?
Give specific example of improved results:
5. Do you feel that the objectives were met?
6. Are there any aspects of the course that
you now feel should have been handled
differently?

Done by:
Trainee’s Rating
Superior’s Rating
Trainee’s Signature / Date Superior’s Name & Signature /
Overall Rating
Date

Action Items (if any):

FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – DIVISION OF LANAO DEL NORTE

TRAINING NEEDS ANALYSIS


Year: Control No.:
PERSONNEL AND JOB INFORMATION
Name: ADELA R. CORBO Department: DepED

Position: T-1 Date Hired: 5/15/13 No. of Years/Mos in Position: 5 years

Job Function
Summary:

*Legend: Priority: UN – Urgently Needed; LN – Lightly Needed; NN – Not Needed


Competence Level: NB – No Basic Knowledge; NLD – Needs Lot of Development; NSD – Need Some Development; WD – Well Developed

ANALYSIS
Priority Competence Level
Competency (UN / LN /
NB NLD NSD WD
NN)
I. Knowledge

1. Sets personal goals and direction, needs and development /


Develop and adopts service improvement programs through
2. /
simplified procedures that will further enhance service delivery
3.
4.
5.
II. Skills (technical and soft)
Is action-oriented and full of energy for the things he/she sees as
1. /
challenging
2. Builds team spirit /

3. Enjoy working hard /

4.
5.
III. Attitude (behavioral)

1. Support equal and fair treatment and opportunity for all /

2. Makes personal sacrifice to meet the organization needs. /

3.
4.
5.
Additional Comments / Remarks:

Conducted by Reviewed by

Name & Signature Department Head HR Head


Date: Date: Date:

FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – DIVISION OF LANAO DEL NORTE

TRAINING RECORD
ID No. : Position : T-I
Group / Page of
Name : ADELA R. CORBO
Area:
TRAINING CERTIFICATE?
# TRAINING / AWARENESS TITLE TRAINER REMARKS
DATE(S) (Y/N)
I had fun
Maria Eva S. Edon/AE
AE American English Oct. 26, 2018 Y learning
Facilitator
about AE

FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – DIVISION OF LANAO DEL NORTE

TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION


Division Seminar-Workshop for Guidance Training
Training Title : : Nov. 26-28, 2018
Counselors/Designates Date(s)
Prof. Joey A. Cabrera, RGC, FRIGC, RPm
Trainee : EMERITA M. DAITANO Trainer : Prof. Joey Marie F. Jegonia, RGC, RPSY, OD
Fe Psychie N. Nival, RGC
Objective of Training:

5 - Much better | 4 - Little better | 3 - The same | 2 - Little Worse | 1 - Much Worse
IMPROVEMENT RATING
# CRITERIA COMMENTS / REMARKS
5 4 3 2 1
Trainee’s Evaluation (to be conducted right after the training)
1. Did the course enhance your knowledge / Yes. I was able to know my duties and /
skill? responsibilities as school guidance
Give specific examples of knowledge or advocate/coach.
skill:
2. To what extent have you been able to apply Full extent /
the knowledge / skills gained from this
course?
3. Did this course have aspects which proved I learned the value of possessing good /
to be of most value to you in your work? attitudes in dealing with pupils who have
Please specify: problems.
4. Did this course help you in improving your I learned that as Guidance advocate/coach, I /
process or the way you handle your tasks? should only be a good listener to the pupils. I
Give specific example of improved results: am not allowed to do counseling.
5. Do you feel that the objectives were met? YES /
6. Are there any aspects of the course that NONE /
you now feel should have been handled
differently?
Immediate Superior’s Evaluation Planned Date Of Evaluation: 30 days/ 60 days /
90 days
1. Did the course enhance your staff’s
knowledge / skill? Give specific examples of
knowledge or skill:
2. To what extent has your staff been able to
apply the knowledge / skills gained from
this course?
3. Did this course have aspects which proved
to be of most value to the work of your
staff? Please specify:
4. Did this course help you in improving your
process or the way you handle your tasks?
Give specific example of improved results:
5. Do you feel that the objectives were met?
6. Are there any aspects of the course that
you now feel should have been handled
differently?

Done by:
Trainee’s Rating
Superior’s Rating
Trainee’s Signature / Date Superior’s Name & Signature /
Overall Rating
Date

Action Items (if any)

FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – DIVISION OF LANAO DEL NORTE

TRAINING NEEDS ANALYSIS


Year: Control No.:
PERSONNEL AND JOB INFORMATION
Name: EMERITA M. DAITANO Department: DepED

Position: T-I Date Hired: 09/08/2008 No. of Years/Mos in Position: 10years

Job Function School Guidance - Designate


Summary:

*Legend: Priority: UN – Urgently Needed; LN – Lightly Needed; NN – Not Needed


Competence Level: NB – No Basic Knowledge; NLD – Needs Lot of Development; NSD – Need Some Development; WD – Well Developed

ANALYSIS
Priority Competence Level
Competency (UN / LN /
NB NLD NSD WD
NN)
I. Knowledge

1. Sets personal goals and direction, needs & development UN /


Achieve results with optimal use of time and resources most of
2. UN /
the time
3. Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility UN /

4.
5.
II. Skills (technical and soft)

1. Enjoys working hard. UN /


Is action-oriented and full of energy for the things he/she sees as
2. UN /
challenging.
3. Not fearful of acting with a minimum of planning. UN /

4. Seizes more opportunities than others. UN /

5. Strategic thinker UN /

III. Attitude (behavioral)


Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and
1. UN /
purposive.
2. Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organizations. UN /

3. Willingly does his/her share of responsibility. UN /


Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting
4. UN /
customer service issues and concerns.
Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective
5. UN /
solutions
Additional Comments / Remarks:

Conducted by Reviewed by

Name & Signature Department Head HR Head


Date: Date: Date:

FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – DIVISION OF LANAO DEL NORTE

TRAINING RECORD
ID No. : Position : T-I
Group / Page of
Name : EMERITA M. DAITANO
Area:
TRAINING CERTIFICATE?
# TRAINING / AWARENESS TITLE TRAINER REMARKS
DATE(S) (Y/N)
Joey A. Cabrera
Seminar-Workshop for Guidance
Joey Marie F. Jegonia Nov. 26-28, 2018 Y
Counselors/Designates
Fe Psychie N. Nival

FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – DIVISION OF LANAO DEL NORTE

TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION


District In-Service Training for the Unified Budget of Work Training
Training Title : : Nov. 23, 2018
on Learning Competencies in Mathematics Date(s)
Trainee : EVELYN G. MAGSAYO Trainer : Rolando P. Bravo
Objective of Training: Making of Unified Budget of Work on Learning Competencies in Mathematics

5 - Much better | 4 - Little better | 3 - The same | 2 - Little Worse | 1 - Much Worse
IMPROVEMENT RATING
# CRITERIA COMMENTS / REMARKS
5 4 3 2 1
Trainee’s Evaluation (to be conducted right after the training)
1. Did the course enhance your knowledge /
skill? Self-Management /
Give specific examples of knowledge or
skill:
2. To what extent have you been able to apply /
the knowledge / skills gained from this
course?
3. Did this course have aspects which proved Improves systems and help others improve /
to be of most value to you in your work? their effectiveness
Please specify:
4. Did this course help you in improving your Priorities work tasks and students /
process or the way you handle your tasks?
Give specific example of improved results:
5. Do you feel that the objectives were met? /
6. Are there any aspects of the course that /
you now feel should have been handled
differently?
Immediate Superior’s Evaluation Planned Date Of Evaluation: 30 days/ 60 days /
90 days
1. Did the course enhance your staff’s
knowledge / skill? Give specific examples of
knowledge or skill:
2. To what extent has your staff been able to
apply the knowledge / skills gained from
this course?
3. Did this course have aspects which proved
to be of most value to the work of your
staff? Please specify:
4. Did this course help you in improving your
process or the way you handle your tasks?
Give specific example of improved results:
5. Do you feel that the objectives were met?
6. Are there any aspects of the course that
you now feel should have been handled
differently?

Done by:
Trainee’s Rating
Superior’s Rating
Trainee’s Signature / Date Superior’s Name & Signature /
Overall Rating
Date

Action Items (if any):

FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – DIVISION OF LANAO DEL NORTE

TRAINING NEEDS ANALYSIS


Year: Control No.:
PERSONNEL AND JOB INFORMATION
Name: EVELYN G. MAGSAYO Department: DepED

Position: T-I Date Hired: 07/09/2018 No. of Years/Mos in Position: 5 mos

Job Function
Summary:

*Legend: Priority: UN – Urgently Needed; LN – Lightly Needed; NN – Not Needed


Competence Level: NB – No Basic Knowledge; NLD – Needs Lot of Development; NSD – Need Some Development; WD – Well Developed

ANALYSIS
Priority Competence Level
Competency (UN / LN /
NB NLD NSD WD
NN)
I. Knowledge

1. Prioritize work tasks and schedules to achieve goals /

2.
3.
4.
5.
II. Skills (technical and soft)
Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to
1. /
standard operating procedures correctly
2.
3.
4.
5.
III. Attitude (behavioral)
Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the
1. organizations’ needs, improve systems and help improve their /
effectiveness.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Additional Comments / Remarks:

Conducted by Reviewed by

Name & Signature Department Head HR Head


Date: Date: Date:

FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – DIVISION OF LANAO DEL NORTE

TRAINING RECORD
ID No. : Position : T-I
Group / Page of
Name : EVELYN G. MAGSAYO
Area:
TRAINING CERTIFICATE?
# TRAINING / AWARENESS TITLE TRAINER REMARKS
DATE(S) (Y/N)
District In-service Training the Unified of
Work on Learning Competencies in Rolando P. Bravo Nov. 23, 2018 Y
Mathematics

FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – DIVISION OF LANAO DEL NORTE

TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION


District In-Service Training for the Unified Budget of Work Training
Training Title : : Nov. 23, 2018
on Learning Competencies in Mathematics Date(s)
Trainee : JAY-ANN T. ALEGADO Trainer : Rolando P. Bravo
Objective of Training: Making of Unified Budget of Work on Learning Competencies in Mathematics

5 - Much better | 4 - Little better | 3 - The same | 2 - Little Worse | 1 - Much Worse
IMPROVEMENT RATING
# CRITERIA COMMENTS / REMARKS
5 4 3 2 1
Trainee’s Evaluation (to be conducted right after the training)
1. Did the course enhance your knowledge /
skill? /
Give specific examples of knowledge or
skill:
2. To what extent have you been able to apply /
the knowledge / skills gained from this
course?
3. Did this course have aspects which proved /
to be of most value to you in your work?
Please specify:
4. Did this course help you in improving your /
process or the way you handle your tasks?
Give specific example of improved results:
5. Do you feel that the objectives were met? /
6. Are there any aspects of the course that /
you now feel should have been handled
differently?
Immediate Superior’s Evaluation Planned Date Of Evaluation: 30 days/ 60 days /
90 days
1. Did the course enhance your staff’s
knowledge / skill? Give specific examples of
knowledge or skill:
2. To what extent has your staff been able to
apply the knowledge / skills gained from
this course?
3. Did this course have aspects which proved
to be of most value to the work of your
staff? Please specify:
4. Did this course help you in improving your
process or the way you handle your tasks?
Give specific example of improved results:
5. Do you feel that the objectives were met?
6. Are there any aspects of the course that
you now feel should have been handled
differently?

Done by:
Trainee’s Rating
Superior’s Rating
Trainee’s Signature / Date Superior’s Name & Signature /
Overall Rating
Date

Action Items (if any):

FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – DIVISION OF LANAO DEL NORTE

TRAINING NEEDS ANALYSIS


Year: Control No.:
PERSONNEL AND JOB INFORMATION
Name: JAY-ANN T. ALEGADO Department: DepED

Position: T-I Date Hired: 07/09/2018 No. of Years/Mos in Position: 5 mos

Job Function
Summary:

*Legend: Priority: UN – Urgently Needed; LN – Lightly Needed; NN – Not Needed


Competence Level: NB – No Basic Knowledge; NLD – Needs Lot of Development; NSD – Need Some Development; WD – Well Developed

ANALYSIS
Priority Competence Level
Competency (UN / LN /
NB NLD NSD WD
NN)
I. Knowledge

1. Seizes more opportunities than others /

2. Not fearful of acting with a minimum of planning /

3. Strategic thinker /

4. Participates in updating of office vision, mission /

5. Mandates and strategies based on DepEd strategies and direction /

II. Skills (technical and soft)

1. Enjoys working hard /

2. Builds team spirit /

3. Transacts with transparency /

4. Gets things done on time and optimum use of resources /

5.
III. Attitude (behavioral)

1. Sets personal goals and directions, needs & development /


Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for/and is challenged
2. /
by higher goals
Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking
3. /
into account the impact of his/her actions and decisions
4.
5.
Additional Comments / Remarks:

Conducted by Reviewed by

Name & Signature Department Head HR Head


Date: Date: Date:

FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – DIVISION OF LANAO DEL NORTE

TRAINING RECORD
ID No. : Position : T-I
Group / Page of
Name : JAY-ANN T. ALEGADO
Area:
TRAINING CERTIFICATE?
# TRAINING / AWARENESS TITLE TRAINER REMARKS
DATE(S) (Y/N)
District In-service Training the Unified of
Work on Learning Competencies in Rolando P. Bravo Nov. 23, 2018 Y
Mathematics

FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – DIVISION OF LANAO DEL NORTE

TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION


District In-Service Training for the Unified Budget of Work Training
Training Title : : Nov. 23, 2018
on Learning Competencies in Mathematics Date(s)
Trainee : ZANDRA D. PANAL Trainer : Rolando P. Bravo
Objective of Training: Making of Unified Budget of Work on Learning Competencies in Mathematics

5 - Much better | 4 - Little better | 3 - The same | 2 - Little Worse | 1 - Much Worse
IMPROVEMENT RATING
# CRITERIA COMMENTS / REMARKS
5 4 3 2 1
Trainee’s Evaluation (to be conducted right after the training)
1. Did the course enhance your knowledge /
skill? Yes /
Give specific examples of knowledge or
skill:
2. To what extent have you been able to apply
the knowledge / skills gained from this Making the budget by grading period /
course?
3. Did this course have aspects which proved Yes. Easy to teach and the teacher guided by /
to be of most value to you in your work? her lesson
Please specify:
4. Did this course help you in improving your
process or the way you handle your tasks?
Give specific example of improved results:
5. Do you feel that the objectives were met? Yes /
6. Are there any aspects of the course that Lacking of time /
you now feel should have been handled
differently?
Immediate Superior’s Evaluation Planned Date Of Evaluation: 30 days/ 60 days /
90 days
1. Did the course enhance your staff’s
knowledge / skill? Give specific examples of
knowledge or skill:
2. To what extent has your staff been able to
apply the knowledge / skills gained from
this course?
3. Did this course have aspects which proved
to be of most value to the work of your
staff? Please specify:
4. Did this course help you in improving your
process or the way you handle your tasks?
Give specific example of improved results:
5. Do you feel that the objectives were met?
6. Are there any aspects of the course that
you now feel should have been handled
differently?

Done by:
Trainee’s Rating
Superior’s Rating
Trainee’s Signature / Date Superior’s Name & Signature /
Overall Rating
Date

Action Items (if any):

FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – DIVISION OF LANAO DEL NORTE

TRAINING NEEDS ANALYSIS


Year: Control No.:
PERSONNEL AND JOB INFORMATION
Name: ZANDRA D. PANAL Department: DepED

Position: T-I Date Hired: 09/26/2013 No. of Years/Mos in Position:

Job Function
Summary:

*Legend: Priority: UN – Urgently Needed; LN – Lightly Needed; NN – Not Needed


Competence Level: NB – No Basic Knowledge; NLD – Needs Lot of Development; NSD – Need Some Development; WD – Well Developed

ANALYSIS
Priority Competence Level
Competency (UN / LN /
NB NLD NSD WD
NN)
I. Knowledge

1. Set personal goals direction, needs & development /

2.
3.
4.
5.
II. Skills (technical and soft)
Expresses a desire to do better & may express frustration at
1. /
waste of inefficiency
2.
3.
4.
5.
III. Attitude (behavioral)
Maintains a professional image being trustworthy, regularity of
1. /
attendance & punctuality.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Additional Comments / Remarks:

Conducted by Reviewed by

Name & Signature Department Head HR Head


Date: Date: Date:

FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – DIVISION OF LANAO DEL NORTE

TRAINING RECORD
ID No. : Position : T-I
Group / Page of
Name : ZANDRA D. PANAL
Area:
TRAINING CERTIFICATE?
# TRAINING / AWARENESS TITLE TRAINER REMARKS
DATE(S) (Y/N)
District In-service Training the Unified of
Work on Learning Competencies in Rolando P. Bravo Nov. 23, 2018 Y
Mathematics

FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – DIVISION OF LANAO DEL NORTE

TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION


District In-Service Training for the Unified Budget of Work Training
Training Title : : Nov. 23, 2018
on Learning Competencies in Mathematics Date(s)
Trainee : ROSALINA P. OLOFERNES Trainer : Rolando P. Bravo
Objective of Training: Making of Unified Budget of Work on Learning Competencies in Mathematics

5 - Much better | 4 - Little better | 3 - The same | 2 - Little Worse | 1 - Much Worse
IMPROVEMENT RATING
# CRITERIA COMMENTS / REMARKS
5 4 3 2 1
Trainee’s Evaluation (to be conducted right after the training)
1. Did the course enhance your knowledge /
skill? Self-Management /
Give specific examples of knowledge or
skill:
2. To what extent have you been able to apply /
the knowledge / skills gained from this
course?
3. Did this course have aspects which proved Improves systems and help others improve /
to be of most value to you in your work? their effectiveness
Please specify:
4. Did this course help you in improving your Priorities work tasks and students /
process or the way you handle your tasks?
Give specific example of improved results:
5. Do you feel that the objectives were met? /
6. Are there any aspects of the course that /
you now feel should have been handled
differently?
Immediate Superior’s Evaluation Planned Date Of Evaluation: 30 days/ 60 days /
90 days
1. Did the course enhance your staff’s
knowledge / skill? Give specific examples of
knowledge or skill:
2. To what extent has your staff been able to
apply the knowledge / skills gained from
this course?
3. Did this course have aspects which proved
to be of most value to the work of your
staff? Please specify:
4. Did this course help you in improving your
process or the way you handle your tasks?
Give specific example of improved results:
5. Do you feel that the objectives were met?
6. Are there any aspects of the course that
you now feel should have been handled
differently?

Done by:
Trainee’s Rating
Superior’s Rating
Trainee’s Signature / Date Superior’s Name & Signature /
Overall Rating
Date

Action Items (if any):

FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – DIVISION OF LANAO DEL NORTE

TRAINING NEEDS ANALYSIS


Year: Control No.:
PERSONNEL AND JOB INFORMATION
Name: ROSALINA P. OLOFERNES Department: DepED

Position: T-I Date Hired: 07/30/1999 No. of Years/Mos in Position: 19

Job Function
Summary:

*Legend: Priority: UN – Urgently Needed; LN – Lightly Needed; NN – Not Needed


Competence Level: NB – No Basic Knowledge; NLD – Needs Lot of Development; NSD – Need Some Development; WD – Well Developed

ANALYSIS
Priority Competence Level
Competency (UN / LN /
NB NLD NSD WD
NN)
I. Knowledge

1. Prioritize work tasks and schedules to achieve goals /

2. Strategic thinker /

3.
4.
5.
II. Skills (technical and soft)
Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to
1. /
standard operating procedures correctly
2. Enjoys working hard /

3.
4.
5.
III. Attitude (behavioral)
Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the
1. organizations’ needs, improve systems and help improve their /
effectiveness.
Display emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged
2.
by higher goals.
3.
4.
5.
Additional Comments / Remarks:

Conducted by Reviewed by

Name & Signature Department Head HR Head


Date: Date: Date:

FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – DIVISION OF LANAO DEL NORTE

TRAINING RECORD
ID No. : Position : T-I
Group / Page of
Name : ROSALINA P. OLOFERNES
Area:
TRAINING CERTIFICATE?
# TRAINING / AWARENESS TITLE TRAINER REMARKS
DATE(S) (Y/N)
District In-service Training the Unified of
Work on Learning Competencies in Rolando P. Bravo Nov. 23, 2018 Y
Mathematics

FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18
FM-HRM-06 00 09-03-18