0 views

- Full Cumming Error Estandar
- 31.Data Inferences
- 7-Estimation and Sample Size Determination Tutorial q
- BUS3026W_OBJ5_MEMO
- IE27_19_HypothesisTestingOnTwoSamples
- Ntc Project: s06-Ns02 1
- 1999 1
- Statistik Soal
- Relationship Between Dental Caries and Nutritional Status
- 2 - 12 - Lecture 4C- Variance Properties and Sample Variance (22-15)
- BroadieCao_Sept2008
- Data analysis lecture
- Jekel
- Central Limit Theorem
- Applied Probability and Statistics model question paper (1).docx
- Quantitative Methods for Managers
- Error Bars in Experimental Biology
- 3-2 F Baumeister Presentation Homogeneity in EQA
- Uji t Dua Sampel Bebas (Tidak Berpasangan)
- Lecture 2

You are on page 1of 4

This is a case for testing two population proportions. Here, two groups in the

form of large independent samples (with a common characteristic – a headache

in this case) are being compared: The Viagra group and the placebo group. Let

the Viagra group be the first group and the placebo group be the second group.

Hence, n1 = 734 and n2 =725.

experienced headaches for the Viagra group) and p̂2 (proportion of subjectswho

experienced headaches for the placebo group).

headaches) / (total number in viagra group + total number in placebo group)

p̂ = 0.10

1 1

Standard error = √p̂ (1 − p̂) ∗ [( ) + ( )] =

n1 n2

1 1

√0.10 (1 − 0.10) ∗ [( ) + (725)] = √0.09 ∗ [0.001362 + 0.0013793] =

734

Difference between the two sample proportions = p̂1 - p̂2 = 0.16 – 0.04 = 0.12

The null hypothesis states that the two population proportions are equal (the rate

of occurrence of a headache is the same among the Viagra and placebo groups) :

H0 : p̂1 = p̂2

The alternative hypothesis states that the two population proportions are

unequal (in this case, the rate of occurrence of a headache is more among the

Viagra in comparison to the placebo groups) : H0 : p̂1 > p̂2

The test statistic (denoted as z) for testing the difference between two

population proportions is

𝑛1

1

) + (𝑛 )]

2

proportions involves computing the difference between the two population

proportions plus or minus the Margin of Error.

The table value of the z-score for the 99% confidence level is 2.58

ztable = 2.58

[p (1−p )]

1 + [p2 (1−p2 )]

̂ ̂ ̂ ̂

Margin of Error = 𝑧 ∗ √ 1

𝑛1 𝑛2

[0.16(0.84)]

= 2.58 ∗ √

734

+ [0.04725

(0.96)]

The formula for the 99% confidence interval is (p̂1 - p̂2) ± Margin of Error

The p-value is the chance (expressed in percentage terms) of being to the right

of the value of the test statistic (which was 7.6) which is 100% - 99% = 1% =

0.01

2.

This is a case for testing of the difference of means. Here, there are two groups

in the form of small independent samples: The filtered king size cigarettes and

the non-filtered king size cigarettes . Assume that these small independent

samples have been drawn from normal populations, with means µx (population

mean for filtered cigarettes) and µy (population mean for non-filtered cigarettes)

Let the filtered cigarettes be the first group and the non-filtered cigarettes group

be the second group. Hence, n1 = n2 =6

Sample mean for the first group = ȳ = (1+1+2+1+1+1)/ 6 = 1.167

Standard deviation for second group = s2 = 0.40

Let µx = population mean for filtered cigarettes

The null hypothesis H0 states that the small independent samples have been

drawn from normal populations, with same means, that is µx = µy and that the

population variances are equal (σX2 = σy2). The alternative hypothesis H1 states that the

population means are not equal, that is µx ≠µy. The formula for the test statistic t is based

on the equal population variances assumption.

Before computing the test statistic, we need to test whether the two

independent samples have been drawn from normal populations with

the same variance σ2 . Under the null hypothesis, the population

variances are equal - σX2 = σy2 = σ2.The alternative hypothesis is that the

population variances are unequal -> σX2 ≠ σy2

The calculated F statistic is given by: F = sx2 / sy2

Where sx2 and sy2 are unbiased estimates of the common population variance σ2

The F statistic follows the F-distribution with [(n1 – 1), (n2 – 1)] degrees

of freedom = [5,5] degrees of freedom. The level of significance is α/2 = 0.05/2

= 0.025

The critical F value from the table, for α/2 = 0.025 and (5,5) degrees of freedom

is 7.15.

The calculated value is less than the critical table value (1.67 < 7.15). So, we

can conclude that the population variances are equal.

The formula for the test statistic is:

1 1

t = (x̅ - ȳ) / S√𝑛 + 𝑛

1 2

population variance σ2

S= √ = 0.47

𝑛1 + 𝑛2 −2

- Full Cumming Error EstandarUploaded byliabiol
- 31.Data InferencesUploaded byEnrique Fabian Cardenas
- 7-Estimation and Sample Size Determination Tutorial qUploaded byabdul
- BUS3026W_OBJ5_MEMOUploaded byapi-3708231
- IE27_19_HypothesisTestingOnTwoSamplesUploaded byCristina de los Reyes
- Ntc Project: s06-Ns02 1Uploaded by313silence
- 1999 1Uploaded bySaravanan Sanacey
- Statistik SoalUploaded byjoslinmtggmailcom
- Relationship Between Dental Caries and Nutritional StatusUploaded byWendi Junaedi
- 2 - 12 - Lecture 4C- Variance Properties and Sample Variance (22-15)Uploaded bybablinayaki
- BroadieCao_Sept2008Uploaded byAakash Khandelwal
- Data analysis lectureUploaded byC Donis
- JekelUploaded bydekaerfiana
- Central Limit TheoremUploaded byNikhil Thapar
- Applied Probability and Statistics model question paper (1).docxUploaded bySHANMUGAMK
- Quantitative Methods for ManagersUploaded byLuke Shaw
- Error Bars in Experimental BiologyUploaded byEsliMoralesRechy
- 3-2 F Baumeister Presentation Homogeneity in EQAUploaded byAkma Din
- Uji t Dua Sampel Bebas (Tidak Berpasangan)Uploaded byCut Raihanah
- Lecture 2Uploaded bysdklsjdflkajs
- Hasil Analisis HotellingUploaded byhusni
- PMP Course Material 1 EZ_Dump.pdfUploaded byAmritanshu Ranjan
- 9) 20.12.17 critical value.docxUploaded byqwertyuiop
- Labor StandardsUploaded byIlyana Sahira Murizan
- Good Practices in Free-Energy CalculationsUploaded byMilton Paredes Avalos
- 7_c_annex_quant_qc.pdfUploaded byHaw
- Excel for Business Statistics AnalysisUploaded bykuala88
- f5_2013_jun_qUploaded byDeepika Kresh
- Assignment #3Uploaded byRakesh Singh
- PVR Ltd.Uploaded bykhushbu golani

- Next InstalmentUploaded byPreetha Rajan
- Hypothesis TestsUploaded byPreetha Rajan
- GEX Data Insights Documentation Final.docxUploaded byPreetha Rajan
- ML UCI DatasetUploaded byPreetha Rajan
- 2171941Uploaded byPreetha Rajan
- Chaudhuri Sbai NZEPUploaded byPreetha Rajan
- Workbook.numbers and Negative NumbersUploaded byPreetha Rajan
- Data Exploration and PreparationUploaded byPreetha Rajan
- Ch10.WilcoxonUploaded byHarold Maglalang
- TitanicUploaded byPreetha Rajan
- Introduction to Machine Learning - WikipediaUploaded byAnonymous nfkeFR
- General Challenge 1Uploaded byPreetha Rajan
- 10.1.1.950.3438Uploaded byPreetha Rajan
- MetricsUploaded byPreetha Rajan
- Log Models 2Uploaded bybabutu123
- Lecture 24 - Index Heirachy.htmlUploaded byPreetha Rajan
- AssignmentUploaded byPreetha Rajan
- Brain Development in the Early YearsUploaded byshobharajan
- Trust Game Knack KeeferUploaded byPreetha Rajan
- Trust Game CoxUploaded byPreetha Rajan
- Does Fairness Prevent Market ClearingUploaded byPreetha Rajan
- 40750456Uploaded byPreetha Rajan
- Lecture 15 Target Zones (Krugman Paper)Uploaded byPreetha Rajan
- Lecture 14 Real Effects of Financial IntermediationUploaded byPreetha Rajan
- Lecture 10 Currency Crisis (Part 3)Uploaded byPreetha Rajan
- Lecture 8 Currency Crises (Part 1)Uploaded byPreetha Rajan
- Lecture 7 Moral Hazard in International LendingUploaded byPreetha Rajan
- Lecture 6 Debt Forgiveness and Moral Hazard in International LendingUploaded byPreetha Rajan
- Lecture 5 Sovereign RiskUploaded byPreetha Rajan

- comedy of humour.docxUploaded byAdeel Raza
- (eBook PDF) Mathematics - Chaos TheoryUploaded byMichael B. Vincent
- Econometrics finalUploaded byDanikaLi
- TAYL06-168-202Uploaded byorion20
- Heide 2012Uploaded bydsfdfdsfsf
- abcUploaded byGeHan ChoPade
- Rm 9Uploaded byAshish Aguiar
- Ward–Takahashi identityUploaded byrr1819
- Summary EconometricsUploaded byFatimah Ahmad
- Goodness of FitUploaded bykushuiitk
- physics-formulaeUploaded byAndrei Stoica
- Quantum Mechanics II - Homework 10Uploaded byAle Gomez
- MomentumSpace.pdfUploaded byMadhav Mohan
- 20_LinearRegressionUploaded byRose Lee
- Inflation, Dark Energy, and Dark Matter.pdfUploaded byluitnoi
- QuanticaUploaded byOourdory Fernandes
- Stock and Watson - Slides for Chapter 4Uploaded byBruno Capuzzi
- Attitude Towards RiskUploaded byOrestis :. Konstantinidis
- Advanced Solid State Physics by Philip Phillips PpUploaded bySubhadip Pal
- 002. Thomas-Fermi MethodUploaded bymuhammad soenarto
- ELS-Cosmological Theories on the Origin of the UniverseUploaded byLyn Fanuga Navarro
- Bob Knowlton Case AnalysisUploaded byRachelle Brott
- ExercisesUploaded byAdm Foto Mahnitese
- Flowchart 2Uploaded byJordan Belke
- Introduction to Condensed Matter PhysicsUploaded byPhysicist91
- entrvista fermi.pdfUploaded byjuan
- To determine whether if acceleration of body A increases as the mass of body B increases.Uploaded byKevin Surajbally
- Quantum Theory of GrapheneUploaded byAditya Chanda
- deterministic chaos in general relativity.pdfUploaded byPriti Gupta
- T-test for Correlated SampleUploaded byElijah Liu