Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In this Report, the Economies of Norway, USA and Singapore will be covered. Key indicators,
key economic questions and how their economic systems will be discussed. Each country
will be introduced by their individual economic systems. It will be concluded with a compare
and contrast report of the three different economies.
Student: Meera
Since 1994, Norway has not been a part of the European Union (EU). However, they are still part of
the European Economic Area and largely contribute to the EU’s Budget. Norway follows what we call
a “mixed economy” with an active private sector but also a large influential state sector (Norway).
2. What characteristics of a planned economy and free market does Norway use and how are
key economic questions answered?
A planned economy, also known as a command economy is where the government controls the
productions and pricing of goods and services. Whereas, a free market, is constructed on the
potential of supply and demand, with minimal or zero government interference. The Norwegian
economy is a well-developed mixed economy – a free market economy with a large component of
state influence in strategic areas.
The growth of Norway’s industry has largely depended on the private sector as the industrial sector is
primarily under private ownership. Agriculture and fisheries are also mainly owned by the private
sector, apart from the 10% of productive forestry land which is owned by the state. Nevertheless,
Norway’s biggest petroleum/oil corporations such as Statoil and Norsk Hydro are largely under state
ownership. Their public sector is one of the biggest in the world as a percentage of their GDP. The
state also has a significant share in the ownership of hydropower stations and electricity plants.
Taxation, duties and subsidies come within the purview of state administration. They also manage
licensing plans and different aspects such as the work environment, accounting procedures, pollution
and products. However, in the 1990’s, ownership of the state industry shifted their focus on financial
investments. However, the Norwegian government is slowly reducing state ownership in most
companies to stay with the global trend of deregulating and privatizing state-owned companies. As a
result, the previously owned state companies which were near monopolies are now being subjected
to competitive pressure. Also, to combat pressure on the country’s GDP which as a heavy
contribution from the oil sector, the Norwegian government is trying to focus on other industries to
avoid any problems that may be brought on by reduction in world oil prices or demand (The
Norwegian Mixed Economy).
Norway’s GDP amounted to $379.5 billion in 2017 which is well on its way to recovery after the sharp
drop in 2015 due to beaten down oil prices (Norway Economy Profile). In percentage terms, the GDP
growth was about 1.5% in 2017 and this was mainly due to domestic demand which in turn was
pushed up due to higher employment rates and friendly tax policies of the government. Going ahead
the economy is expected
to either remain constant
or improve slowly. In
terms of sector
contribution, more than
66% of the total GDP
comes from the services
sector of which 20% is
government owned. The
industry and agriculture
sector contribute 31.1%
and 2.4%. Since Norway
is amongst the top 5 Figure 2: GDP trend from 2009-2017 for Norway (Norway)
exporters of crude oil
globally, 22% of its GDP comes from oil and gas trade (this accounts for 67% of Norwegian exports).
The economy of Norway is mostly driven by the production and extraction of North Sea oil (Norway
Economy 2019).
The top imports to Norway come from Figure 4: Norway's Top 5 Import Origins (shown in
Sweden (12%) with a value of $10.1 percentage)(Kapoor)
billion, Germany (11%) with a value of
$9.6 billion, China (9.6%) with a value of
$8.17 billion, South Korea (6.7%) with a value of $5.71 billion and the United States (6.5%) with a
value of $5.5 billion. Cars make up 7.4% of Norway’s imports, with other significant imports being iron
structures (4.8%), refined petroleum (2.7%), broadcasting equipment (2.0%), packaged medicaments
(1.9%) and furniture (1.3%) (Norway OEC). Norway export more than they import, resulting in their
positive trade balance of $21.2 billion.
6. Income inequality
Income inequality in a country the uneven distribution of income across various working and non-
working classes of the total population. A statistical measure was developed by an Italian statistician
to measure economic inequality and is referred to as the Gini coefficient. It can range from 0-1 or 0%-
100%,
representing
equality and
inequality.
Hence, a
coefficient that is
closer to 0 is
desirable as it
represents less
inequality
(Kenton).
The statistics
agency of
Norway has Figure 5: Income inequality trend from 2004-2016 for Norway (Norway- Gini Index)
highlighted that
income
inequality in Norway is growing and the gap is more in the public sector than in the private sector.
One of the reasons for this, is that the salaries for top executive business men have increased
tremendously. Higher wages are almost four times more than lower wages for 37.5 hours per week (a
standard work week in Norway). Over the last two decades, the salary gap in Norway has increased
faster compared to other OECD (Organization for Economic cooperation and development) countries.
In 1997, the top 10% salary earners had 2.8 times more than the ones in the lowest 10% salary
earners. However, by 2017 this difference increased to 3.8 times. The public-sector Gini coefficient
from 2008-2017 increased by 21.4% as compared to 7.7% over the same decade. The Gini index for
2016 was 27.5, the most it’s been in 10 years (Bazilchuck).
7. Inflation
Inflation is an indication of increase in the prices of goods and services consumed by an economy. In
Norway, the average inflation rate has hovered around the 3% mark over the last 60 years. Currently,
the inflation rate is around 3.1% (as of January 2019), which exceeds Norges Bank’s target rate of
2.0%. This is because prices for food, beverages, tobacco, housing, water, electricity and gas all
increased. However, compared to the end of 2018, consumer prices took a fall of 0.5% in January
2019. The main cause for this drop, was the decline in the prices of clothing and footwear. In the
future, the inflation rate in Norway is expected to go down to 1.9% in 2020, according to Trading
Economics
(focuseconomics).
Figure 6: Inflation rate trend in 2018 and 2019 for Norway (Norway Inflation Rate)
8. Taxation system
In 2007/2008, the global economy went into a recession triggered by the US economy’s housing
market crash. However, the Norwegian economy experienced a somewhat moderate decline in their
economy compared to other European economies and especially compared to the American
economy. The GDP of Norway (excluding petroleum contribution) decreased by 1% in the first quarter
of 2009 and 0.8% in the last quarter of 2008 as compared to the U.S which contracted by 6.1% in the
first quarter of 2009. The reason that the effect of the global recession on Norway was muted is
because of its gains from its oil and natural gas sector through direct taxes as well as from the
investments it receives for its petroleum projects. The country had done well by saving and
strengthening its sovereign fund. However, private sector business investments did get affected due
to higher interest rates and lesser availability of loans (Saltmarsh).
Work cited:
Bazilchuck , Nancy. “Strong Increase in Norwegian Pay Gap.” Science Nordic, 5 Jan. 2019,
sciencenordic.com/strong-increase-norwegian-pay-gap.
Black, Simon. “Why Norway Is a BS Argument for Higher Taxes.” Sovereign Man, 15 June
2017, www.sovereignman.com/lifestyle-design/why-norway-is-a-bs-argument-for-
higher-taxes-8235/.
Pines, Lawrence. “Norway's Top Commodity Imports & Exports.” Commodity.com, 28 Sept.
2018, commodity.com/norway/#More_Information_on_Norways_ImportsExports.
Saltmarsh, Matthew. “Norway Slides Into
Recession.” The New York Times, 19
May 2009,
www.nytimes.com/2009/05/20/business/global/20kroner.html.
Figures:
Figure 1: Spannknebel, Dieter. “Shape And Ensign Of Norway On A Globe .” Photos.com by Getty Images,
photos.com/featured/shape-and-ensign-of-norway-on-a-globe-dieter-spannknebel.html?product=wood-print.
Figure 3: Ministry of Petroleum and Energy. “Gas Exports from the Norwegian Shelf.” Government.no,
www.regjeringen.no/en/topics/energy/oil-and-gas/Gas-exports-from-the-Norwegian-shelf/id766092/.
Key Statistics:
What are the goods and services and how much of each do they have to produce?
How to produce them?
For whom do they produce?
Who owns and controls the factors of the production?
What are the goods and services and how much of each do they have to produce?
In the U.S most of the goods and services are produced by privately owned firms. Many of the
firms if they are successful earn profits for their owners, they obtain the possibility of losing
money if the firm tries to sell the product and it is not purchased by the consumers at prices that
will be able to cover the costs of the productions. Most of the businesses within the U.S work
under at least one of these contractual modes: partnerships, corporations and sole
proprietorships. The United States in 2017 exported over $2.3 trillion worth in goods and
services (Amadeo). It is possible for the United States to be able to export a lot more goods and
services because only one percent of America’s businesses export. Capital merchandise square
measure the foremost fortunate export class. That’s because of U.S based firms perceive the
wants of different transnational corporations. Of the $533 billion in capital merchandise
exported, sixty-four p.c is from six classes (Amadeo).
Figure 2: Exports and products produced in the U.S (Ecealptunaer)
Inflation rates:
This data point shows the annual rate of
inflation within the U.S from 2010-2017 with
further prolongations up to 2023. The
information represents U.S town averages. The
bottom amount was 1982-10984. In economic
science, the rate of inflation may be a
mensuration of inflation, the speed of growth
of an indicator. It’s the proportion ate of
modification in costs level over time. The speed
of decrease within the buying power of cash is
close to equal. In keeping with the forecast, costs can increase be 1.62% in 2017. If there is a big
drop of the inflation in a country it can be dangerous to the economy of the country because if it
is to get lower it can decrease the population’s
purchasing power (U.S). Figure 4: Graph of inflation rate (U.S)
Income inequality:
In the U.S it is said that the rich are continuing to get richer and the poor and continuing to get
poorer. The U. S’s Gini index is 41.5 which was recorded in 2016. In the U.S the place with the
most income inequality is New York but income inequality is widely spread across the whole of
the U.S. Income inequality went downhill from the Great Depression. Every state declined the
share of income that was controlled by the top five percent (Reinicke).
Taxation system:
The taxation system in the U.S both federal
level and state level. The U.S taxation system
is known to be quite complexed. There are
many different types of taxes which are sales,
income, capital gain, etc. Income tax is
maybe one in all the foremost renowned types of taxation. If anyone is to earn financial gain
within the U.S they’ll see the deductions on your bank check. Everyone within the World Health
Organization earns financial gain within the U.S
is meant to pay revenue enhancement on each Figure 5: (“LibGuides”)
the federal and state level. Another very popular form of tax is sales tax, this is when you are to
purchase something there will be an added amount to what you buy. In certain parts of the U.S
some items have tax and some don’t but it’s according to the state.
Work-cited:
Amadeo, Kimberly. “What Will the Economy Do in 2019 and Beyond?” The Balance Small
Business, The Balance, www.thebalance.com/us-economic-outlook-3305669.
Amadeo, Kimberly. “Why Isn't America the World's Largest Exporter?” The Balance Small
Business, The Balance, www.thebalance.com/u-s-exports-top-categories-challenges-
opportunities-3306282.
Ecealptunaer. “The Four Basic Economic Questions Are 1 What Goods and Services and
How Much Of.” The Logistic Model Has Good and Bad Features PROS CONS
Mathematically Tractable, College Life, www.coursehero.com/file/p7vmd0f/The-four-
basic-economic-questions-are-1-what-goods-and-services-and-how-much-of/.
Filtration Sterilization,
www.rpi.edu/dept/advising/free_enterprise/us_government/taxation.htm.
“LibGuides: Financial Crisis of 2008: Treasury & Fed.” Sustainable Design Principles -
Sustainable Product Design - LibGuides at University of Illinois at Urbana-
Champaign, guides.library.illinois.edu/c.php?g=347931&p=2345515.
Overview.", "The U.S. Economy: Historical. “The U.S. Economy: Historical Overview.” The
Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th Ed, Encyclopedia.com, 2019,
www.encyclopedia.com/economics/economics-magazines/us-economy-historical-
overview.
Pintura Del Alto Renacimiento,
www.voyagesphotosmanu.com/factors_of_production_US.html.
Reinicke, Carmen. “In the US, the Rich Are Getting Richer and the Poor Are Getting Poorer,
Study Concludes.” CNBC, CNBC, 19 July 2018, www.cnbc.com/2018/07/19/income-
inequality-continues-to-grow-in-the-united-states.html.
Ross, Sean. “Is the United States a Market Economy or a Mixed Economy?” Investopedia,
Investopedia, 15 June 2018, www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/031815/united-states-
considered-market-economy-or-mixed-economy.asp.
Introduction
The Singaporean Government has three parts; the Executive, the Judiciary and
the Legislature. The Judiciary explains the law through the Courts, the
Legislature makes the laws of the land and the Executive manages the law
(Parliament.gov.sg). The Singaporean people do decide what they want to
make or build, but the Government has a final say and certain objectives that
the business/etc, needs to meet to be able to start their business and/ or sell
their product.
If for example you want to build a school, the Singaporean government will
allow you to do so but they do get involved. The government sets targets for
your school to meet by a certain year. For example, the government sets a goal
that your school must have at least 2000 students by 2020 or must get 500
new applications for new students.
Sanctions
Sanctions is a method of how the government restricts themselves from
trading or having any relations with certain countries. Singapore doesn’t have
any sanctions. Singapore trades with many countries globally and so they don’t
need any restrictions.
Export destinations
Figure 3: Singapore Export Destinations (Atlas.media)
Singapore’s main export destinations are Hong Kong (19%), China (16%),
Malaysia (8.9%) and Indonesia (5.6%).
Import Origins
Population:
5,638.7 million people (Singstat.gov)
GNI:
$508.3 billion PPP dollars (Data.worldbank)
Inflation rate:
The inflation rate decreased to 0.4% in January from 0.5% in December.
Continuing in 2019, the expectations for the core inflation is set at 1.5% to
2.5% and expect the inflation rate to average to 1.2% and 1.4% in 2020. At the
moment Singapore has an inflation rate of 0.4%, which can be looked at as
being good and bad. The reason for this, is that a stable and good inflation rate
usually varies from 1.8% to 3%. This shows that the country has a stable
economy. But Singapore has a very stable economy so having 0.4% is good for
the Singaporean economy and shows that the prices are slowly increasing each
year (Focus-economics.com).
Unemployment rate:
Figure 5: Unemployment rate in Singapore (Statista)
The graph above figure 5, shows the unemployment rate in Singapore from
2007 until 2017. In 2017, the unemployment rate was at 2.02%. The
unemployment rate in 2019 is at 2.20%. It increased from 2.10% in the fourth
quarter of 2018 (Tradingeconomics).
Employment rate:
1.2% (Statista)
Income inequality
The gap between the richest and the poorest people in Singapore is widening.
In 2007, the monthly income of the richest 10% grew from $8,571 to $13,215
in 2017. But the monthly income of the poorest 10% grew by $219 in the same
amount of time. The income gap grew by 54% in 2017. However, the lowest
income groups experienced the fastest growing income in percentage terms.
Lowest-income earners experienced 65%-77% growth since 2007, while the
highest 40% experienced 54%-70%. As seen in figure 6 below the lowest
income earner groups have a higher percentage than the highest groups
(Theonlinecitizen.com). The income inequality has affected the poorest and
richest groups differently. The richest groups experienced an increase in their
wage in dollars, whereas the poorest groups experienced an increase in their
wage in percentage wise.
The Singaporean government has helped constrain the income inequality, with
government taxes and transfers. The 90/10 income inequality ratio reduces
significantly when including the transfers and taxes, the income inequality
ratio measures inequality by analyzing the income of the poorest and richest
10% of a nation (Theonlinecitizen.com).
Singapore has a Gini index of 0.459, which means their income inequality
stands relatively in the middle (Seow, Joanna).
Channelnewsasia. "Singapore Sovereign Fund GIC Says It Pared UBS Stake at a Loss."
Channel News Asia, 16 May 2017, Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.. Accessed
13 Mar. 2019.
Indexmundi. "Singapore Economy - Overview." Index Mundi, 20 Jan. 2018, Error! Hyperlink
reference not valid.. Accessed 25 Feb. 2019.
Iras.gov.sg. "The Singapore Tax System." Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore, 19 Feb.
2019, Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.. Accessed 8 Mar. 2019.
Lkyspp.nus. "Singapore's Approach to Managing Economic Crises." Lee Kuan Yew School of
Public Policy, lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/case-
studies/singapores_approach_to_managing_economic_crises_22052018_lowres.pdf?s
fvrsn=7387660a_0. Accessed 4 Mar. 2019.
Min, Chia Yan. "Singapore Still 2nd Freest Economy in the World but Gap with Top-ranked
Hong Kong Widens." The Straitstimes [Singapore], 5 Feb. 2018. The Straitstimes,
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.. Accessed 27 Feb. 2019.
Workman, Daniel. "Singapore's Top Trading Partners." World Top Exports, Error! Hyperlink
reference not valid.. Accessed 4 Mar. 2019.
Figure 1+2+3+4:
Atlas.media. Singapore. OEC, atlas.media.mit.edu/en/profile/country/sgp/. Accessed 4 Mar.
2019.
Figure 5:
Statista. Singapore: Unemployment Rate from 2007 to 2017. The Statistics Portal, Error!
Hyperlink reference not valid.. Accessed 4 Mar. 2019.
Figure 6:
TheOnlineCitizen.com. "Income Growth by Decile 2007-2017." The Online Citizen.com, 25
July 2018, Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.. Accessed 4 Mar. 2019.
Figure 7:
Iras.gov.sg. Government Operating Expenditure FY2017/18. Inland Revenue Authority of
Singapore, Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.. Accessed 8 Mar. 2019.
Norway, USA and Singapore are three relatively high-income countries with stable
economies. All of which are rated in the top 15 richest countries of the world.
Singapore being the 2nd richest, Norway the 6th and the USA the 12th. Singapore has
a population of 5,638.7 million people with a GDP per capita of US $57,714. 30. USA
has a population of 325.7 million people and a GDP per capita of $59, 531.66 USD.
Whereas Norway having the smallest population of 5.2 million has an impressive and
staggering GDP per capita of US $70,600, compared to Singapore and the US. The
figure above shows the comparison of the three country’s GDP. This report will go
through the different aspects of a command and free-market economy that each
country has implemented/made use of and will evaluate on how it benefits or
detriments the country's economy through all the economic factors.
Norway, Singapore and the USA all have mixed economies in which the government
controls the productions and pricing of goods and services. However, all the
country’s economies have largely depended on the success of private industries.
While the government/ public sectors control some of the bigger companies. Their
main aspects such as labor, land and capital resources are mostly all owned by the
government and the rest are owned by individuals. In Norway 90% of agriculture and
fisheries are owned by individuals whereas in the USA most of their agriculture and
land is owned by the government. In Singapore, the agriculture is also mostly owned
by individuals while the government does have a say.
Singapore has the largest Gini coefficient of 45.9, the US following it with 41.5
and Norway having the lowest coefficient of 27.0. The graph above shows the
income inequality using the Gini index for each country. Unfortunately, for
both Singapore and the USA the gap between the rich and the poor is
widening. The rich are becoming richer and the poor are becoming poorer
through the growth of private businesses and increase in wages. In Singapore,
wages of both the poor and rich are growing by relatively equal amounts, but
because the rich earn a higher income their income is growing a lot more than
the poor. However, even though Norway’s Gini index is the best, it is also said
to be increasing. It is the most it has been in the past 10 years, more over in
the public sector than the private. One of the reasons for this, is that the
salaries for top executive business men have increased tremendously.
Higher wages
are almost four
times more than
lower wages for
a standard work
week in Norway
(37.5 hours) per
week. This
is similar to the
issue Singapore
and the USA are
facing.
Inflation rates
(Meera):
Norway, USA and Singapore are all in the top 50 countries for top exporters
and importers in the world. For exporting, USA is second, Singapore 14th and
Norway being the 30th biggest exporter in the world. In importing, the United
States is the biggest importing country in the world, with Singapore as the
16th largest and Norway as 35th largest as of 2017. USA’s total for exports is
$1.25 trillion USD and $2.16 trillion USD for imports. Compared to the US,
Singapore and Norway’s total is not close to their large numbers but are still
quite high. Singapore has an export total of $321 billion USD and import total
of $294 billion USD, while Norway’s export total is $106 billion USD and import
total is $84.8 billion USD. All three countries have many similarities when it
comes to import and export, because they import and export to some of the
same places and the same products. The destinations that all three countries
have the same are China, Germany, South Korea, but the ones that only two
have in common are, Japan, France, the United Kingdom, Hong Kong and the
Netherlands. With top origins, all countries import from China and Germany,
but only two share the same deal with Japan, the United Kingdom, India, Italy
and Malaysia. Singapore, Norway and USA, all import Refined Petroleum,
broadcasting equipment and office machine parts but only two both export
refined petroleum. In export products, two of the country's export integrated
circuits, packaged medicaments, petroleum gas and crude petroleum. Two of
the countries both import cars, crude petroleum, computers, packaged
medicaments and integrated circuits.
Luckily, for Norway and Singapore the global recession was largely muted.
Nevertheless, they still did experience a somewhat moderate decline in their
economy compared to several other countries. However, in Norway the
private sector did get affected due to higher interest rates and minimal
availability of loans. The rest of Norway was protected by its sovereign fund
and its gains from its oil and natural gas sector through direct taxes as well as
from the investments it receives for its petroleum projects. Singapore was also
fortunate enough to have a large sovereign fund with enough to donate
billions into Western Banks that suffered deep losses due to the financial crisis.
Unfortunately, The Great Depression had a huge impact on the U.S when it
came to the financial crisis in 2008. It started as a mortgage meltdown and
ended in a recession in the U.S. Their response wasn’t legal and it took many
risks that were considered breaking the law. The part of the U.S government
that were the crisis fighters pushed off the arguments and were unfairly
allowing the activity of the ones that were already privileged and many
worried of this unfairness. 8.8 million people lost their jobs and 6 million went
jobless.
Conclusion (ALL):