This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
The four hostages in Kreditbankenrobbery sympathized with their captor Kauai, Hawaii March 18, 2007 - Yesterday I attended the Hawaii People's Fund Media Justice Conference at Kapi`olani Community College in Honolulu Hawaii. The major topic and concern for attendees was the threat of media concentration to democracy. Hawaii media activists, academics, and pioneers who are and have been at the forefront of a very select group of individuals that have some understanding of the primary and fundamental connection between mass media, the diversity of ideas, and democracy were in attendance as participants, presenters and panelists. Chris Conybeare's "Media and the Struggle for Democracy" presentation made it clear to those that had any lingering doubts that the media monopoly predicted by Bagdikian had come home to roost. Sean McLaughlin localized the problem by answering the question "Who owns Hawaii? Answer: Time Warner. I thought to myself, "living in a free market version of a North Korean style state media monopoly is a bad thing." Everyone seemed to think diversity was a good thing. Jay April Akaku's CEO stressed that this diversity included, "ideas in conflict" as a panelist in the workshop "REAL Public Access: Do we Have It?" Real public access do we have it? "No!" I thought to myself. We have sole-sourced, state created and DCCA Cable Television Division controlled non-profits pretending to provide free speech in the form of first-come, nondiscriminatory access. In reality these PEGs historically have been proxies functioning as a cabal to slush resources and services back to government (including education)." Combining Public, Education, and Government services and resources under one PEG roof allows internal shuffling of resources and services back to government and away from the public producer. Of course these PEGs do provide de-minimus services to chosen public producer/presenters and favored nonprofits recipients with the crumbs swept from the multi-million dollar banquet table funded through state mandated cable subscriber monies. These favored public producers are not selected on a first-come, nondiscriminatory basis, but through a filtration process articulated by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky in their classic book "Manufacturing Consent".
The current PEG's differential treatment of public producers into "worthy and unworthy" has an odd sideeffect. The chosen served suffer a Stockholm-like syndrome and become allied with and apologists for there providers (and captors). The few franchised to speak cannot hear their voiceless disenfranchised cousins. They become blind to the disenfranchisement of "unworthy" producers and adopt an attitude best expressed in the words of Native Hawaiian activist Kekuni Blaidsdell, "If someone is a victim - blame them." On the same panel with McLaughlin and April was Larry Geller, a public presenter, and Ruth Hsu a public/producer, and Meredith Nichols `Olelo's outreach coordinator. Akaku under McLaughlin and with the support of some board members (including April) tried to remove majority board appointment authority from the director of DCCA and assume that authority themselves. DCCA Cable Television Division reacted to this challenge to state control through a series of punitive actions including massive funding cuts, the exile of Mclaughlin, and a demand to reinstate board appointment authority to the director of DCCA. NOTE: Ironically now the Director of DCCA (soon to be Judge Recktenwald) has reversed himself and is now demanding all the non-profits remove the DCCA director appointment authority from their bylaws, and appoint their own boards! What Akaku was punished for is now a government demand that presumptive "private" nonprofit corporations change their bylaws. While Akaku was engaged in it's intercine battle among it's own board and DCCA's Cable Television Division the other PEGs (`Olelo, Ho`ike, and Naleo) stood quietly and nervously in the shadows, on the sidelines watching their pugnacious Maui cousin take a brutal beating at the hands of the government. This all changed and the other PEGS and their chosen "worthy" public producers came out of their "like-saynothing" hiding when an opinion (not released to the public), requested by DCCA from the State Attorney General found the Cable Television Division had engaged in a multi-year violation of state procurement law by not going through the Request for Proposal (RFP) competitive bidding process. This claim of procurement law violation by DCCA had been asserted by disenfranchised nonprofits (including CMPA) and public producers for years but DCCA failed to respond. Now as political response to the uppity Akaku, correcting this egregious violation of procurement law became DCCA job number one. Instead of the Cable Television Division just giving the money to the nonprofits they created and control, the rebellious and battered Akaku, `Olelo, Ho`ike, and Naleo suddenly saw all their food bowls in jeopardy. They would now have to compete with other nonprofits (real nonprofits in the sense these nonprofits are not created, funded, or have their board majority appointed by the government). The PEG selected "worthy" public presenter/producers sensed their privileged access and services were also under attack and mobilized to save the state created and controlled PEGS from competition from other real non-profits. This poses a paradox for social justice media activists who favor competition, are opposed to media concentration, and value the diversity of free speech, but apparently support a sole source exemption from procurement law for the government created and controlled non-profits. Strange bed fellows indeed when progressive media activists find themselves in a position of supporting state created and controlled PEG entities' right to sole sourced contracts. Everyone seemed to agree that DCCA's Cable Television Division (CATV) needed to be audited, something CMPA and other activists had advocated for for years with zero support from the PEGs themselves. However, now public producers chosen by the PEGs as "worthy" recipients of access services, and even some PEG administrators, are in accord with the disenfranchised public producers in their call to audit the Cable Television Division. CMPA agrees, but unlike our "worthy" franchised public producer cousins, are not suffering from Stockholm Syndrome and do not support a sole-sourced exemption for the current state created and controlled PEG service providers. CMPA agrees with Geller, April, and Hsu's concerns that the RFP process as currently constructed is unfair
and needs to be corrected, but we disagree that a sole source exemption for the current state created and controlled PEGs is a viable solution. Better a statewide collation of public media producers (both worthy and unworthy) join forces and their considerable talents under the umbrella of a non-profit (perhaps CMPA) and demand the RFP criteria be fair and then respond to the RFP. To sympathize with the state created, funded, and controlled captors is not the solution to assuring fair, firstcome, non discriminatory access to the media. You cannot promote competition between the diversity of ideas while advocating sole source exemption for government controlled nonprofits. CMPA believes the solution is to remove public access from state control through a membership driven, nonprofit with an elected board (similar to a non-government organization NGO), with a mission of first-come, nondiscriminatory access to promote the diversity of ideas in conflict. There were many people at the Hawai'i People's Fund Media Justice Conference that are more than capable of collaboratively managing and providing first-come nondiscriminatory access to public media.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.