You are on page 1of 23

Robbins & Judge

Organizational Behavior
13th Edition

Conflict and Negotiation

Bob Stretch
Southwestern College

15-0
Docsity.com
Chapter Learning Objectives
 After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
– Define conflict.
– Differentiate between the traditional, human relations, and
interactionist views of conflict.
– Outline the conflict process.
– Define negotiation.
– Contrast distributive and integrative bargaining.
– Apply the five steps in the negotiation process.
– Show how individual differences influence negotiations.
– Assess the roles and functions of third-party negotiations.
– Describe cultural differences in negotiations.

15-1
Docsity.com
Conflict Defined
 A process that begins when one party perceives that
another party has negatively affected, or is about to
negatively affect, something that the first party cares
about
– That point in an ongoing activity when an interaction
“crosses over” to become an interparty conflict
 Encompasses a wide range of conflicts that people
experience in organizations
– Incompatibility of goals
– Differences over interpretations of facts
– Disagreements based on behavioral expectations

15-2
Docsity.com
Transitions in Conflict Thought
 Traditional View of Conflict
– The belief that all conflict is harmful and must be avoided
– Prevalent view in the 1930s-1940s

 Conflict resulted from:


– Poor communication
– Lack of openness
– Failure to respond to employee needs

15-3
Docsity.com
Continued Transitions in Conflict Thought
 Human Relations View of Conflict
– The belief that conflict is a natural and inevitable outcome in
any group
– Prevalent from the late 1940s through mid-1970s
 Interactionist View of Conflict
– The belief that conflict is not only a positive force in a group
but that it is absolutely necessary for a group to perform
effectively
– Current view

15-4
Docsity.com
Forms of Interactionist Conflict

Functional Conflict
• Conflict that supports
the goals of the group
and improves its
performance

Dysfunctional
Conflict
• Conflict that hinders
group performance

15-5
Docsity.com
Types of Interactionist Conflict
 Task Conflict
– Conflicts over content and goals of the work
– Low-to-moderate levels of this type are
FUNCTIONAL

 Relationship Conflict
– Conflict based on interpersonal relationships
– Almost always DYSFUNCTIONAL

 Process Conflict
– Conflict over how work gets done
– Low levels of this type are FUNCTIONAL
15-6
Docsity.com
The Conflict Process
 We will focus on each step in a moment…

E X H I B I T 15-1

15-7
Docsity.com
Stage I: Potential Opposition or Incompatibility
 Communication
– Semantic difficulties, misunderstandings, and “noise”
 Structure
– Size and specialization of jobs
– Jurisdictional clarity/ambiguity
– Member/goal incompatibility
– Leadership styles (close or participative)
– Reward systems (win-lose)
– Dependence/interdependence of groups
 Personal Variables
– Differing individual value systems
– Personality types
15-8
Docsity.com
Stage II: Cognition and Personalization
 Important stage for two reasons:
1. Conflict is defined
• Perceived Conflict
– Awareness by one or more parties of the existence of
conditions that create opportunities for conflict to arise

2. Emotions are expressed that have a strong impact on the


eventual outcome
• Felt Conflict
– Emotional involvement in a conflict creating anxiety,
tenseness, frustration, or hostility

15-9
Docsity.com
Stage III: Intentions
 Intentions
– Decisions to act in a given way
– Note: behavior does not always accurate reflect intent
 Dimensions of conflict-handling intentions:
– Cooperativeness
• Attempting to satisfy
the other party’s
concerns
– Assertiveness
• Attempting to satisfy
one’s own concerns

Source: K. Thomas, “Conflict and Negotiation Processes in Organizations,” in M.D. Dunnette and L.M. Hough (eds.), Handbook of Industrial and
Organizational Psychology, 2nd ed., vol. 3 (Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1992), p. 668. With permission.

E X H I B I T 15-2

15-10
Docsity.com
Stage IV: Behavior
 Conflict Management
– The use of resolution and stimulation techniques to achieve
the desired level of conflict
 Conflict-Intensity Continuum

Source: Based on S.P. Robbins, Managing Organizational Conflict: A Nontraditional Approach (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1974), pp. 93–
97; and F. Glasi, “The Process of Conflict Escalation and the Roles of Third Parties,” in G.B.J. Bomers and R. Peterson (eds.), Conflict Management
and Industrial Relations (Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff, 1982), pp. 119–40.

E X H I B I T 15-3

15-11
Docsity.com
Conflict Resolution Techniques
– Problem solving – Bringing in outsiders
– Superordinate goals – Restructuring the
– Expansion of resources organization
– Avoidance – Appointing a devil’s
– Smoothing advocate
– Compromise
– Authoritative command
– Altering the human
variable
– Altering the structural
variables
– Communication
Source: Based on S. P. Robbins, Managing Organizational Conflict: A Nontraditional Approach (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1974), pp.
59–89

E X H I B I T 15-4

15-12
Docsity.com
Stage V: Outcomes
 Functional  Dysfunctional
– Increased group – Development of discontent
performance
– Reduced group
– Improved quality of effectiveness
decisions
– Retarded communication
– Stimulation of creativity
and innovation – Reduced group
cohesiveness
– Encouragement of interest
and curiosity – Infighting among group
members overcomes group
– Provision of a medium for goals
problem-solving
 Creating Functional
– Creation of an environment Conflict
for self-evaluation and
change – Reward dissent and punish
conflict avoiders

15-13
Docsity.com
Negotiation
 Negotiation (Bargaining)
– A process in which two or more parties exchange goods or
services and attempt to agree on the exchange rate for them
 Two General Approaches:
– Distributive Bargaining
• Negotiation that seeks to divide up a fixed amount of
resources; a win-lose situation
– Integrative Bargaining
• Negotiation that seeks one or more settlements that can create
a win-win solution

15-14
Docsity.com
Distributive versus Integrative Bargaining
Bargaining Characteristic Distributive
Integrative Bargaining
Bargaining
Goal Get all the pie you can Expand the pie
Motivation Win-Lose Win-Win
Focus Positions Interests
Information Sharing Low High
Duration of Relationships Short-Term Long-Term
Source: Based on R. J. Lewicki and J. A. Litterer,
Negotiation (Homewood, IL: Irwin, 1985), p. 280.

Integrative
Yours Mine Yours Mine
Distributive

E X H I B I T 15-5

15-15
Docsity.com
Bargaining Tactics and the Bargaining Zone
 Distributive Tactics  Integrative Tactics
– Make an aggressive – Bargain in teams
first offer – Put more issues on the
– Reveal a deadline table
– Don’t compromise

E X H I B I T 15-6

15-16
Docsity.com
The Negotiation Process
 BATNA
– The Best Alternative
To a Negotiated
Agreement
– The lowest acceptable
value (outcome) to an
individual for a
negotiated agreement
 The “Bottom Line”
for negotiations
E X H I B I T 15-7

15-17
Docsity.com
Individual Differences in Negotiation Effectiveness
 Personality Traits
– Extroverts and agreeable people weaker at distributive
negotiation – disagreeable introvert is best
– Intelligence is a weak indicator of effectiveness
 Mood and Emotion
– Ability to show anger helps in distributive bargaining
– Positive moods and emotions help integrative bargaining
 Gender
– Men and women negotiate the same way, but may
experience different outcomes
– Women and men take on gender stereotypes in negotiations:
tender and tough
– Women are less likely to negotiate

15-18
Docsity.com
Third-Party Negotiations
 Four Basic Third-Party Roles
– Mediator
• A neutral third party who facilitates a negotiated solution by using
reasoning, persuasion, and suggestions for alternatives
– Arbitrator
• A third party to a negotiation who has the authority to dictate an
agreement.
– Conciliator
• A trusted third party who provides an informal communication
link between the negotiator and the opponent
– Consultant
• An impartial third party, skilled in conflict management, who
attempts to facilitate creative problem solving through
communication and analysis

15-19
Docsity.com
Global Implications
 Conflict and Culture
– Japanese and U.S. managers view conflict differently
– U.S. managers more likely to use competing tactics while
Japanese managers are likely to use compromise and
avoidance
 Cultural Differences in Negotiations
– Multiple cross-cultural studies on negotiation styles, for
instance:
• American negotiators are more likely than Japanese bargainers
to make a first offer
• North Americans use facts to persuade, Arabs use emotion, and
Russians used asserted ideals
• Brazilians say “no” more often than Americans or Japanese

15-20
Docsity.com
Summary and Managerial Implications
 Conflict can be
constructive or
destructive
 Reduce excessive conflict
by using:
– Competition
– Collaboration
– Avoidance
– Accommodation
– Compromise
 Integrative negotiation is
a better long-term
method
E X H I B I T 15-8

15-21
Docsity.com
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise,
without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the
United States of America.

Copyright ©2009 Pearson Education,


Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

15-22
Docsity.com