You are on page 1of 2

Chapter 3 Section 6.

- Romans 5:10

Part 2 Chapter 3
Section 6—Romans 5:10.
For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being
reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.

The argument from these words, in favor of particular, and against universal redemption, stands thus: such for
whom Christ died are reconciled to God by his death; and such who are reconciled to God by his death shall be saved
by his life. If therefore Christ died for all men, and all men are reconciled to God by his death, then all men shall be
saved by his life. But all will not be saved by his life; therefore all men are not reconciled to God by his death, nor did
he die for all men. In answer to which,
1st. It is observed,[1] that “this argument supposes that Christ died to reconcile no man to God who shall not be
saved.” It is very true, and we not only suppose but affirm it, and argue thus: Those for whom Christ died to reconcile
them to God, are either reconciled to him or they are not; if they are not reconciled to him, then Christ with respect to
them must die in vain; if they are reconciled to him, then according to this text they shall be saved. Whence it
necessarily follows, that he died to reconcile none to God, who shall not be saved. But then it is said, it must follow,
1. That no man can be condemned at the last day for neglecting that great salvation tendered to, or purchased for
him; Christ having neither purchased for or offered to them any salvation, unless he offered to them that salvation
which he never died to purchase for them.” It is certain, that for those who shall not be saved, salvation was not
purchased, nor should it be offered to them, nor indeed to any. Such for whom salvation is purchased, are the church
whom Christ has purchased with his own blood; and to these, this salvation is not offered, but applied. The Gospel is
not an offer, but the power of God unto salvation, to these persons. And as for others, they will be condemned at the
last day, for their sins and transgressions against the law of God. And such who have had the opportunity of hearing
the Gospel, and have neglected, despised, and reproached it, their condemnation will be thereby aggravated. But,
2. It is also said, that “it must follow from hence, that all who are not saved, never had any Savior or Redeemer, and
so were never in a capacity to sin against a Savior; nor can their sins be aggravated by this consideration that they are
committed against redeeming love. I reply, that savior and saved are relative terms, and mutually put for each other: a
Savior supposes persons saved, and the saved supposes a Savior. Now Christ can be a Savior to no more than to them
who are saved; and to such who are not saved, he is no Savior; and yet such may be capable of sinning against him as
a Savior, though not as their Savior; they may deny him to be the Savior, despise, reproach, and neglect him as such,
as Jews, Deists, and others, have done. And though their sins are not aggravated by this consideration, that they are
committed against redeeming love, as having any share in it themselves, yet may be aggravated by their contempt of
it, as the blessing of others. Moreover, Christ may be sinned against by these persons as a Savior, in a way of
providence, though not in a way of grace; and their sins may be aggravated, as being committed against his
providential goodness, if not against his redeeming love. Though strictly, and properly speaking, sin is not against
Christ as a Savior, but against God as the Lawgiver; and not against redeeming love, but a law of righteousness.
2ndly It is allowed,[2] that the conclusion of this argument, all that are reconciled to Christ (God I suppose is
meant) shall be saved, may be true; but not that all, for whom Christ died, are reconciled to God.” But if all for whom
Christ died are not reconciled to God, then one principal end of his death, which was to make reconciliation for sin, is
not answered; and consequently his death must be so far in vain. And whereas it is observed, that “Christ died for
them when sinners, unjust, ungodly, and unbelievers, who cannot be actually reconciled to God, as none can, until
they believe and are justified; and that reconciliation by the death of Christ, is only by faith in it; and that God never
sent his Son to purchase actual reconciliation for any but conditionally, if, and when they believed.” I reply, that
though no man is reconciled to God’s way and method of salvation by Christ, or has peace in his soul, flowing from a
sense of atonement and justification by the blood of Christ, until he believes; which is meant by the phrase, much
more being reconciled; and regards not any performance of Christ’s, but the work of the Spirit of God upon the soul:
yet this hinders not but that men, whilst sinners, ungodly, and unbelievers, may be reconciled to God by the death of
Christ; that is to say, that their sins may be expiated, and fully atoned for; for faith is not the cause or condition of this
reconciliation; faith does not make peace with God, or reconciliation for sin, but receives the atonement already made.
Nor is it anywhere said, either that God sent his Son to procure reconciliation, or that Christ has obtained it on
condition of man’s believing. The scheme of reconciliation was drawn by God without any respect to faith, and was
completely obtained by Christ without any consideration of anything done, or to be done by us. The consequence of
which is reconciliation of our souls to this way of peace, by the Spirit of God; and the sure and certain effect of this,[11/2/2010 10:17:48 AM]
Chapter 3 Section 6. - Romans 5:10

is everlasting salvation to all those who are thus reconciled.


[1] Whitby, p. 154; ed. 2.151.

[2] Whitby, p. 155; ed. 2.151, 152.[11/2/2010 10:17:48 AM]