0 views

Uploaded by OPTICALMIMOOFDM

Vertical Handoff in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks with Predictive SINR using GM(1,1)

- Huawei Mulit-technology Single Ran - System Requirements and Solutions
- RANAdvisor_TrueSite_Handheld
- Research Proposal
- Performance-Analysis-WI-RU10.pdf
- 76016711-ZTE-UMTS-U9-3-HSUPA-Packet-Scheduling-Feature-Guide-V4-0.pdf
- Steelhead Licensing LLC
- Cdma Tutorial
- 3gpp Ts 36 304 (Lte Ue Procedures)
- 4g Technology
- 4G TECHNOLOGY_Presented by Sushil Kundu
- Handover Control
- Downlink TCP Proxy Solutions Over HSDPA With Multiple Data Flow
- beneficios de hsdpa
- 4g Technology
- Vertical Handover works
- 3gpp.1
- WiMAX Scheduling Algorithm Key Issue and Design Challenges Survey
- LTE Planning Gate01
- eul study
- Project Manager or Program Manager or Project Lead

You are on page 1of 10

(NRSC 2012)

April 10 Ǧ12, 2012, Faculty of Engineering/Cairo University, Egypt

C4. Vertical Handoff in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks with Predictive SINR using

GM(1,1)

Gamal Abd El-Fadeel1, Abd El-Rahman El-Sawy2, Michael Joseph Adib3

1

Engineering, Helwan, Cairo, Egypt, gam_hel@yahoo.com

2

Engineering, Helwan, Cairo, Egypt, aelsawy@seegypt.com

3

Engineering, Helwan, Cairo, Egypt, michael_jozeph@yahoo.com

ABSTRACT

Heterogeneous wireless network consists of various wireless networks, WiMAX, WiFi and cellular

communications. Future wireless networks must be able to coordinate services within a diverse-network

environment. One of the challenging problems for coordination is vertical handoff. In this article a Multi-attributes

SINR Based Vertical Handoff Algorithm for Next Generation Heterogeneous Wireless Networks with Predictive

SINR Using GM (1, 1) is proposed. The proposed algorithm uses the combined effects of SINR, user required

bandwidth, user traffic cost, utilization from participating access networks and user preference to make handoff

decision QoS aware which cannot be achieved with the use of traditional RSS as a vertical handoff criteria. The

problem of when to trigger handoff request is handled by using GM (1, 1), Grey Model first order one variable,

forecasting technique to predict the next SINR value. If it is lower than a pre-specified threshold, handoff request

will be fired. Simulation results have shown that the proposed algorithm performs better in terms of less cost to

user traffic, higher user satisfaction as well as higher system throughput.

I. INTRODUCTION

Wireless networking systems, including Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX) and

Wireless Fidelity (WiFi), and mobile communications, such as Universal Mobile Telecommunications System

(UMTS) [Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA),Time Division-CDMA (TD-CDMA) ,Time

Division-Synchronous CDMA (TD-SCDMA) and High Speed Downlink Packet Access/High Speed Uplink

Packet Access (HSDPA/HSUPA)],cdma2000 ,EVDO, and LTE , are rapidly being developed to achieve high-

speed transmission. These heterogeneous wireless networks obviously have differences in data rates, transmission

ranges, traffic classes, and access costs. However, the integration of WLANs and cellular networks has attracted

the most attention, because, currently, WLANs and cellular networks coexist and many cellular devices have dual

radio-frequency (RF) interfaces for WLANs and cellular access. Some previous studies on vertical handoff [1],

[2], [3], [4] are using Received Signal Strength (RSS) as the basic handoff decision indicator, in which handoff

decisions are made by comparing the RSS with the preset threshold values. However, the achievable data rate of a

mobile node (MN) is a function of received Signal to Interference and Noise Ratio (SINR), which is proportional

to the distance between Access Point (AP) or Base Station (BS) and the MN, as well as the current interference

level in the network. Using RSS based vertical handoff, a MN will handoff to another network, when it can not

receive the pre-established minimum receiving power from the original network. Use of RSS based vertical

handoff in integrated heterogeneous networks to support multimedia services cannot provide the user with the

multimedia QoS throughout, as the vertical handoff algorithm itself is not QoS aware. This may result in

premature handoff from the original network to the target network, even though the user achievable data rate from

original network is still much higher than it may get from target network. Using the RSS as the handoff indicator,

we are not achieving the best possible performance of the integrated wireless networks. To provide seamless

handover in heterogeneous wireless network, a SINR based vertical handoff that can support multimedia QoS is

desirable. Some previous studies for vertical handoff in heterogeneous wireless networks such as combined SINR

based vertical handoff (CSVH) [5] from both WLAN and WCDMA networks has shown that using the Signal to

Interference and Noise Ratio (SINR) as the handoff indicator results in higher throughput for both end users and

the system as compared with the RSS based vertical handoff. In this article, to provide seamless vertical handoff

with multi-attribute QoS support, a multi-attribute vertical handoff algorithm with predictive SINR using GM (1,

1) is proposed which uses SINR, user required bandwidth, user traffic cost, utilization of each access network, and

user preference. The proposed algorithm will be used in passive mode not in active mode as in [6] and the handoff

will be fired when the predicted value of SINR will be less than a pre-established threshold value determined by

application or QoS restrictions.

29th NATIONAL RADIO SCIENCE CONFERENCE

(NRSC 2012)

April 10 Ǧ12, 2012, Faculty of Engineering/Cairo University, Egypt

2) Determination of the best target network to handoff.

Simulation results have shown that the proposed algorithm performs better in terms of less cost to user traffic,

higher user satisfaction as well as higher system throughput.

A heterogeneous wireless network may consist of HSDPA/WCDMA/cdma2000 and WiMAX/WiFi networks.

The differences among them are in several aspects such as network architecture, cell coverage, access control

mechanisms, bandwidth, transmission technique, and accessing cost, as demonstrated in Table 1.

Network IEEE 802.11g IEEE 802.16e Cellular

characteristics WiFi Wi-MAX systems(3G/B3G)

Small range (100 - Medium range (2 - Large range (3 -

Coverage

300m) 5Km) 10Km)

Medium (up to 30 Low (up to 14.4

Bandwidth High (up to 54 Mbps)

Mbps) Mbps)

Deployment

Low Medium Very High

Cost

Cost of data

Low Medium High

service

cdma2000/EVDO is demonstrated in Fig. 1. As shown in Fig. 1, a MN can be existed at a given time in the

coverage area of an UMTS or cdma2000/EVDO alone. However, due to mobility, it can move into the regions

covered by more than one access network, i.e., simultaneously within the coverage areas of, for example, an

UMTS BS and an IEEE 802.11 AP. Multiple IEEE 802.11 WLAN coverage areas may be contained within an

UMTS coverage area or at the boundaries. A WiMAX coverage area can overlap with WLAN and/or UMTS

coverage areas. In dense urban areas, even the coverage areas of multiple UMTS/cdma2000 BSs can overlap. Due

to the nature of any heterogeneous network, a single operator or multiple operators may operate the BSs and APs

within a coverage area. Thus, multiple access technologies and multiple operators are typically involved in

vertical handoff decisions. Hence, there is a need for a common language in which the link-layer information and

the MNs’ information can be exchanged between different networks and/or operators. Here, this common

language is provided by the Media-Independent handover Function (MIHF) which is being defined in IEEE

802.21 [7], [10]. As shown in Fig.1, how it is envisioned the vertical handoff decision to be implemented. It is

suggested that the proposed vertical handoff algorithm is implemented in multiple Vertical Handoff Decision

Controller (VHDCs). These VHDCs are located in the access networks, as shown in Fig.1, and can provide the

vertical handoff decision function for a region covering one or multiple APs and/or BSs. It is envisioned that the

decision inputs for the VHDCs will be obtainable via the MIHF of IEEE 802.21 [10]. The MIHF facilitates

standards-based message exchanges between the various access networks (or attachment points) to share

information about the current link-layer conditions, traffic load and utilization, network capacities, traffic cost,

user preference, etc.

176

29th NATIONAL RADIO SCIENCE CONFERENCE

(NRSC 2012)

April 10 Ǧ12, 2012, Faculty of Engineering/Cairo University, Egypt

MIHF

UMTS,

Link layer

cdma2000, UMTS

802.11, Physical layer (WCDMA/TD-CDMA/TD-

Wi-MAX SCDMA/HSDPA/HSUPA) VHDC

WLAN

Wi-MAX

MN protocol stack VHDC

MIHF

Link layer

Fig. 1: Heterogeneous wireless network architecture with VHDC implementation based on IEEE802.21 MIHF.

In this proposal, SINR will be treated as time series. A time series is a collection of data points which are

generally sampled equally in time intervals. Time series prediction refers to the process by which the future values

of a system is forecasted based on the information obtained from the past and current data points. There are many

traditional methods for regression such as linear regression, exponential regression, and polynomial regression [9].

However grey model GM (1, 1) [8], [9] is adopted in this paper because it is more suitable for prediction of highly

noisy data such as SINR in the mobile air interface environment. Grey models predict the future values of a time

series based only on a set of the most recent data depending on the window size of the predictor. It is assumed that

all data values to be used in grey models are positive, and the sampling frequency of the time series is fixed. From

the simplest point of view, grey models which will be formulated below can be viewed as curve fitting

approaches. Grey model GM (1, 1) needs a few points to predict well, and few parameters and low computation

are used during the modelling. So GM (1, 1) is used in this proposal for SINR prediction because it is suitable for

mobile environment which gives great attention for computation which will affect the battery life time.

The SINR based vertical handoff can operate under active mode or passive mode [11].

In active mode, also called proactive mode, the user is continuously seeking for maximum available bandwidth

from the integrated networks. The user keeps measuring receiving SINR for every network in the heterogeneous

network, conducting the SINR conversion and sending the handoff request to VHDC based on the SINR

comparison results. Obviously, the active mode has the advantage of self detection, and resulting in less handoff

delays, and also can be deployed for cells under low load condition. But it suffers from two problems. The first

problem is the higher battery drain of the MNs as a result of every MN in the network must observe all the

networks continuously in the heterogeneous network which results in more power dissipation form the MN battery

and the battery life time will be decreased. The second problem is due to huge number of handoff requests to the

VHDC because any MN finds a better SINR will request handoff even if the MN is already receive a sufficient

SINR value ,which will be a load to the system ,causing unnecessary handoffs and increasing the handoff

overhead. Fewer handoffs indicate a better handoff algorithm.

In the passive mode, also called reactive mode, the measurements of user receiving SINR from every network

in the heterogeneous network are periodically measured and sent to VHDC directly and the handoff request is sent

after waiting for the deterioration of the existing session link below certain threshold to VHDC, in which the

177

29th NATIONAL RADIO SCIENCE CONFERENCE

(NRSC 2012)

April 10 Ǧ12, 2012, Faculty of Engineering/Cairo University, Egypt

handoff decisions are made according to the SINR values, the user specific QoS requirements, as well as the cell

congestion conditions. Obviously, the passive mode is preferable from the network operator’s point of view,

because of the decreased handoff overhead but it suffers from handoff delay which results in higher chances of

dropped sessions. A comparison between active mode and passive mode is demonstrated in Table 2.

Active (Proactive) 1- Better chances to adapting 1. Higher battery

to network, application, drain.

and data link changes. 2. Increased handoff

2- Lower chances of dropped overhead.

sessions.

3- Less handoff delays.

Passive (Reactive) 1. Preserves battery power. 1- Higher handoff

2. Lower computational delay.

processing.

3. Decreased handoff

overhead.

So, passive mode will be adopted because of its advantages. Predicting SINR using GM (1, 1) is adopted to

overcome the handoff delay problem in the passive (reactive) mode. So SINR prediction is very important in this

proposal.

In grey systems theory, GM (n, m) denotes a grey model, where n is the order of the difference equation and m

is the number of variables. Although various types of grey models can be used, GM (1, 1) model is adopted in

SINR predictions because of its computational efficiency. It should be noted that in real time applications, the

computational burden is the most important parameter after the performance. GM (1, 1) is pronounced as ‘‘Grey

Model First Order One Variable”. The differential equations of the GM (1, 1) model have time-varying

coefficients. In other words, the model is renewed as the new data become available to the prediction model. In

this proposal, prediction of SINR consists of two steps, i.e., the preprocess step and the prediction step.

In order to smooth the randomness, the primitive SINR data obtained from the system to form the GM (1, 1) is

subjected to an operator, named Accumulating Generation Operator (AGO). The differential equation (i.e. GM (1,

1)) is solved to obtain the n-step ahead predicted value of the SINR. Finally, using the predicted value, the Inverse

Accumulating Generation Operator (IAGO) is applied to find the predicted values of original data. Consider a

time sequence x ( 0 ) that denotes the SINR values

x (x (1), x ( 2 ),......, x ( n )), n ! 4 (1)

(0)

where x is a non-negative SINR sequence and n is the sample size of the data. When this sequence is subjected

to the Accumulating Generation Operation (AGO), the following sequence x (1) is obtained. It is obvious that x (1)

is monotonically increasing.

(1 ) (1 ) (1 ) (1 )

x (x (1), x ( 2 ),......, x ( n )), n ! 4 (2)

where

k

¦

(1 ) (0)

x (k ) x (i ), k 1, 2 , 3 ,...., n (3)

i 1

The purpose of the preprocess is to smooth the fitting curve. For instance, an original data sequence of {10, 30,

20, 50} becomes {10, 40, 60,110} after preprocessing.

178

29th NATIONAL RADIO SCIENCE CONFERENCE

(NRSC 2012)

April 10 Ǧ12, 2012, Faculty of Engineering/Cairo University, Egypt

After the preprocess step, the new data sequence x (1) is used as the input data for curve fitting in the SINR

(1 )

prediction step. The generated mean sequence z of x (1) is defined as:

(1 ) (1 ) (1 ) (1 )

z (z (1), z ( 2 ),...., z (n) (4)

where z (1) ( k ) is the mean value of adjacent data, i.e.

(1 ) (1 ) (1 )

z (k ) 0 .5 x ( k ) 0 .5 x ( k 1), k 2 , 3 ,...., n . (5)

The least square estimate sequence of the grey difference equation of GM (1, 1) is defined as follows:

(0) (1 )

x ( k ) az (k ) b (6)

(1 )

dx (t )

ax

(1 )

(t ) b (7)

dt

T T 1 T

[a, b] (B B) B Y (8)

where

Y >x (0)

( 2 ), x

(0)

( 3 ),...., x

(0)

(n) @T

(9)

ª z (1 ) ( 2 ) 1º

« (1 ) »

« z (3) 1»

« . .»

B « » (10)

« . .»

« »

. .

« »

(1 )

«¬ z ( n ) 1 »¼

(1 )

According to (7), the solution of x (t ) at time k:

(1 ) ª (0) b º ak b

x p ( k 1) «x (1 ) »e (11)

¬ a ¼ a

To obtain the predicted value of the primitive SINR data at time (k + 1), the IAGO is used to establish the

following grey model.

(0) ª (0) b º ak a

x p ( k 1) « x (1 ) »e (1 e ) (12)

¬ a ¼

Although the vertical handoff algorithm proposed in this research is general to cope with any combination of

different networks which make integrated heterogeneous network as presented in the network model and system

description in Section II, WLAN and B3G will be investigated because, currently, WLANs and cellular networks

coexist and many cellular devices have dual radio-frequency (RF) interfaces for WLANs and cellular access.

In this proposal, downlink traffic is given the concentration, because it normally requires higher bandwidth

than uplink, especially for multimedia services such as video streaming using the HSDPA channel while

connected with WCDMA. The proposed handoff algorithm can be analytically presented by assuming that, there

179

29th NATIONAL RADIO SCIENCE CONFERENCE

(NRSC 2012)

April 10 Ǧ12, 2012, Faculty of Engineering/Cairo University, Egypt

are m BS: BS1, BS2,..., BSm, and n APs: AP1, AP2,. . . , APn, where all candidate BSs and APs for the user can be

indexed by 1 to m+n in a set A:

For each handoff event , which is fired when predicted SINR is lower than threshold, best BS or AP from the

candidate set A for each user will be determined by the handoff algorithm residing in VHDC with the

consideration of the following criteria: SINR, user required bandwidth, cost to user traffic , network utilization

and user preference. All attributes of the handoff algorithm can be negotiated using MIHF of IEEE 802.21 which

makes this proposal applicable in a standard way to fit all vendors and operators.

Maximum achievable data rate for the given carrier bandwidth and SINR can be determined with the help of

Shannon capacity formula. The maximum achievable data rate R AP from WLAN and R BS from WCDMA for a

connected user can be represented by the receiving SINR from these two networks J AP and J BS respectively [12],

[13] as:

J AP

R AP W AP log 2 (1 ) (14)

* AP

J BS

R BS W BS log 2 (1 ) (15)

* BS

where W AP , W BS are carrier bandwidth of WLAN and WCDMA, and * AP , * BS are the channel coding loss

factors for WLAN and WCDMA respectively. Since, the data rate of both networks are different, therefore to

compare the SINR of the two networks, the SINR from the first network must be converted to the SINR of the

second network. Thus, assuming the data rates R AP and R BS to be equal, the relationship between the SINR of

WCDMA as well as WLAN can be obtained as given below in (16):

W AP

J

J BS * BS (( 1

AP

)

W BS

1) (16)

* AP

Knowing the data rate from both the networks, the SINR from AP can be converted to the equivalent SINR of BS

using the equation (16). Now the SINR from WCDMA and WLAN can be compared as an attribute to make the

handoff decision. Sets of SINR values for a user i received from all BSs ( S BS , i ) and all APs ( S AP , i ) at a particular

instant of time are:

S BS , i [J BS 1 , i , J BS 2 , i ,....., J BS ,i ] (17)

m

It is assumed that a BS transmits to only one user via HSDPA channel at a time, with maximum power to achieve

the optimal physical rate. The SINR J BSj , i received by a user i from WCDMA BSj can be represented as [16]:

G BSj , i PBSj , i

J BSj , i m

(19)

P0 ¦ (G BSk , i P BSk ) G BSj , i D ( P BSj PBSj , i )

k 1

kz j

where PBSj is the total transmitting power of BSj , PBSj , i is the transmitting power of BSj to user i, G BSj , i is the

channel gain between user i and BSj , D is the orthogonality factor, P0 is thermal noise power. For WLAN,

Distributed Coordination Function (DCF) is used, with only one station can transmit at one time within the

coverage of an AP [14]. The SINR J APj , i received by a user i from WLAN APj can be represented as:

180

29th NATIONAL RADIO SCIENCE CONFERENCE

(NRSC 2012)

April 10 Ǧ12, 2012, Faculty of Engineering/Cairo University, Egypt

G APj , i P APj

J APj , i n

(20)

PB ¦G APk , i P APk

k 1

kz j

where P APj is the transmitting power of AP j , G APj , i is the channel gain between user i and AP j , PB is the

background noise power. Using (16), the SINR received from APs ( S AP , i ) is converted to the equivalent SINR

( S cAP , i ) to achieve the same data rate via BS as:

W AP

S AP , i

S cAP , i * BS (( 1 )

W BS

1) (21)

* AP

The set of SINR value S i of all BSs and APs in candidate set A (13) for the user i can be represented by:

Si S BS , i S cAP , i (22)

For a required bandwidth R i for a user i, the minimum receiving SINR from BS ( J min, i ) can be calculated from

(15) as:

Ri

J m in, i * BS ( 2

W BS

1)

(23)

The indices of the BSs and APs in A (13) that can provide the required R i for the user i can be determined by:

( S i J min, i ) t 0 (24)

Let C be the system cost vector, representing the cost of user traffic transmission through each candidate BS or

AP:

C C BS C AP (25)

where the sets C BS and C AP are the cost of each candidate BS and AP:

C BS [ C BS , C BS ,......, C BS ]

1 2 m

(26)

C AP [ C AP , C AP ,......, C AP ]

1 2 n

(27)

Both the packet transmission cost and processing cost through the access network contribute to the total cost.

Higher cost not only means more system operation cost, but may also result in more packet delay.

Let U be the system utilization vector, represented by the percentage of utilization of each candidate BS and

AP:

U U BS U AP (28)

where the sets U BS and U AP are the utilization of the candidate BSs and APs:

U BS [U BS 1 ,U BS 2

,......, U BS m

] (29)

181

29th NATIONAL RADIO SCIENCE CONFERENCE

(NRSC 2012)

April 10 Ǧ12, 2012, Faculty of Engineering/Cairo University, Egypt

The utilization is defined in terms of the downlink bandwidth usage of BS or AP. Additional user packet will be

dropped by the BS or AP that is congested with utilization reaching to 1. The network utilization vector can be

periodically exchanged and updated between VHDCs via MIHF of IEEE 802.21.

E. User Preference

In order to find an optimal network for a user, user preferences have to be considered. Let P be the user

preference vector which indicates preferences in terms of application characteristics.

where the sets PBS and PAP are the user preference of the candidate BSs and APs:

1 2 m

(32)

P AP [ P AP , P AP ,......, P AP ]

1 2 n

(33)

The preference vector P is created by the user, also it negotiated and updated via IEEE 802.21.

F. Handoff decision

The integration of all criteria leads to the index of the best BS or AP from the candidate set A (13) for user i,

and is determined in VHDC by:

§ S i J min, i Px ·

Max ¨ u Pe ¸ (34)

¨ kU ¸

© Cue ¹

The objective of this handoff algorithm is to find the best BS or AP which can support the user required

bandwidth, lower cost and higher user preference with lower utilization. The exponential function e kU is used for

utilization adaptation, with the default setting of k 1 . Adjusting the value of k to a slightly higher value will

increase the base e k , resulting in higher exponential growth rate for larger utilization values, which can be

considered for network with higher load. When k 0 in e kU , the utilization adaptation is disabled, while SINR,

user required bandwidth, the user traffic cost, and the user preference become the QoS consideration for handoff.

The term Pe Px is used to represent the user preference or willing factor in the algorithm. The exponential

Px

e represents the weight of user preference by adjusting the value of the parameter x in the exponential e Px . The

higher the parameter x means the greater weight of the user preference factor which in turns will affect greater in

the choice of the best network (BS or AP) from the candidate set A. The user is responsible for adjusting the value

of x parameter to indicate and represent its desire. The user can disable any type of access networks in the

heterogeneous network by setting its preference P equal to zero.

The performance of the proposed vertical handoff algorithm, the SINR based vertical handoff algorithm, and

the RSS based vertical handoff algorithm, using various thresholds setting for RSS such as -90dBm , -85dBm ,and

-80dBm , has been evaluated by using a new developed MATLAB-based simulator at the system level [15]. The

simulation scenario is shown in Fig. 2, in which there are 7 BS and 12 AP placed at each WCDMA HSDPA cell

boundary as in [5],[6]. 400 randomly generated MNs are used inside the simulation area [6]. The mobility model

for MNs is that, each MN changes its position every time interval depending on its moving speed and direction,

which are randomly chosen with mean direction and speed changing rate of 5 changes per 100 seconds. The

maximum user moving speed is 80km/hour [5]. In the traffic generator module, each session generation is subject

to the Poisson process with its mean session arrival rate for each user of lambda (sessions/second). On the other

hand, every initiated session has its own session holding time, and the initiated session is terminated after such a

time. The holding time of each session is subject to exponential distribution with a mean session holding time of ht

(seconds). In this simulation, the mean session holding time is of 60 seconds. In propagation condition model

module, a macro-cell propagation model for urban and suburban areas [16] is used, and for an antenna height of

15 meters, the path loss is:

182

29th NATIONAL RADIO SCIENCE CONFERENCE

(NRSC 2012)

April 10 Ǧ12, 2012, Faculty of Engineering/Cairo University, Egypt

where f is the carrier frequency (2GHz for WCDMA, 2.4GHz for WLAN), R is the distance in meters between

the user and the BS or AP, and log (F) is the log-normal distribution shadowing with standard deviation sigma

where V 10 dB . The maximum BS power is 40 dBm, with 50% allocated to HSDPA channel [13]. User end

background noise power equals to 7 . 66 u 10 14 W . For WLAN, DCF is used and only one station can transmit at

one time, maximum AP transmitting power is 20dBm, and the Background noise power equals to -96dBm. In this

simulation scenario, it is assumed that the cost of the BS and AP to be 0.8 and 0.4 [6]. The BS is given higher

cost, considering that the operational costs of WCDMA HSDPA systems are higher than WLANs.

2500

2000

1500

1000

500 MN

y(m)

0 BS

-500 AP

-1000

-1500

-2000

-2500

-2500 -1500 -500 500 1500 2500

x (m)

The overall system throughput, the sum of the data rates that are delivered to all MNs in the heterogeneous

network and measured in bits per second (bps), for different session arrival rates are shown in Fig. 3, which shows

that the proposed vertical handoff with predictive SINR using GM (1, 1) algorithm performs the best compared to

the combined SINR based [5] and RSS based vertical handoff algorithms, also the SINR algorithm [5] performs

better than RSS based vertical handoff techniques in providing higher system throughput, and the increment

become more noticeable at higher session arrival rate. Increase in the overall system throughput is noticeable even

when adaptive utilization is not used (k=0 in e kU ), because the cost vector C has certain effect. Also, it is clear

from Fig. 3, the higher values of k results in a greater weight of the exponential function ( e kU ) of the utilization

vector U in the denominator, which results in higher exponential growth for larger utilization values which leads

to selecting networks with lower utilization and this considered a great benefit for both the users and the operators.

Further increase in the value of k may or may not improve the system performance; it depends on the network

topology, the users' behavior, and other factors. So the optimal k should be calculated for each heterogonous

network topology independently to achieve the best performance of the system.

VI. CONCLUSION

In this paper, a vertical handoff algorithm in heterogeneous wireless networks with predictive SINR using GM

(1, 1) is proposed for providing MNs the ability to roam seamlessly between networks. The proposed vertical

handoff algorithm uses SINR, user required bandwidth, user traffic cost, network utilization, and user preference

to make handoff decision QoS aware which cannot be achieved by the traditional RSS based vertical handoff

algorithms. GM (1, 1) is used to predict the next SINR value, if it is lower than a pre-specified threshold, handoff

request will be fired. The proposed vertical handoff algorithm is implemented in multiple VHDCs and the

decision inputs for these VHDCs are obtainable via MIHF of IEEE802.21 at layer 2.5.

183

29th NATIONAL RADIO SCIENCE CONFERENCE

(NRSC 2012)

April 10 Ǧ12, 2012, Faculty of Engineering/Cairo University, Egypt

90

80

70 RSS-80

RSS-85

60

RSS-90

50

SINR

40 k=0

30 k=1

20 k=2

10

0

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05

Session Arrival Rate (sessions/second)

REFERENCES

[1] A. H. Zahran, B. Liang, and A. Saleh, “Signal thresholds adaptation for vertical handoff in heterogeneous

wireless network,” Mobile Networks and Applications, Springer Netherlands, vol. 11, no. 4, 625-640, Aug.

2006.

[2] W. Shen and Q.-A. Zeng, “A novel decision strategy of vertical handoff in overlay wireless networks,” in

Proc. Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA’06).

[3] K.-S. Jang, J.-S. Kim, H.-J. Shin, and D.-R. Shin, “A novel vertical handoff strategy for integrated

IEEE802.11 WLAN/CDMA networks,” in Proc.ICIS’05.

[4] Ben-Jye Chang; Jun-Fu Chen; “Cross-Layer-Based Adaptive Vertical Handoff With Predictive RSS in

Heterogeneous Wireless Networks” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 57,

NO. 6, NOVEMBER 2008.

[5] K. Yang, I. Gondal, B. Qiu, and L. S. Dooley, “Combined SINR based vertical handoff algorithm for next

generation heterogeneous wireless networks,” in Proc. Globecom, Washington, DC, 2007.

[6] Kemeng Yang; Gondal, I.; Bin Qiu; “Multi-Dimensional Adaptive SINR Based Vertical Handoff for

Heterogeneous Wireless Networks,” in IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS, VOL. 12, NO. 6, JUNE 2008.

[7] SuKyoung Lee; Sriram, K.; Kyungsoo Kim; Yoon Hyuk Kim; Golmie, N.; “Vertical Handoff Decision

Algorithms for Providing Optimized Performance in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks “IEEE

TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 58, NO. 2, FEBRUARY 2009.

[8] Erdal Kayacan, Baris Ulutas , Okyay Kaynak ; “Grey system theory-based models in time series prediction”

Expert Systems with Applications 37 (2010) 1784–1789.

[9] T.-C. Chang, K.-L. Wen, and M.-L. You, “The study of regression based on grey system theory,” in Proc.

IEEE Int. Conf. Syst., Man, Cybern., Oct. 1998, vol. 5, pp. 4307–4311.

[10] De La Oliva, A.; Banchs, A.; Soto, I.; Melia, T.; Vidal, A.; “An Overview of IEEE 802.21: Media-

Independent Handover Services” IEEE Wireless Communications. August 2008 .

[11] Abhijit Sur,Douglas C.Sicker; “Multi Layer Rules Based Framework for Vertical Handoff , A novel

approach to trigger Vertical Handoff in multihomed devices”.

[12] S. Toumpis and A. J. Goldsmith, “Capacity regions for wireless ad hoc networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless

Commun., vol. 2, no. 4, July 2003 .

[13] H. Holma and A. Toskala, WCDMA for UMTS. New York: John Wiley, 2004.

[14] “Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications,” IEEE Std 802.11b,

1999.

[15] Hiroshi Harada and Ramjee Prasad, Simulation and software radio for mobile communications.

[16] “Radio frequency (RF) system scenarios (Release 7),” 3GPP TR 25.942 V7.0.0, Mar. 2007.

184

- Huawei Mulit-technology Single Ran - System Requirements and SolutionsUploaded byPunky Hero
- RANAdvisor_TrueSite_HandheldUploaded bysd
- Research ProposalUploaded byShaujug Chowdhury
- Performance-Analysis-WI-RU10.pdfUploaded byRun Mouth
- 76016711-ZTE-UMTS-U9-3-HSUPA-Packet-Scheduling-Feature-Guide-V4-0.pdfUploaded byRagavendra Kumar
- Steelhead Licensing LLCUploaded byPriorSmart
- Cdma TutorialUploaded byswathi sree
- 3gpp Ts 36 304 (Lte Ue Procedures)Uploaded bydelafinca55
- 4g TechnologyUploaded byHardiksingh Rajput
- 4G TECHNOLOGY_Presented by Sushil KunduUploaded bysushil4056
- Handover ControlUploaded byImtiaz N
- Downlink TCP Proxy Solutions Over HSDPA With Multiple Data FlowUploaded byjcdlopes390
- beneficios de hsdpaUploaded bygabriel
- 4g TechnologyUploaded byKowsik_JS
- Vertical Handover worksUploaded byJeff Mirondo Kibalya
- 3gpp.1Uploaded bysatish_kalal1312
- WiMAX Scheduling Algorithm Key Issue and Design Challenges SurveyUploaded byEditor IJRITCC
- LTE Planning Gate01Uploaded bykhan shadab
- eul studyUploaded byamansour89
- Project Manager or Program Manager or Project LeadUploaded byapi-76907253
- FBBAUploaded byАндрей Моисеев
- 51_1551-hsd10102_1Uploaded byMohamadHajmosavi
- 3G built-in laptop(final)Uploaded byAshok Devidas Jadhav
- Patton Aukerman ShorterUploaded byHermandeep Kaur
- UMTS EvolutionUploaded byDuc Nguyen
- Huawei UMTS Service KPI.pdfUploaded byardian
- Xcz l 2005211Uploaded byJohnson Nyangoya
- wcnUploaded byYugandar Reddy
- 65Uploaded byNeha Goyal
- Mobile Ass1 BaruUploaded bymohamad.taib

- Mostafa 2009Uploaded byOPTICALMIMOOFDM
- Kamel 2009Uploaded byOPTICALMIMOOFDM
- 1-s2.0-S1319157897800067-mainUploaded byOPTICALMIMOOFDM
- 89_J_6851Uploaded byOPTICALMIMOOFDM
- fdma3Uploaded byShankarPrasai
- Ahmed 2010Uploaded byOPTICALMIMOOFDM
- 1-s2.0-S2090447912000615-mainUploaded byOPTICALMIMOOFDM
- l Comm 28931951Uploaded byOPTICALMIMOOFDM
- 08621012Uploaded byOPTICALMIMOOFDM
- On the Performance of Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access Systems with Imperfect Successive Interference CancellationUploaded byOPTICALMIMOOFDM
- Yark in 2017Uploaded byOPTICALMIMOOFDM
- bai2018 (2)Uploaded byOPTICALMIMOOFDM
- Moos Avi 2019Uploaded byOPTICALMIMOOFDM
- A_combination_of_selected_mapping_and_clipping_to_.pdfUploaded byOPTICALMIMOOFDM
- aem00185-0051Uploaded byOPTICALMIMOOFDM
- Abdel Mall Ek 1994Uploaded byOPTICALMIMOOFDM
- 72574-pdfUploaded byOPTICALMIMOOFDM
- 10.1007%2Fs11356-015-5585-1Uploaded byOPTICALMIMOOFDM
- PCM and DPCMUploaded byOPTICALMIMOOFDM
- 253380861-Simulation-de-PCM-DPCM-y-DM-Simulink.pdfUploaded byOPTICALMIMOOFDM
- Simulink PCMUploaded bybipbul
- Comparative Study of Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radio System Using Energy Detection over Different ChannelsUploaded byOPTICALMIMOOFDM
- 10.1109@leos.2003.1251826Uploaded byOPTICALMIMOOFDM
- Useful PhrasesUploaded bywinnieXD
- Lec-7.3Uploaded byLân Võ Thành
- partial_pivoting_example1.pdfUploaded byOPTICALMIMOOFDM
- Tutorial 6Uploaded byOPTICALMIMOOFDM
- 10.1007%2F978-3-642-27192-2_9Uploaded byOPTICALMIMOOFDM

- Cover PageUploaded byAnkita Pandey
- Sanjeev ReportUploaded byShilpi Kumari
- Aperture Coupled Fed Micro-Strip Patch AntennaUploaded byemremiran
- MRF060114_DEUploaded byИлья Хинкин
- Brosur Generator MagnaUploaded byNirwana Group
- CWOPA PDs SERS 20140908 ChiefInvestmentOfficerUploaded byEH
- Francis TurbineUploaded byAshutosh Shukla
- England Anaerobic Endurance TestUploaded byRyan Gibney
- The Middle Ages Series Burgundian Code Book of Constitutions or Law of GundobadUploaded byJuan
- applicationsAndCaseSetup.pdfUploaded byJ Alfredo Tellez
- Planning for an Uncertain Future: Promoting adaptation to climate change through flexible and forward-looking decision makingUploaded byOxfam
- Fiacom SAIC 2012'- MG6 MG 6 Parts CatalogUploaded byleo
- McAfee Profiler 1.0 Release NotesUploaded byPrakash Vivek
- D C Das Dish StrilingUploaded byAbhinavSingh
- Weldpoints_infoUploaded byRamarao Ch
- Bobbie Eddins, Jeffrey Kirk, Dorleen Hooten, Brenda Russell - Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Editor-in-Chief, NATIONAL FORUM JOURNALS, www.nationalforum.com (Founded 1982)Uploaded byBryan Elliott
- Economic Impact of Margaret ThatcherUploaded bytaufeek_irawan7201
- P1 SPM 2017Uploaded byPuvaneswary Muniandy
- Vishay - Vskd600 Series - Bi Diodo 600a 2000vUploaded bywallersona
- Thinstuff Manual XPVS 1.0.2 EnUploaded byAwai Agung
- Using PivotTUploaded byZara Ramis
- CourteneyUploaded byramlohani
- Final All in One - PDFUploaded byJoseph Johnston
- KNT86 Kronos and HermesUploaded byKeneth Del Carmen
- Manuscripts Volume 2 Issue 1 Vol 2 Issue 1 M 09Uploaded byrajesh
- Houston Relocation and Newcomer Guide winter 2013Uploaded byesozan
- SME (Small & Medium Enterprise) Banking of Commercial Bank.A study on Mutual Trust Bank Shahparan Branch, SylhetUploaded byMuntasirKhan
- c-apiUploaded bykmgegmpmq
- Form of Convertible Promissory Note BoilerplateUploaded byScoreFinancial
- Engagement Pack PPEUploaded bychris