You are on page 1of 46

Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.

com>

SYSTEMIC ABUSES OF JUDICIAL POWER - HARIHAR V US BANK, et al


Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.com> Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 3:03 PM
To: elizabeth_warren@warren.senate.gov
Cc: "Constituent.services@state.ma.us" <constituent.services@state.ma.us>, NewYorkComplaints Dojoig
<dojoig.newyorkcomplaints@usdoj.gov>, andrew.lelling@usdoj.gov, mary.murrane@usdoj.gov,
christina.sterling@usdoj.gov, Nairoby_Gabriel@warren.senate.gov, Nora_Keefe@warren.senate.gov,
scheduling@warren.senate.gov, sydney_levin-epstein@markey.senate.gov, lori.trahan@mail.house.gov,
ayanna.pressley@mail.house.gov, ma-igo-general-mail@state.ma.us, igo-fightfraud@state.ma.us,
maura.healey@state.ma.us, jesse.boodoo@state.ma.us

Dear Senator Warren,

Attached, please find a formal letter which addresses systemic abuses of power within the Federal and
State Judiciary, including the Supreme Court of The United States. These evidenced abuses are
perceived to impact matters of National Security. You are respectfully asked to bring this serious legal
matter to the attention of Congress. If you have ANY questions regarding this matter, please advise.
Thank you.

Respectfully,

Mohan A. Harihar
Pro Se Litigant/Illegally Foreclosed Homeowner
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526 (Mobile)
Mo.harihar@gmail.com

4-29-19 Letter to Sen Warren RE Systemic Judicial Abuses.pdf


1248K

1
A LETTER TO UNITED STATES SENATOR ELIZABETH WARREN (D-MA)

April 29, 2018

The Honorable Senator Elizabeth Warren


2400 JFK Federal Building
15 New Sudbury Street
Boston, MA 02203

RE: SYSTEMIC ABUSES OF JUDICIAL POWER

Dear Senator Warren:

The purpose of this communication is to formally bring to the attention of Congress – systemic
judicial abuses that have now been evidenced at EVERY level of the Federal (and State)
Judiciary, including the Supreme Court of The United States (SCOTUS). Reference is
specifically made to the Federal civil complaint, HARIHAR v US BANK, et al1 - which
primarily seeks damages for the following:
1. Damages suffered from my identified illegal foreclosure2; and
2. Damages to my Intellectual Property (The HARIHAR FCS MODEL), which is also
considered a Trade Secret – protected under the Economic Espionage Act. The
referenced IP is designed to assist The United States with economic growth and repair
from damages resulting from the US Foreclosure Crisis – while also delivering
substantial relief to illegally foreclosed homeowners Nationwide.3

Senator Warren, as you know (and as a matter of record), I have updated you and other
legislative leaders in the Commonwealth throughout the eight (8) year history of this litigation.

1
HARIHAR v US BANK et al - Certiorari Petition No. 18-7752 (SCOTUS); First Circuit Appeal No. 17-1381; US
District Court Docket No. 15-cv-11880.
2
The Department of Justice (DOJ), Massachusetts Office of the Attorney General (MA AGO) and Federal Bank
Regulators have all identified Mr. Harihar’s Property as an illegal foreclosure.
3
See Exhibit 1 to view an overview of the original FCS Model presented to the EOP (Obama administration), per
the specific request of VP Joe Biden.
2
You are also well aware that the referenced IP – a primary component to this lawsuit, was
favorably presented to your Senior Economic Advisor – Bruno Freitas.4 A thorough review of
every court document associated with this Federal litigation shows that not a single judicial
officer – in the US District Court, First Circuit Appeals Court and even The US Supreme Court,
has even acknowledged the words: (1) Intellectual Property; (2) Trade Secret; (3) Economic
Espionage; or (4) National Security. That’s just the beginning. The (partial) list of evidenced
claims blatantly ignored (or denied without cause) by the Federal (and similarly, the State)
judiciary includes the following:
1. Refusing to address/clarify Jurisdiction issues;
2. Ignoring evidenced Treason claims under ARTICLE III and 18 U.S. Code § 2381;
3. Ignoring evidenced Misprision of Treason claims under 18 U.S. Code § 2382;
4. Failure to acknowledge an unprecedented NINE (9) Federal Recusals associated with
this litigation;
5. Refusing to exercise judicial discretion by wrongfully denying or unnecessarily delaying
without valid cause, repeated requests for the Court to assist with the Appointment of
Counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915;
6. Refusing to address the evidenced (and unopposed) Fraud on the Court claims under
Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3), (4) and (6);
7. Refusing to address evidenced unopposed claims of Judicial Fraud on the Court,
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3) and clear violations to the Judicial Code of Conduct
and Judicial Oath;
8. Ignoring evidenced RICO claims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Chapter 96 – involving the
US Attorney’s Office (MA), the MA AGO and attorneys for Bank Defendants
WELLS FARGO and US BANK;
9. Refusing to address or even acknowledge: (1) the Appellant’s Intellectual Property (IP)
Rights; (2) Evidenced Economic Espionage claims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1832; and
(3) matters believed to impact National Security;

4
Additional presentations of the HARIHAR FCS Model include: (1) the MA and NH State Attorney General’s
Office; (2) the Congressional offices of former US Congresswoman Niki Tsongas (D-MA); (3) the House Financial
Services Committee – Former Deputy Chief Counsel - Gail Laster, and (4) the Executive Office of the President
(EOP) (under the Obama Administration) – per the specific request of Vice President Joe Biden.
3
10. Refusing to address identified Due Process Violations, including (but not limited to)
refusing a trial by jury;
11. Ignoring requests for a grand jury;
12. Refusing to address Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 - Deprivation of Rights Under Color
of Law;
13. Refusing to address Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 Conspiracy Against Rights;
14. Refusing to address Title 18, U.S.C., Section 1001 Fraud and False Statements;
15. Refusing to address Title 42 Sec. 1983, Civil action for Deprivation of Rights;
16. Failing to address the Petitioner’s request(s) to Clarify the DOJ’s (and similarly the MA
AGO’s) intention to enjoin the civil complaint(s) with criminal indictments;
17. Refusing to acknowledge the introduction of new evidence, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
60(b)(2), including (but not limited to) the recent (sworn) testimony of Wells Fargo
CEO (former) Tim Sloan before the House Financial Services Committee on March
12, 2019;
18. Failing to acknowledge the Petitioner’s repeated concerns for his personal safety and
security; and others.

While further investigation is needed to determine WHY these evidenced judicial failures have
occurred, the following arguments are believed to play at least a partial role:
1. To avoid setting legal precedent for all parties negatively impacted by illegal
foreclosure;
2. To critically damage the Petitioner’s Intellectual Property/Trade Secret, known as
the “HARIHAR FCS MODEL” – designed to deliver substantial economic growth to
The United States (including substantial relief to illegally foreclosed homeowners
Nationwide); and
3. To cause greater harm and damages to the Petitioner – Mohan A. Harihar.

As a respectful reminder: (1) Formal judicial misconduct (including criminal) complaints have
now been brought against TWENTY-FOUR (24) Federal Judicial Officers including all
NINE (9) Justices of The United States Supreme Court; (2) There has been an unprecedented
NINE (9) RECUSALS associated with this litigation; (3) TREASON claims have been

4
evidenced under ARTICLE III, against NINE (9) Federal Judges AND all NINE (9) Justices
of The United States Supreme Court for ruling without jurisdiction. ALL evidenced claims
against referenced judicial officers remain unopposed. Based on my interpretation of the
Constitution and the Judicial Oath of Office, these evidenced claims show cause for removal
from the bench and potential impeachment (at minimum) under ARTICLES II and III - if left
uncorrected.

Senator Warren, you are aware that I have followed the legal process for addressing judicial
misconduct, only to encounter additional failures within the First Circuit – including: (1) the
Office of the First Circuit Executive; (2) Chief Judge Jeffrey R. Howard; and (3) the Judicial
Council. As a matter of record, these systemic First Circuit failures were necessarily reported to
the Administrative Office of US Courts – specifically to the direct attention of Director James
C. Duff. It appears that still, no corrective action has been initiated.

Now, with the denial of Certiorari Petition No. 18-7752, I have exhausted every level of the
Federal (and State) judiciary available to me as a citizen of The United States. Sadly, this
represents a failed Judicial Branch of Government – witnessed in full view of the American
Public and global community. With the assistance of the internet and social media, I have been
able to report these evidenced claims to the proper government offices/agencies/courts (for
documentation purposes), while also informing the media and the Public– and out of continued
concerns for my personal safety and security.

Senator Warren – if these systemic judicial abuses remain uncorrected, it poses an undeniable
risk to every American. HARIHAR v US BANK et al is now being recognized nationwide as
the most egregious abuse of judicial power in US history. At minimum, it is incumbent upon
the Executive and Legislative Branches to address and initiate corrective action under
ARTICLES II & III. Therefore, I respectfully ask that you bring this serious matter to the
attention of Congress. It will remain my intention to continue the pursuit of civil and criminal
accountability against ALL parties – including judicial officers, regardless of timeline. As a sign
of my continued Good Faith, I am respectfully extending an opportunity for a discussion to
potentially reach a mutual agreement in the referenced lawsuit – HARIHAR v THE UNITED

5
STATES, Appeal No. 17-2074. As part of that discussion, there MAY be an opportunity to
discuss the Intellectual Property Rights to the Trade Secret known as the HARIHAR FCS
MODEL. Considering the magnitude of illegally securitized mortgages & related illegal
foreclosures identified by the DOJ and Federal Bank Regulators (4.2M), successful
implementation of the FCS Model is estimated to: (1) deliver $5T in economic growth to
the US; while (2) delivering substantial relief to all those negatively impacted by illegal
foreclosure.

Please be advised, separate communications regarding these systemic judicial abuses have been
delivered to:
1. President Trump5;
2. SCOTUS6;
3. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts7; and
4. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).8

Senator Warren, thank you in advance for bringing this evidenced National Security matter to the
immediate attention of Congress. I pray that there will be a sense of urgency to address these
evidenced claims, providing a path that initiates corrective action and ultimately restores the
integrity of the Judicial branch of government.

GOD BLESS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE COMMONWEALTH


OF MASSACHUSETTS!

Respectfully,

Mohan A. Harihar
Pro Se Litigant/Illegally Foreclosed Homeowner
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526 (Mobile)
Mo.harihar@gmail.com

5
See Exhibit 2.
6
See Exhibit 3.
7
See Exhibit 4.
8
See Exhibit 5.
6
Exhibit 1

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Exhibit 2

28
A LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

April 25, 2018

President Donald J. Trump


The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20500

RE: TREASON CLAIMS FILED AGAINST SUPREME COURT JUSTICES

Dear Mr. President:

It is with great sadness that I formally bring to your attention (and as required by Federal Law) -
evidenced claims of Treason involving all nine (9) US Supreme Court Justices, pursuant to
ARTICLE III Section 3. Serving as witnesses to these Treason claims are:
1. US Supreme Court Clerk – Scott S. Harris;
2. Deputy Clerk of The Supreme Court – Laurie Wood;
3. All representing counsel of record – associated with the referenced Petition (below),
including the fourteen (14) Respondents themselves.

On Monday, April 15, 2019, the United States Supreme Court published an Order List
indicating the denial of Certiorari Petition No. 18-7752 (HARIHAR v US BANK, et al).9 A
review of the Petition – including its two (2) supplements, identifies jurisdiction (and other)
issues that clearly required correction before proceeding further. The Court was respectfully
informed that any failure to address, clarify and correct these legal issues would ultimately
impact jurisdiction to issue any decision. The Court ignored these evidenced issues, choosing
instead to rule without jurisdiction and deny the Petition without cause. This action therefore, is

9
See Exhibit 1, to view the Notice of Denial, received April 15, 2019, by US Supreme Court Clerk – Scott S.
Harris.
29
considered by definition as “Warring against the Constitution” and an act of Treason under
ARTICLE III, Section 3. Aside from this letter, separate communication is necessarily
delivered to members of Congress as this evidenced crime by judicial officers shows cause for
removal from the bench and potential impeachment under ARTICLE II.

U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Marshall in 1821 wrote: it is “treason on the
constitution” when a judge “usurps [the jurisdiction] that which is not given” – which means
that if a judge makes up law, and claims power that he does not have, it is an act of treason,
Cohens v. Virginia, 6 Wheat. 264, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821). The U.S. Supreme Court re-iterated this
holding in U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200 (1980) by affirming the statement of Chief Justice Marshall
and declaring that violation of law purposely by a judge is unconstitutional.

U.S. Supreme Court judges also decided that it is a “, war on the constitution” when a judge
violates his oath of office to support it [including supporting statutes of a state = due process],
Cooper v. Aaron,358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401(1958).

The Court’s decision exemplifies a continued pattern of corrupt conduct identical to that
evidenced by the lower (Federal and State) courts. As a matter of record, this litigation has now
evidenced – in full public view systemic failures within every level of the Judicial Branch of
Government (Federal and State), including the Supreme Court. Based on these evidenced
systemic failures, HARIHAR v US BANK is now being recognized nationwide as the most
egregious abuse of judicial power in US history. It appears that collectively, the only intention
of the Judicial Branch has been to ultimately arrive at a corrupt and pre-determined outcome.
Any objective observer would agree. As an American-born citizen of The United States, this is
unacceptable. While further investigation is certainly necessary to determine the cause for these
systemic judicial abuses, the denial of Petition No. 18-7752 (at minimum) now strengthens the
following arguments:
1. To avoid setting legal precedent for all parties negatively impacted by illegal foreclosure;
2. To critically damage the Petitioner’s Intellectual Property/Trade Secret, known as the
“HARIHAR FCS MODEL” – designed to deliver substantial economic growth to The

30
United States (including substantial relief to illegally foreclosed homeowners
Nationwide); and
3. To cause greater harm and damages to the Petitioner – Mohan A. Harihar.

On April 19, 2019, an email communication was delivered to Deputy Clerk Laurie Wood
officially informing SCOTUS of these Treason claims. The email also included: (1) a separate
letter to the attention of Chief Justice John Roberts; and (2) a formal criminal complaint
delivered to the attention of the FBI and Department of Justice (DOJ).10

Mr. President, as you know, I have kept your administration regularly updated on this litigation
since you took office.11 Respectfully, you are also aware that the referenced judicial failures –
along with related failures in the Justice Department and Legislative branch of government, have
shown cause to bring an incremental civil complaint against The United States (Referencing,
HARIHAR v THE UNITED STATES, Appeal No. 17-2074). Based on this latest (and VOID)
decision by SCOTUS, there is now cause to amend the original complaint against The United
States, pursuant to (at minimum) Fed. R. Civ. P 60(b)(2), including an expansion of Due
Process and Color of Law violations.

Since the infancy stages of this (8yr) litigation, my intentions have been (and remain) twofold:
1. To recoup damages suffered from my identified illegal foreclosure12; and
2. To ultimately gain alignment with the Federal Government involving my referenced
Intellectual Property/Trade Secret, designed to deliver substantial economic growth to
The United States (including substantial relief to illegally foreclosed homeowners
Nationwide).

Respectfully Mr. President, it was never my intention to evidence corruption at the highest levels
of government and banking. If the law was upheld years ago, I would still be in my home and/or

10
See Exhibit 2
11
Regular updates have been provided to the Trump Administration via email communication
(www.whitehouse.gov) and social media.
12
The referenced Property belonging to Mohan A. Harihar was identified as an illegal foreclosure by: (1) The
Department of Justice (DOJ); (2) MA Attorney General’s Office; and (3) Federal Bank Regulators.
31
a mutual (and fair) legal agreement would have likely been reached between parties. Instead
however, the evidenced failures by all three (3) branches of government bring us to where we are
today - and the entire Nation has been watching. Left uncorrected, a failed judicial system is
threat to every American. It therefore remains my intention to continue the pursuit of civil and
criminal accountability against ALL parties – including judicial officers, regardless of timeline.
It is also incumbent upon the Executive and Legislative Branches to initiate corrective action
under ARTICLES II & III.

Mr. President, as a sign of my continued Good Faith, I am respectfully extending an opportunity


for a discussion to potentially reach a mutual agreement in the referenced lawsuit – HARIHAR v
THE UNITED STATES, Appeal No. 17-2074. As part of that discussion, there MAY be an
opportunity to discuss the Intellectual Property Rights to the Trade Secret known as the
HARIHAR FCS MODEL.13 A copy of the original presentation successfully delivered to former
Vice President Joe Biden is attached for your review.14 Considering the magnitude of illegally
securitized mortgages & related foreclosures identified by the DOJ and Federal Bank Regulators
(4.2M), successful implementation of the FCS Model is estimated to: (1) deliver $5T in
economic growth to the US; while (2) delivering substantial relief to all those negatively
impacted by illegal foreclosure.

I pray that as the leader of our great Nation and head of the Executive Branch, this letter will not
fall on deaf ears and that ultimately, we can work together towards a legal solution that benefits
both parties.

Thank you, Mr. President. I look forward to your response with great anticipation.

13
The HARIHAR FCS model has been previously presented with MERIT to: 1.) The EOP
(former Obama Administration) per the specific request of VP Joe Biden; 2.) Deputy Chief
Counsel (Former) – Gail Laster, House Financial Services Committee; 3.) Senior Economic
Advisor to US Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) – Bruno Freitas; 4.) The Office of former US Congresswoman
Niki Tsongas (D-MA); 5.) The State AG offices of MA and NH; and to CEO Larry Rasky (Rasky Partners, Inc.)
who leads one of the largest and most respected independent public relations and public affairs firms in the nation.
14
See Exhibit 3
32
GOD BLESS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!

Respectfully,

Mohan A. Harihar
Appellant
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526 (Mobile)
Mo.harihar@gmail.com

33
Exhibit 3

34
Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.com>

Formal Treason Claims Filed Against Judicial Officers of the US Supreme


Court
Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.com> Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 1:51 PM
To: Laurie Wood <lwood@supremecourt.gov>
Cc: NewYorkComplaints Dojoig <dojoig.newyorkcomplaints@usdoj.gov>, andrew.lelling@usdoj.gov,
mary.murrane@usdoj.gov, Press@usdoj.gov, "Constituent.services@state.ma.us"
<constituent.services@state.ma.us>, elizabeth_warren@warren.senate.gov,
Nairoby_Gabriel@warren.senate.gov, Nora_Keefe@warren.senate.gov, sydney_levin-
epstein@markey.senate.gov, lori.trahan@mail.house.gov, ayanna.pressley@mail.house.gov,
maura.healey@state.ma.us, jesse.boodoo@state.ma.us, igo-fightfraud@state.ma.us, ma-igo-general-
mail@state.ma.us, chairmanoffice@sec.gov, CommissionerJackson@sec.gov,
CommissionerStein@sec.gov, CommissionerPeirce@sec.gov, david fialkow <david.fialkow@klgates.com>,
kevin.polansky@nelsonmullins.com, "Jeffrey B. Loeb" <JLoeb@richmaylaw.com>, "Murphy, Matthew T."
<mmurphy@casneredwards.com>, kmchugh@harmonlaw.com

Dear Deputy Clerk Wood,

After reviewing the Order List published Monday, April 15, 2019, the DENIAL of Certiorari Petition
No.18-7752 (HARIHAR v US BANK, et al) indicates a continued PATTERN of CORRUPT CONDUCT
now evidenced at EVERY level of the Federal (and State) Judiciary, including this US Supreme
Court. By failing to address/resolve JURISDICTION (and other) issues identified in the referenced
Petition (including its two supplements), all nine (9) Supreme Court Justices acted without the proper
authority to issue such a decision. Based on the Petitioner's interpretation of the law, an order issued
WITHOUT jurisdiction is considered by definition as, "Warring Against the Constitution of The
United States" - an act of TREASON under ARTICLE III, Section 3, and 18 U.S. Code § 2381. As
the Petitioner in this case, I have personally witnessed this act of Treason. Therefore, I am compelled
by Federal Law to report this serious crime directly to the Court and to the President of The United
States. Additionally, please be advised of the following:

1. The referenced decision is considered VOID.


2. As Deputy Clerk of the Supreme Court, you are also considered to have personally witnessed
this act of Treason. Additional witnesses include Scott S. Harris (Clerk), all related
Respondents and their respective Counsel of record. As witnesses, any failure (or refusal) to
report this evidenced act of Treason will warrant bringing MISPRISION of TREASON
claims, pursuant to 18 U.S. Code § 2382.
3. Aside from evidenced Treason claims, the severity of issues associated with this litigation -
including (but not limited to), Economic Espionage, RICO, Fraud on the Court, etc., are
perceived to impact matters of National Security. Therefore, the Department of Homeland
Security and the Secret Service will necessarily be updated.
4. A letter is being delivered via US Mail to the attention of Chief Justice Roberts, informing him
of these evidenced claims (referenced above). A copy of the letter is attached as reference and
for the purpose of officially informing the Court (See Below).
5. Formal criminal complaints are being filed with the FBI and the Department of Justice (DOJ).
US Attorney Andrew Lelling (MA) will be copied directly on this email, as will Assistant US
Attorney Mary Murrane (Representing counsel in the related case - HARIHAR v THE

35
UNITED STATES, Appeal No. 17-2074). A copy of the criminal complaint is attached as
reference (See Below).
6. Copies of this email and referenced documents will be delivered to the attention of President
Trump (via www.whitehouse.gov and social media).
7. The House/Senate Judiciary Committees will be notified separately as this latest
development is interpreted as grounds for REMOVAL FROM THE BENCH and potential
IMPEACHMENT under ARTICLES II and III.
8. The House Financial Services Committee and additional members of Congress will be
updated - as this recent action is related to evidenced financial crimes associated with the US
FORECLOSURE CRISIS.
9. Legislative leaders in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts will be copied directly on this
email. They include: (1) Governor Charlie Baker (R-MA); (2) US Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-
MA); (3) US Senator Ed Markey (D-MA); (4) US Congresswoman Lori Trahan (D-MA); and (5)
US Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (D-MA).
10. All counsel of record will be copied directly on this email.
11. A copy will also be made available to the Public and to media outlets nationwide out of
continued concerns for the Petitioner’s personal safety and security.

Thank you for your attention to this very serious matter.

Mohan a. Harihar

Petitioner – Pro Se
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526 (Mobile)
Mo.harihar@gmail.com

2 attachments
Letter to Chief Justice John G Roberts 4_19_19.pdf
220K
FBI Complaint - Treason Claims - SCOTUS.pdf
181K

36
Exhibit 4

37
April 19, 2019

The Honorable John G. Roberts, Jr.


Chief Justice
United States Supreme Court
One First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543

Dear Chief Justice Roberts,

On Monday, April 15, 2019, the US Supreme Court published an Order List
indicating the denial of Certiorari Petition No. 18-7752 (HARIHAR v US BANK, et
al).15 This decision, issued without clarification, exemplifies what is considered a
continued pattern of corrupt conduct - identical to that evidenced by the lower
(Federal and State) courts. Systemic failures have now clearly been evidenced within
every level of the Judicial Branch of Government (Federal and State). It appears the
intention of the Judicial Branch is to ultimately arrive at a corrupt and pre-
determined outcome. As an American-born citizen of The United States, this is
unacceptable. While further investigation is certainly necessary, the denial of
Petition No. 18-7752 (at minimum) now strengthens the following arguments:

4. To avoid setting legal precedent for all parties negatively impacted by illegal
foreclosure;
5. To critically damage the Petitioner’s Intellectual Property/Trade Secret, known
as the “HARIHAR FCS MODEL” – designed to deliver substantial economic
growth to The United States (including substantial relief to illegally foreclosed
homeowners Nationwide); and
6. To cause greater harm and damages to the Petitioner – Mohan A. Harihar.

See Exhibit 1, to view the Notice of Denial, received April 15, 2019, by US Supreme Court Clerk – Scott S.
15

Harris.
38
Respectfully your Honor, as articulated in the Petition and its two (2) supplements,
the Court was timely notified of jurisdiction issues warranting both clarification and
correction before proceeding. Neither occurred, indicating again – the same pattern of
corrupt conduct evidenced by the lower courts. By failing to resolve these issues, the
Court lacked the jurisdiction to Rule on Certiorari Petition No. 18-7752. Based on the
Petitioner’s interpretation of the law, by ruling without establishing jurisdiction, the
Justices of this United States Supreme Court have (at minimum) collectively,
“Warred against the Constitution,” a violation ARTICLE III, Section 3.

Your Honor, it gives me no pleasure to inform you that formal claims of TREASON
are now brought against you and all nine (9) Justices under ARTICLE III and 18
U.S. Code § 2381. As required by law, serving as witnesses to this act(s) of Treason
are the following parties:

1. US Supreme Court Clerk – Scott S. Harris;


2. Deputy Clerk of The Supreme Court – Laurie Wood;
3. All representing counsel of record – associated with the referenced Petition,
including the fourteen (14) Respondents themselves.

Wherefore, as further grounds, the Petitioner identifies the following (partial) list of
evidenced (and ignored) claims that now mandate additional legal action:

1. Ignoring systemic judicial abuses evidenced at every level of the Federal and
State judiciary – including evidenced (and unopposed) claims against fifteen (15)
federal judicial officers associated with this litigation, and an unprecedented
nine (9) Federal recusals;
2. Continued refusal to address/clarify Jurisdiction issues;
3. Ignoring evidenced Treason claims under ARTICLE III and 18 U.S. Code § 2381;
4. Ignoring evidenced Misprision of Treason claims under 18 U.S. Code § 2382;

39
5. Refusing to exercise judicial discretion by wrongfully denying or unnecessarily
delaying without valid cause, repeated requests for the Court to assist with the
Appointment of Counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915;
6. Refusing to address the evidenced (and unopposed) Fraud on the Court claims
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3), (4) and (6);
7. Refusing to address evidenced unopposed claims of Judicial Fraud on the Court,
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3) and clear violations to the Judicial Code of
Conduct and Judicial Oath;
8. Refusing to address or even acknowledge: (1) the Appellant’s Intellectual
Property (IP) Rights; (2) Evidenced Economic Espionage claims pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1832; and (3) matters believed to impact National Security;
9. Refusing to address identified Due Process Violations, including (but not limited
to) refusing a trial by jury;
10. Ignoring requests for a grand jury;
11. Refusing to address Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 - Deprivation of Rights Under
Color of Law;
12. Refusing to address Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 Conspiracy Against Rights;
13. Refusing to address Title 18, U.S.C., Section 1001 Fraud and False Statements;
14. Refusing to address Title 42 Sec. 1983, Civil action for Deprivation of Rights;
15. Failing to address the Petitioner’s request(s) to Clarify the DOJ’s intention to
enjoin the civil complaint with criminal indictments;
16. Failing to acknowledge the Petitioner’s repeated concerns for his personal
safety and security; and others.

Based on the Petitioner’s interpretation of Federal Law – including ARTICLES II


and III, it now becomes necessary to inform the Executive Branch, specifically –
President Trump of these evidenced violations (Congress will additionally be
informed, including both the House and Senate Judiciary Committees. Criminal
complaints also being filed with the FBI for evidenced criminal claims (referenced
above).

40
Please be advised, based on this latest development and the Petitioner’s
interpretation of the law, Mr. Harihar shows cause to also amend his two (2)
separate complaints: (1) HARIHAR v THE UNITED STATES, Appeal No. 17-207416;
and (2) HARIHAR v CHIEF JUDGE JEFFREY R. HOWARD, et al, Docket No. 18-cv-
11134:

1. The American Public has now witnessed systemic judicial abuses evidenced at
every level of the Federal (and State) Judiciary, including SCOTUS. Therefore,
Mr. Harihar shows cause to amend his original complaint against The United
States;
2. The Judicial abuses now evidenced by Supreme Court Justices also renders
them as Inferior Justices, showing cause to bring a Tort Claim(s) pursuant to
Corpus Juris Secundum 48a via amendment to HARIHAR v CHIEF JUDGE
JEFFREY R. HOWARD (or by filing a new complaint).

The Nation has now witnessed what will ultimately become known as the most
egregious abuse of judicial power in US history. If left uncorrected and this ruling is
allowed to stand - EVERY AMERICAN is at risk - where it has now been evidenced
that EVERY COURT - from the Lowell District Court to the US Supreme Court has
BLATANTLY REFUSED to even ACKNOWLEDGE the LAW.

".... But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same
Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it
is their duty, to throw off such Government, and provide new Guards for their future
security."

- Quoted from The Constitution of The United States

Translation - If there's something wrong, those who have the ability to take action
have the responsibility to take action. I pray that upon receiving this letter, your

16
HARIHAR v THE UNITED STATES – Lower Court Docket No. 17-cv-11109 (US District Court, Boston, MA).
41
Honor will realize these referenced errors and begin to initiate corrective action in
order to repair and rebuild the integrity of the Judicial Branch.

Please be advised, based on the Petitioner’s interpretation of Federal Law, and


considering a portion of his evidenced claims pertain to: (1) Criminal misconduct
involving judicial officers; (2) Economic Espionage - 18 U.S.C. § 1831; (3) Criminal
SEC violations; and (4) matters believed to impact National/ Homeland Security,
copies of this letter are necessarily delivered (via US Mail, E-mail and/or social
media) to:

1. POTUS (via www.whitehouse.gov)17;


2. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
3. US Secret Service;
4. US Inspector General - Michael Horowitz;
5. SEC Chairman - Jay Clayton;
6. US Attorney General William Barr;
7. Admin. Office of US Courts – Director James C. Duff;
8. US Attorney Andrew Lelling (MA);
9. Senate Judiciary Committee;
10. House Judiciary Committee;
11. Governor Charlie Baker (R-MA);
12. US Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA);
13. US Senator Ed Markey (D-MA); and
14. US Congresswoman Lori Trahan (D-MA)

A copy will also be made available to the Public and to media outlets nationwide out
of continued concerns for the Petitioner’s personal safety and security.

17
See Exhibit 2
42
GOD BLESS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!

Respectfully submitted,

Mohan a. Harihar
Petitioner – Pro Se
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526 (Mobile)
Mo.harihar@gmail.com

43
Exhibit 5

44
Filed 04/18/2019

(FULL TEXT)

I, Mohan A. Harihar, complainant in this case, state that the following is true to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

DEFENDANTS: (1) John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States; (2) Clarence
Thomas, Associate Justice; (3) Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice; (4) Stephen G. Breyer,
Associate Justice; (5) Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice; (6) Sonia Sotomayor, Associate
Justice; (7) Elena Kagan, Associate Justice; (8) Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice; (9) Brett M.
Kavanaugh, Associate Justice

CONTACT INFORMATION: SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 1 First


Street, NE, Washington, DC 20543, 202.479.3000 (Phone).

ALLEGATIONS AND SUPPORTING FACTS: The crimes alleged against all nine (9)
Supreme Court Justices have occurred in the timeline associated with the (ongoing) litigation -
HARIHAR v. US BANK et al, Certiorari Petition No. 18-7752.

45
The evidenced allegations conclusively show that on April 15, 2019, the Supreme Court
published an Order List which included a decision to deny Certiorari Petition No. 18-7752
(Referenced above). Absent from this decision was any clarification or corrective action to
jurisdiction (and other) issues identified in two (2) separate supplements to the Petition. The
decision itself, issued without jurisdiction is therefore considered VOID. The Court’s failure to re-
establish jurisdiction now exemplifies a continued and systemic pattern of corrupt conduct that as
a matter of record has been evidenced at every level of the Federal (and State) judiciary.
Collectively, these evidenced claims – for eight (8) years, have been brought to the attention of:
(1) the FBI; (2) DOJ; (3) Congress; (4) The White House; and (5) the American Public. It remains
unclear as to WHY there has yet to be ANY corrective action (including criminal indictments) for
these EVIDENCED crimes.

Based on their 04/15/19 (VOID) decision, all nine (9) Supreme Court Justices stand formally
accused of criminal violations including (but not limited to): (1) Treason under Article III, Section
3 and 18 U.S. Code § 2381; (2) Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud The United States, 18
U.S. Code § 371; (3) ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE (Economic Espionage Act), 18 U.S. Code §
1831; (4) RICO violations, 18 U.S. Code Chapter 96; and (5) Color of Law/Due Process
violations.

The complainant believes that the evidenced allegations against referenced judicial officers show
INTENT (at minimum) to: (1) Avoid setting legal precedent for all parties negatively impacted by
illegal foreclosure; (2) Critically damage the Petitioner’s Intellectual Property/Trade Secret,
known as the “HARIHAR FCS MODEL” – designed to deliver substantial economic growth to
The United States (including substantial relief to illegally foreclosed homeowners Nationwide);
and (3) Cause greater harm and damages to the Petitioner – Mohan A. Harihar. The complainant
believes that upon further investigation, additional claims against the Defendants are likely and
reserves the right to expand upon/file new claims if deemed necessary.

STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CAUSE: The Complainant states that these facts establish
probable cause indicating that (at minimum) the following crimes have occurred: (1) Treason
under Article III, Section 3 and 18 U.S. Code § 2381; (2) 18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to
commit offense or to defraud The United States; (3) ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE (Economic
Espionage Act) 18 U.S. Code § 1831; (4) Color of Law/Due Process violations; and (5) RICO
violations, 18 U.S. Code Chapter 96. Supporting Documents are part of the Court record(s)
associated with the referenced litigation.

Please be advised, the severity of these evidenced claims including Treason are perceived to
impact matters of National Security. Therefore, copies of this criminal complaint are
necessarily delivered to the attention of: (1) POTUS; (2) SCOTUS; (3) The Secret Service/
Department of Homeland Security; (4) Director James C. Duff (Administrative Offices of US
Courts); (5) The DOJ; (6) members of Congress and other appropriate
offices/agencies/committees. The PUBLIC and media sources nationwide will also receive
copies for documentation purposes and out of continued concerns for the Complainant’s
personal safety and security.

46