You are on page 1of 71

Information Systems Related to Technology

Transfer: A Report on Federal Technology

Transfer in the United States

September 1993

NTIS order #PB94-126968
Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ . . . . 1


The Philosophical Gap Between Government and Industry . . . . . . . . . 2
National Concern and Initiatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Congressional Initiatives ... ... D O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Administration Initiatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . 4
TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROCESSES 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Technology -Push Processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Market-Pull Technology Transfer . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . 6
State and Regional Facilitator Programs . . . . . . . . . . . ., . . . . . . . . . 6
Mechanisms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . , , . . 7
Cooperative Agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . . 7
Cooperative Research and Development Agreements . . . . . . , . . 7
R&D Consortia , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . , . . , . , , . . , . . 7
Exchange Programs ., . . . . . . . . ... , . . . . . . . . . . , , . . . . . . 7
User Facility Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... , . . , . . . . , , . . 8
Work-for-Others . , , . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . , . . , . . . . . 8
Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program . . . . . . . . . . 8
Small Business Technology Transfer Pilot (STTR) Program . . . . . 9
Demonstration Projects . , . . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . . . . , . . , . , . . 9
Professional and Trade Associations . . , . . . , . , . . , , , . , . . . . 9
Supporting Organizations and Associations . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . , , , 9
The Technology Transfer Society . . . , . . . . . . . . . . , , . , . , . . 9
The Association of Federal Technology Transfer Executives . . . , 9


TRANSFER ., , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Barriers to technology transfer , . . . . , . . . . . . . . , . , , . , , . , , , , , , . 10
Private Sector Issues , . . , , , . , . . . . . . . , . . , . . . . . . , . . , , . , , , , 10
Awareness . . , . . . , ., ., , ., , . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , , , , , , , , , 10
Poor perception of Commercial Applications . . . . . . . , . , . . . . . 10
Access . . . . . . . . . , , . . . , . . . . . . . . , , . . , , . . . , , , . , . . . 10
Size, Diversity, and Dispersion of Federal Agencies and
Laboratories . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . , , , , , , , 11
Not Invented Here ., , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . 11
Intellectual Property Concerns , . . . . . . . , . . . . . . , . , . . . , . , 11
Reluctance to Deal with Federal Government . . , . . . . . . , . , . . 12
Financing . . , , . , . . . . . . . . , ., . . . . . . , , , . . , . . , , . , . , . . 12
Understanding the Innovation Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . 1 2

Federal Agency/Laboratory Issues . . . . . . ● ☛ ● ☛ ● ✎ ☛ . . . . . ● . . . ● . 13
Mission Priority . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ● ☛ ● ✎ . , . ● ✎ ✎ ● . . ● ● . 13
Funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ● ✎ ● ☛ ● ☛ ● ● ✎ ✎ ● . . ☛ ✎ 13
Security Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ● ✌ ● ** ● ✎ ☛ ✎ ✌ . ✌ ✎ 13
Institutional Barriers and Culture . . ● * . ● ☛ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ● ● ✎ ✎ ● 14
Bureaucratic Barriers . . . . . . . . . . . o* . . ✎ ✎ ● ✎ ● ● ● ✎ 15
Technical Barriers . . . . . . . . . . . . ● . . . ● ☛ ● ✎ ● ✎ ✎ ● ● ✎ ✎ 15

OVERVIEW OF FEDERAL SUPPORT FOR R&D . * . . ● . ● ☛ ● ✎ ☛ ✎ ● ● ● ● ✎ 16

The National Technical Information Service . . . . . . . . ● ☛☛ ● ✎ ✎ ☛ ● ✎ ✎ 17
Federal Research In Process . . . . . . . . . . . . ● ✎☛ ● ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ 18
FEDWORLD . . . . . 0 . . . . . ..0...... . . . ● ☛☛ ✎ ☛ ● ● ✌ ● ● ✎ 18
The Patent Licensing Bulletin Board . . . . . . . ✎ ✎ ✎ ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 18
The Federal Laboratory Consortium . . . . . . . ● ☛☛ ✎ ● ● ✌ ✎ ● ● ● 19
FLC Clearinghouse . . ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ● ● ✎ ✎ ● ✌ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ 20
FLC Training . . , . . , . ., . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . ● ✎ ✎ ✎ ● ✌ ✎ ☛ ● ● ● 20
FLC Publications . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ● ● ☛ ☛ ✎ ✎ ✎ ● 20
FLC Awards Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ● ✎☛ ✎ ✎ 0 ☛ ✎ ● ✎ ✎ 20
The National Technology Transfer Center . . . , . . ** ● ✎ ✎ , ● ● ● ● ✎ 20
The NTTC Gateway . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .* ● ● * ✎ ● , ● ✎ ● ● ● 21
Education and Training Programs . . . . . . . . ● ✎ ● ✎ ✌ * ✎ ● ● ● ✌ 23
Economic Development Programs . . . . . . ✎ ● ✎ * ✎ ● ✎ ● ● 23
NTTC Technology Transfer Services . . . . . ✎ ✎ . ✎ ✎ ✎ ● ● 24
PROGRAMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . ● . ● ✎ ✌ ✎ ● 24
The Department of Commerce (DOC) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ✎ ● ● ✌ ✎ ✎ ✎ 24
The DOC Technology Administration . . . . . . . . . . . , . ● . ✎ ✌ ● ✎ 25
The Clearinghouse for State and Local Initiatives on
Productivity, Technology, and Innovation . . . . . ✎ ● ● ✎ , ✎ ● 25
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST ✎ ✎ ● ✎ ✎ 25
Patent and Trademark Office . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ● ● . ● ● 26
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) ● ● ✌ ✎ ✎ . ✎ ✎ 27
NASA Field Center Offices ... , . . . . . , . . . , , , ● ☛ 9 ● ● ✎ ✌ ☛ ● 27
Regional Technology Transfer Centers . . . . . . . , ● ✎ * ✎ ✎ ● ✎ . ✌ ● 27
Specialized Technology Transfer Centers . . . . . . ● ✌ , ● ● ✎ ● ✎ ● 27
NASA Tech Briefs ., . . . . . . . . ., . . . . . . . . . . ● ● ✎ ✎ ✌ . ● 28
The NASA RECON Information System . . . . . . . ● * ● ✎ ● ✎ ✎ ● ✎ ● 28
NASA Technology Transfer Effectiveness . . . . . , ● ☛ ✎ ✎ . 28
The Department of Defense . . . , , . . . . . . . . . . . , , . ● , ● ☛ ● ● ● ✎ ● 29
The DOD Office of Technology Transition . . , . . , ● * ● ✎ ✎ ● ● ☛ 30
The Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) . ● ✎ ● ✎ ● ● 30



The Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (formerly Strategic
Defense Initiative) Technology Applications Program . .
. . . 32
Advanced Research Projects Agency . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . .
33 ● ✌✎

Technology Transfer in the Military Services . . . . . . . . . . . .

34 ● ✌☛

The Corps of Engineers ., ... , . . . . . . . . , . . , . , , , , , .

34 . 0 ,

The Department of Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... , , , , , . . . 34

The Office of Scientific and Technical Information . . . . . . , .
DOE Technology Transfer Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . 36
Special DOE Technology Transfer Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Department of Health and Human Services , . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . .
PHS Office of Technology Transfer On-Line . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 37
Computer Retrieval of Information on Scientific Projects , , , .
. 37
The U.S. Department of Agriculture , . . , . . , . . . . . , . , . , , , , , .
TEKTRAN - The USDA Technology Transfer Information System
. 38
The Alternative Agricultural Research and Commercialization
Center . . . . . , , ., , .
38 ● ✌ ☛ ✎ ✌ ☛

The Agricultural Inventions Catalog .......................................

The Department of Education . . , , . . , , . . , . . . . . . . . . . . , 38
38 ● ☛ ☛ ✎ ☛ ☛

Rehabilitation Research and Training Centers . . . . . . . .

38 ● 0 , . . .

The Rehabilitation Information System . . . . . . , , , . . . .

The Environmental Protection Agency . , , . . . . . . . , , . , , . . . 39 ● . * * , *

39 ● . , . O O

The Alternative Treatment Technology Information Center

39 . .

The Pollution Prevention Information Clearinghouse . . . .

The Vendor Information System for Innovative Treatment 39 ● . . . * *

- .
Technologies . . . . , . . . .
The Department of Transportation .
. , * , * * * e
. .
. . . . * , * , , ,
. *

. . . . . . . . . . . 40
Other Federal Agencies . . . . . . . . ● , . . , * , * , * * . . . . . . . . . . .
The Critical Technologies Institute . . . 40
. . . . . . . . . . . 40
The CTI Data Base System . * . * * . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . O . , 41 ●

Teltech , , , , , , , ., , , , ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , 41
Knowledge Express . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * , . , 42 ●

Technology Access Report . . . * . , * . . * . * . . . . . , * , 42 ●

Technical Insights, Inc . . . . 8 . . . . . .,...****, 42

Pennsylvania Business Information Center On Line . . . , , , , , , , , 42
Texas Innovation Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Best North America , . , , , , , , , , , , . . . . . . . . , ,
Technology Transfer Search System . . . . , . , . . , ............................43 43
P R O M I N E N T U N I V ERSITY P R O G RAMS . . . . . . . . . . . ..0.0.... , . : 43
The MIT Licensing Office . . , . . . . , . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
Johns Hopkins University Programs . . . . . . . . . , , . . . , , . . . . . 44

Taking a Holistic View ... , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., ✎ . . ● ● ● 46
Current Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ● . . ● ● ✎ 47
Opportunities . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ● . . ✎ ✎ ● ● ✎ 48

Appendix A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ● . * ✎ ✎ ✎ A-1
TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER , , ., ., , , , ., ., ., , ., , ... , ., . . . ✎ . . ● ✎ ✎ . A-1

Appendix B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., ., . . ✌ ● ✎ ● ✎ B-1
THE NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER CENTER . , . . , . ● ✌ ● * . ✎ ✎ ● ● . B-1

Appendix C . . . . . . . . . . . . . ● ☛ ● ☛ ☛ ☛ ✎ ☛ . . . , ● ☛ ● . , . * . . ✎ ✎ ✎ . c-1

THE INNOVATION PROCESS . ● ☛ ● 9 ● , . , ✎ ✎ * . . * . ✎ ● ● . c-1

GLOSSARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . ● ✎ . . . . . . . . ● * . . ● 0 ● . ● ✎ ✎ ● c-2

REFERENCES ., . . . . . . . . . . ● ☛ , ........ . . . . . . , . . ✎ . ✎ ✎ ✎ . Ref-i


This report examines all aspects of domestic technology transfer in the United States.
The introduction provides a perspective on meanings of technology transfer, its
importance to the economic development of the Nation, and legislative initiatives
concerning the process. The overview of Federal support for Research and
Development (R&D) describes the prominent agencies and cross-cutting organizations
principally involved in technology transfer and their programs and information
systems. Most Federal R&D programs produce technical documentation and
publications, some of which are also provided in printed form to the National Technical
Information Service (NTIS). These same agencies are cooperating with the National
Technology Transfer Center (NTTC) to consolidate the information systems resources
in electronic format to make them readily accessible to business and industry.

Commercial technology transfer programs provide a wide range of services ranging

from on-line access to more tailored hands-on approaches. Some of these commercial
services add value to the technology transfer process via interaction with technical
analysts (as does the NTTC). Commercial programs are more suited to large
companies as the rates for their services are usually beyond the capability of many
small businesses to afford them.

There is a significant amount of cooperation among the major Federal R&D Agencies,
the Federal Laboratory Consortium, and the Federal Laboratories in providing resource
information to the National Technology Transfer Center. The capabilities of the
laboratories to follow through on requests, however, are hampered by insufficient
funding and mission priorities.

Options for enhancing the technology transfer process lie not with the establishment
of more programs, but rather with support for the effective ones that are in place.
This includes continued support of the NTTC in its role of becoming a “one-stop-shop”
to access the Nation’s technology and in providing better support for the
infrastructure elements such as extension programs and entrepreneur centers who can
provide the expertise and linkages to support commercialization activities of small and
medium sized business and industry,

A Report on the Organizations, Mechanisms, and Barriers

to Technology Transfer
in the
United States


The Federal government will spend approximately $70 billion for Research and
Development (R&D) this year through Federal laboratories, universities, and
companies. This vast expenditure of resources addresses virtually every area of
science and engineering. Harnessing the leading edge technology developed by this
investment can be a major factor in driving the engine of the National economy
and bolstering America’s competitive posture in the international marketplace.

While this technology may seem to be readily available for commercial use, there
are many barriers that prevent its easy movement from the Federal to the Private
Sector. Among those barriers are a lack of awareness of the R&D, a
misunderstanding of its potential applications to commercial use, a means to
access technology information, and the capital to fund the commercialization
process. These barriers are compounded by others such as issues with intellectual
property rights, concern for national security, and institutional barriers.

“Technology Transfer” is a complex topic that has various meanings to different

audiences, To industry it could mean loss of proprietary technical information to a
competitor or the licensing of a new technology which could be used to increase
productivity or introduce a new product. To the military or the state department, it
could be connected with helping an ally to introduce advanced weapon systems for
cooperative defense; but is more likely to be construed as meaning the loss of a
national security-sensitive technology to a potential adversary via espionage or a
breach in security,

In the purest sense of the meaning, Technology Transfer is the process by which
technology, knowledge and/or information developed in one organization, for one
purpose is applied and utilized in another organization, in another area, for another

For Federal organizations, this could mean:

● Use of technology from outside the government for a government

purpose (Technology Infusion)

● The movement of technology developed by one Federal agency to use
in another (Technology Transfusion), or

● The movement of technology from the Federal government to the

private sector (Technology Diffusion). When applied to American
business and industry only, this is most commonly known as
Domestic Technology Transfer.

This report focuses on the process of Federal Domestic Technology Transfer and
the organizations and mechanisms that foster this process. It discusses the
barriers in detail, and discusses options for improving the process including the
case for a centralized, user friendly, information system.


It is not easy to transfer Federally-sponsored technology from the laboratory and

innovator’s workbench to the marketplace or public sector programs.

The Philosophical Gap Between Government and Industry

One of the most fundamental barriers is the philosophical gap between the
missions of the federal scientific and technical community which does R&D and the
motivations of the private sector companies and entrepreneurs who would invest in
the commercialization of products and processes which could result from that

Being more technologically-driven organizations, the federal laboratories and

scientific and technical centers make large investments in research and
development facilities and have a primary interest in achieving and maintaining a
technological superiority. With these goals in mind, they develop technology as
the main source of their activities and establish a technology base long before they
have a product application.

Being more market-driven, by contrast, private sector companies and entrepreneurs

tend more to analyze current and secondary markets in order to predict what types
of products will yield a high profit. Based on these analyses, they then develop
focused product concepts and make the required investments to produce them.

Because they operate based on different drivers, federal research and development
centers and private sector companies frequently talk at each other rather than to
each other. The federal research and development centers, being more
technologically driven, need not have commercial product divisions, nor are they

required to understand the makeup of private sector markets. However, if they
want to make the technology transfer process work, they must actively solicit the
interest of private sector firms that not only have commercial product divisions but
also desire to make products that will be profitable. Because of this difference in
orientation, it is frequently difficult to establish the lines of public-to-private sector
communication needed to transfer technology.

Complicating this communication problem are barriers inherent in the transfer of

federally-funded technologies to other public sector programs. These include
bureaucratic inertia, a lack of up-to-date information about research activities
funded through that federal agency’s programs, and intellectual property issues
associated with the release of proprietary information about products and
processes developed by contractors for that agency.
These barriers--the different drivers motivating public and private sector research
and development organizations and the problems associated with public-to-public
sector technology transfer efforts--strike at the heart of the challenge Federal
agencies face in working to transfer sponsored technologies to the private sector
and end-use conservation programs, To bridge these gaps requires a people-to-
people technology transfer approach which gets the potential consumer, those
groups or individuals with a requirement that can be filled with a Federally-funded
technology, to speak with the supplier of that technology, the laboratory or
innovator who received Federal funds to do the research and development work
required to create the technology.

National Concern and Initiatives

Traditionally, technology transfer from the Federal Government to industry and

especially small business has been a challenge due to many factors. There is a
general lack of awareness among many small and medium sized companies of the
benefits that new technology could bring to the productivity of the company or in
creating new product lines. Even with a general awareness that Federal
laboratories and other agencies spend billions of dollars annually in research and
development, the perception persists that the resulting technology base is of little
use to the private sector. Compounding these barriers is a general problem with
accessing technology due to the size and dispersion of federal agencies,
laboratories, and resources; security and intellectual property issues; and the
accompanying reluctance of business to deal with the bureaucratic elements of

● Congressional Initiatives

The Congress, keenly aware of these issues, has recently enacted a number of
legislative initiatives to foster the transfer of technology from the Federal
government to the private sector. Most of this legislation has focused on
measurable means of technology transfer such as the number of patents issued,
license agreements signed, or Cooperative Research and Development Agreements
(CRADAs) established. While these mechanisms of technology transfer are primary
tools, there is a great amount of evidence to support the fact that American
business and industry also need access to the expertise in government to help
them answer technical questions that do not require the cumbersome process
associated with intellectual property protection and cooperative agreements.

In an attempt to help technology transfer efforts, the Congress and the Executive
Branch have taken a number of steps to create law and policy to break down the
barriers. These include!

The Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980

Patent and Trademark Amendment Act of 1982 (Bayh-Dole Act)
The Small Business Development Act of 1982.
The Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986 (FTTA).
Presidential Executive Order 12591, of April 10, 1987. “Facilitating
Access to Science and Technology”
● The Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988
● The National Competitiveness Technology Transfer Act of 1989
● Provisions of the Defense Authorization Act for FY 1991
● The Small Business Technology Transfer Act of 1992
● Provisions of the Defense Authorization Act for FY 1993

● Administration initiatives

The last administration promoted the use of Federal technology for commercial
applications through the National Technology Initiative (NTI). This effort involved
cabinet-level briefings and conferences throughout the country to encourage the
interaction of business and industry with the federal agencies and laboratories.
The conferences indicated a high level of interest on the part of industry to
cooperate with Federal agencies in R&D, but also indicated that for success, the
research needed to be complimented with manufacturing excellence, the
availability of investment capital, and aggressive marketing on the part of
government agencies. The NTI report indicated a need to improve access to
technology, to overcome the bureaucratic and institutional barriers, to improve the
availability of long-term patient capital, and support programs that foster

manufacturing excellence . The NTI reportedly forged a stronger public/private
partnership for technological competitiveness and formed the basis for subsequent
action on a range of issues important to the innovation process. It created a wider
awareness of the existence of technology available for commercialization from the
Federal government and laid groundwork for future efforts of the next

One of the current administration’s first policy declarations was “Technology for
America’s Economic Growth, A New Direction to Build Economic Strength" . This
policy signaled a major change in the support of the government for activities such
as technology transfer as a key element in America’s economic future. The current
Technology Reinvestment Project’, based on provisions of the FY 93 Defense
Authorization Act, focuses directly on this issue with the involvement of the five
primary Federal R&D Agencies.

Thus, the interest in technology transfer and commercialization has blossomed

from a little known entity to a major visible element of National Economic Policy.
Given the existence of the technology and the legislation to promote its use, it
would be useful to next examine the processes for technology transfer.


Technology Transfer activities are generally categorized as either Technology Push

or Market Pull. Technology Push is the solution in search of a problem, while
Market or Requirements Pull addresses a problem in need of a solution. The latter
is generally a much more successful approach to initiating technology transfer

Technology-Push Processes

Technology-push methods are used to facilitate the people-to-people aspect of the

technology transfer process. This is done by identifying technologies already
developed for Federal Agencies and providing the interested party with information
about these technologies, This information is supplied to initiate a process
whereby that party can contact the developers of the technologies to find out if
the emerging Federal technology of interest can be used in the research,
development, or commercialization of other new products or processes.

Technology-push mechanisms used in this process may include the development of

database referral services which provide information about current federally-funded
efforts and their applications for other private and public sector purposes.
Outreach programs can also be established which publish newsletters, brochures,

and reports that publicize Federal technology transfer services or describe new
Federally-developed technologies and their applications for other research,
development, and commercialization efforts.

Market-Pull Technology Transfer

Market or Requirements-pull methods of technology transfer involves the analysis

and assessment of uses and markets for Federally-funded technology. Using these
methods, Federal Agencies can evaluate and determine what will make their
sponsored technology more attractive to the individual or organization using it for
other private or public sector requirements. This can be done by matching
existing technology requirements that potential consumers might have with a set
of Federally-developed technologies that can be integrated or customized to meet
those requirements.

Market-pull methods used in this process can include the organization of

conferences and advisory panels that meet to review technology efforts coming
from Federally-funded projects; identify potential applications for these
technologies to the private sector and federal, state, and local government
agencies; and provide guidance on the means by which this transfer takes place.
These advisory panels may include panelists representing such diverse
communities as academia, industry, professional associations, research institutes,
and the federal R&D establishment.

State and Regional Facilitator Programs

The interface between technology transfer programs and State, local, and regional
economic development programs is an essential part of technology transfer.
Interaction and leverage with organizations such as Small Business Administration-
supported Small Business Development Centers (SBDCs), State extension
programs, university entrepreneurship centers and incubators, technology
councils, and state economic development organizations provides a superior
infrastructure for Federal technology to reach small and medium sized businesses
throughout the nation. These organizations have the highest potential to be
facilitators in technology transfer, yet many of them are not knowledgeable in the
essential elements of technology development and commercialization. Many also
lack staff trained to understand client’s technical needs or to search out potential
sources of assistance in the Federal government.

There are numerous mechanisms for technology transfer employed by the Federal
Agencies, Laboratories, and Centers. Not all organizations employ or exploit every
mechanism. The most well known mechanisms include:

Cooperative Agreements - instruments entered into by the government with

industry, universities, and others to support or stimulate research;
agreements are cost-shared with the non-federal participant.

Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADAs or CRDAs) -

agreements formed under the provisions of the FTTA between government
and non-federal parties in which both participants provide personnel,
services, facilities, or equipment for the conduct of specified R&D, The non-
federal parties may also provide funds (no direct funding is provided by the
laboratory or center). Rights to inventions and other intellectual property are
negotiated between laboratory and participant, and certain data may be
protected from disclosure for up to five years.

R&D Consortia - multiple federal and non-federal parties working together for
a common R&D objective, Funding for R&D consortia may be shared, but
usually no funds are exchanged between participants.

Exchange Programs - arrangements allowing government or laboratory staff

to work in industry facilities and industry personnel to work in government
laboratories to exchange technical capabilities and support research in
specific areas. Costs are borne by the organization sending the personnel.
Intellectual property arrangements can be addressed in exchange

Patent Licensing Agreements - the transfer of less than ownership rights in

intellectual property, such as a patent or a software copyright, to permit its
use by the licensee. Licenses can be exclusive or non-exclusive, for a
specific field of use or for a specific geographical area. The potential
licensee usually must present plans for commercialization. In many cases,
such action can result in the creation of a new “spinoff company” which is
based solely on the licensed technology. Examples of this rapid
commercialization can be found in the 22 new companies spawned over the
past six years through licensing of technology produced by the Strategic
Defense Initiative.

● User Facility Agreements - arrangements permitting private parties to
conduct R&D in a laboratory. For proprietary R&D, the laboratory is paid for
the full cost of the activity. If the work will be published, cost can be
adjusted. Intellectual property rights generally belong to the user.

● Work-for-Others - agreements whereby proprietary work for an industry may

be conducted by technically qualified government laboratory staff using
laboratory facilities with the full cost charged to the client industry. The
- s
intellectual property generally belongs to the industry spon or. The
government usually retains a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to such
intellectual property.

● Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program - mandated under the

Small Business Innovation Development Act, and its reauthorization under
P.L. 99-443 and PL 102-564, the SBIR programs are specifically oriented to
technology transfer. The following agencies are currently participating in the
SBIR program:

-. Department of Agriculture
-. Department of Commerce
-. Department of Defense
-. Department of Education
-. Department of Energy
-. Department of Health and Human Services
-. Department of Transportation
-. Environmental Protection Agency
-. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
-. National Science Foundation
-. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Phase Ill of the SBIR Program is specifically oriented toward the

commercialization of the technology developed in phases I and II for
government purposes. These technologies make up a significant part of the
national technology base and should be considered fruitful areas for Federal
Technology Transfer Programs,

Information on SBIR-sponsored technology available for commercialization

from all Federal programs is made available through the NTTC.

● Small Business Technology Transfer Pilot (STTR) Program

The new STTR Program, mandated under PL 102-564, specifically

provides for a process similar to the SBIR program for the commercialization
of Federally-sponsored technologies. The objective of this program is to
involve small businesses with not-for-profit organizations in licensing new
Federal technologies and commercializing them into products and processes
for industry. This program becomes effective in FY 94, and agencies
affected are currently developing implementing policies and procedures.

● Demonstration Projects - funded by technology transfer organizations

including regional FLC managers to show the viability of a process,
procedure, or outreach mechanism for technology transfer. These may
involve cooperative agreements with state, local or regional economic
development groups, universities, small businesses, or not-for-profit

● Professional and Trade Associations - these organizations provide access to

audiences with interests in specific types and applications of technology.
Interface between technology transfer managers and these organizations
provides a capability to combine the best features of Market Pull and
Technology Push activities,

Supporting Organizations and Associations

There are several organizations which support the profession of technology


● The Technology Transfer Society is the National organization with chapters

across the country who focus on the professional development of
Technology Transfer managers. The T2 Society provides its members with a
monthly newsletter, a quarterly journal, an annual symposium, a directory of
members, and reduced rates on selected professional books and periodicals
related to technology transfer.
● The Association of Federal Technology Transfer Executives (AFT E)is a
newly formed organization that supports activities oriented toward
professional development which supplement the training and networking
activities of the FLC,

Barriers to technology transfer

There are a number of barriers which must be overcome in successfully

transferring technology from the Federal Government to the private sector. These
barriers can best be seen from the perspective of the two groups. It is
acknowledged that most of these issues are perceptions, but when it comes to
technology transfer, perception on the part of the private sector is the major

Private Sector Issues

● Awareness

From the perspective of the private sector, there is little awareness of the
technology available from the Federal government and a poor perception of how it
could apply to the needs of most businesses and industry. To address the
awareness issue, it is paramount that technology transfer programs pursue a
proactive outreach program, using all means available to reach potential users of
advanced technology.

● Poor Perception of Commercial Applications

Both the general public and business have a poor perception of the value and
application of Federal technology, especially that which comes from Defense and
Aerospace-related R&D. The technologies are deemed as too sophisticated and
expensive to have basic applications, even though programs as the Strategic
Defense Initiative have spun off such practical applications as air bag switches,
brighter brake lights, and higher efficiency spark plugs for automobiles to better
medical imaging diagnostics,

● Access

Up until recently, access to new technology information was hampered by the

diversity and dispersion of information throughout the Federal government.
Industry could obtain technical reports from NTIS, but for the most part, the
leading edge technology developed by the DOD, DOE and NASA was not available
to those who did not have an existing contract with these agencies. The FLC
attempted, though its Administrator function, to make referrals to the appropriate
federal laboratories which had expertise in a given area. The ORTA staff at these

laboratories relied on their phone directories and personal knowledge of what
research was being done in the lab , but there was no consolidated information
system that contained a full range of R&D and technology from the Federal
laboratories. For the most part, industry - especially that which was not defense-
related - was left out in the cold in terms of accessing most of the advanced
technology so important to its advancement.

In the latter part of the 1980’s, with the advent of the FTTA and advancements in
computer capabilities, various organizations began to develop information systems
internally which cataloged various R&D efforts and technology. With these
developments, many of the agencies relied then, and even today on paper
publications to disseminate information on R&D and technology. The capability of
business and industry to quickly find technology and expertise, whether assisted or
through computer access, is only a very recent phenomena.

● Size, Diversity, and Dispersion of Federal Agencies and Laboratories

Another barrier to technology transfer from the perspective of industry is the vast
diversity and geographic dispersion of Federal resources. Companies (particularly
small businesses) are more prone to work with an laboratory which is in their
neighborhood than one on the other coast, If the laboratory in the neighborhood
happens to deal in technology that is applicable to the business, there is a chance
for collaboration, If not, the virtual size and dispersion of the Federal laboratory
system is a major deterrent,

● Not Invented Here (NIH)

Pride of ownership, while it may not be practical, plays a major role in deterring the
adoption of new technology. Especially in large corporations, the perspective is
that internally-generated inventions and technology are far superior to whatever
could be created in some government laboratory.

● Intellectual Property Concerns

Rights to inventions and technology are a principal factor in deterring technology

transfer, The process starts when companies, under federal contracts, create a
new technology and do not disclose it so that it can be retained for internal use.
Government enforcement of disclosures under Federal contract provisions is poor,
thus much new technology is retained and not disclosed by corporations unless
there is a proactive attempt on the part of the government sponsor to help in the
spin-off and application of the technology to other markets.

Government claims to royalty-free use of technology developed in cooperative
efforts is also a deterrent to many companies and investors who perceive that their
investment in a cooperative venture may not have enough pay-off if it must be
shared with the Government.

● Reluctance to Deal with Federal Government

Willingness to deal with the Federal bureaucracy, in the face of mountains of

paperwork, legal clauses, lengthy processing times, and bureaucratic attitudes are
a major deterrent to small and medium size businesses. For this reason, extension
activities, professional and trade associations, and small business centers are the
most effective ways to reach the “grass root” companies of America.

* Financing

By far, the most significant issue in any commercialization effort is financing. The
availability of investment capital is the primary determinant in any
commercialization effort. Perspectives of large corporations are based on short-
term return on investment, thus they are loathe to invest in potentially risky, long-
term technology adaptations based on a technology not created within the
corporation. Small businesses simply may not have the capital resources to invest
in new technology commercialization. For these reasons, any attempt at
technology transfer must be based on a sound business plan which includes a
market assessment, intellectual property protection, and a commercialization plan
which addresses every phase of the commercialization process.

● Understanding the Innovation Process

Another significant barrier to successful technology transfer and commercialization

is a lack of understanding of the complexity of the innovation process, especially
by small businesses, Most technology available for transfer from the Federal
government is in the pre-product stage and requires a considerable amount of
technical expertise, investment, marketing, and sound business management to
bring it to the marketplace (see Appendix C). Most technology transfer facilitators
(staff of SBDCs, MTCs, etc.) do not have a sufficient understanding of the process
to permit them to give adequate assistance to small business entrepreneurs who
may wish to develop a new technology into a product.

Federal Agency/Laboratory Issues

● Mission Priority

Much of the time, the ability of a Federal Agency or Laboratory is hampered by the
basic fact that the primary mission precludes the investment of time or resources
to adequately respond to the demands for technology transfer activities. This
institutional barrier of primary mission conflict is especially apparent in DOD and
some DOE laboratories. Based on the recent internal study, even many NASA
activities do not perceive that technology transfer is a primary responsibility. Some
of the larger laboratories and centers have recognized the importance of
technology transfer to their own survival in the new economic environment and
more are beginning to see the relevance and importance of this activity to the
economic survival of the Nation.

● Funding

Funding of activities is, of course, the major factor in allocation of resources to

technology transfer activities. Laboratory ORTAs have been traditionally
under-funded and understaffed to provide adequate support for technology transfer
activities. In many cases, the single individual assigned to perform ORTA functions
has other responsibilities as well, including management of SBIR activities, public
affairs, and/or information security functions. Often these jobs create a conflict of
interest between disseminating information to the public while being responsible
for protecting it, Even at the top levels of management in technology transfer, the
individuals responsible for policy and implementation of programs at the Secretariat
level in several branches of the military are not provided with adequate staff,
support or travel funds.

Funding of CRADA expenses within the laboratories is not consistent across

agencies, DOE, for instance, designates laboratory funding to support CRADA
efforts that covers salaries, use of facilities, etc.; some DOD activities do not. This
disparity causes an imbalance in the effectiveness of technology transfer efforts
among agencies and is a deterrent to technology transfer in agencies where the
private sector CRADA partner must pay for dedicated government personnel and
other expenses.

● Security Issues

Security concerns form a major barrier to technology transfer from the DOD and
parts of the DOE and NASA. To most agencies and offices in the Pentagon,

“Technology Transfer” literally means the leakage of vital military technology to
potential adversaries and thus, most offices with “technology transfer” in their
mission are there to prevent it from happening. Almost every report and
publications from the DoD dealing with technology transfer up until very recently
has focused on stories of espionage and the constant threat to our security by
overt and covert actions of our potential adversaries.

Classified programs in DoD and DOE automatically create a mind set that all
elements and technical developments within a classified program are also
unequivocally classified. While the many components and subsystems of a military
or nuclear system contribute to the overall system, many in and of themselves are
not and should not be classified when broken out from the system. More
appropriately, the subsystem and components - or perhaps the processes used to
create them - should be properly protected, but not necessarily by classification.
Designation as a military or space critical technology to prevent export is much
more appropriate and also facilitates transfer of the technology to other
unclassified applications in Federal programs and the private sector while still
protecting the technology from leaking off shore. This can easily be accomplished
under legislation and policy established for the export control of militarily critical
technology established by Congress in 1983 .

● Institutional Barriers and Culture

couched in a culture of secrecy with regard to technology sharing, other agencies

have different perspectives,

While success of technology transfer in the DoD is limited by the institutional

mindset and culture, this is not a unique situation to the DoD. Cultural
perspectives on technology transfer vary among federal agencies. To illustrate, it is
interesting to look at the perspective of the medical research community
associated with NIH. Before the FTTA of 1986, academically-oriented NIH
scientists shared the fruits of their research freely with non-profit organizations,
universities, and industry without regard to the legalities of patents and license
agreements. With the advent of the FTTA, scientists and researchers were
burdened with a bureaucratic process that they found to be complicated, poorly
understood, and too legalistic. Most of the scientific community reacted with a
“too hard to work” attitude toward the FTTA requirements and continue to believe
that this new legislated bureaucracy hinders technology transfer, scientific
research, and the free exchange of ideas in an academic environment.

University technology transfer programs face other cultural issues and institutional
barriers. The primary perspective of university faculty is to research, not develop
products. The focus is to fund long term research programs that support graduate
students and faculty members over several years. This mindset directly conflicts
with the objectives of some state economic development organizations who
attempt to fund cooperative R&D programs through universities. Businesses want
fast results - Academia wants to study the problem. Academia needs to “publish
or perish” - Industry wants to have intellectual property rights before it makes large
investments in commercialization activities. Also, it must be recognized that
university technology is very embryonic. Industry looks for ready-to-market
technology only to be disappointed that considerable development and investment
is needed to take the technology through the prototype to the market. For this
reason, the effectiveness of technology transfer programs from universities are
somewhat hampered, yet many do succeed in spite of the odds.

● Bureaucratic Barriers

In addition to institutional and cultural barriers, the basic bureaucratic processes

related to technology transfer are formidable. Concerns about conflict of interest,
micromanagement of laboratory activities, legal concerns, negotiations over
potential value, exclusive rights, and other factors cause significant delays and
considerable legal expense to the transferee in the processing of CRADAs and
license agreements. Often the time required to process is sufficient to miss a
major market penetration opportunity. Most prominent in the bureaucratic process
is DOE, whose centralized CRADA administration activities have drawn criticism
and led the GAO to conclude that “Despite the strong motivation by DOE’s
headquarters to control the CRADA implementation process and to ensure the
laboratories’ survival, the centralized process of implementing a CRADA appears to
have left the considerable technology transfer potential of the technical resources
at DOE’s laboratories unrealized ”.’

● Technical Barriers

Technical barriers to information dissemination with regard to technology transfer

have all but disappeared in the last decade due to the advancement of computer-
based information technology. Today, data bases of information are maintained in
electronic format by virtually every agency, even if the data is in the form of
publications. Even the existence of two industry standards (DOS vs Apple) no
longer causes a problem in integrating data. Powerful search software has been
developed and is in use to rapidly scan millions IS of documents for keywords,
phrases, and combinations of information. Access to these systems is easily
obtained via computer modems which have become an embedded component of

most PC’s on the market or can be added inexpensively. Even if the information is
only available in printed form, scanning technology can easily convert it to
computer formatted information which can be indexed, stored, and retrieved by
retrieval software.

Access by Personal Computers with modems have revolutionized information flow.

Any individual with a modem-equipped PC has a preponderance of data bases,
information services, and bulletin boards available free or at nominal cost which
can provide access to almost any type of information.

Having the information readily available in a searchable system, however is only

one step in making it accessible. Most corporations and small businesses are not
trained in searching for information and can easily be overwhelmed by the volume
of information available. Also, there is still a large percentage of the adult
population which is computer illiterate. For these potential users, seeking
technology and assistance through an intermediary such as a Small Business
Development Center, a Regional Technology Transfer Center, or commercial
assistance service can be more effective than long, perhaps fruitless search
efforts, on-line. For this reason, the federal data bases and systems serve the
assisting organizations better than the general public, and the service organizations
play an important role as an intermediary. Documents, such as those available from
NTIS, are also more appropriate for these clients.


The research and development activities of the United States Government are vast
and diverse, touching almost every conceivable area of technology that contributes
to what is known as the National Technology Base. The sources of this
technology come from both internal R&D programs conducted at the Nation’s
many R&D Centers and Laboratories and from the external R&D conducted through
contracts and grants at American as well as foreign corporations and universities.

it is important to note, when considering technology transfer issues, that many

Federal R&D activities are mission-oriented and are not in existence to produce
spin-offs for commercial purposes. This is particularly true of the DOD, some DOE
programs and NASA. Other agencies, such as the Environmental Protection
Agency and the Federal Aviation Administration are regulatory in nature, therefore
their R&D is also mission-oriented.

The technological resources of the National Technology Base include not only the
technology itself, but also the expertise and know-how of thousands of scientists,
technicians, and technical managers, A third element of this base is the diverse

number of unique laboratory and testing facilities that is also a part of the Nation’s
technological resource. All these resources - technology, expertise, and facilities -
are elements in the technology transfer equation and the key to America’s
technological and economic strength as well as its National security.

Because the elements of this national resource are centered in a number of

agencies as diverse as the technologies they spawn, the most effective way to
describe the Federal support for R&D and the information that is associated with it
is by examining the principal agencies involved and the programs that each has in
place to carry out technology transfer. These programs, in general, all attempt to
address the barriers to technology transfer and some are more effective than
others due to the effects of mission and culture.

Every agency in the United States Government that sponsors R&D has some
programs in place to systematically collect information on the technology
produced. The majority of the agencies use the data and report collection
capabilities of the National Technical Information Service (NTIS) to collect and
provide the public with access to the technology that they generate. There are a
few exceptions: The Department of Defense, which is concerned with National
Security Issues; the Department of Energy which also has a concern with nuclear
security issues; and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, which has
a concern about Aerospace critical technology. Because of their missions, and the
need to protect mission critical technology from public disclosure and adverse
“technology transfer” to potential adversaries, these agencies have their own
collection and documentation programs that are described below.

Two other driving forces in national technology transfer are The National
Technology Transfer Center (NTTC) and the Federal Laboratory Consortium (FLC).
These organizations work closely together to simplify access to federal technology,
expertise, and resources throughout the federal system. The NTTC and the FLC
are described in further detail in the next section.


The National Technical Information Service (NTIS)

The results of Federally-funded R&D are documented in tens of thousands of

technical reports and papers each year. The primary repository responsible for
collecting those reports that are public-releasable (not military or space critical, or
classified) is the U.S. Government’s central technical information clearinghouse,
the National Technical Information Service of the U.S. Department of

NTIS is the central source for the public sale of U.S. Government - sponsored
research documentation. Currently the collection incorporates over two million
works covering research and development, business and management, translations
of foreign reports, trade, general statistics, health and social sciences, and
hundreds of other areas. It should be noted that NTIS topic coverage is world
wide, with nearly one-third of new additions to the collection coming from foreign
sources .

As a cornerstone of the technological publishing structure in the United States,

NTIS is a key participant in the development of advanced information products and
services. In addition to printed reports, NTIS makes information available on tape,
diskette, and optical disk. Specific services relevant to technology transfer are:

● Federal Research In Process (FEDRIP)

NTIS maintains a data base of Federal Research In Process. This

information is made available to the NTTC and several commercial
computer modem data access networks including DIALOG and
Knowledge Express. Use of this system is suitable to a
knowledgeable database researcher who can find needed information
quickly, thus keeping on-line expenses reasonable; but use of these
commercial services is expensive for an untrained small business to


NTIS has recently opened a free computer modem accessible gateway to

over 100 Federal Bulletin Boards. This system, known as FEDWORLD,
offers access to a wide spectrum of information ranging from environmental
policy and hazardous waste disposal to the National Science Foundation’s
Science and Technology lnformation .

● The Patent Licensing Bulletin Board (PLBB)

The PLBB is an electronic bulletin board system operated by NTIS. The

bulletin board provides the earliest possible information about hundreds of
new Government R&D inventions available for licensing. The information is
supplied by only seven agencies, and noticeably absent from the list are
DOD, DOE, and NASA. It is available at no change . Information is
searchable in ten major subject categories:

● Biology and Medicine

● Chemistry
● Electro-technology
● Food Technology
● General
● Instruments
● Mechanical Devices and Equipment
● Metallurgy
● Nuclear Technology
● Optics and Lasers

NTIS has established a Memorandum of Understanding with the NTTC to share

R&D program and technology information obtained through the NTTC’S interface
with Federal R&D Agencies.

While NTIS serves a very useful documentation function for the Nation, it cannot
be considered as a principal facilitator of technology transfer. NTIS does not
provide direct assistance to the public or referrals to federal agencies. As such,
while there is a wealth of information available at NTIS for purchase, using NTIS
has several drawbacks. Secondly, Federal system is slow to make information
available to NTIS, which then must be cataloged and processed; thus the most
current technical reports available may be a year or more old. Synopses of research
in progress may be so synoptic that the true nature and value of the research can
be obscure to the untrained seeker. Finally, the publications made available from
NTIS must be purchased to be reviewed or used and may or may not be pertinent
to a researcher; this serves as a deterrent to access, especially by small business.
Many of these problems are inherent because NTIS must rely on other agencies to
obtain its information, and the bureaucratic processes are slow. Also due to the
fact that it deals primarily with publications, NTIS cannot be considered a rapid
access method for finding a technical solution to a problem. Finally, as a side
issue relating to Federal agencies interface with the private sector that could result
in technology transfer, many government agencies find it more convenient to refer
business and industry inquiries to NTIS rather than deal directly with inquiries of a
technical nature.

The Federal Laboratory Consortium

A principal Federally-chartered organization critical to technology transfer is the

Federal Laboratory Consortium (FLC) which was established by the Stevenson-
Wydler Act of 1980, The FLC is a network of technology transfer professionals
located principally in the laboratories and R&D Centers whose primary function is
to facilitate technology transfer through Offices of Research and Technology

Applications (ORTAs) which are mandated to be at all laboratories with over 200
scientific and engineering personnel.

● FLC Clearinghouse

The contracted FLC Administrator in Sequim, Washington operates the FLC

Clearinghouse which provides referral services to ORTAs in laboratories which
conduct R&D in an area of interest to an inquirer. There is no significant automated
information system of technology associated with this effort.

● FLC Training

The FLC is also instrumental in providing training to its members and in sponsoring
technology transfer demonstration projects. Training focuses on technology
transfer management from the perspective of the Laboratory ORTA. Courses are
usually conducted at quarterly and annual workshops and involve such subjects as
identifying marketable laboratory technology, outreach and marketing,
administration, financial management, intellectual property, CRADA establishment
and negotiation, and other subjects vital to the function of the ORTAs.

● FLC Publications

The FLC publishes a monthly newsletter - NEWSLink, and a 220 page document
on Federal laboratory technology, expertise, resources and information sources
called Tapping Federal Technology.

● FLC Awards Program

The FLC sponsors various awards to recognize outstanding technology transfer

managers and organizations for superior achievements in technology transfer. The
awards are presented at the annual FLC Symposium.

The National Technology Transfer Center

A major driving force in consolidating information and facilitating technology

transfer is the National Technology Transfer Center (NTTC). This organization was
established by the Congress in 1989 and funded by a grant through NASA. The
Center is based in Wheeling, West Virginia, operates a Washington, D.C. Office
and utilizes technology transfer agents throughout the United States. Because of
its comprehensive approach and association with most Federal Agencies and
Laboratories, it has become a primary organization in National Technology Transfer
Activities. This national organization has two key objectives:

● to help American industry gain easy, rapid and productive access to
marketable Federal technologies, the most relevant Federal laboratory
expertise, and unique Federal laboratory facilities; and

● to help the Federal laboratories find appropriate private partners to

develop and commercialize technologies.

The NTTC’s mission is to serve as a hub for the national technology transfer
network to expedite the movement of Federally developed technology into the
stream of commerce. To accomplish this mission, the NTTC has focused its
efforts in four areas: technology access (gateway), education and training,
economic development and technology transfer services.

● The NTTC Gateway

The NTTC technology access gateway activity is centered around an

evolving Computer Information System (CIS) which is an advanced indexing
system for Federal research in progress, laboratory expertise, laboratory
technology areas, and unique laboratory facilities. U.S. industry is able to
access the NTTC Federal Technology Gateway through an 800 number (1-
800-678-NTTC). A highly trained analyst staff works with the gateway user
to define the technology requirements (typically through a 10 to 20 minute
interview) and then utilizes the CIS to identify potential laboratory contacts
for follow-up action. R&D Center and Laboratory ORTAs are then
contacted to determine appropriate referrals. Once appropriate linkages are
made, the analyst provides the information to the client. On the average,
the NTTC spends at least 2 hours on the phone with each client, and several
more in researching the problem and following up. The NTTC has
established a tracking system to monitor the ensuing interactions between
the user and Federal laboratory contacts to assure that the technology
transfer process is reinforced by the NTTC. The tracking system provides
the NTTC with important data to measure its value added and to adjust its
services to meet the demands of both U.S. industry and the Federal

Some examples of technology transfer successes facilitated by the NTTC to

date include:

● a small company in Colorado who accessed technical information from

Harvard and Yale research, established a working relationship with a
Sandia Laboratory researcher, a business relationship with a

Philadelphia company, and has submitted proposals to both DOE and
the Air Force for new instrumentation products.

● A Kentucky company that makes safety switches for coal mines is

working with Oak Ridge National Laboratory to incorporate new
materials into a new product.

● A packaging firm in West Virginia that found and incorporated a new

sealing process from an Army laboratory in New Jersey.

● A Virginia company that was linked to commercial speech-recognition

technology and is working to apply it to closed-captioning technology
for the hearing-impaired.

The NTTC Federal Technology Gateway system is continuously evolving in

terms of capability, content and services. New Federal laboratory databases
and technology programs are being added as the program expands. A new
bulletin board concept known as “Business Gold” has recently been
activated. Business Gold is a spinoff of a technology transfer demonstration
between the former Strategic Defense Initiative, the Federal Laboratory
Consortium and the Navy. Its primary emphasis is aimed at assisting small
businesses. The Business Gold bulletin board is a modem accessible
database that provides current SBIR solicitations, Federal technology
available for licensing or further development via Cooperative Research and
Development Agreements (CRADAs) and listings of state and local sources
of business assistance.

It is estimated that the NTTC has obtained the majority (over 85%) of
available documented technology and resource information from the major
federal laboratories, research centers and agencies (see Appendix C). The
Center continuously seeks and adds new data as well as refreshes and
updates the data holdings in place.

The purpose of the gateway function is to link Federal laboratories and the
national technology transfer network with American companies,
trade/professional associations, investors, and economic development
organizations. Opened in October 1992, the gateway handled over 3000
referrals in its first six months of operation.

● Education and Training Programs

The goal of the education and training function is to provide familiarization

with and training in technology transfer to government, industry and higher
education. To accomplish this goal, the NTTC has established a series of
initiatives to facilitate the development and delivery of high-quality education
and training programs; information and awareness materials; and model
programs, standards and networks which enhance technology transfer and
innovation management. Specific initiatives include developing training
courses, curriculum, and needs assessments; and conducting seminars,
conferences, and forums; and providing facilitator/catalysts/instructors to
round out complete training and education packages.

The NTTC education and training activities will help government and
industry better understand innovation management and technology transfer
and to enhance personal and organizational approaches to these two
important concepts,

● Economic Development Programs

The NTTC economic development program goals are to facilitate linkages

between Federal agencies/laboratories and U.S. industry in fostering
effective technology transfer management; and assist in regional/state/Iocal
technology transfer activities.

In this area, the NTTC has established several initiatives to begin building
bridges to and between public and private organizations.

The Fund for Strategic Partnering is a program aimed at accelerating the

formation of partnerships between Federal laboratories, industry and
state/local economic development organizations. The NTTC developed the
concept, obtained NASA approval and funding, and issued a solicitation that
announced the project and requested proposals from appropriate teams,
Over 100 proposals were submitted and in June 1993, the NTTC announced
four winners who will share nearly $600K of NTTC funding. The ultimate
value of their partnerships exceeds $1 M because of matching commitments
by the winning teams, The NTTC will attempt to expand this activity in the
future because the quality of the proposals was, in general, outstanding, and
the lessons learned in forming cooperative partnerships will have far reaching
influence on regional technology transfer initiatives.

Additionally, the NTTC is undertaklng a technology transfer metrics initiative
to identify and quantify measures of effectiveness and best technology
transfer practices. The Center is working closely with the Interagency
Committee on Federal Technology Transfer chaired by the Department of
Commerce Technology Administration to support the committee’s Working
Group on Measurement and Evaluation. It is anticipated that this working
group will develop, with NTTC assistance, a system to measure the impact
of Federal technology transfer programs on U.S. industry and the economy.

The NTTC economic development focus will improve U.S. technology

transfer by recognizing and disseminating best practices; initiating strategic
partnerships; addressing regional, state and local technology issues: and
stimulating innovation in the technology transfer process.

● NTTC Technology Transfer Services

The NTTC has the capability to provide a broad range of technology transfer
services to Federal and industry clients. These services include technology
assessment, market analysis, commercialization reviews, marketing and
outreach plans, intellectual property support business planning assessment
and other relevant activities to transition technology from research through
productization to the market,


It is important in understanding the technology transfer programs of the agencies

to review not only their data collection and dissemination activities and information
systems, but also the other programmatic details that foster access to this data
and the overall mission of technology transfer. Following is a description of the
programs for technology transfer and commercialization in the primary Federal

The Department of Commerce (DOC)

As the keystone agency for technology transfer in government, the DOC has
several programs that support the management, documentation, access, and
dissemination of technology.

● The DOC Technology Administration

One of the primary responsibilities of the Technology Administration of the

Department of Commerce is chairing the Interagency Committee on Technology
Transfer. This committee, comprised of representatives of most of the Federal
Agencies conducting R&D, is working on three major projects%

● Development of metrics (measures of effectiveness) of technology

transfer. These will evolve to a set of parameters and methods to
document them that can be used by various agencies to measure their
SUCCeSS in technology transfer and take actions to improve their
processes. The NTTC is the facilitator for the development of these

● Harmonization of CRADA provisions that can make it simpler and

easier for industry to deal with more than one agency in developing

● Development of Conflict of Interest Guidelines that agencies can refer

to in developing policy regarding technology transfer programs.

● The Clearinghouse for State and Local Initiatives on Productivity,

Technology, and Innovation

The “Commerce Clearinghouse" serves as a central repository for information on

initiatives by state and local governments to enhance the competitiveness of
American business through the stimulation of productivity, technology and
innovation, The information provides vital information on contacts for technology
transfer driven by thrusts for ● conomlc development. An electronic version is
accessible through the NTTC.

● The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)

NIST has recently become one of the primary facilitators of commercial technology
development and transfer. The major mission of NIST is to help U.S. Industry
improve the quality and competitiveness of its products. The NIST Advanced
Technology Program is a primary element in the development of precompetitive
technologies critical to America’s economic growth. Its technology services enable
American industry to access the latest in information on measurements and
standards, and its many laboratories are advancing the state of the art in numerous

areas valuable to American industry, offering cooperative R&D opportunities in
such technical fields as Electronics, Physics, Chemical Science, Materials,
Computer Systems, and other areas .

The Manufacturing Extension Program (MEP) contains two component

programs that are vital to the technology transfer efforts of the Federal

● The Manufacturing Technology Centers (MTC) Program - this small

program has established seven MTCs nationwide to help small and
medium sized manufacturers to increase quality and productivity.
Programs are tailored to the needs of local industry, but each MTC
emphasizes technology transfer, helping manufacturers make effective
use of the advanced technology most appropriate for their operations.
They also focus on the concepts and practices of total quality

● The State Technology Extension Program (STEP) - this program works

with state and local technology outreach programs to improve the
competitiveness of small and medium-sized businesses through the
application of science and technology. Assistance includes:
stimulating cooperation and communication between and within
states, collecting and distributing information about successful
technology assistance activities, and providing matching grants for
development and coordination of technology assistance activities.

NIST has established a Memorandum of Understanding with the NTTC to place a

liaison person at NIST to facilitate technology transfer program cooperation and
effectiveness between the two organizations and with the MTC’s.

* Patent and Trademark Office

because of the need to protect intellectual property in the technology transfer,

patents are an essential part of the process, The Patent and Trademark Office
maintains the files of patented technology dating back to the birth of the Nation.
heir automated search capability, provided on site, should be considered as an
essential element in the documentation of technology and thus the process of
Technology transfer, This system requires training and must be used under the
supervision of Patent Office personnel; it is not a modem-accessible system
available to the public or to intermediary technology transfer facilitators.

● The Patent Licensing Bulletin Board (PLBB)

An electronic bulletin board system, providing the earliest possible

information about the hundreds of new Government R&D inventions
available for licensing is maintained by NTIS. (See above)

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)

NASA has been a traditional leader in technology transfer since the passage of the
Space Act of 1958. As a part of its chartered mission, NASA makes technology
available on a wide-spread basis to American industry through many elements that
are part of its Technology Utilization Program. While not governed by the same
legislation regarding technology transfer as the federal labs, NASA endeavors to
cooperate fully with the FLC and other Federal agencies in fostering technology
transfer programs and events to promote commercialization of Federal
technology .

● NASA Field Center Offices

NASA has established Field Center Offices at each of its nine major centers
and laboratories. These offices coordinate and manage a full range of technology
transfer activities including the documentation of new technology developed at the
center (which is provided to the RECON system - see below), technical assistance,
cooperative project development, and outreach to industry,

● Regional Technology Transfer Centers (RITC’s)

In close cooperation with the Federal Laboratory Consortium (FLC), NASA has
reestablished its network of regional centers in line with the six regions of the FLC.
These six not-for-profit centers provide services, on a reimbursable basis, to U.S.
firms and industry within their designated regions The RITC’s help clients to
locate, access, and acquire technologies from throughout NASA and the Federal
technology base. RITC’s use their internal developed data bases and access many
of the others mentioned in this report to find technology, expertise, and resource
information. The NTTC is a primary source of information for the RITC’s.

● Specialized Technology Transfer Centers

In addition to the six regional centers, NASA supports several other technology
transfer activities:

● The Technology Applications Team - which works with NASA Field
Centers, industry, and national associations to develop cooperative
projects and relationships that address technological needs of a
national or industry-wide significance.

e The Computer Software Management and Information Center

(COSMIC) which collects and documents computer software
technology produced by NASA R&D programs and distributes it to
U.S. private, government, and academic organizations.

● The Earth Data Analysis Center (EDAC) which provides technology

transfer assistance and services in support of the distribution and
transfer of remote sensing/geographic information systems data to the
private sector.

● NASA Tech Briefs 15

One of NASA’s primary vehicles for technology transfer is its monthly publication
Tech Briefs, which has a free circulation to over 200,000 qualified government and
industry readers, The magazine features information on the full spectrum of NASA
developed technology with multi page descriptions of the technology and its
applications. Many of these technologies are somewhat limited in their application
(Aerospace Systems) but some have potential for spinoff to many other

● The NASA RECON Information System

NASA maintains an on-line information system cataloging NASA generated

technology at its Center for Aerospace Information (CASI) in Baltimore, MD.

NASA RECON is a controlled system due to its access to space critical technology.
Access by qualified organizations can be arranged through CASI, the principal
storehouse of NASA technology information. The Center maintains and distributes
NASA technical and program publications and provides general assistance in
response to inquiries from the NASA Tech Briefs readership and other U.S. public
and private sector organizations,

● NASA Technology Transfer Effectiveness

Early this year, NASA announced the results of an internal study of its technology
transfer efforts that reported that “there have not been many technology transfer
successes compared to the potential.., and past successes have largely been

anecdotal.” The study also reported that NASA has been too slow in transferring
knowledge to industry. Technical papers take as long as nine months to be
published, and listings in the NASA Tech Briefs are on the order of eighteen
months old. The report also speaks to “cultural” problems in that NASA
employees, managers, and contractors “do not feel technology is part of their job”
and that “many developers of NASA technology have had little or no direct interest
in non-aerospace applications. ”’” The General Accounting Office, as a result of its
review, stated that “NASA does not have an adequate system to comprehensively
monitor and measure the applications of the technologies it develops. Without this
information, the agency is not in a position to focus its resources on research and
development activities that can contribute most to preserving the international
competitiveness of the U.S. civil aeronautics industry, and cannot determine the
impact of its technology transfer activities on the industry’s competitiveness ”.
The report concluded that NASA should intensify its efforts to better identify
commercial applications and to find better ways of measuring the impact of its
transfer and commercialization.

The Department of Defense

Technology transfer in the DOD is hampered by concerns for mission priority,

security, and poor documentation; all are factors in the DOD culture.

Military R&D naturally carries with it a major concern for security. This concern is
pervasive with regard to technology, creating a perspective that everything
developed in the military R&D community is sensitive and not open to disclosure to
industry or the public. This unfortunate perspective causes many useful
technologies which are part of subsystems and components to be held closely
when they could have significant civilian commercial applications without
jeopardizing National security.

Department of Defense directives require that all R&D contracts be documented for
inclusion in the Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). The reporting system
calls for reporting of project definition information at the beginning of any R&D
project, for follow-up reports on progress, and for a final report. Unfortunately,
these reports are not always made, or if they are, they are very abstract. Federal
Acquisition Regulations also provide for “Reports of Inventions” to be made on all
federal contracts, Unfortunately, the documentation of these inventions is sparse
and the system is not well enforced. The reports are managed through the
contracts system and generally wind up in project files without being reported to
any central source unless specific arrangements are made. (eg. the NTTC has
taken the initiative to obtain electronic Navy patent information directly from the
central Navy office that reviews and catalogues the patents). The result is that a

OTA Contract No. K3-0941.0

considerable amount of DOD technology remains undocumented. Even with this

handicap, the DOD and its laboratories do document a considerable amount of R&D
and technology information that has widespread commercial applications.

● The DOD Office of Technology Transition

Management of technology transfer activities in the DOD has traditionally resided

in the office of the Director, Defense Research and Engineering (DDR&E) under the
auspices of the Under Secretary for Acquisition, The FY 93 Defense Authorization
Act directed the establishment of an Office of Technology Transition within the
Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) to be the advocate for technology
transfer . This office has been established in name only and has, to date, done
little in the area of policy or other activities directed in the Act.

● The Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)

The Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) focuses on Department of

Defense (DOD) contractors and potential contractors. DTIC supplies technical
reports of completed DOD R&D efforts as well as summaries of ongoing DOD R&D
projects .

● The DTIC Technical Document Collection

As the central DOD scientific and technical information service center, DTIC
receives Defense-related reports with classifications ranging from
unclassified to Secret and Restricted Data. DTIC’s responsibility includes the
processing, announcing, storing, and distributing of these reports. DTIC
forwards all unclassified/unlimited defense reports (some 60% of all its
accessions) to NTIS,

The DTIC technical document collection totals more than a million different
titles, covering all areas of science and technology. The main information
system for the DTIC collection is the Center’s Work Unit Information System
which contains the descriptions of ongoing, Defense-sponsored, R&D
efforts. The database elements include a narrative description of each effort,
its purpose, costs, and the organizations responsible (with names and
telephone numbers of key personnel),

● Defense RDT&E On-Line System (DROLS)

DTIC operates the Defense RDT&E On-Line System that is a network of

remote terminals connected to the central computer system at the facility in

Alexandria, Virginia. There are over 1,100 remote terminals tied into the
on-line system located at Government or contractor sites. Special terminals
in Los Angeles, Boston and at DTIC Headquarters provide access to
registered user organizations in those areas,

● Access to DTIC

Access to DTIC holdings and services is restricted to U.S. government

organizations, their contractors and their potential contractors. This
automatically restricts non-defense companies from easy access to
technology with commercial applications outside those that are military.

Organizations registered with DTIC have access to a variety of products and

services. Most of these services are provided free of charge, while very
nominal fees are charged for others. The Center provides free searches of
the DTIC databases, free referral services, and free work unit information
summaries. There is a service charge for paper copies of technical reports,

There are two separate programs through which industrial organizations

(from large corporations to small companies) and individual researchers may
establish eligibility to receive classified and unclassified data to assist in
current research projects. Contractors, subcontractors, and grantees with
current U.S. Government contracts or grants may obtain access by filing the
necessary registration forms. These forms are reviewed by their Government
sponsors prior to approval by DTIC. Potential defense contractors with
adequate research and development capabilities can also gain access to DOD
R&D planning, requirements, contacts in laboratories and other DOD R&D
activities, and other scientific and technical information on DTIC databases.
DTIC performs the central registration function for the DOD organizations
sponsoring the program, but each of the military departments and the
Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) executes its own policy
agreements with industrial participants. Registration for this program
qualifies participants for access to the scientific and technical data bank at

To enhance access to DTIC information, NTTC analysts have access to DTIC

resources in order to identify DOD expertise and resources as well as
information on unclassified R&D and technology.

● The Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (formerly Strategic Defense
Initiative) Technology Applications Program

Recognized by Congress as a premier technology transfer program, this dynamic

technology transfer activity was recognized in the FY 93 Defense Authorization
Act as the model program for the establishment of a DOD Technology Transition
Office. The program, established in 1986, conducts a full range of technology
transfer activities and pioneered several new approaches to technology transfer
which have produced significant results to date, including the establishment of 22
Spinoff Companies, generation of 97 new products on the market, filing of 97
patents, and establishment of 8 CRADAS .

● Technology Application Reviews

The Technology Applications Program conducts technology applications

reviews each focusing on a different technology area such as biomedical,
optics, materials, electronics or power. These meetings are usually held at
Federal R&D facilities, bringing together public and private experts to hear
the results of the R&D from the actual scientists and engineers involved, and
to work hand in hand with these specialists to develop application targets
and commercialization strategies. Subjects addressed include intellectual
property, business planning, project and company financing, strategic
partnering, market requirements, market analysis, competition, and
alternative strategies. After each review, the program follows through on
promising technologies and provides tailored support to foster spinoffs that
will benefit the nation’s economy. The reviews also provide access to
information on technology that is captured in the program’s data base, the
Technology Applications Information System.

● The Technology Applications Information System (TAIS)

The Technology Applications Information System contains over 2,000

abstracts of SDl/BMDO-funded technologies The program is continuously
updating and expanding these abstracts to include new developments in
BMDO research. A TAIS user can make an on-line request for more
information on any technology abstract and the program staff will link the
user to the researchers involved with the technology, whether the
technology has been developed in a Federal laboratory, university or
business. The program staff follows up with the user to assure that his/her
needs are met and to track successful linkages between the technology and
potential market applications. The TAIS is open to any American business

or Individual who registers with the Defense Logistics Agency in a process
that involves a simple form and about two weeks processing time. Over
20,000 companies and individuals are registered under this system. One of
the unique features of the TAIS is its ability to document users and follow
up on results. This capability has enabled the program to measure its
success over the past seven years.

● Proactive Outreach Program

The BMDO Technology Applications Program, supported by the NTTC,

produces several Technology transfer publications such as the BMD High
Technology Update, a quarterly newsletter provided to over 6,000 recipients
free-of-charge, and the BMD Technology Applications Report , an annual
summary that describes SDI/BMDO’S technology transfer program and
highlights representative spinoff successes. Additionally, the NTTC provides
focused articles on specific technology innovations or successful
commercialization activities by researcher for publication in a broad range
of media such as newspapers, magazines and technical/Wsiness journals.

The BMDO Technology Applications Program interfaces with professional

and trade associations; Federal, state and local government organizations;
universities; businesses: and other entities that share the organization’s goal
of improving America’s economic well-being by introducing new technology
into the marketplace.

The organization also promotes the commercialization of technology through

technology transfer demonstration projects, working with small high-tech
businesses, state organizations, and the Federal Laboratory Consortium,

● Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA)

ARPA has traditionally been recognized as a principal driver in generating

technology that has commercial benefits, yet ARPA has no structured
Technology Transfer Program per se. The ARPA approach maintains that
technology transfer to industry is an integral part of every R&D effort that it
sponsors and takes no additional effort to be proactive in commercialization
of technology outside of the direct program sponsorship it provides.

ARPA defense R&D is focused across the spectrum of defense needs, and
resident in four major programs dealing with simulation, software, materials
and manufacturing, and space technology.

● Technology Transfer in the Military Services

The Military Services principally focus on activities within their own

laboratories as the resource base for technology transfer. They do not
normally consider the R&D sponsored outside of the laboratories (eg in
corporations, universities, or via SBIR Programs) as a resource for
technology transfer. The management structure is resident at the level of the
Secretary of the Army and Air Force, and at the Office of Naval Technology
for the Navy. These functions are strictly policy oriented and not well
supported in terms of resources or personnel by any of the services.

A number of Defense Laboratories and R&D Centers have proactive

programs in technology transfer. They have Offices of Research and
Technology Applications (ORTAs), as mandated under legislation, which
attempt to create awareness and provide access to technology and expertise
resident in their individual laboratories. For the most part, these offices tend
to be understaffed and must operate with budgets insufficient to the task of
identifying and marketing the technology developed by their organizations.
The ORTAs coordinate closely with the Federal Laboratory Consortium, and
the National Technology Transfer Center. Both of organizations facilitate
access by business and industry through the ORTAs.

● The Corps of Engineers Construction Productivity Advancement Research

(CPAR) Program

CPAR is a program of cost-shared research, development and

commercialization/technology transfer (R&D) projects between the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. construction industry . The purpose
of the program is to assist the U.S. construction industry in enhancing its
productivity and domestic and international competitive position through the
development and commercialization of advanced technologies, materials and
construction management systems. Information on CPAR-sponsored
technology is available through the NTTC.

The Department of Energy (DOE)

As one of the three principal R&D agencies, DOE has a diverse spectrum of
programs that facilitate technology transfer. The agency is home to nearly 60,000
scientists, engineers, and technicians who perform about $6.6 billion worth of
R&D each year. The agency has R&G responsibilities that include developing
technology that produces or conserves energy, developing environmental
restoration and waste minimization technology, and developing and protecting

nuclear energy technology for both civilian and defense applications. These R&D
missions represent a challenge for technology transfer when the technologies are
associated with nuclear programs and an embedded technology transfer
responsibility for energy efficiency and environmental technologies .

● The Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

The principal repository for R&D and technology information for the DOE is placed
with The Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) located in Oak
Ridge, TN. This organization catalogues and provides access to DOE-generated
technology through its own controlled systems. OSTI maintains and periodically
publishes a list of DOE-funded technologies entitled DOE New Technology.
OSTI also catalogues computer software through Its Energy Science and
Technology Software Center.OSTI’s method for providing public access is by
providing information and announcements to NTIS and the Government Printing

OSTI Data Bases include:

● Energy Science and Technology - Bibliographic records of worldwide

information related to energy and nuclear science and technology,
This database is also available on DIALOG.

● Energy Science and Technology Software - Bibliographic records that

describe scientific and technical software. This database is also
available on DIALOG.

● New Technology from DOE - Brief descriptions of DOE research

results that have potential for commercialization efforts.

● Research in Progress - Descriptions of current or recently completed

research projects conducted or funded by DOE. This information is
provided to NTIS and is made part of the FEDRIP information system.

Information on DOE R&D programs, technology, expertise and resources are made
available to the NTTC under a Memorandum of Agreement between NASA and
DOE established in July 1992.

● DOE Technology Transfer Programs

DOE employs a full range of mechanisms to transfer technology. These methods

are explained in detail In the section of this report titled “Mechanisms for
Technology Transfer”, and include:

● Cooperative Agreements
● Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADAs)
● R&D Consortia
● Exchange Programs
● Patent Licensing Agreements
● User Facility Agreements
● Work-for-Others

● Special DOE Technology Transfer Programs

In addition to its SBIR program, the DOE sponsors two unique programs that
provide for the development of inventions and innovations by individual inventors
that foster energy efficiency and conservation, supporting DOE’s R&D efforts as
well as contributing to DOE’s technology transfer efforts outside the Iaboratories.

● The Energy-Related Inventions Program 25

The Energy-Related Inventions Program (ERIP) is a joint program of the

Department of Energy (DOE) and the Department of Commerce (DOC). The
program provides for a free evaluation of energy-producing and energy
conservation-related concepts, devices, products, materials or processes.
The invention may be in any stage of the development process ranging from
novel concept to product ready for market. Evacuations are conducted by
the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). There is no fee or
obligation for obtaining an evacuation from NIST. If an invention is
recommended by NIST to DOE for funding and accepted, grants of up to just
under $ 100,000 may be provided for development of selected inventions.
Since 1975, some 30,000 inventions and ideas have been evaluated, 591
were recommended, and about 80% of these have been funded.

The Energy-Related Inventions Program also provides two training courses

throughout the country, with workshops for inventors that can assist them
with the commercialization and marketing of their new products and

● The Innovative Concepts Program26

The Innovative Concepts (lnnCon) program, sponsored by the Department of

Energy, provides seed-money grants to encourage energy innovation and
helps new technologies move quickly from the concept stage into the
marketplace. InnCon is a bridge between program managers in government
and industry and creative people and technologists with new ideas for
solving applied energy and environmental problems. InnCon normally
specifies the topic areas of interest. For the past two years, the specific
research topic area sponsored has been Waste Minimization/Utilization. The
seed funding is intended to further develop the concept to a stage at which
other prospective sponsors can more clearly assess the concept’s potential.
After completion of the grant, the funded technologies and federally-
supported technologies are showcased at a technology and business
opportunity fair, held specifically to expose potential sponsors to the new
concepts. For some of these technologies, the fair is their first public
introduction, The InnCon Program provides grants of up to $20,000 for up
to 15 inventions and technologies each year that meet the advertised
criteria. Projects are selected under a competitive process.

Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)

The principal R&D organization within HHS is the National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Most of the department’s technology transfer activities, including that of the Public
Health Service (PHS), the NIH, the Alcohol, Drug Abuse and Mental Health
Administration (ADAMHA), and the Center for Disease Control (CDC) are managed
through the NIH Office of Technology Transfer .

● PHS Office of Technology Transfer On-Line (PHS-OTTO)

The PHS-OTTO is an electronic bulletin board that contains a variety of essential

technology transfer data, This service contains downloadable copies of PHS
technology transfer guidelines and model agreements, a list of current CRADAs
and PHS Scientists interested in new CRADAs, as well as summaries of inventions
available for licensing, It is updated periodically during the year and is also made
available to the NTTC,

● Computer Retrieval of Information on Scientific Projects (CRISP)

CRISP is a major scientific information system containing data on the research

program sponsored by the Public Health Service. Most of this research falls within
the broad category of extramural projects: grants, contracts and cooperative

agreements. PHS and other Federal agencies can establish an account to access
CRISP. The information is also made available to the NTTC and DIALOG.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)

As one of the oldest institutions conducting technology transfer, the USDA

Agricultural Extension Service is known as the grandfather of all technology
transfer programs. USDA, through the Agricultural Research Service (ARS)
generates a significant number of inventions and technology that have wide-spread

● TEKTRAN - The USDA Technology Transfer Information System

USDA developed the TEKTRAN system to document agricultural technology and

make it accessible via modem to potential users. Over 12,000 summaries of the
latest research results on genetic engineering, safeguarding crops and animals from
diseases, biological control of pests, human nutrition, and other fields are available.
The service is provided at no cost .

● The Alternative Agricultural Research and Commercialization Center (AARC)

The purpose of the AARC is to facilitate and accelerate development and

commercialization of industrial (non-food, non-feed) products manufactured from
farm and forestry materials. Information on technology developed by the program
will be provided to the NTTC for dissemination .

● The Agricultural Inventions Catalog 30

USDA publishes a 150 page catalog containing abstracts of thousands of patented

inventions developed under USDA sponsorship. This catalog is available on-line
through the NTTC.

The Department of Education

The principal technology development activity within the DOEd is that conducted
by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR). This
organization manages a number of activities important to technology transfer .

● Rehabilitation Research and Training Centers (RRTCs) - each center focuses

on a particular aspect of behavioral, medical, or vocational rehabilitation.
Knowledge contributed by these centers has greatly influenced the fields of

rehabilitation medicine, psychological rehabilitation, integration, vocational
strategies, and architecture.

● Rehabilitation Engineering Centers (RECs) - these organizations seek

solutions to disability-related problems through technology. Areas of study
include sensory loss, mobility impairment, chronic pain, and communication

● The Rehabilitation Information System (RIS) - contains information on R&D

activities. It is made available via computer modem to rehabilitation
professionals, researchers, and people with disabilities to locate technology
and information.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

The EPA is principality a regulatory agency, thus much of its R&D activities are
oriented toward enforcement technologies. The agency does produce technology
with commercial applications, has a proactive technology transfer program and
maintains several data bases of interest :

● The Alternative Treatment Technology Information Center (ATTIC)

ATTIC is a comprehensive, automated information retrieval system that

integrates technical hazardous waste information into a centralized,
searchable resource. ATTIC provides data and technical information on
methods of hazardous waste treatment and is accessible to all members of
the Federal, State, and private sector involved in site remediation. The
service is provided free .

● The Pollution Prevention Information Clearinghouse (PPIC)

PPIC is a clearinghouse dedicated to reducing industrial pollutants through

technology transfer, education, and awareness. The system contains
technical, policy, programmatic, legislative, and financial information. The
service is provided free .

● The Vendor Information System for Innovative Treatment Technologies


VISITT is a compilation of technical information and products provided by

hundreds of pollution treatment vendors. The VISITT data base can also be
accessed through the NTTC.

The Department of Transportation (DOT)

The principal technology developers within DOT are the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).

The FAA manages its technology transfer program principally through the FAA
technical Center ORTA in Atlantic City, NJ. Principal R&D programs and points of
contact are contained in the FAA Plan for Research, Engineering and
Development which is provided to the NTTC for electronic access.

The FHWA operates an extensive technology transfer network with Local Technical
Assistance Program (LTAP) offices in each state. The FHWA promotes technology
transfer thorough demonstration projects, Applications Projects, Test and
Evaluation Projects, and Special projects for evaluation . Technical abstracts of
these R&D projects, locations of the centers, training and technology resources,
and the Nationally Coordinated Plan of Highway Research, Development, and
Technology are electronically accessible through the NTTC.

Other Federal Agencies

Other federal agencies that conduct Research and Development operate their
technology transfer programs principally through their laboratories and the FLC.
The individual laboratories are asked to provide electronic media information to the
National Technology Transfer Center which provides a gateway service for the
ORTAs at each laboratory.

The Critical Technologies Institute (CTI)

The Critical Technologies Institute is an organization of the White House Office of

Science and Technology Policy. It was created by Congress in 1991 as a Federally
Funded R&D Center (FFRDC) and is operated by the RAND Corporation. CTI
provides analytical support to the Executive Office of the President .

● The CTI Data Base System

CTI is conducting a top-down, fiscal-based survey of all Federal R&D Programs.

The information is derived from:

● The Federal Procurement Data System - managed by General Services

Administration (GSA), containing information on all contracts awarded
by the Federal Government.

● The Federal Assistance Awards Data System - managed by DOC
contains information on all grants and assistance programs to states,
institutions, etc.

● The Budget Preparation System - essentially the Federal Budget Data

Base - managed by the Office of Management and Budget.

● The Catalogue of Federal Program Assistance - managed by GSA

containing programmatic information on federal programs.

● The Consolidated Federal Funds Report - managed by the Census

Bureau of DOC.

CTI works closely with the NTTC and other agencies to share data and resources.
The CTI data base contains classified information and is used only for internal
management and studies. It is not open for access by the public.


A number of private sector programs provide technology transfer information

services for a fee. These programs operate in parallel and sometimes in
cooperation with other organizations to obtain and disseminate information.

Teltech T M

Teltech, based in Minneapolis, MN, is a commercial technical service that

provides access to both knowledgeable individuals as well as an information
retrieval service. The service advertises that it provides fast, accurate
answers to technical questions , The service operates through telephonic
contact with a network of Teltech experts selected form universities, national
laboratories, consulting groups, and industry retirees. Charges for these
services are approximately $165 per inquiry. Teltech provides technology
research services and literature searches through other information resources
such as the numerous ones listed above; an inquiry can be made on line with
the searcher, and the charges for this service run from $165 to $200 per
hour. It is suitable to a much more in-depth, hand-in-hand technology
transfer approach with a tailored response to business, market analysis and
technical questions.

● Knowledge ExpressTM

Knowledge Express is an on-line modem-access commercial information

service designed to find and evaluate R&D opportunities from U.S.
Government laboratories, universities, research institutions, and companies.
Its holdings include information from PHS, ARS/USDA, DOE, NITS, MIT, The
University of California, Columbia University, Cornell, and Harvard . The
service is available for an initial fee of $250 annually renewable at $100
with access fees of $2 per minute. Reports cost an additional $1.25 to
$9.25 depending on the information system searched,

● Technology Access Report”

Technology Access Report is principally a newsletter publication on

technology transfer; however, it maintains a Technology Access Hotline that
provides technology transfer services to subscribers, An annual subscription
is $447.

● Technical Insights, Inc.’*

Technical Insights, Inc. provides several technology transfer and

commercialization information services to business and industry. These
include Inside R&D, a weekly publication on current R&D with a special
section devoted to technology transfer; and monthly publications on
Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Industrial Bioprocessing, Genetic
Technology News, Futuretech Strategic Markets, Sensor Technology,
Advanced Coatings and Surface Technology, and High Tech Materials Alert.
Subscriptions to each of these publications average from $485 to $1,500
per year.

● Pennsylvania Business Information Center On Line

Sponsored by the Philadelphia-based Ben Franklin Technology Center of

Southwestern Pennsylvania, the Business Information Center has recently
opened an on-line data base aimed at small and medium-sized businesses
which is partially funded by Bell Atlantic corporation ,

● Texas Innovation Network

The Dallas-based Texas Innovation Network (TIN) claims to be the most

comprehensive state-funded technology information service in the U.S. The
system is available via Internet at a rate of 35 cents per minute”.

● Best North America’s

This service, provided by Cartermill, Inc. is targeted toward large

corporations. The service provides information on research at more than
300 academic research institutions in North America, Britain, and Western
Europe. An annual subscription costs $2,500 plus $300 per hour for on-line
searches. Unlimited searching is provided with an annual $10,000 fee.
Custom searches are also available.

● Technology Transfer Search System46

Illinois-based Technology Search, International, Inc. provides a publication

“Finding and Licensing New Products and Technology” and is introducing a
new Technology Transfer Search System Database.


Top 10 Universities in
Licensing Income Federally-sponsored research at universities
FY 89-90 has taken an downturn, but some of the major
1. Stanford . . . . . . . $24.8M universities have found a new source of revenue in
2. Wisconsin . . . . . . $21.9M
3. Michigan State . . $12.1 M the licensing of their technology, both university
4. Columbia . . . . . . $12.5M sponsored and federally-sponsored (Fig. 1) and
5. UC-San Francisco $11.3M significant numbers of patented technology are
6. MIT . . . . . . . . . . $ 5.2M 47,48
emerging as a result (Fig 2) , The potential for
7. Colorado . . . . . . $ 3.7M conflict of interest and the requirements to
8. U. Washington . . $ 3.0M document federal work are two complicating factors
9. Harvard . . . . . . . $ 2.5M
10.Minnesota . . . . . . $ 2 . 3 M in university technology transfer management
activities. Two programs will serve to illustrate the
types of activities at these institutions:
Figure 1

● The MIT Licensing Office

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has a prime interest in taking

equity in a business start-up, but closely regulates the propriety of such an equity
position, both from the viewpoint of the university and the researchers who
developed the technology. MIT has helped develop more than 30 spin-off
companies in the last five years. The university still has to distinguish carefully
which technologies have received Federal sponsorship (such as that emanating
from Lincoln Laboratory) as opposed to those that have been strictly University
sponsored. Federally sponsored research is required to be reported and is collected
by the NTIS. For these types of technologies, the Government has royalty-free
use, while the University can take steps to commercialize the technology. The
technology licensing office maintains information on all viable technology and its
patent status, and responds to inquiries from industry and potential investors.

● Johns Hopkins University Programs

At Johns Hopkins, the Federally sponsored technology at the Applied Physics

Laboratory (APL) is managed separately from other University research. The APL
Technology Transfer Office is currently working with the NIT-C to provide a
gateway to information on the technologies produced with Federal funding from

Top TECHNOLOGY Universities

Across the campus, another activity involves an
initiative oriented toward commercializing university Invention Disclosures
spinoffs. The Triad Investors Corporation is seeking FY 89-90
out and cataloging technology with commercial 1. MIT . .........609
applications that can be developed for less than 2. Stanford . . . . . . . 311
$200,000 in less than 18 months. One company 3. Minnesota . . . . , 309
that has recently spun-off from Hopkin’s research is 4. Wisconsin . . . . . . 225
5. Cornell . . . . . . . . 181
marketing a CPR vest which provides artificial 6. Harvard . . . . , . . 165
pulmonary resustication for heart attack patients. 7. Michigan . . . . . . 162
For those familiar with the technology 8. U. Washington . . 148
commercialization process, this objective is an 9. Johns Hopkins , . 141
ambitious one. The university is setting up Figure 2
collaborative agreements such as a recent
partnership to fund cancer research where the
participating company gets an options on new treatments or diagnosis technology.


Considering the diversity and complexity of the process, the resources, and the
challenges, technology transfer successes do occur. There are many aspects to be
addressed in the consideration of developing a more comprehensive, user-friendly
information system for technology transfer.

Technical Education and Skills - It is a major tenant of successful technology

transfer that the process must be conducted in a person-to-person mode.
Knowledge transfers through personal interaction, thus the creation of data bases
of technology information should be considered a viable tool for the process, but
there are many other aspects required for success. Principal among these is the
involvement of an individual with a technical background in the area of interest and
someone knowledgeable of the federal system and the means to search available
information systems.

Knowledgeable - The availability of information is not as universally known as it

should be. Continued outreach and marketing efforts are needed to make business
and industry knowledgeable of resources for technology transfer access.

User-Friendliness - Electronic access to information in the technology transfer

process is wide-spread and of varying utility. Many of the systems mentioned in
this report are difficult for the average person to use. Some do not have search
capabilities and require paging through lists of information to find something
potentially applicable. Effective systems offer a search capability that extends
across all data at a time and permits boolian1 search methods

Currency of information - Some systems are updated continuously, while others

are changed only on an annual basis, Updating of large systems is a labor-
intensive process. Consolidated systems must reply on the originating agencies to
keep information current and maintain constant liaison to ensure the most recent
information is available.

Need for Facilitators - The role of intermediaries (RITCs, MTCs, SBDCs, and
extension services) in the technology transfer process is vital in reaching small and
medium size businesses. These intermediaries can be most effective when they
have technical staff members who understand technology and applications as well

●boolian searching allows for the selection of several terms to search for at one time and other
options to limit the search to obtain the desired results.

as know how to search efficiently for information. Unfortunately, most SBDC’s do
not have this kind of staff, nor are many able to afford the expertise. Their
linkages with universities are mostly from the business aspect and not enough
from the technical aspect. These intermediaries need to be educated in
understanding the technology transfer and commercialization process as well as
trained in skills such as effective information search and retrieval.

Formats for cataloging technology for the purposes of technology transfer have
been developed by most of the agencies conducting R&D, While they are all
somewhat different, they cover the major elements of describing the technology in
abstract form, provision for keywords, and discussion of applications. For the
most part, these forms capture the essential elements of the technology.
Regarding the creation of a standardized form or format, this may assist in the
process if it could be developed in cooperation with all R&D agencies and
implemented across all Federal agencies. Formats and taxonomies for cataloging
technology have essentially become of questionable utility now that rapid search
software can access and identify information sought from millions of records in a
few seconds time. The appropriate organization to address this issue is the
Interagency Committee on Technology Transfer chaired by the DOC Technology

A comprehensive resource for use by intermediaries is also essential; however, the

creation of a master data base of all technology accessible by all people is a goal
which most likely cannot be achieved due to the basic facts involving security and
proprietary rights. These two considerations will always stand in the way of
complete public access to technical information.

Cost is a major consideration for small businesses who cannot afford the expensive
rates of commercial technology access services.

There will always be conflicts between services provided by the government and
those offered by the private sector. The difference between the two will most
likely be the amount of value added in terms of tailored, personal interactive
services for individual companies. These services will be the determining factor in
the willingness of business and industry to pay for services.

Taking a Holistic View

The objectives for improving the process of technology transfer on the part of the
Federal Government should take a holistic view of the problem, and not focus on
just the creation of a sophisticated access system.

Continued Congressional support of the existing grass roots infrastructure of small
business development centers, the Regional Technology Transfer Centers,
Manufacturing Technology Centers, and other technology extension activities is
essential to the picture.

To enhance the effectiveness of the intermediaries, Education and Training

courses in technology transfer and commercialization should be developed
specifically for the intermediary organizations and provided under the auspices of a
national organization with the appropriate expertise.

Also in taking a holistic approach, Government leadership should envision an

organization that is chartered and adequately funded to address the majority of the
issues of technology transfer by:

Assembling a resident staff of experienced technology transfer

Establishing a network of technology transfer specialists across the
Nation to assist in outreach and technology transfer activities.
Developing a proactive national outreach program.
Establish cooperative working agreements with Federal agencies,
laboratories, and universities conducting federal research to acquire
information and provide outreach and access services.
Creating a national information system on Federal R&D programs,
technology, resources, and sources of assistance.
Providing a gateway service with both direct computer access and
experienced technology analysts to assist in locating appropriate
technology, expertise, and/or resources in the Federal system,
Developing educational and training courses for technology transfer
professionals and intermediary organizations to help them address the
many-faceted challenges of technology transfer.
Sponsor and fund special cooperative programs to ferret out and
commercialize viable Federal technologies.
Investigate methods of measuring success in technology transfer
activities and developing recommendations for better tools and
Conduct special studies to assist in the formulation of legislation,
policy and programs dealing with technology transfer.

Current Assessment

Considering all of the organizations involved in technology transfer, the cross-

cutting organizations who have the most expertise and influence on the process

are the Federal Laboratory Consortium, the National Technology Transfer Center,
and the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Intermediary technology transfer facilitators (SBDCs, MTCs and State extension

activities can play a vital role in the technology transfer process, but they need
more training in the technology transfer and commercialization process and in
specific skills and techniques to be effective.

Considering all of the organizations and activities ongoing to facilitate technology

transfer of Federally-developed technology, the NTTC appears as the best
postured to lead in the development of programs methods and metrics and in
becoming the central fast-access point for new technology for American small and
medium sized businesses,


Considering all of the aspects of, challenges, and participants in technology

transfer, the most sensible opportunities for enhancing the current practice is to
continue and perhaps increase support to the NTTC, and to provide training a n d
other assistance to the other intermediary organizations (SBDCs, RTTCs, MTCs) as
facilitators to small and medium size business and industry.

The current Federal sponsorship of the NTTC expires in FY 95. Consideration

should be given to either additional funding, or to establishing the center as a
Federally Funded Research and Development Center with provisions for annual
federal funding support. Sponsorship of the Center might also be more
appropriately placed with the Department of Commerce rather than NASA.

Most legislation regarding Federal technology transfer is focused on transfer of

technology from the laboratories only 49 . Because only about half of the Federal
R&D expenditure is in the laboratories, consideration should be given to
emphasizing Federally-sponsored technology from other sources as well.

Any new innovations in facilitating federal technology transfer should be reviewed

by the Interagency Committee on Technology Transfer chaired by the DOC
Technology Administration and considered for implementation by the NTTC.

Appendix A

FEDWORLD - access to over 200 federal bulletin boards and information systems. Managed
by the National Technical Information Service (NTIS). To access, modem 703-321-8020.
Set modem to (N-8-1) (Parity NONE, Data Bits to 8, Stop Bits to 1), Emulation VT 100 or
ANSI. Accommodates up to 9600 baud.

BUSINESS GOLD - access to the National Technology Transfer Center information on new
technology, programs, and resources from ail Federal Research and Development agencies.
Modem 304-243-2561. Set modem to (E-7-1), emulation VT 100. Accommodates up to
9600 baud.

The Patent Licensing Bulletin Board (PLBB) - an electronic bulletin board system operated by
NTIS. The bulletin board provides the earliest possible information about the hundreds of
new Government R&D inventions available for licensing. Information on patents is provided
by seven federal agencies. It is available at no charge.
Modem 703-487-4061. (N-8-1 ), emulation VT 100.2400 Baud (The system is also
available on FEDWORLD)

FEDIX - FederalInformation Exchange - data on programs, points of contacts, publications,

and available lab equipment from the Federal Aviation Administration, Department Of
Energy, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Office of Naval Research, and NASA.
Modem 800-783-3349 (N-8-1 ), emulation VT 100.2400 Baud.

Small Business Administration On-Line - Modem 800-859-4636 (E-8-1 ) VT100, 2400


U.S. Department of Agriculture TEKTRAN - Access to over 12,000 research results in

agricultural research. For access registration and information, call 301-504-5345.

Pollution Prevention Information Clearinghouse - an information system dedicated to

reducing industrial pollution through technology transfer, education, and public awareness.
Sponsored by EPA or information call 202-475-7161.

Library of Congress - access to wide spectrum of information and programs. Modem 202-
702-4888 (N-8-1) VT1OO, 2400 baud.

SDI Technology Applications Information System - Technology from the Strategic Defense
Initiative (SDI) program (now known as the Ballistic Missile Defense Program). over 2000
abstracts of leading edge technology available to any American citizen or company.
Contact 703-693-1563 for details on access requirements. Modem 703-693-3007

Defense RDT&E On-Line System (DROLS) - a network of remote terminals connected to the
central computer system at the DTIC facility in Alexandria, Virginia. There are over 1,100
remote terminals tied into the on-line system located at Government or contractor sites.

Special terminals in Los Angeles, California; Boston, Massachusetts; and at DTIC
Headquarters provide access to registered user organizations in those areas. Access
through certification by DTIC.

● The Clearinghouse for State and Local Initiatives on Productivity, Technology, and
Innovation The “Commerce Clearinghouse= serves as a central repository for information on
initiatives by state and local governments to enhance the competitiveness of American
business through the stimulation of productivity, technology and innovation. The
clearinghouse is maintained and updated by the Technology Administration. An electronic
version is accessible through the NTTC. (See Business Gold above).

● Federal Research In Process (FEDRIP) - A data base of Federal Research In Process

maintained by NTIS. This information is made available to the NTTC and several
commercial computer modem data access networks including DIALOG and Knowledge
Express. Use of this system is suitable to a knowledgeable database researcher, but the
cost is prohibitive for an untrained small business to use.

● The NASA RECON Information System - an on-line information system cataloging NASA
generated technology at its Center for Aerospace Information (CASI) in Baltimore, MD.
NASA RECON is a controlled access system due to its access to space critical technology.
Access by qualified organizations can be arranged through CASI, the principal storehouse of
NASA technology information.

● PHS Office of Technology Transfer On-Line (PHS-OTTO) - an electronic bulletin board that
contains a variety of essential technology transfer data. This service contains downloadable
copies of PHS technology transfer guidelines and model agreements, a list of current
CRADAs and PHS Scientists interested in new CRADAs, as well as summaries of inventions
available for licensing. It is updated periodically during the year and is also made available
to the NTTC.

● Computer Retrieval of Information on Scientific Projects (CRISP) - a major scientific

information system containing data on the research program sponsored by the Public Health
Service. Most of this research falls within the broad category of extramural projects:
grants, contracts and cooperative agreements. PHS and other Federal agencies can
establish an account to access CRISP. The information is also made available through
DIALOG and through the NTTC.

● TEKTRAN - The USDA Technology Transfer Information System - a database of agricultural

technology accessible via modem to potential users. Over 12,000 summaries of the latest
research results on genetic engineering, safeguarding crops and animals from diseases,
biological control of pests, human nutrition, and other fields are available. The service is
provided at no cost. Information on TEKTRAN available from USDA Agricultural Research
Center (301 ) 504-5345

● The Alternative Treatment Technology Information Center (ATTIC) - a comprehensive,

automated information retrieval system that integrates hazardous waste data into a
centralized, searchable resource. ATTIC provides data and technical information on
methods of hazardous waste treatment and is accessible to all members of the Federal,

State, and private sector involved in site remediation. The service is provided free. For
information call (301 ) 816-9153. Access to ATTIC is also available.

The Pollution Prevention Information Clearinghouse (PPIC) - a clearinghouse dedicated to

reducing industrial pollutants through technology transfer, education, and awareness. The
system contains technical, policy, programmatic, legislative, and financial information. The
service is provided free. Access to PPIC is also available through the NTTC (see Business

The Vendor Information System for Innovative Treatment Technologies (VlSlTT) - a

compilation of technical information and products provided by hundreds of pollution
treatment vendors. The VISlTT data base can also be accessed through the NTTC. Access
to VISITT is also available through the NTTC (see Business Gold).

Appendix B




Department of Agriculture
● SBIR Program Abstracts and Topics**
● USDA Inventions Catalog*
● Tektran Data Base of USDA R&D*
● USDA Patent Information*
● Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance

Beltsville Agricultural Research Center

● ARS Technology

Eastern Regional Research Center

● “Organization and Functions of the Eastern Regional Research Center”
● “History of the Eastern Regional Research Center-
● “Laundry List of Projects from Eastern Regional Research Center”

Department of Commerce
● DOC Commerce State & Local Initiative Clearinghouse
● SBIR Abstracts & Topics ”
● “Institute of Telecommunications Sciences of the National
Telecommunications and Information Administration 1991 Technical
Progress Report for the Period October 1, 1990 through September 30, 1991”
● DOC SBIR Solicitations 1993

● NIST Inventions Catalog
● NIST Inventions Catalog March 31, 1993
● NIST Research, Services, & Facilities
● NIST Advanced Technology Program Abstracts
● NIST Manufacturing Technology Centers Directory ?
● NIST Advanced Technology Program Descriptions with POC’s 1990-1992
● NIST Advanced Technology Program 1991 Awards
● “Building and Fire Research Project Summaries 1992”
● “About BFRL”
● “BFRL Facilities”
● “BFRL Guest Researchers"

● “Federal Laboratory Information”
● NTIS information Resources

Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory

● “Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, Summary Report for FY 92°

Department of Defense
● SBIR Program Abstracts O”
● DOD Information Analysis Center Directory

1991 Annual Report: Meeting Its Mission to the Navy and the Nation”
● “NCEMT: National Center for Excellence in Metalworking Technology
1992 Annual Report: Growth Through Achievement”
● Metalworking Technology Bulletins
● Metalworking Technology Technical Updates
● “RaPid/Cast takes the guesswork out of casting design”

National Defense Center for Environmental Excellence

● NDCEE Capabilities Summary, Summer 1993

Patent Data*
NRL Review 1991
Naval Surface Warfare Center Crane Division Handout
Naval Surface Warfare Center Brief 1991
Naval Surface Warfare Center (Dahlgren) Catalog of Available
Naval Surface Warfare Center “Technology Resources: Facilities,
Services, Expertise”
Technology Transfer Summary Report FY 91 Naval Surface Warfare Center
Material Science & Engineering Research
Navy Patents 1992, 1993
NRL Individual Reports
NRL 1992 Annual Report
NRL Contacts
Various Project Outlines
Patents Available for Licensing
Naval Underwater System/ Office of Research and Technology
Navy Patents 1980-90
Naval Air Warfare Center, Weapons Division, China Lake Technology
Naval Air Warfare Center, Weapons Division, Point Mugu
“Visibly Transparent, Electrically Conducting Polymers”
“David Taylor Research Center”
“Deep Ocean Pressure Simulation Facility”
“Propulsion and Auxiliary Systems Department”
“Ship Materials Engineering Department”
“Ship Systems integration Department”
“Submarine Fluid Dynamics Facility"
“The Large Cavitation Channel (LCC)”
“United States Navy Surface Effect Ship SES-200 (IX-51 5)”
“Technical Departments”
“Centerline”, May-June 1991, March-April 1992
Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division Patents
“NAS Patuxent River”
“The Best in Aviation Technology”
“Compendium of DTRC Articles Published in Navy Domestic Technology
Transfer Fact Sheet, Dec 1975 through Dec 1989”
“Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren Division Technology Listing 1992:
Government Laboratory / Industry Technology Transfer Conference”

Degradable Plastics and Coatings Derived from Food Wastes (September, 1992)
Hydrogen and Sulfur Production from Hydrogen Sulfide Wastes
(September 1992)
● Plastics Recovery from Automotive Shredder Residue (September 1992)
● Recovery of Metals and Fluxes from Secondary Aluminum Salt Cake
(September 1992)
Selective Removal of Lead from Copper Based Alloys (September 1992)
ANL Contacts
ANL Meeting the Manufacturing Challenge
Argonne National Laboratory Research Highlights 1992-93
“Computational Science and Engineering at Argonne National
● “7-GeV Advanced Photon Source”
● ANL Technologies Available for Licensing
● ANL Technology Information Summaries
● “Environmental Assessment and Information Sciences Division”

Brookhaven National Laboratory

● Brookhaven Highlights: 1991
● Applied Programs at Brookhaven National Laboratory 1989, 1991
● Brookhaven National Laboratory Biotechnology
● Brookhaven National Laboratory Information
● Licensing Opportunities from Associated Universities, Inc. : Technologies Developed
at Brookhaven National Laboratory

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory

● Cooperative Program Opportunities from Universities Research
Association, Inc.
● “Focus on Fermilab”

Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory

● Advanced Light Source
● Bioscience: Catalog of Research Abstracts
● Building Technologies Program 1991 Annual Report
● CAM Research Projects
● Energy Analysis Program 1991 Annual Report
● Examples of Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory’s Capabilities in Environmental R&D
● Energy Conversion and Storage Program 1991 Annual Report
● Environmental Research Program 1991 Annual Report
● Inventions from Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory
● LBL Research Review 1991
● LBL Catalog of Research Projects
● LBL Contacts
● LBL Licensing Opportunities
● LBL Materials Science Division
● New Technology Announcements
● Technology Transfer at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory: Advanced
● Technology Transfer at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory: Environment
● Technology Transfer at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory
● Technology Transfer at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory: Transportation

Mound Laboratory
● Capabilities at Mound

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

● “Conservation and Renewable Energy Technologies for Buildings”
● “Conservation and Renewable Energy Technologies for lndustry"
● “Conservation and Renewable Energy Technologies for Transportation”
● ‘Conservation and Renewable Energy Programs Technical and Financial
● “National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Institutional Plan FY 1992- FY 1997-
● “Just the Facts: Compressed and Liquefied Natural Gas”
● "Solar Soil Detoxification: Cooperation for a Cleaner Earth”
● “Just the Facts: Ethanol from Biomass”
● ‘Just the Facts: Liquefied Petroleum Gas"
● “Just the Facts: Methanol Fuels
● “Solar Energy Research Institute Highlight: Practical Applications of Solar Energy
Research: Solar Detoxification of Hazardous Waste”
● “Solar Energy Research Institute Highlight: Practical Applications of Solar Energy
Research: Solar Treatment of Contaminated Water”
● NREL Patents
● “NREL in Review June 1992-
● “NREL: A Tradition o Technology Transfer”
● “Photovoltaic Energy Program Overview Fiscal Year 1991”
● “Photovoltaics Program Plan FY 1991- FY 1995”
● ‘Solar Energy versus Hazardous Waste: The First Round Goes to Solar”
● ‘Shedding a New Light on Hazardous Waste”
● ‘Solar Thermal Electric and Biomass Power Program Overviews FY 19900
FY 1991•

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

● Environmentally Compliant Manufacturing
● ORNL ’90
● ORNL Cooperating with Industry
● ORNL Contacts
● ORNL Material Highlights
● ORNL User Facilities
● Technologies Available from Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.
● The High Temperature Materials Laboratory: A Research and User Facility at the Oak
Ridge National Laboratory

Pacific Northwest Laboratory

● Laundry List of Projects from Pacific Northwest Laboratory
● Available Technologies, August 1992
● A Breakthrough in Water Treatment, 1990
● Converting High-Moisture Feedstocks to Fuel, 1988
● Classification Waste Treatment, 1990
● Reclaiming Oil from Refinery Sludge, 1991
● Applied Physics Center, 1990
● Earth and Environmental Sciences Center, 1990
● Life Sciences Center, 1990
● Materials and Chemical Sciences Center, 1990
● Reactor Technology Center, 1990

● NIH Current Research Data (CRISP)* (via CO ROM)
● PHS Technology Transfer Directory 1992

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

● Cantors for Disease Control and Prevention Licensing Opportunities

National Cancer Institute

● National Cancer Institute News

National Center for Toxicological Research

● "Looking at N. C. T. R."
● “Technological Strengths of the National Center for Toxicologic
Research: Project Descriptions”

Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration Technical Center

● “Federal Aviation Administration Technical Center” (from FLC
Northeast Region Directory, January 1990)
● “Federal Aviation Administration Technical Center"
(USGPO 1991505-184)
● Fact Sheets
● “Advanced Automation System”
● ‘Advanced Automation System Laboratory”
● “Aircraft Icing”
● “Aircraft Seat Cushion Fire Blocking”
● ‘Aircraft Emergency Exit Lighting”
● “Aircraft Interior Fir. Safety”
● “Aircraft Command in Emergency Situations”
● “Airport Surveillance Radar (ASR-9) Design Verification -
● "Airport Surface Detection Equipment (ASDE-3)"
● "Airport Safety”
● "Airport Capacity Improvements”
● "ARSR-4 Long Range Radar (FARR Program)"
● ‘ARTS IIA Projects”
● ‘Automated En Route Air Traffic Control”
● “Automated Surface Observing System”
● ‘Aviation Security"
● ‘Cabin Water Spray Fire Protection"
● ‘Cargo Compartment Fire Protection”
● ‘Catastrophic Area Radio Equipment Subsystem"
● ‘Central Utilities Plant"
● ‘Child Care Program"
● "Data Multiplexing Network Phase Ill Equipment”
● ‘Data General Facility”
● "Data Link”
● ‘Data Link Processor Program”
● "DBfVTE"
● “Direct User Access Terminal Services”
● “En Route Software Enhancements"

Pittsburgh Research Center
● Pittsburgh Research Center Program of Research Fiscal Year 92

Department of Veterans Affairs

● Rehabilitation Research & Development Center (CA)

Environmental Protection Agency

● Small Business Pollution Prevention Program ”
● Vendor Information System for Innovative Treatment Technologies
● Federal Information on Contaminated Site Clean Up Technologies
● Directory of Federal Publications on Alternative and Innovative
● Technologies for Corrective Action and Site Remediation
● ‘Synopses of federal Demonstrations of Innovative Site Remediation
● SBIR Topics and Abstracts for FY 93
● EPA Opportunities Bulletin
● EPA “Design for the Environment Program” ●

Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory

● “Eighteenth Annual Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory Research
Symposium, Abstract Proceedings"
, “Nineteenth Annual RREL Hazardous Waste Research Symposium, Abstract

Federal Laboratory Consortium

● ‘Federal Laboratories”
● FLC Contacts

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

● SBIR Program Abstracts & Solicitations
● SBIR Program Topics *

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

● SBIR Program Abstracts and Topics
● SBIR Inventions Catalogue
● NASA SBIR Abstracts of 1991 Phase I Projects
● COSMIC Software Catalog, 1993
● NASA 1992 SBIR Program Solicitation
● NASA SBIR Product Catalog
● Technology 2001 Volumes 1 and 2
● NASA Recon
● NASA SBIR Program Solicitations 1993

George C. Marshall Space Flight Center

● Marshall SFC Scientific & Technical Reports, Articles, Papers &
● George C. Marshall Space Flight Center Contacts
● George C. Marshall Space Flight Center Research & Technology 1991
● George C. Marshall Space Flight Center NASA Patents
● Technology Utilization and Transfer at Marshall Space Flight Center,

Appendix C

A A R C o... Alternative Agricultural Research Commercialization Center
ADAMHA . Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration (HHS)
AFT 2 E . . . . . Association of Federal Technology Transfer Executives
ARPA . . . . Advanced Research Projects Agency (DOD)
ARS . . . . . Agricultural Research Service (USDA)
BMDO........ Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (DOD)
CASI Center for Aerospace Information (NASA)
CDC . : : : : Center for Disease Control (HHS)
CPAR . . . . Construction Productiviy Advancement Program (DOD)
CRADA . . . Cooperative Research and Development Agreement
CRDA . . . . Cooperative Research and Development Agreement
CTI. . .............. Critical Technologies Institute
DDR&E . . . Director, Defense Research and Engineering
DOD . . . Department of Defense
DOC. . . . Department of Commerce
DOE . . . . Department of Energy
DOEd . . . Department of Education
DOT . . . . Department of Transportation
DROLS . . . Defense Research On Line System
DTIC . Defense Technical Information Center (DOD)
EADC . : : : Earth Data Analysis Center (NASA)
ERIP . . . . Energy Related Inventions Program (DOE)
FAA , . . . Federal Aviation Administration (DOT)
FEDRIP . . , Federal Research In Progress
FFRDC . . , Federally Funded Research and Development Center
FHWA . . . . Federal Highway Administration (DOT)
FLC . . . . Federal Laboratory Consortium
FRA . . . , . Federal Railroad Administration
FTTA . . , , Federal Technology Transfer Act (of 1986)
FY . . , . . Fiscal Year
GAO . , , . General Accounting Office
HHS , . . . . Department of Health and Human Services
Inn Con . Innovative Concepts Program (DOE)
LTAP . : : . Local Technology Assistance Program (DOT-FHWA)
MEP . . . . . Manufacturing Extension Program (DOC-NIST)
MC , . . . . Manufacturing Technology Center
NASA . . . National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NIDRR . . . National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research (DO EC)
NH . . . . . . National Institutes of Health
. . . . . . . . . . Not Invented Here
NIST . National Institute for Standards and Technology (Formerly National Bureau of
NITS . . , National Technical Information Service (DOC)
NTTC . . . . National Technology Transfer Center
ORTH . . . . Office of Research and TechnoIogy Applications
OSD . . . . . Office of the Secretary of Defense
OSTI . . . . . Office of Scientific and Technical information (DOE)
PHS . . . . . Public Health Service
PPIC... .. Pollution Prevention Information Clearinghouse (EPA)
R&D . . . . Research and Development
RDT&E . . . Research, Development, Test and Evaluation
REC . . . . Rehabilitation Engineering Center (DOEd)
RIS . . . . . . Rehabilitation Information System (DOEd) . .
RRTC . . . Rehabilitation Research and Training Center (DOEd)
RTTC . . . Regional Technology Transfer Center (NASA)
SBA . Small Business Administration
SBDC ...... Small Business Development Center
SBIR Small Business Innovation Research
SDI ....... Strategic Defense Initiative
STTR . . . . Small Business Technology Transfer Research
TAIS . . . . Technology Applications Information System
USDA . . . . United States Department of Agriculture
VlSITT . . . Vendor information System on Innovative Treatment Technology

1. Technology Innovation, Chapter 63 United States Code Annotated, Title 15,

Commerce and Trade, sections 3701-3715, Prepared for the Federal Laboratory
Consortium, West Publishing Company, 1991.

2. National Technology Initiative Summary Proceedings, U.S. Government Printing

Office, October, 1992

3. Technology for America’s Economic Growth, A New Direction to Build Economic

Strength, Executive Office of the President, February 22, 1993.

4. Program Information Package for Defense Technology Conversion,

Reinvestment, and Transition Assistance, Advanced Research Projects Agency,
March 10, 1993.

5. From Invention to Innovation: Commercialization of New Technology by

Independent and Small Business Inventors, Mohawk Research Corporation,
Rockville, MD, May 15, 1989.

6. Public Law 98-94; Department of Defense Directive 5230.25, ‘Withholding of

Unclassified Technical Data from Public Disclosure”, November 4, 1984.

7. TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER: Implementation of CRADAs at NIST, Army, and

DOE, Testimony of Jim Wells, GAO, before the Subcommittee on Energy,
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives.
U.S. General Accounting Office Document GAO/-RCED-93-53, June 10, 1993.

8. Small Business Guide to Federal R&D Funding Opportunities, National Science

Foundation, October, 1991.

9. NTIS 1992 Catalog of Products and Services, Department of Commerce,

Document PR-827, 1992.

10. Media Announcement, National Technical Information Service, Department of

Commerce, Document No. TA/301, December 7, 1992.

11. Patent Licensing Bulletin Board User’s Manual, National Technical Information
Service, Department of Commerce, undated.

12. Interview, R. Mullins, Department of Commerce Technology Administration,

July 21, 1993.

13. Research, Services, and Facilities. National Institute of Standards and

Technology, Department of Commerce Publication NIST SP 817, August, 1991.

14. NASA Technology Transfer Network, National Aeronautics and Space

Administration Publication CU.28039, May 20, 1993.

15. NASA Tech Briefs, Published by Associated Business Publications Co., Ltd., 41
E.42nd St., New York, N.Y. 10017,

16. “NASA Admits Exaggerating Transfer”, Washington Technology, January 14,

1993 p.7.

17. NASA AERONAUTICS, Impact on Technology Transfer Activities is Uncertain,

U.S. General Accounting Office, GAO/NSIAD-93-137, March, 1993.

18. Congressional Record, June 30, 1992, S9282.

19. DTIC Services and Resources, Defense Technical Information Center, Defense
Logistics Agency, Department of Defense, undated.

20. Small Business Guide to Federal R&D Funding Opportunities, National Science
Foundation, October, 1991.

21. Appendix B, Statistics as of April 1, 1993, Report on BMDO Technology

Applications, Ballistic Missile Defense Organization, Department of Defense, July,

22. Strategic Defense Initiative Technology Applications Report, Office of

Technology Applications, Strategic Defense Initiative Organization, Department of
Defense, August, 1992

23. CPAR Guidelines for Participation, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, December,

24. Technology Transfer 92/93, Department of Energy Publication DOE/ST 0005P

DE93003623, January, 1993.

25. Energy-Related Inventions Program, Department of Energy Publication
DOE/CH10093-151 DE9201O589, August, 1992.

26. Innovative Concepts Program, Department of Energy Publication DOE/CH

10093-208 DE93000082, April, 1993.

27. 1992 PI-K Technology Transfer Directory, Office of Technology Transfer,

National Institutes of Health, NIH Publication Number 92-3450, October, 1992.

28. TEKTRAN, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,

April 1992.

29. AARC Center, pamphlet, AARC Center, 14th & Independence Ave. SW,
Washington, DC 20250, January, 1993.

30. Agricultural Inventions Catalog, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural

Research Service, December, 1991.

31. NIDRR Program Directory, FY 1991, U.S. Department of Education, October,

1 991•

32. Technology Transfer, Environmental Protection Agency Publication

EPA/600/M-90/01 5 September, 1990.

33. From the Attic, EPA Alternative Treatment Technology lnformation Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Fall/Winter 1990.

34. The Pollution Prevention Information Clearinghouse, Environmental Protection

Agency, June, 1989.

35. The Federal Aviation Administration Plan for Research, Engineering, and
Development, Department of Transportation, August, 1992.

36. Federal Highway Administration Technology Applications Program, Department

of Transportation, January, 1993.

37. Nationally Coordinated Plan of Highway Research, Development, and

Technology, FY 92; Department of Transportation Report No. FHWA-RD-92-094,
December, 1992.

38. The Critical Technologies Institute, RAND Corporation Publication CP-236,

February, 1993.

39. Guide to Teltech Services, TELTECH, 2850 Metro Drive, Minneapolis, MN
55425, undated.

40. Knowledge Express, Technology Transfer Business, Fall 1992, p.56.

41. Technology Access Report, Technology Transfer Business, Fall, 1992, p. 38.

42. Technical Insights, Inc., 32 N. Dean St., Englewood, NJ 07631

43. “On-Line Networks Proliferate”, Technology Transfer Business, Spring, 1993.

p. 3

44. "On-Line Networks Proliferate”, Technology Transfer Business, Spring, 1993. p.


45. Jenks, Andrew; Bringing University Research to the Corporate Doorstep,

Technology Transfer Business, Summer, 1993, p. 57.

46. Technology Search International, Technology Transfer Business, Summer,

1993, p 62.

47. Kleiner, Kunt;Tech Transfer Means New Rules for Academic Research, The Life
Sciences Report, VoI 1, Nol 5, July/August, 1993.

48. Scearce, Kimberly; Universities: Testing Their Wings on High-Flying Finance,

Technology Transfer Business, Fall. 1992, pp. 44-45.

49. Technology Transfer; Use of Federally Funded Research and Development,

Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, JuIy 15, 1992.