You are on page 1of 3

Kriging

Fitting a variogram model


Because the kriging algorithm requires a positive definite model of spatial variability, the
experimental variogram cannot be used directly. Instead, a model must be fitted to the data to
approximately describe the spatial continuity of the data. Certain models (i.e., mathematical
functions) that are
known to be positive
definite are used in the
modeling step.

The figure above shows


an experimental
variogram with a
variogram model fitted
to it. Each red square is
a lag of the experimental
variogram. The x-axis
represents the distance
between pairs of points,
and the y-axis represents
the calculated value of
the variogram, where a
greater value indicates
less correlation between
pairs of points. This
particular variogram
shows a spatial
relationship well suited
for geostatistical
analysis since pairs of points are more correlated the closer they are together and become less
correlated the greater the distance between points.

This graphic also illustrates three important parameters that control the fit of the variogram
model. The nugget is the y-intercept of the variogram. In practical terms, the nugget represents
the small-scale variability of the data. A portion of that short range variability can be the result of
measurement error. The range is the distance after which the variogram levels off. The physical
meaning of the range is that pairs of points that are this distance or greater apart are not spatially
correlated. The sill is the total variance contribution, or the maximum variability between pairs
of points.
VSP can display the number of pairs that went into calculating each variogram lag. There should
be at least 30 pairs for each variogram point, if there are fewer this could indicate that the
distance between lags should be increased, so that more pairs are included in each lag.

The model type, nugget, sill and range can all be modified to fit the variogram model. Primary
importance should be given to matching the slope for the first several reliable lags.

Nugget: Related to the amount of short range variability in the data. Choose a value for the
best fit with the first few empirical variogram points. A nugget that's large relative
to the sill is problematic and could indicate too much noise and not enough spatial
correlation.
Model type: See Deutsch & Journel for the details of these models. Spherical and exponential
are most widely used.
Range: The distance after which data are no longer correlated . About the distance where
the variogram levels off to the sill.
Sill: The sill is the total variance where the empirical variogram appears to level off, and
is the sum of the nugget plus the sills of each nested structure. Variogram points
above the sill indicate negative spatial correlation, while points below the sill
indicate positive correlation . Can use the variance of data as a reasonable default.
The variogram may not exhibit a sill if trends are present in the data. In that case,
geostatistical analysis should proceed with caution, and at the least, ordinary
kriging should be used for mapping.
Variogram By default a single variogram model is used, but up to three can be nested to more
number: accurately fit a model to the data. In cases where nested scales of spatial continuity
appear to be present, it is best to attempt to determine the scientific reason for the
multiple nested models (e.g., a short range might be related to the average
dimensions of point bars, with a longer range related to the dimensions of a flood
plain in which the point bars are distributed).

References:
Cameron, K, and P Hunter. 2002. Using Spatial Models and Kriging Techniques to Optimize
Long-Term Ground-Water Monitoring Networks: A Case Study. Environmetrics 13:629-59.

Deutsch, C.V. and A.G. Journel. 1998. GSLIB Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide,
2nd Edition, Applied Geostatistics Series, Oxford University Press, Inc. New York, NY.

Gilbert, RO. 1987. Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring. Van Nostrand
Reinhold, New York.

Isaaks, EH, and RM Srivastava. 1989. An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. Oxford


University Press, New York.

Webster, R, and MA Oliver. 1993. How Large a Sample Is Needed to Estimate the Regional
Variogram Adequately? . Geostatistics Troia '92 , ed. A Soares, Vol 1, pp. 155-66. Kluwer
Academic Publishers, Dordrech