You are on page 1of 1

May 15, 2019

To: Interested Parties

From: ALG Research
Re: Statewide Polling among the Alabama Electorate

Polling conducted by ALG Research for Planned Parent Southeast last year showed that
banning abortion without exceptions for rape and incest is overwhelmingly a minority position
among Alabama voters. Further, even among conservative-leaning subgroups like Republicans,
evangelicals, and those who attend church at least weekly, more voters back abortion access
with, at least, exceptions for rape and incest than support a policy of the type passed through
the Alabama legislature this week that bans abortion without such exceptions.

The same survey that showed 60% of Alabamians giving President Trump a “favorable rating”
and Kay Ivey leading Walt Maddox 59% to 36% in the gubernatorial race found that only 31% of
Alabama voters support banning abortion without exceptions for rape or incest. Conversely,
65% support legal access in cases of rape, incest, or the woman’s life is endangered.

“Which of the following comes closer to your view on abortion?”

 16% -- Abortion should be legal in all cases

 20% -- Abortion should be legal in most cases but with some restrictions
 29% -- Abortion should not be allowed except in limited cases, such as rape, incest, or
when the woman's life is endangered
 16% -- Abortion should not be allowed except when the woman's life is in danger
 15% -- Abortion should be illegal in all circumstances

In fact, a ban without rape/incest exceptions is even a minority among the most conservative-
minded subgroups of the state electorate.

Abortion Access Opinion by Voter Subgroup

65 62
56 58 59
41 39 40 36
40 31

Statewide Republicans Kay Ivey Voters Evangelicals Attend Church at
least Weekly
Abortion should be legal, at least, in cases of rape/incest
Abortion should be illegal even in cases of rape / incest

Anzalone Liszt Grove Research conducted N=601 live telephone interviews with likely 2018 voters in Alabama. Interviews were
conducted between April 27 – May 2, 2018. Respondents were selected at random, with interviews apportioned geographically
based on past voter turnout. Expected margin of sampling error is ±4.0% with a 95% confidence level.