0 views

Uploaded by IAEME Publication

Fuzziness is found in engineering, medicine, manufacturing and other areas in our daily life. Recently, Fuzziness is applied to find the solution of human decision, reasoning and learning.

- Fuzzy Based Control Using Labview for Miso Temperature Process
- Applications of neutrosophic cubic sets in multi-criteria decision making
- ase-knowlean advanced cdge architecture based on fuzzy objects
- Fuzzy Set Theory 2015.pptx
- A Geometric Interpretation of the Neutrosophic Set, A Generalization of the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set
- Report Chapter 3
- Extension of Crisp Functions on Neutrosophic Sets
- Sugeno FIS for River Estimation
- Yan2015 Done
- TS FL Tutorial
- T3_ANFISs40929-016-0006-3
- r05410201 - Neural Networks & Fuzzy Logic
- SIMILARITY MEASURE BETWEEN POSSIBILITY NEUTROSOPHIC SOFT SETS AND ITS APPLICATIONS
- Competencies evaluation based on single valued neutrosophic numbers and decision analysis schema
- NEUTROSOPHIC HYPERIDEALS OF Γ-SEMIHYPERRINGS
- 1347950983.pdf
- 05359180
- 1999-Num Methods for FIVPs
- Power System Stabilizer Using Fuzzy Logic
- Leaning of Anomaly Detection in Network Traffic using Fuzzy Approach

You are on page 1of 12

Volume 10, Issue 03, March 2019, pp. 1339-1350. Article ID: IJMET_10_03_135

Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/issues.asp?JType=IJMET&VType=10&IType=3

ISSN Print: 0976-6340 and ISSN Online: 0976-6359

TRANSLATION OF KM IDEALS ON K-

ALGEBRA

S. Kailasavalli

Assistant Professors, PSNA College of Engineering and Technology, Dindigul-624622,

Tamilnadu, India.

C.Yamini

Assistant Professors, PSNA College of Engineering and Technology, Dindigul-624622,

Tamilnadu, India.

M.Meenakshi

Assistant Professors, PSNA College of Engineering and Technology, Dindigul-624622,

Tamilnadu, India.

VE.Jayanthi

Professor and Head, Department of Bio medical Engineering, PSNA College of Engineering

and Technology, Dindigul-624622, Tamilnadu, India.

ABSTRACT

Fuzziness is found in engineering, medicine, manufacturing and other areas in our

daily life. Recently, Fuzziness is applied to find the solution of human decision,

reasoning and learning. The concept of intuitionistic fuzzification of subalgebra and

KM ideals of the K-algebra are considered for testing the satisfaction of the properties.

In addition to Intuitionistic fuzzy magnified translations to intuitionistic fuzzy KM ideals

in K-algebra also introduced and their several related properties are tested and proofs

are presented in this work.

Keywords: K-algebra, fuzzy KM ideals, intuitionistic fuzzy KM ideal, intuitionistic

fuzzy magnified translation of KM ideals.

Cite this Article S. Kailasavalli, C.Yamini, M.Meenakshi and VE.Jayanthi, an

Intuitionistic Fuzzy Magnified Translation of Km Ideals on K-Algebra, International

Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 10(3), 2019, pp. 1339-1350.

http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/issues.asp?JType=IJMET&VType=10&IType=3

S. Kailasavalli, C.Yamini, M.Meenakshi and VE.Jayanthi

1. INTRODUCTION

The fuzzy set theory domain is a wide range and its information is incomplete or inaccurate

such as bioinformatics. Initially, the notion of the fuzzy sets and its functions are introduced by

Zadeh[1]. Extension properties of BCK-Algebras are described and it is implicative

[2].Intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS) is a powerful tool to deal with imprecision. Assigning each

element as a membership degree in IFS is the extension of Zadeh’s fuzzy set and it is

successfully applied and tested by Atanassov[3]. IFS are applied in various fields in artificial

intelligence system of intuitionistic fuzzy for expert systems; neural networks decision making,

machine leaming and semantic representations. The concepts of fuzzy magnified translation

on groups are introduced [4]. Intuitionistic fuzzy magnified translation notion and its various

properties are discussed [5],[6], [7] and [8].The K-Algebras and BCI Algebras are introduced

and the concepts are clearly discussed [9]. Fuzzy ideals of K Algebras are introduced and their

properties are verified [10] and [11] and the extension of Fuzzy KM an ideal on K-algebras is

also introduced and checked [12]. In this paper, Intuitionistic fuzzy and Intuitionistic fuzzy

magnified translations basic concepts are presented in section 2. Intuitionistic fuzzy is defined

in KM ideal and some theorems are verified in section 3 and its morphism properties proof are

in section 4. The following section 5 consists of Intuitionistic fuzzy magnified translations in

KM ideal are defined and their morphism properties are discussed in section 6.

2. PRELIMINARIES

Basic concepts of fuzzy K-algebra and its KM ideal are defined and discussed in this section

for obtaining the results of intuitionistic fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy magnified translations

under homomorphism and epimorphism properties.

Definition 2.1:

Let (G, ·, e) be a group with the identity e such that x2 ≠ e for some x(≠ e) ∈ G.

A K-algebra built on G (briefly, K-algebra) is a structure K = (G, ., ⨀, e) where “ ” is a

binary operation on G which is induced from the operation “·”, that satisfies the following:

(k1) (∀a, x, y ∈ G) ((a x) (a y) = (a (y-1 x-1))⨀a),

(k2) (∀a, x ∈ G) (a (a x) = (a x-1) a),

(k3) (∀a ∈ G) (a a = e),

(k4) (∀a ∈ G) (a e = a),

(k5) (∀a ∈ G) (e a = a-1).

If G is abelian, then conditions (k1) and (k2) are replaced by:

(k1’) (∀a, x, y ∈ G) ((a x) (a y) = y x),

(k2’) (∀a, x ∈ G) (a (a x) = x),

respectively. A nonempty subset H of a K-algebra K is called a subalgebra of K if it satisfies:

• (∀a, b ∈ H) (a b ∈ H).

Note that every subalgebra of a K-algebra K contains the identity e of the group (G, ·).

Definition 2.2:

A fuzzy set η in a k-algebra k is called a fuzzy ideal of k if it satisfies:

(i) (∀x∈ 𝐺)(η(e)≥ η(x))

(ii) (∀x, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐺) (η(y)≥min{η(y ⨀x), η((x⨀(x ⨀ y))})

An Intuitionistic Fuzzy Magnified Translation of Km Ideals on K-Algebra

Definition 2.3:

An intuitionistic fuzzy set A = {<x, η𝐴 (x), ϑ𝐴 (x)>: x∈ 𝑅} is called an intuitionistic fuzzy

subalgebra X if it satisfies

i. η𝐴 (x*y)≥ min{η𝐴 (x),η𝐴 (y)} and

ii. ϑ𝐴 (x*y) ≤ max{ϑ𝐴 (x),ϑ𝐴 (y)} for all x,y∈ X.

Definition 2.4:

An intuitionistic fuzzy set A = {<x, η𝐴 (x), ϑ𝐴 (x)>/x∈ 𝑋} in X is called an intuitionistic fuzzy

ideal of X if it satisfies

I. η𝐴 (0) ≥ η𝐴 (x), ϑ𝐴 (0) ≤ ϑ𝐴 (x)

II. η𝐴 (x) ≥ min{η𝐴 (x*y), η𝐴 (y)}

III. ϑ𝐴 (x) ≤ max{ϑ𝐴 (x*y),ϑ𝐴 (y)} for all x,y∈ X.

Intuitionistic Fuzzy is the Extensions of fuzzy is defined and its subdivion of KM ideals are

described below.

Definition 3.1:

Let (X,⊙,0) be a K-algebra, if the following conditions are satisfied, for all x,y,z𝜖X

I. η(0) ≥ η(x).

II. 𝜇(𝑦 ⊙ 𝑧) ≥min{ 𝜇(𝑥 ⊙ 𝑦), 𝜇(𝑧 ⊙ 𝑥) }

III. then, a fuzzy subset ηin x is called a fuzzy KM-Ideal of X

Definition 3.2:

An intuitionistic fuzzy set A = {<x, η𝐴 (x), ϑ𝐴 (x)>/x∈ 𝑋} in K-algebra X is called an

intuitionistic fuzzy KM-ideal of A if

I. η𝐴 (0) ≥ η𝐴 (x) and ϑ𝐴 (0) ≥ ϑ𝐴 (x)

II. η𝐴 (y⨀ z) ≥ min{η𝐴 (x⨀ y), η𝐴 (z⨀ x)}

III. ϑ𝐴 (y⨀ z) ≤ max {ϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y), ϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x)}

Theorem 3.3:

Let A be a nonempty subset and intuitionistic fuzzy KM ideals of a k-algebra. Then so is A =

η𝐴 and A = (x, ϑ𝐴 , ̅̅̅

(x, η𝐴 , ̅̅̅) 𝜗𝐴 )

Proof:

We know that,η𝐴 (0) ≥ η𝐴 (x). This implies that 1- ̅̅̅

η𝐴 (0) ≥ 1- ̅̅̅

η𝐴 (x)

η𝐴 (0) ≤ ̅̅̅

̅̅̅ η𝐴 (x) for every a∈ 𝐴.

Let us consider ∀ a, b, c ∈ 𝑋. Then

η𝐴 (y⨀ z) ≥ min{η𝐴 (x⨀ y), η𝐴 (z⨀ x)}

η𝐴 (y⨀ z) ≥ min {1- ̅̅̅

⟹ 1- ̅̅̅ η𝐴 (x⨀ y), 1- ̅̅̅

η𝐴 (z⨀ x)}

⟹η

̅̅̅

𝐴

(y⨀ z) ≤ 1- {η

̅̅̅

𝐴

η𝐴 (z⨀ x)}

(x⨀ y), ̅̅̅

⟹η

̅̅̅

𝐴

(y⨀ z) ≤ max {η

̅̅̅

𝐴

η𝐴 (z⨀ x)}

(x⨀ y), ̅̅̅

Hence A = (x, η𝐴 , ̅̅̅)

η𝐴 is an intuitionistic fuzzy KM ideal of X.

S. Kailasavalli, C.Yamini, M.Meenakshi and VE.Jayanthi

Let A be an intuitionistic fuzzy KM ideal of a K-algebra X.

Nowϑ𝐴 (0) ≤ ϑ𝐴 (x)

⟹ 1- ̅̅̅

ϑ𝐴 (0) ≤ 1- ̅̅̅

ϑ𝐴 (x)

⟹ϑ̅̅̅ ̅̅̅

𝐴 (0) ≥ ϑ𝐴 (x) ∀x∈ X.

Now consider ∀ a, b, c ∈ A. Then we have

ϑ𝐴 (y⨀ z) ≤ max {ϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y), ϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x)}

⟹ 1- ̅̅̅

ϑ𝐴 (y⨀ z) ≤ max { 1- ̅̅̅ ϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y), 1- ̅̅̅

ϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x)}

⟹ϑ̅̅̅ ̅̅̅ ̅̅̅

𝐴 (y⨀ z) ≥ 1- max { ϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y), ϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x)}

⟹ϑ̅̅̅ ̅̅̅ ̅̅̅

𝐴 (y⨀ z) ≥ min {ϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y), ϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x)}

Hence A = (x, ϑ𝐴 , ̅̅̅

ϑ𝐴 ) is an intuitionistic fuzzy KM ideal of X.

Definition 3.4

An ideal A of a KM ideal is said to be closed if 0*x ∈ X, ∀ x ∈ X.

Theorem3.5:

Let A be a nonempty set and an intuitionistic fuzzy closed KM-ideal of a K-algebra A. Then A

η𝐴 and A = (x, ϑ𝐴 , ̅̅̅

= (x, η𝐴 , ̅̅̅) ϑ𝐴 ) is also a closed intuitionisticfuzzy closed KM-ideal.

Proof:

First we prove A = (x, η𝐴 , ̅̅̅)

η𝐴 is a intuitionistic closed fuzzy KM-ideal .

For all x ∈ X we have

η𝐴 (0*x) ≤ η𝐴 (x)⟹ 1- ̅̅̅(0*x)

η𝐴 ≤ 1-η

̅̅̅(x)⟹η

𝐴

̅̅̅(0*x)

𝐴

η𝐴

≥ ̅̅̅(x)

Therefore A = (x, η𝐴 , ̅̅̅)

η𝐴 is a intuitionistic closed KM-ideal of A.

To prove the second part,

let x ∈ X, then we have

ϑ𝐴 (0*x) ≥ ϑ𝐴 (x) ⟹ 1- ̅̅̅ϑ𝐴 (0*x) ≥ 1- ̅̅̅

ϑ𝐴 (x) ⟹ϑ̅̅̅ ̅̅̅

𝐴 (0*x) ≤ ϑ𝐴 (x) ∀ a, b, c ∈A.

̅̅̅

Hence A = (x, ϑ𝐴 , ϑ𝐴 ) is an intuitionistic fuzzy closed KM-ideal of A.

Lemma 3.6:

Let A= (η𝐴 , ϑ𝐴 ) be an intuitionistic fuzzy KM ideal of X. If y ≤ x in X, then

η𝐴 (y) ≥ η𝐴 (x), ϑ𝐴 (y) ≤ ϑ𝐴 (x) that is η𝐴 is order-reserving and ϑ𝐴 is order-preserving.

PROOF

Let x, y ∈ X be such that y ≤ x. Then y⨀ x = 0 and so

η𝐴 (y) = η𝐴 (0⨀ y)

≥ min (η𝐴 (x⨀ 0), η𝐴 (y⨀ x))

≥ min (η𝐴 (x), η𝐴 (0)) = η𝐴 (x)

Hence η𝐴 (y) ≥ η𝐴 (x)

Similarly

ϑ𝐴 (y) = ϑ𝐴 (0⨀ y)

≤ max (ϑ𝐴 (x⨀ 0), ϑ𝐴 (y⨀ x))

An Intuitionistic Fuzzy Magnified Translation of Km Ideals on K-Algebra

Hence ϑ𝐴 (y) ≤ ϑ𝐴 (x)

Lemma 3.7:

Let an intuitionistic fuzzy set A= (η𝐴 , ϑ𝐴 ) in X be an intuitionistic fuzzy ideal of X. If the

inequality

(x⨀ y) ≤ z holds in X, then

η𝐴 (y⨀ z) ≥ min{η𝐴 (x⨀ y), η𝐴 (z⨀ x)}

ϑ𝐴 (y⨀ z) ≤ max {ϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y), ϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x)}

Proof:

Let x, y, z ∈ X be such that x⨀ y ≤ z.

Then (x⨀ y) ⨀ z = 0 and thus

η𝐴 (y⨀ z) ≥ min{η𝐴 (x⨀ y), η𝐴 (z⨀ x)}

≥ min {min { η𝐴 ((x⨀ y) ⨀ z), η𝐴 (z⨀ x)}, η𝐴 (x⨀ y)}

= min {min {η𝐴 (0), η𝐴 (z⨀ x), η𝐴 (x⨀ y)}

= min {η𝐴 (x⨀ y), η𝐴 (z⨀ x)}

ϑ𝐴 (y⨀ z) ≤ max {ϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y), ϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x)}

≤ max {max{ϑ𝐴 ((x⨀ y) ⨀ z), ϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x), ϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y)}

= max {max{ϑ𝐴 (0), ϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x)}, ϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y)}

= max {ϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x), ϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y)}

= max {ϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y), ϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x)}

Hence the proof.

Theorem 3.8:

An intuitionistic fuzzy set A= (η𝐴 , ϑ𝐴 ) is an intuitionistic fuzzy KM ideal of X if and only if the

fuzzy set η𝐴 and ̅̅̅

ϑ𝐴 are fuzzy KM ideal of X.

Proof:

Let A= (η𝐴 , ϑ𝐴 ) be an intuitionistic fuzzy ideal of X.

Clearly, η𝐴 is a fuzzy KM ideal of X.

For every x, y, z ∈X we have

̅̅̅

ϑ𝐴 (0) = 1- ϑ𝐴 (0) ≥ 1- ϑ𝐴 (x) = ̅̅̅

ϑ𝐴 (x).

̅̅̅

ϑ𝐴 (y⨀ z) = 1- ϑ𝐴 (x) ≥ 1- max{ϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y),ϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x) }

= min {1- ϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y), 1-ϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x)}

= min { ̅̅̅

ϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y), ̅̅̅

ϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x)}

Hence ̅̅̅

ϑ𝐴 is a fuzzy KM ideal of X.

Conversely, assume that η𝐴 and ̅̅̅ ϑ𝐴 are fuzzy KM ideal of X. For every x, y, z ∈X we get

η (0) ≥ η (x), 1- ϑ𝐴 (0) = ̅̅̅

𝐴 𝐴

ϑ𝐴 (0) ≥ ̅̅̅

ϑ𝐴 (x) = 1- ϑ𝐴 (x)

That is,

ϑ𝐴 (0) ≤ ϑ𝐴 (x), η𝐴 (y⨀ z) ≥ min{η𝐴 (x⨀ y), η𝐴 (z⨀ x)}

S. Kailasavalli, C.Yamini, M.Meenakshi and VE.Jayanthi

𝐴 (y⨀ z) ≥ min { ϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y), ϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x)}

≥ min {1- ϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y), 1-ϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x)}

= 1- max{ϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y),ϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x) }

That is, ϑ𝐴 (y⨀ z) ≤max{ϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y),ϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x) }

Hence A= (η𝐴 , ϑ𝐴 ) is an intuitionistic fuzzy ideal of X.

Definition 4.1:

A mapping f: X → Y be a mapping of K-algebras is called a homomorphism if f(x⨀ y) = f(x)

⨀ f(y) ∀ x, y ∈ X.

Definition 4.2:

A mapping f : X → Y be a mapping of K-algebras and α𝐴 be a fuzzy set of Y. The map α𝐴 f is

the pre-image of α𝐴 under f if α𝐴 f (x) = α𝐴 (f(x)).

Definition 4.3:

If f: X → Y is a homomorphism of K-algebras, then f(0) = 0. Let f: X → Y be a homomorphism

of K- algebra for any intuitionistic fuzzy set A= (η𝐴 , ϑ𝐴 ) in Y, we define new intuitionistic fuzzy

setAf = (η𝐴 f, ϑ𝐴 f) in X by

η𝐴 f (x) = η𝐴 (f(x)) ϑ𝐴 f (x) = ϑ𝐴 (f(x)) ∀ x ∈ X.

Theorem 4.4:

Let f: X → Y be a homomorphism of K-algebras. If an intuitionistic fuzzy set A= (η𝐴 , ϑ𝐴 ) in Y

is an intuitionistic fuzzy KM ideal of Y then an intuitionistic fuzzy set Af = (η𝐴 f, ϑ𝐴 f) in X is an

intuitionistic fuzzy KM ideal of X.

Proof:

We first prove that

η𝐴 f (x) = η𝐴 (f(x)) ≤ η𝐴 (0) = η𝐴 𝑓(0)= η𝐴 f (0)

Similarly ϑ𝐴 f (x) = ϑ𝐴 (f(x)) ≥ ϑ𝐴 (0)= ϑ𝐴 𝑓(0)= ϑ𝐴 f (0) ∀ x ∈ X.

Let x, y,z∈ X. Then

min{η𝐴 f (x⨀ y), η𝐴 f (z⨀ x)} = min{ η𝐴 (𝑓(x⨀ y)), η𝐴 (𝑓(z⨀ x))}

= min{ η𝐴 (f(x) ⨀ f(y)), η𝐴 (f(z) ⨀ f(x)}

≤ η𝐴 (f(y) ⨀ f(z))

≤ η𝐴 f(y ⨀ z)

= η𝐴 f (y⨀ z)

max{ ϑ𝐴 f (x⨀ y), ϑ𝐴 f (z⨀ x)} = max{ ϑ𝐴 (𝑓(x⨀ y)), ϑ𝐴 (𝑓(z⨀ x))}

= max{ ϑ𝐴 (f(x) ⨀ f(y)), ϑ𝐴 (f(z) ⨀ f(x)}

≥ ϑ𝐴 (f(y) ⨀ f(z))

≥ ϑ𝐴 f(y ⨀ z)

= ϑ𝐴 f (y⨀ z)

Hence Af = (η𝐴 f, ϑ𝐴 f) is an intuitionistic fuzzy KM ideal of X.

An Intuitionistic Fuzzy Magnified Translation of Km Ideals on K-Algebra

Theorem 4.5:

Let f: X → Y be an epimorphism of K-algebras and let A= (η𝐴 , ϑ𝐴 ) be an intuitionistic fuzzy

set in Y. If Af = (η𝐴 f, ϑ𝐴 f) is an intuitionistic fuzzy KM ideal of X, then A= (η𝐴 , ϑ𝐴 ) is an

intuitionistic fuzzy KM ideal of Y.

Proof:

For any x ∈ Y, there exists a ∈ X such that f(a) = x. Then

η𝐴 (x) = η𝐴 (f(a)) = η𝐴 f (a) ≤ η𝐴 f (0)= η𝐴 (f(0)) = η𝐴 (0)

ϑ𝐴 (x) = ϑ𝐴 (f(a)) = ϑ𝐴 f (a) ≥ ϑ𝐴 f (0)= ϑ𝐴 (f(0)) = ϑ𝐴 (0)

Let x, y, z ∈ Y. Then f(a) = x and f(b) = y and f(c) = z for some a, b, c ∈ X. It follows that

η𝐴 (y⨀z) = η𝐴 (f(b) ⨀ f(c))

= η𝐴 (f(b⨀ c))

= η𝐴 f (b⨀ c)

≥ min{ η𝐴 f (a⨀ b), η𝐴 f (c⨀ a)}

≥ min{ η𝐴 (f(a⨀ b), η𝐴 (f(c⨀ a))}

= min{η𝐴 (f(a) ⨀ f(b)), η𝐴 (f(c) ⨀ f(a)}

= min{η𝐴 (x⨀ y), η𝐴 (z⨀ x)}

ϑ𝐴 (y ⨀z) =ϑ𝐴 ( f(b) ⨀ f(c))

= ϑ𝐴 f(b ⨀ c)

= ϑ𝐴 f (b ⨀ c)

≤ max{ ϑ𝐴 f (a⨀ b), ϑ𝐴 f (c⨀ a)}

≤ max{ ϑ𝐴 (f(a⨀ b), ϑ𝐴 (f(c⨀ a))}

= max{ϑ𝐴 (f(a) ⨀ f(b)), ϑ𝐴 (f(c) ⨀ f(a)}

= max{ϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y), ϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x)}

This completes the proof.

IDEAL

Definition 5.1:

Let A= (η𝐴 , ϑ𝐴 ) be an intuitionistic fuzzy subset of X and β∈ [0,1] and

α ∈[0,1- sup{ η𝐴 (x) + ϑ𝐴 (x): x∈ 𝑋, 0<η𝐴 (x) + ϑ𝐴 (x)<1}].

Then the intuitionistic fuzzy magnified translation (IFMT) T of A is an object of the form

𝐴 𝐴

T = {<x, η(β,α) (x), ϑ(β,α) (x) >: x∈ 𝑋} or briefly as {< (x, η𝑇 (x), ϑ 𝑇 (x)> :

𝐴 𝐴

x∈ 𝑋} where the functions η(β,α) (x) = η𝑇 (x): x→[0,1] and ϑ(β,α) (x) = ϑ 𝑇 (x) : x→[0,1]

are defined as

𝐴

η𝑇 (x) = η(β,α) (x) = βη𝐴 (x) + α,

𝐴

ϑ 𝑇 (x) = ϑ(β,α) (x) = βϑ𝐴 (x) + α for all x∈ 𝑋.

Theorem 5.2:

S. Kailasavalli, C.Yamini, M.Meenakshi and VE.Jayanthi

Let T be an intuitionistic fuzzy KM ideal of X, then the intuitionistic fuzzy magnified translation

of T is an intuitionistic fuzzy KM ideal of X and α ∈[0, T].

Proof:

Let x, y, z ∈ X.

Then assume that η ∈ X and α ∈[0, T]. Then

η𝑇 (0) = βη𝐴 (0) + α≥ βη𝐴 (x) + α= η𝑇 (x)

and η𝑇 (y⨀ z) = βη𝐴 (y⨀z) + α

≥ β min { η𝐴 (x⨀ y), η𝐴 (z⨀ x)} + α

= min { βη𝐴 (x⨀ y) + α, βη𝐴 (z⨀ x) + α}

= min (η𝑇 (x⨀ y), η𝑇 (z⨀ x)} for all x, y, z ∈ X.

Also,

ϑ 𝑇 (0) = βϑ𝐴 (0) + α ≤ βϑ𝐴 (x) + α=ϑ 𝑇 (x)

Andϑ 𝑇 (y⨀ z) = βϑ𝐴 (y⨀ z) + α

≤ β max { ϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y), ϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x)} + α

= max{ βϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y) + α, βϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x) + α}

= max (ϑ 𝑇 (x⨀ y), ϑ 𝑇 (z⨀ x)} for all x, y, z ∈ X.

Therefore, T is an intuitionistic fuzzy magnified translation of KM ideal of X.

Theorem 5.3:

Let Abe an intuitionistic fuzzy subset of K – algebra such that the intuitionistic fuzzy magnified

𝛼 translation T of A is an intuitionistic fuzzy KM ideal of X for some α ∈[0, T]. Then A is an

intuitionistic fuzzy KM ideal of K- algebra on X.

Proof:

Assume that η𝑇(β,α) is a intuitionistic fuzzy KM ideal of X for some α ∈[0, T].

Let x, y, z ∈ X. Then

βη𝐴 (0) + α = η𝑇(β,α) (0) ≥ η𝑇(β,α) (𝑥) = βη𝐴 (x) + α and so η(0)≥ η(x).

Now, we have

βη𝐴 (y⨀ x) + α = η𝑇(β,α) (y⨀ x) ≥ min {η𝑇(β,α) (x⨀ y), η𝑇(β,α) (z⨀ x)} + α

= min { βη𝐴 (x⨀ y) + α, βη𝐴 (z⨀ x) + α}

= min { βη𝐴 (x⨀ y) , βη𝐴 (z⨀ x)} + α

= β min {η𝐴 (x⨀ y) ,η𝐴 (z⨀ x)} + α

which implies that η𝐴 (y⨀ x) ≥ min {η𝐴 (x⨀ y) ,η𝐴 (z⨀ x)}

and

βϑ𝐴 (0) + α = ϑ𝑇(β,α) (0) ≤ ϑ𝑇(β,α) (𝑥) = βϑ𝐴 (x) + α and so ϑ (0)≤ ϑ(x).

βϑ𝐴 (y⨀ z) + α = ϑ𝑇(β,α) (y⨀ z) ≤ max {ϑ𝑇(β,α) (x⨀ y), ϑ𝑇(β,α) (z⨀ x)} + α

= max { βϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y) + α, βϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x) + α}

= max { βϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y) , βϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x)} + α

= β max {ϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y) ,ϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x)} + α

which implies that ϑ𝐴 (y⨀ z) ≤ max {ϑ𝐴 (x⨀ y) ,ϑ𝐴 (z⨀ x)}.

An Intuitionistic Fuzzy Magnified Translation of Km Ideals on K-Algebra

Lemma 5.4:

If 𝐴𝑇(𝛽,𝛼) = (𝜇(𝛽,𝛼)

𝐴 𝐴

, 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) ) is intuitionistic fuzzy magnified translation KM ideal and y≤ 𝑥 in

𝐴 𝐴 𝐴 𝐴 𝐴

X, then 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑦) ≥ 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑥), 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑦) ≤ 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑥) . That is 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) is order reserving and

𝐴

𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) is order preserving.

Proof:

Let x,y∈ 𝑋 be such that y≤ 𝑥, by lemma (3.6) 𝜇𝐴 (𝑦) ≥ 𝜗𝐴 (𝑥)

and

𝐴 𝐴

𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑦) = 𝛽𝜇𝐴 (𝑦) +𝛼 ≥ 𝛽𝜇𝐴 (𝑥) +𝛼 = 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑥)

Also

𝐴 𝐴

𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑦) = 𝛽𝜗𝐴 (𝑦) +𝛼 ≤ 𝛽𝜗𝐴 (𝑥) +𝛼= 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑥)

Hence the proof.

Lemma 5.5:

If 𝐴𝑇(𝛽,𝛼) = (𝜇(𝛽,𝛼)

𝐴 𝐴

, 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) ) is intuitionistic fuzzy magnified translation KM ideal and the

𝐴 𝐴 𝐴 𝐴

inequality 𝑥⨀𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 hold in X, then 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑥) ≥ min(𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑦), 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑧)) and 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑥) ≤

𝐴 𝐴

max(𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑦), 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑧)).

Proof:

Let x,y,z∈ 𝑋 be such that 𝑥⨀𝑦 ≤ 𝑧.

Thus

𝐴

𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑥) = 𝛽𝜇𝐴 (𝑦) +𝛼

≥ 𝛽(min(𝜇𝐴 (𝑦) , 𝜇𝐴 (𝑧))+𝛼

= 𝑚𝑖𝑛(𝛽𝜇𝐴 (𝑦) + 𝛼 , 𝛽𝜇𝐴 (𝑧)+𝛼)

𝐴 𝐴

= min(𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑦), 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑧))

Also

𝐴

𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑥) = 𝛽𝜗𝐴 (𝑦) +𝛼

≤ 𝛽(max(𝜗𝐴 (𝑦) , 𝜗𝐴 (𝑧))+𝛼

= 𝑚𝑎𝑥(𝛽𝜗𝐴 (𝑦) + 𝛼 , 𝛽𝜗𝐴 (𝑧)+𝛼)

𝐴 𝐴

= max(𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑦), 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑧)).

Hence the proof.

IDEAL ON HOMOMORPHISM

S. Kailasavalli, C.Yamini, M.Meenakshi and VE.Jayanthi

Definition 6.1:

Let f: X→ 𝑌 be a homomorphism of K-Algebra, for any intuitionistic fuzzy magnified

𝑓

translation T of A in Y. We define intuitionistic fuzzy magnified Translation 𝐴(𝛽,𝛼) =

𝑓 𝑓

(𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) , 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) ) in X by

𝑓 𝑓

𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑥) = 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) 𝑓(𝑥) and 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑥) = 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) 𝑓(𝑥).

Theorem 6.2:

Let f: X→ 𝑌be a homomorphism of K-Algebra. If an intuitionistic fuzzy set 𝐴(𝛽,𝛼) =

𝑓

(𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) , 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) ) in Y is an intuitionistic fuzzy magnified translation KM-Ideal of Y then 𝐴(𝛽,𝛼) =

𝑓 𝑓

(𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) , 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) ) is an intuitionistic fuzzy magnified translation KM-Ideal of X.

Proof:

For all x,y,z∈ 𝑋, we have

𝑓 𝑓

𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑥) = 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) 𝑓(𝑥) ≤ 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (0) ≤ 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) 𝑓(0) = 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (0)

And

𝑓 𝑓

𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑥) = 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) 𝑓(𝑥) ≥ 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (0) ≥ 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) 𝑓(0) = 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (0)

Now,

𝑓

𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑦 ⊙ 𝑧) = 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) 𝑓(𝑦 ⊙ 𝑧)

= 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑓(𝑦) ⊙ 𝑓(𝑧))

≥ min{𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑓(𝑥) ⊙ 𝑓(𝑦)), 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑓(𝑧) ⊙ 𝑓(𝑥))}

= min{𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑓(𝑥 ⊙ 𝑦)), 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑓(𝑧 ⊙ 𝑥))}

𝑓 𝑓

= 𝑚𝑖𝑛 {𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑥 ⊙ 𝑦), 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑧 ⊙ 𝑥)}

𝑓

𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑦 ⊙ 𝑧) = 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) 𝑓(𝑦 ⊙ 𝑧)

= 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑓(𝑦) ⊙ 𝑓(𝑧))

≤ max{𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑓(𝑥) ⊙ 𝑓(𝑦)), 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑓(𝑧) ⊙ 𝑓(𝑥))}

= max{𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑓(𝑥 ⊙ 𝑦)), 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑓(𝑧 ⊙ 𝑥))}

𝑓 𝑓

= 𝑚𝑎𝑥 {𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑥 ⊙ 𝑦), 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑧 ⊙ 𝑥)}

𝑓 𝑓 𝑓

Hence 𝐴(𝛽,𝛼) = (𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) , 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) ) is an intuitionistic fuzzy magnified translation KM-Ideal of

X.

Theorem 6.3:

Let f: X→ 𝑌be an epimorphism of K-Algebra. If intuitionistic fuzzy set 𝐴(𝛽,𝛼) =

𝑓 𝑓 𝑓

(𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) , 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) )a intuitionistic fuzzy magnified translation in Y. If 𝐴(𝛽,𝛼) = (𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) , 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) )

intuitionistic fuzzy magnified translation KM-Ideal of X, then 𝐴(𝛽,𝛼) = (𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) , 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) )is

intuitionistic fuzzy magnified translation of KM-Ideal in Y.

Proof:

For any x∈ 𝑦, there exists a∈ 𝑥such that f(a) =x

𝑓 𝑓

𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑥) = 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑓(𝑎)) = 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑎) ≤ 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (0) ≤ 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) 𝑓(0) = 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (0)

An Intuitionistic Fuzzy Magnified Translation of Km Ideals on K-Algebra

And

𝑓 𝑓

𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑥) = 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑓(𝑎)) = 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑎) ≥ 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (0) ≥ 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) 𝑓(0) = 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (0)

Now, let x,y,z Y. Then f(a)=x, f(b)=y, f(c)=z for some a, 𝑏, 𝑐 ∈ 𝑧. It follows that

𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑦 ⊙ 𝑧) = 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑓(𝑏) ⊙ 𝑓(𝑐))

= 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑓(𝑏 ⊙ 𝑐))

𝑓

= 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑏 ⊙ 𝑐)

𝑓 𝑓

≥ min {𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑎 ⊙ 𝑏), 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑐 ⊙ 𝑎)}

= min {𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑓(𝑎 ⊙ 𝑏)), 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑓(𝑐 ⊙ 𝑎))}

= min{𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑓(𝑎) ⊙ 𝑓(𝑏)), 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑓(𝑐) ⊙ 𝑓(𝑎))}

= min{𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑥 ⊙ 𝑦), 𝜇(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑧 ⊙ 𝑥)}

and

= 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑓(𝑏 ⊙ 𝑐))

𝑓

= 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑏 ⊙ 𝑐)

𝑓 𝑓

≤ max {𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑎 ⊙ 𝑏), 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑐 ⊙ 𝑎)}

=max{𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑓(𝑎 ⊙ 𝑏)), 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑓(𝑐 ⊙

𝑎))}

=max{𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑓(𝑎) ⊙

𝑓(𝑏)), 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑓(𝑐) ⊙ 𝑓(𝑎))}

= max{𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑥 ⊙ 𝑦), 𝜗(𝛽,𝛼) (𝑧 ⊙ 𝑥)}

Hence the proof.

6. CONCLUSION

The concept of intuitionistic fuzzification of subalgebra and KM ideals of the K-algebra are

tested with some of the properties and the results are presented in this paper. Intuitionistic fuzzy

magnified translations to intuitionistic fuzzy KM ideals in K-algebra properties are tested and

some of the properties are proved. This work is useful for the real time application of decision

making for identifying the diseases.

REFERENCES:

[1] L.A. Zadeh, “ Fuzzy set”, Inform control, 8 (1965),338-353.

[2] K.Iseki and S.Tanaka, “An introduction to the theory of BCK-Algebras, Math, Japonica 23

(1978), no.1, 1-26.

[3] K.Atanassov “ Intutionistic Fuzzy set”, Fuzzy sets and systems, 20(1), (1986), 87-86

[4] S.K.Majunder, S.K.Sardar, “ Fuzzy Magnified translation on groups” Journal of

Mathematics, North Bengal University,1(2),(2008),(17-24).

S. Kailasavalli, C.Yamini, M.Meenakshi and VE.Jayanthi

[5] Young Bae Jun and Kyung Ho Kim, “Intutionistic Fuzzy Ideals of BCK- Algebras”,

Internet.J.Math. & Math.sci. Volume 24, No.12(2000) 839-849

[6] Young Bae Jun “Translation of Fuzzy Ideals in BCK/BCI- Algebras”, Hacettepe Journal of

Mathematics and statistics, Volume 40(3) (2011), 349-358.

[7] Samy M. Mostafa, Tapansenapathi and Reham Ghanem, “ Intutionistic (T,S)- Fuzzy

Magnified Translation Medial Ideals in BCI-Algebras”, Journal of Mathematics and

Informatics, Vol.4,2015,51-69.

[8] P.K. Sharma, “ OnIntutionistic fuzzy magnified translation in Groups” Int.J.of

Mathematical Sciences and applications, Vol.2, No.1,January 2012.

[9] M. Akram and H.S. Kim, “ On K-algebras and BCI Algebras”, International Mathematical

Forum, vol2,No. 9-12, 2007, pp 583-587.

[10] Tapansenapathi, “ Translations of Intutionistic Fuzzy B- algebras”, Fuzzy information and

Engineering,(2015)7:389-404.

[11] Muhammed Akram and Karamat H.Dar, “ Fuzzy Ideals of K- Algebras”, Annals of

university of Craiova, Math.comp.sciser, Volume 34, 2007, page 11-20.

[12] S. Kailasavalli,D.Duraiaruldurgadevi, R.Jaya, M.Meenakshi, N. Nathiya, “ Fuzzy KM

ideals on K-Algebras”, International jounal of pure and Applied Mathematics, vol 119

No.15, 2018, 129-135.

- Fuzzy Based Control Using Labview for Miso Temperature ProcessUploaded byInternational Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology
- Applications of neutrosophic cubic sets in multi-criteria decision makingUploaded byMia Amalia
- ase-knowlean advanced cdge architecture based on fuzzy objectsUploaded byspitraberg
- Fuzzy Set Theory 2015.pptxUploaded byM_Computer
- A Geometric Interpretation of the Neutrosophic Set, A Generalization of the Intuitionistic Fuzzy SetUploaded byAnonymous 0U9j6BLllB
- Report Chapter 3Uploaded byKHAIRUNISA
- Extension of Crisp Functions on Neutrosophic SetsUploaded byAnonymous 0U9j6BLllB
- Sugeno FIS for River EstimationUploaded byEdi Siswanto
- Yan2015 DoneUploaded byali aflah muzakki
- TS FL TutorialUploaded byHazael Ballesteros Moncada
- T3_ANFISs40929-016-0006-3Uploaded byacebenkei
- r05410201 - Neural Networks & Fuzzy LogicUploaded bySRINIVASA RAO GANTA
- SIMILARITY MEASURE BETWEEN POSSIBILITY NEUTROSOPHIC SOFT SETS AND ITS APPLICATIONSUploaded byAnonymous 0U9j6BLllB
- Competencies evaluation based on single valued neutrosophic numbers and decision analysis schemaUploaded byMia Amalia
- NEUTROSOPHIC HYPERIDEALS OF Γ-SEMIHYPERRINGSUploaded byMia Amalia
- 1347950983.pdfUploaded byDida Khaling
- 05359180Uploaded byVamsiKrishna
- 1999-Num Methods for FIVPsUploaded bysusan george
- Power System Stabilizer Using Fuzzy LogicUploaded byVamshi Doneparthi
- Leaning of Anomaly Detection in Network Traffic using Fuzzy ApproachUploaded byInternational Journal for Scientific Research and Development - IJSRD
- 6 ijetstUploaded byTanesan Wyot
- Fuzzy AHP Approach for Supplier Selection in a Washing Machine CompanyUploaded byAna Pires
- Cosine similarity measures of neutrosophic soft setUploaded byMia Amalia
- Aj 02602010207Uploaded byInternational Journal of computational Engineering research (IJCER)
- 04_Artificial Intelligence (1)Uploaded bynvbond
- Reasoning 1Uploaded byMubbashar Mehmodd
- Zalamea – Complex Variable, Existential GraphsUploaded bycsp-peirce
- PBGTUploaded byIshraq Khurshid
- Aggregation of Fuzzy Opinions Under Group Decision MakingUploaded byanacarlabr
- 188. 1-s2.0-S0307904X05001216-mainUploaded byebenesarb

- PRACTICAL DESIGN ANDTESTING OF WIND DRIVEN WATER PUMPINGSYSTEMSUploaded byIAEME Publication
- THE EFFECTS OF AIR-FUEL RATIO ON AUTOMOBILES VIBRATIONSUploaded byIAEME Publication
- A NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND VALIDATION STUDY OF THE MATHEMATICALMODEL OF DROPLET FORMATION IN DROP ONDEMAND INKJET PRINTER AND THE EFFECT OF RHEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF POLYMERINK FOR AUTOMOBILE LIGHTING APPLICATIONUploaded byIAEME Publication
- ASSESSMENT OF SNOW ACCUMULATION AND JUSTIFICATION OFPARAMETERS OF STUBBLE COULISSES INTHE ARID STEPPE OF NORTHERN KAZAKHSTANUploaded byIAEME Publication
- FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OFPOWERTRANSFORMERUploaded byIAEME Publication
- PHOTOVOLTAIC AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF COMPOSITE FILMS OF TETRAPHENYL PORPHYRINAND YTTRIUM VANADATEDOPED WITH EUROPIUM AND BISMUTHUploaded byIAEME Publication
- THE ROLE OF HIGH THROUGHPUT SATELLITE AS SKY HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE TO SUPPORT THE ACCELERATION OF INTERNET ENTRY INTO VILLAGES IN INDONESIAUploaded byIAEME Publication
- ANALYZING FACTORS INFLUENCING INDUSTRIAL COMPETITIVENESS OF THAI SILVER JEWELRY INDUSTRY USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESSUploaded byIAEME Publication
- METHOD FOR EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF RADIOPATHSUploaded byIAEME Publication
- THE COLLAPSE BEHAVIOROFTHE RECTANGULAR HOLLOW PIPES UNDERCOMPRESSION LOADUploaded byIAEME Publication
- IMPROVING THE ADAPTIVE EFFECTING FOR ACTIVE POWER FILTER USING FUZZY CONTROL INTHE DC LINK VOLTAGE’S STABILITY CONTROLLERUploaded byIAEME Publication
- PERFORMANCE ANALYSISOF TURBINE VENTILATORS FOR REFUGEE CAMPS USAGEUploaded byIAEME Publication
- CAUSES OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PUBLIC PROCUREMENT ACT, 2007 AMONG FEDERAL AND STATES TERTIARY INSTITUTIONS IN PROJECT DELIVERY IN SOUTHWEST, NIGERIAUploaded byIAEME Publication
- ADAPTATION OF THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY TO CHANGES IN ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATIONUploaded byIAEME Publication
- DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS NOTES ON WRAPPED EXPONENTIAL DISTRIBUTIONUploaded byIAEME Publication
- THE EFFECT OF BUDGETARY PARTICIPATION, DIFFICULTY LEVEL AND ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE ON THE PERFORMANCE OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALSUploaded byIAEME Publication
- MEASUREMENT OF POWERCONSUMPTION PARAMETERS IN THE PRESENCE OF HIGH HARMONICSUploaded byIAEME Publication
- INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT CUTTER HELIX ANGLE AND CUTTING CONDITION ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS DURING END-MILLING OF C45 STEELUploaded byIAEME Publication
- COMPARISON OF THE DIFFERENT WAYS OF THE BALL BOND WORK INDEX DETERMININGUploaded byIAEME Publication
- SCIENTOMETRICS AS ANINSTRUMENT OF SOCIAL STRATIFICATION IN RUSSIAN SCIENCE AND HIGHER EDUCATIONUploaded byIAEME Publication
- A LITERATURE REVIEW ON PROCESSING AND TESTING OF MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF HYBRID COMPOSITESUSING GRAPHENE/EPOXY WITH ALUMINAUploaded byIAEME Publication
- A STUDY ON PREFERENCES OF FEMALE CUSTOMERS IN THE PURCHASE DECISION OF CARS IN CHENNAIUploaded byIAEME Publication
- EVALUATIONOF IMPLEMENTATIONOF HEALTH AND SAFETYININDUSTRYANDVOCATIONAL SCHOOL IN YOGYAKARTA SPECIAL REGIONUploaded byIAEME Publication
- ANALYSIS OF PERFORMANCECORRELATION OF SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF TIRE AND VEHICLEUploaded byIAEME Publication
- METHODS OF INCREASING THE ABSORPTION CAPACITY OF METALS TO IR RADIATION BY CREATING A SURFACE COMPOSITE LAYER SATURATED WITH NANOMATERIALSUploaded byIAEME Publication
- FATIGUE PERFORMANCE OF THERMAL SPRAY COATINGS ON CARBON STEEL: A REVIEWUploaded byIAEME Publication
- THE EFFECT OF LEADERSHIP ON WORK EFFECTIVENESS OF THECORPS SUPPLY OFFICER AT TNI AL MABES, JAKARTAUploaded byIAEME Publication
- THE INFLUENCE OF THECATHODE SHAPE ON THE PHASE COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE DURING OXIDATIONUploaded byIAEME Publication
- MODELLING AND ANALYSIS OF ROTOR BRAKING SYSTEMUploaded byIAEME Publication

- five e lesson plan- fossilsUploaded byapi-336264987
- AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF CUSTOMERS EXPECTATIONS AND PERCEPTIONS OF SERVICE QUALITY; A CASE STUDY OF NAKUMATT MEGASTORES IN KENYA.Uploaded byInternational Jpurnal Of Technical Research And Applications
- Nail ManufacturingUploaded byNurfida A Effendi
- U04 Fxs of Humeral ShaftUploaded byadrian_mogos
- Corpus LinguisticsUploaded byidolman
- Caltex Australia CTX 2017 Annual Report (2)Uploaded byAarti J
- DCX 8510 8 untoldUploaded byender40
- F.F. Grinstein and J.P. Boris- Numerical Simulation of Unsteady Buoyant Flows in BuildingsUploaded byTremann
- Kalwarf 1988 - Evaluation of Furcation Response to Perio TherapyUploaded byBryan Hee
- Orgo SyllabusUploaded byMarcus Bell
- ShopperWk._1Uploaded byheralddrupal
- Preface to the First EditionUploaded byMani Pillai
- Beer Dinamica_Capitulo 14Uploaded byGustavo Stelzner
- 2IJESRAPR20192Uploaded byTJPRC Publications
- BPPUploaded byayyagarisri
- Pochhacker - Getting Organized in Community InterpretingUploaded byMaria Aguilar
- Chap 09 ModUploaded byRonald Wichhart
- 4Laws HowToUploaded byOlivia Lim
- Driving Spirit at Gusev Crater.pdfUploaded byvitocatozzo
- AEW Catalog - Lapidary Equipment (1)Uploaded byJoan Milok
- Programming LanguagesUploaded byemp_azteca
- article summary enriching the sea to deathUploaded byapi-236051971
- Profit201105 DlUploaded byAlok Garg
- SYY Sysco Investor Day Presentation 2017Uploaded byAla Baster
- FourUploaded byrohitraveendran
- Eklampsi Antepartum Hellp Syndrom + DIC + IctericUploaded byKurnia Sari Syaiful
- Learning Theory (Social Constructivism) ELTUploaded byAnne Zakaria
- fxtradermagazine_4_egUploaded byDoncov Engeny
- jataka matchingUploaded bySai Ranganath B
- accreditation requirements hemodialysisUploaded byplethoraldork