0 views

Uploaded by e

falt

- Or201che-Advanced Transport Phenomena
- River Hydraulics, US Army Corps of Engineers
- MECH Engg RGTU syllabud - 3rd to 6th sem
- PipeFlow1Single-phaseFlowAssurance
- ALAdwani Thesis
- Course Schedule Pr 201819 1
- PRESSURE DROP ANALYSIS OF 1.6L CAR AIR INTAKE SYSTEM
- tutorial gambit
- Paper
- Coriolis Flow Meter
- Finite Element Study of the Mass Transfer in Annular Reactor
- Simplified Equations of Flow in Gas Dirve Reservoirs and the Theoretical Foundation of Multiphase Pressure Buildup Analyses
- CFD MODELLING OF LIQUID JET AND CASCADE BREAKUP IN CROSSFLOWS
- Section2 Module7 Direct Integration
- SOLIDSW_CFD_technical_reference.pdf
- Gas Dynamics1stclass
- 7487851
- THER103 SFEE Applications
- A a a a 1
- (Info) Rosemunt Multivariable Transmitter

You are on page 1of 7

Hui Sun1, Odd M. Faltinsen1, 2

1

Centre for Ships and Ocean Structures, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Noway

2

Department of Marine Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

ABSTRACT often simply accounted for by including hydrostatic

A numerical method based on 2D+t theory was developed restoring forces in those approaches.

to study the unsteady hydrodynamic problem of a semi- A 2D+t method combined with BEM (Boundary Element

displacement ship at high forward speeds. The ship was Method) is proven to be efficient in solving the strongly

forced to oscillate in heave as it was advancing at a high nonlinear hydrodynamic problems for high-speed vessels.

speed. In the 2D+t theory, the original three-dimensional Nonlinearities in the free-surface conditions and gravity

(3D) problem was simplified as fully nonlinear two- effects can be easily included and it often demands less time

dimensional (2D) time-dependent problems in cross planes. than fully 3D computations. Many examples of the 2D+t

A boundary element method was used to solve the 2D theory are illustrated in Faltinsen (2005). Fontaine and

problems, in which a flow-separation model was applied to Tulin(1998) gave a good review of the evolution and

simulate the non-viscous flow separation from the round application of nonlinear 2D+t theory. Faltinsen & Zhao

bilge. The sectional hydrodynamic vertical forces were (1991) proposed a 2.5D theory, a different version of the

calculated by pressure integration. Thereafter, the evaluated 2D+t theory, where the steady flow could be nonlinear;

sectional added mass and damping coefficients were interactions between the nonlinear steady flow and the

compared with published experimental and numerical linear unsteady flow were considered through some

results. The local steady flow and unsteady flow were interaction terms. Later, Zhao et al. (1997) employed 2D+t

solved as a whole, so the interactions between them were theory to prismatic planing vessels at very high speed.

automatically included. The present calculations yielded Following Zhao et al.’s (1997) work, we extended the 2D+t

better agreement with the experiments than the earlier theory to be applied to the steady and unsteady problems of

numerical results by a 2.5D theory, especially for the lower prismatic planing vessels with effects of gravity in Sun &

frequencies. The three-dimensional effects neglected in the Faltinsen (2007a, 2007b) and to the steady motion of a

2D+t theory at the bow and the stern could be the reasons semi-displacement ship in Sun & Faltinsen (2010). In the

for the discrepancies at those positions between the present present work, the 2D+t theory is generalized to the unsteady

results and the experiments. problem for the semi-displacement ship with round bilges.

KEY WORDS The difficulties for the present problem are mainly related to

2D+t theory; high-speed ships; flow separation; forced the hull shape. First, the geometry of the hull is more

Oscillations complicated. One must have smooth lines of the hull and the

normal vectors must vary smoothly along the ship length.

1.0 INTRODUCTION This aspect has been discussed in Sun & Faltinsen (2010).

The hydrodynamics of high-speed vessels are increasingly Secondly, the flow separation from the round bilge induces

concerned when fast ships are more widely utilized. For complicated water flow, which demands careful numerical

normal displacement ships, the conventional strip theory treatments to control the flow separation in the simulations.

(see Salvesen et al. 1970) can give satisfactory results. More numerical efforts are needed for the present unsteady

However, its validity can be questioned for the semi- problem than for the steady problem. The calculated

displacement vessels (0.4-0.5<Fn<1.0-1.2) and the planing sectional added mass and damping coefficients are

vessels (Fn >1.0-1.2). (Those ranges for Froude number are compared with Keuning’s (1988) experiments and Faltinsen

given e.g. in Faltinsen 2005). A reason is the fact that the & Zhao’s (1991) calculations.

nonlinearities become more significant for higher-speed When we solve the steady problem, the present theory is

ships. Thus, some nonlinear models were developed for equivalent to the 2.5D theory in Faltinsen & Zhao (1991).

ships at higher speeds. For example, Zarnick (1978), Fujino However, for the unsteady problems, the present method is

& Chiu (1983) incorporate nonlinear effects in predicting different from their 2.5D theory in two aspects. First, the

the dynamic responses of high-speed ships in waves. steady and unsteady flows were separately solved in

Further, the effect of forward speed are not sufficiently Faltinsen & Zhao (1991) while in the present method the

considered in the conventional strip theory, neither in those steady and unsteady flows are simulated as a whole.

improved nonlinear models, because the forward speed in Secondly, the unsteady flow is assumed linear and solved in

the free-surface conditions is not considered in those the frequency domain in their method. However, in the

methods. In addition, the gravity effect on the water flow is present approach, the nonlinear free-surface conditions are

satisfied in the time-domain simulations, so the nonlinear and η3a and η5a are the amplitudes of oscillations in heave

effects in both the steady flow and the unsteady flow are and in pitch, respectively. Although the results to be

taken into account. We can see that our results manifest presented only involve heave motion, this theory is

better agreement with experiments especially for lower developed for both heave and pitch. The heave is positive

frequencies, at which interactions between the steady flow when it is upward and the pitch is positive when the bow is

and the unsteady flow is stronger. going up. The instantaneous trim angle is θ(t) = τ + η5(t)

A boundary element method described in Sun & Faltinsen where τ is the trim angle of the hull in the steady motion.

(2006, 2007a) was used to solve the 2D water flow in the A velocity potential φ(x,y,z,t) is introduced to describe the

2D+t theory. The thin jet running along the body surface water flow around the vessel. The velocity potential satisfies

and the separated jet were cut away to avoid numerical the three-dimensional Laplace equation. Fully nonlinear

difficulties. A flow separation model developed in Sun & free-surface conditions and exact body boundary conditions

Faltinsen (2006) was applied to simulate the non-viscous are satisfied in three dimensions as follows

flow separation from the round bilge.

nX X nZ Z on the hull surface (2)

Some difference between the calculations and experiments n

can be seen near the stern and the bow. At those positions,

1 2

there are 3D effects neglected in the 2D+t theory, which can x y2 z2 g 0 on z ( x, y, t ) (3)

be the reason for the discrepancies. t 2

The 2D+t theory has been used to solve the seakeeping Dx Dy Dz

, , on z ( x, y, t ) (4)

problem of prismatic planing vessels in Sun & Faltinsen Dt x Dt y Dt z

(2011) where we introduced the effects of incident waves.

Similarly, the present method can be developed to study the where n = (nX, nY, nZ) = (nx, ny, nz) is the normal vector on

wave induced motions of the semi-displacement ships. the hull surface expressed respectively in the hull-fixed

coordinate system and the Earth-fixed coordinate system, g

2.0 2D+t THEORY

is the acceleration of gravity and the free surface is

A ship is advancing forward at speed U as shown in Fig.1. expressed by z ( x, y, t ) . The dot above X and Z means the

Two coordinate systems are introduced, i.e. an Earth-fixed first time derivative. At a given x-y-z position, the

coordinate system xyz and a hull-fixed coordinate system corresponding X- and Z- coordinates are changing with

XYZ. The xy plane is in the calm water surface and the z- time. From equation (1), one has

axis is pointing upwards. The ship is moving along the

negative x-direction. The origin of XYZ is fixed at the X x g cos zg sin Z (5)

centre of gravity (COG) of the ship. The X-axis is pointing

to the stern and the Y-axis is towards the starboard. The Z x g sin z g cos X (6)

pitch angle θ is defined positive when the bow is going up.

The position of the COG in the Earth-fixed coordinate where the time derivatives can be expressed as x g = –U,

system is denoted as (xg, 0, zg). Initially, xg = 0 at t = 0. The z g 3 and 5 .

hull-fixed coordinates can be related to the Earth-fixed

coordinates by A slenderness ratio is now introduced as ε = d/L, where d is

the draft and L is the length of the hull. By using slender

X ( x xg ) cos ( z z g ) sin body assumption, one has ∂/∂x~O(ε), ∂/∂y~O(1), ∂/∂z~O(1).

Y y (1) Further, ∂/∂X ~O(ε) , ∂/∂Y~O(1), ∂/∂Z ~O(1) and it is

Z ( x x ) sin ( z z ) cos assumed that the pitch angle is small. The Froude number is

g g

assumed as O(1). Neglecting the terms of the order of O(ε2)

in the governing equation and the boundary conditions

given in equations (2)-(4), one can reduce the 3D problem to

Z time-dependent 2D problems in Earth-fixed vertical planes

U Y z y

as the ship is penetrating the planes from the right to the left.

We call those planes as cross planes. The velocity potential

θ

X0 ( y, z, t ) satisfies the 2D Laplace equation in the yz

x coordinates and the following boundary conditions.

X

nX X nZ Z on the hull surface (7)

N

Fig. 1. Coordinate systems.

1 2

y z2 g 0 on z ( x, y , t ) (8)

t 2

The ship can be moving steadily forward or forced to

oscillate in heave or pitch motions. The heave and pitch Dy Dz

, on z ( x, y , t ) (9)

motions are given as η3= -η3a sin(ωt) and η5 = -η5a sin(ωt) Dt y Dt z

(t>=0) respectively, where ω is the frequency of oscillations

where N =( ny, nz ) is the projection of the normal vector to 1 2

p pa gz (12)

the vertical 2D plane. t 2

When the ship is advancing steadily or with oscillations in where pa is the atmospheric pressure and ρ is the water

heave and/or pitch, the flow field is symmetric about the x-z density. The ∂φ/∂t is calculated by

plane in 3D and symmetric about the z-axis in the cross

d

plane. As shown in Fig.2, only one half domain is VP (13)

considered. Thus, at y = 0, there is a symmetry line t dt P

boundary. Zero normal velocity condition is fulfilled on this

where dφ/dt is evaluated by tracking a point P on the section

boundary. In addition, the rigid bottom boundary condition

and the far-field conditions will be satisfied. in the plane and VP is the velocity of the point.

In the computations, the time-dependent 2D problem

z Ship section described in the last section is solved in a series of cross

planes intersecting the hull surface. The procedure of doing

the calculations and the numerical methods will be

explained as follows.

y

Ω Truncation 3.1 Calculation procedures

Symmetry line boundary The numerical simulation can be done in the following

Bottom

steps:

1) Select a number of equally spaced cross planes in

the Earth-fixed coordinate system, such as in Fig. 3

where the number of planes is 20;

Fig. 2. The fluid domain in a 2D vertical plane. 2) Initialize the calculations in each plane;

3) Solve the boundary integral equation in each plane

For a steady problem, one has X U cos and Z U sin by using the 2D BEM;

from equations (5) and (6), so the body boundary condition 4) Advance the hull forward and update the hull

can be written as surface and the free surface;

5) Treat the thin jet and the flow separation;

nX U cos nZ U sin Unx (10)

N 6) Save the results at each plane;

where nx is the x-component of the normal vector to the 7) Step forward to the next time step;

ship surface expressed in the Earth-fixed coordinate system. 8) If the ship advances forward for a distance equal to

This body boundary condition agrees with the one presented the interval of the cross planes, then we stops the

in Faltinsen & Zhao (1991). If we focus our attention at a calculations at the last plane behind the ship and

cross plane in front of the advancing ship, then as the ship is introduce a new plane in front of the ship and

penetrating the plane, we can see in the plane a scenario of a initialize the calculation in the new plane. Go to

2D body moving vertically on the free surface. Both the step 3);

vertical speed and the shape of the body are varying in the 9) Stop the calculation when the simulation lasts for a

plane. For a prismatic planing hull, i.e. a hull with constant long enough time.

cross-section and straight keel, we can see in the cross plane

the water entry of a wedge (Zhao et al.’s 1997, Sun & At t = 0, the hull is travelling at a constant speed with a

Faltinsen 2007a). given trim angle and a given sinkage. The initial free-

surface positions and the velocity potential on the free

In the unsteady problem, the body boundary condition can surface are taken from the calculations of the steady

be written as problem. The free surface is updated at each time step by

integrating the free-surface conditions in equations (8) and

nX U cos 3 sin Z5

N (11) (9). The calculated sectional forces at the cross planes are

nZ U sin 3 cos X 5 used to approximate the sectional force distribution along

the ship (Fig. 3), which is denoted as F32D(x). At the bow,

At each time step, the sectional vertical force at a given the sectional force is assumed to change linearly from the

cross plane is obtained by integrating the pressure properly frontmost hull-water intersection position xbow to the plane

on the section surface. From Bernoulli’s equation, one can 20. The vertical force at a given hull-fixed X-position can be

write the pressure as obtained by interpolation.

the field point P in the fluid domain Ω. By letting the field

U

point P approach S, an integral equation can be obtained.

Now we assume that at a certain time instant the φ on the

free surface and the ∂φ/∂n on the body surface are known.

Solving the integral equation, one can obtain the velocity

potential φ on the body surface and the normal velocity

∂φ/∂n on the free surface. The free-surface elevation and the

velocity potential on the free surface for the next time

instant can be updated by integrating the free-surface

21 20 … 6 … 2 1

F32D

conditions with respect to time.

Linear In the BEM, the thin jet along the body surface is cut off.

approximation

When the water flow separates along the round bilge in the

cross plane, a flow separation model described in detail in

Obtained by

section 3.3 is applied in the BEM solver. The separated

the BEM water represents a jet flow along the sides of the section that

x

will turn over to hit the water surface underneath. To

xbow x20 … x6 … x2 x1 circumvent the simulation of the water-water impact and

thus induced vorticties, we cut away the separated thin jet

before it falls onto the underlying water surface.

Fig. 3. Numerical strategies of the 2D+t calculations.

3.3 Non-viscous flow separation model

When a new plane is introduced, we need to specify the Non-viscous flow separation can happen from the round

initial conditions in this plane. Mackie (1962)’s solution of bilge of the hull. As the jet is running fast around the bilge

the water entry of a sharp wedge is employed here to give with large curvature, the speed of the running jet can be so

the initial conditions of the elevation and velocity potential high that the pressure on the jet-hull interface relative to the

of the free surface as follows. A small distance of the atmospheric pressure outside the jet becomes negative.

section has submerged into the water. This treatment When the area with pressure lower than atmospheric

follows Maruo & Song (1994). pressure is large enough, the air can easily ventilate the jet-

1 hull interface and make the jet leave the body surface, which

1 1

z (y) ln(1 2 ) 2 y tan ( ) 2 (14) means the flow separation occurs. This nonlinear

y y phenomenon needs special treatments.

1 y ( z )2 The flow separation model proposed in Sun & Faltinsen

2 0 y ( z ) 2

( y) ln d (15)

(2006) is applied here. In that paper, the model was

where y y / s , z z / s , /(Vs ) , s is the submergence employed to simulate the water impact of a circular

cylinder. At each time step, the pressure on a section surface

of the wedge, V is the water entry speed of the wedge,

needs to be determined. Then the size of the section surface

/ 2 is half the apex angle of the thin wedge and where the pressure is lower than pa is checked. If the size is

is the deadrise angle. For the present hull shape, V is larger than a specified value, we then change this part of

approximated by V=U tan45º=U. Since this approximation water-body interface as free surface, say, the segment AB in

only affects the initial conditions, the final results will not Fig. 4. The boundary AB is then updated to its new position

be apparently influenced by the approximation of V. A1B1 by using the free-surface conditions (8) and (9), and

3.2 2D boundary element method A1 is attached to the body surface. The velocities of the

points on AB follow from a local analytical solution around

The 2D boundary value problem expressed by the Laplace the separation position, rather than their velocities on the

equation and the boundary conditions in Eqs. (7)-(9) is body surface. We then connect A1B1 with the updated free

solved by a boundary element method (BEM) described in surface B1C1 to form the new free surface A1B1C1. The

Sun & Faltinsen (2006, 2007a). Straight line elements are point A1 is the separation position, i.e. the new water-hull

used to discretize the closed boundary S, which consists of intersection, which locates near the point where the

the body surface, the free surface, the truncation boundary, calculated pressure on the section changes from positive to

the bottom surface and the symmetry line surface (Fig. 2.). negative. Thus the flow separation is forced to occur

Variables change linearly on each element. Green’s second numerically.

identity gives

In the unsteady problem studied in this paper, the oscillatory

G P, Q Q vertical velocity of the ship section adds to complexity in

2 P Q G P, Q dsQ (16) the flow separation especially for the higher frequency

S

nQ nQ cases. The separated flow may reattach to the hull surface.

where the Green function G(P,Q) = log r(P,Q) and r(P,Q) is This is simply treated by ignoring the thin air cavity

the distance from a source point Q on the fluid boundary to enclosed and setting a new water-body intersection.

Section coefficients in the static position with trim and sinkage were

surface used to calculate the added mass.

B1

5.0 Numerical results

B

Before the ship is forced to oscillate, it is advancing at a

A1

Free constant speed (Fn = 1.14) with constant trim angle τ =1.62º

surface and constant sinkage z0=-0.004m. Fig. 6 shows the free-

A surface elevations around the ship sections from station 0 to

station 19. The pictures for station 0-8 are shown on the left

C C1 side, while the rest on the right side. We can see the flow

Initially calm free surface separation from the round bilge. The separated water

gradually comes down under the effect of gravity and

Fig. 4. Non-viscous flow separation from the round bilge. propagates away from the ship. More discussions on the

results for steady motions can be found in Sun & Faltinsen

(2010). The free-surface elevations shown in Fig. 6 together

with the velocity potential on the free surfaces will then

used as the initial conditions in the 20 cross planes in the

unsteady simulations.

Free surface

0.2 Hull surface

0.1

z (m)

0.0

Keuning[1]’s model test is studied in this paper. The body

plan of the model is shown in Fig. 5. The main particulars -0.1

meters. The breadth of the waterline is 0.25 m. The draft is -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3

coefficient is 0.396. Two advancing speeds, corresponding Fig. 6. Free-surface profiles in steady planing.

to two Froude numbers Fn = U/(gL)1/2= 0.57 and 1.14, were

used in the model tests. Here the case with Fn = 1.14 is

studied. The model was divided into seven segments of In the calculations for the unsteady problem, 20 equally-

equal length of 0.285 meters. On each segment the dynamic spaced cross planes are used at any time instant. As the ship

vertical force was measured. When the model was running moves forward, new planes are continuously added and the

steadily on the calm water, its trim angle and sinkage were planes left behind the ship are discarded accordingly. Now

set by referring to the experimental data from some other we introduce a hull-fixed X0-coordinate. It coincides with

model tests. The trim angle is τ =1.62 degrees. The value of the X-axis as shown in Fig. 1, but with origin at the aft-

sinkage was not directly given in Keuning (1988). However, perpendicular and it positive direction towards the bow.

from the figure of measured wave profile along the model in Given a hull-fixed X0-position, one can interpolate the

the report, the sinkage is digitized as z0=-0.004m. In doing sectional vertical force at this position. The time history of

so, the center of rotation in trim is assumed to locate in the the sectional vertical force at a given X0-position can be

midship and at the waterline. The negative value means that expanded as a Fourier series

the model is moved downwards. In the forced oscillation

tests, the model was forced to oscillate in heave from the f (t ) C0 [Csn sin( nt ) Ccn cos( n t )] (17)

mean position with the given trim and sinkage. The n 1

amplitude of the heave motion was η3a=0.01m. The various where C0, Csn and Ccn (n=1,2,3…) are constants. The

oscillation frequencies were ω = 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15 sectional added mass coefficient a33 and the damping

rad/s. Keuning (1988) presented the sectional added mass coefficient b33 can be estimated from the amplitudes of the

a33 and sectional damping coefficient b33 for the seven first harmonic Cs1 and Cc1 as

segments. The in-phase component and the quadrature

Cs1 c333 a

component of the dynamic forces were measured. The in- a33 (18)

phase component and the measured restoring force 23a

Cc1 similar ship model. However, the results for ω = 9 was not

b33 (19) given in Faltinsen & Zhao (1991), so we could not compare

3a

the results for this frequency.

where c33 is the sectional restoring force coefficient, which It is noticed that the present numerical method encounters

is defined in the same way as in the experiments. The ship numerical difficulties for very high frequencies, such as for

model is first settled in its static position with the given trim ω = 15 rad/s. Frequent detachment and reattachment of the

and sinkage, then the sectional restoring force coefficient is water flow along the hull occur at around station 7 and

calculated by c33 = ρgswp, where swp is the breadth of the station 8 and causes many jumps in the time series of the

waterline at the section. sectional forces. Smaller time steps can be used to improve

The sectional hydrodynamic coefficients at 20 hull sections the accuracy of the results and then reduce the occurrence

with X0=0~1.9m are calculated. The coefficients at and amplitude of the jumps. Because those jumps occur

X0=2.0m are simply approximated as zero. The numerical with very short time duration, the time integrations in

results for the three different frequencies ω = 5, 11, 15 rad/s calculating Cs1 and Cc1 suppress the effects of the jumps.

are shown in Fig. 7 (added mass coefficients) and Fig. 8 Actually, the 2D+t theory is not suitable for very high

(damping coefficients). The experimental results are the frequencies in principle because the incident wavelength

average values on each segment in the model tests. should be O(L) or larger.

In general, the present numerical results agree well with the

experimental results for all frequencies studied here. If we 100

look closely at the bow and the stern, we will see some rad/s

difference. At the stern, the added mass is underestimated at 50

frequencies by our numerical method. The predicted

a33 (kg/m)

0

experimental values for all the frequencies. Due to the flow -50

should be atmospheric pressure. However, the 2D+t theory -100

hydrodynamic coefficients different from the experiments.

0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0

X0-distance from stern (m)

At the bow, the averaged added mass is negative on the first 40

calculated negative added mass values are much lower. The

3D effect at the bow causes the water near the bow to run up 20

along the stem relative to the initial calm water level. This

a33 (kg/m)

Therefore, the difference in a33 near the bow can be caused 0

by the 3D effects.

The numerical results in Faltinsen & Zhao (1991) are also -20

presented in Fig. 7 and Fig. 8. The present numerical results 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0

show obvious better agreement with experiments than their X0-distance from stern (m)

results for the lower frequency ω = 5 rad/s. The agreement 40

with experiments for ω = 11 rad/s and 15 rad/s looks rad/s

similar, although the a33 by Faltinsen & Zhao (1991) shows

a little better agreement for ω = 15 rad/s. Keuning (1988) 20

a33 (kg/m)

frequencies. The improvements in the present results for the 0

and unsteady flow is better accounted for than those in -20

Faltinsen & Zhao (1991). They solved the steady and

unsteady flow separately and considered the interactions 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0

X0-distance from stern (m)

through some interaction terms; however, the steady and

unsteady flow is solved as a whole in the present method.

The nonlinearities in the unsteady flow were neglected in Fig. 7. Sectional heave added mass coefficients. Solid lines:

their method, but it is not clear whether this effect is experiments by Keuning (1988); Lines with symbol: the

important. Nonlinear effects should be the largest around the present numerical results; Dashed lines: numerical results by

natural frequency when one considers the responses in Faltinsen & Zhao (1991).

regular waves. The natural frequency for heave is around ω

= 9 according to Blok & Beukelman (1984)’s results for a

230 © 2011 American Society of Naval Engineers

rad/s

the unsteady flow and the local steady flow is better

300

accounted for in the present method for the lower frequency.

The present method can be further developed to predict the

200

vertical motions of high-speed vessel in head sea. Care must

b33 (kg/(sm))

100

should be paid to the 3D effects at the bow and the stern

REFERENCES

0

Faltinsen, O.M. (2005). Hydrodynamics of High-Speed

0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 Marine Vehicles. New York: Cambridge University

X0-distance from stern (m) Press.

Faltinsen, O.M., Zhao, R. (1991). "Numerical Prediction of

300 rad/s ship Motions at High Forward Speed." Phil. Trans. R.

Soc. Lond., Vol. 334, pp.241-252.

200 Fontaine, E., Tulin, M.P. (1998). “On the prediction of

b33 (kg/(sm))

2D+t theory: the evolution of an idea.” RTO AVT

100

symposium on Fluid Dynamic Proflems of Vehicles

Operating near or in the Air-Sea Interface, Amsterdam,

0

The Netherlands, October, 1998.

Fujino, M., Chiu, F.C. (1983). “Vertical motions of high-

0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0

X0-distance from stern (m)

speed boats in head sea and wave loads.” J Soc Nav

Arch Japan 154:151-162

300 rad/s Keuning, J.A. (1988). Distributon of Added Mass and

Damping along the Length of a Ship Model Moving at

High Forward Speed, Delft University of Technology

200

Report No.817-P

b33 (kg/(sm))

100 Wave Breaking and Deck Wetness of a High-Speed Ship

by The Parabolic Approximation." Proc. 20th

0 Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, University of

California, Santa Barbara, California.

0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 Salvesen, N., Tuck, E.O., Faltinsen, O.M. (1970). “Ship

X0-distance from stern (m)

Motions and sea loads.” Trans. SNAME 78: pp.250-287.

Fig. 8. Sectional heave damping coefficients. Solid lines: Sun, H., Faltinsen, O.M. (2006). “Water Impact of

experiments by Keuning (1988); Lines with symbol: the Horizontal Circular Cylinders and Cylindrical Shells.”

present numerical results; Dashed lines: numerical results by Appl. Ocean Res. 28, 299-311.

Faltinsen & Zhao (1991). Sun, H., Faltinsen, O.M. (2007a). "The Influence of Gravity

on the Performance of Planing Vessels in Calm Water."

6.0 CONCLUSIONS J. Eng. Math., Vol. 58, pp.91-107.

A 2D+t theory was applied to simulate the forced oscillation Sun, H., Faltinsen, O.M. (2007b). "Hydrodynamic Forces on

in heave of a semi-displacement ship at high forward speed. a Planing Hull in Forced Heave or Pitch Motions in

The results for the steady motion were given as the initial Calm water." Proc. 22nd International Workshop on

conditions for the solution of unsteady problem. Water Waves and floating Bodies, Plitvice, Croatia.

Hydrodynamic pressure was calculated and integrated to Sun H., Faltinsen O.M. (2010). “Numerical study of a semi-

calculate the sectional hydrodynamic forces. Therefore the displacement ship at high speed.” Proceedings of 29th

sectional added mass and damping coefficients obtained International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic

form the sectional hydrodynamic forces are compared with Engineering, Shanghai, China, 2010.

the experimental results for different oscillation frequencies. Sun, H., Faltinsen, O.M. (2011). “Dynamic motions of

Generally good agreement is obtained. Discrepancies are planing vessels in head sea.” Journal of Marine Science

noticed near the bow and the stern, which can be caused by and Technology, DOI : 10.1007/s00773-011-0123-4.

the three-dimensional effects neglected in the 2D+t theory. Zarnick, E.E. (1978). A nonlinear mathematical model of

Strongly nonlinear free-surface flow, such as the jet running motions of planing boat in regular waves. David W.

up along the hull and the flow separation from the round Taylor Naval ship R&D Centre,USA,DTNSRDC-78/032

bilge, were simulated in the present method. The Zhao, R., Faltinsen, O.M., Haslum, H.A. (1997). “A

interactions between the nonlinear steady and unsteady flow Simplified Nonlinear Analysis of a High-Speed Planing

were taken into account automatically because they were Craft in Calm Water.” Proc. Fourth International

solved as a whole. By referring to an earlier work based on a Conference on Fast Sea Transportation (FAST'97),

similar 2.5D method, we can see that the coupling between Sydney, Australia.

- Or201che-Advanced Transport PhenomenaUploaded bySRINIVASA RAO GANTA
- River Hydraulics, US Army Corps of EngineersUploaded byDipro Sarkar
- MECH Engg RGTU syllabud - 3rd to 6th semUploaded bybhustlero0o
- PipeFlow1Single-phaseFlowAssuranceUploaded byMubarik Ali
- ALAdwani ThesisUploaded byamir_hayfa
- Course Schedule Pr 201819 1Uploaded byPrasad
- PRESSURE DROP ANALYSIS OF 1.6L CAR AIR INTAKE SYSTEMUploaded bychoiwon1
- tutorial gambitUploaded bybayuherypurnomo
- PaperUploaded bybbmoksh
- Coriolis Flow MeterUploaded bySerkan Cenberlitas
- Finite Element Study of the Mass Transfer in Annular ReactorUploaded byYehia El Shazly
- Simplified Equations of Flow in Gas Dirve Reservoirs and the Theoretical Foundation of Multiphase Pressure Buildup AnalysesUploaded bymiguel_jose123
- CFD MODELLING OF LIQUID JET AND CASCADE BREAKUP IN CROSSFLOWSUploaded byAfshin Bi
- Section2 Module7 Direct IntegrationUploaded bySermed Al-Wasiti
- SOLIDSW_CFD_technical_reference.pdfUploaded byAntonio Julián Sánchez Nuño
- Gas Dynamics1stclassUploaded byJoe Scribd
- 7487851Uploaded byLê Quang Duy
- THER103 SFEE ApplicationsUploaded byshanecarl
- A a a a 1Uploaded byAbed Alhaleem Altell
- (Info) Rosemunt Multivariable TransmitterUploaded byairsnow
- FM - BY Civildatas.com.pdfUploaded byprakashmenmoli
- EM Brochure Nonlinear Dynamics 2008Uploaded bychandan_j4u
- PhD Thesis: Physics of Layered MicroflowsUploaded byJason Ryan Picardo
- Input DataUploaded byVicked Sunny
- MAE02_L2_IdealGasUploaded bypsppunk7182
- Procedure , Abs and Obj , ApendixUploaded bysolihin
- OTC-23968-MS-P.pdfUploaded byTatiany
- SPE-930Uploaded byDor So
- The International Journal of Engineering and Science (The IJES)Uploaded bytheijes
- quizlet lesson planUploaded byapi-443507800

- Offshore FatigueUploaded byNavab Khan
- 75m_supply-vessel-full-specification_ahsv.pdfUploaded byDavid Huwae
- OffshoreDesignManual (Very Important From ONGC)Uploaded bypokiri
- Freeboard CalculationsUploaded byTommyVercetti
- 374961209-tutorial1-150916211323-lva1-app6891Uploaded bye
- Inclining Test Procedure-exampleUploaded bytalabiz
- 007Uploaded byrsharma_531647
- TR290.pdfUploaded bythongchai_007
- Structural Design of a Semi-Submersible Platform With Water-Entrapment Plates Based on a Time-Domain Hydrodynamic Algorithm Coupled With Finite-ElementsUploaded bysaeed-21
- 317980791-I-RL-3010-0F-1350-960-PPC-004-CUploaded bye
- 324625177 MS L Lifting OperationsUploaded bye
- 244953896 Tonnage CalculationUploaded bye
- Member ConnectionUploaded bymyusuf_engineer
- 336871555-B-25Uploaded bye
- Item 01 Report for Inclining Experiment-Acergy Polaris Rev3Uploaded byapi-3704641
- 361656603 Chk List Green PowerUploaded bye
- 242198790 Offshore Well Construction Preview AUploaded bye
- 302088515 Te1010304 Sa 0101 Rev 1 Catwalk Bridge Technical Description and Main DataUploaded bye
- Tow Approval ReportUploaded bydiegocely700615
- Copy of 201936900 CEN TOOL Standard Padeyes V4 Rollup Padeye SheaveUploaded byMarvan
- 251300047 Lugs CalculationsUploaded bye
- Marine_Insurance_Glossary.pdfUploaded byalonso_r
- 294265508 TowingSailaway Transportation and Installation PlanUploaded bye
- [000605]Uploaded byEberth Cardozo

- MODULE CH--7Uploaded byeph
- Dimensional AnalysisUploaded bySiimple Opinion Final
- Pipeline Design for Effluent Transport in Common Effluent Treatment PlantsUploaded byEswaramoorthi Sellappa Gounder
- Solution Branching and Dive Plane Reversal of Submarines at Low SpeedsUploaded bynatalaric
- Dr. Md. Quamrul Islam, Sir’s Class Notes (05 Batch) QISUploaded byFaisal Saif
- SW Volume 4 Design Manual HydrometryUploaded byhydrologyproject0
- Planing Hull Seakeeping in Irregular Head SeasUploaded byPierluigiBusetto
- ajme-5-5-2Uploaded byVignesh Kumar
- Corrosion Science 48 (2006) 2363–2379 Carbon-steel Corrosion in Multiphase Slug Flow and CO2Uploaded byjperdigon9634
- Ghassemi+i+in_PMR_2015_2Uploaded byJuniorJavier Olivo Farrera
- MM302 6 Lecture Notes (Dimensional Analysis).pdfUploaded bydragons123x
- 01 Design Guidelines (1)Uploaded byEsvaran Keshev Rao
- UNIT III (1)Uploaded bymech207
- Ship Resistance and PropulsionUploaded byPrince Abanid
- Slender Ship Squat StudyUploaded byjmv
- Air Entrainment Relationship With Water Discharge of Vortex DropUploaded byNathan Vincent
- Estructuras RomanasUploaded byWilliam MontesdeOca
- Estimation of design impact forces of debris flowsUploaded byDproske
- 7 5-04-01-01.2 Analysis of speed power trial data.pdfUploaded byNestor Gómez Rojas
- DrainageDesignManual Chapter09 Culverts (1)Uploaded byRotsapNayrb
- 2011 SolutionsUploaded byNSun
- flood defense systemUploaded byPakHoong Yong
- Bhu Pet 2010 m.tech.Ag.enggUploaded byaglasem
- Open ChannelsUploaded bysamratjgec
- Flow patterns in agitatorUploaded byViren Parwani
- Open Channel Hydraulics by John FentonUploaded bysikarwar22
- Svetlozar Neykov - EMSHIPUploaded byamin
- OpenChannelHB-11-09Uploaded byKunal Goswami
- Basic Pocket GuideUploaded byscience1990
- Semi Planning Boat_Series 65BUploaded byfondexx