You are on page 1of 12

The Theology of Martin Luther CH509

 LESSON 10 of 24

Luther’s Doctrine of the Person of Christ

Dr. Robert A. Kolb, Ph.D.


Experience: Professor of Systematic Theology
at Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, Missouri

For Martin Luther, Jesus Christ stood at the very center of


his theology. We might describe his theology as a theology of
justification by grace through faith, or we might describe his
theology as a theology of the word. We know that he described
his theology as a theology of the two kinds of righteousness or
of the cross. And we have often summarized his theology as a
theology of grace alone, faith alone and Scripture alone. But as
a matter of fact, perhaps the best summary of Luther’s theology
is a theology of Christ alone, though for Luther Christ was never
separable from the other two persons of the Trinity. The charge
of Christomonism (that he focused so much on Christ, he ignored
the Father and the Holy Spirit) is not true, and nonetheless God’s
revelation in Jesus Christ stands at the very heart of his theology.

As a presupposition for looking at his Christology, we must first


remember that he did operate his entire life long with certain
principles of nominalist logic, and these influenced also the way
in which he expressed his understanding of the biblical doctrine of
Christ. According to nominalist logic, terms for concepts may vary
with the nature of the discourse. And so the correct hermeneutical
order for determining meaning is from the subject matter to the
grammar. The subject matter determines the grammar; it is not
the grammar of theological terms that determines the language of
faith. So the subject matter of God’s promise in Christ determines
all, and this sets up the situation in which then paradox is possible
for Luther. So Luther’s entire theology is indeed based upon the
tensions that exist between God’s revelation in Jesus Christ and
the way in which human reason sorts out human life and our
image of the hidden God.

Scholars have suggested that Luther’s doctrine of Christ, which


operates on the basis of this hermeneutical principle that the
subject matter of God’s revelation determines the grammar and
expression of the faith, scholars have noted that there are three
basic traits in Luther’s doctrine of Christ which then determines
this grammar of faith. First of all, Luther comes to the text of
the Gospels and their reports on Jesus of Nazareth with a strong
sense of historical realism. He takes their reports very literally

Transcript - CH509 The Theology of Martin Luther  1 of 12


© 2019 Our Daily Bread University. All rights reserved.
Lesson 10 of 24 Luther’s Doctrine of the Person of Christ

as the expressions or the descriptions of what God is doing as


the Word made flesh. He looks at these reports, however, from
the standpoint of Soteriology, he is always asking the question,
what must a sinner do or receive to become righteous before God?
He is always concerned about the question of salvation. {there is
no SECONDLY }Thirdly, in his understanding of Jesus Christ, he
consistently insists on the uniqueness of the Word made flesh,
Jesus of Nazareth, on the necessity of God’s becoming flesh, and
on the all-sufficiency of God’s gift of salvation in Jesus Christ.

Jesus was unique, God takes the human form in no one else but
this historical figure, this Jew from Nazareth who lived in what we
now call the 1st century, AD. There is one Jesus, one revelation
of God that climaxes all the other words He spoke, and this is
that Word made flesh. Secondly, it is absolutely necessary to
understand that God had to become man to save us. God took
on human flesh in a necessity that we cannot explain. As we
will comment in the next lecture, Luther resists the attempt to
comprehend and nail down and explain completely God’s way of
salvation in Jesus Christ, but he is also convinced this salvation
had to, for some mysterious reason, come through the incarnation
of God. And thirdly, he believes there is no other God but the God
who reveals Himself in Jesus Christ, and all he wants us to know,
all we need to know (not all we want to know, as I have said, but
all we need to know) is there in Jesus Christ.

In the 16th century, German merchants put a kind of sample


on the outside of a package of their wares so that people could
examine it. The most common example would be cloth, if there
was a bale of a certain kind of cloth wrapped up for shipment to
a merchant in another city, the manufacturer of the cloth would
put a small swatch of it on the outside of the package so that the
potential buyer could sample it there and see what the reality of
the whole was like. That was called in German an austput Well
Luther used this analogy for what God has done in Jesus Christ;
He has given us an austput, a sample, a genuine representation of
who He is and what His disposition toward us is. So we see, as a
reflection of the theology of the cross, in Jesus Christ, according
to Luther, we see the nature of God. We see His total love for us,
His unconditional mercy for us.

In looking at the person of Christ, we, of course, are looking at the


doctrine of the Trinity, which we have already touched in Lecture
7. Luther initially did express some reservations about Trinitarian
language, but he never had any reservations about affirming the
divine nature and the human nature of Jesus Christ. Jesus and the
Father are one, Luther confessed, using the Gospel of John and our
Lord’s claim there, “I and the Father are one”. So he recognized

Transcript - CH509 The Theology of Martin Luther  2 of 12


© 2019 Our Daily Bread University. All rights reserved.
Lesson 10 of 24 Luther’s Doctrine of the Person of Christ

always that this human creature was God come in human flesh,
even if at the beginning of his career he wondered aloud as to
whether the language, the dogma of the Trinity was the best
language possible. Soon thereafter he affirmed the traditional
dogmatic expression of the truth that God is in three persons,
that the second person of the holy Trinity was incarnate in Jesus
of Nazareth, he affirmed that and understood it and proclaimed
it without reservation throughout most of his career. He pledged
himself to the ecumenical creeds, and gloried in the Athanasian
Creed as well as the apostles and the Nicene.

His doctrine of the Trinity, and therefore his doctrine of the


person of Christ, was greatly influenced by the expressions of
the church fathers. Luther just worked naturally with the church
fathers, they were his instructors in the writings he read, and he
made great use of new editions of the ancient Christian fathers.
We know that Augustine was his favorite, and although he could
criticize Augustine, he cited Augustine frequently. But Greek
Christology also influenced him a good deal, and he confessed
that Jesus Christ is true God, fully equal in majesty with the
Father and the Holy Spirit. He is as they are creator and preserver;
he is the eternally begotten second person of the holy Trinity.
But in a magnificent fashion, Luther brings together the human
nature and the divine nature of Jesus Christ and in a hymn sung at
Christmas time (written perhaps in 1523 by Luther) we get some
glimpse of the tradition of the fathers as it comes now to poetic
expression. I use the translation of Luther’s Works (the American
edition of Luther writings), from volume 53, pages 240-241. A
somewhat wooden translation at points, we might think, because
it attempts genuinely to express the German original, but to do
so in English rhyme. Luther begins with the praise for Jesus, the
Christ, the Messiah, the human Messiah, who is God come in flesh.

“All praise to thee, O Jesus Christ, that a man on earth thou


liest.

Born of a maiden it is true, and this exalts the heavenly


crew.

Curea elayizon. {-No idea what the correct spelling is or


what it means}

The Father’s only son begotten, in the manger has his cot.

In our poor dying flesh and blood does mask itself the
endless good.

Transcript - CH509 The Theology of Martin Luther  3 of 12


© 2019 Our Daily Bread University. All rights reserved.
Lesson 10 of 24 Luther’s Doctrine of the Person of Christ

Whom all the world could not enwrap, lieth he in Mary’s


lap.

A little child, he now is grown, who everything upholds


alone.

This little child that lay in Mary’s lap, now holds everything
in his hands.

In him the eternal light breaks through (Luther’s


Christology is heavily

influenced by the Gospel of John and John’s epistles as


well), and gives

the world a glory new.

A great light shines amid the night, and makes us children


of the light.”

Here again we see that it is impossible really to discuss the person


of Christ without discussing the work of Christ, but the eternal
light who breaks through in this human creature who was in this
manger in this poor, dying flesh, He makes us children of the light.

“The Father’s son, so God by name, a guest in this world


became.

And leads us from the veil of tears, he in his palace makes


us heirs.

Poor to the earth he cometh thus, pity so to take on us.

And makes us rich in heaven above, and like the angels of


his love.

All this for us did Jesus do, that his great love he might
show.

Let Christendom rejoice therefore, and give him thanks


forevermore.

Curea elayizon.”

In this hymn, we have a reflection of the constant theme of


Luther’s Christology, that mingling of the doctrines of his person

Transcript - CH509 The Theology of Martin Luther  4 of 12


© 2019 Our Daily Bread University. All rights reserved.
Lesson 10 of 24 Luther’s Doctrine of the Person of Christ

and the doctrine of his work. And so Luther viewed Christology


with the same kind of concern that brought Athanasius and then
Augustine and then Anselm to their doctrines of the person of
Christ. It is only and always a matter of salvation.

To use Luther words, if Christ is divested of His deity, there remains


no help against God’s wrath and no rescue of His judgment. God
became a human creature; this human creature is God in human
flesh, so that we may be saved.

Luther used Philippians 2 (the hymn that begins in Philippians


2:3) a great deal as he stressed that Jesus of Nazareth was one
who did not hang onto His Godness, but who obviously was one
who was God and who deserves the worship and the praise and
the obeisance of all human creatures, but this God was obedient
unto death, even the death of the cross.

We will say something a few moments later about Luther’s


adaptation of the ancient doctrine of the communication of
attributes, but it is clear already in what we have noted here that
Luther brings that doctrine of the sharing of the characteristics of
the divine and human nature to a new sharpness and clarity as he
expresses how God and the human creature come together in this
God-Man Jesus of Nazareth.

The contemporary Australian Luther scholar Ian Siggins points


out that the new emphasis in Luther is that God has become flesh
“for me”. He does not concentrate on philosophical questions
about God’s incorruptibility that plagued many theologians
throughout the history of the church, how can we keep God God
as He comes onto this dangerous ground of human flesh? For
Luther, the whole understanding of Christology revolves around
God’s coming among us for us, that “pro me”, “pro nobis” (for
me, for us), that focuses on God’s disposition, His heart, His will,
especially as they relate to me in my fallen condition.

Luther emphasizes that whoever sees Christ sees the Father. We


sometimes say that Luther is simply a Pauline theologian, but
that’s not at all true. The Gospel of John in particular, but the
whole Johannine corpus, shaped Luther’s theology a great deal,
and in Christology we see that quite clearly. Here we encounter,
according to the theology of the cross, God. Here we encounter
the love and the heart of the Father as the Father has sent Jesus
Christ to come to forgive sins. Augustine had said, through the
heart of Christ we go to the heart of God. And Luther repeated
that line many times, not in the sense that we in some mystic
way penetrate into the hidden God, we see in Jesus Christ what
God really thinks of us. And what God thinks of us in Christ is

Transcript - CH509 The Theology of Martin Luther  5 of 12


© 2019 Our Daily Bread University. All rights reserved.
Lesson 10 of 24 Luther’s Doctrine of the Person of Christ

that we are worth so much that He is willing to sacrifice Himself,


He is willing to die for us. So the linkage with God is not in some
mystical union but in simple trust, in the restoration of that
simple trust that informed the relationship between Adam and
Eve and their Creator in [the Garden of] Eden.

Luther said, I know of no other god except the one called


Jesus Christ. It is important to recognize, however, that such
statements are not to be isolated from Luther’s affirmation of a
strong doctrine of the Father and a strong doctrine of the Holy
Spirit. Luther’s doctrine of the Father, as we have already noted,
is particularly present in his doctrine of creation, but it is also
very much there in his understanding of the Father being the one
who sends the Son to reveal His own will. And the Spirit is the
one whom Jesus sends; who indeed proceeds from the Father, but
who then comes with the message of Jesus Christ, to make Jesus
Christ and His benefits present in the lives of those to whom He
comes through the means of grace. Indeed, the means of grace
are a very important part of understanding how Luther believed
Jesus Christ comes to us. They are really the entire method and
means by which, (according to Luther) the Holy Spirit brings us
to faith and connects us then with Christ and with the Father.
Christ is revealed as the Word of God, the Word made flesh, God’s
explanation of His love for us, His expression of His love for us,
and then Christ is revealed through the word of the apostles as it
is recorded in the Scriptures and as it is proclaimed by His people
in the daily life and existence of the church.

This understanding of Jesus Christ is always under threat. The


Christian life is a life of conflict on that battlefield of the human
existence between God and the Devil. And so the most formidable
expression of the Devil’s hatred for God and for His people is
found around the doctrine of Jesus Christ. Luther particularly
emphasized two weapons that the Devil uses to undermine trust
in Jesus as Savior. First of all, he tends to focus our attention only
on the human Christ. And if some would see in Luther a certain
over-emphasis on the divine nature of Christ it may be due to
the fact that Luther thought that it was much more likely that
the Devil would take away our understanding of the divine nature
than of the human nature. For God in human flesh is obviously
tangibly before us in the description of the Bible as a human
being, and so in some ways it is much more difficult to believe in
Him as God in human flesh than it is to believe that He is simply
a human creature.

Though Luther was aware that the Docetists also emphasized the
divine nature in such a way that the human nature was not taken
seriously. And as we have seen in the hymn which we just cited,

Transcript - CH509 The Theology of Martin Luther  6 of 12


© 2019 Our Daily Bread University. All rights reserved.
Lesson 10 of 24 Luther’s Doctrine of the Person of Christ

he lyrically, beautifully expresses the human nature of this baby


in diapers in Mary’s lap, of this corpse that was laid in the tomb,
a human being whose life had departed from Him. Nonetheless,
Luther is particularly concerned that we not focus only on the
human Christ but that we see in this God, laid in [a] crib and
nailed to [the] cross and laid in [a] crypt, the true God.

The second point at which the Devil undermines our belief


in Christ is that he lets us hold a very orthodox, a very biblical
understanding of the person of Christ, but without truly trusting
in Jesus. So Luther stressed again and again how important it is
that we trust in the One who was hanging on the cross for us, but
who reclaimed life for us as He came out of the tomb.

Luther has been criticized, I suppose, more by other Protestants


for his understanding of the communication of attributes than
for any other aspect of his Christology. His opponents accused, at
least his followers if not Luther himself, of having a new dogma
of the Christ. Luther, however, understood his position as quite
biblical and quite necessary in the expressions he chose if one is
really to recapture what the Bible says about Jesus of Nazareth,
the second person of the holy Trinity. His emphasis is neither,
in some ways, on the divine nature or on the human nature,
but on the unity of the one person, Jesus Christ. And because
he believed it so necessary to emphasize this one person and
the unity of the person, he taught that what the ancient church
meant with its doctrine of the communication of attributes was
that the two natures share their characteristics, even though the
natures remain distinct and the characteristics remain distinct.
Luther insisted that the divine characteristics and the human
characteristics are shared by the other natures, but they remain
distinctly the characteristics of one nature or the other. That
means that in the unity of the person, the characteristics are
exercised by both natures but remain the property of one or the
other.

In the incarnation that meant that Jesus continued to possess


all the attributes of God, but He simply did not use them. If
we return to Philippians 2, Luther understood the phrase “he
emptied himself” in a different way than most of the ancient
fathers. They understood the emptying of self as an act by the
preexistent Christ at incarnation. Luther saw it not as a one-time
act which prepared Jesus for incarnation, instead he saw it as an
attitude of the incarnate earthly Jesus. Jesus continued day in and
day out not to reclaim or not to use the powers that He had as
God, His wisdom, His righteousness, His goodness, His freedom.
Instead, He took on the form of a servant and daily He subjected
Himself to all evils, He became impotent for our sake, He took on

Transcript - CH509 The Theology of Martin Luther  7 of 12


© 2019 Our Daily Bread University. All rights reserved.
Lesson 10 of 24 Luther’s Doctrine of the Person of Christ

the sinfulness of our human nature as He went to the cross. So


His assumption of our flesh, His assumption of our humanity was
really the assumption of all human burdens under sin.

For instance, Jesus was poor. It was not the assumed poverty of
the Franciscans, it was not the poverty of choice that was designed
to make the monks of the Middle Ages in Luther’s view look good
in God’s sight, instead He became the poor human creature,
humble, who simply had nothing of His own to offer because He
was there in our place. And He went about His life expressing the
best of human virtues, mercy and love, doing the servants work,
but without any presumption, without any claim to any kind of
human dignity, to say nothing of a claim to divine dignity. He
had the characteristics of Isaiah’s suffering servant (Luther’s
exposition of which we’ll look at in a few moments). Indeed, His
divine power peeks through in the miracles, and Luther saw them,
as had the entire medieval tradition, as proofs of Christ’s divinity.
But they were not particularly important for Luther; he also saw
the proof of Christ’s divinity in the foolishness and impotence
of the cross. God alone would be so foolish and so impotent as
to come to a cross to express His wisdom and His power. And so
while Luther could indeed embrace the medieval view that the
miracles showed the power of God, he also held somewhat of the
opposite opinion.

Luther was particularly good when he was preaching on the


Passion. In his sermons on the Passion, he expressed this belief
that God reveals His love in His foolishness and impotence in
the cross. Luther’s Passion preaching treated the narrative in the
Gospels very, very carefully. Luther was very much interested in
the details of Christ’s suffering, in the way in which He offered
Himself up for sacrifice. Luther stressed Christ’s submission, His
obedience to the Father’s will, as He took on suffering and shame
for our sakes. And he developed that as he nursed the narrative
into the 16th century world. But for him, above all, the use of the
Passion was important, and he took medieval models and really
transformed those medieval models, which often looked at the use
of the Passion as something for us to do to prepare ourselves for
God’s grace, instead Luther used the Passion narrative to impress
upon the believer the gift of Christ’s death and resurrection, and
through that elicited trust and salvation. Luther also used the
example of Christ in these Passion narratives to talk about certain
Christian virtues, but the emphasis was on law and Gospel, upon
looking at our sin through the mirror of Christ’s suffering for it,
and looking at His love through His death and resurrection.

In sorting out who this was then that suffered for us, Luther
emphasized the communication of attributes and its so-called

Transcript - CH509 The Theology of Martin Luther  8 of 12


© 2019 Our Daily Bread University. All rights reserved.
Lesson 10 of 24 Luther’s Doctrine of the Person of Christ

genus majestaticum (that majestic genus), which describes Jesus


as possessing all divine power and all attributes of the divine
nature even as a human creature. But he continually linked
that majestic nature of the person of Christ with the genus
tapeinoticon, God is in human flesh sharing our weakness, our
suffering, our humiliation. So human nature and divine nature
come together, both sets of characteristics are there, but one set
of characteristics is laid aside so that Jesus Christ can assume
everything that we have to suffer (above all, our death) in order
to obtain life.

Luther’s emphasis on the communication of attributes simply


wanted to secure salvation. He was not interested in securing
the sanctity of the divine nature; he believed God could take
care of the sanctity of the divine nature Himself. He wanted so
to link in this person the divine and the human, that there would
be no doubt about the power of God to save us, no doubt about
the assumption of all evils into this divine human man, and His
defeat, His obliteration of all our sin and of our death as He went
to the tomb with sin and death in Him.

Luther used his understanding of the communication of attributes


also in his controversy with Ulrich Zwingli in the argument over
the Lord’s Supper, and we’ll come back to the Christological
elements in it at that point. It is important to note that while
Luther could use the communication of attributes to argue that it
is indeed possible for the human body and blood of Jesus Christ to
be present where God wills it in the Lord’s Supper, but we must note
that his fundamental concern in discussing the communication
of attributes and in teaching this unity of the divine and human
natures that enables the two natures to share their characteristics
fully, that was essentially a pastoral concern. He was concerned
about comforting the troubled consciences of those who needed
to have the power of God for their salvation, but who needed to
have their sins and all their afflictions (especially the affliction of
death) taken from them and placed apart from them in Christ’s
tomb.

One of the many places in which Luther beautifully expresses


his understanding of Christology is in his lectures on Isaiah in
1544AD. A brief set of lectures at the end of his life, but in these
lectures he sums up a good bit of his understanding of the person
of Jesus Christ. So I’d like to take a few moments to summarize
what Luther said in Isaiah 53 about the person of this suffering
servant Jesus of Nazareth who came as God in human flesh to
save sinners.

Luther begins by making certain that we understand that Jesus

Transcript - CH509 The Theology of Martin Luther  9 of 12


© 2019 Our Daily Bread University. All rights reserved.
Lesson 10 of 24 Luther’s Doctrine of the Person of Christ

of Nazareth was, above all, a preacher, a proclaimer of the word.


And yet Luther looks at His message less than His office as the
proclaimer of the word. All of His work is comprehended as God
speaking in Him and God speaking as Him. This proclaimer came
to proclaim not only in His words but also in His whole life and in
His death and in His resurrection that God has come to save.

The suffering servant figure expresses the paradox of the king


as servant and the servant as king. At the end of his life, Luther
is still operating with the theology of the cross. In this paradox,
God the ruler of the world becomes this little baby, the creator of
the world becomes the criminal on the cross, the one who shaped
the heavens and the earth and controls all things is the one who
marches out of the crypt as the risen corpse. In this understanding
of king as servant and servant as king, Luther expresses again
his understanding that all the characteristics of the divine king
are still there in the possession of this lowly human servant,
but this human servant serves rather than exercises His divine
characteristics in glory. But the servant is also the king, and the
king has those characteristics which belong to the servant. And so
even now in the right hand of God, in the councils of the Trinity,
the human nature of Jesus of Nazareth is there mediating and
pleading for human creatures.

In treating Isaiah 53, of course, Luther concentrated on the


suffering of Jesus. He did not date the beginning of Christ’s
suffering to the beginning of holy week; he saw His whole life
as a sacrifice. Jesus came to lay down His entire life in obedience
to His father, in carrying out the will of His father, in living that
life of one who is pleasing to God as the chosen servant of God.
And Luther stressed that Jesus came to lay down His whole life,
to be obedient throughout His whole life, to suffer in this way
as the servant of God, not just for the whores, not just for the
tax collectors, not just for the sinners. Luther emphasized that
He came, above all, for the pious, for those who were like his
understanding of the Pharisees, those who were in his own day
trying to work their way into Heaven through their own good
works. Jesus came to suffer for those who want to be religious, for
those who want to rely on their own religious works. And for them
He assumed all of humanity. Although He did not sin, He assumed
sin, He became sin for us (in Paul’s words in the second letter to
the Corinthians), and He bore it in obedience to His father.

It was important, Luther believed, to stress that He assumed all


of our humanity, He took on our flesh and our blood, and He even
bore on His own back the stripes of our sinfulness, because that
which is not assumed is not dealt with by God. Luther sometimes
used the line of the ancient father Gregory of Nazianzus, “What

Transcript - CH509 The Theology of Martin Luther  10 of 12


© 2019 Our Daily Bread University. All rights reserved.
Lesson 10 of 24 Luther’s Doctrine of the Person of Christ

is not assumed is not saved”. In the Christological context that


means that God has become a complete and total human being
and no part of our humanity was left aside. The ancient heresy of
Apollinarianism, which suggested that part of our humanity was
replaced by the divine Word, was rejected quite clearly by Luther.
In assuming all of our humanity, He also then took our sinfulness
upon Himself and that meant that He also took the result of our
sinfulness, our death, upon Himself.

And Luther did not shy away from saying that God Himself
entered into our death in the second person of the holy Trinity,
he was not a patri-passion, he did not believe that the Father (or
the Holy Spirit for that matter) suffered or died. But in those most
awful of human words, “My God, My God, why have you forsaken
me”, Luther understood that this person (God and man in one
person) died, and so God Himself had entered into our death, into
the worst of our enemies, so that He might kill it. And this was the
heart of Luther’s faith, this was the way that he dealt with God’s
wrath. God dealt with his own wrath by meeting it in death itself,
God took on the worst of our enemies, death itself, with His own
substitutionary death.

And, of course, Luther could not as a biblical theologian leave


it at that. So although we speak of his theology of the cross, a
part of that theology of the cross is the revelation of the love and
power of God in the resurrection of Jesus Christ, for it is the key
to our life. And in the resurrection, the accusation of the Law,
the condemnation of the Law was simply swallowed up because
Jesus brings us out of our baptisms, according to Luther, as new
creatures who have been given new life through the trust that was
the foundation of the relationship between Adam and Eve and
their God already in [the Garden of] Eden.

So what we see in Luther’s understanding of the person of Christ


is that it is really inseparable from His work. The whole key to
Luther’s entire approach to salvation is this bringing together of
divine nature and human nature into a person who can take on
the forces of evil, who can wrestle death to the ground, who can
express in what Luther calls the “Magnificent Duel” everything
that God has done for us. And we will discuss more in the
following lectures just how it is that God has come to terms with
the enemies of the human creature. Christ lives as the God-Man
to all eternity, He lives as the intercessor and Lord that is the one
who is revealed in Isaiah 53, and that is the one whom the human
creature embraces as the Lord of life.

As we then look forward to Luther’s doctrine of justification in the


coming lecture, it is important for us to see that Luther made the

Transcript - CH509 The Theology of Martin Luther  11 of 12


© 2019 Our Daily Bread University. All rights reserved.
Lesson 10 of 24 Luther’s Doctrine of the Person of Christ

transition from person to work of Christ by focusing on the office


of Christ. Luther did not describe the activities of this person in the
traditional medieval schema of which John Calvin employed, the
schema of prophet, priest and king. He did use the designations
“king” and “priest” together, though fairly infrequently. But for
Luther the office of this Jesus of Nazareth was as a preacher. He
was called by God to proclaim the word, He was a pastor, He was a
shepherd, He was Seelsorger (German), He was a curate of souls.
He was one sent by God who would shepherd the sheep of God,
He would find the lost sheep, He would bring them into the flock
of God, He would pick them up and carry them as the sheep (the
children) of God. When Luther used the term prophet, he focused
on Deuteronomy 18 and Jesus’ fulfilling of that prophecy - that
one would come like Moses to be the eschatological prophet, the
one who would proclaim the word of the Lord at the end time. So
Luther saw Jesus’ coming, sent by God to do specifically that task.

This preacher actually then came with, what Luther calls, an


alien work or a strange work, the work of the Law, and with a
proper work, the work of proclaiming the Gospel. Luther’s whole
understanding of Jesus then in His work is indeed summed up in
that conveying of the word of God that condemns sin and sinners
and restores life through the Gospel. Again, that concept of the
word of the Father come in human flesh.

In this office then, Jesus did what he could do only as the one who
was both God and human creature in one person. He brought the
Law to bear on people with the message of, what Luther sometimes
called, his left hand (that word of condemnation) which simply
assesses the sinner who has strayed far from the word of God and
turned his back on the person of God. And then Luther went about
His proper work, the work He delights in, the work of bringing
life and light to human creatures who, again had rejected Him
but whom He has chosen to restore. As He exercised that office
then, Jesus went about playing out His human and His divine
characteristics in this one person in which these characteristics
were shared, in which these characteristics describe the whole of
the God-Man Jesus of Nazareth.

Luther’s theology then centered in Jesus Christ, in His person


and in His work. As we see in the biblical descriptions of Jesus,
Christians have never been able to separate descriptions of His
person and His work, and for Luther too it was impossible to
separate God’s coming in human flesh from the work of pouring
out His blood, laying down His life, claiming it again in the
resurrection so that the straying sheep of God’s flock could be
brought back into the family of God and into the life which they
live serving Him by serving the neighbor.

Transcript - CH509 The Theology of Martin Luther  12 of 12


© 2019 Our Daily Bread University. All rights reserved.

You might also like