Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Science, New Series, Vol. 258, No. 5090. (Dec. 18, 1992), pp. 1927-1930.
Stable URL:
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0036-8075%2819921218%293%3A258%3A5090%3C1927%3AAEACAO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-G
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained
prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in
the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
http://www.jstor.org/journals/aaas.html.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic
journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers,
and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take
advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
http://www.jstor.org
Tue Oct 23 01:46:42 2007
Allometric Engineering: A Causal Analysis of
during any of these censuses were assumed
to have died (1 7). We analyzed patterns of
Natural Selection on Offspring Size
hatchling survival for first-clutch hatchlings
separately from later clutches because
Barry Sinervo, Paul Doughty, Raymond B. Huey, Kelly Zamudio hatchlings from later clutches must have
competed not only with other later clutch
Techniques of offspring size manipulation, "allometric engineering," were used in com- -
hatchlings but also with first clutch hatch-
bination with studies of natural selection to elucidate the causal relation between egg size lings, which were larger by virtue of their
and offspring survival of lizards. The results experimentally validate premises underlying age.
"
theories of optimal egg size: fecundity selection favoring the production of large clutches Lack's first prediction, that selection on
of small eggs was balanced by survival selection favoring large offspring. However, large egg size should be optimizing, was found in
hatchlings did not always have the highest survival, contrary to most theoretical expec- seven of eight cases (Fig. 1, except in first
tations. Optimizing selection on offspring size per se was the most common pattern. clutch Los Bafios 1990). Contrary to theo-
Moreover, matches between average and optimal egg size were qualitative, not quanti- ry, however, optimizing selection did not
tative, perhaps reflecting known functional constraints on the production of large eggs. usually result from a simple interaction
between conflicting directional-selection
components. The fecundity component (me
curve) was invariablv directional and fa-
T h e effect of egg and clutch size on fitness in natural populations of a lizard. vored females that prbduced large clutches
has been a central focus in evolutionary We collected eggs from reproductive of small eggs, whereas the offspring survival
ecology (1) since the work of Lack (2, 3). side-blotched lizards (Utu stansburiunu), a component (1, curve) was strictly direction-
For organisms with extended ~ a r e n t a lcare small iguanid lizard (3 to 10 g) that matures al and favored the largest egg size in only
(for example, birds and mammals), Lack in 1 year, at two localities in the inner two of eight cases [later clutch Los Bafios
predicted that natural selection favors the Coast Range of California, along Del Puer- (LB) and Del Puerto (DP) in 19891. Sur-
clutch (or litter) size that produces the most to Canyon Road (Stanislaus County, Cali- vival selection was significantly optimizing
surviving offspring (2). He tested this hy- fornia) and near Los Bafios Grandes along in three cases (LB first clutch 1989, LB and
pothesis by manipulating clutch size, and Billy Wright Road (Merced County, Cali- DP later clutches 1990), optimizing but
this elegant protocol has become the stan- fornia) (9). Females typically lay small eggs nonsignificant in two cases (DB first clutch
dard in avian studies. For organisms with- (mean of 0.39 g) on the first clutch and 1989 and 1990; however, if data from the 2
out parental care (for example, most am- larger eggs (0.43 g) on later clutches (5, 6, years are pooled, significant optimizing se-
phibians, reptiles, fish, and insects), Lack 10). Lack's hypothesis would be supported lection is detected. P < 0.05). , , and unre-
(3) realized that natural selection should if (i) females that lay intermediate-sized lated to size in one case (LB first clutch in
instead favor a compromise (optimizing se- eggs leave the most surviving offspring (op- 1990; however, see below).
lection) between the quantity and quality timizing selection) ; (ii) the optimum egg The discrepancy between the expected
(size) of offspring. His prediction was based size is small in the first clutch of the season pattern of strictly directional survival selec-
on two premises: (i) egg size is inversely but larger in later clutches; and (iii) the tion that favors large egg size and observed
related to clutch size (egg number), but (ii) observed seasonal shifts in average egg size patterns reflects a complicating effect of
offspring quality and hence offspring surviv- in these clutches coincides with shifts in season and hatchling sex. At LB, for exam-
al is positively related to egg size. Optirniz- the optimum. ple, directional selection consistently fa-
ine" selection results from the conflict be- Optimizing selection can be difficult to vored large female hatchlings (Fig. 2, A
tween fecundity selection (presumably fa- detect because the narrow size range of and 8). Nevertheless, size selection on
voring many small eggs) and survival selec- individuals in natural populations (1 1-1 3) males was comnlex. In three of four cases.
tion (presumably favoring a few large results in a low statistical power. Allometric size selection on males to 1 month of age
eggs). A t evolutionary equilibrium the engineering techniques (4, 5, 8) permitted included a significant optimizing compo-
average egg size should match the opti- us to decrease hatchling size by 1.3 SDs and nent that favored intermediate-sized hatch-
mum. The first premise is usually support- increase hatchling size by 1.6 SDs (14). lings in addition to a significant directional
ed in descriptive studies (4) and experi- Moreover, by experimentally separating size component that favored large hatchlings.
mental tests (5). However, with the ex- from other correlated traits (4, 5, 8), we In the fourth case, size selection was direc-
ception of a few descriptive studies (6, 7), could verify the causal links between size tional but favored small male hatchlines. "
the second premise has not been tested by and fitness (1 1-1 3). The sex of the hatchling is important be-
direct manipulation of offspring size anal- Newborn hatchlings were weighed (g), cause aggression (including cannibalism) by
ogous to manipulations of clutch size. marked, and released (May through Au- adult males, as well as dispersal away from
Therefore, we set out to test the second of gust) within 3 days on the site in small adult male territories, depends on hatchling
Lack's premises. We combined new tech- groups in close proximity to female home sex (16).
niques of offspring size manipulation (4, ranges. A total of 1668 control, miniatur- Lack's hypothesis also predicts that the
5 ) , "allornetric engineering" ( a ) , with a ized, and gigantized hatchlings were re- average egg size should track a seasonal shift
field study of natural selection to deter- leased at the two study sites over two (if one occurs) in the optimal egg size. The
mine the causal relation between egg size -- renroductive seasons (1 ~,4 ) . We recorded prediction always holds qualitatively. Both
and offspring quality as indexed by survival offspring survival to 1 month and to matu- average and optimal egg sizes increased
rity (15). We used a cubic spline algorithm . - 1).
seasonallv in three of four cases (Fig. ,,
B. S i n e ~ oand K. Zamudio, Department of Integrative (12) to determine the shape of the fitness and neither shifted in the remaining case
Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720,
and Department 6 f Zoology NJ-15, university of Wash- function relating offspring survival and off- (DP 1990) (18). Quantitatively, however,
ington,'Seattle WA 9819% spring size. Significance tests for directional average egg size did not shift nearly as much
P. Doughty, Department of Ethology, University of
and optimizing survival selection (16) were (-11% increase) as did optimal egg size
Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 3791 6.
.. . 2
A
0.0 0
-.-.. 02 0
0.4 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 02 0.4 06 08 U)
.-
C
.n
P
0
5 Later clutches Later clutches Later clutches Later clutches *
C
08 6
08 6 03 8
6
06 4 02
04 2 01 02
/ m e x le
02
iL 0 00 0 00 0 00
02 04 06 08 02 04 06 08 02 04 06 08 02 04 06 08
Fig. 1. Each panel plots empirically estimated linear regressions of sions of me x I, versus egg size (product of a linear regression versus a
fecundity (me) on egg mass and cubic splines (12) of survlval probability cubic spline, shaded lines), which provide an estimate of fitness (equal to
(I, for 1 month after release) on egg mass for hatchling llzards from two the number of survlvlng young as a function of egg size). Detection of
localities, for clutches one versus later clutches and for 2 years. In all selection was facllltated by experimentally decreasing (white portion of
cases me curves were significant, negative, and always linear These histogram) and increasing (solid portion of histogram) egg size relative to
relations indicate that fecundity selection was directional and favored natural var~ationin egg size (shaded portion of histogram). Mean egg size
females laying small eggs (22). In contrast, I, curves varied ~nsignifi- for natural variation (solid triangles) and optimum egg size (open trian-
cance and direction, and some curves contained a significant quadratic gles) are indicated. The optlmum egg size is the reproductive strategy
term, indicative of optimizing selection (22). Also plotted are the regres- that leaves the most surviving offspring (21)
size in the first clutch was not as small as the that decreases future reproductive success of month of age appeared to be fairly stable and
optimum egg size, and the average egg size females (19). directional (for example, linear), although
in later clutches was often not as large as Offspring size manipulation has two ad- the relative strength of selection changed on
the optimum. The population at DP, which vantages over correlational studies. Experi- first versus later clutches (Fig. 2A). In this
shifted egg size in 1989 but not in 1990, mental manipulations verify causal links be- instance, the size dependence of survival [P
suggests that seasonal changes in egg size tween egg size and fitness (4, 8, 11-13). coefficient, which measures the intensity of
were facultative. This observation, as well These techniques also facilitate the detec- directional selection (1 ~.6)1 that was measured
as the significant between-year variation in tion of selection (12) by increasing the with both natural and experimentally en-
average egg size observed between 1989 (a representation of large and small individuals hanced variation in hatchling female surviv-
nondrought year) and 1990 (a drought in the population and thus experimentally al (p = 0.180, P < 0.0001) was very similar
year), indicate that egg size showed pro- enhancing the natural variance in offspring to the intensity of selection that was mea-
nounced plasticity (18). size by -54% (Fig. 1). These advantages can sured with the restricted data set comprised
Known functional and physiological be shown by a comparison of results from an of natural variation ( p = 0.196, P < 0.01).
constraints may explain why females do not analysis of selection on offspring size that Thus. the enhanced survival of large " female
primarily track the seasonal shifts in opti- used only natural variation in egg size with hatchlings is causally related to greater ma-
mum egg size. Females with experimentally analvses that used both natural and ex~eri- ternal provisioning and enhanced egg size.
decreased clutch size, and thus with en- menially enhanced variation. The patterns For male hatchlings, analyses based on
larged eggs (as above), often become egg- of natural selection detected with the re- experimentally enhanced variation indicat-
bound or produce eggs that burst at ovipo- stricted sample of natural variation agreed ed that survival was usually the best for
sition (5). A pronounced increase in the with analyses based on natural and experi- intermediate-sized hatchlings: smallest and
probability of such reproductive difficulties mentally enhanced variation in all cases, largest hatchlings typically had lower rates
occurs at egg sizes >0.48 g (9,well below and there were no pathological artifacts aris- of survival at 1 month of age. Using a
many of the later clutch (seasonal) optima ing from our manipulations (20). s a m ~ l erestricted to the natural variation in
detected in our studies. Females that be- The best quantitative comparison using male hatchling size (both populations and
come egg-bound would ultimately die in only the data for natural variation compared years pooled; n = 240), we detected mar-
natural populations, and thus the produc- to the full range of natural and experimen- ginally significant optimizing selection on
tion of excessively large eggs required to tally enhanced variation is provided by se- the first clutch (P = 0.06) that favored
match the optimum egg size on later clutch- lection on female hatchlings. For example, intermediate-sized hatchlings. Thus, the
es would result in a cost of reproduction survival selection on female hatchlings at 1 survival decrement associated with the
0 . 7 2 9 . P < 0 0001) later clutches I , (p = 1.I75, of this protein, which was detected spectro-
Department of Medicine and Department of Molecular
P 4 0.05; y = 0 968, P < 0.061,m,(p = -0.556,
Microbiology, Wash~ngtonUniversity School of Medi- scopically by Keilin in 1925 (19) and char-
P < 0.05);and DP 1989, f~rstc lutch: 1, (p = 0.878,
P > 0 05, NS; y = 1 . 0 2 4 , P > 0.05, NS), me (P
cine, and The Jew~shHospital of St LOUIS,St LOUIS, acterized with respect to oxygen affinity by
MO 63110. Davenport in 1949 (8), has also been a
= -0 544, P 4 0 0001), later clutches I , (P =
0 177, P < 0 Ol), me (p = 0 745, P < 0.001); *To whom correspondence should be addressed mystery. It binds oxygen too tightly to be
SCIENCE ' VOL. 258 18 DECEMBER 1992