Great for aptitude tests.

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

98 views

Great for aptitude tests.

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

- 38429010-ZUPInstructions
- Quantitative Aptitude IBPSGUIDE
- OHAUS Explorer Service Manual
- Numerical Reasoning Formulas
- Math Curriculum Overview Grades 1 8
- Price Hike 21 Percent Nsw 2012:Carbon Tax's supply side push
- Attribute Gauge R&R
- 6th grade math curriculum map
- CHAPTER 3 thesis.docx
- SSC Percentages WB
- unit 3 parent letter
- unit 3 parent letter
- Formulas for Analytical Skil
- lesson plan unit 2 day 4
- Equipments
- Mass
- Lesson Plan Ratio 3
- Excel Final Assignment -3
- mock2
- Ratio q papers.pdf

You are on page 1of 4

their mock scores seriously.” After all, if a student is not performing well in mocks, something must be wrong. The

question really made me ask myself the reasons for my saying so. Is it even correct to say mock scores do not matter. I

think there are several reasons instructors tell students not to take their mock scores seriously. Most important of them

all is motivation. Students are never ready to recognize that scoring well in a test is more a matter of temperament and

question selection than that of content. In fact an average student having the art of question-picking would perform

twice better than a genius student who is out to solve questions in a near about serial order. Therefore, instructors

want to keep their students motivated in order to keep their enthusiasm high. The second reason for not taking mocks

seriously is that the level of preparedness of students at a particular point is different. Many of the institutes start their

mocks by the month of May or June and most students are not ready by then. It is inevitable that they will perform

badly. If the students take it seriously, they would spend rest of their time taking more and more tests to improve

themselves instead of studying and then the real harm would be done. For me, when I entered the CAT preparation, my

verbal didn’t need preparation, my quant took three or four months of tweaking, but my DI took more than a year to

reach a decent level. The level of preparedness for every student is different. So the question is, what do you do with

your mock scores? The better thing to do is to solve your mock paper, if you can solve it on your own, you don’t have a

problem with content. If you cannot, get back to studies. So don’t look hard at your scores, look hard at the paper.

The concept of averages is hardly a new concept at all. If asked, all of you would give me the

following formula for calculating average:

. So far so good. But if I ask all of you to solve a simple problem many of you would reach for

their pens.

The average score of three students A, B, and C is 50. When the score of another student D is

added to the group, the average score become 47. What is the score of student D?

Answer: for most of you, the score of student D would be 4⋅47−3⋅50 = 38.

For me, the calculation would just be 47−9 = 38.

Some of you might have understood what I did. Let me start explaining through a simple

example. Then we shall extend our explorations to more complex problems.

The two images above show two beam balances, one with equal arms and the other with the

arms lengths in the ratio 1: 3. The dotted line in both cases shows the average value.

In the first beam balance, if you move any of the pan one unit towards the average value, the

other pan would also move one unit in the direction of the average value to keep the average

constant. For example, let the weights in the two pans be 50 kg and 60 kg. The average is 55

kg. If you increase the weight in 50 kg pan by one unit (i.e. 51) bringing it nearer to the

average, you will have to decrease the weight in the other pan by one unit (i.e. 59), bringing it

one unit nearer to the average, to keep the average constant.

In the second beam balance, if the arm of length 3 moves 1 unit towards the average, the arm

of length 1 will have to move 3 units towards the average to keep the average constant. For

example, let the weight in pan of 3 unit arm length be 40 kg and the weight in the pan of 1 unit

arm length be 60 kg. Now if I increase the weight in the first pan by 1 unit, I shall have to

decrease the weight in the second pan by 3 units to keep the average constant.

The same rule applies if I am moving a pan away from the average.

Now, understand this- the second beam balance can also be represented with a beam balance

of equal arms but one arm having thrice the weight on the other arm. Savvy? Now let’s see the

problem once again.

The average score of three students A, B, and C is 50. When the score of another student D is

added to the group, the average score become 47. What is the score of student D?

Answer: Now there are three weights on one arm. The average of the four weights is 47. To

move each of the three weight 3 units away from the average (50−47) I shall have to move the

weight D 3⋅3 nine units away from the average. Therefore, weight D = 47−9 = 38.

Four friends have an average weight of 68. If Rahim is also included in the group, the average

weight becomes 72. what is Rahim’s weight?

Answer: Same process: there are four people at a distance of 4 units from the average weight

of 72. To balance them, we will have to place a person at 4⋅4 = 16 units from 72 on the other

side. Therefore, Rahim’s weight = 72 + 16 = 88.

A batsman in his 20thinnings makes a score of 93 and thereby increases his average by 3. What

is the average after 20 innings?

Answer: If you have understood what I have said so far, the new average is nothing but 93−57

= 36. Let the new average be A. Therefore, there are 19 scores at a distance of 3 units from A.

To balance these scores we needone score(which is 93) 19⋅3 = 57 units from A on the other

side. Therefore A = 93−57 = 36.

Now let’s see this funda of ‘balancing act’ applied in a small part of a DI set from CAT 2006. For

more DI sets based on averages, you will have to visit ourCAT CBT Club

Answer: Rather than any long and cumbersome method, we can do this question in a very

short and sweet way- we just see the deviation of each group average from the overall

average. Now the average of PCB group is 98 which is +2 from overall average. Mathematics

group is−1, Social science group is−0.5, Vernacular group is−1. Therefore, total so far = 2−1−

0.5−1 =−0.5. Therefore to have deviation from overall average as 0, the English group average

should have a deviation of +0.5, i.e. the average should be 96.5. Therefore, Dipan’s mark in

paper II in English group are 97.

Let’s have a look at the unbalanced scale in the figure 2 again. The beam balance is shown

below:

If you want to keep the average same while changing weights in both the pans, the weights in

the pan would be inversely proportional to arm lengths, i.e. to increase the weight in the left

pan by one unit, we shall have to increase the weight in the right pan by three units to keep the

average constant. Here, the arm lengths signify the distance of the weights from the average.

Let’s take a simple example:

For example, let’s mix two solutions one with 30% milk and the other with 75% milk. Let it be

given that the mixture is of 50% milk. Now the distances (arm lengths) of both percentages

from the average percentage are 50 – 30 = 20% and 75 – 50 = 25%. Since the arms lengths

are in the ratio 20: 25 = 4: 5, the weights in the pan should be in the ratio 5: 4. Therefore, we

are mixing the solutions in the ratio 5: 4.

In what ratio must the rice at Rs 3.8 per kg be mixed with rice at Rs 4.5 per kg so that the price

of the mixture is Rs 4.2 per kg?

Answer: By now, I believe you know what to do. The distances from the averages are 4.2 – 3.8

= 0.4 and 4.5 – 4.2 = 0.3. the distances are in the ratio 4: 3, therefore, the rice should be

mixed in the ratio 3: 4.

A butler stole one-fourth of a wine bottle containing 60% alcohol and replaced it with water.

Find the resultant concentration of the wine in the bottle.

Answer: Again an easy one with a little twist- now we are mixing three-fourth solution

containing 60% alcohol with one-fourth solution containing 0%. The ratio of the quantities

taken is 3/4 : 1/4 = 3: 1. Therefore, the ratio of the distances from the average would be 1: 3.

Therefore, we Therefore, average value = 60%-

In a wildlife sanctuary, the counting of Zebras and Ostriches is being done. It was found that

there were 150 heads and 480 legs. How many Zebras were there in the sanctuary?

Answer: No mixture here? Yes but there is! Zebra being the milk and Ostriches being the water.

How can you use Alligation here. Simple, you first need to determine of what value we can take

the average. Also, if you see what is the basic difference between a Zebra and an Ostrich that

has been considered in the problem here, you will realize it is the number of legs- Zebra has

four and Ostrich ahs two. And what is the average number of legs per animal given? It is

480/150 = 3.2. The distances from the average are 3.2 – 2 = 1.2 and 4 – 3.2 = 0.8. These

distances are in the ratio 3: 2 or the quantities are in the ratio 2: 3. Therefore, the number of

Zebras = 150⋅3/5 = 90.

Answer: Alligation over here? Yes sir, because we know the average percentage of males and

females, i.e. 50% (number of males and females are equal). Now let’s just consider the

percentage of males in those who said yes and those who said no. The corresponding

percentages are 60% and 20% respectively. Let the ratio of the number of people who said yes

and the number of people who said no be x : y. The ratio of distances of the percentages from

the average percentage is (60 – 50): (50 – 20) = 1: 3⇒x: y = 3 : 1. So let there be 200 people in

all (100 males and 100 females). The ratio of people saying yes to people saying no is 3: 1.

Therefore, number of people saying yes = 200⋅3/4 = 150, out of which females are 40% =

150⋅40/100 = 60 females said yes which is 60% of 100 females.

- 38429010-ZUPInstructionsUploaded byAklchan
- Quantitative Aptitude IBPSGUIDEUploaded byPriyank Bhardwaj
- OHAUS Explorer Service ManualUploaded bysambadee
- Numerical Reasoning FormulasUploaded byRachid HC
- Math Curriculum Overview Grades 1 8Uploaded byGuiselle
- Price Hike 21 Percent Nsw 2012:Carbon Tax's supply side pushUploaded byCarl Cord
- Attribute Gauge R&RUploaded byhel2905
- 6th grade math curriculum mapUploaded byapi-263833433
- CHAPTER 3 thesis.docxUploaded byjolina talledo
- SSC Percentages WBUploaded byChandrasekharVarma
- unit 3 parent letterUploaded byapi-292742040
- unit 3 parent letterUploaded byapi-325172108
- Formulas for Analytical SkilUploaded byNeha Tarun Gupta
- lesson plan unit 2 day 4Uploaded byapi-239155009
- EquipmentsUploaded byShiela Mae Galisa
- MassUploaded byTinie Khamis
- Lesson Plan Ratio 3Uploaded byputri safitri
- Excel Final Assignment -3Uploaded byrajesh nahak
- mock2Uploaded byAjeet Singh Rachhoya
- Ratio q papers.pdfUploaded byPVenkataPuneethh
- The Unfair GameUploaded byLit Jhun Yeang Benjamin
- financial literacy 2 - budgetUploaded byapi-386280166
- percentagepractice1Uploaded byapi-243290578
- Fibonacci Sequence and Golden Ratio in NatureUploaded byasmahai
- lesson plan unit 2 day 4Uploaded byapi-239155009
- 7th grade module 1 lesson 10Uploaded byapi-369302912
- tr_1506Uploaded bybudilia
- BENEFIT.pptxUploaded byDr. Rogelio C. Golez, Jr
- DemoUploaded byNisar Alam
- DCPS School Profile 2011-2012 (French): LeckieUploaded byDC Public Schools

- Excel TricksUploaded byAbhishek Rai
- Guidelines for RC TonesUploaded byAbhishek Rai
- MATH CHEAT SHEETUploaded bySanjeevG
- Coins Questions Pattern - Best examples based on questions in CAT MBA Exam.Uploaded bybilalak1990
- An IntroductionUploaded byAbhishek Rai
- We Indians Are Hypocritcial to Say the LeastUploaded byAbhishek Rai
- As a Man ThinkethUploaded byAbhishek Rai
- Demystifying Dss Digital Signature Standard 1172Uploaded byAbhishek Rai

- Employment Equity GuidelinesUploaded bykimd55
- Percentages - Multipliers SummaryUploaded byMaria Gonzalez
- Property Victoria 2013Uploaded byShahid Khan
- Chicano Manual on How to Handle Gringos by Jose Angel GutierrezUploaded byArte Público Press
- Cost Oriented PricingUploaded byPankaj Kumar
- Exercise 6 cUploaded bysubhi_dugar
- MegaFun Math Skill Builders - Gr 6 to 8.pdfUploaded bywasabi999
- DLL Math 6 Q2 Week 4-3.docxUploaded byAstro
- Quantitative Aptitude Sample Paper 1Uploaded byamir
- Dh St RajasthanUploaded bytarun bansal
- Branch Et Al 2006 Replacing Trip Limits Transferable Quotas (3)Uploaded byÞórarinn Már Kristjánsson
- Sample Pisa ReadingUploaded byTan Teik Soon
- 2 unit plan mathUploaded byapi-316248639
- Teacher spending on school suppliesUploaded by13News Now
- 7. Manage-Working Capital Management of Paper Mills-K MadhaviUploaded byImpact Journals
- soalan matematikUploaded byZairi Razali
- 04 Report Nanded FUploaded bykmhatre_1
- RS1Uploaded byعائشة حرفوش
- The Power of Copy WritingUploaded bytheclass
- Earthwork Cap10hickersonUploaded byJuan Carlos2
- Data interpetationUploaded byVindhya T
- SSRN-id2173546Uploaded byBhuwan
- Chapter 11 - Answers to Concept QuestionsUploaded byMsKhan0078
- Variation in QuantityUploaded byPADMAN
- Data_interpretation.pdfUploaded byShashidhar Hanji
- Solutions for 50 Aptitude Questions on Profit and Loss QuestionsUploaded byNaren Dran
- 2 Sales Budget & ControlUploaded bysanjay.diddee
- New Microsoft Word DocumentUploaded bysherrygeorge
- 6 - Levies (Guide) - Crusader Kings II WikiUploaded byleslewis65
- NIT Form-6.pdfUploaded byGaoudam Natarajan