SPSS ASSIGNMENT

Submitted By: Muhammad Aurangzaib Alam (7531)

1

00 3.0625 59.91106 10.00 FEMALE MALE CISPLATIN VINBLASTIN 5-FLOURO URACIL N 24 24 16 16 16 Descriptive Statistics Dependent Variable:TUMOUR GENDER FEMALE DRUGS CISPLATIN VINBLASTIN 5-FLOURO URACIL Total MALE CISPLATIN VINBLASTIN 5-FLOURO URACIL Total Total CISPLATIN VINBLASTIN 5-FLOURO URACIL Total Mean 60.6875 49.46562 9.1667 Std.07107 6. Deviation 5.78101 15.5000 66.00 2.85715 8.5000 57.00 DRUGS 1.7500 64.54654 7.00 2.98768 12.0000 62.51784 6.5000 60. 2 .04307 N 8 8 8 24 8 8 8 24 16 16 16 48 The above table shows mean values of drugs used in males and females.97614 6.8750 40.3333 63.6250 58.59380 9.Between-Subjects Factors Value Label GENDER 1.25820 12.0000 67.

415 df1 5 df2 42 Sig. . . therefore the overall test is not significant.05. The above table shows that according to Levene¶s test. meaning the over all test indicates that there is no statistically significant difference between effect of all these drugs on tumor size in both males and females.239 Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa Dependent Variable:TUMOUR F 1. the significance level is greater than 0. Design: Intercept + GENDER + DRUGS + GENDER * DRUGS 3 .

646 69.680 10.572 (Adjusted R Squared = .000 .953 .000 168033.333 1228.333 2457.583 168033.000 . . The value of R close to 1 means a strong correlation.646 703.292 1407.750 174850.000 .Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable:TUMOUR Type III Sum of Source Corrected Model Intercept GENDER DRUGS GENDER * DRUGS Error Total Corrected Total Squares 3897.492 .125 Sig.000 6816. R Squared = .521) The above test shows the value of R is 5.333 33.917 a df 5 1 1 2 2 42 48 47 Mean Square 779.667 a.2 which means there is a weak correlation.480 17.494 F 11. 4 .218 2417.333 33.292 2918.

6250 * 6.94733 2.6250 * 8.0980 22.94733 2.000 . The mean difference is significant at the .9375 14.5270 * -8. The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 69.94733 2.494.94733 2.000 .000 .94733 2.Post Hoc Tests DRUGS Multiple Comparisons Dependent Variable:TUMOUR Mean Difference (I) DRUGS Tukey HSD CISPLATIN (J) DRUGS VINBLASTIN 5-FLOURO URACIL VINBLASTIN CISPLATIN 5-FLOURO URACIL 5-FLOURO URACIL CISPLATIN VINBLASTIN Scheffe CISPLATIN VINBLASTIN 5-FLOURO URACIL VINBLASTIN CISPLATIN 5-FLOURO URACIL 5-FLOURO URACIL CISPLATIN VINBLASTIN Based on observed means. *.6250 -14.94733 2.94733 2.000 .951 . 5 .8480 .4645 -.4645 -21.2081 -6. Error 2.946 .946 .951 .2230 21.1669 -23.5419 8.6875* .7855 -8.05 level.4169 23.4169 7.000 .94733 2.1044 Upper Bound 6.6875* -15.1044 -14.2081 -8.5270 -6.1456 The above table shows that effect of 5-fluro uracil is significantly different than both cisplatin and vinblastin on tumor size in males and females.6250 * -7.6875 * 95% Confidence Interval Std.6875 -15.000 Lower Bound -8.9375 15.2230 8.5419 22. (I-J) -.94733 2.0980 7.9375 14.94733 Sig.94733 2.8480 -22.000 . .1669 8.000 .1456 -22.94733 2.9375 15.7855 * -7.

we might have found a corleation.0 of x axis. But because of presence of this value we have a wide spread of data and there is no corealtion. 6 . If this value was not there.Spread-versus-Level Plots The above graph shows that we have an outlier value at point 40.

7 .

The above graph shows that 5-flurouiracil (green line) is effective in decreasing the suize of tumors in males and all three drugs are not effective in females ( blue line). 8 .