Professional Documents
Culture Documents
-Antonio Bernard
? ?
?
?
ORAL SEX
? ?
?
-Antonio Bernard
ORAL SEX is
UNNATURAL
Minnesota statute 609.293 defines
sodomy: “ ‘Sodomy’ means
carnally knowing any person by
the anus or by or with the mouth.”
This law prohibited oral or anal
intercourse between any two
people.
-Antonio Bernard
ORAL SEX is
UNNATURAL
Anal and oral sodomy are unhealthy
and are not normal intercourse.
They disregard human anatomy
and function. The definition of
normal is “that which functions
according to its design.”
Dr. John R. Diggs Jr. (The Health Risks of Gay Sex)
-Antonio Bernard
ORAL SEX is
UNNATURAL
Paglia, PhD, University Professor of Humanities &
Media Studies at the University of the Arts, stated
in her 1994 book titled Vamps and Tramps: New
Essays: “[I]n nature, procreation is the single,
relentless rule. That is the norm. Our sexual
bodies were designed for reproduction. Penis
fits vagina: no fancy linguistic game-playing
can change that biologic fact…”
1994 - Camille Paglia, PhD
-Antonio Bernard
1. Sodomy is unnatural.
-Antonio Bernard
While oral sex will not end up in pregnancy, it is not without its risks.
• Oral herpes
• Genital herpes
• Genital warts (which are caused by HPV)
• Hepatitis A
• Hepatitis B
• Hepatitis C
• HIV/AIDS
• Chlamydia
• Gonorrhea
• Syphilis
• Pubic lice
“Many “safe sex” educators are teaching teens how to make “dental dams” to practice safe oral
sex. This is dangerous advice for teens. The CDC states (2003), “No barrier methods for use
during oral sex have been evaluated as effective by the FDA.” Dental dams are not adequately
protective, and recommending this to teens may put them at risk of acquiring sexually
transmitted diseases in their mouth and throat. Oral sodomy remains a dangerous practice.”
ORAL SEX is
UNNATURAL
Most of the world, for good reason, has
always outlawed acts of sodomy. We should
have paid more attention to an old African
proverb that states, “Don’t tear down a
fence until you know why it was put up.”
“Many “safe sex” educators are teaching teens how to make “dental dams” to practice safe oral
sex. This is dangerous advice for teens. The CDC states (2003), “No barrier methods for use
during oral sex have been evaluated as effective by the FDA.” Dental dams are not adequately
protective, and recommending this to teens may put them at risk of acquiring sexually
transmitted diseases in their mouth and throat. Oral sodomy remains a dangerous practice.”
Lesbians and
ORAL SEX
-Antonio Bernard
“Women can catch STIs such as herpes, genital warts and chlamydia when
exchanging bodily fluids," says Hunt. "Any one-on-one contact, such as oral sex or
using the same hand when touching yourself and then your partner, can put you at
risk. Two women that are both menstruating are at a higher risk, too.”
https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/sexual-health/sexual-health-for-lesbian-and-bisexual-women/
“Lesbians can get the same sexually transmitted infections (STDs) as heterosexual
women. Lesbians can give each other STDs by skin-to-skin contact, mucus membrane
contact, vaginal fluids, and menstrual blood. It is important for sexually active
lesbians to be screened for STDs by a health care provider.”
Author: Katherine A. O'Hanlan, MD, Former President, GLMA, Co-Founder, Lesbian Health Fund, Gynecologist, Portola Valley, CA
Author: Tonia Poteat, MMSc, PA-C, MPH, PhD. Revised May 2012.
Journal of the Infectious
Diseases Society of America.
Sexually Transmitted Infections Among
Women Who Have Sex With Women:
“Women who have sex with women (WSW) are a diverse group with
variations in sexual identity, sexual behaviors, sexual practices, and risk
behaviors. WSW are at risk of acquiring bacterial, viral, and protozoal
sexually transmitted infections (STIs) from current and prior partners, both
male and female. Bacterial vaginosis is common among women in general
and even more so among women with female partners.”
-Linda M. Gorgos Jeanne M. Marrazzo Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 53, Issue suppl_3, 15 December 2011, Pages S84–S91, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir697
“Abuse of Sexual Privileges—Let the husband and wife in their married life prove a help and a
blessing to one another. Let them consider the cost of every indulgence in intemperance and
sensualism. These indulgences do not increase love, nor ennoble and elevate. Those who will
indulge the animal passions and gratify lust will surely stamp upon their offspring the
debasing practices, the grossness of their own physical and moral defilement.”
“The association of masturbation with depression is unlikely to be a result of simply a lack of PVI,
because more masturbation and less PVI make independent contributions to less satisfaction with
relationships, sex life, life in general, and one’s mental health (the multivariate analyses also
examined some partnered sexual activities other than PVI, and revealed that anal and oral sex
frequency also have independent inverse associations with some of the satisfaction indices). It is
likely that only unfettered, real PVI has important mood-enhancing benefits.”
“The findings demonstrate that sexual satisfaction is strongly related to PVI but
not to other sexual behaviors (some of which are significantly inversely related to
sexual satisfaction). A similar pattern applies to satisfaction with relationships, life
in general, and one’s mental health. This evidence contrasts with assertions that
masturbation and other sexual activities are as satisfying as PVI.”
The difference may be due to greater release of prolactin which is associated with
sexual satiety: “the prolactin rise after PVI orgasm is 400% greater than following
masturbation orgasm.” Coitus and other kinds of sexual activity are not equivalent.
“[S]atisfaction with sex life, life in general, sexual partnership, and
mental health correlates directly with frequency of penile-vaginal
intercourse (PVI) and inversely with frequency of both masturbation
and partnered sexual activity excluding PVI (noncoital sex).”
One might be tempted to account for these
psychological differences in satisfaction in terms of
underlying differences in attitude among those who do
them. People with more strict moral codes might feel
guilty in doing noncoital sexual behaviors, and so might
not experience the same psychological benefits that
persons with less strict moral codes would experience.
However, in a study entitled, yes, this is the real full title, “Satisfaction (Sexual,
Life, Relationship, and Mental Health) Is Associated Directly with Penile-Vaginal
Intercourse, but Inversely with Other Sexual Behavior Frequencies,”
Brody and Rui Miguel Costa point out, “The exploratory finding that a rigid attitude
toward variety in sexual activities was completely unrelated to the satisfaction indices
suggests that it is indeed sexual behaviors (and the underlying psychosexual motives
that guide them) that are related to satisfaction, rather than inflexible attitudes.”
In other words, it was not guilt about perceived failure
to adhere to moral norms that undermined satisfaction.
Those without so-called “rigid attitudes” had similar
experiences as those with more traditional attitudes
Brody and Rui found that “[t]he results are consistent with evidence that
specifically PVI frequency, rather than other sexual activities, is associated with
sexual satisfaction, health, and well-being. Inverse associations between
satisfaction and masturbation are not due simply to insufficient PVI.”
In addition to psychological benefits, physiological benefits are also associated with
coitus but not other kinds of sexual behavior. Researchers found that, “specifically
PVI but not other sexual behavior was associated with an important measure of
better homeostasis, better parasympathetic tone, lower mortality risk, and
better psychological function (including better relatedness).”
The research suggests “not only that it is specifically PVI (rather than other sexual behaviors)
that is associated with optimal cardiovascular ‘protection’ from stress, but also that the
benefits are not simply due to having a partner.” Similarly, Brody cites studies showing the
benefits of coitus but not other sexual activities in reducing the likelihood of prostate cancer, breast
cancer, hot flash symptoms, pre-eclampsia, low sperm count, and high blood pressure.
Results
For both sexes, sexual compatibility was
independently predicted by higher frequency of
penile–vaginal intercourse and greater vaginal
orgasm consistency. Women's sexual satisfaction
score was significantly predicted by greater vaginal
orgasm consistency, frequency of partner genital
stimulation, and negatively with masturbation. Men's
sexual satisfaction score was significantly predicted
by greater intercourse frequency and any vaginal
orgasm of their female partners.
Conclusions
The findings suggest that specifically
penile–vaginal intercourse frequency and vaginal
orgasm consistency are associated with indices of
greater intimate relationship adjustment, satisfaction,
and compatibility of both partners, and that women's
masturbation is independently inversely associated
with measures of dyadic and personal function.
Indeed, the evidence suggests that coitus produces health benefits:
“It is specifically PVI (penile–vaginal intercourse) competently performed and
sensitively experienced, that is associated with . . . and produces . . . aspects
of better mental and physical health. This is not the case for other sexual
behaviors (masturbation and anal intercourse are associated with poorer
health indices, effects not attributable simply to lack of PVI).”
What might account for these differences? A number of mechanisms might account for the
differences between coitus and noncoital sexual behavior. For example, Brody writes:
21For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give
thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart
was darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools, 23 and exchanged
the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible
man and of birds and four-footed animals and crawling creatures.
24 Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, so
that their bodies would be dishonored among them. 25 For they exchanged
the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather
than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.
1. Sodomite practices
-Antonio Bernard
“…and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who
practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the
same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice
them.” (Romans 1:32)
26 For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their
women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, 27
and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the
woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men
committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due
penalty of their error. (Romans 1:18-27)
SEX AND DISEASE
“ and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function
of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men
with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own
persons the due penalty of their error.” --(Romans 1:27)
WHY OPPOSE SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS
Same-sex marriage should be opposed because
homosexuality so inverts God’s design it leads to physical,
mental, emotional, relational, and spiritual ruin.
REFERENCES BELOW
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/mc08vpdjz1gzke0/
AAAQ517HZnf5ntn9jVX4dxxua?dl=0
-Antonio Bernard , dindinbernard1@hotmail.com
Part 7