...
11-12 13-14
>
15-16 17-18
19-20 21-22
23-24 25-26
27- 28
29-30
31-32 33-34
35-36 37-38
39-40 41-42
43-44 45-46
47-48 49-51
CATEGORY C
Unidentifiable
At least 49 photos were of poor quality where either stripes were indiscernible or material
insufficient (only whiskers, tail etc) for identification. A photo depicting only the head or the rump
of a tiger may be useful for recording a recapture event if better photos of the animal already exist
in the archive. But such a photo alone cannot be used to identify a unique individual. For example, a
head-only photo cannot be compared for unique identity even if a single unique tiger in the same
data set was captured without its head in the frame.
4
5
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
CATEGORY D
Not above 12 months
Population surveys typically disregard young animals because of their high mortality. The cut-off
age for the tiger estimation is variously described as 12-18 months in these reports. On the
conservative side, we focussed only on photos of tigers that cannot be considered 12-month-old or
older with certainty and those added up to at least 46.
3
4
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39-
40
41
42
43
44
45
46