Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Defendants.
through his attorneys, THOMAS R. WARNICKE and ANDREW A. PATERSON, and for his
Motion to Compel the Taking of Deposition of Defendant Mark Dantonio and Sanctions
STATEMENT OF NON-CONCURRENCE
Plaintiff’s counsel explained the nature of this motion and its legal basis to Defendants’
counsel and requested concurrence, via electronic mail and telephone, but was unable to obtain
concurrence in the relief sought at the time of this filing. (Note: Plaintiff is also filing a separate
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendants Mark Dantonio, Mark Hollis and Lou Anna K. Simon. (Ex. 1, Email to Defendants’
Counsel). Defendant Dantonio, Hollis and Simon’s counsel responded. (Ex. 2, 8/11/2019 Email
from Defendants’ Counsel). Plaintiff’s Counsel informed Defendants’ Counsel that his
Page 1 of 8
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.428 Page 2 of 145
preference was to start with Defendant Dantonio’s deposition, followed by Defendants Hollis
and Simon. Plaintiff’s Counsel then reiterated his request to “get Dantonio scheduled asap and
On August 12, 2019, Plaintiff’s deposition took place. The length of time on the record
Plaintiff’s depositions are attached to provide this Court with the very broad scope and nature of
By way of example and not limitation, Counsel for the Defendant Detectives and Counsel for
Coach Dantonio examined Plaintiff at length regarding: a) Auston Robertson [Dep at 95, 113-
116, 125-130, 133-147, 172-182, 190-199, 250-257, 306-337]; b) Michigan State and Dantonio’s
knowledge and approval of Plaintiff working contemporaneously for Michigan State University
and Sound Mind Sound Body, as well as Coach Dantonio and the MSU football team’s
involvement in Sound Mind Sound Body [Dep at 82-92]; c) the Jones Day Report – including its
shortcomings and failures [Dep at 95, 325-333]; d) Defendant Hollis’ breach of Plaintiff’s
employment agreement with MSU by failing to meet with Plaintiff before suspending him [260,
306-310]; and, e) Defendants’ decision to suspend Plaintiff, in part, due to pressure from the
Larry Nassar matter and to cover their own misdoings [Dep at 215-216].
question Plaintiff about his earlier testimony in an underlying matter, to which Plaintiff’s
Counsel agreed. During a break in Plaintiff’s deposition, Plaintiff’s counsel again reiterated in
writing to Defendants’ counsel his request to get dates from Defendants Dantonio, Hollis and
Simon for depositions. Plaintiff’s Counsel also requested in his email that Defendants Davis and
Page 2 of 8
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.429 Page 3 of 145
Miller’s Counsel provided dates for his clients as well. (Ex. 5, 8/12/2019 Email to Defendants’
counsel).
Plaintiff also requested in the same email dates from Defendants’ counsel Davis and
Miller for their respective depositions. 1 Defendant Dantonio’s counsel responded via email
trying to steer the scheduling away from Defendant Dantonio by stating: [S]ince Paul’s clients
will be easy to schedule, why not start with them.” Defendant Dantonio’s Counsel also requested
a time limitation, stating that the decisions Dantonio made could be covered in three hours. He
also mentioned that Robertson (i.e. Auston Robertson) had nothing to do with this case. (Ex. 6,
On August 15, 2019, Defendant Dantonio’s Counsel informed Plaintiff’s Counsel that it
has come to their attention that Defendant Dantonio may be available on August 20. (Ex. 7,
8/15/2019 Email from Defendant Dantonio’s Counsel). Plaintiff’s counsel responded late that
same day that he would discuss it with his client and respond back the following morning. (Ex. 8,
8/15/2019 Email from Plaintiff’s Counsel). On the morning of August 16, 2019, Plaintiff’s
Counsel informed Defendant Dantonio’s Counsel that he was not available on August 20, 2019
and was unable to open that date up on such short notice. However, Plaintiff’s Counsel informed
Defendant Dantonio’s Counsel that he and Mr. Blackwell were available on six alternative dates,
specifically, August 23, 26, 27 and Sept 3, 4, 6 and requested that Defendant Dantonio’s counsel
advise him which of those dates worked for Defendant Dantonio. (Ex. 8, 8/16/2019 Email from
Plaintiff’s Counsel).
Defendant Dantonio’s Counsel responded that Defendant Dantonio was not available on
any of the six alternate dates provided by Plaintiff’s Counsel. Defendant Dantonio’s Counsel
1
Defendants Davis and Miller’s depositions have been set to take place on September 23 and 24,
2019.
Page 3 of 8
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.430 Page 4 of 145
offered a single date in return – August 21, 2019, which was a date that Defendants’ Counsel
knew Plaintiff’s Counsel was not available, and with a limited time-frame on which Dantonio
would appear from 9:30am-12:30pm. (Ex. 9, 8/16/2019 Email from Defendants’ Counsel).
However, as this Court is aware, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(d)(1), “[u]nless otherwise
On August 19, 2019, Defendant Dantonio’s Counsel sent Plaintiff’s Counsel an email
asking if Plaintiff’ Counsel was proceeding with Dantonio’s deposition on August 21, despite
knowing full well that Plaintiff’s Counsel was not available on that date. (Ex. 10, 8/19/2019
Email from Defendants’ Counsel). Plaintiff’s Counsel promptly responded that he was allowed
7 hours under the Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(d)(1) and requested that Defendants’ Counsel provide a date
on which Defendant Dantonio was available for a full day. (Ex. 11, 8/9/2019 Email from
Plaintiff’s Counsel).
Defendant’s Counsel responded that Coach Dantonio did not have 7 hours available on
any of the dates Plaintiff’s Counsel provided. (Ex. 12, 8/19/2019). Plaintiff’s Counsel responded
that “[T]his shouldn’t be that complicated. Please provide me with date on which Def Dantonio
is available for 7 hours under the FRCP. (Ex. 13, 8/19/2019). Defendant Dantonio’s Counsel
responded with: “Tom, let’s be clear. You will not be deposing any of our witnesses on matters
related to Nasser and Robertson. I’m aware that your client thinks that this is an area that will
concern MSU. But it is not relevant to the question whether coach D, or others, reacted to
Blackwell’s assertion of the 5th Amendment. So any deposition should take a fraction of 7 hours,
After his August 19, 2019 Email, Defendant Dantonio’s Counsel has failed to provide
any dates on which Defendant Dantonio was available for his deposition. Plaintiff’s Counsel
Page 4 of 8
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.431 Page 5 of 145
made another good-faith attempt to get a date locked in for Defendant Dantonio’s deposition.
(Ex. 15, 9/12/2019). Defendant Dantonio’s Counsel responded with more excuses for not
providing dates on which Defendant Dantonio was available for his deposition. (Ex. 16,
9/13/2019). Four additional days have gone by without Defendant Dantonio providing any
available dates. For the time, Defendant Dantonio’s Counsel threatened to file a protective order
There is no basis for Defendant Dantonio’s threatened Protective Order, but such is
merely being thrown out as another attempt to further circumvent Defendant Dantonio’s
obligation to appear for his deposition pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel should be granted.
(1) Scope in General. Unless otherwise limited by court order, the scope of
discovery is as follows: Parties may obtain discovery regarding any
nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party's claim or defense and
proportional to the needs of the case, considering the importance of the issues at
stake in the action, the amount in controversy, the parties’ relative access to
relevant information, the parties’ resources, the importance of the discovery in
resolving the issues, and whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery
outweighs its likely benefit. Information within this scope of discovery need not
be admissible in evidence to be discoverable. (Emphasis supplied).
(1) Timing. A party may not seek discovery from any source before the parties
have conferred as required by Rule 26(f), except in a proceeding exempted from
Page 5 of 8
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.432 Page 6 of 145
(1) Without Leave. A party may, by oral questions, depose any person, including
a party, without leave of court except as provided in Rule 30(a)(2). The
deponent's attendance may be compelled by subpoena under Rule 45. (emphasis
supplied).
By its terms, Rule 26(b)(1) permits discovery of relevant evidence as to “any party’s
claim or defense” regardless of whether or not the evidence is admissible at trial. “Relevant
evidence” is evidence that “has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would
be without the evidence” where “the fact is of consequence in determining the action.” Fed. R.
Evid. 401. As noted, information need not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable. Fed. R.
Civ. P. 26(b)(1). Thus, the scope of Rule 26 is broader than that of the Federal Rules of
Evidence. See Lewis v. ACB Business Services, Inc., 135 F.3d 389, 402 (6th Cir. 1998)(the
“scope of examination permitted under Rule 26(b) is broader than that permitted at trial”); see
also Coleman v. American Red Cross, 23 F.3d 1091, 1097 (6th Cir. 1994)(“A court is not
permitted to preclude the discovery of arguably relevant information solely because, if the
In the case at bar, Plaintiff clearly has the right to depose Defendant Dantonio for a full 7
hours because it is undisputed that Defendant Dantonio has first-hand knowledge and relevant
and relevant information with respect to any defenses the Defendants may raise. (See Transcript
Defendant Dantonio’s deposition is clearly unwarranted in light of the alleged facts properly pled
Page 6 of 8
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.433 Page 7 of 145
in this case that clearly indicate Defendant Dantonio contains relevant information as to all of the
CONCLUSION
WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff prays that this Honorable Court
GRANT his motion to compel Defendant Dantonio to sit for a full 7-hour deposition on October
7, 8, or 9 (or any different date set ordered by this Court) in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.
30(d)(1); order Defendant Dantonio to pay, as sanctions, the attorneys’ fees and costs Plaintiff
incurred for being forced to file and argue this motion; and ordering any such other sanctions as
Page 7 of 8
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.434 Page 8 of 145
I, Thomas R. Warnicke, certify that the concurrence requirement set forth in this
document complies with Local Rule 10, including: 8 ½ x 11 inch paper, double-spaced
(except for quoted materials and footnotes); at least one-inch margins on the top, sides, and
bottom; consecutive page numbering; and type size of all text and footnotes that is no
smaller than 10-1/2 characters per inch (for non-proportional fonts) or 12 point (for
proportional fonts).
I also certify that it is the appropriate length pursuant to Local Rule 7.3(b). There is
a total of 2,091 words in this motion and brief, and the name and version of the word
processing software that was used to generate the word count was Microsoft Office Word
365.
Respectfully submitted,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on September 19, 2019, a copy of the foregoing document and this
proof of service was served via the CM/ECF electronic filing system to all attorneys of record. I
declare under the penalty of perjury that the statement above is true to the best of my information,
Page 8 of 8
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.435 Page 9 of 145
EXHIBIT 1
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.436 Page 10 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.437 Page 11 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.438 Page 12 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.439 Page 13 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.440 Page 14 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.441 Page 15 of 145
EXHIBIT 4
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.442 Page 16 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.443 Page 17 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.444 Page 18 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.445 Page 19 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.446 Page 20 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.447 Page 21 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.448 Page 22 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.449 Page 23 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.450 Page 24 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.451 Page 25 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.452 Page 26 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.453 Page 27 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.454 Page 28 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.455 Page 29 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.456 Page 30 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.457 Page 31 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.458 Page 32 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.459 Page 33 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.460 Page 34 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.461 Page 35 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.462 Page 36 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.463 Page 37 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.464 Page 38 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.465 Page 39 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.466 Page 40 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.467 Page 41 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.468 Page 42 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.469 Page 43 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.470 Page 44 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.471 Page 45 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.472 Page 46 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.473 Page 47 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.474 Page 48 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.475 Page 49 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.476 Page 50 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.477 Page 51 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.478 Page 52 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.479 Page 53 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.480 Page 54 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.481 Page 55 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.482 Page 56 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.483 Page 57 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.484 Page 58 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.485 Page 59 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.486 Page 60 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.487 Page 61 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.488 Page 62 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.489 Page 63 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.490 Page 64 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.491 Page 65 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.492 Page 66 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.493 Page 67 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.494 Page 68 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.495 Page 69 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.496 Page 70 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.497 Page 71 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.498 Page 72 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.499 Page 73 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.500 Page 74 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.501 Page 75 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.502 Page 76 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.503 Page 77 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.504 Page 78 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.505 Page 79 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.506 Page 80 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.507 Page 81 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.508 Page 82 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.509 Page 83 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.510 Page 84 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.511 Page 85 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.512 Page 86 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.513 Page 87 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.514 Page 88 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.515 Page 89 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.516 Page 90 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.517 Page 91 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.518 Page 92 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.519 Page 93 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.520 Page 94 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.521 Page 95 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.522 Page 96 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.523 Page 97 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.524 Page 98 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.525 Page 99 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.526 Page 100 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.527 Page 101 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.528 Page 102 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.529 Page 103 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.530 Page 104 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.531 Page 105 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.532 Page 106 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.533 Page 107 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.534 Page 108 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.535 Page 109 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.536 Page 110 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.537 Page 111 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.538 Page 112 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.539 Page 113 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.540 Page 114 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.541 Page 115 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.542 Page 116 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.543 Page 117 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.544 Page 118 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.545 Page 119 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.546 Page 120 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.547 Page 121 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.548 Page 122 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.549 Page 123 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.550 Page 124 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.551 Page 125 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.552 Page 126 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.553 Page 127 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.554 Page 128 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.555 Page 129 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.556 Page 130 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.557 Page 131 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.558 Page 132 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.559 Page 133 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.560 Page 134 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.561 Page 135 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.562 Page 136 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.563 Page 137 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.564 Page 138 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.565 Page 139 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.566 Page 140 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.567 Page 141 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.568 Page 142 of 145
EXHIBIT 16
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.569 Page 143 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.570 Page 144 of 145
Case 1:18-cv-01261-JTN-ESC ECF No. 58 filed 09/19/19 PageID.571 Page 145 of 145