You are on page 1of 10

elderly people need healthy

mouths
Older Teeth, Gums &
Other Oral Bits z To maintain quality of life
• eating
• talking
Gerodontics
• smiling
z for medical reasons
• prevent infections
• cope with medication side effects

misconceptions
misconceptions
z tooth loss is an inevitable part of the aging process z all older adults get severe gum disease
z most teeth were lost as people became ‘long in the tooth’
because of advancing gum disease z dental decay occurs mainly in children
and was not a problem for the older adult

teeth

hard bits z Complete loss of teeth (edentulism


decreasing in Australia
(edentulism)) is

Tooth loss in Australia


1979 67% of 65+ were edentulous
Teeth
1996 39% of 65+ were edentulous
Bone

z Projections indicate that by 2019 less


25% of 75+ age group will be edentulous
Age changes in the teeth form

z macroscopic changes z wear and attrition


• colour z reduction in enamel
• form • occlusal/incisal
z microscopic changes • interproximal
• the enamel
• dentine
• cementum
• pulp

colour - ‘yellowing’ of teeth

z altered surface structure


z changes in refractory quality of enamel
z changes in quality and quantity of dentine
z change in colour and translucency
z pigmentation of anatomical defects
z corrosion products
z inadequate oral hygiene
z recession exposure of dentine

Problems with hard bits - teeth attrition

z attrition z Loss of enamel and or dentine through


z abrasion occlusal friction
z caries • incisal/occlusal
• coronal • interproximal
• root z Beck and Hunt (1985) found that:
z fracture • 75 % of elderly had at least one tooth with all
incisal or occlusal enamel lost to attrition
• 4% had one tooth worn right down to gingiva
abrasion

z non-occlusal frictional factors


z occurs at neck of tooth
z traumatic tooth brushing and/or gum
disease cause gum recession and
exposes ‘softer’ part of the tooth
z vigorous scrubbing technique combined
with abrasive paste wears abrades tooth

caries

z big problem for the elderly


z 50 - 70 % of dentate have caries
z types:
• coronal
• root

coronal caries root caries

z 60 - 70% of older adults


z mainly of ‘recurrent’ type experience root caries (Holm-
Pederson & Loe 1996)

z mainly molar and z Mandibular molar and


premolar most frequently
premolar teeth involved
z prediction of risk:
z difficult to recognise • coronal caries

unless large •
calculus
plaque
• xerostomia
fracture

z
restored teeth
stress fractured
soft bits
z root remnants
oral mucosa
z sharp edges can cause chronic irritation
of soft tissues gums
tongue
salivary glands

Age changes in oral mucous


The oral mucosa
membranes
z barrier between the external and internal z progressive age related changes in skin - oral
mucosa ?
environments
z reported changes:
z three broad areas • mucosa becomes thin, smooth and dry with age
• masticatory mucosa - gums and hard palate (Bottomly 1979, Kidd & Daly 1982).
• lining mucosa - floor of the mouth, cheeks, • satin like and oedematous appearance with a loss of
elasticity and stippling (Pickett et al 1972).
soft palate & ventral surface of tongue • Becomes more susceptible to minor injury (Miles 1972).
• specialised mucosa - dorsum of the tongue • With age increasing susceptibility to various pathological
and the lips conditions such as candidal infections and decreased
rates of wound healing (Holm-Pederson & Loe,
Southham 1974).

Age changes in oral mucous Age changes in the


membranes periodontium (gums)
z general health influences: z mild to moderate periodontal disease is high in
‘dietary deficiencies of iron and B vitamins the elderly but severe periodontal disease is no
and reduced estrogen levels in women greater than in middle aged
lead to atrophic changes of the mucosa’ z some changes in collagen fibres of periodontal
(Bottomly 1979, Belding & Tade 1978) ligament
z functional adaptation
z however breakdown of the periodontal
attachment is not the result of age related
changes in the periodontium
age changes in the tongue age changes in salivary glands

z decrease in number and sensitivity of z non-medicated older adults do not have


papillae decreased salivary flow rates or altered
salivary composition due to aging (Baum 1986)
z sublingual varicosities are common but
z medications are the most common cause of
not problematic decreased salivary flow and xerostomia in
z nutritional factors may cause atrophic older adults
glossitis - burning sensation z diseases such as Sjogrens syndrome and
radiation therapy and chemotherapy do have
direct effects on the salivary glands (Shay & Ship
1995)

identification of those at risk


Coronal caries

z functionally dependant and frail under z Mainly of ‘recurrent’ type


long term care
z medicated and poly-medicated z Mainly molar and premolar teeth
z disease
z Difficult to recognise unless large

Root Caries Root vs coronal caries


z Dental caries involves the loss of mineral z Unlike enamel caries surface may
ions from the surface apatite crystals appear softened at early stage
that form enamel, dentine and
z Bacterial penetration earlier
cementum
z For root surfaces this process begins z As long as individual has normal salivary
with cementum and sometimes dentine flow root caries progresses slowly
z Both loss of minerals and loss of protein
(proteolysis)
Epidemiology of root caries The caries process
z Examination of ancient skulls shows that Plaque & fermentable
root caries was more prevalent than Sound tooth
carbohydrates Plaque removal
coronal caries tissue Saliva
z Dependent institutionalised people are at Fluoride
higher risk Modified diet
z No epidemiological evidence that root
caries is directly associated with diet/ z In institutionalised individuals all of the factors
above are adverse

Root caries - epidemiology Root caries - location

z Root caries occurs on z Root caries can be


located any where
the root of the teeth
on the root surface
z May spread to the z Disagreement with
coronal portion of the lesions in the CEJ
tooth area
z Advanced root caries • Root to crown or
may track towards pulp • Crown to root?
z Who cares?

Root caries - location What causes gingival recession?

z Root caries most often


z Periodontal disease
occurs supragingivally z Periodontal
z Usually within 2mm of the treatment
CEJ
z Positively associated with z Ironically over
age and gingival zealous brushing
recession/exposed
cementum z In some cases
z Occurs predominately on chronic trauma
the proximal surfaces
followed by the
facial/buccal
Periodontal disease and root
Epidemiology of root caries caries
z Prevalence of root caries is low until z Seichter (1987) review of research suggests
about 60 yrs but then increases that periodontal pathology changes the micro-
z In some developed countries as high as hardness of dentine
70% (Fejerskov & Nyvad 1996) z Root surface response to periodontal
inflamation:
z In developed countries high rates of
restoration and re-restoration (Fure & Zickert • Lysis of cementoblasts
1990) • Changes in the pre-cementum-cementum interface
z Underlying causes are not addressed • Decrease in surface mineralisation
(Kidd et al 2000) • Cemental resorption

Clinical signs Clinical signs


z Early root caries z Much literature describes difficulty in
appears to spread measuring/diagnosing root caries
out along and track
along the CEJ
z Advanced lesions z Variations in signs and symptoms and in
teed to track towards interpretation by clinicians
the pulp

Clinical signs Clinical signs


z Most commonly used clinical signs z Literature fails to correlate root colour
include: with caries activity although most agree
• Visual: it is strongly indicative
• Colour z Cavitation may be present in early
• Contour stages of lesion development
• Cavitation z Blunt probe may be used to determine
• Tactile relative softness of the lesion – be
careful!
Reliability of visual-tactile
diagnosis Why is reliability so difficult
z Root caries diagnosis studies show z Differences in colour interpretation
limited reliability z Disagreement over the tactile
z Good at diagnosing filled cavities but nt interpretations
decayed
z Intra-examiner reliability has been shown
to be better (but not much) than inter-
examiner reliability

radiography Diagnosis of lesion activity


z Can be used for z Kidd et al (2000) provides the following
interproximal lesions criteria:
• Active lesions
• Inactive lesions
• Leathery (intermediate) lesions

Active lesions Inactive lesions


z Close to the gingival margin z Smooth and shiny
z Plaque covered and soft when felt with a blunt z Hard
probe z Not covered with plaque
z May occur with or without cavitation
z Often some distance from the gingival
z Neighbouring lesions may coalesce and margin
eventually encircle tooth
z May or may not be cavitated
z Lesions do not appear to extend apically with
gum recession – rather new lesions develop z Consistency may be more reliable than
colour
Leathery intermediate lesions Managing root caries

z Removal of plaque necessary z Three possible approaches


z Dark leathery consistency
• Nothing
• Arrest
z Virtually without cavitation • Restore

arrest Is arrest possible?


z Fluoride application z De Paola randomised double-blind clinical trial (USA)
z 71 > 65 year olds
z Improved homecare z Root caries rated as:
• C1 – well defined softened area yellowish or light brown but
z Reduction/suppression of microflora without cavitation – could be penetrated by probe
z Changes in diet • C2 – softened area yellowish or light brown with surface
disruption (cavitation)
z Address dry diet • AC –arrested caries with dark colour with leathery
consistency with or without cavitation – little or no
penetration by probe
z Reduce sugary medications
z Anything beyond C2 was excluded

method results
z Both groups examined % of buccal C1s arrested at 4, 8 and 12 months
z Root caries was isolated and dried
Group 4 months 8 months 12 months
z Treatment group got 12,000ppm NaF gel
for two minutes, control received placebo
z Both groups received OHI and Control 18 28 40
instruction on applying brush on gel Treatment 39 95 91
z Both groups received Colgate toothpaste 4 months X2 4.67 p <0.05
and brushes and take-home instructions 8 months X2 22.61 p < 0.001
12 months X2 13.29 p <0.001
results Good results but what are
% of buccal C2s arrested at 4, 8 and 12 months
the limitations of this
study?
Group 4 months 8 months 12 months

Control 0 5 8
Treatment 13 53 57

4 months X2 4.30 p <0.05


8 months X2 22.89 p < 0.001
12 months X2 29.32 p <0.001

Preliminary Caries Diagnosis and


Restore Management of Root Surfaces

z Dental restorations on rots should be


different from coronal
z Restoration surrounded by dentine not
enamel
z Little guidance in texts on restoring root
caries

http://crse-nt.dent.umich.edu/cariology/Chart6.htm

You might also like