AHLUSSUNNAH WAL JAMAAH

Mirza Jhelum , a man

without any Principle
A PROOF THAT MIRZA: JHELUMI: HAS NO
PRINCIPLE
Talat Zahra Naqvi
13-Oct-19

It is proved in this work that Mirza: Jhelumi: is a person who does not have any proper Principle, and his
will rules his system of religion.
Page 1 of 5

Page 1 of 5
 Page 2 of 5

Mirza Jhelumi is a person who does not have a consistent system . Although he claims that he says
nothing but what is in Qur’a:n and ‘Ah:adi:th: but this is just a false claim. What he actually does is that
he distorts the meanings of Texts of ‘Aya:t and Texts of ‘Ah:adi:th: . So he is a person who distorts the
meanings of the Texts of ‘Aya:t of Holy Qur’a:n and Holy ‘Ah:a:di:th: . What does this means? It does
mean that he is a person who is dangerous for the very ‘Isla:m itself.

In this article we are going to discuss some very important contradictions of Mirza: Jhelumi (b:1977CE).

The Problem:-

Mirza: Jhelumi: says that he declares Qa:diani:s [Mah:mu:di: Mirza:’is] as Ca:fir on the basis that they
declare him , his followers and others as Ka:fir.

He did not declared them as Ca:fir on denying the Finality and Lasthood of
Holy Prophet.

Mirza: Jhelumi said that if today Qa:diani:s cease to declare others as C:afir then he shall also cease to
declare them as Ca:fir.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bFRkxlqGWU&t=391s

Mirza: Jhelami: did not say that if Qa:diani:s begin to believe in the Finality
and Lasthood of Holy Prophet , then he shall cease to declare them as
C:afir.

[In the entire lecture referred above ,Mirza: Jhelumi: did not say a single sentence that he declared Mah:mu:di: Mirza:’is [Qadia:nis] as
Ka:fir because the deny the Finality of Holy Prophet, instead he said subsidiary things. Why? The answer is very clear that , he does not
declare them as Ca:fir due to the reason they deny the finality and Lasthood of Holy Prophet , but on the reason that they declare him
and his followers as Ca:fir. But he excluded Jama:’:atul Muslimi:n from it due to the reason he wanted to use them as his supporters on
different issues. They are the only one who agree with him on a number of issues.]

He used the Principle of Ta’li:q Bil Muh:al on the cessation of Tacfi:r by Qa:diani:s and not the cessation of disbelief
of Mah:mudi: Mirza:’is on the Finality and Lasthood of the Prophethood of the Last and Final Prophet Muh:ammad
[PBUH] (B:571 CE-D632 CE).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bFRkxlqGWU&t=391s

Time 5:30 to 7:07

(The total video is of 45:01 mins.)

But he did not declare Jama:’:atul Muslimi:n for the same reason since they also declare all the Muslims
as Ca:fir.

Page 2 of 5
 Page 3 of 5

If Tacfi:r of Muslims is sufficient to make a Tacfi:r of a person who declares all Muslims as Ca:fir then ,
Mirza: Jhelumi: should have declared Jama:’:atul Muslimi:n as Ca:fir.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeaHLlPu2-0

Time 0:15 to 0:23 (mins)

(One may listen to the entire video of 3:46 mins.)

The title of the video is “The Crime (Jurm) of Jama:’:atul Muslimi:n.

This is a proof that Mirza: Jhelumi: does not have a Principle of Tacfi:r and he his principles varies from
lecture to lecture.

(That is why he is declaring Jama:’:atul Muslimi:n not only as Muslim but also as also as ‘Ahlussunnah:-

See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYFYbJiE6EY

Time : 1:45 to 2:13.

The video is made by Abu Yah:ya , a scholar who use to refute Mirza: Jhelumi: , it may be taken as a
Secondary or Supporting Argument. For another supporting argument one may see the video of Ali
Navaz Kh:a:n, a scholar ,who pointed some garlic problems in the system of Mirza: Jhelumi: .S ee:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhBFeCE_1hA

But it may be noted that it is not in the principle arguments but in the supporting arguments. So please
do not get worried if some students of Mirza: Jhelumi: claim that this is a video is made by one of the
rivals of Mirza: Jhelumi: . So please do understand the difference between the Principle Arguments or
Primary Arguments and Supporting Arguments or Secondary Arguments).

The Objection

Mirza: Jhelumi: contradicts himself and this proves that he does not have any consistent system, He is a
variable person in thoughts and keeps on changing his views and principles.

On one hand he declares Mah:mudi: Mirza:’is as Ca:fir not on their disbelief on Finality and Lasthood of
Holy Prophet but on the declaration of Mirza: Jhelumi: , his disciples and all Muslims by them , and
Mirza: Jhelumi: further confirms his position by the Principle of Ta’:li:q Bil Muh:a:l, and on the other
hand he declares Jama:’:atul Muslimi:n as Muslims even though they declare all Muslims as Ca:fir.

Probably because they have some secret connections with Mirza: Jhelumi: .

The only difference which I have found between them is that while Mirza: Jhelumi: is inclined towards
Rafid:ism , Jama:a’:atul Muslimi:n are inclined towards Na:s:bism. Other wise they have a lot of common
factors between them.

Page 3 of 5
 Page 4 of 5

Mirza: Jhelumi: also made a false address when he said that he does not declare Muslims sects like Ahlul
H:adi:th: ,Barailavis and Deobandis {Written in order of Abjad} , since he declares their great scholars as
Ca:fir a, if their schoalrs are not Muslim according to the Mirza: Jhelumi , then how can he declare their
followers as Muslims?

He is just attempting to fool others.

When he needed the support to discourage castrate animals in sacrifice he rejected the principle which
he used to declare Mah:mu:di: Mirza:’is as Ca:fir. This person is with out any principle.

As for us we declare Qadianis and Lahoris [Mah:mudi: Mirza:’is and Laho:ri Mirza:’is] as Non
Muslims (Ca:fir) . Any one who denies the Finality and Lasthood of of Holy Prophet is a Ca:fir. As far as
Lahorites they accept the Cufrs of Mirza: Qa:diasni: and hence are Ca:fir.”

Why Mirza: Qa:diani is Not a Prophet?

We believe that Holy Prophet [571 CE -632 CE] Is the Last and Final Prophet ;
Lasthood and Finality of His Prophethood is Certain and Necessiry.

As Holy Prophet is the Last and Final Prophet no one can become a Prophet after
Him. So Mirza: Qa:diani: cannot be a Prophet. This is the Principle Reason.

But according to Mirza: Jhelumi: ,the principle reason why Mirza: Qadiani: is not a
Prophet is different. In his address to his students Mirza: Jhelumi: says that If
Mirza: Jhelumi: is a Muslim even after disbelieving in Mirza: Qadiani ,( his
predecessor) then Mirza: Qadiani cannot be a Prophet.

In the Entire lecture Mirza: Jhelumi: did not say that Qa:dianis are Ca:fir since they
deny the Lasthood and Finality of the Holy Prophet.

So why he neglected this fact?

This is his conspiracy. On the other hand he claims that Finality and Lasthood of
Holy Prophet can be defended on his platform and lscenery.

A REQUEST TO THE FOLLOWERS OF MIRZA JHELUMI:

Mirza: Jhelumi: is a Heretic , a heretic who claims that he is Not a Heretic, Please
do not accept his claim , but study his claim in the shade of his own lectures and
you shall find that he is a deceptor and a deceiver .

Page 4 of 5
 Page 5 of 5

Some of his disciples argue that one should listen to his entire address. But what
we quote from his lectures are independent of the other parts of his lecture and
are self contained in themselves. So this trick of his disciples does not work.

How many evidences do you require to accept that Mirza: Jhelumi: is an Enemy of
‘Isla:m who is attempting to distort the true teachings of ‘Isla:m in the name of
‘Isla:m. A Great Conspiracy Indeed!
Disclaimer

The author is not responsible for any distortion in meaning due to typing errors.

The Author [Authoress] is ‘Ahlussunnah and follow the Beliefs,Necessaries , Theology, Doctrines and
Dogmas of Creed Of Ahlussunnah. So if some things are found in the works of the Author which go
against the Dogmas , Doctrines, Beliefs, Theologies of Creed of ‘Ahlussunnah then they are for the sake
of arguments.

Page 5 of 5