You are on page 1of 12

STATE OF NEVADA

BEFORE THE NEVADA COMMISSION ON ETHICS

In re Jason Champagne, Member, Ethics Complaint


Nevada State Board of Dental Case No.18-141C
Examiners, State of Nevada, Confidential

Subject. /

ORDER ON JURISDICTION AND INVESTIGATION


Pursuant to NRS 281A.715

The Nevada Commission on Ethics (“Commission”) received an Ethics Complaint


(“Complaint”) on December 6, 2018, regarding Subject Jason Champagne (“Subject”), a
member of the Nevada State Board of Dental Examiners (“Board”). On January 22, 2019,
pursuant to the requirements of the Nevada Ethics in Government Law set forth in NRS
Chapter 281A (“Ethics Law”) and NAC 281A.405, the Commission conducted its
jurisdictional and evidentiary review of the record, including the Ethics Complaint and
supporting evidence, supplemental evidence, and the recommendation of the Executive
Director.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

Although the Subject is a public officer under NRS 281A.160 and the evidence
provided regarding the Subject’s conduct implicates the Ethics Law, the conduct falls
outside of the 2-year statute of limitations period set forth in NRS 281A.280.
Therefore, the Commission lacks jurisdiction to investigate the allegations and
dismisses this Complaint. Nevertheless, the Commission determines it is
appropriate to issue a confidential letter of caution to the Subject regarding
prohibited conduct associated with the use of his official position to secure an
unwarranted advantage for himself or any person to whom he has a commitment in
a private capacity, including a nonprofit organization.

ON BEHALF OF THE NEVADA COMMISSION ON ETHICS

DATED this 22nd day of January, 2019.

/s/ Cheryl A. Lau


Cheryl A. Lau, Esq.
Commission Chair

Order on Jurisdiction and Investigation


Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

I certify that I am an employee of the Nevada Commission on Ethics and that on


this day in Carson City, Nevada, I deposited for mailing, via U.S. Postal Service, certified
mail, return receipt requested, through the State of Nevada mailroom, a true and correct
copy of the foregoing Order on Jurisdiction and Investigation, addressed as follows:

Jason Champagne Cert. Mail No.: 9171 9690 0935 0037 6376 96
Board Member
Board of Dental Examiners
State of Nevada
6010 S. Rainbow Blvd., Suite A-1
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118

Dated: January 22, 2019


Employee, Nevada Commission on Ethics

Order on Jurisdiction and Investigation


Page 2 of 2
STATE OF NEVADA

BEFORE THE NEVADA COMMISSION ON ETHICS

In re Gregory Pisani, Member, Ethics Complaint


Nevada State Board of Dental Case No.18-143C
Examiners, State of Nevada, Confidential

Subject. /

ORDER ON JURISDICTION AND INVESTIGATION


Pursuant to NRS 281A.715

The Nevada Commission on Ethics (“Commission”) received an Ethics Complaint


(“Complaint”) on December 6, 2018, regarding Subject Gregory Pisani (“Subject”), a
member of the Nevada State Board of Dental Examiners (“Board”). On January 22, 2019,
pursuant to the requirements of the Nevada Ethics in Government Law set forth in NRS
Chapter 281A (“Ethics Law”) and NAC 281A.405, the Commission conducted its
jurisdictional and evidentiary review of the record, including the Ethics Complaint and
supporting evidence, supplemental evidence, and the recommendation of the Executive
Director.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

Although the Subject is a public officer under NRS 281A.160 and the evidence
provided regarding the Subject’s conduct implicates the Ethics Law, the conduct falls
outside of the 2-year statute of limitations period set forth in NRS 281A.280.
Therefore, the Commission lacks jurisdiction to investigate the allegations and
dismisses this Complaint. Nevertheless, the Commission determines it is
appropriate to issue a confidential letter of caution to the Subject regarding
prohibited conduct associated with the use of his official position to secure an
unwarranted advantage for himself or any person to whom he has a commitment in
a private capacity, including a nonprofit organization.

ON BEHALF OF THE NEVADA COMMISSION ON ETHICS

DATED this 22nd day of January, 2019.

/s/ Cheryl A. Lau


Cheryl A. Lau, Esq.
Commission Chair

Order on Jurisdiction and Investigation


Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

I certify that I am an employee of the Nevada Commission on Ethics and that on


this day in Carson City, Nevada, I deposited for mailing, via U.S. Postal Service, certified
mail, return receipt requested, through the State of Nevada mailroom, a true and correct
copy of the foregoing Order on Jurisdiction and Investigation, addressed as follows:

Gregory Pisani Cert. Mail No.: 9171 9690 0935 0037 6377 40
Board Member
Board of Dental Examiners
State of Nevada
6010 S. Rainbow Blvd., Suite A-1
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118

Dated: January 22, 2019


Employee, Nevada Commission on Ethics

Order on Jurisdiction and Investigation


Page 2 of 2
STATE OF NEVADA

BEFORE THE NEVADA COMMISSION ON ETHICS

In re Jason Champagne, Member, Ethics Complaint


Nevada State Board of Dental Case No.18-141C
Examiners, State of Nevada, Confidential

Subject. /

AMENDED ORDER ON JURISDICTION AND INVESTIGATION


Pursuant to NRS 281A.715

The Nevada Commission on Ethics (“Commission”) received an Ethics Complaint


(“Complaint”) on December 6, 2018, regarding Subject Jason Champagne (“Subject”), a
member of the Nevada State Board of Dental Examiners (“Board”). On January 22, 2019,
pursuant to the requirements of the Nevada Ethics in Government Law set forth in NRS
Chapter 281A (“Ethics Law”) and NAC 281A.405, the Commission conducted its
jurisdictional and evidentiary review of the record, including the Ethics Complaint and
supporting evidence, supplemental evidence, and the recommendation of the Executive
Director.

On January 22, 2019, the Commission issued an Order on Jurisdiction and


Investigation concluding that the Commission lacked jurisdiction to investigate the
allegations due to the expiration of the statute of limitations, and the Commission
dismissed the Complaint. The Commission further determined it was appropriate to issue
a confidential letter of caution to the Subject regarding prohibited conduct associated with
the use of his official position to secure an unwarranted advantages for himself or any
person to whom he has a commitment in a private capacity, including a nonprofit
organization.

Given the lack of jurisdiction in the matter, the Commission hereby issues this
Amended Order on Jurisdiction and Investigation retracting its letter of caution.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ON BEHALF OF THE NEVADA COMMISSION ON ETHICS

DATED this 17th day of July, 2019.

/s/ Cheryl A. Lau


Cheryl A. Lau, Esq.
Commission Chair

Amended Order on Jurisdiction and Investigation


Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

I certify that I am an employee of the Nevada Commission on Ethics and that on


this day in Carson City, Nevada, I transmitted via email, a true and correct copy of the
foregoing Amended Order on Jurisdiction and Investigation, addressed as follows:

Jason Champagne
Board Member
c/o Melanie Bernstein Chapman
General Counsel
Nevada State Board of Dental Examiners
mbchapman@nsbde.nv.gov

Dated: July 17, 2019


Employee, Nevada Commission on Ethics

Amended Order on Jurisdiction and Investigation


Page 2 of 2
STATE OF NEVADA

BEFORE THE NEVADA COMMISSION ON ETHICS

In re Gregory Pisani, Member, Ethics Complaint


Nevada State Board of Dental Case No.18-143C
Examiners, State of Nevada, Confidential

Subject. /

AMENDED ORDER ON JURISDICTION AND INVESTIGATION


Pursuant to NRS 281A.715

The Nevada Commission on Ethics (“Commission”) received an Ethics Complaint


(“Complaint”) on December 6, 2018, regarding Subject Gregory Pisani (“Subject”), a
member of the Nevada State Board of Dental Examiners (“Board”). On January 22, 2019,
pursuant to the requirements of the Nevada Ethics in Government Law set forth in NRS
Chapter 281A (“Ethics Law”) and NAC 281A.405, the Commission conducted its
jurisdictional and evidentiary review of the record, including the Ethics Complaint and
supporting evidence, supplemental evidence, and the recommendation of the Executive
Director.

On January 22, 2019, the Commission issued an Order on Jurisdiction and


Investigation concluding that the Commission lacked jurisdiction to investigate the
allegations due to the expiration of the statute of limitations, and the Commission
dismissed the Complaint. The Commission further determined it was appropriate to issue
a confidential letter of caution to the Subject regarding prohibited conduct associated with
the use of his official position to secure an unwarranted advantages for himself or any
person to whom he has a commitment in a private capacity, including a nonprofit
organization.

Given the lack of jurisdiction in the matter, the Commission hereby issues this
Amended Order on Jurisdiction and Investigation retracting its letter of caution.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ON BEHALF OF THE NEVADA COMMISSION ON ETHICS

DATED this 17th day of July, 2019.

/s/ Cheryl A. Lau


Cheryl A. Lau, Esq.
Commission Chair

Amended Order on Jurisdiction and Investigation


Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

I certify that I am an employee of the Nevada Commission on Ethics and that on


this day in Carson City, Nevada, I transmitted via email, a true and correct copy of the
foregoing Amended Order on Jurisdiction and Investigation, addressed as follows:

Gregory Pisani
Board Member
c/o Melanie Bernstein Chapman
General Counsel
Nevada State Board of Dental Examiners
mbchapman@nsbde.nv.gov

Dated: July 17, 2019


Employee, Nevada Commission on Ethics

Amended Order on Jurisdiction and Investigation


Page 2 of 2

You might also like