Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Product design defines the appearance of the product, sets standards for performance, specifies which
materials are to be used, and determines dimensions and tolerances. Design may be an art, but the design
process must be managed effectively. An effective design process are:
Matches product or service characteristics with customer requirements.
Ensure that customer requirements are met in the simplest and least costly manner.
Reduces the time required to design a new product or service.
Minimizes the revisions necessary to make a design workable.
Product development translates the needs of customers given by marketing into technical specifications
and designing the various features into the product to meet the product specifications. Manufacturing has
the responsibility of selecting the process by which the product can be manufactured. Product design and
development provides a link between marketing, customer needs and expectations and the activities
required to manufacture the product. The manufacturing process should be able to meet the local
preferences in a global market place.
The essence of any organization is the product or service it offers. There is an obvious link between
product design and the success of the organization. Those organizations which have well-designed
products are more likely to realize their goals than those with poorly designed products. Hence
organizations have a vital stake in achieving good product design.
Product design is concerned with the designing of three issues as form, process and function of a
production.
1. Form Design
It is concerned with the appearance, and aesthetic considerations and also the size, volume and
weight of the product which are secondary to the performance of the product.
2. Process Design
It is concerned with the overall sequences of operations required to achieve the design specifications
of the product. It specifies the type of work stations that are to be used, the machines and
equipments necessary to carry out the processes to produce the product.
3. Function Design
It is concerned with the first and foremost requirement of a good product i.e., the product should
effectively perform the function for which it is developed. For example, for a television set, the
picture quality and the sound quality is more important than the appearance of the cabinet in which
the picture tube is fixed. (Joshi, P.R., Fago., G. and Aryal, L.P., 2012)
Maturity stage
Sales Revenue
Sales
Start up Rapid Decline
Growth stage Rapid Revenue curve
stage Growth
Time
Mass Customization
Companies like standardization because it enables them to produce high volumes of relatively low-cost
products, albeit products with little variety. Customers, on the other hand, typically prefer more variety,
although they like the low cost. The question for producers is how to resolve these issues without (1)
losing the benefits of standardization and (2) incurring a host of problems that are often linked to
variety. These include increasing the resources needed to achieve design variety; increasing variety in
the production process, which would add to the skills necessary to produce products, causing a
decrease in productivity; creating an additional inventory burden during and after production, by
having to carry replacement parts for the increased variety of parts; and adding to the difficulty of
diagnosing and repairing product failures. The answer, at least for some companies, is mass
customization, a strategy of producing standardized goods or services, but incorporating some degree
of customization in the final product or services. Several tactics make this possible. One is delayed
differentiation, and another is modular design.
Reliability
Reliability is a measure of the ability of a product, part or system to perform its intended function
under a prescribed set of conditions. It is the probability that an item will function as planned over a
given time period. Reliability is always specified with respect to normal operating conditions which
are taken into considerations while designing the product for reliability. Reliability of a product can
be improved by improving the reliability of the components used in the product, by reducing the
number of components used and using backups in case certain components fail in operation.
The importance of reliability is underscored by its use by prospective buyers in comparing
alternatives and by sellers as one determinant of price. Reliability also can have an impact on repeat
sales, reflect on the product’s image, and, if it is too low, create legal implications.
Potential Ways to Improve Reliability
1. Improve component design.
2. Improve production and/or assembly techniques.
3. Improve testing.
4. Use backups.
5. Improve preventive maintenance procedures.
6. Improve user education.
7. Improve system design.
A fundamental question concerning improving reliability is: How much reliability is needed?
Obviously, the reliability needed for a household light bulb isn’t in the same category as the reliability
needed for an airplane. So the answer to the question depends on the potential benefits of
improvements and on the cost of those improvements. Generally speaking, reliability improvements
become increasingly costly. Thus, although benefits initially may increase at a much faster rate than
costs, the opposite eventually becomes true. The optimal level of reliability is the point where the
incremental benefits received equals the incremental cost of obtaining it. In the short term, this trade-
off is made in the context of relatively fixed parameters (e.g., costs). However, in the longer term,
efforts to improve reliability and reduce costs can lead to higher optimal levels of reliability.
Modular Design
Modular design is a form of standardization. Modules represent groupings of component parts into
subassemblies, usually to the point where the individual parts lose their separate identity. One
familiar example of modular design is computers, which have modular parts that can be replaced if
they become defective. By arranging modules in different configurations, different computer
capabilities can be obtained. It is the creation of products from some combination of basic, pre-
existing subsystems known as modules. In this approach, products are designed in easily segmented
components or modules. This design offers flexibility to both production (manufacture and assembly)
and marketing. The modular design concept gives consumers a range of product options and offers
considerable advantages in manufacturing and product design.
One advantage of modular design of equipment compared with non-modular design is that failures
are often easier to diagnose and remedy because there are fewer pieces to investigate. Similar
advantages are found in ease of repair and replacement; the faulty module is conveniently removed
and replaced with a good one. The manufacture and assembly of modules generally involve
simplifications: fewer parts involved, so purchasing and inventory control become more routine,
fabrication and assembly operations become more standardized, and training costs often are
relatively low.
1. Need Identification
The design process begins with understanding the customer and actively identifying customer needs.
Ideas for new products or improvements to existing products can be generated from many sources,
including a company's own R & D department, customer complaints or suggestions, marketing research,
suppliers, and salespersons in the field, factory workers, and new technological developments.
Competitors are also a source of ideas for new products or services. Pure research and applied research is
also used for identification of customer needs.
2. Feasibility Study /Product Planning
The feasibility study includes several types of analyses, beginning with a market analysis. The market
analysis assesses whether there's enough demand for the proposed product to invest in developing it
further. If the demand potential exists, then there's an economic analysis that looks at estimate of
production and development costs and compares them to estimated sales volume. Finally, there are
technical and strategic analyses that answer such questions as:
Does the new product require new technology?
Is the risk or capital investment excessive?
Does the company have sufficient labour and management skills to support the required technology?
Is sufficient capacity available for production?
Does the new product provide a competitive advantage for the company?
Does it draw on corporate strengths?
Is it compatible with the core business of the firm?
Performance specifications are written for product concepts that pass the feasibility study and are
approved for development. They describe the function of the product-that is, what the product should do
to satisfy customer needs (Russell & Taylor, 2009).
3. Advance Design
Basic and applied researchers investigate technical feasibility and identify in greater detail the tradeoffs in
product design. Promising design alternatives are evaluated according to critical parameters to determine
whether design support such as analytical testing, experimentation, physical modeling, and prototype
testing will be required (Everett, E. et al 1992).
Rapid prototyping creates preliminary design models that are quickly tested and either discarded or
further refined. Designers take general performance specifications and translate them into a physical
product or service with technical design specifications. The process involves building a prototype,
testing the prototype, revising the design, retesting, until a viable design is determined. It involves
form, functional and production design.
Form Design: Form design refers to the physical appearance of a product - its shape, colour, size, and
style. Aesthetics such as image, market appeal, and personal identification are also part of form design.
Functional Design: Functional design is concerned with how the product performs. It seeks to meet the
performance specifications of fitness for use by the customer.
Production Design: Production design is concerned with how the product will be made. During the
design stage itself the manufacturing aspects should be considered.
4. Detailed Engineering Design
In this stage, a series of engineering activities to develop a detailed definition of the product, including its
subsystems and components, materials, sizes, shapes, and so on. Design engineers now design the
components that will constitute the product so that it has the required features and gives the desired
benefits. Technical expertise of the company comes to the fore during this stage of the product
development process.
In this stage, operations managers should provide design engineers with information about the
producibility of the components being designed. Operations managers should be included in decisions
about equipment design, since they know more about equipment than do design engineers. If the product
requires a new material that has special properties, materials managers and suppliers should be
consulted. Design engineers must be keenly aware that the product must be designed for followings:
a. Design for Functionality: The product should serve the customer needs for which it is being designed.
b. Design for Reliability: The product should function adequately over a defined period of time.
c. Design for Maintainability: Maintenance processes should not be cumbersome, time consuming, and
expensive.
d. Design for Producibility: The product should be easy to manufacture.
5. Production Process Design and Development
Working with the detailed product design, engineers and manufacturing specialists prepare plans for
materials acquisitions, production, warehousing, transportation, and distribution. Activities here,
however, go beyond just hardware considerations: This stage involves planning, too, for production and
control systems, computer information systems, and human resource systems (Everette E., et. al. 1992).
6. Product Evaluation and Improvement
Customers’ feedback is tracked, and failure data are analyzed. Formal research is conducted to
understand customers’ experience of the product. The company keeps itself updated on product’s
underlying technologies and process technologies. Product is redesigned if customer’s feedback is
persistently negative or if new technological breakthroughs enable design and production of a better
product.
In other words, most products are continually reevaluated for improvement possibilities throughout their
lives. Field performance and failure data, technical breakthroughs in materials and equipment, and formal
research al are used to monitor, analyze, and redesign the product.
7. Product Use and Support
Customers are trained to use the product. It is important that customers use all the feature of the product
and get all the benefits that the product is capable of providing. Customers will not rate the product
highly if they do no use all the benefits that the product is capable of providing. For example, less tech-
savvy customers use their smarts phones just to make calls and send messages.
Similarly, an important stage of product development considers support for the consumer who uses the
product. Support systems might
Educate users on specific application of the product.
Provide warranty and repair service,
Distribute replacement parts or
Upgrade the product with design improvements.
Inputs:
Patients Transformation or Conversion Process
Nurses Outputs:
Doctors History Medical Exam Tests Prescription Cared
Test Equipments Patient
Drugs
Two key issues in service design are the degree of variation in service requirements and the degree of
customer contact and customer involvement in the delivery system. These have an impact on the degree to
which service can be standardized or must be customized. The lower the degree of customer contact and
service requirement variability, the more standardized the service can be. Service design with no contact
and little or no processing variability is very much like product design. Conversely, high variability and
high customer contact generally mean the service must be highly customized. A related consideration in
service design is the opportunity for selling: The greater the degree of customer contact, the greater the
opportunities for selling.
An effective and efficient manager must try to identify optimum size of the service in a competitive
situation for his/her organization; otherwise organization may lose valuable customers. The concept of
optimum size of the service can be illustrated with the help of following figure:
Figure: Optimum Size of the Service in a Competitive Market
Optimum
BALANCED SIZE OF SERVICE
Size of the
Service
If Low Quality Possibility in
Low Cost of Low Charge for
Service is Losing
Service Service
Designed, Customers
Differences between Product and Service Design
Service operations managers must contend with issues that may be insignificant or nonexistent for
managers in a production setting. These include the following:
1. Products are generally tangible; services are generally intangible. Consequently, service design often
focuses more on intangible factors (e.g., peace of mind, ambiance) than does product design.
2. In many instances services are created and delivered at the same time (e.g., a haircut, a car wash). In such
instances there is less latitude in finding and correcting errors before the customer has chance to discover
them. Consequently, training, process design, and customer relations are particularly important.
3. Services cannot be inventoried. This poses restriction on flexibility and makes capacity issues very
important.
4. Services are highly visible to consumers and must be designed with that in mind; this adds an extra
dimension to process design, one that usually is not present in product design.
5. Some services have low barriers to entry and exit. This places additional pressures on service design to be
innovative and cost-effective.
6. Location is often important to service design, with convenience as a major factor. Hence, design of
services and choice of location are often closely linked.
7. Service systems range from those with little or no customer contact to those that have a very high degree
of customer contact. Here are some examples of those different types:
a. Insulated technical core; little or no customer contact (e.g., software development).
b. Production line; little or no customer contact (e.g., automatic car wash).
c. Personalized service (e.g., haircut, medical service).
d. Consumer participation (e.g., diet program, dance lessons).
e. Self-service (e.g., supermarket).
f. If there is little or no customer contact, service system design is like product system design.
8. Demand variability alternately creates waiting lines or idle service resources.
Unit 3 Capacity Planning
Capacity refers to an upper limit or ceiling on the load that an operating unit can handle. The load might
be in terms of the number of physical units produced (e.g., bicycles assembled per hour) or the number of
services performed (e.g., computer upgraded per hour). The operating unit might be a plant, department,
machine, store, or worker. Capacity needs include equipment, space, and employee skills.
Some basic questions in capacity planning are the following:
1. What kind of capacity is needed?
2. How much is needed?
3. When is it needed?
The question of what kind of capacity is needed depends on the products and services that management
intends to produce or provide. Hence, in a very real sense, capacity planning is governed by those choices.
Forecast are key inputs used to answer the questions of how much capacity is needed and when is needed.
Capacity planning is a long-term strategic decision (also referred to as strategic capacity planning) that
establishes a firm’s overall level of resources. Capacity may be defined as the amount of resource inputs
available relative to output requirements over particular period of time.
The objective of strategic capacity planning is to provide an approach for determining the overall level of
capital intensive resources-facilities, machinery, equipment and overall size of labour force-that best
support the firm’s long-range competitive strategy. The level of capacity selected has a critical impact on
the firm’s ability to respond to customer demand (i.e., response rate), its cost structure, its inventory
policies and its management and staff support requirements. Capacity decisions affect product lead time,
customer responsiveness, operating costs and a firm’s ability to compete. Inadequate capacity can result in
loss of customers and limited growth. On the other hand excess capacity can result in under utilization of
machines, equipment and labour, excess inventory, higher costs and lesser profits.
The goal of capacity planning is to achieve a match between the long-term supply capabilities of an
organization and the predicted level of long-term demand. Organizations become involved in capacity
planning for various reasons. Among the chief reasons are changes in demand, changes in technology,
changes in the environment, and perceived threats or opportunities. A gap between current and desired
capacity will result in capacity that is out of balance. Overcapacity causes operating costs that are too high,
while under-capacity causes strained resources and possible loss of customers.
Capacity often refers to an upper limit on the rate of output. Even though this seems simple enough, there
are subtle difficulties in actually measuring capacity in certain cases. These difficulties arise because of
different interpretations of the term capacity and problems with identifying suitable measures for a
specific situation.
In manufacturing oriented organization, capacity can be expressed on the basis of output whereas in
service oriented organization, capacity can be expressed on the basis of input. It is simple to measure
capacity while there are similar natures of products. When diverse natures of products are produced
capacity measurement becomes complex.
In selecting a measure of capacity, it is important to choose one that does not require updating. No single
measure of capacity will be appropriate in every situation. Rather, the measure of capacity must be
tailored to the situation. Table below provides some examples of commonly used measures of capacity.
Table Capacity Measurement in Different Organizations
Types of organization On the basis of output Capacity measures
Steel producer Tons of steel/shift
Automobile manufacturer Number of autos
Brewery Barrels of beer
Cannery Tons of food
Power company Megawatts of electricity
Sugar factory Tons of sugar/shift
Oil refineries Gallons of oil refined/day
On the basis of input
Hospital Number of beds
Tax office Number of accountants
Warehouse Square/cubic feet of storage space
Job shop Number of labour or machine hours
Airlines Number of seats
Movie theater Number of seats
Restaurant Number of seats or tables
University Number of students and or faculty
Merchandising Square feet of display or sales area
Source: Taken and restructured from Stevenson, W. J. (2009). “Operations Management”
However, capacity can be measured in different ways and has different meaning to different people at
different level of management. The top level of management is concerned with aggregate capacity of all
plants of the firm and financial resources required supporting these plants. Plant manager is concerned
with planning of capacity of individual plant under his control. The capacity planning is the process of
determining the capacity requirement for future to meet the production plan.
Manufacturing process technology begins from job shop process technology at the start up phase and
move towards a continuous process technology. The volume and standardization are low at the
startup phase and high during the maturation and decline. Unit manufacturing cost at the startup is
lower than maturation and decline stage.
Facilities Layout
Layout is the physical arrangement of plant or industrial facility in selected location either in existing or in
new one. It is related to a number of aspects of production and operations management. Layout is
considered as disposition of various parts, components and space of plants, equipment and other physical
properties. It is a method of allocating machineries and equipment to the various production place or
processes.
Layout is a method of allocation of department upon a site, workgroup and equipment within department,
workstations, machines and stock-holding points within production facilities. Therefore, it is concerned
with configuration of department, work centers and equipment in the conversion process.
According to Moore, "Plant layout is a plan of an optimum arrangement of facilities including personnel,
operating equipment, storage space, material handling equipment and all the supporting services along
with the design of best structure to contain all these facilities."
Types of Layout
Layouts cannot be appropriate for a specific organization. It depends upon the nature of product and
production plant. Layouts are classified under the following categories:
1. Process Layout (Functional Layout)
Process layout is also known as functional layout. It arranges facilities and equipments in groups
according to the functions they perform. All machines performing similar type of operations is grouped at
one location in the process layout e.g. all lathes, milling machines etc. are grouped in the shop will be
clustered in like groups. Process layout can be used to provide highly customized product-service
bundles because it is flexible.
A process layout is characteristic of intermittent operations, service shops, job shops, or batch production,
which serve different customers with different needs. The volume of each customer’s order is low and the
sequence of operations required to complete a customer's order can vary considerably. The equipment in
a process layout is of general purpose, and the workers are skilled at operating the equipment in their
particular department. In this layout, all job-shop types of production, work areas are grouped together as
shown in figure 4.4 and 4.5. Hospital, university, distribution warehouses, office building, tailor shop,
work shop, printing press etc. use such type of layout.
Figure 4.4: Process Layout for a Medical Center
Pediatrics
ECG
USG
Pathology
Under Body
Paint Booth Engine Repairs Repairs Final Inspection
Exit
Shipping
Advantages
Less space for same volume of product in comparison to process layout.
It reduces the wastage due to continuous production.
Product completes in lesser time, less inventory in process.
Better co-ordination, easy production planning.
Low labour requirement and so does the supervision.
Less skill labour can also operate normal plants.
Disadvantages
Once one machine is out of duty, all product process is interrupted.
It needs heavy initial investment and even a small technical adjustment can lead to higher cost, larger
time.
Supervisors should be expert which may raise cost.
One mechanism can produce single type of product once.
Only in mass production cost efficiency can be achieved.
Product layout is further classified into different layouts. They are:
1. Straight Line Product Layout: It is fixed as a thread and machines are arranged in a straight line as
shown below:
Figure 4.7: Straight Line Product Layout
2. U-shaped Product Layout: The same straight line layout can be turned into "U" shape according to the need
of production management. Here, machines are placed in U-shape as shown below:
M1 M5
M2 M3 M4
3. L-shaped Product Layout: In L-shaped product layout, the machines are arranged in "L" shape as
shown in figure 4.9.
Figure 4.9: L-shaped Product Layout
Input
M1
M2 M3 M4 Finished Products
4. Serpentine Product Layout: The layout having the shape of a snake is known as serpentine layout. Beer and
cold drinks factory usually use this type of layout. The layout is as shown below:
Figure 4.10: Serpentine Production Layout
Input M1 M2 M3
M6 M5 M4
M7 Finished Products
Work Area
Position
Equipment B Material Equipment D
Facilities
Advantages
People can be assigned from starting to end of process.
It involves very longer movement of materials.
It ensures maximum flexibility of adjustments.
A number of projects can be undertaken from same type of layout.
Disadvantages
It needs huge investments and very hard to co-ordinate people and machines.
It involves high equipment handling cost.
It may not have easy maintenance service on spot (site)
It needs complete system for control purpose.
4. Combination Layout
Combination layout is also called the hybrid or mixed type of layout because it is combined with process
layout and product layout. In this layout, production area is laid out by process, whereas another area is
laid out by product and sometimes fixed position layout. Therefore, it is a combination of process,
product and fixed layout. A very common example of combination layout is the manufacture of the
electronic company to produce refrigerator, radio, computer, television, etc. To produce various parts and
sub components, the firm use process layout whereas for metal stamping, heat-treating and welding
process the firm use fixed position layout and finally assembly is done for finished goods by using
product layout.
Figure 4.12: Combination Layout
Advantages
It is flexible type of layout.
It is useful when you need various processes and you need to produces different component goods.
Advantage and efficiencies of different layout can be achieved.
Disadvantages of a single layout can be overcome by such layout.
Disadvantages
Needs huge investment, harder in control and co-ordination.
Useful for only firm producing different goods.
Combination layout requires combination of skills supervision, technology and physical components.
5. Cellular Layout / Group Technology Layout
Cellular layout assigns dissimilar machines or activities are grouped into work centers to work on
products that have similar shapes and processing requirements. Based on the concept of group
technology, dissimilar machines or activities are grouped into work centers, called cells, to process
families of parts or customers with similar requirements. The cells are arranged in relation to each other
so that material movement is minimized.
The application of group technology involves two basic steps. The first step is the determination of
component families or groups. The second step in applying GT is to arrange the plant's equipment into
cells, each containing the equipment used to process a particular family of components. Cellular layouts
can be much more flexible than product layouts and much more efficient than process layouts. Depending
on the way they are run, they can deliver a mixture of the advantage and disadvantages of process and
product layouts.
Advantages
Reduced material handling and transit time.
Reduced setup time.
Reduced work-in-process inventory.
Better use of human resources.
Easier to automate.
Disadvantages
Inadequate part families
Poorly balanced cells
Expanded training and scheduling of works.
Increased capital investment.
Comparison between Product Layout Vs Process
Layout
The differences between product layout and process layout are as follows:
Table Different between Product and Process Layout
Basic Product Layout Process Layout
Description Sequential arrangement of activities Functional grouping of activities
Type of process Continuous, mass production, mainly assembly Intermittent, job shop, batch production, mainly fabrication
Product Standardized, made to stock Varied, made to order
Demand Stable Fluctuating
Volume High Low
Equipment Special purpose General purpose
Workers Limited skills Varied skills
Inventory Low-in-process, high finished High-in-process, low finished goods
Storage space Small Large
Material handling Fixed path (conveyor) Variable path (forklift)
Aisles Narrow Wide
Scheduling Part of balancing Dynamic
Layout decision Line balancing Machine Location
Goal Equalize work at each station Minimize material handling cost
Advantage Efficiency Flexibility
Source: Russell & Taylor, (2009). “Operations Management: Along the Supply Chain”
2. Selection of Community
Many communities activity try to attract new businesses, offering financial and other
incentives, because they are viewed as potential sources of future tax revenues and new job
opportunities. However, communities do not, as a rule, want firms that will create pollution
problems or otherwise lessen the quality of life in the community. Local groups may activity
seek to exclude certain companies on such grounds, and a company may have to go to great
lengths to convince local officials that it will be a “responsible citizen”. Furthermore, some
organizations discover that even though overall community attitude is favorable, there may
still be considerable opposition to specific sites from nearby residents who object to possible
increased levels of noise, traffic, or pollution. Examples of this include community resistance
to airport expansion, changes in zoning, construction of unclear facilities, and highway
construction.
i. Labour Facility: Despite the talk of mechanization and automation, the importance of
labour on the industrial side has not been completely lost. Labour is an important factor in the
production of goods. An adequacy of labour supply at reasonable wages is very essential for
the smooth and successful working of an organization. The development of the plantation
industry in Nepal has been due to, among other things, the availability of adequate labour at
cheap rates. The labour required may be skilled or unskilled. It is skilled labour which
influences plant location because unskilled labour is supposed to be available everywhere,
especially in our country.
ii. Quality of Life: Good schools, recreational facilities, cultural events, and an attractive
lifestyle contribute to quality of life. This factor can make the difference in location decisions.
Nowadays, more than 50 percent of new industrial jobs are being shifted towards non-urban
regions. Reasons for this movement include high costs of living, high crime rates, and general
decline in the quality of life in many large cities.
iii. Community and Labour Attitudes: Community attitude towards their work and towards
the prospective industries can make or mar the industry. The community attitudes towards
supporting trade union activities are important criteria. Facility location in specific location is
not desirable even though all factors are favouring because of labour attitude towards
management which brings very often the strikes and the lockouts.
vi. Local Taxes and Restrictions: Local authorities collect changes for the supply of water,
electricity and other facilities. They also collect various taxes from industrials units. They
impose restrictions on the location of new units in the public interest. It is natural, therefore,
for industrials to prefer an area where such taxes and restrictions are the least irksome.
iv. Finance and Research Facilities: Adequate capital is essential for the successful working
of any organization. A place where facilities for raising capital are available attracts new
industries. This is particularly true in developing countries, where capital is not available
uniformly throughout the country. In advanced countries, the case is different because, in
such counties, capital is distributed uniformly.
In the course of its working, a factory may encounter a number of problems. Whenever a
problem crops up, it has to be examined and a suitable solution has to be found. Moreover, a
manufacturing unit has to be dynamic, i.e., it should always be on the lookout for new
technology. For this purpose, research facilities are essential; and a place where such facilities
are available naturally attracts new industries.
v. Other Factors: Still other factors may need to be considered, including room for
expansion, construction costs, accessibility to multiple modes of transportation, the cost of
shuffling people and materials between plants, insurance costs, competition from other firms
for the workforce, local ordinances (such as pollution or noise control regulations), community
attitudes, and many others. For global operations, firms need a good local infrastructure and
local employees who are educated and have good skills. Many firms are concluding that large,
centralized manufacturing facilities in low-cost countries with poorly trained workers are not
sustainable. Smaller, flexible facilities located in the countries that the firm serves allow it to
avoid problems related to trade barriers like tariffs and quotas and the risk that changing
exchange rates will adversely affect its sales and profits.
A. Qualitative Techniques
The qualitative factors which cannot be measured in terms of money and expressed in terms of
numerical values are analyzed by using following techniques:
1. Simple Comparative Chart Analysis
Simple comparative chart is one of the techniques of analyzing intangible factors for selecting
facilities location. The following steps should be followed:
Step 1: Recognize the critical intangible factors affecting location decision. For example: labour
supply, business climate, community attitude, union activities, employee morale,
competence of managers, reputation of enterprises, goods public relation.
Step 2: Compare and rank all alternative locations on the basis of these factors like good or bad,
favourable or unfavourable, important or not important, etc.
Location A Location B Location C
Suitable More suitable Unsuitable
Good Very Good Worst
Step 3: Select the best location for organization.
Simple Comparative Chart
Intangible factors Location A Location B Location C
Labour supply Suitable More suitable Unsuitable
Business climate Good Very good Worst
Community attitude Unfavourable Favourable More favourable
Union activities Important Less important More important
Decision: On the basis of above simple comparative chart, location 'B' is selected as the best
location than 'A' and 'C'.
2. Factor/Point Rating Method
Factor rating method is also used for evaluating wide range of intangible factors associated
importantly with location. It is recognized as a most applicable method so it is most widely used
technique. It is improved technique than simple rating method because simple comparative chart
method does not break down factors into sub-factors but factor rating method breakdowns factors
into sub-factors for evaluation and analysis. Factor rating method is a kind of survey technique
which follows following steps:
Step 1: Identify the sensitive factors for location decisions. For example, direct materials, direct
labour, power, taxes, insurance etc.
Step 2: Rate each factor from 1(very poor) to 5 (very good) according to their merit basis. For
example, Factor rate – 4, 3, 2, 5, 1.
Step 3: Rate the alternative location from 1 (very low) to 10 (very high) according to their merits
of each characteristics. For example, 10, 6, 8, 4, 2, so on.
Step 4: Multiply the factor rate and alternative location rate and find the total score of each
alternative location.
Step 5: Select the location with highest score.
Decision: Since total cumulative score for the location 'C' is highest i.e. 245, location 'C' is selected for the
purposed sugar factory.
Quantitative Techniques
The quantitative factors which can be measured in terms of money and expressed in terms of
numerical values are analyzed by using following techniques:
1. Centre Gravity Method
Centre of gravity or weight centre is a technique of quantitative method for locating a facility such
as a warehouse at the centre of movement in a geographic are based on weight and distance. It is a
mathematical technique that can be used for locating a distribution centre that will minimize
distribution cost. This method identifies a set of coordinates designating a central location on a
map relative to all other locations. This has following steps:
Step 1: Place location on a coordinate system.
Step 2: Determine the centre of gravity using equations/formula.
The coordinates for the location of the new facility are computed using the following
formulas:
n n
XiWi YiWi
i=1 i=1
X= , Y=
n n
Wi Wi
i=1 i=1
Where,
X, Y = Coordinates of the new facility at centre of gravity.
Xi, Yi = Coordinates of existing facility i.
Wi = Annual weight shipped from facility i.
Example 2
A supplier to the electric utility industry has a heavy product, and the transportation costs are high. One
market area includes the lower part of the Great Lakes region and the upper portion of the southeastern
region. More than 600000 tons are to be shipped to five major customer locations. Calculate the centre of
gravity.
Customer location Tons Shipped '000' X, Y coordinates
A 5 (8, 14)
B 92 (7, 12)
C 70 (10, 14)
D 40 (11, 9)
E 35 (7, 14)
Solution
n
Wi = 5 + 92 + 70 + 40 + 35 = 242
i=1
n
XiWi = 5(8) + 92(7) + 70(10) + 40(11) + 35(7) = 2069
i=1
n
XiW i
i=1 2069
X= = 242 = 8.6
n
Wi
i=1
n
Wi = 5 + 92 + 70 + 40 + 35 = 242
i=1
n
YiWi = 5(14) + 92(12) + 70(14) + 40(9) + 35(14) = 3004
i=1
n
YiW i
i=1 3004
Y= = 242 = 12.4
n
Wi
i=1
Example 3
Lal Prasad, owner of Hallmark Shopping Mall, wants to expand his capacity. He is considering three
locations-Lajimpat, Baneshwor and Boudha. He wishes to find the most economical location for an
expected volume of 2,000 units per year.
Location Fixed cost($) Variable cost ($)
Lajimpat 30000 75
Baneshwor 60000 45
Boudha 110000 25
Solution
For each of the three locations, total cost is calculated with 2000 units of volume of production.
We know,
Total cost = Fixed cost + Cost per unit × Volume of production.
For Lajimpat,
Total cost = $ 30000 + $75 × 2000 = $ 180,000
For Baneshwor,
Total cost = $60000 + $45 × 2000 = $150,000
For Boudha,
Total cost = $110000 + $25 × 2000 = $ 160,000
Hence, with an expected volume of 2000 units per year, Baneshwor provides the lowest cost location. So,
Baneshwor is selected as best location.
Expected profit at Baneshwor = Total revenue – Total cost
= $ 120(2,000) – $ 150,000 = $ 90,000 per year
Calculating the Cross-Over Point
For Lajimpat and Baneshwor
30000 + 75x = 60000 + 45x
or, 30x = 30000
x = 1000 units.
For Baneshwor and Boudha
60000 + 45x = 110000 + 25x
or, 20x = 50000
x = 2500 units
Results
Volume range Lowest cost location
0-1000 units Lajimpat
1000-2500 units Baneshwor
2500 units Boudha
$ 180,000
$ 160,000
$ 150,000
$ 130,000
$ 110,000
Total Cost
$ 80,000
$ 60,000
$ 30,000
Costs of Inventory
1. Purchase (or Production) Cost
The value of an item is its unit purchasing (production) cost. This cost becomes significant when
availing the price discounts. This cost is expressed as Rs/ unit.
2. Ordering Cost
It is also known by the name procurement cost or replenishment cost or acquisition cost. Cost of
ordering is the amount of money expended to get an item into inventory. This takes into account all
the costs incurred from calling the quotations to the point at which the items are taken to stock.
There are two types of costs Fixed costs and Variable costs. Fixed costs do not depend on the number
of orders where as variable costs change with respect to the number of orders placed. The salaries and
wages of permanent employee involved in purchase function and control of inventory purchasing,
incoming inspection, accounting for purchase orders constitute the major part of the fixed costs. The
cost of placing an order varies from one organization to another. They are generally classified under
the following heads:
i. Purchasing: The clerical and administrative cost associated with the purchasing cost of
requisitioning material, placing the order, follow-up, receiving and evaluating quotations.
ii. Inspection: The cost of checking material after they are received by the supplier for quantity and
quality and maintaining records of the receipts.
iii. Accounting: The cost of checking supply against each order making payments and maintaining
records of purchases.
3. Inventory Carrying Costs (Holding Costs)
These are the costs associated with holding a given level of inventory on hand and this cost vary in
direct proportion to the amount of holding and period of holding the stock in stores.
The holding costs include,
i. Storage costs (rent, heating, lighting etc.)
ii. Handling costs: Costs associated with moving the items such as cost of labour, equipment for
handling.
iii. Depreciation, Taxes and insurance.
iv. Costs on record keeping.
v. Product deteriorations and obsolescence.
vi. Spoilage, breakage, pilferage and loss due to perishable nature.
4. Shortage Cost:
When there is a demand for the product and the item needed is not in stock, then we incur a shortage
cost or cost associated with stock out.
Then storage costs include:
i. Backorder costs.
ii. Loss of future sales.
iii. Loss of customer good will.
iv. Extra cost associated with urgent, small quantity ordering costs.
v. Loss of profit contribution by lost sales revenue.
The unsatisfied demand can be satisfied at a later stage (by means of back orders) or unfulfilled demand is
lost completely (no back ordering, the shortage costs become proportional to only the shortage
quantity).
Base stock
Q4 level
Q3
Q1 Q2
0 T 2T 3T 4T
Time (T)
From the figure 6.5, it is clear that inventory will be inspected in certain time interval. There is no
constant order quantity (Q). On the first order quantity Q 1, second order Q2, third order Q3 and fourth
order Q4 should be placed according to the inventory position at the time of inspection. As a result,
sometimes, stock out may occur during the inventory planning period.
Advantages of ‘P’ Model
This system has some distinct advantages.
1. The ordering and inventory costs are low. The ordering cost is considerably reduced though
follow-up work for each delivery may be necessary.
2. The suppliers will also offer attractive discounts as sales guaranteed.
3. The system works well for materials which exhibit an irregular or seasonal usage and whose
purchase must be planned in advance on the sales estimates.
Disadvantages of ‘P’ Model
The system has certain limitations also.
1. It compels a periodic review of all items; this in itself makes the system somewhat inefficient.
Because of differences in usage rates, supplies may not have to be ordered until the succeeding
review. Conversely, the usage of some items during the period may have increased to the point
where they should have been ordered before the current review date. Consequently, this system
must be augmented with a minimum balance figure which signals the need for an early reorder in
the case of a sharp usage increase.
2. Equally important, the system demands the establishment of rather inflexible order quantities in
the interest of administrative efficiency. Theoretically, there exists an optimum economic order
quantity for each item, depending upon its price structure, its rate of usage and attendant
internal costs. However, because all items must fit reasonably well into a limited number of
ordering cycles under this system, actual order quantities may deviate substantially from the
optimum.
3. The periodic review system tends to peak the purchasing work around the review dates.
ii. Continuous or Perpetual Inventory System (Q - Model)
In this model or system, a fixed quantity of material is ordered whenever the stock on hand reaches
the reorder point. The fixed quality of material ordered each time is nothing but the economic order
quantity (EOQ). When the new consignment arrives, the total stock (existing plus new arrival) shall
be within the maximum and the minimum limits.
In other words, this system first of all determines the fixed order quantity Q, and reorder stock level
ROL. Fixed order may be in units or amount but the reorder level should be in the units. In other words,
order quantity of stock Q, and the level of stock ROL, at which level the order should be placed is
predetermined. Therefore it is also called fixed order quantity/perpetual inventory system or economic
order quantity model (EOQ) or Q/R model.
Figure : Continuous or Perpetual Inventory System
MS Maximum
Stock Level
Inventory levels (Q)
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
ROL
ABC Analysis
The inspiration behind the ABC analysis has been drawn from V. Pareto, an Italian economist and
sociologist (1842-1923) who generated some highly debatable concepts of economics and sociology. One of
the most interesting fact to a student of inventory management is the concept known as “Pareto’s Laws”.
One of the widely used techniques for control of inventories is the ABC (always better control) analysis.
The ABC approach is a means of categorizing inventory items into three classes ‘A’, ‘B’ and ‘C’ according
to the potential amount to be controlled. Once inventory is classified, we have a firm base for deciding
where we will put our effort. Logically, we expect to maintain strong controls over the ‘A’ items taking
whatever special actions needed to maintain availability of these items and hold stocks at the lowest
possible levels consistent with meeting demands. At the other end of the scale, we cannot afford the
expenses of rigid controls, frequent ordering, expediting, etc., because of the low amounts in this area.
Thus, with the ‘C’ group we may maintain somewhat higher safety stocks, order more months of supply;
expect lower levels of customer service, or all the three. It is for selective approach, ABC analysis is often
called the Selective Inventory Control Method (SIM).
Pareto’s principle was brought to the attention of people concerned with inventory management by H.F.
Dickie, who applied Pareto’s law to inventory and developed the general concept of ABC analysis. Like so
many ideas, however it has not been completely understood. Many people refer to the ABC system or the
ABC technique. The idea of distribution of value for inventory stratification is neither a system nor a
technique; it is a fundamental management principle with universal application potential.
The following procedure is suggested for developing an ABC analysis:
1. List each item carried in inventory by number or some other designation.
2. Determine the annual volume of usage and rupee value of each value.
3. Multiply each item’s annual volume of usage by its rupee value.
4. Complete each item’s percentage of the total inventory in items of annual usage in rupees.
5. Select the top 10 percent of all items which have the highest rupee percentages and classify them as
‘A’ items.
6. Select the next 20 percent of all items with next highest rupee percentages and designate those as ‘B’
items.
7. The next 70 percent of all items with the lowest rupee percentages are ‘C’ items.
Figure ABC Classifications of Inventory Items
100
90
80
70
60
Percent of Total sales
50
40
30
20
A B C
10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Percent of Total items
E
Graphing the two costs, viz., carrying costs and ordering costs show exactly, where the total cost curve is
at its lowest point. An examination of the two curves reveals that the carrying cost curve is linear i.e., the
more the inventory held in any period, greater will be the cost of holding it. Ordering cost curve, on the
other hand, is different. Ordering in small quantities means more acquisition and higher ordering costs.
The ordering costs decrease with increase in order sizes.
Assumptions of EOQ
EOQ can be the carrying with the help of a mathematical formula. Following assumptions are implied in
the calculation:
i. Demand for the product is constant and uniform throughout the period,
ii. Lead time (time from ordering to receipt) is constant,
iii. Price per unit of product is constant,
iv. Inventory holding cost is based on average inventory,
v. Ordering costs are constant, and
vi. All demands for the product will be satisfied (no back orders are allowed).
Supplier A Consumer A
Raw Material Manufacturing Warehousing Distribution
Supplier B Consumer B
(Storage) (Factory Production) (Finished Goods) Channels
Supplier C Consumer C
Supplier Manufacturing Marketing
Management Management Management
Figure: 11.2 Typical Manufacturing Supply Chain
Supplier A
Supplier B
Supply change management is an essential and a hot topic in business today. The idea is to apply a total
system approach to managing the entire flow of information, materials and services from raw materials
suppliers through factories and warehouses to the end customers. It is the integration of the activities that
procure materials and services, transform them into intermediates goods and final products and deliver
them to the customers. Its basic objective is to build a chain of suppliers that focuses on maximizing value
to the ultimate customer. Now a day, competition is no longer between companies; it is between supply
chains and those supply chains are often global.
Supply chain management is one of the most important, strategic aspects of operations management
because it encompasses so many related functions. Whom to buy materials from, how to transport goods
and services, and how to distribute them in the most cost-effective, timely manner constitutes much of an
organization’s strategy planning. Contracting with the wrong supplier can result in poor-quality materials
and late deliveries. Selecting the wrong mode of transportation or carrier can mean late deliveries to
customers that will require high, costly inventories to offset. As firms strive to increase their
competitiveness via product customization, high quality, cost reductions, and speed to market, added
emphasis is placed on the supply chain. Effective supply chain management makes suppliers “partners” in
the firm’s strategy to satisfy an ever-changing market place. A competitive advantage may depend on a
close short-term and long-term strategic relationship with a few suppliers. For the goods and services to be
obtained from outside sources, the firm must decide on a supply chain strategy. There are following
strategies available under supply chain:
A first strategy is the approach of negotiating with many suppliers and playing one suppliers against
another.
A second strategy is to develop long-term “partnering” relationships with a few suppliers to satisfy the
end customer.
A third strategy is a vertical integration, in which a firm decides to use vertical backward integration
by actually buying supplier.
A forth strategy is a combination of few suppliers and vertical integration, is known as “Keiretsu
network”. In “Keiretsu”, suppliers become part of a company coalition.
A fifth strategy is to develop virtual companies that use suppliers on an as-needed basis.
The Need for Supply Chain Management
There are following issues that make it clear that management of supply chains is essential to business
success.
1. The Need to Improve Operations: During the last decade, many organizations adopted practices
such as lean production and total quality management (TQM). As a result, they were able to achieve
improved quality while wringing much of the excess costs out of their systems. Although there is still
room for with procurement, distribution, and the major gains have been realized. Opportunity now
lies largely with procurement, distribution, and logistic – the supply chain.
2. Increasing Levels of Outsourcing: Organizations are increasing their levels of outsourcing. Buying
goods or services instead of organizations are spending increasing amounts on supply-related
activities, (wrapping, packaging, moving, loading and unloading, and storing). A significant amount
of the cost and time spent on these and other related activities may unnecessary.
3. Increasing Transportation Cost: Transportation costs are increasing, and they need to be more
carefully managed.
4. Competitive Pressures: Competitive pressures have led to an increasing number of new products,
shorter product development cycles, and increased demand for customization. And in some industries,
most notably consumer electronics, product life cycles are relatively short. Added to this are adoption of
quick-response strategies and efforts to reduce lead times.
5. Increasing Globalization: Increasing globalization has expended the physical length of supply
chains. A global supply chain increases the challenges of managing a supply chain. Having far-flung
customers and/or suppliers means longer lead times and greater opportunities for disruption of
deliveries. Often currency differences and monetary fluctuations are factors, as well as language and
cultural differences.
6. Increasing Importance of E-business: The increasing importance of e-business has added new
dimensions to business buying and selling and has presented new challenges.
7. The Complexity of Supply Chains: Supply chains are complex; they are dynamic, and they have
many inherent uncertainties that can adversely affect the supply chain, such as inaccurate forecasts,
late deliveries, substandard quality, equipment breakdowns, and canceled or changed orders.
8. The Need to Manage Inventories: Inventories play a major role in the success or failure of a supply
chain, so it is important to coordinate inventory levels throughout a supply chain. Shortages can severely
disrupt the timely flow of work and have far-reaching impacts, while excess inventories add unnecessary
costs. It would not be unusual to find inventory shortages in some parts of a supply chain and excess
inventories in other parts of the same supply chain.