Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
A Scientific paper submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements in BIO 150 (Ecology)
laboratory under Prof. Kristine O. Abenis, 1 st semester, 2019-2020.
ABSTRACT
Population growth and competition were observed among Lemna sp. and Spirodela sp. The
fronds of both species were placed in pure and mixed cultures with two treatments for each
culture as it is observed ten times every other day. The results show that Lemna has greater
population when subjected to the nutrient treatment and Spirodela on distilled water
treatment. The results from the mixed culture shows that both can coexist with each other
as the population is greater at the treatment with soil in its environment. The data shows an
exponential increase in population growth and some minimal decrease at some point which
regards that population size can exceed carrying capacity but will stabilize itself below the
maximum requirements if exceeded. Graphs constructed from these data shows a logistic
growth curve which can be supported by the computed instantaneous growth rate between
intervals of observation days. It is concluded that Lemna is the more competitive and fit
species of duckweed due to its proportional growth with the concentration of nutrients in
its environment, greater population size on distilled water medium, and morphological
advantage over the other.
INTRODUCTION
individual with time in a certain population. In this experiment, the population growth of
Lemna sp. and Spirodela sp. were focused on as it is treated into their respective ecological
of populations of at least two different species that interact directly and indirectly within a
defined geographic area. The two species of duckweeds are floating macrophytes which
competes for space, light, and nutrients along a gradient of biotic and abiotic factors.
Harper (1977) suggests that these types of free-floating aquatic plants are excellent models
for growth rate determination due to its continuous growth compared to most plants that
have life cycles with discrete jumps in their population size such as alteration in size and
Kopeny (2002) explains that a population growth rate has three phases when
resources are depleted. It is known as logistic population growth where growth rate slows
and eventually stops, thus, exhibiting a sigmoidal or S-shaped growth curve which can be
are limited at their disposal. The Gause Competitive Exclusion Principle states that two
species with similar ecological requirements cannot coexist and will undergo competition
with each other. Volterra (1931) emphasizes that 4 outcomes of these interactions can be
predicted by the Lotka-Volterra model whereas it can be one of the species prevail and the
another would eventually be completely excluded, and vice versa, either species wins based
first two outcomes, Jefferies (2000) stated that two species sharing limited resources may
result to depression of population growth rate and maximum population size of either of
the species. To distinguish Lemna sp. from Spirodela sp, it is relatively smaller but both
species have a circular thalli or fronds. The hypothesis: Lemna sp. will have higher
population on both treatments in pure and mixed cultures than Spirodela sp. can be
formulated.
The main objective of this study is to determine the changes in the population
growth and competition of Lemna sp. and Spirodela sp. The specific objectives were the
following:
both species;
2. to compare the growth of Lemna sp. and Spirodela sp. in different types of
media; and
the Institute of Biological Sciences in the University of the Philippines Los Baños.
Three replicate jars were prepared for treatments A and B whereas treatment A
water. Ten fronds of Lemna sp. were introduced to one set of treatments A and B. The same
number of Spirodela sp. fronds was also introduced to another set of similar treatments.
Separating the fronds during the preparation of the pure cultures was avoided to distinguish
the count easily and represent the initial population (N o) as 10. Five fronds of Lemna sp.
and another five fronds of Spirodela sp. were introduced to the remaining sets as these
After preparing the cultures, the jars were covered with transparent plastic and was
punched few small holes to give aid for aeration. These cultures were kept in the designated
area in a greenhouse and assured that all fronds are floating in the media.
The total number of fronds of Lemna sp. and Spirodela sp. were counted every
other day for each treatment until the frond count levels off. Visible new buds that are half
the size of the old buds were counted as separate individuals while the fronds that turned
yellow or dried up were disregarded in the count. After each observation, it is assured that
no fronds are left adhering on the sides of the bottle so that all fronds are still floating on
for each treatment. Frond count VS time was plotted as separate line graphs for Lemna
grown as pure and mixed cultures. Another two graphs follow the same attributes for
Spirodela. The instantaneous growth rate (rinst) at each observation interval in all cultures
𝑁(𝑡+1)
𝜆= (Equation 1)
𝑁𝑡
rinst = ln λ (Equation 2)
After 10 observations, the results from the obtained data is as follows for both
Table 1. Population Growth of Pure and Mixed Culture of Lemna sp. and Spirodela sp.
Table 1 shows the mean population of the Lemna and Spirodela throughout the
course of 10 observation for 23 days. This shows the trend of the duckweed growth over
the mean of three replicates for each treatment. Generally, Lemna has greater population
density than of Spirodela. It can be observed that in pure culture, Lemna has greater
population size when subjected to distilled water and soil medium but on the other hand,
Spirodela’s population size is less when subjected to a medium with nutrients. This effect
competition occurs with members of the same species in the population. According to the
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (2004), Lemna grows best in waters mixed with
different nutrients. This explains the trend of Lemna having greater population density on
the soil and distilled water medium where its environment is eutrophic. On the other hand,
the effect of nutrients to Spirodela tends to decline its growth. Liu (2017) explains that
Spirodela growth increases only at media where nutrient concentration is at its smallest.
For the mixed culture, it can be observed that Lemna is still greater in population
density than Spirodela on either type of medium. Although it is discussed earlier that
Spirodela has lower population density when subjected to the medium with nutrients, the
results for the mixed culture shows the opposite. This is a possible result of these two
population growth in competing species of Salvinia and Spirodela, the research concludes
competitive outcomes between the two species and eventually ensured their continued
coexistence. This environment is similar to the pure culture set-up B and the coexistence
of Lemna and Spirodela is evident as their population growth thrived higher than of the
Table 2. Instantaneous Growth Rate of Lemna and Spirodela between day intervals
The instantaneous growth rate between day intervals of the observations shown in
Table 2 were computed to monitor the increase and decrease of the population between
observation days. It is evident that the last observations at 9-10 days shows stabilizing
values and significantly lower than those of between the previous observations. This agrees
with the logistic growth curve which is illustrated at Figure 1. In pure cultures, it is
observed that Spirodela decreased in population 6 times, since there are 6 negative values
obtained from the calculated instantaneous growth rate, and Lemna only exhibited 3 times
of population decline. In mixed cultures, Spirodela also had more population decline, with
5 negative values, significantly on the nutrient medium, and Lemna only had 3 negative
values for the computed growth rate. This shows that the biomass of the species has already
reached its carrying capacity. However, it is restored again with positive values for the next
interval which would mean that the logistic growth curve would be followed with medium
time lags and dampened oscillations. Additionally, Cuevas et al (2012) suggests that the
growth of the population will be negative, indicating a population decrease until the
population size and the carrying capacity will become equal and stable.
Figure III. Lemna in Distilled Water Medium Figure II. Spirodela in Distilled Water Medium
Figures 2 and 3 shows the population growth curve of Lemna and Spirodela,
conforms to the logistic growth curve illustrated in Figure 1 and the computed data for the
instantaneous growth rate. It is thorough for both species that pure culture provided greater
population growth than mixed culture. This occurrence in mixed culture was a result of
differential resource utilization. Since it is both in distilled water medium, the only
resources these species could utilize among the mixed culture is sunlight and space. The
population growth is lower on the mixed culture but coexistence occurs since the combined
Figure V. Lemna in Soil + Distilled Water Medium Figure IV. Spirodela in Soil + Distilled Water Medium
Figures 4 and 5 above shows the difference of pure and mixed culture when the two
species of duckweed is subjected to soil in distilled water. The results can be observed to
also have a sigmoidal or S-shaped curved which also indicates that it is a logistic growth.
Although the results resembles the one with distilled water medium with pure culture
possessing the greater frond count, it is evident that the curves touched or obtained
relatively close values at certain points. This is a result of resource partitioning through
differential resource utilization in which one species uses a portion that is less used by the
other.
the environment can support. The pure culture with soil and distilled water media provided
the higher carrying capacity for Lemna. This is the result of its growth rate being
proportional to the nutrient availability as Farmer (2016) has explained for this genera. On
the other hand, the pure culture with distilled water media provided the higher carrying
capacity for Spirodela as earlier discussed, that higher nutrient concentration depletes the
growth of Spirodela since it is reinforced with higher metal concentration which affects the
growth of Spirodela negatively, thus, it has higher carrying capacity on a medium without
A well-established sigmoidal curve that represents logistic growth among the other
set-ups is the one with Spirodela on distilled water medium. The exponential phase and
stationary phase can be clearly distinguished in the graph on Figure 3. The instantaneous
growth rate values reinforce this statement as it has relatively higher and outlier values on
the observations with increasing trend and has relatively close values during the final stages
of observation. To apply the phases of population growth, 0-3rd day is the lag phase, 3rd-
12th day is the exponential phase with an emphasis on the spike between the 3 rd- 8th day
interval and the 12th-23rd day represents the diminishing growth phase with only a few
The growth curve that is observed between the pure and mix cultures appears to be
distinct with each other as mix culture exhibits a lower population growth than of the pure
culture. This is affected by changing birth and death rates which can also be observed in
Table 2 where there are decreasing population between intervals. Additionally, there are
density-dependent factors that affect these curves such as competition between the two
species.
Lastly, the effect of competition to these species is that their population growth is
lower. It can be observed that pure culture has higher population size than mixed culture
but it is evident that in the mixed culture with soil and distilled water medium, the
population is higher for both species than the medium without nutrients. As mentioned
Bell, Stambolie, and Leng (1995) explains that nutrients are absorbed through all surfaces
of the duckweed leaf. Since Spirodela has larger leaf size than Lemna, it has a tendency to
absorb nutrients more than the latter, but it is mentioned that higher nutrient concentration
decreases its population growth. Hence, Lemna will have the better competitive ability.
Duckweed population growth is not only controlled by the nutrients it receives but also by
its space and sunlight resources. Since Lemna is smaller, it would occupy less space and
will have more for its reproduction. Additionally, Keddy (1976) argues that Lemna is more
competitive and fit than other species under the family Lemnaceae since it has the ability
to increase its carrying capacity along with increasing nutrients and high tolerance to
different pH ranges.
Duckweed species of Lemna sp. and Spirodela sp. were subjected to be observed
in terms of their population growth and competition. The set-up involves two cultures, pure
and mixed, with two treatments for each. Treatment A contains distilled water and
treatment B contains soil and distilled water. These were put in jars and observed every
other day until 10 observations were made. In the pure culture, Lemna has a higher
reinforced by the explanation that Lemna has proportional growth rate with the
with the smallest amount of nutrient concentration. In mixed culture, Lemna is evidently
greater in population size in both treatments, but it is significant that the individual
population of both species is greater on the medium with soil and can be explained through
Taking everything into account, the hypothesis: Lemna sp. will have higher
population on both treatments in pure and mixed cultures than Spirodela sp. is accepted.
Spirodela having larger fronds consumed much of its space and relied mostly on the
sunlight as a resource and Lemna having proportional growth to the nutrient concentration
of its environment makes it a more competitive species than Spirodela. It is certain that the
carrying capacity of a population can be exceeded and will undergo negative instantaneous
growth rate after the said overrun. Taking all these data into application, it is still needed
duckweed can be taken into account, adjusting of its environmental factors such as pH and
mineral content. The possible errors in this experiment is the availability of sunlight as a
resource in the storage place for the set-ups. It is also possible that the jars were shaken
which may have caused the death of some of the fronds. It is recommended to use the same
amount of time since the logistic growth curve can be easily distinguished over the data
BAUER, L., CENTER, T.D., MARTIN, M.R., TIPPING, P.W. 2008. Competition
between Salvinia minima and Spirodela polyrhiza mediated by nutrient
levels and herbivory. Aquatic Botany. Journal retrieved from
www.elsevier.com/locate/aquabot. pp. 231-234.
BELL, R., LENG, R.A., STAMBOLIE, J.H. 1995. Duckweed - a potential high-protein
feed resource for domestic animals and fish. Livestock Research for Rural
Development. Centre of Duckweed Research & Development University of
New England Armidale, NSW 2351. Volume 7, Number 1.
CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY & HYDROLOGY. 2004. Information sheet: Lemna species.
Retrieved from
http://www.ceh.ac.uk/sci_programmes/documents/duckweeds.pdf.
CUEVAS, V.C., CERVANCIA, C.R., ZAFARALLA, M.T., LIT, I.L., JR., BARRION-
DUPO, A.L.A. & LAMBIO, I.A.F. 2012. Exploring Ecology (no ed.).
University of the Philippines Los Baños: Environmental Biology Division,
IBS.
JEFFERIS, R.L. 2000. Population Growth: Experimental Models using Duckweed (Lemna
sp.). ESA lab pp. 1-3.
KEDDY, P. 1976. Lakes as Islands: The Distributional Ecology of Two Aquatic Plants,
Lemna Minor L. and L. Trisulca L. Ecology 57:353-359.
KOPENY, M. 2002. Lecture #K5 - Population Ecology, Continued. In BIO 202. Retrieved
from http://faculty.virginia.edu/bio202/lectures/lecturek5.pdf.
LANG, J. M. & BENBOW, M. E. 2013. Species Interactions and Competition. Nature
Education Knowledge 4(4):8.
LIU, C., CHEN, L., LIANG, X., JIN, L., SHI, H., XIANJIANG, K., and, ZHAO, Z. 2017.
Inter- and intra-specific competition of duckweed under multiple heavy
metal contaminated water. Aquatic Toxicology. DOI:
10.1016/j.aquatox.2017.09.023.
APPENDIX