Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BELGAUM
The standard requirements for Hip joints include: mechanical properties (yield stress,
plasticity, Young modulus, fatigue strength etc.), physical properties (density, magnetic
properties etc.), chemical properties (resistance to different forms of corrosion and wear
degradation), biological properties (biocompatibility), and price. Thus, all the time one
must take into account each of properties, and their interrelations. This problem is also
unresolved, usually all properties are considered separately, no expert systems have been
proposed to optimize the implant design and materials. The investigations of all possible
factors which may affect the lifetime, together with response of human body, bone parts,
tissues, and muscles, changing itself with increasing age, cannot be performed by normal
procedures, but needs more sophisticated approach such as neural networks approach.
In the present work, considering Ti-6Al-4Vand Al2O3 Ceramic Composites as
the materials for the cemented type hip prosthesis, the fatigue life of these hip prosthesis
will be determined for five different daily living activities viz., slow walking, fast
walking, normal walking, sitting and standing. Fatigue calculations have been carried out
using Goodman, Soderberg, and Gerber fatigue theories. The stress analysis for different
activities will be carried out using finite element software ANSYS and then the fatigue
analysis is performed using residual degradation model.
Bergmann et al. [1] measured the hip contact forces for different activities like slow
walking, normal walking, fast walking, climbing upstairs and downstairs, standing on 2-
1-2 legs, knee bend, standing up and sitting down. For five different patients they took
the data. Sheikh et al., [2] analyzed a hip joint subjected to a dynamic load due to
stumbling and the peak static load during different patient activity and concluded that it
was not the peak stress but rather the proportion of the stressed elements which should be
the indicator for a precise analysis of the load transfer mechanism.
Sivasankar et al.,[3, 4] did a stress analysis and a design optimization on a conical stem
hip prosthesis, using Ti6Al4V and UHMWPE materials and they had assessed that the
failure occurred in most of the cases at the interface of the bone cement to the bone. They
also had found even though the results were showing the UHMWPE material is having
high static strength, it was more prone to fatigue failure and prosthesis with Ti6Al4V was
more resistant to fatigue failure.
Styles et al., [5] conducted a fatigue test of a hip model with different activities, like sit to
stand movements and upstairs, downstairs climbing and they provided a novel
methodology for the dynamic testing of load bearing implants.
McCormack et al., [6] did a three dimensional stress analysis to determine the stress
distribution in the cement mantle cross-section of the hip prosthesis. They also did a
fatigue analysis of the prosthesis and found that under torsional loading, fatigue failure of
PMA fixed implants originated from pores located on the interfaces.
Li et al,[7] , developed a neumerical method for predicting the progressive failure of
thick laminated composite femoral components for efficiently and accurately predicting
damage initiation and propagation. Kim et al [8] determined the fatigue damage response
for cement bone constructs subjected to shear fatigue loading and observed a three phase
fatigue response with substantial early damage, followed by a long constant damage rate
region and a final abrupt increase in damage to fracture. They concluded that a
combination of the creep damage model with a constant final equivalent strain could be
used to assess the cement bone failure response of cemented implant systems.
Kayabasi and Erzincanli [9] designed and analyzed four different shaped hip prostheses
to find an optimum stem shape. They have carried out static as well as dynamic analysis
on the models and did fatigue analysis using Goodman, Soderberg and Gerber fatigue
theories. Also they have verified their results using Charnley’s model.
In the present work, considering Ti6Al4Vand Co-Cr alloy as the materials for the
cemented type hip prosthesis, the fatigue life of these hip prosthesis are determined for
five different daily living activities viz., slow walking, fast walking, normal walking,
sitting and standing. The stress analysis for different activities is carried out using finite
element software ANSYS and then the fatigue analysis is performed using residual
degradation model.
REFRENCES
1. G. Bergmann, G. Deuretzbacher, M. Heller, F. Graichen, A. Rohlmann, J. Strauss, G.
N.Duda, 2001, Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities, Journal of
Biomechanics 34, 859-871.
2. H. F. Sheikh, B. J. MacDonald, M. S. J. Hashmi, 2003, Finite element simulation of
the hip joint during stumbling: a comparison between static and dynamic loading, Journal
of Materials Processing Technology, 143-144, 249-255.
3. M. Sivasankar, D. Chakraborty, S. K. Dwivedy, 2004, Finite element analysis of
composite hip prosthesis, Proceedings of National Conference on Biomechanics held on
th st
19 -21 November 2004, 214-220.
4. M.Sivasankar, D.Chakraborty, S.K.Dwivedy, 2006, Fatigue analysis of artificial hip
joints for different materials, XVI conference of Society for Biomaterials and Artificial
Organs-India on Biomaterials, Tissue Engineering and Medical Diagnostics, IIT Delhi,
Feb’24-26.
5. C. M. Styles, S.L.Evans, P.J.Gregson. 1998, Development of fatigue lifetime
predictive test methods for hip implants: Part I. Test methodology, Biomaterials, 19,
1057-1065.
6. B.A.O. McCormack, P.J.Prendergast, and B.O. Dwyer, 1999, Fatigue of cemented hip
replacements under torsional loads, Fatigue fracture engineering material structures, 22,
33-40.
7. C.Li, C. Granger, H.D. Schutte Jr, S.B.Biggers Jr, J.M.Kennedy, R.A.Latour Jr,
2003,Failure analysis of composite femoral components for hip arthroplasty, Journal of
Rehabilitation Research and Development, 40(2), 131-146.
8. D.G.Kim, M.A. Miller, K.A.Mann, 2004, A fatigue damage model for the cement –
bone interface, Journal of Biomechanics, 37(10), 1505-1512.
9. O.Kayabasi and F.Erzincanli, 2006, Finite element modeling and analysis of a new
cemented hip prosthesis, Advances in Engineering Software, 37(7), 477-483.
10. J.N.Yang, 1978, Fatigue and residual strength degradation for graphite/epoxy
composites under tension-compression cyclic loadings, Journal of Composite Materials,
12, 19-39.