You are on page 1of 3

NAME_______________________ PD________



Eighty-three years ago, Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were put to
by the state of Massachusetts.

They had been wrongly convicted and sentenced to death for the robbery
and killing of two men, a paymaster and a guard who were delivering
wages to a shoe company. During the seven years of their imprisonment,
people around the world organized a campaign to save these two men--
both Italian immigrants and anarchists. But despite overwhelming support
and the abundance of evidence pointing to their innocence, Sacco and
Vanzetti were executed in 1927.

To understand why this travesty of justice occurred, we first have to look

at the hostile political climate towards immigrants and radicals. Following
the First World War, in what became known as the Red Scare, the U.S.
government responded to a wave of strikes and political unrest with force.
The Palmer Raids of the early 1920s, organized by Attorney General A.
Mitchell Palmer, resulted in thousands of
radicals, especially immigrants, being rounded up, beaten, and held for days
without the right to contact a lawyer or
even family.

It’s clear from the court proceedings that Sacco and Vanzetti were convicted
not because the evidence proved them guilty, but because they were
anarchists and immigrants.

Sacco, for example, was badgered by prosecutors as to why he dodged the

draft rather than fight in the First World War. Judge Webster Thayer, who
presided over the trial, said to the jury at the outset, "Although this man
(Sacco) may not have committed the crime attributed to him, he is
nonetheless culpable [guilty] because he is the enemy of our existing
institutions." Outside the courtroom, a friend of Judge Thayer’s reported that
he heard him say, "Did you see what I did with those anarchist bastards the
other day?"

The jury was made up of white, native-born people, and the jury foreman was
a former police chief who saluted the American flag every time he entered
the courtroom. This was the jury that, in the midst of an incredible anti-
immigrant backlash, was supposed to impartially decide the fate of two
Italian immigrants who were avowed anarchists. As an appendix to a
collection of Sacco and Vanzetti’s letters states, "Outside the courtroom, the
Red Scare hysteria was rampant; it was allowed to dominate within. The
prosecutor systematically played on the feelings of the jury by exploiting the
unpatriotic and despised beliefs of Sacco and Vanzetti, and the judge allowed
him thus to divert and pervert the jury’s mind."

The anti-Red sensationalism overshadowed the evidence put forward that

Sacco and Vanzetti were not the culprits. A total of 99 witnesses took the
stand to say that they were innocent. Just before the robbery took place,
Sacco was at the Italian consulate office, trying to obtain a passport--
something that a consulate official testified to. More than a dozen people
took the stand to verify that Vanzetti had delivered fish to their homes--miles
away from the crime scene--on the day of the killing. Prosecutors failed to
find the stolen money--or come up with a credible motive for why two
anarchists would steal workers’ wages.

During the years that they were behind bars, an impressive campaign was
launched to win them a new trial. On the eve of their August execution,
miners in Colorado went on strike; there were clashes with police in London,
Paris, and Geneva, Switzerland; and protesters took to the streets in Berlin,
Warsaw, Buenos Aires, Mexico City, Rome, Moscow, Barcelona, Milan,
Havana, Tokyo and Lisbon--not to mention across the U.S. But Judge Thayer
denied eight different requests for retrial put before him.

In a letter written to a friend from death row, Sacco wrote: "What I wish more
than all in this hour of agony is that our case and our fate may be
understood…and serve as a tremendous lesson to the forces of freedom--so
that our suffering and death will not have been in vain."

Vanzetti’s statement also is a testament to the impact the two men had: "If it
had not been for these things, I might have lived out my life talking at street
corners to scorning men. I might have died, unmarked, unknown, a failure.
Now we are not a failure. This is our career and our triumph. Never in our full
life could we hope to do such work for tolerance, for justice, for man’s
understanding of man as now we do by accident. Our words--our lives--our
pains--nothing! The taking of our lives--lives of a good shoemaker and a poor
fish-peddler--all! That last moment belongs to us--that agony is our triumph."


1) How does the Red Scare relate to the arrest and execution of
Sacco and Vanzetti?
2) Describe two ways in which the justice system was biased against
Sacco and Vanzetti. (Hint: judge,
jury, court procedures, etc.)

3) What lessons can be learned from this event?

Interpreting political cartoons - A lot can be said by making

historical analogies or comparisons.