You are on page 1of 1

16.5.

98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 151/9

Communities Ð the Court of First Instance (Third ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
Chamber), composed of V. Tiili, President, C. P. BrieÈt and of 24 March 1998
A. Potocki, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on
25 March 1998, the operative part of which is as follows: in Case T-232/97 Micheline Becret-Danieau and Others
v. European Parliament (1)
(Officials Ð Action for annulment Ð Remuneration
1. The application is dismissed as inadmissible. statements Ð Inadmissibility Ð Time-limits Ð New
substantial fact Ð Time-bar)
(98/C 151/19)
2. Each party is to bear its own costs.
(Language of the case: French)
(1) OJ C 7, 10.1.1998.
In Case T-232/97 Micheline Becret-Danieau, Jeremiah
Cadogan, Madeleine Mesenburg, Rainer Moriarty, Anne-
Marie Nilles, Teresa Rodrigues, Fernando Simoes, Jean-
Louis Spellini, Jeanne Pica-Borruto and Nicole Schulte,
officials of the Court of Justice of the European
Communities, residing respectively in Bertrange
ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Luxembourg), Steinsel (Luxembourg), Biwer
(Luxembourg), Colmar-Berg (Luxembourg), Mamer
(Second Chamber) (Luxembourg), Mondercange (Luxembourg), Munsbach
of 12 March 1998 (Luxembourg), Bascharage (Luxembourg), Thionville
(France) and Leudelange (Luxembourg), represented by
in Case T-207/97: Georges Berthu v. Council of the Jean-NoeÈl Louis, Ariane Tornel and FrancËoise Parmentier,
European Union (1) of the Brussels Bar, with an address for service at the
offices of Fiduciaire Myson sarl, 30 Rue de Cessange v.
(Economic and monetary policy Ð Council Regulation on the European Parliament (Agents: Manfred Peter and
certain provisions relating to the introduction of the euro Yannis Pantalis) Ð application for the annulment of the
Ð Replacement of the name ecu' provided for by express decisions rejecting the applicants' requests for
Article 109g of the EC Treaty by the name euro' Ð reimbursement of the sums deducted from their household
Action for annulment Ð Manifest inadmissibility) allowance pursuant to Article 67(2) of the Staff
(98/C 151/18) Regulations of officials of the European Communities on
the ground of the household grant received by their
spouses under the collective agreement covering
Luxembourg bank employees, and, so far as may be
(Language of the case: French)
necessary, of the decisions of 15 May and 27 July 1997
expressly rejecting their complaints, the Court of First
Instance (Second Chamber), composed of: A.
In Case T-207/97: Georges Berthu, Member of the Kalogeropoulos, President, C. W. Bellamy and J. Pirrung,
European Parliament, resident in Chelles (France), Judges; Registrar: H. Jung, made an order on 24 March
represented by Alexandre Varaut, of the Paris Bar, 9 Rue 1998, the operative part of which is as follows:
Alfred de Vigny, Paris, against Council of the European
Union (Agents: Jean-Paul Jacque and Ignacio Díez Parra)
Ð application for the annulment of Council Regulation 1. The application is dismissed as inadmissible.
(EC) No 1103/97 of 17 June on certain provisions relating
to the introduction of the euro (OJ L 162, 19.6.1997, p. 1) 2. The parties shall bear their own costs.
Ð the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber),
composed of A. Kalogeropoulos, President, C. W. Bellamy (1) OJ C 318, 18.10.1997.
and J. Pirrung, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order
on 12 March 1998, the operative part of which is as
follows:

1. The application is dismissed as manifestly


Action brought on 10 March 1998 by Emesa Sugar (Free
inadmissible.
Zone) NV against the Council of the European Union
(Case T-43/98)
2. The applicant is ordered to pay the costs. (98/C 151/20)

(1) OJ C 318, 18.10.1997. (Language of the case: Dutch)

An action against the Council of the European Union was


brought before the Court of First Instance of the European