You are on page 1of 2

C 234/6 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 25.7.

98

within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 58 proceedings pending before that court between Mr and
of the Treaty, in respect of the formation of public limited Mrs Robert Gilly and Directeur des Services Fiscaux du
liability companies and the maintenance and alteration of Bas-Rhin Ð on the interpretation of Articles 6, 48 and
their capital, with a view to making such safeguards 220 of the EC Treaty Ð the Court, composed of: G. C.
equivalent (OJ L 26 of 30.1.1977, p. 1), and on the Rodríguez Iglesias, President, M. Wathelet, (Rapporteur)
abusive exercise of a right arising from a provision of and R. Schintgen, (Presidents of Chambers), G. F.
Community law, the Court, composed of: G. C. Rodríguez Mancini, J. C. Moitinho de Almeida, P. J. G. Kapteyn, J. L.
Iglesias, President, C. Gulmann, H. Ragnemalm and M. Murray, J.-P. Puissochet, G. Hirsch, L. Sevón and K. M.
Wathelet (Presidents of Chambers), G. F. Mancini, J. C. Ioannou, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate
Moitinho de Almeida, P. J. G. Kapteyn, (Rapporteur), J. L. General; H. A. Rühl, Principal Administrator, for the
Murray, D. A. O. Edward, J.-P. Puissochet, G. Hirsch, P. Registrar, has given a judgment on 12 May 1998, in
Jann and L. Sevón, Judges; G. Tesauro, Advocate General; which it has ruled:
H. A. Rühl, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has
given a judgment on 12 May 1998, in which it has ruled: 1. The second indent of Article 220 of the EC Treaty
does not have direct effect.
Community law does not preclude national courts from
applying a provision of national law in order to assess 2. On a proper construction, Article 48 of the EC Treaty
whether a right arising from a provision of Community does not preclude the application of provisions such as
law is being exercised abusively. However, where such an those in Articles 13(5)(a), 14(1) and 16 of the
assessment is made, a shareholder relying on Article 25(1) Convention signed in Paris on 21 July 1959 between
of the Second Council Directive 77/91/EEC of the French Republic and the Federal Republic of
13 December 1976 on coordination of safeguards which, Germany for the avoidance of double taxation, as
for the protection of the interests of members and others, amended by the protocols signed in Bonn on 9 June
are required by Member States of companies within the 1969 and 28 September 1989, under which the tax
meaning of the second paragraph of Article 58 of the regime applicable to frontier workers differs depending
Treaty, in respect of the formation of public limited on whether they work in the private sector or the
liability companies and the maintenance and alteration of public sector and, where they work in the public
their capital, with a view to making such safeguards sector, on whether or not they have only the
equivalent, cannot be deemed to be abusing the right nationality of the State of the authority employing
arising from that provision merely because the increase in them, and the regime applicable to teachers differs
capital contested by him has resolved the financial depending on whether their residence in the State in
difficulties threatening the existence of the company which they are teaching is for a short period or not.
concerned and has clearly ensured to his economic benefit,
or because he has not exercised his preferential right under 3. On a proper construction, Article 48 of the Treaty
Article 29(1) of that directive to acquire new shares issued does not preclude the application of a tax credit
on the increase in capital at issue. mechanism such as that provided for in
Article 20(2)(a)(cc) of the said convention.
(1) OJ C 40 of 8.2.1997.
(1) OJ C 370 of 7.12.1996.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
of 12 May 1998 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Third Chamber)
in Case C-336/96 (reference for a preliminary ruling from
the Tribunal Administratif, Strasbourg): Mr and Mrs of 14 May 1998
Robert Gilly v Directeur des Services Fiscaux du Bas-
in Case C-48/96 P: Windpark Groothusen GmbH & Co.
Rhin (1)
Betriebs KG v Commission of the European
(Articles 6, 48 and 220 of the EC Treaty Ð Equal Communities (1)
treatment Ð Bilateral convention for the avoidance of
(Appeal Ð Financial support in the energy sector Ð
double taxation Ð Frontier workers)
Thermie programme Ð Right to full legal protection Ð
(98/C 234/10) Duty to state reasons Ð Right to a hearing Ð Discretion)
(98/C 234/11)
(Language of the case: French)
(Language of the case: German)
(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be
published in the European Court Reports) (Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be
published in the European Court Reports)
In Case C-336/96: reference to the Court under Article 177
of the EC Treaty from the Tribunal Administratif, In Case C-48/96 P: Windpark Groothusen GmbH & Co.
Strasbourg, France, for a preliminary ruling in the Betriebs KG, a company governed by German law,
25.7.98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 234/7

established at Groothusen-Krummhörn (Germany), President of the Chamber, R. Schintgen, G. F. Mancini and
represented by Professor Detlef Schumacher, Bremen, and G. Hirsch (Rapporteur) Judges, M. B. Elmer, Advocate
Benno Grunewald, Rechtsanwalt, Bremen Ð appeal General; H. von Holstein, Deputy Registrar, has given a
against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First judgment on 14 May 1998, in which it:
Chamber) of 13 December 1995 in Case T-109/94
Windpark Groothusen v Commission [1995] ECR II-3007, 1. Sets aside points 1, 2 and 4 of the operative part of
seeking to have that judgment set aside, the other party to the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the
the proceedings being Commission of the European European Communities of 26 June 1996 in Case T-91/
Communities, represented by Jürgen Grunwald Ð the 95 De Nil and Impens v Council;
Court (Third Chamber), composed of: C. Gulmann,
President of Chamber, J. C. Moitinho de Almeida,
(Rapporteur) and J.-P. Puissochet, Judges; G. Cosmas, 2. Dismisses the applicants' claim for compensation for
Advocate General; H. A. Rühl, Principal Administrator, non-material damage;
for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 14 May 1998,
in which it: 3. Refers the case back to the Court of First Instance for
judgment on the applicants' claim for compensation
for material damage;
1. Dismisses the appeal;
4. Reserves the costs.
2. Orders the appellant to pay the costs.
(1) OJ C 269 of 14.9.1996.
( ) OJ C 108 of 13.4.1996.
1

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber)

(Sixth Chamber) of 14 May 1998

of 14 May 1998 in Case C-364/96 (reference for a preliminary ruling from
the Bezirksgericht für Handelssachen Wien): Verein für
in Case C-259/96 P: Council of the European Union v Konsumenteninformation v Österreichische Kreditversiche-
Lieve de Nil and Christiane Impens (1) rungs AG (1)
(Appeal Ð Officials Ð Internal competition Ð Measures (Directive 90/314/EEC on package travel, package
implementing a judgment annulling a decision Ð holidays and package tours Ð Extent of protection against
Promotion to a higher category following a competition the risk of the organiser's insolvency)
with no retroactive effect Ð Material and non-material
(98/C 234/13)
damage)
(98/C 234/12) (Language of the case: German)

(Language of the case: French) (Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be
published in the European Court Reports)

(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be In Case C-364/97: reference to the Court under Article 177
published in the European Court Reports) of the EC Treaty from the Bezirksgericht für
Handelssachen Wien for a preliminary ruling in the
In Case C-259/96 P: appeal by the Council of the proceedings pending before that court between Verein für
European Union (Agents: Jean-Paul JacqueÂ, Diego Canga Konsumenteninformation und Österreichische Kreditversi-
Fano and TheÂreÁse Blanchet) against the judgment of the cherungs AG Ð on the interpretation of Council Directive
Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 26 June 1996 90/314/EEC of 13 June 1990 on package travel, package
in Case T-91/95 De Nil and Impens v Council [1996] holidays and package tours (OJ L 158 of 23.6.1990,
ECR-SC II-959, seeking to have that judgment set aside, p. 59), the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: C.
the other parties to the proceedings being Lieve de Nil, an Gulmann, (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, M.
official of the European Union, residing in Wolvertem Wathelet, J. C. Moitinho de Almeida, J.-P. Puissochet and
(Belgium) and Christiane Impens, an official of the L. Sevón, Judges; G. Tesauro, Advocate General;
Council of the European Union, residing in Brussels, L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has
represented by Jean-NoeÈl Louis, Thierry Demaseure, given a judgment on 14 May 1998, in which it has ruled:
VeÂronique Leclercq and Ariane Tornel, of the Brussels Bar,
with an address for service in Luxembourg at the offices Article 7 of Council Directive 90/314/EEC of 13 June
of Fiduciaire Myson SARL, 30 Rue de Cessange, the 1990 on package travel, package holidays and package
Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: H. Ragnemalm, tours is to be interpreted as covering, as security for the