You are on page 1of 1

C 299/30 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 26.9.

98

Duchy of Luxembourg and the French Republic have Pleas in law and main arguments adduced in support:
failed to fulfil their obligations under that Directive;
The pleas in law and main arguments are analogous to
those put forward in Case C-311/98 (2).
Ð order the Kingdom of Belgium, the Grand Duchy of
Luxembourg and the French Republic respectively to (1) OJ L 280, 29.10.1994, p. 83.
pay the costs. (2) See page 29 of this Official Journal.

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
of 14 July 1998 (Third Chamber, extended composition)
in Case T-119/95: Alfred Hauer v. Council of the
European Union and Commission of the European of 16 July 1998
Communities (1)
in Case T-109/96: Gilberte Gebhard v. European
(Action for annulment Ð Regulation (EEC) No 816/92 Ð Parliament (1)
Time limit for bringing proceedings Ð Admissibility Ð
Action for damages Ð Common organisation of the (Officials Ð Auxiliary staff Ð Auxiliary session
market in milk and milk products Ð Reference quantities interpreters of the European Parliament Ð Legality of
Ð Additional levy Ð Reduction of reference quantities levying Community tax on their remuneration)
without compensation)
(98/C 299/48)
(98/C 299/47)

(Language of the case: German)
(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-119/95: Alfred Hauer, residing in Niederweiler
(Germany), represented by FrancËois, Neuhaus & Co., with
an address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of
In Case T-109/96: Gilberte Gebhard, conference
Annick Wurth, 100 Boulevard de la PeÂtrusse v. the
interpreter, residing in Heidelberg (Germany), represented
Council of the European Union (Agent: Arthur Brautigam)
by Thierry Schmitt and Pierre Soler-Couteaux, of the
and the Commission of the European Communities
Strasbourg Bar, against European Parliament (Agents:
(Agent: Klaus-Dieter Borchardt) Ð application for
Manfred Peter, Didier Petersheim and JoaÄo Sant'Anna) Ð
annulment of Council Regulation (EEC) No 816/92 of
application for reimbursement of Community tax levied
31 March 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 804/68
on two payments of remuneration to the applicant Ð the
on the common organisation of the market in milk and
Court of First Instance (Third Chamber, extended
milk products (2) and for compensation for the damage
composition), composed of: V. Tiili, President, C. P. BrieÈt,
suffered as a result of the application of that Regulation
K. Lenaerts, A. Potocki and J. D. Cooke, Judges; A. Mair,
Ð the Court (First Chamber), composed of: B. Vesterdorf,
Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on
President, C. W. Bellamy and R. M. Moura Ramos,
16 July 1998, in which it:
Judges; A. Mair, Administrator, for the Registrar, has
given a judgment on 14 July 1998, in which it:

1. dismisses the claim for annulment as inadmissible; 1. dismisses the application;

2. dismisses the claim for compensation as unfounded;
2. orders the parties to bear their own costs.
3. orders the applicant to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 294, 5.10.1996.
(1) OJ C 208, 12.8.1995.
(2) OJ L 86, 1.4.1992, p. 83.