March 30 2007

Keswick, On. L4P 2P8
1

Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom
CANADA IS FOUNDED ON PRINCIPLES THAT RECOGNIZES THE SUPREMACY OF GOD AND THE RULE OF LAW
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect. 31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority. 32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province. 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

Re: Constitution Act, 1982 Non Compliance File 06-COM-0485 Dear Sheldon Prior

FOR THE RECORD

On September 5 2006 I sent Deputy Chief Bruce Herridge of the York Regional Police a copy of the 271 page Black BOOK requesting he read it with the intent to review YRP decision not to deal with my concerns which began at the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal on June 30 2005. On October 17 2006 I received a letter from Inspector Karen Knoakes, #440, Executive Officer of the York Regional Police dated October 13 2006 (pages 7 & 8) wherein Karen states that since receiving the Black Book she had received a prodigious amount of documentation related to my correspondence with a large number of government agencies where I expressed my dissatisfaction with the way my case has been handled by all levels of government and then mentions throughout the entirety of my writings I referred to my business dealings with Don Wilson and the Tenant Protection Act issues with Don Wilson who I indicate defrauded me of a considerable amount of money. Then blah blah blah and then my complaint is deemed to be a civil matter and she will not be taking any further action, She stated that I could request a review with your office within 30 days of receiving her letter. She was quite helpful in this matter but obviously and absolutely incoherent to the issues addressed.

franklyone@h otmail.com

LAWYER FILE # 10

From: Frank Gallagher 34 Riverglen Drive

Fax: 1-888-311-7555 To: Ontario Civilian Commission On Police Services Sheldon Prior

On November 15 2006 I drove down to your office to file a complaint against the York Regional Police (See pages 4-8) You responded January 3 2007 (See page 9) to state you had reviewed my complaint against the YRP and found there wasn’t sufficient grounds or reason to change the decision made by the YRP. Case closed.

I am one of those individuals referred to in Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms under the Constitution Act, 1982
Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law:

1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it
subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.

7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice. (THAT’s the BAD GUYS)
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

With all the documentation I have provided you and all the other people I have addressed in all levels of government I have informed you people of that which we people of Canada expect from the people in all levels of governments which we finance for the benefit of a moral society. You are all people too so it really shouldn’t be all that difficult to understand the concept inferred in the very first statement in the Charter “principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law” These words fit like a glove together when used with MORAL COMMON SENSE which is stated and implied. Canada is a country of human beings who are known to do some of the damndest things to each other so the CONSTITUTION (document) declares that is forbidden so there must be consistent MORAL COMMON SENSE ENFORCEMENT to back it. CONSTITUTION (establishment) Who would argue that? Not one sane person in society would openly state differently because they would be admitting their immoral inclination which would be a rather insane thing to do especially if you were employed in the establishment Having said that Considering the fact that you people that I have addressed are all employed in the establishment and more particularly in vital roles of enforcement which holds the foundation of the Constitution together it is mandatory that you people be consistently sane with moral common sense. Who would argue that?

That is correct. The truly insane and I offer the evidence in Lawyer Files #s 1-10 to identify some of them.
2

This document is Lawyer File # 10 and copies of Lawyer Files #s 1-9 will follow immediately for your review and I urge you to think, for the people of Canada desperately need you to act sanely and competently in the spirit of the Constitution, THE SUPREME LAW OF CANADA for them. Thank you Frank Gallagher

3

November 15 2006 To: Ontario Civilian Commission on Police Services 25 Grosvenor Street, 1st Floor Toronto, Ontario M7A 1Y6 From: Frank Gallagher 34 Riverglen Drive Keswick, On L4P 2P8 905-476-8959 Re: Letter from YRP dated October 13 2006 (Received October 17 2006) from Karen Noakes (pages4 & 5) Dear Commission I hereby request a review of my complaint filed with the York Regional Police as per pages 4 and 5 attached. On page 2 I have listed the documents I have provided to the YRP regarding charges to be laid against my former tenant Don Wilson, President, Director etal of Bio-Safe. Due to the fact the ORHT and the Investigations and Enforcement Unit of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing declined to file charges against Don Wilson for filing a false and misleading information under section 206 (2) of the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 namely his dispute dated June 10 2005, I requested the York Regional Police to deal with this matter. During the course of the Tribunal hearing Don Wilson also committed Fraud under the criminal code by denying having ever seen or signed two agreements which I submitted as evidence dated April 13 2005 and May 6 2005. He had signed these agreements with a signature other than the one he has used on all other documents he has signed with me. The YRP declined to deal with this. The Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Honourable John Gerretsen has also declined to deal with this.

4

I have requested that the ORHT, Dave Grech of Investigations and Enforcement and the Minister John Gerretsen be charged under section 206 (1) 6 i..under the Tenant Protection Act, 1997. 206 (1) Any person who knowingly does any of the following 6. Harass, hinder, obstruct or interfere with a landlord in the exercise of, i. securing a right or seeking relief under the Act or in the court

I have listed the documents which were provided to the York Regional Police on page 3 and I have attached these documents for your review. I have also provided you with a copy of the recording of the Tribunal hearing on June 28 2005. Parts of the hearing have been removed where the judicator said there is a law against Don Wilson’s fraudulent actions. There was no recording of the second day of the hearing. I have requested that this be investigated. Please sign below to acknowledge receipt of these documents and provide me a copy.. Thank you

Frank Gallagher

Date

Representative of Civilian Commission

Date

5

October 8 2006 Charges Tribunal Hearing June 10 2005

Toronto Sun Request charges under Tenant Protection Act Commentary/evidence Don Wilson Dispute False and misleading information)

Page 10 11-13 37-38

He submits matters dealing with corporation shares May 6 2005 April 13 2005 February 11 2004 February 11 2004 March 5 2005 August 8 2005 Agreement Agreement FRAUD FRAUD 27-30 31-36 39-41 42 43 44-45 60-62 63-68 72-73 69-71

Frank Gallagher Investor Agrement Deposit transaction Bio-Safe $30,000 Canceled cheque to Don Wilson $10,000 Midge Certificate 2,800,000 shares $7000 Purchase agreement Order under section 69 Tenant Protection Act, 1997 Investigations and Enforcement

August 10-September 6 2005 September 26 2006

Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing

September 30 2005 ORHT return my request for charges

Documents to York Regional Police May 31 2005 Ombudsman Correspondence with YRP September 1 2006 October 8 2006 October 18 2006 BLACK BOOK To: Toronto Sun Correspondence YRP Decline to charge 55 pages 59 pages 271 pages 73 pages 15 pages

6

7

8

9

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful