You are on page 1of 1

10.4.

1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 100/21

protection of legitimate expectations and of the duty to The complaint relates to the following conduct:
have inasmuch as he was refused promotion in 1998
despite the fact that, by virtue of his name having already
been entered on the list of officials most deserving of Ð concertation between PSA and its concessionaires at
promotion in 1997, his entitlement to promotion should national and local level with a view to impeding
have been given priority over that of other officials. parallel imports;

Ð obstruction of supplies by the exertion of pressure of


He also pleads infringement of Article 45(1) of the Staff foreign concessionaires to dissuade them from
Regulations, inasmuch as the appointing authority did not supplying vehicles to end-users domiciled in France;
undertake, in a reasonable and duly justified way, an
examination of the comparative merits of the eligible
candidates. Ð use of the so-called model-year date' sales technique;
and

Ð the existence of measures accompanying so-called


Balladur' State premiums.

The applicant considers that the Commission failed, both


Action brought on 25 January 1999 by Garage Trabisco in its summary of the complaint and in the presentation of
SA against the Commission of the European Communities its statement of reasons, with a view to justifying the lack
of a sufficient Community interest, to demonstrate the
(Case T-26/99) partitioning of the markets and the obstruction of
(1999/C 100/40) supplies, such as the concerted efforts made to prevent
access to the parallel imports market by the misuse of
the national proedures. Consequently, the defendant
institution has failed to fulfil its obligations relating to the
(Language of the case: French) examination of complaints submitted in competition
matters.

An action against the Commission of the European


Communities was brought before the Court of First
Instance of the European Communities on 25 January
1999 by Garage Trabisco SA, established at Cognac
(France), represented by Jean Claude Fourgoux, of the
Paris Bar,with an address for service in Luxembourg at the
Chambers of Pierrot Schiltz, 4 Rue BeÂatrix de Bourbon. Action brought on 25 January 1999 by Sigma Tecnologie
di Rivestimento SRL against the Commission of the
European Communities
(Case T-28/99)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
(1999/C 100/41)

Ð annul the decision of the Commission of 16/ (Language of the case: Italian)
17 November 1998;

An action against the Commission of the European


Ð order the Commission to pay the costs. Communities was brought before the Court of First
Instance of the European Communities on 25 January
1999 by Sigma Tecnologie di Rivestimento SRL, whose
registered office is in Lonato (Italy), represented by
Pleas in law and main arguments adduced in support Aurelio Pappalardo, of the Trapani Bar, and Massimo
Merola, of the Rome Bar, with an adress for service in
Luxembourg at the Chambers of Alain Lorang, Rue
Albert 1er 51.
By its action, the applicant company contests the decision
of the Commission rejecting the complaint lodged by it
concerning the steps taken by the Peugeot Group (PSA) The applicant claims that the Court should:
and certain of its concessionaires to impede its activities as
an independent agent/reseller, pursuant to an illegal
agreement between PSA and its concessionaires covering Ð annul Article 1 of Commission Decision K(1998) 3117
the whole of the territory of France. final of 21 October 1998 (Case IV/35.691/E-4