This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

David Johns and Ken Martin University of Toronto (johns@eecg.toronto.edu) (martin@eecg.toronto.edu)

University of Toronto

1 of 55

© D. Johns, K. Martin, 1997

Interference Noise

• Unwanted interaction between circuit and outside world • May or may not be random • Examples: power supply noise, capacitive coupling Improvement by ... • Reduced by careful wiring or layout

• These notes do not deal with interference noise.

University of Toronto

2 of 55

© D. Johns, K. Martin, 1997

Inherent Noise

• Random noise — can be reduced but NEVER eliminated • Examples: thermal, shot, and flicker Improvement by ... • Not strongly affected by wiring or layout • Reduced by proper circuit DESIGN.

• These notes discuss noise analysis and inherent noise sources.

University of Toronto

3 of 55

© D. Johns, K. Martin, 1997

**Time-Domain Analysis
**

0.4 0.3

0.2

v n(t)

(volts)

0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

time (seconds)

• Assume all noise signals have zero mean

University of Toronto

4 of 55

© D. Johns, K. Martin, 1997

RMS Value

1 2 V n ( rms ) ≡ -- ∫ v n(t)dt T

0 T 1⁄2

(1)

• T — suitable averaging time interval • Indicates normalized noise power. • If v n(t) applied to 1Ω resistor, average power dissipated, P diss ,

V n ( rms ) 2 P diss = ----------------- = V n ( rms ) 1Ω

2

(2)

University of Toronto

5 of 55

© D. Johns, K. Martin, 1997

Martin.= 20 log ----------------2 V n ( rms ) V n ( rms ) 2 2 (4) • When mean-squared values of noise and signal are same. SNR = 0dB . 1997 . Johns.SNR signal power SNR ≡ 10 log -----------------------------noise power 2 (3) • If signal node has normalized signal power of V x ( rms ) . University of Toronto 6 of 55 © D. V x ( rms ) V x ( rms ) SNR = 10 log ----------------. K. and noise power of V n ( rms ) .

Johns. all power levels referenced 1mW.Units of dBm • Often useful to know signal’s power in dB on absolute scale. can reference it to 75 Ω resistor University of Toronto 7 of 55 © D. K. • 1mW signal corresponds to 0 dBm • 1 µW signal corresponds to -30dBm What if only voltage measured (not power)? • If voltage measured — reference level to equiv power dissipated if voltage applied to 50 Ω resistor • Also. Martin. • With dBm. 1997 .

dBm Example • Find rms voltage of 0 dBm signal ( 50Ω reference) • What is level in dBm of a 2 volt rms signal? • 0 dBm signal (50 Ω reference) implies V ( rms ) = ( 50Ω ) × 1mW = 0. K. 1997 2 .2236 (5) • Thus.0 20 × log --------------. Johns. Martin. = 19 dBm 0.2236 (6) • Would dissipate 2 ⁄ 50 = 80 mW across a 50Ω resistor • 80 mW corresponds to 10 log ( 80 ) = 19 dBm University of Toronto 8 of 55 © D. a 2 volt (rms) signal corresponds to 2.

1997 . K. Johns.∫ v n1(t)v n2(t)dt T 0 T University of Toronto 9 of 55 © D.∫ [ v n1(t) + v n2(t) ] dt T 2 V no ( rms ) = 2 V n1 ( rms ) + 2 V n2 ( rms ) + 2 -.Noise Summation v n1(t) v n2(t) + v no(t) - i no(t) i n1(t) i n2(t) Voltage v no(t) = v n1(t) + v n2(t) T 0 Current (7) (8) (9) 2 2 1 V no ( rms ) = -. Martin.

1 -. Johns. C . Martin.∫ v n1(t)v n2(t)dt T 0 C ≡ -----------------------------------------V n1 ( rms ) V n2 ( rms ) V no ( rms ) = V n1 ( rms ) + V n2 ( rms ) + 2CV n1 ( rms ) V n2 ( rms ) 2 2 2 T (10) (11) • Correlation always satisfies – 1 ≤ C ≤ 1 • C = +1 — fully-correlated in-phase (0 degrees) • C = -1 — fully-correlated out-of-phase (180 degrees) • C = 0 — uncorrelated (90 degrees) University of Toronto 10 of 55 © D. 1997 . K.Correlation • Last term relates correlation between two signals • Define correlation coefficient.

rms values add linearly (aligned vectors) University of Toronto 11 of 55 © D. Johns. K. Martin.Uncorrelated Signals • In case of two uncorrelated signals. mean-squared value of sum given by V no ( rms ) = V n1 ( rms ) + V n2 ( rms ) 2 2 2 (12) • Two rms values add as though they were vectors at right angles When fully correlated V no ( rms ) = ( V n1 ( rms ) ± V n2 ( rms ) ) 2 2 (13) • sign is determined by whether signals are in or out of phase • Here. 1997 .

reducing by 13%)! Important Moral • To reduce overall noise. Martin. Johns. then V no ( rms ) = ( 10 + 5 ) = 125 2 2 2 (14) which results in V no ( rms ) = 11. 1997 .e. concentrate on large noise signals.Noise Summation Example • V n1 ( rms ) = 10µV .2µV . • Note that eliminating V n2 ( rms ) noise source same as reducing V n1 ( rms ) = 8. V n2 ( rms ) = 5µV . University of Toronto 12 of 55 © D.7 µV (i. K.

Frequency-Domain Analysis • With deterministic signals. frequency-domain techniques are useful. Martin. University of Toronto 13 of 55 © D. Johns. K. • Same true for dealing with random signals like noise. • This section presents frequency-domain techniques for dealing with noise (or random) signals. 1997 .

Martin.0 0.10 Hz 1. Johns. 1997 .1 1.1 1.0 0.Spectral Density V n(f) 1000 2 100 ( µV ) -------------. University of Toronto 14 of 55 © D.0 10 100 1000 2 V n(f) log ( f ) ( Hz ) 31. • Random signals have their power spread out over the frequency spectrum.0 10 100 log ( f ) ( Hz ) Spectral Density Root-Spectral Density • Periodic waveforms have their power at distinct frequencies.16 1.6 µV 10 ---------Hz 3. K.

Martin. Johns.e.Spectral Density V n(f) • Average normalized power over a 1 hertz bandwidth • Units are volts-squared/hertz Root-Spectral Density V n(f) • Square root of vertical axis (freq axis unchanged) • Units are volts/root-hertz (i. K. all power at positive frequencies) University of Toronto 15 of 55 © D.e. 1997 . Total Power V n ( rms ) = ∫ V n(f)df 0 2 ∞ 2 2 Spectral Density (15) • Above is a one-sided definition (i. V ⁄ Hz ).

Johns.Root-Spectral Density Example 31. measured rms 10 × 30 = 300 µV (16) (17) • If measurement used RBW = 0. K. 1997 .1 Hz. Martin.0 10 100 log ( f ) ( Hz ) • Around 100 Hz.0 ---------- Hz 0.1 = 1 µV University of Toronto 16 of 55 © D. V n(f) = 10 µV ⁄ Hz • If measurement used RBW = 30 Hz .16 µV 1. measured rms 10 × 0.1 1.6 10 V n(f) 3.

White Noise V n(f) µV ---------- Hz 10 3.0 0.2 ---------Hz log f ( Hz ) • Noise signal is “white” if a constant spectral density V n(f) = V nw (18) where V nw is a constant value University of Toronto 17 of 55 © D. Johns.1 1. Martin. K. 1997 .2 1.0 10 100 1000 µV V n(f) = V nw = 3.

2 1. 1997 .1/f Noise V n(f) µV ---------- 10 Hz 3.+ ( 1 × 10 ) f –6 2 1/f noise dominates 10 2 white noise dominates 100 1000 2 log f V n(f) = k v ⁄ f (k v is a constant) (19) • In terms of root-spectral density V n(f) = k v ⁄ f (20) Falls off at -10 db/decade due to f • Also called flicker or pink noise. Martin.2 × 10 ) –6 2 ≈ ------------------------------. University of Toronto 18 of 55 © D.0 – 10 dB/decade 1 ⁄ f noise corner 2 V n(f) ( 3.1 1.0 0. Johns. K.

1997 . Johns. Martin. • Total output mean-squared value is 2 V no ( rms ) ∞ = ∫ A(j2πf) 0 2 2 V ni(f)df (21) University of Toronto 19 of 55 © D. K.Filtered Noise V ni(f) 2 A(s) V no(f) = A(j2πf) V ni(f) V no(f) = A(j2πf) V ni(f) 2 2 2 • Output only a function of magnitude of transfer-function and not its phase • Can always apply an allpass filter without affecting noise performance.

1997 . Martin.0 10 100 10 3 10 4 log f 10 4 log f University of Toronto 20 of 55 © D.0 10 100 10 3 – 20 1.Noise Example V ni(f) nV ---------- 20 Hz 3 4 1.0 10 100 10 10 R = 1kΩ V ni(f) log f 1 f o = -------------2πRC V no(f) C = 0. K.159µF A(j2πf) ( dB ) 0 1 A(s) = -------------------s 1 + ---------2πf o f o = 10 3 V no(f) nV ---------- Hz 20 2 1. Johns.

1997 . V no(f) .3 µV rms ) 2 (23) • For the filtered signal.3 µV rms ) 2 7 2 2 (22) • Note: for this simple case. K.Noise Example • From dc to 100 kHz of input signal 2 V ni ( rms ) 10 0 5 = ∫ 20 df = 4 × 10 ( nV ) = ( 6. 2 V ni ( rms ) = 20 nV ⁄ Hz × 100kHz = ( 6. Johns. 2 1+ f o –9 (24) University of Toronto 21 of 55 © D. 20 × 10 V no(f) = ------------------------f --. Martin.

79 µV rms ) 5 2 2 (25) • Noise rms value of V no(f) is almost 1 ⁄ 10 that of V ni(f) since high frequency noise above 1kHz was filtered.24 × 10 ( nV ) = ( 0.df = 20 f o atan --. Martin. 1997 .Noise Example • Between dc and 100kHz 2 2 20 f V no ( rms ) = ∫ --------------------. K. • Don’t design for larger bandwidths than required otherwise noise performance suffers. University of Toronto 22 of 55 © D. Johns. 0 1+ 0 f o 10 5 2 10 5 = 6. f 2 f o --.

K. 2. Johns.Sum of Filtered Noise V n1(f) A 1(s) A 2(s) A 3(s) V no(f) uncorrelated noise sources V n2(f) V n3(f) • If filter inputs are uncorrelated. 1997 . filter outputs are also uncorrelated • Can show 2 V no(f) = i = 1. 3 ∑ A i(j2πf) 2 2 V ni(f) (26) University of Toronto 23 of 55 © D. Martin.

1997 . Johns.Noise Bandwidth • Equal to the frequency span of a brickwall filter having the same output noise rms value when white noise is applied to each Example A(j2πf) 0 ( dB ) – 20 fo -------100 fo ----10 – 20 dB/decade 0 ( dB ) – 20 A brick(j2πf) log f fo 10f o log f fo -------100 fo ----10 fo π f x = -.f o - π 2 University of Toronto 24 of 55 © D. Martin.f o 2 • Noise bandwidth of a 1’st-order filter is -. K.

Johns. Martin.× 10 2 (28) 25 of 55 © D.Noise Bandwidth • Advantage — total output noise is easily calculated for white noise input. • If spectral density is V nw volts/root-Hz and noise bandwidth is f x . 1997 . then V no ( rms ) = V nw f x 2 2 (27) Example • A white noise input of 100 nV/ Hz applied to a 1’st order filter with 3 dB frequency of 1 MHz V no ( rms ) = 100 × 10 V no ( rms ) = 125 µV University of Toronto –9 6 π × -. K.

1/f Noise Tangent Principle • Method to determine the frequency region(s) that contributes the dominant noise • Lower a 1/f noise line until it touches the spectral density curve • The total noise can be approximated by the noise in the vicinity of the 1/f line • Works because a curve proportional to 1 ⁄ x results in equal power over each decade of frequency University of Toronto 26 of 55 © D. 1997 . Martin. Johns. K.

K. Martin.1/f Tangent Example V no(f) 200 1/f curve 20 2 1 10 100 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 Frequency (Hz) N1 N2 N3 N4 • Consider root-spectral noise density shown above University of Toronto 27 of 55 © D. Johns. 1997 .

-= 1.84 × 10 ( nV ) f 1 2 N2 10 4 100 (29) 10 3 = ∫ 20 df = 20 f 100 = 3. 10 – ( 200 ) ( 10 ) = 5. 2 ------.1/f Tangent Example 2 N1 2 100 2 5 2 200 = ∫ ----------df = 200 ln ( f ) 1 = 1. Martin.6 × 10 ( nV ) 100 2 2 10 4 2 2 10 3 5 2 (30) 2 N3 8 2 20 f 20 ------.df = ∫ ------------------------.df – ∫ 200 df f f ------.df = . K. 2 1 f 3 = ∫ --------------. Johns.33 × 10 ( nV ) 3 3 3 2 3 10 3 ( 10 ) 10 10 2 200 200 = ∫ ------------------------. 1997 .88 × 10 ( nV ) 2 University of Toronto ∞ 2 ∞ 2 10 4 (31) 2 N4 (32) 28 of 55 © D. 2 41 + 01+ 0 10 5 5 10 10 2 π 5 2 4 9 2 = 200 -.

Johns. University of Toronto 29 of 55 © D.1/f Tangent Example • The total output noise is estimated to be V no ( rms ) = 2 ( N1 2 N2 2 N3 2 1⁄2 N4 ) + + + = 77. then also sum that region. • Note: if noise curve is parallel to 1/f tangent for a wide range of frequencies. N 4 = 76... K. 1997 . Martin.7µV rms • Need only have found the noise in the vincinity where the 1/f tangent touches noise curve.5µV rms (33) (34) • But .

Johns. K. Martin. • Appears as white spectral density Shot Noise • Due to dc bias current being pulses of carriers • Dependent of dc bias current and is white. 1997 . University of Toronto 30 of 55 © D. Flicker Noise • Due to traps in semiconductors • Has a 1/f spectral density • Significant in MOS transistors at low frequencies.Noise Models for Circuit Elements • Three main sources of noise: Thermal Noise • Due to thermal excitation of charge carriers.

Resistor Noise • Thermal noise — white spectral density R R (noiseless) 2 V R(f) = 4kTR R (noiseless) 2 4kT I R(f) = -------R element models – 23 –1 • k is Boltzmann’s constant = 1. 1997 University of Toronto .38 × 10 JK • T is the temperature in degrees Kelvin • Can also write V R(f) = R ----. K. Johns.× 4. Martin.06 nV ⁄ Hz 1k for 27°C (35) 31 of 55 © D.

K.6 × 10 C • I D is the dc bias current through the diode University of Toronto 32 of 55 © D. Johns. Martin.Diodes • Shot noise — white spectral density kT r d = -------qI D 2 (noiseless) V d(f) = 2kTr d (forward-biased) kT r d = -------qI D (noiseless) I d(f) = 2qI D 2 element models – 19 • q is one electronic charge = 1. 1997 .

+ ------------. 2 f β(f) • V i(f) has base resistance thermal noise plus collector shot noise referred back • I i(f) has base shot noise. K. Johns. 1997 . base flicker noise plus collector shot noise referred back University of Toronto 33 of 55 © D.Bipolar Transistors • Shot noise of collector and base currents • Flicker noise due to base current • Thermal noise due to base resistance 2 V i (f) (noiseless) 2 1 V i (f) = 4kT r b + --------- 2g m (active-region) I i (f) 2 2 I i (f) element model IC KI B = 2q I B + -------. Martin.

K.m 3 element model University of Toronto 34 of 55 © D. 1997 . Johns. Martin.MOSFETS • Flicker noise at gate • Thermal noise in channel V g(f) 2 2 I d(f) (active-region) 2 K V g(f) = ------------------WLC ox f 2 I d(f) 2 g = 4kT -.

MOSFET Flicker (1/f) Noise 2 K V g(f) = ------------------WLC ox f (36) • K dependent on device characteristics. • 1/f noise is extremely important in MOSFET circuits as it can dominate at low-frequencies • Typically p-channel transistors have less noise since holes are less likely to be trapped. K. Johns. University of Toronto 35 of 55 © D. • W & L — Transistor’s width and length • C ox — gate-capacitance/unit area • Flicker noise is inversely proportional to the transistor area. WL . Martin. varies widely. 1997 .

MOSFET Thermal Noise • Due to resistive nature of channel • In triode region. Martin. noise would be I d(f) = ( 4kT ) ⁄ r ds where r ds is the channel resistance • In active region. channel is not homogeneous and total noise is found by integration 2 2 I d(f) = 4kT -- g m 3 2 (37) for the case V DS = V GS – V T University of Toronto 36 of 55 © D. K. 1997 . Johns.

• At high frequencies. 1997 . University of Toronto 37 of 55 © D. Johns. Martin.+ ------------------. K. gate current can be appreciable due to capacitive coupling. 3 g m WLC ox f model • Can lump thermal noise plus flicker noise as an input voltage noise source at low to moderate frequencies.Low-Moderate Frequency MOSFET Model V i (f) (noiseless) 2 (active-region) element 2 2 1 K V i (f) = 4kT -- ----.

all uncorrelated. 1997 . I n+(f) — values depend on opamp — typically. I n-(f). Johns. K. Martin.Opamps I n-(f) 2 (noiseless) 2 V n(f) 2 I n+(f) V n(f). element model • Modelled as 3 uncorrelated input-referred noise sources. • Current sources often ignored in MOSFET opamps University of Toronto 38 of 55 © D.

K.Why 3 Noise Sources? 2 V no(f) 2 V n(f) ignored ⇒ V no Actual V 2 = V 2 no n = 0 R V no(f) 2 I n-(f) ignored 2 2 ⇒ V no 2 = 2 Vn 2 Actual V no = V n + ( I n. Martin. Johns.R ) I n+(f) ignored Actual V no = 2 R V no(f) 2 2 2 ⇒ V no = V n 2 2 V n + ( I n+ R ) University of Toronto 39 of 55 © D. 1997 .

1997 . f o = ( 4kTR ) -. K. • Capacitor noise mean-squared value equals kT ⁄ C when connected to an arbitrary resistor value.. Martin. they accumulate noise. -------------- 2 2 2πRC 2 kT V no ( rms ) = ----C University of Toronto (38) 40 of 55 © D.. Johns. R R C 1 f 0 = -------------2πRC V R(f) = 4kTR V no(f) C • Noise bandwidth equals ( π ⁄ 2 )f o 2 2 π π 1 V no ( rms ) = V R(f) -.Capacitors • Capacitors and inductors do not generate any noise but .

K. University of Toronto 41 of 55 © D.8 µV rms 96 ⁄ 20 10 (39) • Therefore kT C = ---------------.Capacitor Noise Example • At 300 °K .6pF 2 V n(rms) (40) • This min capacitor size determines max resistance size to achieve a given time-constant. 1997 .= 15. • Noise allowed: 1V V n ( rms ) = -----------------. Johns. what capacitor size is needed to have 96dB dynamic range with 1 V rms signal levels.= 16. Martin.

• Can use “oversampling” to reduce effective noise. — an rms noise voltage of kT ⁄ C . • Does not depend on sampling rate and is independent from sample to sample.Sampled Signal Noise • Consider basic sample-and-hold circuit φ clk v in C v out • • When φ clk goes low. say 1000 times. Johns. Martin. 1997 . • Sample. and average results. noise as well as signal is held on C . University of Toronto 42 of 55 © D. K.

I nf and I n. K. Johns.Opamp Example R1 Cf Rf Cf I n1 I nf I nRf Vi Vo R2 R1 V n2 R2 V no(f) Vn I n+ circuit equivalent noise circuit • Use superposition — noise sources uncorrelated • Consider I n1. 1997 . Martin.causing V no1(f) 2 V no1(f) 2 = 2 ( I n1(f) + 2 I nf(f) + 2 I n-(f) ) 2 Rf -----------------------------1 + j2πfR f C f (41) University of Toronto 43 of 55 © D.

Opamp Example • Consider I n+. V n2 and V n causing V no2(f) 2 V no2(f) 2 2 Rf ⁄ R1 1 + -----------------------------1 + j2πfC f R f = 2 2 ( I n+(f)R 2 + 2 V n2(f) + 2 V n(f) ) (42) • If R f « R 1 then gain ≅ 1 for all freq and ideal opamp would result in infinite noise — practical opamp will lowpass filter noise at opamp f t . Johns. K. 1997 . • If R f » R 1 . Total noise: V no(rms) = V no1(rms) + V no2(rms) 2 2 2 (43) University of Toronto 44 of 55 © D. low freq gain ≅ R f ⁄ R 1 and f 3dB = 1 ⁄ ( 2πR f C f ) similar to noise at negative input — however. gain falls to unity until opamp f t . Martin.

and R 2 = 9.Numerical Example • Estimate total output noise rms value for a 10kHz lowpass filter when C f = 160pF . 1997 .406 pA ⁄ Hz I n1 = 1.6 pA ⁄ Hz opamp’s f t = 5 MHz . I n(f) = 0. R 1 = 10k . K. Martin. Johns. I nf = 0.2 nV ⁄ Hz (44) (45) (46) University of Toronto 45 of 55 © D.1k . • Assuming room temperature. • Assume V n(f) = 20 nV ⁄ Hz . R f = 100k .28 pA ⁄ Hz V n2 = 12.

2 V no1(rms) π⁄2 = ( 147 nV ⁄ Hz ) × ------------------------------------------------2π ( 100kΩ ) ( 160pF ) 2 = ( 18. Martin. K. Johns. V no1(0) = ( I n1(0) + I nf(0) + I n-(0) )R f 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 9 2 2 2 = ( 0. 1997 .4 µV ) 2 (48) University of Toronto 46 of 55 © D.Numerical Example • The low freq value of V no1(f) is found by f = 0 .28 + 0.406 + 1.6 ) ( 1 × 10 ) ( 100k ) = ( 147 nV ⁄ Hz ) 2 (47) • Since (41) indicates noise is first-order lowpass filtered. in (41).

6 µV ) University of Toronto 2 (50) 47 of 55 © D. Johns. 1997 .Numerical Example • For 2 V no2(0) 2 2 2 2 2 2 V no2(0) = ( I n+(f)R 2 + V n2(f) + V n(f) ) ( 1 + R f ⁄ R 1 ) = ( 24.1 nV ⁄ Hz ) × 11 = ( 265 nV ⁄ Hz ) 2 2 2 (49) • Noise is lowpass filtered at f o until f 1 = ( R f ⁄ R 1 )f o where the noise gain reaches unity until f t = 5MHz • Breaking noise into two portions. we have 2 V no2(rms) – 9 2 π π⁄2 = ( 265 × 10 ) ----------------. K.1 × 10 ) -.+ ( 24. Martin.( f t – f 1 ) 2πR C 2 f f –9 2 = ( 74.

Johns. K. • Note: R 2 contributes to output noise with its thermal noise AND amplifying opamp’s positive noise current. it should be eliminated in a low-noise circuit.Numerical Example • Total output noise is estimated to be V no(rms) = 2 V no1(rms) + 2 V no2(rms) = 77 µV rms (51) • Note: major noise source is opamp’s voltage noise. • To reduce total output noise — use a lower speed opamp — choose an opamp with a lower voltage noise. • If dc offset can be tolerated. University of Toronto 48 of 55 © D. 1997 . Martin.

1997 . Martin. University of Toronto 49 of 55 © D. K.CMOS Example • Look at noise in input stage of 2-stage CMOS opamp V n5 V dd Q5 V n2 V bias V n1 V in+ Q3 Q1 V n3 Q2 V n4 Q4 V inV no (output) V ss • Equivalent voltage noise sources used since example addresses low-moderate frequency. Johns.

= g m1 R o V n1 V n2 (52) where R o is the output impedance seen at V no .CMOS Example V no V no -------.= g m3 R o V n3 V n4 g m5 V no -------.= -------. 1997 . Martin. V no V no -------. K.= -------. University of Toronto 50 of 55 © D. Johns.= -----------2g m3 V n5 (53) (54) • Found by noting that V n5 modulates bias current and drain of Q 2 tracks that of Q 1 due to symmetry — this gain is small (compared to others) and is ignored.

-------. subsitute 2 2 1 V ni(f) = 4kT -- ------. + 16 kT -------. 1997 . - ----V neq(f) = ---- 3 g 3 g g m1 m1 m1 University of Toronto (58) 51 of 55 © D. Martin. g m1 2 (56) Thermal Noise Portion • For white noise portion. 3 g mi (57) g m3 1 1 16 kT -------.CMOS Example V no(f) = 2 ( g m1 R o ) V n1(f) + 2 ( g m3 R o ) V n3(f) 2 2 2 2 2 (55) • Find equiv input noise by dividing by g m1 R o g m3 2 2 2 V neq(f) = 2V n1(f) + 2V n3(f) -------. Johns. K.

• In other words. Martin. 1997 . 1/f Noise Portion • We make the following substitution into (56).CMOS Example • Assuming g m3 ⁄ g m1 is near unity. g m1 should be made as large as possible to minimize thermal noise contribution. ( W ⁄ L ) 1 µ p (59) (60) = 2 2V n1(f) University of Toronto 52 of 55 © D. Johns. K. g mi = 2 V ni(f) W 2µ i C ox ---- I Di Li + ( W ⁄ L ) 3 µ n 2 2V n3(f) ------------------------. near equal contribution of noise from the two pairs of transistors which is inversely proportional to g m1 .

------------. Martin. K. letting each of the noise sources have a spectral density 2 V ni(f) Ki = ---------------------W i L i C ox f (61) we have 2 V ni(f) µ n K 3 L 1 2 K1 = ---------. Johns.+ ----- ------------- 2 C ox f W 1 L 1 µ p W L 1 3 (62) • Recall first term is due to p-channel input transistors.CMOS Example • Now. 1997 . while second term is due to the n-channel loads University of Toronto 53 of 55 © D.

• Taking L 3 longer greatly helps due to the inverse squared relationship — this will limit the signal swings somewhat • The input noise is independent of W 3 and therefore one can make it large to maximize signal swing at the output. University of Toronto 54 of 55 © D. 1997 . K 3 > K 1 ).e. Martin. the noise of the n-channel loads dominate since µ n > µ p and typically n-channel transistors have larger 1/f noise than p-channels (i. Johns.CMOS Example Some points for low 1/f noise • For L 1 = L 3 . K.

Martin.CMOS Example Some points for low 1/f noise • Taking W 1 wider also helps to minimize 1/f noise (recall it helps white noise as well). 1997 . Johns. • Taking L 1 longer increases the noise due to the second term being dominant. K. University of Toronto 55 of 55 © D.

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot useful- Ampliﬁer Noise
- Noise Analysis and Modeling
- Solns_8
- z0409mf
- AD636
- 456-26659-0-T405
- eikma,elderlybalancestrategy.pdf
- Tiempo Promedio
- CLA50E1200HB - High Efficiency Thyristor
- Keithley Specs
- Datasheet
- Best Buy Triplett 9045 True RMS Digital Multimeter With Temperature, Capacitance and Frequency
- Assignment 2 (1)
- Comparing Transformer Derating Computed Using the Harmonic Loss Factor FHL and K-Facto
- Bearing
- Bearing
- Bearing
- EN-50160
- TRANSFORMER MODELING IN ATP EMTP
- AN1363-1_VNA
- PymolRef
- Bearing Selection
- Op-Amp
- pe1
- 09_op-amps
- Op-Amp
- Acoustics Electives
- ConSpec Apr90 Concert Halls
- Agilent Noise Figure Measurement
- m135 Manual
- 04 Noise

Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

We've moved you to where you read on your other device.

Get the full title to continue

Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

scribd