Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. What materials have been studied in literature? Structural or weld materials? Buying source
?
Welded N/A
Stainless Steel/Nickel
Structured, later Welded N/A
Aluminum
N/A N/A
Titanium, SS, Aluminum
(Review Paper)
Structured N/A
Stainless Steel
Structured N/A
Ti-6Al-4V
1.
https://www.allmetalsalesinc.com/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMI25LKopyw5QIVA18NCh2zSQ9oEAAYAiA
AEgIfpPD_BwE
2. http://www.goodfellow.com/E/Metals.html
3. https://www.advent-rm.com
4. http://www.researchalloys.com
2. What geometries were selected for printing ? Rationale behind these geometries?
Geometry Rationale
Materials
Dissimilar metal joint to investigate the mechanical
Stainless Steel/Nickel properties near the interface
between two kinds of weld
metal made by dissimilar
metal deposition
walls Cause residual stresses was
Aluminum investigated using neutron
diffraction and how vertical
inter pass rolling and side
rolling can be used to control
residual stress and
distortion.
Miscellaneous N/A
Titanium, SS, Aluminum
(Review Paper)
3 & 4. For each material - what wire operating conditions were used to make the parts ? What
microstructural effects did they observe? What property mappings did they do ? What
reasoning was given for the microstructural changes ?
Wire Operating Microstructural Effects Property Mappings
Material Conditions and reasonings
Stainless Current 140 A, Voltage mainly composed of Hardness was almost
Steel 20.6 V, FS 200 mm/min, austenite, and delta - same in the SS Weld
Wire Diameter 1.2 mm ferrite can be observed Area
slightly near the
austenite grain boundary
Mainly Dendritic
Nickel Current 140 A, Voltage Hardness was almost
24.2 V, FS 200 mm/min, same in the Nickel
Wire Diameter 1.2 mm Weld Area
For Nickel weld metal
Weld area area, austenite grain was Was slightly lower in
interface observed. For Steel weld weld area interface
metal area, grain size of
delta-ferrite was larger
than that of
metallographic structure
shown. This is mainly
caused by the heat effect
when Ni was deposited
6. If you were to select a set of materials to implement on RPI's WAAM setup - which ones
would you start with and what study would you want to run ? Explain how this would yield new
knowledge to the scientific community.
According to the literature review, Ti-6Al-4V have superior properties taking everything in
consideration so I would like to recommend that for implementing on RPI’s WAAM setup.
However, Ti-6AL-4V is a highly costly materials so not very wise to be used in initial small
research project. Also, post processing of Ti-6AL-4V might be tricky after WAAM as it’s a hard to
machine material. So, as a second choice, I would like to recommend Aluminum and its alloys to
be used in RPI’s WAAM setup because of its high machinability and cost effectiveness along
with other decent properties.
For processing materials to be used in biomedical application, WAAM can be a prospective
choice. However, most of the biomedical applications, precisely while dealing with implants,
need to have some common and must material properties like optimum cell adhesion and
proliferation, better corrosion resistance and proper fatigue characteristics to sustain for years
inside human body. Ti-6AL-4V or other titanium alloys processed by WAAM could be run
through all these (Cell attachment and proliferation, fatigue performance, corrosion resistance)
testing which would be an interesting study to examine. If that fails different criterion, the type
and pattern of the failure and reasons behind that have to be acknowledged and probable
solution model can be produced for the betterment of future biomedical research in
manufacturing field.
3. Invited review article: Strategies and processes for high quality wire arc additive
manufacturing
4. Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of maraging steel produced by
wire +arc additive manufacture process
5. The anisotropic corrosion behaviour of wire arc additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V alloy in
3.5% NaCl solution