You are on page 1of 1

26.4.

2003 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 101/51

Pleas in law and main arguments — annul the implied rejection of the applicant’s complaint
of 16 July 2002;
Trade mark concerned: QUICK-GRIP. — Application
No 1760867. — order the Commission to pay the costs even in the event
that the present application is dismissed.
Product or service: ‘Hand tools, clamps, c-clamps, bar
clamps, hold-down clamps, weld-
ing clamps, chain clamps, locking
bar clamps, locking hold-down
clamps, locking pipe clamps, pipe Pleas in law and main arguments
clamps, part and fittings for the
aforesaid goods’ in International
Class 8. In support of his arguments, the applicant alleges, first, lack of
a statement of reasons. The applicant claims furthermore that
Decision challenged Refusal of registration. the assessment of the comparative merits of the officials
before the Board of eligible for promotion was incorrect and that it was not carried
Appeal: out in relation to all the officials eligible for promotion.

Pleas in Law relied on: Incorrect application of


Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of the Regu-
lation No 40/94.

Action brought on 25 February 2003 by Fondation Alsace


against Commission of the European Communities

Action brought on 24 February 2003 by Georges Vassila- (Case T-65/03)


kis against Commission of the European Communities
(2003/C 101/89)
(Case T-62/03)
(Language of the case: French)
(2003/C 101/88)

(Language of the case: French)


An action against the Commission of the European Communi-
ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
European Communities on 25 February 2003 by Fondation
Alsace, whose registered office is at Strasbourg (France),
An action against the Commission of the European Communi- represented by François Ruhlmann, lawyer.
ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
European Communities on 24 February 2003 by Georges
Vassilakis, residing in Brussels, represented by Georgy Manalis,
The applicant claims that the Court should:
lawyer.

— annul the decision of the Commission of 20 December


The applicant claims that the Court should: 2002 or, in the alternative, the preceding decision related
to it;
— annul the decision of the Commission of the European
Communities, as the appointing authority, not to include — order the Commission to pay the Association Fondation
the applicant’s name in the list of officials promoted to Alsace EUR 3 000 by way of preparation allowance and
Grade A 5 in the 2002 exercise to promote officials from costs of proceedings;
one career to the next, as mentioned in Administrative
Information No 40-2002 of 17 May 2002; — order the European Commission to pay all the costs of
the proceedings.
— annul the list of officials promoted to A 5 in the 2002
exercise to promote officials from one career to the next, Alternatively:
as mentioned in Administrative Information No 40-2002
of 17 May 2002, insofar as it does not include the — grant the Association Fondation Alsace the longest period
applicant’s name; possible for payment.