You are on page 1of 2

10.5.

2003 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 112/17

Pleas in law and main arguments Action brought on 17 March 2003 by the Commission of
the European Communities against the Federal Republic
of Germany
France was required to transpose and apply the provision
referred to in the application with effect from 1 January 2000. (Case C-118/03)
It appears from the replies submitted of the French authorities
that, with the exception of numbers which are free of (2003/C 112/29)
charge (‘freephone numbers’) and of shared-cost numbers, the
remaining non-geographic numbers are not covered by the
measures which have been established.
An action against the Federal Republic of Germany was
brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communi-
( 1) Directive 97/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council ties on 17 March 2003 by the Commission of the European
of 30 June 1997 on interconnection in Telecommunications with Communities, represented by Ulrich Wölker, legal advisor, and
regard to ensuring universal service and interoperability through Hans Støvlbæk, of its legal service, with an address for service
application of the principles of Open Network Provision (ONP) in Luxembourg.
— OJ L 199, 26.7.1997, p. 32.
( 2) OJ L 268, 3.10.1998, p. 37.
The applicant claims that the Court should:

1. Declare that by failing to adopt the laws, regulations


and administrative provisions necessary to implement
Commission Directive 2000/37/EC ( 1) of 5 June 2000
amending Chapter VIa ‘Pharmacovigilance’ of Council
Directive 81/851/EEC on the approximation of the laws
of the Member States relating to veterinary medicinal
products or by failing to inform the Commission of those
Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunale di provisions, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to
Genova — Prima sezione civile by order of that Court of fulfil its obligations under that directive;
10 March 2003 in the civil proceedings brought by
Eco Eridania S.r.l. against Ministero dell’Ambiente and
2. Order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.
Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri

(Case C-115/03)
Pleas in law and main arguments

(2003/C 112/28) The period for implementing the directive expired on 5 Decem-
ber 2001.

(1 ) OJ L 139, 10.6.2000, p. 25.


Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the
European Communities by order of the Tribunale di Genova
— Prima sezione civile (Genoa District Court, First Civil
Chamber) of 10 March 2003, received at the Court Registry
on 17 March 2003, for a preliminary ruling in the civil
proceedings brought by Eco Eridania S.r.l. against Ministero
dell’Ambiente and Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri on the
following question: Action brought on 18 March 2003 by the Commission of
the European Communities against the French Republic

Does the obligation under Article 4 of Directive 91/689/ (Case C-119/03)


EEC ( 1) apply to all producers of hazardous waste (including
dental surgeons’ practices) or merely to producers of hazardous
(2003/C 112/30)
waste whose business is organised in the form of an undertak-
ing or institution?

An action against the French Republic was brought before the


( 1) OJ L 377 of 31.12.1991, p. 20. Court of Justice of the European Communities on 18 March
2003 by the Commission of the European Communities,
represented by G. Rozet, acting as Agent, with an address for
service in Luxembourg.
C 112/18 EN Official Journal of the European Union 10.5.2003

The Commission of the European Communities claims that Action brought on 19 March 2003 by the Commission of
the Court should: the European Communities against the French Republic

— declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations


and administrative provisions necessary to comply with (Case C-122/03)
Commission Directive 2000/52/EC of 26 July 2000 on
the transparency of financial relations between Member
States and public undertakings as well as on financial (2003/C 112/32)
transparency within certain undertakings (1) or, in any
event, by failing to notify them to the Commission,
France has failed to fulfil its obligations under that
directive;
An action against the French Republic was brought before the
— order France to pay the costs. Court of Justice of the European Communities on 19 March
2003 by the Commission of the European Communities,
represented by H. Støvlbæk and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents,
with an address for service in Luxembourg.
Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposition expired on 31 January The applicant claims that the Court should:
2001.
1. Declare that, by imposing, pursuant to Article R. 5142-
( 1) OJ L 193 of 29 July 2002, p. 78. 15 of the Public Health Code, on traders importing or
distributing in France medicinal products which are
already covered by a marketing authorisation for the
French or Community market the requirement that they
submit, at the request of the monitoring authorities,
either a certified copy issued by the French agency for
Action brought on 18 March 2003 by the Commission of health products sanitary safety (FAHPSS) of the French
the European Communities against the Kingdom of Spain marketing authorisation or of the registration of the
medicinal product, or a document issued by the FAHPSS
(Case C-120/03) attesting to the fact that the imported medicinal product
has obtained a marketing authorisation issued by the
(2003/C 112/31) European Community, the French Republic has failed to
fulfil its obligations under Article 28 of the EC Treaty;

An action against the Kingdom of Spain was brought before 2. Order the French Republic to pay the costs.
the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 18 March
2003 by the Commission of the European Communities,
represented by K. Banks and J.L. Buendía Sierra, acting as
Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.
Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant claims that the Court should:


So far as concerns the importation into France of pharmaceuti-
1. Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations
cal products already covered by a marketing authorisation for
and administrative provisions necessary to comply with
the French or Community market, Article R. 5142-15 of the
Directive 98/71/EC ( 1) of the European Parliament and of
Public Health Code requires the submission at the request of
the Council of 13 October 1998 on the legal protection
customs officers of either a certified copy of the marketing
of designs or, in any event, by failing to communicate
authorisation or of the registration of the medicinal product
them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has
or a document attesting to the fact that the imported medicinal
failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;
product has obtained a marketing authorisation issued by the
2. Order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. European Community, each of those documents being issued
by the FAHPSS.

Pleas in law and main arguments


The effects of that provision on traders wishing to import and
distribute pharmaceutical products in France may be resumed
The period prescribed for implementation of the directive as follows: (i) formalities, costs and the time entailed by the
expired on 28 October 2001. granting procedure are imposed on traders which they are
obliged to bear, on pain of sanctions, throughout its term; (ii)
( 1) OJEC L 289 of 28 October 1998, p. 28. those same traders are obliged to be constantly in possession
of documents which could be potentially numerous and
voluminous.