You are on page 1of 1

21.6.

2003 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 146/9

2. The calorific value of waste which is to be combusted is not a JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
relevant criterion for the purpose of determining whether that
operation constitutes a disposal operation as referred to in
point D10 of Annex IIA to Directive 75/442, as amended by (Sixth Chamber)
Directive 91/156 and by Decision 96/350, or a recovery
operation as referred to in point R1 of Annex IIB thereof.
Member States may establish distinguishing criteria for that of 8 May 2003
purpose, provided that those criteria comply with those laid
down in the Directive.
in Case C-171/01 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from
the Verfassungsgerichtshof): Wählergruppe ‘Gemeinsam
( 1) OJ C 161 of 2.6.2001. Zajedno/Birlikte Alternative und Grüne Gewerkschafter-
Innen/UG’ (1)

(EEC-Turkey Association — Freedom of movement for


workers — Article 10(1) of Decision No 1/80 of the
Association Council — Prohibition of discrimination as
regards conditions of work — Direct effect — Scope —
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT Legislation of a Member State excluding Turkish workers
from eligibility for election to a chamber of workers)
(Sixth Chamber)
(2003/C 146/15)
of 8 May 2003

in Case C-122/01 P: T. Port GmbH & Co. KG v Com- (Language of the case: German)
mission of the European Communities (1)
(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published
(Appeal — Bananas — Common organisation of the markets in the European Court Reports)
— Regulation (EC) No 478/95 — Export licence scheme —
Action for damages — Proof of damage and causal link)

(2003/C 146/14)
In Case C-171/01: Reference to the Court under Article 234
EC by the Verfassungsgerichtshof (Austria) for a preliminary
(Language of the case: German) ruling in the proceedings brought before that court by
Wählergruppe ‘Gemeinsam Zajedno/Birlikte Alternative und
(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published Grüne GewerkschafterInnen/UG’, also represented: Bundesmi-
in the European Court Reports) nister für Wirtschaft und Arbeit, Kammer für Arbeiter und
Angestellte für Vorarlberg, Wählergruppe ‘Vorarlberger Arbei-
ter- und Angestelltenbund (ÖAAB) — AK-Präsident Josef Fink’,
Wählergruppe ‘FSG — Walter Gelbmann — mit euch ins
In Case C-122/01 P, T. Port GmbH & Co. KG, established in nächste Jahrtausend/Liste 2’, Wählergruppe ‘Freiheitliche und
Hambourg (Germany), represented by G. Meier, Rechtwanwalt: parteifreie Arbeitnehmer Vorarlberg — FPÖ’, Wählergruppe
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of ‘Gewerkschaftlicher Linksblock’, and Wählergruppe ‘NBZ —
the European Communities (Fifth Chamber) of 1 February Neue Bewegung für die Zukunft’, on the interpretation of
2001 in Case T-1/99 T. Port v Commission [2001] ECR II- Article 10(1) of Decision No 1/80 of 19 September 1980 on
465, seeking to have that judgment set aside in part, the other the development of the Association, adopted by the Associ-
party to the proceedings being: Commission of the European ation Council established by the Association Agreement
Communities (Agents: K.-D. Borchardt and M. Niejahr), the between the European Economic Community and Turkey, the
Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: J.-P. Puissochet, President Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: J.-P. Puissochet, President
of the Chamber, R. Schintgen (Rapporteur), V. Skouris, of the Chamber, R. Schintgen (Rapporteur), V. Skouris,
F. Macken and N. Colneric, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; F. Macken and J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, Judges; F.G. Jacobs,
M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for
given a judgment on 8 May 2003, in which it: the Registrar, has given a judgment on 8 May 2003, in which
it has ruled:
1. Dismisses the appeal.
Article 10(1) of Decision No 1/80 of 19 September 1980 on the
2. Orders T. Port GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.
development of the Association, adopted by the Association Council
established by the Association Agreement between the European
( 1) OJ C 161 of 2.6.2001. Economic Community and Turkey, must be interpreted as:

— having direct effect in the Member States, and